Prioritise safety, optimise success! Return to rugby postpartum.

Pregnancy and childbirth involve substantial physical, physiological and psychological changes. As such, postpartum rugby players should be supported and appropriately prepared to return to the demands of rugby alongside the additional demands of motherhood. This review aims to discuss specific perinatal considerations that inform a rugby player's readiness to return-to-sport postpartum and present an approach to rehabilitation. Before engaging in full rugby training and matchplay, postpartum players should have progressed through the initial phases of rehabilitation and graded sports-specific training to prepare them for the loads they will be exposed to. Additional rehabilitation considerations include minimising deconditioning during pregnancy; medical concerns; the abdominal wall; the pelvic floor; perinatal breast changes, breastfeeding and risk of contact breast injury; body mass; nutritional requirements; hormonal considerations; athlete identity and psychological considerations; joining team training; return to contact and tackle training; evaluating player load tolerance and future research, policy and surveillance needs. A whole-systems, biopsychosocial approach following an evidence informed return-to-sport framework is recommended when rehabilitating postpartum rugby players. Health and exercise professionals are encouraged to use the perinatal-specific recommendations in this review to guide the development of postpartum rehabilitation protocols and resources.

Enhancing Return to Alpine Skiing: Integrating Perceptual-Motor-Cognitive Considerations in Testing and Progressions: A Clinical Commentary.

Alpine skiing poses significant risks for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury at both recreational and professional levels, which is compounded by high rates of re-injury. Despite the existence of return to sport (RTS) and return to snow protocols, the frequency of ACL re-injury has not been mitigated, raising doubts about protocol effectiveness. Current RTS protocols primarily focus on biomechanical and neuromuscular factors in isolation, neglecting the important perceptual-motor-cognitive changes associated with ACL injuries and the high cognitive demands of skiing. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to address the perceptual-motor-cognitive demands specific to alpine skiing, evaluate RTS testing for skiers, and propose updated standards for testing and return to snow progressions that incorporate these considerations. Level of Evidence: 5.

Limited correlation between physical performance and patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose: The majority of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) patients wish to return to sport. Clinical evaluations after ACLr often do not include physical testing, making it difficult to determine the patient's readiness to return to sport. Thus, it would be helpful to identify easily assessable factors associated with physical function in ACLr patients that could inform planning of patients' return to sport. This study sought to evaluate the associations between physical test performance in ACLr patients and known ACL injury risk factors, knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Methods: The cohort included isolated primary ACLr patients operated between 2009 and 2014. Patients were invited to a 1-year visit to clarify their readiness to return to sport. A test battery was performed, including clinical evaluation, patient-reported outcomes and three physical tests, from which the Leg Symmetry Index (LSI) was calculated. Multivariate regression analyses were performed for each of the physical tests, including known risk factors, clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. Laxity <3 mm, pivot shift = 0, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sport >75, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) >75.9, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) >92.7 were applied as cut-off values for good versus poor status. Results: A total of 480 ACLr patients were included in the study. Laxity <3 mm had a negative impact on the single-hop LSI, whereas a pivot shift = 0 or IKDC >75.9 had a positive impact on the single-hop LSI. Age <20, a pivot shift grade of 0 and KOOSsport >75 were positively associated with the triple-hop LSI. Finally, age <20 and IKDC >75.9 were positively associated with the leg extension strength LSI. Conclusions: Age, sagittal laxity, pivot shift and patient-reported outcomes were associated with physical test performance 1 year after ACLr. However, the associations were not completely uniform and strong, so information on age, sagittal laxity, pivot shift and patient-reported outcomes cannot replace a return-to-sport functional test battery in determining when it is safe to return to sport after ACLr. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Elucidating differences in concussion subtype symptomatology in sports-related versus non-sports-related concussions: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Postconcussive symptom questionnaires (PCSQs) are often used in concussion patient assessment, yet there is a lack of knowledge as to whether symptom subtype prevalence is dependent on the mechanism of injury (MOI). These subtypes can be defined as cognitive, atlanto-occipital/cervical spine, autonomic, balance, low energy/fatigue/sleep, emotional changes, eyes, and somatic. Using an institutional PCSQ that quantitatively addressed these subtypes, this retrospective study aimed to provide insight into differences in subtype symptomatology between sports-related (SR) and non-sports-related (NSR) injuries. METHODS: Consecutive concussion patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≥ 13 and ≥ 16 years of age who were treated at a concussion clinic affiliated with an academic level I trauma center in the United States between December 2009 and January 2020 were eligible for inclusion. The authors extracted data on MOI, comorbidities, habits, prior injuries, and PCSQ results. Multivariate analysis of covariance was then conducted to determine the correlations between subtype scores and MOI while considering covariates. RESULTS: Of the 194 patients remaining after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, analysis included 91 patients in the SR group consisting of 54 (59%) males with mean ± SD (range) age of 20.9 ± 7.3 (16-58) years and 103 patients in the NSR group consisting of 38 (37%) males with mean age of 39.2 ± 14.8 (17-71) years. Demographic characteristics differed significantly between groups. Estimated marginal mean scores were significantly lower in the SR injury group compared to the NSR injury group (with comparing main effects) for the cognitive (p < 0.001), autonomic (p < 0.000), balance (p < 0.025), energy (p < 0.006), emotional (p < 0.000), and total score (p < 0.001) subtypes. Multivariate tests identified three comorbidities that contributed to differences in subtype scores between groups: migraines (p < 0.012), vertigo (p < 0.004), and anxiety (p < 0.038). No significant results were found for the remaining comorbidities of (but not limited to) depression, neuropsychiatric disorders, seizures, syncope, sleep disorder, or none. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that patients who sustain a concussion via an NSR injury present with more severe symptoms but similar concussion subtype frequency as those presenting with SR concussion. This suggests that the MOI may correlate more closely to symptom severity than concussion subtype composition, although larger patient populations with more definitive control of MOI are needed to further elucidate these claims.

