Current and Future of Robotic Surgery in Thyroid Cancer Treatment.

Thyroid cancer is among the most common endocrine malignancies, necessitating effective surgical interventions. Traditional open cervicotomy has long been the standard approach for thyroidectomy. However, the advent of robotic surgery has introduced new possibilities for minimally invasive procedures with benefits in terms of cosmetic outcomes, enhanced precision, comparable complication rates, and reduced recovery time. This study mainly reviewed the most widely used and well-known robotic thyroidectomy approaches: the transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach, and the transoral approach. This review examines the current status and future potential of robotic surgery in thyroid cancer treatment, comparing its efficacy, safety, and outcomes with those of conventional open cervicotomy. Challenges such as a longer operative time and higher costs exist. Future directions include technological advancements, tele-surgery, single-port surgery, and the integration of artificial intelligence. Robotic surgery holds promise in optimizing patient outcomes in thyroid cancer treatment.

TSH receptor antibody as a predictor of difficult robotic thyroidectomy in patients with Graves' disease.

Thyroidectomy in Graves' disease can be challenging due to greater thyroid size and vascularity. While thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) level is associated with disease severity and thyroid vascularity, its impact on operative outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare challenging factors for robotic thyroidectomy (RT) and open thyroidectomy (OT) in Graves' disease patients, including TRAb as a predictive factor for difficult thyroidectomy. This retrospective study included Graves' disease patients who underwent total thyroidectomy between September 2013 and January 2023. The clinical characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between patients who received OT and bilateral axillo-breast approach RT. Factors affecting operation time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were evaluated in both groups using regression analyses. A total of 85 patients received either OT (n = 48) or RT (n = 37). Median thyroid volumes in the OT and RT groups were 72.4 g and 57.6 g, respectively. Operation time was affected by thyroid volume in both groups. Additionally, higher thyroid hormone levels and bilateral central neck node dissection prolonged operation time in the RT group. EBL was marginally associated with thyroid volume in the OT group. However, in the RT group, TRAb level was independently associated with greater EBL (p = 0.04), while no significant association was found with thyroid volume. Predictive factors for difficult thyroidectomy differed by operation approaches. TRAb significantly predicted intraoperative bleeding in RT, while this association was absent in OT. Caution is warranted when performing RT on Graves' disease patients with high TRAb levels.

Perioperative outcomes of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABART) versus minimally invasive thyroidectomy (MIT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Minimally invasive thyroidectomy (MIT) is increasingly being used for the thyroid tumors. The comparison of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABART) with other MIT has not yet led to a unified conclusion with regard to surgical outcomes. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the surgical outcomes of BABART compared with MIT. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library database for randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs that compare BABART to MIT. The primary outcomes included perioperative, postoperative complications. The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Nine studies, comprising 3645 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings indicated that there were no significant differences in hospital stay, number of retrieved lymph nodes, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, and vocal cord dysfunction between BABRT and MIT. However, BABART was associated with a shorter operation time (MD = - 21.45 min, 95% CI [- 47.27, 4.38], p = 0.1) and lower rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.20, 0.88], p = 0.02). Additionally, the MIT group had reduced postoperative pain score (MD = 0.45, 95% CI [0.02, 0.88], p = 0.04) and lower rate of hypocalcemia (OR = 2.31, 95% CI [1.04, 5.13], p = 0.04) than the BABART group. In comparison with MIT, BABART exhibits better results in terms of operative time and the rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism, with no significant difference in hospital stay, number of retrieved lymph nodes, RLN injury, and vocal cord dysfunction. However, the postoperative pain score and the rate of hypocalcemia of MIT are slightly better that of BABART.

