Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 62
Filter
1.
Prev Vet Med ; 230: 106277, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991427

ABSTRACT

Due to its increasing occurrence in cattle farms in various countries, leading to significant economic losses in affected livestock, Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin) has become a highly investigated pathogen in cattle production. In Austria, there have been occasional human cases of S. Dublin as well as an increase in laboratory-confirmed cases in cattle, indicating the need for a screening programme to determine the current status in Austria. The aims of this study were, firstly, to determine the seroprevalence of S. Dublin in dairy herds through bulk milk screenings in two federal states (Salzburg, Tyrol) of Austria. Secondly, the study aimed to identify the infection status of the herds through individual animal and herd level detection, comparing microbiological, molecular and serological detection methods. The results of the study will allow the development of a sampling strategy for a surveillance programme in Austria. A total of 6973 dairy farms were tested through serological bulk milk screening. The seroprevalence for the federal state of Tyrol was 14.8 % and for Salzburg it was 18.2 %, resulting in an average seroprevalence of 16.5 %. At an individual animal level, 205 (11.3 %) animals tested positive for shedding of S. Dublin in the faeces through microbiological detection, and 268 (17.0 %) animals had positive values (ct value ≤ 38) by qPCR. The association between microbiological and molecular detection was statistically significant (p < 0.001), with a calculated kappa value of 0.65 ± 0.27 (p ≤ 0.001), assuming a substantial level of agreement. In 17 herds, where an individual animal tested positive for shedding of S. Dublin, environmental sampling and testing were carried out. At a herd level 16 (94.1 %) out of the 17 participating herds, tested positive for S. Dublin either microbiologically or by molecular assay in boot swab samples. Bulk milk samples from 14 out of the 17 participating herds were analysed for antibodies to S. Dublin and 12 samples (85.7 %) were positive. In total 111 (18.9 %) out of 587 blood samples tested positive for S. Dublin antibodies, demonstrating a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.001) both with microbiological (κ = 0.32 ± 0.49; p ≤ 0.001) and molecular (κ=0.23 ± 0.06; p ≤ 0.001) findings. It was possible to identify S. Dublin by culture from boot swabs in 14 (82.4 %) out of 17 herds and by molecular assay using qPCR in 15 (88.2 %) out of 17 herds, indicating a suitable sample type for screening on a herd level-basis for acute infections, but not for identifying chronic infections or asymptomatic carriers. Other environmental samples, such as sponge-sticks, are only suitable to a limited extent for the detection of S. Dublin. The results of this study demonstrate a moderate S. Dublin prevalence in dairy herds in the selected Austrian regions, signalling further screening and management programmes for the future.

2.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825106

ABSTRACT

Endemic infectious diseases remain a major challenge for dairy producers worldwide. For effective disease control programs, up-to-date prevalence estimates are of utmost importance. The objective of this study was to estimate the herd-level prevalence of bovine leukemia virus (BLV), Salmonella Dublin, and Neospora caninum in dairy herds in Alberta, Canada using a serial cross-sectional study design. Bulk tank milk samples from all Alberta dairy farms were collected 4 times, in December 2021 (n = 489), April 2022 (n = 487), July 2022 (n = 487), and October 2022 (n = 480), and tested for antibodies against BLV, S. Dublin, and N. caninum using ELISAs. Herd-level apparent prevalence was calculated as positive samples divided by total tested samples at each time point. A mixed effect modified Poisson regression model was employed to assess the association of prevalence with region, herd size, herd type, and type of milking system. Apparent prevalence of BLV was 89.4, 88.7, 86.9 and 86.9% in December, April, July, and October, respectively, whereas for S. Dublin apparent prevalence was 11.2, 6.6, 8.6, and 8.5%, and for N. caninum apparent prevalence was 18.2, 7.4, 7.8, and 15.0%. For BLV, S. Dublin and N. caninum, a total of 91.7, 15.6, and 28.1% of herds, respectively, were positive at least once, whereas 82.5, 3.6, and 3.0% of herds were ELISA-positive at all 4 times. Compared with the north region, central Alberta had a high prevalence (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.13) of BLV-antibody positive herds, whereas south Alberta had a high prevalence (PR = 2.56) of herds positive for S. Dublin antibodies. Furthermore, central (PR = 0.52) and south regions (PR = 0.46) had low prevalence of N. caninum-positive herds compared with the north. Hutterite colony herds were more frequently BLV-positive (PR = 1.13) but less frequently N. caninum-positive (PR = 0.47). Large herds (>7,200 L/day milk delivered ∼ > 250 cows) were 1.1 times more often BLV-positive, whereas small herds (≤3,600 L/day milk delivered ∼ ≤ 125 cows) were 3.2 times more often N. caninum-positive. For S. Dublin, Hutterite-colony herds were less frequently (PR = 0.07) positive than non-colony herds only in medium and large stratum but not in small stratum. Moreover, larger herds were more frequently (PR = 2.20) S. Dublin-positive than smaller herds only in non-colony stratum but not in colony stratum. Moreover, N. caninum prevalence was 1.6 times higher on farms with conventional milking systems compared with farms with an automated milking system. These results provide up-to-date information of the prevalence of these infections that will inform investigations of within-herd prevalence of these infections and help in devising evidence-based disease control strategies.

