Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 290
Filter
1.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955577

ABSTRACT

Patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) have a poor prognosis. In the randomised, double-blind phase 3 IMmotion010 trial (NCT03024996), adjuvant atezolizumab did not demonstrate a disease-free survival (DFS) benefit versus placebo in the overall population of patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence following surgery. This prespecified subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety was completed in 104 patients with sRCC. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms. At a median follow-up of 45 mo, the median DFS was not evaluable (NE; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12 mo-NE) in the atezolizumab arm (n = 37) and 23 mo (95% CI, 11-NE) in the placebo arm (n = 66; hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI, 0.44-1.4]). In the sRCC subgroup, grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in one patient (2.7%) in the atezolizumab arm and two patients (3.0%) in the placebo arm. By comparison, 54 of 353 patients (15%) and 16 of 317 patients (5.0%) with non-sarcomatoid histology reported grade 3/4 TRAEs in the respective arms. In conclusion, the difference in DFS was not statistically significant between adjuvant atezolizumab and placebo in patients with sRCC. The safety profile was similar between patients with sRCC and non-sRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with a specific type of locoregional kidney cancer (tumours with sarcomatoid features) were treated with atezolizumab or placebo after surgery. Slightly more patients treated with atezolizumab lived longer without the disease getting worse than those treated with placebo, although this finding was not statistically significant. The side effects were similar to those seen in patients with other types of kidney cancer treated with atezolizumab in the same study (IMmotion010). In patients with sarcomatoid kidney cancer, atezolizumab was tolerable and may be more effective than placebo, but this requires further study.

2.
World J Surg ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38955808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The superiority between remimazolam and propofol for anesthesia is controversial in elderly patients (≥60 years). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically compare anesthetic effect and safety profile between remimazolam and propofol in elderly patients under any surgery. METHODS: Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched until December 25, 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Ten studies with 806 patients receiving remimazolam (experimental group) and 813 patients receiving propofol (control group) were included. Time to loss of consciousness [standard mean difference (SMD) (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.347 (-0.362, 3.055), p = 0.122] and recovery time [SMD (95% CI): -0.022 (-0.300, 0.257), p = 0.879] were similar between experimental and control groups. Mean arterial pressure at baseline minus 1 min after induction [SMD (95% CI): -1.800 (-3.250, -0.349), p = 0.015], heart rate at baseline minus 1 min after induction [SMD (95% CI): -1.041 (-1.537, -0.545), p < 0.001], incidences of hypoxemia [relative risk (RR) (95% CI): 0.247 (0.138, 0.444), p < 0.001], respiratory depression [RR (95% CI): 0.458 (0.300, 0.700), p < 0.001], bradycardia [RR (95% CI): 0.409 (0.176, 0.954), p = 0.043], hypotension [RR (95% CI): 0.415 (0.241, 0.714), p = 0.007], and injection pain [RR (95% CI): 0.172 (0.113, 0.263), p < 0.001] were lower in the experimental group compared to the control group. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between groups [RR (95% CI): 1.194 (0.829, 1.718), p = 0.341]. Moreover, this meta-analysis displayed a low risk of bias, minimal publication bias, and good robustness. CONCLUSION: Remimazolam shows comparative anesthetic effect and better safety profile than propofol in elderly patients under any surgery.

3.
Heliyon ; 10(12): e32131, 2024 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988522

ABSTRACT

In this work, a set of eight technical lignin samples from various botanical origins and production processes were characterized for their chemical composition, higher heating value, size distribution, dust explosion sensitivity and severity, thermal hazard characteristics and biodegradability, in further support of their sustainable use. More specifically, safety-focused parameters have been assessed in terms of consistency with relating physico-chemical properties determined for the whole set of technical lignins. The results emphasized the heterogeneity and variability of technical lignins and the subsequent need for a comprehensive characterization of new lignin feedstocks arising from novel biorefineries. Indeed, significant differences were revealed between the samples in terms of hazards sensitivity. This first comparative physico-chemical safety profiling of technical lignins could be useful for the hazard analysis and the safe design of the facilities associated with large scale valorisation of biomass residues such as lignins, targeting "zero waste" sustainable conversion of bioresources.