Validity and reproducibility of the ARL-RSI score to assess psychological readiness before returning to sport after lateral ankle sprain.

Purpose: Although multiple scales exist to evaluate psychological readiness before returning to sport post-lateral ankle sprain (LAS), no score has been validated specifically for LAS or chronic ankle instability. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport injury (ALR-RSI) scale in assessing psychological readiness after LAS and its ability to identify patients who can return to their preinjury level. Methods: A total of 64 patients (35 females and 29 males; 33.8 ± 13.2 years) who recently experienced an acute LAS were included in this study. All patients participated in a predictive validation component of the study and were assessed at 2 and 4 months following an LAS. The ALR-RSI was completed twice by 20 patients at a 7-day interval to evaluate the reliability of the score in patients suffering from LAS. Results: The ALR-RSI was significantly (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with the other scores. The correlation was strong with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports: r = 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83) and moderate with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (r = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.60-0.78) and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scores (r = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.51-0.72). Two-month ALR-RSI scores had good ability for predicting nonreturners at 4 months (area under the curve = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9; p = 0.005). A Youden index of 0.51 was observed at an ALR-RSI score of 46%, corresponding to a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 83%. Test-retest reliability of the ALR-RSI was excellent, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), a standard error of measurement of 3.02% and a minimum detectable change of 8.37%. Conclusions: The results of the current study validated the ALR-RSI as an important questionnaire to assess psychological readiness to return to sport after LAS. Level of Evidence: Level II prospective cohort study.

Ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury scale and return to sports after ankle ligament reconstruction or repair-A systematic review.

Purpose: To systematically review existing literature regarding the ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport after injury (ALR-RSI) scale and to assess its correlation with Return to sport and functional outcomes as well as feasibility, reliability and consistency. Methods: A systematic review of the literature based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies that evaluated psychological readiness to return to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction or repair for the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability using the ALR-RSI scale were included. The results from each study were pooled, and weighted means and overall rates were calculated. Results: In total, 157 patients (53.2% male, mean age: 34.2 years) from three articles were included. Overall, 85.0% of patients reported successful return to sport, but only 48.9% of patients returned to the preoperative sporting level. All studies reported a significant difference in psychological scores between patients who returned to sport and those who did not. Pooled mean patient-reported outcome measures, reported as the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot (AOFAS, three studies) Score and Karlsson-Peterson Score (three studies), were 82.7 (range: 29-100) and 81.7 (range: 25-100), respectively. The ALR-RSI scale demonstrated strong correlations with the AOFAS Score and Karlsson-Peterson Score. Conclusion: Patients who returned to sport after ankle ligament reconstruction or repair exhibited higher psychological readiness compared to those who did not. The ALR-RSI scale showed strong correlations with ankle function. Evaluation of psychological readiness using the ALR-RSI scale may provide an additional tool in the assessment of patients who underwent ankle ligament reconstruction or repair. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in elite badminton athletes: 84% Return to sport, half return to performance.