3.
Prev Vet Med ; 228: 106234, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38823251

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of infectious diseases at herd level can be challenging as different stakeholders can have conflicting priorities. The current study proposes a "proof of concept" of an approach that considers a reasonable number of criteria to rank plausible diagnostic strategies using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods. The example of Salmonella Dublin diagnostic in Québec dairy herds is presented according to two epidemiological contexts: (i) in herds with no history of S. Dublin infection and absence of clinical signs, (ii) in herds with a previous history of infection, but absence of clinical signs at the moment of testing. Multiple multiparty exchanges were conducted to determine: 1) stakeholders' groups; 2) the decision problem; 3) solutions to the problem (options) or diagnostic strategies to be ordered; 4) criteria and indicators; 5) criteria weights; 6) the construction of a performance matrix for each option; 7) the multi-criteria analyses using the visual preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations approach; 8) the sensitivity analyses, and 9) the final decision. A total of nine people from four Québec's organizations (the dairy producers provincial association along with the DHI company, the ministry of agriculture, the association of veterinary practitioners, and experts in epidemiology) composed the MCDA team. The decision problem was "What is the optimal diagnostic strategy for establishing the status of a dairy herd for S. Dublin infection when there are no clinical signs of infection?". Fourteen diagnostic strategies composed of the three following parameters were considered: 1) biological samples (bulk tank milk or blood from 10 heifers aged over three months); 2) sampling frequencies (one to three samples collection visits); 3) case definitions to conclude to a positive status using imperfect milk- or blood-ELISA tests. The top-ranking diagnostic strategy was the same in the two contexts: testing the bulk tank milk and the blood samples, all samples collected during one visit and the herd being assigned a S. Dublin positive status if one sample is ELISA-positive. The final decision favored the top-ranking option for both contexts. This MCDA approach and its application to S. Dublin infection in dairy herds allowed a consensual, rational, and transparent ranking of feasible diagnostic strategies while taking into account the diagnostic tests accuracy, socio-economic, logistic, and perception considerations of the key actors in the dairy industry. This promising tool can be applied to other infectious diseases that lack a well-established diagnostic procedure to define a herd status.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Dairying , Decision Support Techniques , Salmonella Infections, Animal , Animals , Cattle , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Quebec/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Female , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification
4.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788850

ABSTRACT

An increasing number of countries are investigating options to stop the spread of the emerging zoonotic infection Salmonella (S.) Dublin, which mainly spreads among bovines and with cattle manure. Detailed surveillance and cattle movement data from an 11-year period in Denmark provided an opportunity to gain new knowledge for mitigation options through a combined social network and simulation modeling approach. The analysis revealed similar network trends for non-infected and infected cattle farms despite stringent cattle movement restrictions imposed on infected farms in the national control program. The strongest predictive factor for farms becoming infected was their cattle movement activities in the previous month, with twice the effect of local transmission. The simulation model indicated an endemic S. Dublin occurrence, with peaks in outbreak probabilities and sizes around observed cattle movement activities. Therefore, pre- and post-movement measures within a 1-mo time-window may help reduce S. Dublin spread.