4.
Cancer Res Treat ; 2024 Jul 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010796

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This multicenter, open-label, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of bortezomib combined with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in previously treated patients across 14 institutions in South Korea. Patients and Methods: Between September 2017 and July 2020, 29 patients with histologically confirmed CTCL received treatment, consisting of eight 4-week cycles of induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy, contingent upon response, for up to one year. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an objective global response. Results: Thirteen (44.8%) of the 29 patients achieved an objective global response, including two complete responses. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months, with responders showing a median PFS of 14.0 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild, with a low incidence of peripheral neuropathy and hematologic toxicities. Despite the trend toward shorter PFS in patients with higher mutation burdens, genomic profiling before and after treatment showed no significant emergence of new mutations indicative of disease progression. Conclusion: This study supports the use of bortezomib and dexamethasone as a viable and safe treatment option for previously treated CTCL, demonstrating substantial efficacy and manageability in adverse effects. Further research with a larger cohort is suggested to validate these findings and explore the prognostic value of mutation profiles.

5.
Oncol Lett ; 28(2): 352, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872864

ABSTRACT

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor revives the killing effect of immune cells to prevent tumor progression. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy vs. standard treatment in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A total of 51 patients with R/M OSCC were reviewed and divided into the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy (n=21) and standard treatment (n=30) groups based on their actual treatments. The results of the present study demonstrated that the objective response rate (52.4 vs. 36.7%, P=0.265) and disease control rate (81.0 vs. 70.0%, P=0.377) were numerically elevated in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with those in the standard treatment group; however, the results did not reach statistical significance. The progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically increased (without statistical significance) in the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.057). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] PFS duration of 6.7 (1.6-11.8) and 5.2 (3.4-7.0) months, respectively. In addition, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group demonstrated increased overall survival (OS) compared with that of the standard treatment group (P=0.032). Specifically, the PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group and the standard treatment group exhibited a median (95% CI) OS duration of 18.3 (11.9-24.7) and 10.3 (7.9-12.7) months, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy was independently associated with improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.308, P=0.002] and OS (HR=0.252, P=0.003). In addition, the incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) was relatively low in both groups and the incidence of any grade of each AE was not significantly different between groups (all P>0.050). In conclusion, the first-line PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy group had improved efficacy and comparable safety compared with those of the standard treatment in patients with R/M OSCC.

6.
J Pain Res ; 17: 2147-2153, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910592

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Minimally invasive sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion has become the mainstay treatment for chronic refractory sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Multiple procedures are now available including transfixing procedures with implants placed in the lateral or posterolateral transiliac trajectories, and intra-articular procedures with devices and/or allograft placed via a dorsal approach. To date, the published literature on the lateral approach has been primarily by surgeons. This retrospective chart review aims to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness when the procedure is performed by physicians trained in interventional pain management. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent lateral SI joint fusion using a lateral transiliac approach between December 2022 and September 2023 by a single physician. Data on demographics, perioperative details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed. The study was reviewed by WCG IRB and received an exemption authorization. Results: Medical charts were reviewed for the first 49 consecutive cases performed. Mean (SD, range) age was 64 (11, 34-83), BMI was 32.5 (8.4), 59% were female, 35% were smokers, and 82% were on opioids at baseline. Mean (SD) operative time was 40 (11) minutes and all procedures were performed at an ambulatory surgery center under monitored anesthesia care. No device- or procedure-related complications occurred. Mean follow up was 175 days; Mean (SD) baseline reported pain was 9 (1.5) on a 0-10 numerical rating scale. At follow up, 88% of the patients reported ≥50% pain relief. Six patients who reported 0% relief suffer from multiple pain generators and are on long term opioids. Conclusion: Results of this single center experience support the safety of lateral SI joint fusion using a threaded implant when performed by interventional pain management physicians. However, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are warranted to validate these findings.

