Revision Rates and Symptom Trends Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Impact of Race on Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of demographics and sinonasal comorbidities on the revision rate of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often successful in providing long-term relief for patients suffering from CRS, revision surgery can occur. There is conflicting literature on the impact of race on FESS outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent FESS for CRS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 at a single tertiary care academic center. RESULTS: A total of 682 patients between the ages of 18 and 89 underwent primary ESS between January 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 and were included in this study. Of these patients, 388 (56.9%) were female, with an average age of 48.6 ± 16.7. Thirty-eight patients (5.6%) underwent revision sinus surgery during the study period. Patients that identified as White had significantly lower rates of revision sinus surgery (4.1%) than non-White patients (10.7%), including those identifying as Asian, Black, multiracial, or other. On multivariate analysis, non-White race (OR 4.933), polyposis (3.175), and high preoperative SNOT-22 scores (OR 1.029) were independently associated with revision sinus surgery. The mean preoperative SNOT-22 for all participants was 39.1 ± 22.0, whereas the mean postoperative SNOT-22 was 20.6 ± 17.5 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery that is independent of location and insurance status. More studies are required to assess the reason race plays an important role in outcomes following revision sinus surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2878-2884, 2023.

Revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis via modified agger nasi approach.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical effects of revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery (RESS) through modified agger nasi (MAN)-middle turbinate resection on refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: We reviewed 156 patients who were treated for refractory CRS from February 2012 to August 2014. These patients had been diagnosed with refractory CRS by computed tomography and endoscopy and had received several surgical and medical treatments in the past, but their condition had not been cured. They were divided into the observation group (RESS through MAN-middle turbinate resection, n = 78) and the control group (endoscopic sinus surgery, n = 78). Complete or partial control of the patient's symptoms and signs suggested that the treatment was effective, and no improvement in the symptoms and signs indicated that the treatment was ineffective. RESULTS: The 6-month treatment efficacy rate was significantly higher in the observation group (91.03%) than in the control group (71.79%). The observation group had a significantly lower complication rate (7.69%) and recurrence rate (3.85%) than the control group (17.95% and 12.82%, respectively). CONCLUSION: RESS through MAN-middle turbinate resection together with adequate perioperative preparation has a significant effect on the outcome of refractory CRS and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Rate and Factors Associated With Change in Surgeon for Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: A subset of patients will undergo revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) with a different otolaryngologist than the one who performed their primary surgery. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of and clinicodemographic factors associated with a change in surgeon for revision ESS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent at least two outpatient ESS procedures between 2009 and 2014 using the State Ambulatory Surgery Database for Florida were included in the study. Change in surgeon was defined by a change in a unique provider identifier for the revision procedure. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine characteristics associated with a change in surgeon. RESULTS: A total of 2,963 patients were included. For the revision procedure, 47.7% of patients changed their surgeon. On multivariable logistic regression, a medium- (odds ratio [OR]: 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.77) or high-volume (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.42-0.61) surgeon performing the index surgery and advanced age (≥65 years) (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.63-0.99) were associated with decreased odds of surgeon change for revision ESS. Longer time elapsed between index and revision surgery (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.13-1.17) was associated with increased odds of surgeon change. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of patients who undergo revision ESS select a surgeon other than the one who performed their primary procedure. Surgeon volume, age, and time between surgeries affect the likelihood of a change in surgeon for revision ESS. These findings may provide introductory insights into patient preferences and decision making in the surgical management of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1049-E1053, 2021.

[Objective assessment of nasal function changes after revision endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with recurrent sinusitis].

Objective:To investigate the objective evaluation system of nasal function changes in patients with recurrent sinusitis after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. Method:Sixty patients with recurrent sinusitis underwent revision endoscopic sinus surgery. The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score and Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score were performed before surgery, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The saccharin test was used to evaluate the nasal mucosa ciliary moving function（nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity） before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The correlation of objective evaluation indexes before and after surgery was analyzed. Result:The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score and Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score of patients 3, 6, 12 months after surgery were lower than those before surgery（P<0.05）; The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score and Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score of patients 6 and 12 months after surgery were lower than those 3 months after surgery（P<0.05）; The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score and Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score of patients 12 months after surgery were lower than those 6 months after surgery（P<0.05）. The nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity of patients 6 and 12 months after surgery was lower than that before surgery（P<0.05）; The nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity of patients 12 months after surgery was lower than that 6 months after surgery（P<0.05）. The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score was positively correlated with Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score in patients before surgery, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery（P<0.05）; The Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score was negatively correlated with nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity in patients before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery（P<0.05）; The Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score was negatively correlated with nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity in patients before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery（P<0.05）. Conclusion:There is good correlation among the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic sinus score, the Lund-Mackay paranasal sinus CT score and the nasal mucosal ciliary motor velocity in patients with recurrent sinusitis before and after revision endoscopic sinus surgery. This study establishes an objective evaluation system for evaluating the changes in nasal function with these three indexes as the main body.

A Clinical Analysis of Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Single-Center 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has become a popular procedure for treating chronic sinusitis. Despite recent developments in medical and surgical techniques, primary ESS can still fail. Although revision ESS is one solution to the problem of recurrent sinusitis, revision surgery is stressful for patients and otolaryngologists. Therefore, we examined the causes of ESS failure and sought to find ways to prevent the failure of primary ESS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent revision ESS in our department between April 2003 and March 2012 were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: During this period, revision ESS was performed 40 times to treat chronic sinusitis. We analyzed the preoperative computed tomographic (CT) findings of primary and revision ESS cases using the Lund-Mackay and Kennedy CT staging scores to compare disease severity. In our cases, the failure of ESS was not affected by the extent of disease, asthma, or allergy. Polyposis was the only useful predictor of revision ESS. CONCLUSION: Polyposis is an important predictor of revision ESS. We recommend that patients be followed frequently and carefully, especially those with polyps.

CT Findings in Revision Endoscopic Sinus Surgery / 대한이비인후과학회지

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: When performing a revision endoscopic sinus surgery, operators should pay close attention due to the altered sinonasal anatomy or defects of anatomical landmarks. Careful preoperative evaluation of altered anatomy is important, however, little has been reported on its structural changes. We investigated status of anatomical structures and mucosal pathology by reviewing OMU CT in revision sinus surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 117 operated sides (right: 59, left: 58) from 62 patients who received revision endoscopic sinus surgeries were evaluated. They had history of previous sinus surgeries such as Caldwell-Luc operation, polypectomy, or endoscopic sinus surgery. We investigated the following 5 parameters by reviewing preoperative OMU CT; Sinus mucosal pathology, bony thickening, absence of superior or middle turbinate, structural changes of superior or middle turbinate, and defects of anatomical landmarks. RESULTS: Sinus mucosal pathology was most commonly found in the maxillary sinuses, and was followed by the anterior ethmoid, the posterior ethmoid, the frontal, and the sphenoid sinuses. Out of 117 sides, 47 showed bony thickening and 7 showed absence of superior or middle turbinate. Eleven revealed structural changes in the superior or middle turbinate, and three showed defects in the lamina papyracea. However, there was no complete absence of the middle or superior turbinates, all of which were partially preserved. CONCLUSION: Significant bony thickening, defects or changes of anatomical structures and associated mucosal pathology were frequently found in revision endoscopic sinus surgeries. Preoperative review of OMU CT, identification of structural changes, and close attention during surgery would be necessary.