5.
J Dairy Sci ; 107(7): 5029-5040, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428494

ABSTRACT

We investigated the prevalence and spatial distribution of selected pathogens associated with infectious diseases of dairy cattle in Ontario, Canada. The cross-sectional study surveyed bulk tank milk for antibodies against bovine leukemia virus (BLV), Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP), and Salmonella Dublin, and for the presence of mastitis pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Mycoplasma bovis). Between October 2021 and June 2022, bulk tank milk samples were obtained from every commercial dairy farm in Ontario (n = 3,286). Samples underwent ELISA testing for the presence of BLV, MAP, and S. Dublin antibodies, and quantitative PCR testing for the detection of specific antigens of pathogens associated with mastitis. Bayesian models were used to estimate prevalence, and spatial analysis was carried out to identify regional clusters of high pathogen prevalence. Prevalence varied for different pathogens, and BLV was widespread across dairy farms in Ontario, with an estimated prevalence of 88.3%. The prevalence of MAP, Staph. aureus and S. Dublin in Ontario dairy herds was 39.8%, 31.5%, and 5.1%, respectively. The vast majority of dairy herds in Ontario were free of intramammary infections caused by Strep. agalactiae and M. bovis. Clusters of increased positive test rates were detected for S. Dublin, MAP, and Staph. aureus, indicating potential geographic risk factors for pathogen transmission. For S. Dublin, an area of increased test positivity rates was detected in southwestern Ontario, close to the Canada-United States border where most of the dairy herds in Ontario are located. Conversely, a localized cluster of positive test outcomes involving 14 subdivisions located in the southeastern region of Ontario was detected for Staph. aureus. Findings from our survey highlight the importance of the testing of aggregated samples and conducting spatial analysis as part of disease surveillance programs, and for implementing risk-based trading approaches among dairy producers.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Milk , Animals , Cattle , Ontario/epidemiology , Prevalence , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Milk/microbiology , Mastitis, Bovine/epidemiology , Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Communicable Diseases/veterinary , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis/isolation & purification , Dairying , Streptococcus agalactiae/isolation & purification
6.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 21(1): 19-26, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855926

ABSTRACT

Salmonella Dublin and Campylobacter spp. are two foodborne pathogens of importance. A small number of studies reported that consumption of veal liver was associated with an increased risk of human illness from these two pathogens. To better characterize the risk of exposure from liver, a cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of white veal calf liver contamination with these two pathogens and to characterize the antimicrobial non-susceptibility patterns of isolates. Veal liver samples were collected at two slaughterhouses in Quebec, Canada, in 2016 and 2017. Samples were submitted for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening followed by culture of Salmonella and thermotolerant Campylobacter. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using broth microdilution. Salmonella Dublin was the only serotype cultured from 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-7.9) of 560 liver samples. Among them and for technical reasons, 498 were tested by PCR for Campylobacter. The prevalence of PCR-positive livers was estimated to be 65.8% (95% CI: 58.7-72.9) for Campylobacter jejuni and 7.0% (95% CI: 3.9-10.1%) for Campylobacter coli. Fourteen Salmonella Dublin isolates were submitted for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) testing; all were non-susceptible to at least eight antimicrobials from six different classes. Most (81.4%) of the 188 C. jejuni isolates submitted for AMR testing were non-susceptible to tetracycline, and 23.0% of isolates were non-susceptible to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin. Of the seven C. coli isolates, four were multidrug resistant. This study highlights the importance of veal liver as a potential source of exposure to multidrug-resistant Salmonella Dublin and thermotolerant Campylobacter spp.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections , Campylobacter jejuni , Campylobacter , Red Meat , Animals , Cattle , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Quebec/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Salmonella , Liver , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary
7.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1276360, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38076251

ABSTRACT

Background: Salmonella Dublin is a zoonotic pathogen that is associated with invasive infections and high morbidity and mortality rates. Here we present the case of a 78-year-old man with a rare manifestation of a paravertebral abscess in the thoracolumbar spine caused by Salmonella Dublin. Case presentation: The patient had a history of spinal tuberculosis and poorly controlled diabetes. The abscess was successfully managed by drainage, and a 12-week course of moxifloxacin resulted in complete recovery. Salmonella Dublin was identified using culture-based serotyping. The patient resided in an environment where cattle farming is common; he consumed raw beef and unpasteurized milk, suggesting a potential source of infection. Discussion: Increasing the awareness of Salmonella Dublin as a potential cause of spinal abscesses is important, particularly in patients with structural spinal abnormalities. The timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy based on susceptibility testing is recommended. This case highlights the pathogenic potential of Salmonella Dublin and emphasizes the importance of effectively managing invasive Salmonella infections.