7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918980

ABSTRACT

This article offers a thorough analysis of the contemporary application of Achras Sapota Linn, or sapodilla, in conventional medicine. Tropical fruit-bearing Achras Sapota Linn has long been used in many traditional medical systems. The study examines Achras Sapota Linn's phytochemical makeup and pharmacological characteristics with an emphasis on the plant's possible medical uses in the treatment of a range of illnesses. Moreover, it highlights the safety and efficacy characteristics of Achras Sapota Linn and talks about new research and clinical trials that back up its traditional applications. This study also discusses obstacles and potential avenues for further research and application of Achras Sapota Linn in contemporary medicine. All things considered, it emphasizes how important Achras Sapota Linn is to traditional medicine as a therapeutic resource.

8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830052

ABSTRACT

Atomoxetine is a drug widely used for the treatment of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with reduced risk of adverse motor reactions and chemical dependence. However, the pharmacokinetics characteristics as well as the toxicological risk of atomoxetine deserves further investigation to comprehensively analyze the therapeutic and safety aspects of this drug. This study aimed to predict the physicochemical profile and medicinal chemistry characteristics of atomoxetine, alongside its pharmacokinetic properties-namely absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion-as well as its toxicology (ADMET) potential through the utilization of web-based in silico tools. This research emphasizes predicted physicochemical, medicinal chemistry, and absorption parameters of atomoxetine that could influence the efficacy and safety of this drug for ADHD treatment. Additionally, atomoxetine also presents noteworthy predicted risks of hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, respiratory system toxicity, skin toxicity, and carcinogenicity. These findings underscore the necessity for further assessments of atomoxetine's safety profile, particularly considering different patient populations and durations of drug treatment. The data reported here from in silico predictions suggest that closer monitoring is warranted when atomoxetine is administered to patients with ADHD. Moreover, controlled studies detailing reliable protocols for personalized dosing, considering the multifactorial variability in metabolism efficiency and toxicological potential, would enable a more comprehensive assessment of atomoxetine's safety profile.

9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839575

ABSTRACT

AIM: Angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and improves the outcomes of patients with gynecologic malignancy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib plus chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (RPR-OC) patients. METHODS: This study retrieved 67 RPR-OC patients who received apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone and divided them into apatinib + chemo (N = 30) and chemo alone (N = 37) groups according to the actual medication. RESULTS: Objective response rate (36.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.056) and disease control rate (80.0% vs. 59.5%, p = 0.072) showed an increased trend in apatinib + chemo group versus chemo alone group. The progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.010) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.042) were prolonged in apatinib + chemo group versus chemo alone group. The median (95%confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 5.9 (5.5-6.3) months in apatinib + chemo group and 3.8 (2.0-5.6) months in chemo alone group. The median (95%CI) OS was 20.5 (16.5-24.5) months in apatinib + chemo group and 13.6 (8.6-18.6) months in chemo alone group. Apatinib plus chemotherapy was independently related with better PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.354, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.116, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients with a more serious disease condition might benefit more from apatinib plus chemotherapy. No difference was found in adverse events of all grade or grade ≥3 between the two groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Angiogenesis inhibitor apatinib plus chemotherapy shows better treatment efficacy than chemotherapy alone with controllable safety profile in RPR-OC patients.

10.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 19(1): 324, 2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38849859

