Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 480
Filter
1.
Rev. enferm. UERJ ; 32: e80274, jan. -dez. 2024.
Article in English, Spanish, Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1554400

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: avaliar os fatores clínicos associados ao bem-estar das mulheres durante o trabalho de parto e parto à luz da bioética principialista e da deontologia. Método: estudo transversal com abordagem quantitativa. Participaram 396 puérperas internadas em um hospital municipal do sudoeste da Bahia, e os dados foram coletados no período de janeiro a maio de 2023, após aprovação do comitê de ética em pesquisa. Os dados foram organizados no software Excel e analisados via SPSS v.25. a partir da regressão logística multinomial. Resultados: a maior parte da amostra apresentou bem-estar com assistência em saúde, mulheres que tiveram parto realizado por profissionais não médicos apresentaram mais chances de níveis de bem-estar "adequado". E mulheres que não tiveram a via de parto cesárea apresentaram aumento de chances de bem-estar. Conclusão: é necessário que os profissionais reflitam sobre suas ações, condicionando-as à humanização no parto, em observância aos princípios bioéticos.


Objective: to evaluate the clinical factors associated with women's well-being during labor and delivery in the light of bioethics principlism and deontology. Method: a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach was conducted. It involved 396 postpartum women admitted to a municipal hospital in the southwest of Bahia. Data were collected from January to May 2023, after approval from the research ethics committee. The data were tabulated using Excel software and analyzed using SPSS v.25 through Multinomial Logistic Regression. Results: majority of the sample exhibited well-being with health care assistance. Women who underwent delivery performed by non-medical professionals showed higher chances of "adequate" levels of well-being. Additionally, women who did not undergo cesarean delivery showed increased chances of well-being. Conclusion: It is necessary for professionals to reflect on their actions, conditioning them to the humanization of childbirth, according to bioethical principles.


Objetivo: evaluar los factores clínicos asociados al bienestar de la mujer durante el trabajo de parto y parto a la luz de la bioética y la deontología principialista. Método: estudio transversal con enfoque cuantitativo. Incluyó 396 puérperas ingresadas en un hospital municipal del suroeste de Bahía. Recolección de datos de enero a mayo de 2023, con aprobación del comité de ética en investigación. Los datos se tabularon en el software Excel y se analizaron mediante SPSS v.25. utilizando regresión logística multinomial. Resultados: la mayoría de las participantes de la muestra presentó bienestar con la atención para la salud; las que tuvieron partos realizados por profesionales no médicos tenían más probabilidades de tener niveles "adecuados" de bienestar; las que no tuvieron parto por cesárea tenían mayores probabilidades de tener bienestar. Conclusión: es necesario que los profesionales reflexionen sobre sus acciones y las adecuen para humanizar el parto, respetando los principios bioéticos.

2.
Referência ; serVI(3): e32647, dez. 2024. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1558852

ABSTRACT

Resumo Enquadramento: Em tempo de pandemia, as consultas de enfermagem de vigilância da gravidez sofreram alterações, nomeadamente na restrição de acompanhantes. Por esse motivo, é importante a avaliação da satisfação das grávidas com a assistência de enfermagem durante este contexto pandémico. Objetivo: Avaliar a satisfação da grávida com a assistência das enfermeiras obstétricas nas consultas de vigilância da gravidez durante o contexto de pandemia COVID-19. Metodologia: Estudo transversal descritivo de natureza quantitativa, com uma amostra de 196 grávidas. Aplicado a Escala de Satisfação dos Pacientes com a Assistência de Enfermagem (General Practice Nurse Satisfaction Scale - GPNS), constituída pelas dimensões: relacionamento interpessoal e comunicação, confiança, credibilidade e dedicação. Resultados: As grávidas apresentam-se em média mais satisfeitas na dimensão relacionamento interpessoal e comunicação e menos satisfeitas na dimensão dedicação. Conclusão: As grávidas apresentam-se satisfeitas com a assistência de enfermagem percecionando a sua importância. Tal reforça a pertinência das consultas serem realizadas por um Enfermeiro Especialista em Enfermagem de Saúde Materna e Obstétrica.


Abstract Background: Prenatal nursing appointments underwent changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, namely in the restriction of companions. For this reason, it is important to assess pregnant women's satisfaction with nursing care during this period. Objective: To assess pregnant women's satisfaction with nurse midwife-led prenatal appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology: A qualitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 196 pregnant women. The Portuguese version of the General Practice Nurse Satisfaction Scale (Escala de Satisfação dos Pacientes com a Assistência de Enfermagem) was administered to the sample. The tool consists of the following dimensions: interpersonal relationship and communication, confidence, credibility, and dedication. Results: Pregnant women are, on average, more satisfied in the interpersonal relationship and communication dimension and less satisfied in the dedication dimension. Conclusion: Pregnant women are satisfied with nursing care and acknowledge its importance. This finding reinforces the importance of nurse midwife-led consultations.


Resumen Marco contextual: En tiempos de pandemia, las citas de enfermería para el seguimiento del embarazo cambiaron, sobre todo la restricción de acompañantes. Por esta razón, es importante evaluar la satisfacción de las mujeres embarazadas con los cuidados de enfermería durante este contexto pandémico. Objetivo: Evaluar la satisfacción de las mujeres embarazadas con la atención prestada por las enfermeras obstétricas en las consultas de seguimiento del embarazo durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo transversal de carácter cuantitativo, con una muestra de 196 mujeres embarazadas. Se aplicó la Escala de Satisfacción de los Pacientes con Asistencia de Enfermería (General Practice Nurse Satisfaction Scale - GPNS), compuesta por las siguientes dimensiones: relaciones interpersonales y comunicación, confianza, credibilidad y dedicación. Resultados: Las mujeres embarazadas están, de media, más satisfechas en la dimensión relaciones interpersonales y comunicación, y menos satisfechas en la dimensión dedicación. Conclusión: Las embarazadas se mostraron satisfechas con los cuidados de enfermería y se dieron cuenta de su importancia. Esto refuerza la pertinencia de que las consultas sean realizadas por una enfermera especializada en Enfermería de Salud Materna y Obstétrica.