8.
Prev Vet Med ; 220: 106048, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37890216

ABSTRACT

There is currently no perfect test for determining herd-level status for Salmonella Dublin in dairy cattle herds. Our objectives were to evaluate the accuracy, predictive ability, and misclassification cost term of different testing scenarios using repeated measurements for establishing the S. Dublin herd status. Diagnostic strategies investigated used repeated bulk tank milk antibody-ELISA tests, repeated rounds of blood antibody-ELISA tests on non-lactating animals or a combination of both approaches. Two populations hypothesized to have different S. Dublin prevalences were included: (i) a convenience sample of 302 herds with unknown history of infection; and (ii) a cohort of 58 herds that previously tested positive to S. Dublin. Bulk milk samples were collected monthly for 6-7 months and serum were obtained from 10 young animals on two occasions, at the beginning and end of bulk milk sampling period. A series of Bayesian latent class models for two populations and comparing two tests were used to compare bulk milk-based to serum-based strategies. Moreover, Monte Carlo simulations were used to compared diagnostic strategies combining both types of samples. For each diagnostic strategy, we estimated the predictive values using two theoretical prevalences (0.05 and 0.25). Misclassification cost term was also estimated for each strategy using these two prevalences and a few relevant false-negative to false-positive cost ratios. When used for screening a population with an expected low prevalence of disease, for instance for screening herds with no clinical signs and no previous S. Dublin history, a diagnostic strategy consisting of two visits at 6 months interval, and with herd considered positive if bulk milk PP% ≥ 35 and/or ≥ 1/10 animals are positive on one or both visits could be used to confidently rule-out S. Dublin infection (median negative predictive value of 0.99; 95% Bayesian credible intervals, 95BCI: 0.98, 1.0). With this approach, however, positive results should later be confirmed with more specific tests to confirm whether S. Dublin is truly present (median positive predictive value of 0.36; 95BCI: 0.22, 0.57). The same diagnostic strategy could also be used confidently to reassess the S. Dublin status in herds with a previous S. Dublin history. When use for such a purpose, the predictive value of a positive result could be greatly improved, from 0.78 (95BCI: 0.65, 0.90) to 0.99 (95BCI: 0.94, 1.0) by requiring ≥ 1 positive result on both visits, rather than at any of the two visits.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Salmonella Infections, Animal , Humans , Cattle , Animals , Milk/chemistry , Bayes Theorem , Antibodies, Bacterial/analysis , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunoglobulins
9.
Vet Microbiol ; 286: 109885, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812833

ABSTRACT

Calf-diarrhoea is a major health problem in dairy calves and a primary reason for use of antimicrobials. We aimed to investigate the effect of feeding milk fermented with a combination of four probiotic bacterial strains to young-calves on; occurrence of diarrhoea and associated-pathogens (bacteria, virus and parasites), shedding of Salmonella Dublin and Campylobacter, occurrence of virulence genes linked to Clostridium perfringens, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC), as well as growth performance. For this, 143 new-born calves from three Danish dairy-farms were allocated into Treatment- (fed the fermented milk for the first 8-weeks-of-life) and Control-groups (fed regular farm-milk). Diarrhoea was observed in 18.6 % (Farm 1), 22.4 % (Farm 2) and 15.7 % (Farm 3) of the total registrations mainly within the first 3-weeks-of-life. C. perfringens was the most frequently detected pathogen. The treatment did not affect the occurrence of virulence genes linked to STEC and C. perfringens and, overall, their detection levels were very low/undetected. The statistical model applied found no significant effect of the treatment on prevalence of early-diarrhoea (≤ 3 weeks), late-diarrhoea (>3 weeks), occurrence of C. perfringens and Cryptosporidium parvum or levels of Campylobacter spp. Limited detection of the other pathogens and associated virulence-genes under study, did not allow for assessment of the impact of the treatment on their occurrence. Notably, the feeding-approach showed a significant detrimental effect on daily-weight-gain. The inefficacy of the treatment may be associated with the complexity of influencing factors under field conditions including management practices.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Cryptosporidiosis , Cryptosporidium , Diarrhea , Animals , Cattle , Escherichia coli , Cryptosporidiosis/epidemiology , Milk/microbiology , Diarrhea/microbiology , Diarrhea/veterinary , Bacteria , Clostridium perfringens/genetics , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Dairying
10.
J Dairy Sci ; 106(12): 9426-9439, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37641251