Comparison of Robotic Versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy for Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This review aims to investigate the safety of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) by comparing robotic thyroidectomy (RT) versus open thyroidectomy (OT) in Western and Asian populations. Two main outcomes of this review were (1) the safety of RLN comparing the robotic and OT assessing transient and permanent laryngeal nerve (PLN) palsy as a postoperative complication in each surgical procedure and (2) the safety of RLN comparing the robotic and OT assessing transient and permanent laryngeal nerve (PLN) palsy as a postoperative complication between studies conducted in USA/Europe and Asia. We searched relevant literature in electronic databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) up to September 2022. Further research was performed during January 2024 in the Scopus database. Two primary outcomes were set: transient RLN palsy and permanent RLN palsy, comparing RT and OT. In this review, 18 non-randomized studies were included. A statistically significant difference between robotic and conventional OT was not observed either in transient RLN or in permanent RLN palsy. The odds ratio (OR) for the overall comparison of transient RLN palsy was 1.18, and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.80-1.74. The subgroup analysis for transient RLN palsy between USA/Europe studies was OR 1.28, and the 95% CI was 0.64-2.58. The subgroup analysis for transient RLN palsy between Asian studies was OR 1.14, and the 95% CI was 0.72-1.82. The OR for the overall comparison of permanent RLN palsy was OR 0.90, and the 95% CI was 0.38-2.15. The subgroup analysis for permanent RLN palsy between USA/Europe studies was OR 0.45, and the 95% CI was 0.07-2.97. The subgroup analysis for permanent RLN palsy between Asian studies was OR 1.13, and the 95% CI was 0.42-3.05. Heterogeneity I2 was 0% in all outcomes. The Mantel-Haenszel method fixed effect was used. First, RT and open conventional thyroidectomy have comparable safety for RLN, although the analysis showed no statistically significant results. Second, no statistically significant results were found for RLN safety in either USA/Europe or Asian studies. Considering that there is not a statistically significant difference between the two approaches for RLN safety, and due to the limited number of studies from Western countries, the results should be considered with caution. Important factors such as the patient's body characteristics, the existing thyroid pathology, and the surgical approach should be kept in mind. More comparable studies are needed on the Western population.

Optimizing robotic thyroid surgery: lessons learned from an retrospective analysis of 104 cases.

Background: Robotic assistance in thyroidectomy is a developing field that promises enhanced surgical precision and improved patient outcomes. This study investigates the impact of the da Vinci Surgical System on operative efficiency, learning curve, and postoperative outcomes in thyroid surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 104 patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy between March 2018 and January 2022. We evaluated the learning curve using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis and analyzed operative times, complication rates, and postoperative recovery metrics. Results: The cohort had a mean age of 36 years, predominantly female (68.3%). The average body mass index (BMI) was within the normal range. A significant reduction in operative times was observed as the series progressed, with no permanent hypoparathyroidism or recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries reported. The learning curve plateaued after the 37th case. Postoperative recovery was consistent, with no significant difference in hospital stay duration. Complications were minimal, with a noted decrease in transient vocal cord palsy as experience with the robotic system increased. Conclusion: Robotic thyroidectomy using the da Vinci system has demonstrated a significant improvement in operative efficiency without compromising safety. The learning curve is steep but manageable, and once overcome, it leads to improved surgical outcomes and high patient satisfaction. Further research with larger datasets and longer follow-up is necessary to establish the long-term benefits of robotic thyroidectomy.

Comparison of transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy.

Transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy can really make the patient's body surface free of scar. This study aimed to compare the surgical and patient-related outcomes between the transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy and traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy. The clinical data of 120 patients underwent transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy (TOVRT) or traditional low-collar incision thyroidectomy (TLCIT) were collected from May 2020 to October 2021. Propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize selection bias. All these patients were diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration prior to surgical intervention and surgical plan was tailored for each patient. An intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) detection system was used in all patients, whose RLNs were identified and protected. We performed transoral vestibular robotic thyroidectomy with three intraoral incisions. Additional right axillary fold incisions were adopted occasionally to enhance fine reverse traction of tissue for radical tumor dissection. Clinical data including gender, age, tumor size, BMI, operation time, postoperative drainage volume and time, pain score, postoperative length of stay (LOS),number of lymph nodes removed, complications, and medical expense were observed and analyzed. Propensity score matching was used for 1:1 matching between the TOVRT group and the TLCIT group. All these patients accepted total thyroidectomy(or lobectomy) plus central lymph node dissection and all suffered from PTC confirmed by postoperative pathology. No conversion to open surgery happened in TOVRT group. The operative time of TOVRT group was longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The postoperative drainage volume of TOVRT group was more than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). The drainage tube placement time of TOVRT group were longer than that of TLCIT group (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in intraoperative bleeding volume, pain score and medical expense between the two groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of perioperative common complications such as hypoparathyroidism and vocal cord paralysis in the two groups was almost identical (P > 0.05). However, there were some specific complications such as surgical area infection (one case), skin burn (one case), oral tear (two cases), and paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin (two cases) were found in TOVRT group. Obviously, the postoperative cosmetic effect of the TOVRT group was better than TLCIT group (P < 0.05). TOVRT is safe and feasible for low to moderate-risk PTC patients and is a potential alternative for patients who require no scar on their neck. Patients accepted TOVRT can get more satisfaction and have less psychologic injury caused by surgery.