3.
Vive (El Alto) ; 7(19): 164-173, abr. 2024.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1560627

ABSTRACT

La satisfacción de las madres de recién nacidos con los cuidados de enfermería es crucial, dado el impacto emocional que supone la llegada de un nuevo bebé. Durante los primeros días tras el parto, es fundamental establecer un fuerte vínculo madre-recién nacido, así como garantizar un cuidado efectivo del bebé para que las madres se sientan seguras y confiadas en la atención hospitalaria. Además, las enfermeras desempeñan un papel esencial en el apoyo a la lactancia materna, con beneficios significativos para la salud del bebé. Objetivo. Determinar el nivel de satisfacción de las madres de recién nacidos con los cuidados de enfermería en el servicio de atención inmediata del recién nacido - alojamiento conjunto del Hospital de Pampas de Huancavelica. Materiales y métodos. La metodología empleada fue no experimental, de tipo descriptivo, transversal y prospectivo. Se encuestó a 262 madres de recién nacidos durante los meses de marzo a julio de 2023, utilizando un cuestionario estructurado con 24 ítems como instrumento de medición. Resultados. Se indica que el 65.3% de las madres encuestadas expresaron un nivel de satisfacción completa, el 25.2% mostró un nivel de satisfacción intermedia, y el 9.5% manifestó insatisfacción. Conclusiones. Aunque la mayoría de las madres encuestadas están satisfechas o muy satisfechas con los cuidados de enfermería recibidos, aún existe un porcentaje considerable de insatisfacción. Esto sugiere la necesidad de mejorar ciertos aspectos para garantizar una atención óptima a los recién nacidos y sus madres.


New mothers' satisfaction with nursing care is crucial, given the emotional impact of the arrival of a new baby. During the first days after delivery, establishing a strong mother-newborn bond is critical, as is ensuring effective infant care so that mothers feel secure and confident in hospital care. In addition, nurses play an essential role in supporting breastfeeding, with significant benefits for the baby's health. Objective. To determine the level of satisfaction of mothers of newborns with nursing care in the immediate newborn care service - joint accommodation of the Hospital de Pampas de Huancavelica. Materials and methods. The methodology used was non-experimental, descriptive, cross-sectional and prospective. A total of 262 mothers of newborns were surveyed during the months of March to July 2023, using a structured questionnaire with 24 items as a measurement instrument. Results. It is indicated that 65.3% of the mothers surveyed expressed a level of complete satisfaction, 25.2% showed an intermediate level of satisfaction, and 9.5% expressed dissatisfaction. Conclusions. Although most of the mothers surveyed are satisfied or very satisfied with the nursing care received, there is still a considerable percentage of dissatisfaction. This suggests the need to improve certain aspects to guarantee optimal care for newborns and their mothers.


A satisfação das novas mães com os cuidados de enfermagem é crucial, dado o impacto emocional da chegada de um novo bebê. Durante os primeiros dias após o nascimento, estabelecer um forte vínculo entre a mãe e o recém-nascido e garantir o cuidado eficaz do bebê é essencial para que as mães se sintam seguras e confiantes no atendimento hospitalar. Além disso, os enfermeiros desempenham um papel essencial no apoio ao aleitamento materno, com benefícios significativos para a saúde do bebê. Objetivo. Determinar o nível de satisfação das mães de recém-nascidos com o atendimento de enfermagem no serviço de atendimento imediato ao recém-nascido - alojamento conjunto do Hospital Pampas de Huancavelica. Materiais e métodos. A metodologia utilizada foi não experimental, descritiva, transversal e prospectiva. Um total de 262 mães de recém-nascidos foi pesquisado durante os meses de março a julho de 2023, usando um questionário estruturado com 24 itens como instrumento de medição. Resultados. Indicou-se que 65,3% das mães pesquisadas expressaram um nível de satisfação completa, 25,2% mostraram um nível intermediário de satisfação e 9,5% expressaram insatisfação. Conclusões. Embora a maioria das mães pesquisadas esteja satisfeita ou muito satisfeita com a assistência de enfermagem recebida, ainda há uma porcentagem considerável de insatisfação. Isso sugere a necessidade de melhorar certos aspectos para garantir o cuidado ideal para os recém-nascidos e suas mães.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female
4.
Farm. hosp ; 48(2): 64-69, Mar-Abr. 2024. ilus
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-231610

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: analizar la evolución del proyecto «Mapa Estratégico de Atención Farmacéutica al Paciente Externo» (MAPEX) por comunidades autónomas en España, a través del análisis de los resultados de la encuesta de situación comparativa entre los años 2016 y 2021. Métodos: un comité de expertos nacionales pertenecientes a la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria elaboró la Encuesta MAPEX sobre la situación de las unidades de pacientes externos, que constó de 43 preguntas específicas de aspectos relacionados con estructura, contexto, integración, procesos, resultados y formación, docencia e investigación. Se llevó a cabo en 2 periodos, uno en 2016 y otro en 2021 (con 3 preguntas adicionales en 2021, relacionadas con los avances de la iniciativa MAPEX y las líneas prioritarias a seguir). Se realizó un análisis comparativo de resultados a nivel nacional y por comunidad autónoma. Resultados: participaron 141 hospitales en 2016 y 138 en 2021, con representación de las 17 comunidades autónomas. El análisis de los resultados mostró mejoras significativas en todas las dimensiones de la encuesta, con variabilidad entre las diferentes regiones. De entre las mejoras más importantes, destacó el desarrollo y consolidación de la telefarmacia, la mayor especialización del farmacéutico por áreas de conocimiento y su integración en equipos multidisciplinares. La mejora del modelo asistencial se consideró el mayor avance a nivel general (65%) y la atención farmacéutica no presencial a nivel de centro (48,2%). Se consideraron líneas prioritarias de trabajo la expansión y aplicación práctica de la metodología de atención farmacéutica (66,4%), la investigación (58,4%) y la formación en todas las iniciativas MAPEX (53,3%). Conclusiones: la implantación y desarrollo de las iniciativas MAPEX ha supuesto un impacto positivo en la evolución en todos los ámbitos asistenciales de la atención farmacéutica al paciente externo. La encuesta permite identificar...(AU)