PURPOSE: Badminton requires fast and pivoting movements, putting athletes at risk of sustaining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The primary purpose is to investigate the return to sport (RTS) and the return to performance (RTP) after an ACL injury in elite badminton athletes. The secondary purpose is to describe ACL injury mechanisms in elite badminton players. METHODS: Athletes within the top 200 of the Badminton World Federation World Ranking who sustained an ACL injury between January 2001 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. An anonymous online survey was created in eight languages. RTS, RTP and contributing factors were analysed among athletes aiming to RTP. The injury mechanism was analysed in all participants. RESULTS: Sixty-six athletes from 32 countries were included. Fifty-seven athletes (86.4%) aimed to RTP. Forty-eight out of 57 (84.2%) did RTS. Twenty-nine (50.9%) managed to successfully RTP. Forty-nine (74.2%) of ACL injuries occurred during a competition, 14 (21.2%) occured during training. Thirty-one (49.2%) occurred in the rear court backhand side and 47 (74.6%) occurred during landing after a jump. CONCLUSION: Forty-eight out of 57 (84.2%) athletes managed to RTS. Half of the athletes managed to successfully RTP. Most of the ACL injuries occurred during competition, in the rear court backhand side and during landing after a jump. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Four-year comparative analysis of return to sport and psychological recovery following ACL revision: Artificial ligament vs. anterior tibial tendon allograft.

Background: Research on return to sport and psychological recovery in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision remains scarce. The clinical efficacy of artificial ligament in ACL revision requires further exploration. Our objectives were (1) to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of artificial ligament versus allogenic tendon graft in ACL revision and (2) to analyze the effects of employing artificial ligament on return to sport and psychological recovery in ACL revision. Methods: This cohort study included the cases receiving ACL revision from 2014 to 2021 in Sports Medicine Department of Huashan Hospital. The grafts used were Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) and ATT allograft. We recorded patients' baseline data. The final follow-up assessment included subjective scales, physical examination, and return to sport status. We recorded the rates and timings of return to sport. Subjective scales included the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm Knee Scaling Score (LKSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity score, Marx activity rating score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI). Anterior knee stability was assessed using the KT-1000 arthrometer. Results: Fifty cases (LARS group: 27; ATT group: 23) enrolled and 45 (LARS group: 23; ATT group: 22) completed evaluations with a median follow-up period of 49 months. At recent follow-up, LARS group outperformed in knee stability (1.0 ± 1.9 mm vs. 2.6 ± 3.0 mm, P = 0.039), confidence (86.7 ± 12.4 vs. 69.4 ± 18.6, P < 0.001), emotion (82.7 ± 11.3 vs. 70.7 ± 16.2, P < 0.001), KOOS knee function (78.7 ± 8.8 vs. 69.5 ± 11.0, P = 0.003), quality of life (79.1 ± 16.1 vs. 66.4 ± 19.5, P = 0.014), Tegner score (6.3 ± 1.9 vs. 5.2 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), and Marx activity score (10.7 ± 3.7 vs. 7.9 ± 4.0, P = 0.012). The LARS group had significantly higher return rates: recreational (91.3 % vs. 63.6 %, P = 0.026), knee cutting and pivoting (87.0 % vs. 59.1 %, P = 0.035), competitive (78.3 % vs. 45.5 %, P = 0.023), and pre-injury (56.5 % vs. 27.3 %, P = 0.047). For return timings, the LARS group was earlier at recreational (11.2 ± 3.9 vs. 27.8 ± 9.0 weeks, P < 0.001), knee cutting and pivoting (17.2 ± 5.8 vs. 35.6 ± 13.8 weeks, P < 0.001), competitive (24.8 ± 16.2 vs. 53.2 ± 22.0 weeks, P < 0.001), and pre-injury levels (32.8 ± 11.0 vs. 72.8 ± 16.9 weeks, P < 0.001). Conclusion: In ACL revision, using LARS demonstrated improved joint stability and functionality compared to using allogenic ATT four years postoperative. Patients accepting the LARS procedure exhibited higher rates and earlier timings of return to various levels of sport, indicating enhanced confidence and emotional resilience. The translational potential of this article: In ACL revision, the choice of artificial ligament to shorten recovery time, thereby enabling patients to return to sport more quickly and effectively, is thought-provoking. The research value extends beyond mere graft selection, guiding future clinical trials and studies. This research enhances our understanding of the application value of artificial ligament in ACL revision, emphasizing the importance of psychological recovery and updating our perceptions of return to sport levels post-revision. It stimulates exploration into personalized rehabilitation programs and treatment strategies, aiming to optimize clinical outcomes and meet the real-world needs of patients with failed ACL reconstruction.

[Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon : Diagnostics, treatment and aftercare]. / Akute Achillessehnenruptur : Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge.

With up to 50 incidents per 100,000 inhabitants, Achilles tendon ruptures are among the most frequent tendon injuries encountered in orthopedics and trauma surgery. Apart from high-risk forms of sport, degenerative processes are primarily responsible for weakening and ultimately rupture. In addition to assessing the typical clinical signs with inability to perform powerful plantar flexion, the diagnostics include easy to earn examination techniques, such as the Thompson test and ultrasound as the imaging gold standard. Conservative and surgical treatment are available depending on the constitution, age and requirements of the patient. The latter option is divided into conventional open, minimally invasive or percutaneous procedures. Good to very good results can be expected regardless of the form of treatment, provided that early functional rehabilitation is carried out. The average rerupture rate is 5% and the return to sport rate is around 80%.

The severity of preoperative bone marrow oedema negatively influences short-term clinical outcomes following arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to study the effects of the severity of preoperative bone marrow oedema (BME) on the postoperative short-term outcomes following bone marrow stimulation (BMS) for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) and to propose a new metric that combines volume and signal density to evaluate BME. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with symptomatic OLTs (<100 mm2) and preoperative BME, who received BMS in our institution from April 2017 to July 2021 with follow-ups of 3, 6 and 12 months, were analysed retrospectively. The area, volume and signal value of the BME were collected on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. The enroled patients were divided into two groups according to the BME index (BMEI), which was defined as the product of oedema relative signal intensity and the relation of oedema volume to total talar volume. Visual analogue scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Tegner, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)-activities of daily living (ADL) and Sports scores were assessed before surgery and at each follow-up. The relationship between the scores and the volume, relative signal intensity and BMEI was explored. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with preoperative BME were divided into the mild (n = 33) and severe (n = 32) groups based on the BMEI. A significant difference was found for each score with the general linear model for repeated measures through all follow-up time points (p < 0.001). For the preoperative and 12-month postoperative changes of the enroled patients, 53 patients (81.5%) exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of AOFAS and 26 (40.0%) exceeded that of FAAM-sports in this study. The mild group showed significantly more improvement in AOFAS scores at 12 months (89.6 ± 7.0 vs. 86.2 ± 6.2) and FAAM-ADL scores at 6 months (83.6 ± 7.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.7) and 12 months (88.5 ± 8.5 vs. 84.4 ± 7.7) than the severe group (p < 0.05). No significant difference of all the scores between the groups was found at 3 months. No significant correlation was found in each group between BMEI and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: The severity of the preoperative BME negatively affected short-term clinical outcomes following arthroscopic BMS for OLTs. Worse clinical outcomes were shown at postoperative 6 and 12 months in patients with a high preoperative BMEI, which could be a favourable parameter for assessing the severity of BME and assist in developing personalised rehabilitation plans and determining the approach and timing of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Return to Sports and Activities after Arthroscopic Treatments for Rotator Cuff Lesions in Young Patients Less Than 45-Years-Old: A Systematic Review.

Background: To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tear (RCT) in individuals under 45 years, focusing on their ability to return to sports (RTS) and work, along with different patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, this systematic review encompassed articles that studied the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of RCT in the young population (those under 45 years old). The literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline and EMBASE until 21 May 2024. The primary outcome was the RTS, with secondary outcomes including the return to work and various PROMs. These PROMs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and 10 other PROMs. Results: Out of 6267 articles, 15 met the inclusion criteria, involving 659 patients, predominantly male athletes with a weighted mean age of 28.3 years. The RCT etiology (14 studies) was primarily traumatic (72.3%), followed by chronic microtrauma in overhead athletes (16.8%) and non-traumatic (10.9%). The RTS rate (12 studies) varied between 47% and 100%, with a cumulative rate of 75.2%. The cumulative rate of return to the same or higher RTS level (11 studies) was 56.1%. Excluding non-athletes and patients treated with debridement, the RTS rates increased to 79.8% (143/179) overall, with a 61% (108/177) rate of returning to the same or higher level. The return to work (3 studies) was successful in 90.6% of cases. Postoperative ASES scores (5 studies) improved markedly to a weighted post-operative mean of 75.6, with similar positive trends across other PROMs. Conclusions: Young adults undergoing arthroscopic RCT repair typically experience a 75% RTS rate at any level, and 56.1% RTS at the same level. Excluding non-athletes and debridement patients, RTS rates rise to 79.8% (143/179), with 61% (108/177) achieving the same or higher level. Level of evidence: IV, systematic review including case series.