Comparison of postoperative pain between transoral and conventional thyroidectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The extent of postoperative pain following transoral thyroidectomy is not well-understood and remains a subject of debate. This study aims to analyze and compare postoperative pain levels between patients undergoing transoral and conventional transcervical thyroidectomy. METHODS: A prospective evaluation on postoperative pain was conducted in 310 patients undergoing conventional thyroidectomy and 194 undergoing transoral thyroidectomy. Pain levels were evaluated using the numerical rating scale (NRS, ranging from 0 to 10) through preoperative and postoperative questionnaires at specified time points: 1, 3, and 6 days, and 1 and 3 months following surgery. Propensity score-matched analysis was carried out based on six covariates: sex, age, body mass index, extent of thyroidectomy, tumor size, and central neck dissection. RESULTS: After propensity score matching based on the six covariates, 121 patient pairs were identified from each group. Within this matched cohort, postoperative pain scores significantly worsened 1 day after surgery but showed progressive recovery up to 3 months post-surgery in both groups. The transoral group exhibited higher postoperative pain scores than the conventional group from day 1 (4.43 ± 2.6 vs. 3.11 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) to day 6 (1.76 ± 1.9 vs. 1.13 ± 1.6, p = 0.016) post-surgery, with no significant difference noted at 1 month. Among transoral procedures, pain scores were significantly higher for the endoscopic approach compared to the robotic approach on days 1 (5.52 ± 2.3 vs. 4.29 ± 2.3, p = 0.028) and 3 (3.52 ± 2.5 vs. 2.64 ± 2.0, p = 0.047) post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pain was significantly higher in transoral thyroidectomy compared to conventional thyroidectomy up to 6 days post-surgery. Within the transoral group, the robotic procedure resulted in lower pain levels than the endoscopic approach during the early postoperative period.

Patient-reported swallowing outcomes after transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Comparison with conventional transcervical thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the swallowing outcomes after transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) and compare them with those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy. METHOD: We enrolled 146 patients who underwent thyroidectomy (73 TORT; 73 conventional approach). We prospectively analyzed swallowing outcomes using the Swallowing Impairment Index-6 (SIS-6) questionnaire, a patient-reported measure, before and 1, 3, and 6 days; 1, 3, and 6 months; and 1 year after surgery. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed using three covariates: age, sex, and extent of thyroidectomy. RESULTS: SIS-6 scores worsened significantly immediately after surgery and progressively recovered 1 year postoperatively in both groups. Propensity score matching generated two matched groups of 22 patients each. In the propensity score-matched samples, the SIS-6 scores did not differ between the TORT and conventional groups, except at 1 day postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported swallowing outcomes of TORT were comparable to those of the conventional transcervical procedure.

Definition of learning curve for thyroidectomy: systematic review on the different approaches.

Background: Thyroidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures carried out worldwide and it has evolved in recent years with alternative approaches. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, the learning curve (LC) concept has become a fundamental "dogma". Methods: A literature search, according to the PRISMA guidelines, was performed via PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Only studies assessing the learning process to thyroidectomy (including hemi- and total thyroidectomy), reporting a minimum of 30 procedures and describing clearly the minimum number of performances required to achieve proficiency and the main evaluation items used to establish it, were included. Conventional, endoscopic and robotic approaches were separately analyzed. Only English-language studies were considered. Results: Forty-five relevant studies were selected for the analysis [respectively 16 concerning robotic thyroidectomy (RT), 22 endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), 6 mini-invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), 1 conventional thyroidectomy (CT)]. The number of procedures required for a single surgeon to achieve competence and the parameters used to define surgical proficiency were fully investigated for each individual technique. Conclusions: Our research shows how the current literature lacks an objective definition of the LC concept. The heterogeneity of analysis methodologies and parameters evaluated, the various surgical techniques and training background of single surgeons, make it impossible to draw univocal results. Future studies should consider confounding factors and establish criteria that should be consensually recognized in the assessment of surgical performances and skills.