Objective: Analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between the years 2016 and 2021. Methods: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching and investigation. It was carried out in two periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. Results: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialization of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). Conclusions: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Quality of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Health Systems , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pharmacy
5.
Farm. hosp ; 48(2): T64-T69, Mar-Abr. 2024. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-231611

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: analizar la evolución del proyecto «Mapa Estratégico de Atención Farmacéutica al Paciente Externo» (MAPEX) por comunidades autónomas en España, a través del análisis de los resultados de la encuesta de situación comparativa entre los años 2016 y 2021. Métodos: un comité de expertos nacionales pertenecientes a la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria elaboró la Encuesta MAPEX sobre la situación de las unidades de pacientes externos, que constó de 43 preguntas específicas de aspectos relacionados con estructura, contexto, integración, procesos, resultados y formación, docencia e investigación. Se llevó a cabo en 2 periodos, uno en 2016 y otro en 2021 (con 3 preguntas adicionales en 2021, relacionadas con los avances de la iniciativa MAPEX y las líneas prioritarias a seguir). Se realizó un análisis comparativo de resultados a nivel nacional y por comunidad autónoma. Resultados: participaron 141 hospitales en 2016 y 138 en 2021, con representación de las 17 comunidades autónomas. El análisis de los resultados mostró mejoras significativas en todas las dimensiones de la encuesta, con variabilidad entre las diferentes regiones. De entre las mejoras más importantes, destacó el desarrollo y consolidación de la telefarmacia, la mayor especialización del farmacéutico por áreas de conocimiento y su integración en equipos multidisciplinares. La mejora del modelo asistencial se consideró el mayor avance a nivel general (65%) y la atención farmacéutica no presencial a nivel de centro (48,2%). Se consideraron líneas prioritarias de trabajo la expansión y aplicación práctica de la metodología de atención farmacéutica (66,4%), la investigación (58,4%) y la formación en todas las iniciativas MAPEX (53,3%). Conclusiones: la implantación y desarrollo de las iniciativas MAPEX ha supuesto un impacto positivo en la evolución en todos los ámbitos asistenciales de la atención farmacéutica al paciente externo. La encuesta permite identificar...(AU)


Objective: Analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between the years 2016 and 2021. Methods: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching and investigation. It was carried out in two periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. Results: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialization of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). Conclusions: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement...(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pharmaceutical Services , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Quality of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Health Systems , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pharmacy
6.
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed) ; 34(2): 82-89, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38484934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the degree of satisfaction of women treated with dermopigmentation and reconstruction of the Areola-Nipple Complex (ANC) after breast reconstruction, as well as their demographic profile and clinical-evolutionary characteristics. METHODS: Descriptive observational study including 128 women treated with dermopigmentation after oncologic breast reconstruction during 2018. In 2021 they were administered an adapted satisfaction questionnaire, which contains 27 items and categorizes satisfaction from 1-5, in addition other clinical-evolutionary and demographic variables were collected. RESULTS: Mean age was 51 (±9) years, 89.1% had previously undergone PDA reconstruction. Mean satisfaction with dermopigmentation was 4.4 (±0.88) and 3.79 (±1.06) for PDA reconstruction. Complications were rare, but 54.5% (n = 54) of the patients reported that the CAP reconstruction did not offer the expected projection, 91.6% (n = 98) that the color had faded and 51.4% (n = 55) would choose permanent tattooing. It was perceived that, the higher the satisfaction of the CAP, the higher the satisfaction of dermopigmentation, while the older the age and previous chemotherapy treatment the lower the color durability (p value ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent reconstructive breast surgery show a high degree of satisfaction with dermopigmentation and surgical reconstruction of the PDA, but reiterate the low projecticity of the dermopigmentation and the surgical reconstruction of the PDA, but reiterate the low degree of satisfaction with the dermopigmentation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Nipples , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Mammaplasty/methods , Nipples/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Tattooing , Aged , Skin Pigmentation
7.
Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed) ; 35(3): 201-212, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction in relation with nursing care has become a key determinant of the quality of hospital care. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient satisfaction in relation with nursing care in a critical care context; to determine the correlation between critical patient satisfaction and sociodemographic and clinical variables and to describe patient perceptions with nursing care. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, correlational study which includes the analysis of some open questions in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary level university hospital. The degree of satisfaction of all patients discharged from de ICU was evaluated. It was used the validated Spanish version of Nursing Intensive-Care Satisfaction-Scale (NICSS). There were also collected sociodemographic and clinical data and 3 open questions were asked. It was used the inferential and descriptive statistics considering statistically significant p<.05. Open questions were examined using a language context analysis. The approval of the hospital ethical committee was obtained. RESULTS: 111 patients agreed to participate, with a mean age of 64.18 years (CI 95% 61.36-66.88) and with a medium level of satisfaction of 5.83 (CI 95% 5.78-5.88) being 6 the maximum score. Women, older patients and those who reflect a higher degree of recovery, are those who reported greater satisfaction. Three main themes emerged from the analysis of the open-ended questions of the surveys: nurse patient relationship, professional practice environment and ICU nature. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction in relation with nursing care was elevated. Age, sex and degree of recovery significantly influenced their perception. Nurse patient relationship and the professional practice environment were aspects highlighted by patients. The professional model incorporated by the institution may encouraged these results.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Critical Care Nursing , Self Report
8.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(5): T458-T465, 2024 May.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient esthetic satisfaction following facial fillers is an essential topic that should be studied as the number of individuals seeking treatment increases. The face is an essential component of the human body that is frequently associated with beauty, youthfulness, and health. Individuals may seek facial augmentation with fillers for a variety of reasons, such as congenital, acquired by means of aging or disease, or current aesthetic trends. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to assess patient's aesthetic satisfaction and description of common clinical complications in relation to the facial filler injections. METHOD: A cross sectional survey using a questionnaire derived from the global aesthetic improvement scale and WHO quality of life scale, convenience sampling was used to recruit patients attending cosmetic clinics, descriptive analysis and Chi-square methods were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the study, 500 female participants, with an average age of 28.48 years, were included. Over 90% reported improvement after filler treatment, ranging from improved to very much improved. A statistically significant correlation was observed between patient satisfaction and the number of filler treatments and the anatomical injection site. However, no statistically significant correlation was found when considering age groups. Local side effects, such as swelling and redness at the injection site, were common but generally mild and of short duration. CONCLUSION: Although the satisfaction level is currently high, practitioners in the field need to pay more attention to this important outcome, since understanding the patient's motivation and expectation before proceeding with the procedure is very important and can contribute significantly in determining patient satisfaction with the result.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Esthetics , Adolescent , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Injection Site Reaction/etiology , Injection Site Reaction/epidemiology
9.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 47(1): 1-13, ene. 2024. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-229081