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) and cognitive dysfunction (POCD) are common complications following thoracic surgery, particularly in patients aged 65 years and above. These complications can significantly affect recovery and increase healthcare costs. This study investigates the effects of low-dose S-ketamine on reducing POD and POCD in this patient demographic. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, medical records of patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent elective thoracic surgery from January 2019 to August 2023 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into S-ketamine and Control groups based on intraoperative S-ketamine exposure. POD was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), while cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months post-surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters, including hemodynamic stability, blood loss, pain scores, and ICU stay length, were also recorded. RESULTS: The study comprised 140 participants, with 70 in each group. The S-ketamine group demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of POD at 7 days post-surgery (12.0% vs. 26.7%, P < 0.001), and reduced POCD at 1 month (18.7% vs. 36.0%, P < 0.05) and 6 months (10.7% vs. 21.3%, P < 0.05). The Ketamine group had a significantly higher median MoCA score compared to the Control group both at 1 month (P = 0.021) and 6 months (P = 0.007). Adverse events, such as infection, bleeding, and respiratory failure, showed no significant differences between the groups, suggesting a safe profile for S-ketamine. CONCLUSION: Administering low-dose S-ketamine during thoracic surgery in patients aged 65 years and above significantly reduces the incidence of POD and POCD, highlighting its neuroprotective potential. These findings advocate for the inclusion of S-ketamine in anesthetic protocols to improve postoperative outcomes and reduce healthcare costs in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Ketamine , Postoperative Complications , Thoracic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Aged , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Delirium/prevention & control , Cognition/drug effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/prevention & control , Aged, 80 and over
11.
J Clin Neurosci ; 126: 173-181, 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924824

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a severe event often complicated by cerebral vasospasm (CV). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of clazosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, in reducing CV, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and the need for rescue therapy in aSAH patients, while evaluating its impact on functional outcomes and mortality. METHODS: We conducted a literature search across multiple databases to identify relevant studies evaluating the effects of clazosentan in aSAH patients. Both cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The primary outcomes were vasospasm incidence, moderate to severe vasospasm, DCI, and the need for rescue therapy. Secondary outcomes included functional outcomes, mortality, and adverse events. The data were pooled as Risk ratios (R/R) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 10 published and one unpublished, comprising 8,469 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Clazosentan significantly reduced the incidence of vasospasm (R/R = 0.49: 0.34-0.70), moderate to severe vasospasm (R/R = 0.53: 0.46-0.61), DCI (R/R = 0.70: 0.59-0.82), and the need for rescue therapy (R/R = 0.65: 0.52-0.83) compared to placebo. However, no significant improvement in functional outcomes or mortality rates was observed. Clazosentan was associated with increased rates of pulmonary adverse events (R/R = 1.89: 1.64-2.18), hypotension (R/R = 2.47: 1.79-3.42), and anemia (R/R = 1.49: 1.23-1.79) but no increased risk of hepatobiliary adverse events or cerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Clazosentan demonstrates efficacy in reducing vasospasm, moderate to severe vasospasm, DCI, and the need for rescue therapy in aSAH patients, but does not significantly improve functional outcomes or mortality rates. While associated with specific adverse events, clazosentan may be a valuable adjunctive therapy in the management of aSAH, particularly in a high-risk population for vasospasm.

12.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57581, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707079

ABSTRACT

Ciprofol is a recently developed, short-acting γ-aminobutyric acid receptor agonist sedative that is more potent than propofol. Still, there have been few clinical studies of this agent to date. This review explores alternative intravenous anesthesia options to ciprofol, considering their pharmacology, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and practical considerations. While ciprofol offers advantages such as rapid onset and predictable offset, concerns regarding its safety profile and individual variability in response have prompted the search for alternatives. Propofol, etomidate, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine are discussed as established options, each with unique characteristics and potential benefits. Emerging agents, including remimazolam, sufentanil, alfaxalone, and brexanolone, are examined for their potential role in anesthesia management. Recommendations for future research include large-scale comparative studies, optimization of dosing strategies, and personalized approaches guided by pharmacogenomic insights. Ultimately, the future of intravenous anesthesia lies in a multifaceted approach that integrates evidence-based practices, technological innovations, and individualized patient care to enhance safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction across the perioperative continuum. Collaboration among stakeholders will be crucial in advancing the field and shaping the future landscape of intravenous anesthesia options.