Robot-assisted transaxillary surgery for thyroid cancer: Oncologic and surgical outcomes in long term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The use of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) has rapidly spread in the last 2 decades, although it is mostly limited to Asian countries. METHOD: We retrospectively enroled all patients with histologic diagnoses of thyroid cancer who underwent RATT at the University Hospital of Pisa from May 2012 to September 2020. RESULTS: The study included 242 patients; 128 (47%) underwent total thyroidectomy and 114 (53%) underwent thyroid lobectomy, among which 28 patients (24.6%) required completion thyroidectomy. Radioactive iodine ablation therapy was required in 90 patients (37%). The complication rate was 5.3%. After a median follow-up of 38 months, an excellent response to therapy was achieved in 107 patients (74%), whereas the response was indeterminate in 12 (8%) and incomplete in 16 (11%). No local or distant relapses or increases in thyroglobulin or antibody levels were documented. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, RATT represents a valid option for the treatment of thyroid cancer in selected cases.

Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: the mid-term oncological outcome.

BACKGROUND: Traditional open thyroidectomy is the surgical standard for thyroid cancer; however, it inevitably leaves a visible scar on the neck and affects the patient's quality of life. Therefore, to avoid making a neck incision, the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) have been developed recently, and the surgical outcomes of these techniques are as favorable as open surgery for benign disease. Additionally, positive short-term surgical outcomes have also been achieved in a few patients with thyroid cancer. However, no data on the mid-to-long-term recurrence and survival rates of transoral thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer are available. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the surgical outcomes and mid-term oncological results of the TOETVA and TORT in patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: We reviewed patients who had received TOETVA or TORT between July 2017 and November 2021 and followed up on their oncological outcomes until December 2022. Perioperative surgical and mid-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The 115 patients underwent 122 operations (57 TOETVAs and 65 TORTs), including seven complete thyroidectomies for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), Stage I-II, including T1-T3, N0-N1a, and initial low- to high-risk groups. There was no conversion from transoral to open surgery. TORT required a longer operating time (median [interquartile range]) than TOETVA (lobectomy: 279 [250, 318] vs. 196 [173, 253] min, p < 0.001; bilateral total thyroidectomy: 375 [309, 433] vs. 279 [238, 312] min, p < 0.001); however, no difference was found between the two groups regarding perioperative complications. Complete thyroidectomy with a second transoral approach was safe. TOETVA and TORT achieved favorable oncological outcomes with 100% survival and 98.2% acceptable response (excellent and indeterminate response) during a mean 37.88 ± 12.42 months mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy was safe and achieved favorable mid-term oncological outcomes in a selected cohort of patients with early-stage DTC.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs. transoral robotic thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT). We carried out a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on studies comparing TOETVA and TORT until January 2023. A total of five articles published between 2018 and 2023 that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included 641 patients (394 TOETVA patients and 247 TORT patients). TOETVA group was associated with a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 60.08 min [95% confidence interval (CI) - 83.95 to - 36.20; P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was more common in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.14-7.88; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other outcomes, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, and transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The TOETVA group was associated with shorter operative time and more transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the TORT group. Each procedure has its benefits and limitations. The surgical approach should be determined by considering the patient's characteristics and preferences, as well as the surgeon's preference and area of expertise.

Comparison of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

For papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) surgery requiring total thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection, it is controversial whether the bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA RT) can replace the open thyroidectomy (OT). To evaluate the efficacy of two surgical approaches. Relevant literatures were searched from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing two surgical approaches and meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. Compared with OT, BABA RT showed a similar incidence of postoperative complications, including recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, hypocalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, bleeding, chyle leakage and incision infection, as well as number of retrieved central lymph nodes and postoperative total dose of radioactive iodine. However, BABA RT involved longer operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] 72.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 48.15-97.10, P < .00001) and higher postoperative stimulated thyroglobulin level ([WMD] 0.12, 95% [CI] 0.05-0.19, P = .0006). The efficacy of BABA RT is basically similar to OT in this meta-analysis, but the higher postoperative stimulated thyroglobulin level attracts our attention. Longer operative time requires us to shorten. Randomized clinical trials with large samples and longer follow-up data are still essential to further demonstrate the value of the BABA RT.