ABSTRACT

Introduction The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on Patient experience (CSSQP) was recently developed and validated within a Bowel Cancer Screening Program. We aimed to identify factor related to patient experience through the CSSQP, including all indications for colonoscopy. Indicators of satisfaction and perceived safety with colonoscopy were also assessed to compare the different centers. Methods Multicenter study in nine Spanish hospitals. Consecutive patients who had undergone a colonoscopy completed the CSSQP adding a novel item on bowel preparation. Factors related to patient experiences and data from non-respondents were analyzed. Results Of 2200 patients, 1753 filled out the questionnaire (response rate 79.7%, sample error 2%). Patients whose colonoscopy indication was a primary colorectal cancer screening (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.15–2.44, p=0.007) or due to a +FIT (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.18–2.53) reported higher satisfaction than patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, college-educated patients (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.25–3.56) were more likely to report better overall satisfaction than patients with lower education level. Significant differences were observed in the majority of the CSSQP items between centers. Safety incidents were reported by 35 (2%) patients, and 176 (10%) patients reported that they received insufficient information. Conclusion The CSSQP identifies several significant factors on satisfaction and perceived safety in patients referred for colonoscopy for any reason. The CSSQP also allows comparison of patient-identified colonoscopy quality indicators between centers (AU)


Introducción El Cuestionario de Satisfacción y Seguridad de la Colonoscopia basado en la experiencia del Paciente (CSSQP) ha sido desarrollado y validado recientemente en pacientes del Programa de cribado de cáncer colorrectal (CCR). El objetivo del estudio fue identificar los factores relacionados con la experiencia de los pacientes a través del CSSQP, incluyendo todas las indicaciones de la colonoscopia. Además, se evaluaron los factores relacionados con la satisfacción y la seguridad del paciente con el fin de comparar diferentes departamentos. Métodos Estudio multicéntrico de nueve hospitales españoles en el que se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos que completaron el CSSQP incorporando un nuevo ítem sobre la preparación intestinal. Se analizaron los factores relacionados con la experiencia de los pacientes y los datos de los no respondedores. Resultados De 2.200 pacientes, 1.753 completaron el cuestionario (tasa de respuesta del 79,7%, error muestral del 2%). Los pacientes en los que la indicación era por cribado de CCR (OR: 1,68; IC 95%: 1,15-2,44; p=0,007) o por FIT positivo (OR: 1,73; IC 95%: 1,18-2,53) informaron mayor satisfacción que en aquellos que se solicitó la colonoscopia por síntomas gastrointestinales. Además, los pacientes con estudios universitarios (OR: 2,11; IC 95%: 1,25-3,56) informaron mayor satisfacción que aquellos con menor nivel de estudios. Se observaron diferencias significativas en la mayoría de los ítems del CSSQP entre los centros participantes. Treinta y cinco (2%) pacientes reportaron incidentes de seguridad y 176 (10%) reconocieron haber recibido información insuficiente. Conclusiones El CSSQP identifica los factores determinantes que influyen en la satisfacción y la seguridad de los pacientes a los que se les realiza colonoscopia por cualquier indicación. Además, permite comparar los indicadores de calidad de la colonoscopia desde la perspectiva del paciente entre los distintos centros (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Colonoscopy , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Safety , Surveys and Questionnaires , Prospective Studies
10.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 47(1): 1-13, 2024 Jan.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36841528

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on Patient experience (CSSQP) was recently developed and validated within a Bowel Cancer Screening Program. We aimed to identify factor related to patient experience through the CSSQP, including all indications for colonoscopy. Indicators of satisfaction and perceived safety with colonoscopy were also assessed to compare the different centers. METHODS: Multicenter study in nine Spanish hospitals. Consecutive patients who had undergone a colonoscopy completed the CSSQP adding a novel item on bowel preparation. Factors related to patient experiences and data from non-respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 2200 patients, 1753 filled out the questionnaire (response rate 79.7%, sample error 2%). Patients whose colonoscopy indication was a primary colorectal cancer screening (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.15-2.44, p=0.007) or due to a +FIT (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.18-2.53) reported higher satisfaction than patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. In addition, college-educated patients (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.25-3.56) were more likely to report better overall satisfaction than patients with lower education level. Significant differences were observed in the majority of the CSSQP items between centers. Safety incidents were reported by 35 (2%) patients, and 176 (10%) patients reported that they received insufficient information. CONCLUSION: The CSSQP identifies several significant factors on satisfaction and perceived safety in patients referred for colonoscopy for any reason. The CSSQP also allows comparison of patient-identified colonoscopy quality indicators between centers.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Patient Outcome Assessment
11.
J Healthc Qual Res ; 39(1): 13-22, 2024.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37919175

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide subjective information about their disease, treatment, and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new system of work coordinated between pharmacists and dermatologists, based on the collection and analysis of PROs to assess its clinical impact as well as patients satisfaction. METHOD: A prospective single-centre observational study was conducted under clinical conditions and included adult patients diagnosed with psoriasis (PS) and atopic dermatitis (AD) between April-2021 and February-2022. Pharmacists and dermatologists agreed on this systematic work. A REDCap® database was designed to facilitate data collection and the subsequent analysis. RESULTS: A total of 288 and 41 patients with PS and AD, respectively, were included. Those who started treatment showed significant improvement with a decrease in PROs and clinical parameters (p < 0.001). The pharmacist made 168 and 7 recommendations to dermatologists for PS and AD patients, respectively, of which 66.07% and 57.1% were accepted. The most common recommendations were «consult with rheumatologist¼ (20.83%), «extend drug regimen¼ (19.64%) and «consider change in treatment¼ (11.90%). Adverse events were reported in 55 and 17 patients with PS and AD, respectively. Of 103 patients, 75% were «very satisfied¼ and 20% «satisfied¼ with the system. CONCLUSIONS: This new working system helps to evaluate the short and long-term effectiveness of treatments and also to identify adverse events, alarm symptoms and co-morbidities in order to optimize therapies. Collaboration between pharmacists and dermatologists reduces decision-making time and patients appreciate better clinical care leading to higher patient satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatology , Pharmacy , Psoriasis , Adult , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Psoriasis/drug therapy
12.
Farm Hosp ; 48(2): 64-69, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749003

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between the years 2016 and 2021. METHODS: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching and investigation. It was carried out in two periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. RESULTS: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialization of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement, as well as those areas to be developed through strengthening and corrective actions. The expansion of the project in the coming years will mean progress towards excellence in care and in the improvement of health results.