ABSTRACT

Salmonella Dublin is an emerging pathogen on dairy farms in Canada. In Ontario, Salmonella Dublin has been increasingly isolated from diagnostic laboratory samples. The objective of this observational cross-sectional study was to identify management practices associated with herd positivity for Salmonella Dublin. A convenience sample of 100 dairy farms was visited in Ontario, Canada, from April to August 2022. Farms were visited once to collect blood samples from 20 heifers between 4 and 24 mo old, sample bulk tank milk, and administer an in-person questionnaire on management practices. An additional bulk tank milk sample was collected before the visit by milk transporters. All bulk tank and serum samples underwent ELISA testing to determine Salmonella Dublin positivity (≥35% positivity on ELISA). Of the 1,990 heifers sampled, 44 (2.2%) animals were seropositive for Salmonella Dublin. At least one seropositive heifer was identified on 24% of participating farms. Based on the bulk tank milk samples collected during both sampling periods, 4% of farms were positive for Salmonella Dublin. Overall, of the 100 farms visited, 25% were classified as Salmonella Dublin positive, meaning at least one serum or bulk tank sample was interpreted as positive. A multivariable logistic regression model identified 5 factors associated with herd-level positivity for Salmonella Dublin. Specifically, introducing purchased animals within the last 2 years increased the likelihood that farms were positive for Salmonella Dublin (odds ratio [OR] = 4.6). Farms that had at least one animal leave the premises for a cattle show, embryo collection center, or loan to another farm and return within the last 2 years were also at a higher risk for Salmonella Dublin (OR = 4.9). Farms that removed manure from the surface of bedding in calving pens twice per month or after every calving were at greater risk for Salmonella Dublin than farms that removed manure less frequently (OR = 8.5). Farms that added bedding material to calving areas once or twice weekly were at lower risk for Salmonella Dublin compared with farms that added bedding less than once weekly (OR = 0.1). In addition, farms that kept 3 cows or less per pen in the calving area were at lower risk for Salmonella Dublin. Test positivity for Salmonella Dublin among Ontario dairy farms sampled is high, and dairy producers should consider avoiding management practices that are associated with an increased risk of Salmonella Dublin infection.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Farms , Manure , Salmonella , Animals , Cattle , Female , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Dairying , Milk , Ontario/epidemiology , Risk Factors
11.
Infect Genet Evol ; 113: 105475, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37394050

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin is highly adapted to cattle and a relatively rare cause of human infections. In Denmark S. Dublin has been endemic in the cattle population for many years. A national surveillance program in the cattle population was established at herd-level to reduce the occurrence of S. Dublin. In this study, we analyzed 421 S. Dublin genomes from cattle and food in order to determine the trend of S. Dublin's population size over time in Denmark and the impact of intervention in the cattle industry on the bacterial population size. A phylogenetic tree based on SNPs exhibited two major clades and one small cluster. All isolates were ST10. The temporal phylogenetic tree for the S. Dublin isolates showed that the most recent common ancestor was estimated to be in ∼1980 for the two major clades. An effective population size over time based on a Bayesian skyline plot showed that the population size of S. Dublin decreased significantly between 2014 and 2019 in both major clades. This result was concordant with the decrease of infected human cases by S. Dublin in Denmark. The strengthening of a surveillance program in Denmark could be the cause for the reduction of S. Dublin's effective population size. This study showed that whole genome sequencing combined with computer intensive phylogenetic analysis estimating the effective size of the S. Dublin's population over time is a strongly relevant measure with respect to assessing the impact of control measures aiming to reduce the bacterial population in the reservoir and the risk for human infection.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Salmonella Infections, Animal , Salmonella enterica , Animals , Humans , Cattle , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Phylogeny , Bayes Theorem , Salmonella enterica/genetics , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Denmark/epidemiology
12.
Front Vet Sci ; 10: 1081611, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303731