13.
Oncol Lett ; 28(1): 319, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807677

ABSTRACT

Leuprorelin acetate microspheres, a common gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, have certain clinical benefits for prostate cancer (PCa). The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of generic and branded leuprorelin acetate microspheres in patients with PCa. The present retrospective, observational study included 116 patients with PCa who received generic (Boennuokang®; Beijing Biote Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) or branded (Enantone®; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.) leuprorelin acetate microspheres via injection (commonly 3.75 mg once every 4 weeks), defined as the test (n=64) and reference (n=52) groups, respectively. The present study showed that testosterone levels at month (M) 3 (P<0.001), M6 (P=0.012) and M12 (P<0.001) were decreased in the test group compared with the reference group. However, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels at baseline, M1, M3, M6 and M12 were not significantly different between the test and reference groups (all P>0.05). The median (interquartile range) testosterone and PSA levels at M12 were 15.50 ng/dl (10.00-31.25 ng/dl) and 0.01 ng/ml (0.01-0.10 ng/ml), respectively, in the test group and 28.00 ng/dl (22.00-37.00 ng/dl) and 0.02 ng/ml (0.01-0.16 ng/ml), respectively, in the reference group. No significant differences were observed in the M1-baseline, M3-baseline, M6-baseline and M12-baseline changes of testosterone or PSA levels between the two groups (all P>0.050). Additionally, the incidence of all adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (all P>0.050). Overall, Boennuokang® leuprorelin acetate microspheres exhibited a similar efficacy for suppression of testosterone and PSA levels with a comparable safety profile compared with Enantone® leuprorelin acetate microspheres in patients with PCa.

14.
Dermatol Clin ; 42(3): 399-404, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796271

ABSTRACT

Phototherapy has utility as a psoriatic therapy, given its relatively high clinical efficacy, low side effect profile, and lower cost compared to newer effective treatments like biologics and small molecules. Phototherapy has shown Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-75 and PASI-90 rates comparable to those of biologics and small molecules, with similarly rapid onsets of action, rates of remission, and quality of life scores. Certain patients may particularly benefit from phototherapy, such as those with localized disease or contraindications to systemic immunomodulatory medication. Phototherapy can be more cost-effective than biologics and conveniently administered at home, making it a valuable therapeutic option for the right patient.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Phototherapy , Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Phototherapy/methods , Severity of Illness Index , PUVA Therapy/methods , Ultraviolet Therapy/methods
15.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 15(1): 146, 2024 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38764070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Based on previous in vivo studies and human trials, intrathecal cell delivery is a safe and relevant therapeutic tool for improving patient's quality of life with neurological conditions. We aimed to characterise the safety profile of intrathecally delivered Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, KCI-Korean Journal Database, and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception until April 13, 2023. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared intrathecal delivery of MSCs to controls in adult populations were included. Adverse events (AEs) were pooled and meta-analysed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with a correction factor 0.5 added to studies with zero count cells. Pooled AEs were described using Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Then, a random-effects meta-regress model on study-level summary data was performed to explore the relationship between the occurrence of AEs and covariates thought to modify the overall effect estimate. Finally, publication bias was assessed. RESULTS: 303 records were reviewed, and nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis (n = 540 patients). MSCs delivered intrathecally, as compared to controls, were associated with an increased probability of AEs of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (categorised by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-CTCAE version 5.0) (RR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.19, I2 = 0%). The random-effects meta-regress model suggested that fresh MSCs increased the probability of occurrence of AEs compared to cryopreserved MSCs (RR: 1.554; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 1.004-2.404), and the multiple-dose, decreased the probability of AEs by 36% compared to single doses (RR: 0.644; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 0.416-0.996); however, univariate random effects meta-regression models revealed a not significant association between the occurrence of AEs from MSCs intrathecal delivery and each covariate. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal delivery of MSCs was associated with a slight increase in AEs associated with musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, albeit without serious AEs. We conclude that intrathecal MSCs delivery is safe for patients with neurological conditions. However, further high-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Injections, Spinal , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Nervous System Diseases , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology
16.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(4): 104329, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by a type 2 pattern of inflammation. Mepolizumab was approved for the treatment of CRSwNP in 2021, it may be useful to evaluate its safety profile in a real-world setting. AIM: This work aimed to prospectively highlight the effectiveness and safety profile of Mepolizumab in patients with CRSwNP enrolled in the Otorhinolaryngology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina. METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out considering all patients treated with Mepolizumab. A descriptive analysis was conducted reporting all demographic characteristics, endoscopic evaluations, and symptom conditions. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were treated with Mepolizumab, one patient discontinued the treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Tests-22 (SNOT-22) and nasal polyp score (NPS) was shown at the 6th and 12th months compared to baseline values (SNOT-22, -33 and - 43, p < 0.001 for both comparisons; NPS, 0 and - 1, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The median (Q1-Q3) sniffin' sticks test score increased from 7 (6-8) at the 6th month to 11 (10-13) at the 12th month. Seven patients (24.1 %) reported pain at the injection site, accompanied by redness, warmth, and tenderness within the first 24 h post-injection with a median duration of three days from the onset. CONCLUSIONS: Given the optimal treatment response and the minimal adverse effects observed, clinicians should consider Mepolizumab a safe and effective treatment in CRSwNP patients. Further studies in real-life setting are necessary to better understand the long-term effects.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/complications , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/complications , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Rhinitis/complications , Male , Female , Chronic Disease , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Healthcare , Cohort Studies , Aged , Sino-Nasal Outcome Test , Rhinosinusitis
17.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 371, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755677