Subject(s)
Outpatients , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Humans , Spain , Ambulatory Care , Delivery of Health Care
13.
Farm Hosp ; 48(2): T64-T69, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151407

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between 2016 and 2021. METHODS: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching, and investigation. It was carried out in 2 periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. RESULTS: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialisation of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement, as well as those areas to be developed through strengthening and corrective actions. The expansion of the project in the coming years will mean progress toward excellence in care and in the improvement of health results.


Subject(s)
Outpatients , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Humans , Spain , Ambulatory Care , Delivery of Health Care
14.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1551000

ABSTRACT

Los implantes dentales se han convertido en un componente rutinario de la práctica dental diaria. A la vez, pueden producir molestias, destrucción desenfrenada de la salud bucal o reemplazo quirúrgico y costoso de un implante fallido. La detección temprana de la pérdida ósea marginal es vital para la planificación del tratamiento y el pronóstico de los implantes. Estos están diseñados para adaptarse mejor a los diversos tipos de hueso y fallan debido a muchas razones. Entender los desafíos y las expectativas del paciente a través de la honestidad, es una parte importante del tratamiento, cuyo éxito no solo dependerá de los integrantes del equipo implantológico o de técnica, sino también del cuidado del paciente al realizar su higiene diaria. Por esa razón, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos MEDLINE y PubMed sobre molestias periimplantar, consultándose 30 referencias de los últimos cinco años.


Dental implants have become a routine component of daily dental practice. At the same time, they can cause discomfort, rampant destruction of oral health, or expensive surgical replacement of a failed implant. Early detection of marginal bone loss is vital for treatment planning and implant prognosis. These are designed to best fit various bone types and fail due to many reasons. Understanding the patient's challenges and expectations through honesty is an important part of the treatment, whose success will not only depend on the members of the implantology or technical team, but also on the patient's care when performing their daily hygiene. For this reason, a bibliographic search was carried out in the MEDLINE and PubMed databases on peri-implant discomfort, consulting 30 bibliographical references from the last 5 years.

15.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BNUY | ID: biblio-1556975

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la patología de baja complejidad representa un número muy importante dentro de las cirugías que se realizan en pediatría. Los niños, en su mayoría, no presentan patologías previas que requieran cuidados especiales. Las listas de espera para resolución de pacientes de baja complejidad aumentan, en general, en meses donde el hospital se ve sobrecargado de ingresos, esto a su vez se ha visto incrementado en los últimos dos años, vinculado a la pandemia por COVID-19. Surgió, entonces, la necesidad de implementar un programa donde la patología de baja complejidad, en pacientes que cumplan ciertos criterios, pueda resolverse mediante la modalidad de cirugía ambulatoria. Esto implica un beneficio tanto para el niño y la familia, con reducción de los niveles de estrés vinculados a la permanencia en el hospital, menor probabilidad de adquirir infecciones intrahospitalarias, limitación en el impacto socioeconómico a nivel familiar, como claros beneficios para el hospital, ya que reduce el ingreso con reducción de costos y sin necesidad de utilizar camas de internación. Objetivo: analizar los resultados iniciales del programa de cirugía ambulatoria del Hospital Pediátrico del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell (HP-CHPR) en base a la satisfacción de la familia. Material y método: se recabaron los datos de pacientes asistidos bajo el sistema de cirugía ambulatoria desde junio de 2021 hasta enero de 2022. Aplicamos un cuestionario breve para evaluar la satisfacción del programa con vistas a evaluar resultados iniciales, y, de requerirlo, realizar cambios en pos de su mejora. Resultados: ingresaron al programa 35 pacientes en el Departamento de Cirugía General; pudimos realizar la encuesta de satisfacción a las personas responsables de 25 pacientes. El 100% de los encuestados considera que es beneficioso acompañar a su hijo a la sala de operaciones. Detallamos la respuesta a cada punto del cuestionario realizado. En el último apartado, donde preguntamos qué cambios realizaría, en cuatro casos las respuestas fueron "tomar en cuenta más la opinión del niño", "mejorar la información preoperatoria" y "mejorar la comunicación con respecto a los cuidados posoperatorios" y "mejorar los tiempos de ingreso a block". Conclusiones: la satisfacción de los cuidadores de los niños asistidos en su mayoría es buena. Detectamos aspectos a mejorar basados en ajustar tiempos de ingreso a la sala de operaciones, así como en la comunicación con el cuidador y el niño en lo que respecta a los cuidados posoperatorios en domicilio.


Summary: Introduction: low complexity pathologies account for a very high number of the surgeries performed in pediatrics. Most of the children do not present previous pathologies that require special care. The waiting lists for the resolution of low complexity surgeries generally increases during the months when the hospital is overloaded with admissions, a trend that has grown in the last 2 years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The need arose to implement a program where low-complexity pathology in patients who meet certain criteria can be resolved through out-patient surgery. This implies a benefit for both the child and the family, reduced stress linked to hospital stay, a lower probability of acquiring nosocomial infections, limitation of the socioeconomic impact at the family level, as well as clear benefits for the hospital, such as reduction of admission costs and hospital beds. Objective: to analyze the initial results of the Out-Patient Surgery Program of the CHPR Pediatric Hospital based on family satisfaction. Material and Methods: the data of patients assisted under the Ambulatory Surgery system were collected from June 2021 to January 2022. We applied a brief questionnaire to assess initial satisfaction levels regarding the program and eventual changes required to improve the program. Results: 35 patients joined the program in the Department of General Surgery and the satisfaction survey was completed by 25 patients. 100% of the respondents consider that it is beneficial to accompany their children into the surgical room. We describe the responses provided to all the questions administered to the 25 patients. In the last section of the questionnaire, where we asked what changes they would make, in 4 cases the answers were: "take the child's opinion into account more often", "improve preoperative information", "improve communication regarding postoperative care". and "improve block entry times". Conclusion: satisfaction levels of the assisted children caregivers are mostly good. We detected aspects to improve regarding adjustment of admission times into the surgical room as well as communication with the caregiver and the child regarding postoperative home care.