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin) is a host-adapted serovar causing enteritis and/or systemic diseases in cattle. As the serovar is not host-restricted, it may cause infections in other animals, including humans with severe illness and higher mortality rates than other non-typhoidal serovars. As human infections are mainly caused by contaminated milk, milk products and beef, information on the genetic relationship of S. Dublin strains from cattle and food should be evaluated. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of 144 S. Dublin strains from cattle and 30 strains from food origin was performed. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) revealed mostly sequence type ST-10 from both, cattle and food isolates. In total, 14 of 30 strains from food origin were clonally related to at least one strain from cattle, as detected by core-genome single nucleotide polymorphisms typing as well as core-genome MLST. The remaining 16 foodborne strains fit into the genome structure of S. Dublin in Germany without outliers. WGS proved to be a powerful tool not only to gain information on the epidemiology of Salmonella strains but also to detect clonal relations between organisms isolated from different stages of production. This study has shown a high genetic correlation between S. Dublin strains from cattle and food and, therefore, the potential to cause human infections. S. Dublin strains of both origins share an almost identical set of virulence factors, emphasizing their potential to cause severe clinical manifestations in animals, but also in humans and thus the need for effective control of S. Dublin in a farm-to-fork strategy.

13.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 254: 114735, 2023 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36907088

ABSTRACT

Salmonella is a well-known bacterium that causes waterborne diseases in humans and primates. The need for test models to detect such pathogens and study the responses of such organisms to induced toxic environments is vital. Daphnia magna has been ubiquitously used in aquatic life monitoring for decades because of outstanding properties, such as facile cultivation, short lifespan, and high reproductive capacity. In this study, the proteomic response of D. magna exposed to four Salmonella strains (Salmonella dublin, Salmonella enteritidis, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella typhimurium) was characterized. As indicated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, vitellogenin fused with superoxide dismutase was completely suppressed under exposure to S. dublin. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of using the vitellogenin 2 gene as a biomarker for S. dublin detection, particularly in providing rapid, visual detection through fluorescent signals. Accordingly, the applicability of the HeLa cells transfected with pBABE-Vtg2B-H2B-GFP as a biomarker for the detection of S. dublin was evaluated, and it was confirmed that the fluorescence signal decreased only when S. dublin was treated. Therefore, such HeLa cells can be utilized as a novel biomarker for detecting S. dublin.


Subject(s)
Daphnia , Vitellogenins , Animals , Humans , Daphnia/genetics , Vitellogenins/genetics , HeLa Cells , Proteomics , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics
14.
Microorganisms ; 11(1)2023 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36677417

ABSTRACT

The cattle-adapted serovar Salmonella Dublin (S. Dublin) causes enteritis and systemic diseases in animals. In the German federal state Schleswig-Holstein, S. Dublin is the most important serovar in cattle indicating an endemic character of the infection. To gain information on dissemination and routes of infection, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to explore the genetic traits of 78 S. Dublin strains collected over a period of six years. The phylogeny was analysed using core-genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (cgSNPs). Genomic clusters at 100, 15 and 1 cgSNPs were selected for molecular analysis. Important specific virulence determinants were detected in all strains but multidrug resistance in S. Dublin organisms was not found. Using 15 cgSNPs epidemiological links between herds were identified, clusters at 1 cgSNPs provided clear evidence on both persistence of S. Dublin at single farms in consecutive years and transmission of the organisms between herds in different distances. A possible risk factor for the repeated occurrence of S. Dublin in certain districts of Schleswig-Holstein might be the spreading of manure on pastures and grassland. Effective control of S. Dublin requires farm-specific analysis of the management supplemented by WGS of outbreak causing S. Dublin strains to clearly identify routes of infection.