Three-Port Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although transoral thyroidectomy has become popular in thyroid surgery, transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) has only been successfully applied in a very small number of medical centers worldwide.[1,2,3,4,5] In this video, we show a three-port TORT without an axillary incision for papillary thyroid carcinoma. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 35-year-old female with cT1aN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma had a strong motivation to proceed with surgery but avoid external neck incisions. Thus, we decided to perform a hemithyroidectomy with isthmusectomy using a transoral robotic approach, employing the da Vinci Xi surgical system. RESULTS: The operation was completed successfully without conversion to open surgery. The working space creation time, docking time, and console time were 30 min, 40 min, and 130 min, respectively. The pathological results were papillary thyroid carcinoma with 6- and 5-mm tumors. The patient was discharged 4 days after surgery without any complications such as bleeding, infection, mental nerve damage, permanent hoarseness, or hypoparathyroidism. The patient was completely satisfied with the cosmetic result. CONCLUSION: Three-port TORT without an axillary incision is a promising approach with optimal cosmetic outcomes. For Vietnam, a developing country, success in the application of TORT using the new da Vinci Xi robotic platform for thyroid cancer is an important milestone in the development of thyroid surgery.

Three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy without axillary incision: A preliminary report on a case series from Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is one of the newest approaches and draws attention because of its cosmetic excellence. Here, we present our preliminary data from the initial 5 consecutive patients to explore the feasibility of three-port TORT without axillary incision. METHODS: From August 2022 to December 2022, we performed TORT using three ports via the da Vinci Xi system with three robotic arms. RESULTS: All 5 patients had cT1aN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinomas with a mean tumour size of 6 mm. All patients underwent lobectomy with ipsilateral central neck dissection. The mean surgical time was 170 ± 15,8 min; the average length of hospital stay is 4.2 days. The number of retrieved central lymph nodes was 4.2 ± 0.8. All patients were discharged uneventfully without complications and completely satisfied with the cosmetic results. CONCLUSIONS: TORT is feasible and safe when performed on carefully selected patients by experienced surgeons.

Remote-access robotic thyroidectomy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Recently, robotic surgery has been introduced as a new surgical approach to the thyroid. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this systematic review is to critically examine safety and feasibility of the different robotic approaches. METHODS: The literature on robotic thyroidectomy was systematically reviewed. Primary endpoints were surgery duration, length of hospital stay, complications, postoperative pain and cosmetic satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-eight studies with a total of 14433 patients were included. Depending on the robotic approach used, operative duration ranged between 89 and 230 min and hospitalisation stay between 0.1 and 5.6 days. Complication rates varied between 7.3% and 29%. Postoperative pain visual analogue scores (VAS) ranged from 0.6 to 4.71. CONCLUSION: Robotic thyroidectomy results in high cosmetic satisfaction and quality of life. No differences in complication rates between robotic and traditional approaches are observed, supporting safety and feasibility of these robotic techniques.

Learning curve of transoral robotic thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Transoral thyroidectomy has superior cosmesis and better postoperative voice outcomes than conventional thyroidectomy. However, it usually requires a steep learning curve and longer operative time. The transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) learning curve has not been well investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the TORT learning curve and factors affecting operative time. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 173 consecutive patients who underwent TORT with or without central neck dissection from July 2017 to August 2021. We assessed the TORT learning curve using operative time, complication rate, and surgical success (procedure conversion) rate. The operative time and surgical success rate learning curves were calculated using the cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. Additionally, we analyzed factors affecting operative time in TORT. RESULTS: Total thyroidectomy operative time was significantly longer than those of lobectomy and isthmusectomy (p < 0.001). In correlation analysis, a significantly positive correlation was observed between body mass index (BMI) and operative time (R2 = 0.04, p = 0.025). The TORT learning curve was 52 cases in the CUSUM operative time analysis. In the CUSUM surgical success rate chart, the turning point was the 55th case. Complication and procedure conversion rates were significantly decreased after the learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: The CUSUM learning curve of TORT was about 52-55 cases, and the operative time, total complication rate, and procedure conversion decreased significantly after the learning curve. The operative time was associated with the extent of thyroidectomy and BMI.