Introdução: a patologia de baixa complexidade representa um importante número das cirurgias que são realizadas em pediatria. A maioria das crianças não apresenta patologias prévias que requeiram cuidados especiais. As listas de espera para resolução de pacientes de baixa complexidade geralmente aumentam nos meses em que o hospital está sobrecarregado com internações, neste caso aumentaram nos últimos 2 anos, por causa da Pandemia da covid-19. Neste período, surgiu a necessidade de implementar um programa onde a patologia de baixa complexidade em pacientes que reúnam determinados critérios possa ser resolvida através de cirurgia ambulatorial. Isto implica um benefício tanto para a criança como para a família, com redução dos níveis de stress ligados ao internamento, menor probabilidade de contrair infeções nosocomiais, limitação do impacto socioeconômico ao nível familiar, bem como claros benefícios para o hospital, pois reduz a internação com custos reduzidos e diminui a necessidade de utilização de leitos de internação. Objetivo: analisar os resultados iniciais do programa de Cirurgia Ambulatorial do Hospital Pediátrico do CHPR baseados nos níveis de satisfação das famílias. Material e método: foram coletados os dados dos pacientes atendidos no sistema de Cirurgia Ambulatorial, no período de junho de 2021 a janeiro de 2022. Aplicamos um breve questionário para avaliar a satisfação com o programa, a fim de avaliar os resultados iniciais e exigir mudanças após o programa de benefício. Resultados: 35 pacientes ingressaram no programa no Departamento de Cirurgia Geral, pudemos realizar a pesquisa de satisfação de 25 pacientes. 100% dos inquiridos consideram que é positivo acompanhar os filhos ao centro cirúrgico. Detalhamos a resposta a cada ponto do questionário aplicado aos 25 pacientes. Na última seção do questionário, onde perguntávamos quais mudanças eles fariam, em 4 casos as respostas foram: "levar mais em conta a opinião da criança", "melhorar a informação pré-operatória", "melhorar a comunicação sobre os cuidados pós-operatórios" e "melhorar os tempos de entrada do bloco". Conclusão: o nível de satisfação dos cuidadores das crianças atendidas é em sua maioria bom. Detectamos aspectos a melhorar com base na adequação dos horários de admissão na sala cirúrgica e na comunicação com o cuidador e a criança sobre os cuidados pós-operatórios em casa.

16.
Rev. bras. enferm ; 77(1): e20230358, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1559453

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objectives: to psychometrically validate the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-INFO25 instrument and identify the domains that influence patients' perception of the information received. Methods: a cross-sectional methodology with cancer patients in a Brazilian philanthropic hospital institution. Sociodemographic and clinical instruments, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-INFO25 and Supportive Care Needs Survey - Short Form 34 were used. Analysis occurred using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, intraclass correlation, test-retest and exploratory factor analysis. Results: 128 respondents participated. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85. The test-retest obtained p-value=0.21. In the factor analysis, one item was excluded. Satisfaction with the information received was 74%, with three areas with averages below 70%. In open-ended questions, there was a greater desire for information. Conclusions: validity evidence was obtained with instrument reliability, consistency and stability. Respondents expressed satisfaction with the information received.


RESUMEN Objetivos: validar psicométricamente el instrumento European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-INFO25 e identificar los dominios que influyen en la percepción del paciente sobre la información recibida. Métodos: metodología transversal con pacientes con cáncer en una institución hospitalaria filantrópica brasileña. Se utilizaron instrumentos sociodemográficos y clínicos, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-INFO25 y Supportive Care Needs Survey - Short Form 34. El análisis se realizó mediante coeficientes alfa de Cronbach, correlación intraclase, prueba-reprueba y análisis factorial exploratorio. Resultados: participaron 128 encuestados. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach fue de 0,85. La prueba-reprueba obtuvo p-valor=0,21. En el análisis factorial se excluyó un ítem. La satisfacción con la información recibida fue del 74%, con tres áreas con promedios inferiores al 70%. En las preguntas abiertas hubo mayor deseo de información. Conclusiones: se obtuvo evidencia de validación con confiabilidad, consistencia y estabilidad del instrumento. Los encuestados expresaron satisfacción con la información recibida.


RESUMO Objetivos: validar psicometricamente o instrumento da European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-INFO25 e identificar os domínios que influenciam na percepção do paciente sobre as informações recebidas. Métodos: metodológico, transversal, com pacientes com câncer em instituição hospitalar filantrópica brasileira. Utilizaram-se instrumentos sociodemográficos e clínicos, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-INFO25 e Supportive Care Needs Survey - Short Form 34. Análise ocorreu utilizando coeficientes alfa de Cronbach, correlação intraclasse, teste-reteste e análise fatorial exploratória. Resultados: participaram 128 respondentes. O coeficiente alfa de Cronbach foi de 0,85. O teste-reteste obteve p-valor=0,21. Na análise fatorial, foi excluído um item. A satisfação da informação recebida foi de 74%, com três domínios com médias inferiores a 70%. Nas questões abertas, evidenciou-se maior desejo por informações. Conclusões: evidências de validação foram obtidas com confiabilidade, consistência e estabilidade do instrumento. Os respondentes demonstraram satisfação com as informações recebidas.