15.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(1)2023 Dec 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38247581

ABSTRACT

For this study, antimicrobial susceptibility data for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin)-a well-known cattle-adapted pathogen with current concerns for multidrug resistance-were recovered from cattle at the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory System (CAHFS) over the last three decades (1993-2019) and were evaluated using tools to capture diversity in antimicrobial resistance. For this purpose, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) testing was conducted for 247 clinical S. Dublin isolates. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles revealed a predominant core multidrug-resistant pattern in the three most common AMR profiles observed. Antimicrobial resistance richness, diversity, and similarity analysis revealed patterns for changes in AMR profiles for different age groups. Discriminant analysis using MIC log2-transformed data revealed changes in MIC for year groups, with a time-sequence pattern observed. Drivers for reduced susceptibility were observed for 3rd generation cephalosporins and quinolones observed for more recent year groups (2011-2015 and 2016-2019) when compared to older year groups (1993-1999 and 2000-2005). Together, these results highlight the changes in the diversity of AMR profiles, as well as changes in susceptibility of S. Dublin over time for critical antimicrobials of importance to both animals and humans, and support the need for continued monitoring and efforts that will support judicious use of antimicrobials, especially for these two drug classes.

16.
Data Brief ; 45: 108721, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36426054

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin) is a zoonotic pathogen causing infections in animals, especially in cattle. In this study, we report draft genome sequences of four S. Dublin isolated between 1956 and 1957 from cattle and fox in Poland. Whole genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina platform and the data is available at National Center for Biotechnology Information under the BioProject accession number PRJNA865912. In order to better understand the genetic basis of epidemiology of S. Dublin infection, the obtained sequences were analyzed using the tools which are available at Center of Genomic Epidemiology (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/) including core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) and core genome single nucleotide polymorphisms (cgSNPs).

17.
Prev Vet Med ; 208: 105776, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36265299

ABSTRACT

Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Dublin has been the most common Salmonella serovar isolated from cattle in Great Britain for the previous 22 years. It can cause a wide variety of clinical presentations and result in significant welfare and productivity concerns in infected herds. Bulk tank antibody testing undertaken every three or four months forms the basis of eradication and monitoring programmes in Denmark and the Netherlands and has been shown to be a sensitive, specific and cost-effective way of establishing seroprevalence and monitoring infection at a herd level. A prevalence estimate based on quarterly bulk tank testing has not been previously carried out in Great Britain. This study recruited 410 herds across Great Britain, who submitted milk samples on a quarterly basis for screening by an ELISA for Salmonella Dublin antibody. Classifying herds according to the Danish eradication scheme classification gave an apparent prevalence of 38% (95% confidence intervals 34-43%) and an estimated true prevalence of 40% (95% confidence intervals 35-45%), taking into account the test sensitivity and specificity. Of the 401 herds which completed the quarterly bulk tank testing, 45% had one or more positive bulk tank results.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Salmonella Infections, Animal , Cattle , Animals , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Milk/chemistry , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Prevalence , Seroepidemiologic Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Salmonella , Antibodies, Bacterial/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods
18.
Prev Vet Med ; 206: 105699, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35780658

ABSTRACT

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) test is commonly used for detection of antibodies to Salmonella Dublin in individual bovine milk samples. However, little is known about its accuracy when used on bulk tank milk for determining herd-level S. Dublin status and when evaluated without assuming a perfect reference test. The objectives of this study were: i) to estimate the herd prevalence of S. Dublin among dairy cattle herds in Québec, Canada; ii) to estimate the herd sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available ELISA test when used on bulk milk; iii) to examine how the diagnostic test accuracy varies with different bulk milk ELISA cut-offs; and (iv) to assess the added value of combining ELISA screening of bulk milk and individual serum of 10 animals for determining S. Dublin herd status. A cohort of 302 dairy herds selected in three regions (population 1) and 58 herds that have already tested positive to S. Dublin (population 2) were recruited. A total of 715 bulk milk samples and 7150 individual blood samples from cattle over 3 months old (10 animals per herd) sampled on two occasions were collected. Testing was conducted using PrioCHECK™ Salmonella Ab bovine Dublin ELISA test for milk (Bmilk ELISA: test under investigation) and for serum of 10 individual animals (Serum10 ELISA: imperfect reference test) to determine the herd-level S. Dublin status. A latent class model for two populations, two tests, allowing for conditional dependence between tests was fit within a Bayesian framework. At cut-off PP % ≥ 15 for a Bmilk ELISA, which is used by provincial authorities, the herd prevalence of S. Dublin estimated using informative prior was 6.8 % (4.3-9.9) in population 1. The herd sensitivity and specificity estimates (95 % Bayesian Credibility Intervals) for Bmilk ELISA were 40.6 % (15.6-88.8) and 91.9 % (88.3-95.8), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values of Bmilk ELISA applied in population 1 were 26.4 % (8.5-60.2) and 95.8 % (92.1-99.2), respectively. Increasing Bmilk ELISA cut-offs had little influence on predictive values. The combination of both ELISA tests did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of S. Dublin. Our study shows that a test-positive herd based on a single bulk milk sample would require complementary tests for status confirmation. However, a test-negative herd could be classified as true negative with a high certainty.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases , Milk , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/analysis , Bayes Theorem , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Humans , Latent Class Analysis , Milk/chemistry , Salmonella
19.
Microorganisms ; 10(5)2022 Apr 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35630330