Residual deficits of knee and hip joint coordination and clinical performance after return to sports in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical changes and neuromuscular adaptations have been suggested as risk factors of secondary injury in individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). To achieve a better understanding of preventive mechanisms, movement quality is an important factor of consideration. Few studies have explored time-series analysis during landing alongside clinical performance in injured and non-injured individuals. The purpose of the study was to investigate the biomechanical risks of recurrent injury by comparing clinical and jump-landing performance assessments between athletes with ACLr and healthy controls. METHOD: This study was observational study. Sixteen athletes with and without ACLr voluntarily participated in clinical and laboratory measurements. Single-leg hop distance, isokinetic tests, landing error score, and limb symmetry index (LSI) were included in clinical report. Lower limb movements were recorded to measure joint biomechanics during multi-directional landings in motion analysis laboratory. Hip-knee angle and angular velocity were explored using discrete time-point analysis, and a two-way mixed analysis of variance (2 × 4, group × jump-landing direction) was used for statistical analysis. Time series and hip-knee coordination analyses were performed using statistical parametric mapping and descriptive techniques. RESULTS: Significantly lower single-leg hop distance was noted in ACLr group (158.10 cm) compared to control group (178.38 cm). Although the hip and knee moments showed significant differences between four directions (p < 0.01), no group effect was observed (p > 0.05). Statistical parametric mapping showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups for hip abduction and coordinate plot of hip and knee joints. Athletes with ACLr demonstrated a higher velocity of hip adduction. Time-series analysis revealed differences in coordination between groups for frontal hip and knee motion. CONCLUSIONS: Athletes with ACLr landed with poor hip adduction control and stiffer knee on the involved side. Multi-directions landing should be considered over the entire time series, which may facilitate improved movement quality and return to sports in athletes with ACLr.

The effect of factors from different time points on psychological readiness following ACL reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine factors correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. DESIGN: cross sectional study. SETTING: controlled laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 164 patients (82 M/82 F, 22.5 ± 8.9yr, 171.6 ± 11.0 cm, 77.4 ± 18.6 kg, 8.6 ± 3.4 months post-ACLR) participated in this study after a primary, isolated, and uncomplicated ACLR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI). RESULTS: ACL-RSI scores demonstrated a weak positive correlation with activity level at the time of injury and a fair positive correlation with activity level at the time of post-operative testing (p-values: 0.004, <0.001). ACL-RSI scores showed a statistically significant fair negative correlation with pain and a moderate negative correlation with kinesiophobia during rehabilitation (p-values: <0.001, <0.001). There was no statistical significance between ACL-RSI and the surgical variables (p-value range: 0.10-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes from testing during postoperative rehabilitation were most correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. Increased pain and kinesiophobia were associated with a decreased psychological readiness. Increased activity level prior to injury and activity level at the time of testing during rehabilitation were both correlated with increased psychological readiness. Psychological readiness to return to activity may need to be customized based on potentially modifiable patient-specific factors during the post-operative rehabilitation.

The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for Muscle Strains in Athletes.