17.
Rev. cuba. med. mil ; 52(4)dic. 2023.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1559847

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La administración organizacional en salud busca garantizar una atención efectiva y una gestión eficiente; evalúa la atención y satisfacción que a su vez guardan una estrecha y compleja relación. Objetivo: Estimar la asociación entre la calidad de atención y la satisfacción del usuario externo, del servicio de laboratorio clínico. Métodos: Estudio cuantitativo, correlacional, de diseño observacional transversal. La población estudiada fueron usuarios atendidos en el servicio de laboratorio clínico de un hospital privado, en Lima, Perú, a quienes se les aplicó un cuestionario de elaboración propia sobre calidad de atención y otro de satisfacción del usuario adaptado del modelo SERVPERF. La información obtenida fue analizada con el software IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 y para la prueba de hipótesis se aplicó el coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Resultados: De los 220 usuarios encuestados, el 69,1 % calificó como alta la calidad brindada, en la cual la dimensión mejor calificada fue la calidad humana (71,8 %); asimismo, el 73,6 % de los usuarios afirmaron estar satisfechos y dentro de ello, las dimensiones con mayor satisfacción fueron la empatía (73,2 %) y la seguridad (73,1 %). Conclusiones: La calidad de atención y sus dimensiones que la conforman se asocian con la satisfacción de los usuarios.


Introduction: The healthcare management seeks to guarantee effective care and efficient management, assesses care and satisfaction, which in turn have a close and complex relationship. Objective: To estimate the association between the quality of care and the satisfaction of the external user of the clinical laboratory service. Methods: Quantitative, correlational study, with a cross-sectional observational design. The population studied were users treated in the clinical laboratory service of a private hospital in Lima, Peru, to whom a self-developed questionnaire was applied on quality of care and another on user satisfaction adapted from the SERVPERF model. The information obtained was analyzed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 software and Spearman's correlation coefficient was applied for the hypothesis test. Results: Of the 220 users surveyed, 69.1% rated the quality provided as high, in which the best rated dimension was human quality (71.8%); Likewise, 73.6% of the users stated that they were satisfied and within this, the dimensions with the greatest satisfaction were empathy (73.2%) and security (73.1%). Conclusions: The quality of care and its dimensions that make it up are associated with user satisfaction.

18.
Rev. latinoam. enferm. (Online) ; 31: e3923, ene.-dic. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1441995

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: examinar el efecto de la técnica de tos de mediana intensidad durante la inyección subcutánea de heparina de bajo peso molecular sobre la severidad del dolor y la satisfacción individual en pacientes de cirugía general. Método: estudio prospectivo, cuasi experimental, que incluyó a 100 pacientes a los que se les prescribió una inyección subcutánea de heparina de bajo peso molecular una vez cada 24 horas. Cada paciente recibió dos inyecciones por el mismo investigador utilizando técnica de inyección estándar con técnica de tos de intensidad media y solo técnica de inyección estándar. Resultados: hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre las puntuaciones medias de los pacientes sobre la intensidad del dolor y los niveles de satisfacción después de las inyecciones administradas por las dos técnicas (p= 0,000). Además, se encontró que el género afectó la severidad del dolor relacionado con la inyección, pero no afectó el nivel de satisfacción individual. Conclusión: se encontró que la técnica de tos de intensidad media reduce la severidad del dolor y aumenta la satisfacción del paciente de cirugía general que reciben inyecciones subcutáneas de heparina de bajo peso molecular. Registro del ensayo: NCT05681338.


Objective: to examine the effect of the medium intensity coughing technique during subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin injection on pain severity and individual satisfaction in general surgery patients. Method: the prospective, quasi-experimental study included 100 patients who had been prescribed a subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin injection once in 24 hours. Each patient received two injections by the same researcher, one using the standard injection technique with medium intensity coughing technique and the other only the standard injection technique. Results: there was a statistically significant difference between patients' mean scores on pain severity and satisfaction levels after injections administered by the two techniques (p= 0.000). Also, it was found that gender affected pain severity relating to the injection but did not affect the level of individual satisfaction. Conclusion: the medium intensity coughing technique was found to reduce pain severity and increase patient satisfaction in general surgery patients receiving subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin injections. Trial registration: NCT05681338.


Objetivo: examinar o efeito da técnica de tosse de média intensidade durante injeção subcutânea de heparina de baixo peso molecular na intensidade da dor e satisfação individual em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia geral. Método: estudo prospetivo, quasi experimental que incluiu 100 pacientes que haviam recebido uma injeção subcutânea de heparina de baixo peso molecular em 24 horas. Cada paciente recebeu duas injeções pelo mesmo pesquisador usando a técnica de injeção padrão com técnica de tosse de média intensidade e apenas técnica de injeção padrão. Resultados: houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as pontuações médias dos pacientes quanto à gravidade da dor e níveis de satisfação após as injeções administradas pelas duas técnicas (p = 0,000). Além disso, verificou-se que o sexo do paciente afetou a intensidade da dor relacionada à injeção, mas não afetou o nível de satisfação individual. Conclusão: a técnica de tosse de média intensidade reduz a intensidade da dor e aumenta a satisfação de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia geral recebendo injeções subcutâneas de heparina de baixo peso molecular. Registro do ensaio clínico: NCT05681338.


Subject(s)
Humans , General Surgery , Pain Measurement , Heparin , Prospective Studies , Patient Satisfaction , Cough , Anticoagulants
19.
Vive (El Alto) ; 6(18): 726-735, dic. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1530579

ABSTRACT

Con la llegada de la pandemia del COVID-19, el gobierno peruano realizó modificaciones en el sistema de salud, dando paso al decreto legislativo N° 117-2020, para el servicio de telemedicina dentro del sector de la salud pública y privada, entendiéndose como la comunicación entre el paciente y el profesional médico a través de un dispositivo como computadora o teléfono. Objetivo. Identificar los niveles de satisfacción en la atención del servicio por telemedicina de los pacientes de una clínica privada de especialidades médicas en la ciudad de Puno durante la pandemia por COVID-19. Materiales y métodos. El diseño del estudio fue observacional, prospectivo; previo consentimiento informado, se aplicó el cuestionario The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form [PSQ-18] de manera virtual a 56 pacientes mayores de 18 años seleccionados de manera no probabilística durante la pandemia mediante la telemedicina en una clínica de Puno durante el 2020 y 2021. Resultados. El 55,4% de los pacientes se mostraron parcialmente satisfechos y el 39,3% indicaron estar satisfechos; encontrándose asociación estadística significativa entre la satisfacción de la atención de salud mediante telemedicina con la edad del paciente (p<0,01*); las dimensiones del cuestionario mostraron medias ligeramente altas, destacando las dimensiones Accesibilidad y comodidad (12,93±3,13); Calidad técnica (12,34±3,56); Trato interpersonal (6,45±1,32); aspectos financieros (6,32±1,52) y satisfacción general (6,11±1,88). Conclusiones. Las dimensiones referidas a la calidad técnica, comodidad y accesibilidad fueron reportadas con mayores niveles de satisfacción, estos hallazgos contribuyen a la evidencia sobre la aceptación de la telemedicina como una alternativa viable para brindar atención de calidad.