ABSTRACT

Worldwide, Salmonella Dublin (S. Dublin) is responsible for clinical disease in cattle and also in humans. In Southern Bavaria, Germany, the serovar was identified as a causative agent for 54 animal disease outbreaks in herds between 2017 and 2021. Most of these emerged from cattle herds (n = 50). Two occurred in pig farms and two in bovine herds other than cattle. Genomic analysis of 88 S. Dublin strains isolated during these animal disease outbreaks revealed 7 clusters with 3 different MLST-based sequence types and 16 subordinate cgMLST-based complex types. Antimicrobial susceptibility investigation revealed one resistant and three intermediate strains. Furthermore, only a few genes coding for bacterial virulence were found among the isolates. Genome analysis enables pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility, serotyping, phylogeny, and follow-up traceback analysis. Mountain pastures turned out to be the most likely locations for transmission between cattle of different herd origins, as indicated by epidemiological data and genomic traceback analyses. In this context, S. Dublin shedding was also detected in asymptomatic herding dogs. Due to the high prevalence of S. Dublin in Upper Bavaria over the years, we suggest referring to this administrative region as "endemic". Consequently, cattle should be screened for salmonellosis before and after mountain pasturing.

20.
Front Microbiol ; 13: 828013, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35633687

ABSTRACT

Diarrhea is a major health problem in neonatal and young calves worldwide. It can be caused by a variety of infectious agents, including the bacteria Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin), enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), and Clostridium perfringens. Preventive alternatives to antibiotic treatment should be identified. As a first step toward this, the aim of the current study was to examine whether cell-free supernatants from cow milk fermented by lactic acid bacteria affects virulence-gene expression in strains of S. Dublin, ETEC E. coli F5 and C. perfringens. pH-neutralized, cell-free, spent medium of milk (nCFSM) fermented by 61 different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and non-LAB starter cultures belonging to 17 genera was assayed for their effect on expression of important virulence factors (S. Dublin hilA, ssrB, ssaG, flhD, prgI, fliC; ETEC E. coli F5 fanC, estA, fim41a; C. perfringens cpa), when the bacteria were grown in the nCFSM. Screening was done using either a promoter-reporter expression system or RT-qPCR. nCFSM from Bifidobacterium longum BL-15955 and Limosilactobacillus reuteri LR-33016 downregulated the expression of fanC, fim41a and estA genes in the four tested ETEC E. coli F5 strains without affecting their growth, while mainly B. longum BL-15955 downregulated expression of cpa in the four tested strains of C. perfringens. nCFSM from the mixed cultures; NU-TRISH® BY-Mild (Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus and Bifidobacterium BL-15954) and COMBO4 (Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus), as well as Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32 downregulated the tested virulence genes in the three tested strains of S. Dublin. To enable possible downregulation of the expression of virulence genes in all three target bacteria simultaneously, nCFSM was prepared from NU-TRISH® By-Mild in combination with B. longum BL-15955 (i.e. a four-strain combination). The nCFSM from this combination downregulated the virulence genes expression in all the three species. In the future, NU-TRISH® By-Mild and B. longum BL-15955 in combination could potentially be used for prevention of neonatal calf diarrhea caused by S. Dublin, E. coli F5, and C. perfringens, reducing the need for antimicrobial treatment, however, field studies are needed to prove that.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...