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to conduct an exhaustive evaluation of Vilazodone's safety in clinical application and to unearth the potential adverse event (AE) risks associated with its utilization based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: This research employed data spanning from the first quarter of 2011 to the third quarter of 2023 from the FAERS database. Various signal detection methodologies, including the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM), were utilized to ascertain the correlation between Vilazodone and specific AEs. RESULTS: The study compiled a total of 17,439,268 reports of drug AEs, out of which 5,375 were related to Vilazodone. Through signal mining, 125 Preferred Terms (PTs) encompassing 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were identified. The findings indicated a higher prevalence among females and patients within the 45 to 65 age bracket. The principal categories of AEs included Psychiatric disorders, Nervous system disorders, and Gastrointestinal disorders, with prevalent incidents of Diarrhoea, Nausea, and Insomnia. Moreover, the study identified robust signals of novel potential AEs, notably in areas such as sleep disturbances (Sleep paralysis, Hypnagogic hallucination, Rapid eye movements sleep abnormal, Sleep terror, Terminal insomnia, Tachyphrenia), sexual dysfunctions (Female orgasmic disorder, Orgasm abnormal, Disturbance in sexual arousal, Spontaneous penile erection, Anorgasmia, Sexual dysfunction, Ejaculation delayed), and other symptoms and injuries (Electric shock sensation, Violence-related symptom, Gun shot wound). CONCLUSION: Although Vilazodone presents a positive prospect in the management of MDD, the discovery of AEs linked to its use, particularly the newly identified potential risks such as sleep and sexual dysfunctions, necessitates heightened vigilance among clinicians.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Vilazodone Hydrochloride , Humans , Vilazodone Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Male , Female , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Databases, Factual , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult , Adolescent , Bayes Theorem
18.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38580867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This pioneering study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and Aesthetic outcomes of Ergonomix2 Motiva Ergonomic Implants in breast augmentation. It aims to assess their capability to offer more natural touch and dynamics, delineate the learning curve for surgical techniques, and examine their safety profile compared to Ergonomix1 implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, comparing 31 patients who received Ergonomix2 implants with a control group of 51 patients with Ergonomix1 implants. Eligible patients were those seeking Aesthetic breast augmentation without prior surgeries or chronic illnesses. Detailed documentation of surgical techniques, implant characteristics, and patient demographics was performed. The study assessed surgical learning curve, implant positioning accuracy, and short-term and early complications. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using the BreastQ questionnaire and quantitative elastography. RESULTS: Patients with Ergonomix2 implants showed significant improvements in Aesthetic outcomes, including breast contour symmetry and natural feel. The learning curve demonstrated a decrease in surgical time and higher implant positioning accuracy. The safety profile was favorable, with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction levels. Ergonomix2 implants exhibited enhanced softness and pliability, closely mimicking natural breast tissue, as confirmed by elastographic analyzes. CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomix2 implants represent a significant advancement in Aesthetic breast surgery, offering natural-feeling and dynamically adaptable outcomes. Despite the promising results, the need for specialized surgical techniques and further research on long-term safety and efficacy is emphasized. This study contributes foundational knowledge to the field of ergonomic breast implants and their application in modern plastic surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