With the arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Peruvian government made changes in the health system, giving way to Legislative Decree No. 117-2020, for the telemedicine service within the public and private health sector, understood as the communication between the patient and the medical professional through a device such as a computer or telephone. Objective. To identify the levels of satisfaction with the telemedicine service provided to patients in a private medical specialty clinic in the city of Puno during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The study design was observational, prospective; prior informed consent, The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form [PSQ-18] was applied virtually to 56 patients over 18 years of age selected in a non-probabilistic manner during the pandemic through telemedicine in a clinic in Puno during 2020 and 2021. Results. 55.4% of the patients were partially satisfied and 39.3% were satisfied; a significant statistical association was found between satisfaction with health care through telemedicine and the patient's age (p<0.01*); the dimensions of the questionnaire showed slightly high averages, highlighting the dimensions Accessibility and comfort (12.93±3.13); Technical quality (12.34±3.56); Interpersonal treatment (6.45±1.32); financial aspects (6.32±1.52) and general satisfaction (6.11±1.88). Conclusions. The dimensions referring to technical quality, comfort and accessibility were reported with higher levels of satisfaction, these findings contribute to the evidence on the acceptance of telemedicine as a viable alternative to provide quality care.


Com a chegada da pandemia da COVID-19, o governo peruano realizou mudanças no sistema de saúde, dando lugar ao Decreto Legislativo nº 117-2020, para o serviço de telemedicina no setor de saúde pública e privada, entendido como a comunicação entre o paciente e o profissional médico por meio de um dispositivo como computador ou telefone. Objetivo. Identificar a satisfação do paciente com o atendimento de telemedicina em uma clínica privada de especialidades médicas na cidade de Puno durante a pandemia da COVID-19. Materiais e métodos. O desenho do estudo foi observacional, prospectivo; após o consentimento informado, o Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form [PSQ-18] foi aplicado virtualmente a 56 pacientes maiores de 18 anos selecionados de forma não probabilística durante a pandemia por meio da telemedicina em uma clínica em Puno durante 2020 e 2021. Resultados. 55,4% dos pacientes estavam parcialmente satisfeitos e 39,3% estavam satisfeitos; foi encontrada uma associação estatisticamente significativa entre a satisfação com o atendimento de saúde por telemedicina e a idade do paciente (p<0,01*); as dimensões do questionário apresentaram médias ligeiramente elevadas, com destaque para as dimensões Acessibilidade e conforto (12,93±3,13); Qualidade técnica (12,34±3,56); Tratamento interpessoal (6,45±1,32); Aspectos financeiros (6,32±1,52) e Satisfação geral (6,11±1,88). Conclusões. As dimensões referentes à qualidade técnica, ao conforto e à acessibilidade foram relatadas com níveis mais altos de satisfação. Esses achados contribuem para as evidências sobre a aceitação da telemedicina como uma alternativa viável para fornecer atendimento de qualidade.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Quality of Health Care
20.
Horiz. enferm ; 34(3): 539-560, 20 dic. 2023. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1525224

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN. La atención de urgencia reviste características particulares, conjugándose múltiples factores que impactan en la calidad del servicio prestado, siendo su evaluación crucial para mejorar la satisfacción de los usuarios. No obstante, la utilización de encuestas no siempre logra profundizar la experiencia del paciente y del personal que presta el servicio. OBJETIVO. Conocer la calidad percibida por los usuarios de un servicio de urgencia de una clínica privada de Chile. METODOLOGÍA. Investigación cualitativa, descriptiva en la que participaron 20 pacientes, cinco familiares y diez integrantes del equipo de salud. Para la recolección de datos se realizaron entrevistas semiestructuradas y observación no participante. Se utilizó un enfoque inductivo para analizar los datos, realizando codificación selectiva y axial en base a siete categorías predefinidas basadas en las dimensiones de calidad. RESULTADOS. Del análisis de los discursos se obtuvieron seis categorías y 16 subcategorías de calidad de atención, siendo las más relevantes la oportunidad, la calidez, el confort y calidad técnica y capacidad resolutiva. En el caso del personal de salud, emergió la violencia por parte de pacientes o familiares como un factor relevante que impacta negativamente en la calidad. CONCLUSIÓN. Existió coincidencia en la percepción del personal de salud, pacientes y familiares. Se identificaron como fortalezas la amabilidad del personal, así como la accesibilidad y oportunidad de la información al paciente respecto de los procesos de atención. Se detectaron oportunidades de mejora relacionadas a los tiempos de espera, la presencia de especialistas y a la privacidad que ofrecen los boxes de atención.


INTRODUCTION: Emergency care involves multiple factors that impact the quality of the service provided, and its evaluation is crucial to enhance user satisfaction. However, the use of surveys does not always succeed in revealing the patient's experience and the experiences of staff who provide the service. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the perceived quality of care by users of an emergency department in a private clinic in Chile. METHODOLOGY: Qualitative, descriptive research involving 15 patients, five relatives and ten healthcare team members. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and non-participant observation. An inductive approach was used to analyze the data, implementing selective and axial coding based on seven pre-defined categories grounded on quality dimensions. RESULTS: From the analysis of the data, six categories and 16 subcategories of care quality were obtained, with the most relevant being timeliness, warmth, comfort, technical quality, and problem-solving capacity. In the case of health personnel, violence by patients or family members emerged as a relevant factor that negatively impacts quality. CONCLUSION: There was agreement in the perception of healthcare personnel, patients, and relatives. The friendliness of the staff, as well as the accessibility and timeliness of information provided to the patient regarding care processes, were identified as strengths. Opportunities for improvement were detected related to waiting times, the presence of specialists, and the privacy offered in the care setting.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...