Muscle tears/strains are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries, posing a serious challenge for sports medicine. Aiming to reduce the time to return to play and the rate of reinjuries, apart from the traditional conservative treatments and rehabilitation protocols, new and innovative therapeutic options have emerged, particularly platelet-rich plasma (PRP). This study aims to present the available evidence regarding PRP injection for the treatment of muscle strains in athletes. Two databases were searched for articles published between January 2012 and December 2022 in Portuguese or English. The query used for the PubMed database was ("Muscles/injuries"[Mesh]) AND ("Athletes"[Mesh] OR "Athletic Injuries"[Mesh]) AND "Platelet-Rich Plasma"[Mesh], while for the Web of Science database the search was performed for "Platelet-rich plasma" AND "Muscle injuries" AND ("Athletes" OR "Athletic injuries"). Eleven studies involving athletes diagnosed with muscle injuries who received treatment with PRP injection alone, or in combination with traditional conservative treatment, compared to a control group, were included. Four randomized controlled trials, four systematic reviews/meta-analyses, two retrospective studies, and one comparative study were included. Current evidence from the highest-quality studies does not support the hypothesis of reduction of time to return to play and the rate of reinjuries after PRP injection, even though some studies reported positive results. However, the available evidence suggests that PRP might have a beneficial effect on the pain perceived by athletes following an acute muscle strain. It is challenging to arrive at definitive conclusions and translate these findings into a clinical context for treating muscle strains in athletes. The existing trials present several inconsistencies and limitations, with a heterogeneous set of patients and injuries, as well as the use of different and inconsistent methods for preparing, administering, and measuring the effects of PRP. To achieve consistent outcomes, standardizing PRP administration procedures is essential.

Combined Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Smiley Face Rod Technique Using Dual-Headed Pedicle Screws for L4 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and L5 Spondylolysis.

Spondylolysis with pseudarthrosis may be treated surgically by repairing the spondylolysis using the smiley face rod (SFR) technique. The SFR technique can avoid adjacent segmental disease caused by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), which is one of the main surgical techniques to treat isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis. A 59-year-old woman had been playing softball since she was 12 years old and was a member of a prefectural representative team. She sought treatment because of numbness in her left lower limb and difficulty playing softball. Despite conservative treatment for a year, her symptoms did not improve. Physical examination revealed decreased patellar tendon reflexes and numbness and pain from the front of the thigh to the lower leg without muscle weakness. Imaging showed L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis with Meyerding classification grade 2 anterior slip and L5 spondylolysis with pseudarthrosis. We diagnosed L4 radiculopathy caused by L4/5 foraminal stenosis and L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis with L5 spondylolysis. She underwent surgery combining the TLIF of L4/5 and the SFR technique of L5 using dual-headed pedicle screws that can fix two types of rods with L5 pedicle screws. Three months after surgery, fusion between L4/5 and fusion of the L5 pars cleft were confirmed. She resumed sports, and one year postoperatively, she was able to participate in softball games. Two years postoperatively, she could bat, run, and play defense without adjacent segmental disease. Two-segment TLIF increases adjacent segmental disease more than single-segment TLIF. Because the L5 spondylolysis had not slipped, we chose the SFR technique to preserve mobility at L5/S1. The dual-headed pedicle screw fastens two-type rods at the head of the pedicle screw, making it a suitable design for this procedure.

Surgical Management of Hook of Hamate Fractures: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.

Purpose: This review aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus excision in the surgical treatment of hook of hamate fractures. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases from 1954 to 2023 was performed using the search term "hook of hamate fracture" to identify all publications regarding the use of ORIF or excision in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures. Outcomes included a return to sport, pain, ulnar nerve dysfunction, flexor tendon dysfunction, union rate, wrist range of motion (ROM; % of contralateral hand), grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scores. Results: Twenty-seven of the 705 total screened articles were included. Excision of the hook of hamate (n = 779) resulted in a shorter return to sport time (6 vs 7.8 weeks), lower rates of postoperative pain (6.1% vs 33.3%), higher rates of ulnar nerve sensory dysfunction (4.2% vs 0%), and higher rates of ulnar nerve motor dysfunction (1.5% vs 0%) relative to ORIF (n = 51). Chronic fractures had a longer return to sport time (7.2 vs 5.7 weeks) relative to nonchronic injuries. Conclusions: Both surgical procedures appear to yield acceptable outcomes in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures. However, based on the sparsity of available data, we are unable to determine a consistent difference between hook of hamate excision and ORIF. Clinical relevance: To our knowledge, no current consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for hook of hamate fractures exists. Our findings emphasize the need for a large prospective cohort study using standardized outcomes to provide strong evidence as to whether surgical excision or ORIF yields greater outcomes in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures.