19.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ; 17(4)2024 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675408

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a global health concern and reducing plasma LDL-C levels is a major goal in cardiovascular prevention. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nutraceutical formulation including leucoselect® phytosome®, red yeast rice, policosanol and folic acid on LDL-c levels in patients at low cardiovascular risk with dyslipidemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all consecutive patients with dyslipidemia at low cardiovascular risk who were unresponsive to diet and physical activity. Clinical assessments and laboratory analyses, encompassing lipid profile, hepatic function, and CPK levels, were performed at baseline prior to initiating treatment and repeated at the 12-week mark following administration of the study nutraceutical. RESULTS: Sixty (60) consecutive patients (mean age 48.02 ± 10.1 years; 60% male) were included. At the 12-week follow-up, a statistically significant reduction in Total Cholesterol (13.1%) and LDL-c serum level (20.4%) was observed. Hepatic and muscular function remain stable over the time. The adherence to therapy was 99% and the persistence was maximum. CONCLUSIONS: The nutraceutical formulation including leucoselect® phytosome® red yeast rice, policosanol and folic acid significantly reduced the LDL-c plasma levels, consistent with previous research showing that the bioactive component in red yeast rice-lovastatin-is effective in addressing problems with lipid metabolism. Importantly, it was safe and well-tolerated among patients with dyslipidemia in a real-world setting.

20.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 12(7)2024 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38610222

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES AND AIM: The primary aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) and phenobarbital (PB) as first-line treatments for neonatal seizure management. This study was designed to measure and compare the incidence of adverse effects and to determine the discharge and mortality rates associated with the use of these antiseizure medications (ASMs). Through this comparison, this research sought to provide insights to optimise care for neonates experiencing seizures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated 104 neonates treated for seizures at Zeynep Kamil Hospital from 2015 to 2020 after excluding those on non-PB/LEV antiseizure medications. Seizures were characterised using electroencephalogram (EEG) and categorised according to aetiology and frequency. Treatment efficacy was gauged by seizure cessation, as confirmed using EEG. Adverse effects and demographic data were recorded. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, employing the Shapiro-Wilk, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, 104 neonates treated with first-line ASM were evaluated for efficacy; PB was administered in 68.26% of the cases, while LEV was utilised in 31.74%. The total complete response rate was 40.38%, with no significant difference between the PB and LEV groups (p = 0.309). The incidence rate ratios (IRRs) demonstrated that seizure frequency profoundly influenced treatment effectiveness, with IRRs of 2.09 for rare seizures, 3.25 for frequent seizures, and 4.01 for status epilepticus, indicating a higher treatment response rate with increasing seizure frequency. For second-line treatment, among a subset of 62 patients, PB had a slight, non-significant advantage over LEV, with an odds ratio of 1.09, suggesting a marginally better response to LEV. Adverse events were significantly more frequent in the PB group, affecting 19 of 67 neonates (28.36%), compared to only 2 of 71 neonates (2.82%) in the LEV group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the discharge rates between the two groups (PB, 67.61%; LEV, 75.76%; p = 0.674). Interestingly, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the LEV group (45.45%) than that in the PB group (22.54%; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: This study underscores LEV's superior safety profile over PB in neonatal seizure management, evidenced by a significantly lower rate of adverse events. PB seems to be more effective in the second-line treatment of neonatal seizures. Despite the lack of significant differences in the discharge rates, the higher mortality rate associated with LEV warrants further investigation. These findings advocate the cautious selection of antiepileptic drugs in neonatal care, with a preference for LEV based on its safety profile.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...