Detection of increased intracranial pressure in trans-oral robotic thyroidectomy using optic nerve sheath diameter measurement.

BACKGROUND: During transoral robot-assisted thyroidectomy, there is a risk of increasing intracranial pressure because the site of CO2 insufflation is narrow and close to the brain. METHODS: We analyzed the pre- to post-CO2 neck insufflation change in the optic nerve sheath diameter during transoral robot-assisted thyroidectomy. Changes in vital-signs, airway pressure, and arterial carbon dioxide pressure were analyzed along with postoperative complications. RESULTS: Among the 30 participants, the post-CO2 inflation mean optic nerve sheath diameter (5.64 ± 0.54 mm) was higher than the pre-induction diameter (4.81 ± 0.37 mm) with a mean difference of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-0.97; p < 0.001), but returned to baseline after CO2 deflation in most cases. One participant had sustained increased optic nerve sheath diameter (6.35 mm) associated with severe new-onset postoperative headache. CONCLUSION: Transient elevation in the intracranial pressure during low-pressure CO2 neck insufflation in the transoral robot-assisted thyroidectomy did not appear to adversely affect patients.

Comparative surgical outcomes of transoral endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes of patients with thyroid carcinoma who underwent transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) versus transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) were compared. METHODS: Patients who underwent TOETVA or TORT between July 2016 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. TOETVA and TORT groups were propensity score-matched (1:1) based on age, sex, body mass index, surgical extent, tumor size, and presence of thyroiditis. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients underwent transoral thyroidectomy (142 TOETVA and 43 TORT). Final diagnoses consisted of 135 papillary and seven follicular thyroid carcinomas in the TOETVA group and 43 papillary thyroid carcinomas in the TORT group (p = 0.138). Mean operative time was shorter for the TOETVA group than the TORT group (106.3 vs. 158.9 min, p < 0.001), whereas mean hospital stay was longer for the TOETVA group than the TORT group (2.2 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.031). After 1:1 propensity score matching, each group included 43 patients. Mean operative time was shorter in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (106.2 vs. 158.9 min, p < 0.001), whereas mean hospital stay was longer in the TOETVA group (2.3 vs. 1.9 days, p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in vocal cord palsy incidences between the groups (one transient, one permanent in the TOETVA group vs. none in the TORT group, p = 0.359). The learning curve was 71 cases for TOETVA and 25 cases for TORT. CONCLUSION: TOETVA had shorter mean operative time, and TORT had shorter learning curve and shorter mean hospital stay. Surgeons should be familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure.

Safety and Feasibility of Single-Port Trans-Axillary Robotic Thyroidectomy: Experience through Consecutive 100 Cases.

Background and Objectives: Recently, the single-port (SP) robotic system was introduced for minimally invasive operative techniques. Thus, this study aimed to validate the safety and feasibility of SP trans-axillary robotic thyroidectomy (SP-TART) through experiences in a single tertiary institution. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive patients who underwent SP-TART from October 2021 to June 2022 in Seoul St. Mary's Hospital in Seoul, Korea. We analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative outcomes, including complications. Results: Less than total thyroidectomy (LTT) was performed in 81, total thyroidectomy (TT) in 16, and TT with modified radical neck dissection (mRND) in 3 patients. The mean operation time (min) was 53.3 ± 13.7, 86.3 ± 15.1, and 245.7 ± 36.7 in LTT, TT, and TT with mRND, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.0 ± 0.2, 2.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.5 days, respectively. A total of 84 cases of thyroid cancer were included, and 97.6% of them (82 cases) were papillary carcinoma and the rest were follicular and poorly differentiated carcinomas. Regarding complications, five cases had major complications, including three cases of vocal cord palsy and two cases of transient hypoparathyroidism. Conclusions: SP-TART is safe and feasible with a short operation time and a short length of hospital stay.