Are demographics, physical function and psychological response associated with return to sport at one year following ACL-reconstruction?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contribution of each of the following aspects: demographics, physical function, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including both physical and psychological constructs, to return to sport (RTS) (any level) one-year post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. METHODS: We included data for 143 participants (73 women, mean (SD) age 24 (5.8) years) âˆ¼ one-year post-ACLR. Data comprised demographics, physical function (hop performance, hip and knee peak torque) and PROMs (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, perceived stress, and ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)). We then used a Z-normalized multivariable logistic regression model to establish the relative contribution of factors associated with RTS. RESULTS: Sixty-four (45%) of the participants had returned to sport at one year post-ACLR. In the regression model, greater hip abduction peak torque (OR = 1.70, 95% CI; 1.01 to 2.84) and greater psychological readiness to RTS (OR = 2.32, 95% CI; 1.30 to 4.12) were the only variables associated with RTS (R2 = 0.352). CONCLUSIONS: The significant contribution of hip abduction strength and psychological readiness to RTS was still relatively small, suggesting other potential factors explaining RTS which may not be captured by common RTS criteria.

Surgical and Biological Treatment with a Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix for Patellar Tendinopathy: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sport at 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy (PT) involves anterior knee pain and functional. Platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) is a promising biological therapy for tendinopathies. We examined a cohort of PT patients treated with tendon debridement and autologous PRFM at the 24-month follow-up to assess whether the combined treatment facilitated return to sports and yielded satisfactory clinical and functional scores. METHODS: Baseline and 24-month visual analogue scale (VAS), Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment Scale for Patellar Tendinopathy (VISA-P), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and Blazina scores were compared to evaluate treatment effectiveness. The Friedman test was used to compare repeated observations of VAS, VISA-P, TAS, and Blazina Score values. Return to sport rate, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TKS) score and patient satisfaction were collected at 24 months. RESULTS: The postoperative clinical scores demonstrated significant improvement compared with their preoperative values (all p < 0.001). Specifically, the VISA-P score was 80.32 (±20.58), 92.10% of patients had resumed sports activities and patient satisfaction was 9.21 (±1.21) at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debridement and autologous PRFM application in patients with chronic PT resulted in a higher rate of return to sports when compared to solely surgical treatment, significantly improved clinical outcomes and excellent patient satisfaction at 24 months.

Reliability and Validity of Temporal Parameters during the Side Hop Test in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background: The side hop test (SHT) measures the number of jumps performed over 30 s. Although this measure has demonstrated its value in clinical practice, the temporal parameters of the SHT allow for a deeper analysis of the execution strategy. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and construct validity of contact time parameters during the SHT recorded by a video analysis system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) patients. Methods: We investigated the reliability (intra-rater, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC)), discriminant validity (operated (OP) versus non-operated (NOP) side), and convergent validity (relationship with strength and psychological readiness) of SHT contact time parameters, number of valid hops and limb symmetry index (LSI) in 38 ACLR patients. Contact time parameters are presented as mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of contact time. Results: Intra-tester reliability was good to excellent for all contact time parameters. For discriminant validity, the mean and SD contact times of the OP leg were significantly longer than those of the NOP leg, although the difference was smaller than the SEM and MDC values. The number of valid jumps and CV contact time parameters were not significantly different. Isokinetic quadriceps strength (60°/s) was strongly correlated with mean contact time for both legs. However, psychological readiness was not correlated with any of the contact time parameters. Conclusions: Temporal parameters of the SHT measured on video analysis are valid and reliable parameters to assess the performance strategy of the SHT. The results should be interpreted with caution regarding the SEM and MDC values. Further studies are needed to measure criterion validity, inter-rater reliability, and responsiveness.

Validity and Reliability of the Orthelligent Pro Sensor for Measuring Single-Leg Vertical Jump Height in Healthy Athletic Adults.

The Orthelligent Pro sensor is a practicable, portable measuring instrument. This study assessed the validity and reliability of this sensor in measuring single-leg countermovement jumps. Fifty healthy athletic adults participated in two measurement sessions a week apart in time. They performed single-leg countermovement jumps on the force plate while wearing the Orthelligent Pro sensor on their lower leg. During the first measurement session, Tester 1 invited the participants to make three single-leg countermovement jumps; subsequently, Tester 2 did the same. For assessing the sensor's intratester reliability, Tester 1 again invited the participants to make three single-leg countermovement jumps during the second measurement session. The sensor's validity was assessed by using the force plate results as the gold standard. To determinate the agreement between two measurements, Bland-Altman plots were created. The intertester reliability (ICC = 0.99; 0.97) and intratester reliability (ICC = 0.96; 0.82) were both excellent. The validity calculated (i) on the basis of the mean value of three jumps and (ii) on the basis of the maximum value of three jumps was very high, but it showed a systematic error. Taking this error into account, physiotherapists can use the Orthelligent Pro sensor as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the jump height of countermovement jumps.