Magnesium sulfate and risk of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a high-risk cohort.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy contributes to morbidity and mortality among neonates ≥36 weeks of gestation. Evidence of preventative antenatal treatment is limited. Magnesium sulfate has neuroprotective properties among preterm fetuses. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a risk factor for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, and magnesium sulfate is recommended for maternal seizure prophylaxis among patients with preeclampsia with severe features. OBJECTIVE: (1) Determine trends in the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, antenatal magnesium sulfate, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; (2) evaluate the association between hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; and (3) evaluate if, among patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, the odds of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is mitigated by receipt of antenatal magnesium sulfate. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed a prospective cohort of live births ≥36 weeks of gestation between 2012 and 2018 within the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative registry, linked with the California Department of Health Care Access and Information files. We used Cochran-Armitage tests to assess trends in hypertensive disorders, encephalopathy diagnoses, and magnesium sulfate utilization and compared demographic factors between patients with or without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or treatment with magnesium sulfate. Hierarchical logistic regression models were built to explore if hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with any severity and moderate/severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Separate hierarchical logistic regression models were built among those with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to evaluate the association of magnesium sulfate with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. RESULTS: Among 44,314 unique infants, the diagnosis of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and the use of magnesium sulfate increased over time. Compared with patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone, patients with hypertensive disorders treated with magnesium sulfate represented a high-risk population. They were more likely to be publicly insured, born between 36 and 38 weeks of gestation, be small for gestational age, have lower Apgar scores, require a higher level of resuscitation at delivery, have prolonged rupture of membranes, experience preterm labor and fetal distress, and undergo operative delivery (all P<.002). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.40]; P<.001) and specifically moderate/severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.42]; P<.001). Among patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, treatment with magnesium sulfate was associated with 29% reduction in the odds of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.97]; P=.03) and a 37% reduction in the odds of moderate/severe neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.63 [95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.94]; P=.03). CONCLUSION: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and, specifically, moderate/severe disease. Among people with hypertensive disorders, receipt of antenatal magnesium sulfate is associated with a significant reduction in the odds of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and moderate/severe disease in a neonatal cohort admitted to neonatal intensive care unit at ≥36 weeks of gestation. The findings of this observational study cannot prove causality and are intended to generate hypotheses for future clinical trials on magnesium sulfate in term infants.

Effectiveness of Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in preventing seizure in traumatic brain injury patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the subsequent Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) is a growing public health concern. Generally, anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) are recommended for PTS prophylaxis and treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to review the current state of knowledge and the evidence for the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) on the incidence of seizure in TBI patients compared to Phenytoin (PHT). METHODS: A search was carried out based on PubMed, MEDLINE, Europe PMC database, and Cochrane Library up to November 2023. A total of 16 studies (3 randomized clinical trials, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 prospective cohort studies) including 5821 TBI patients included in our meta-analysis. We included studies comparing LEV and PHT after brain injury in both adults and children. Risk of bias assessment was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a risk-of-bias tool (RoB-2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of cohort studies. Two RCTs in our meta-analysis had a high risk of bias, therefore we applied sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our results. RESULTS: The most commonly reported dosage for LEV was 500 mg twice daily and for PHT it was 5 mg/kg. There was no significant difference between LEV and PHT groups in reducing the early seizure incidence (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.60, 1.21]; p = 0.375, fixed-effect, I2 = 21.75%). The result of sensitivity analysis for late seizure showed no significant difference between LEV and PHT in reducing the late seizure occurrence after TBI (OR = 0.87; 95% CI = [0.21, 3.67]; p = 0.853, fixed-effect, I2 = 0%). The mortality in TBI patients treated with LEV was not statistically significant compared to the PHT group (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = [0.92, 1.34], p = 0.266). The length of stay in the hospital was not significantly different between the LEV and PHT groups (MD = -1.33; 95% CI = [-4.55, 1.90]; p = 0.421). However, in comparison to PHT, LEV shortened the length of ICU stay (MD = -2.25; 95% CI = [-3.58, -0.91]; p =0.001). In terms of adverse effects, more patients in the PHT group have experienced adverse events compared to LEV but the difference was not significant (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = [0.44, 1.08]; p = 0. 11). CONCLUSION: The results of our meta-analysis showed LEV and PHT have similar effects on the occurrence of early and late seizures in TBI patients. Therefore, none of the drugs is superior to the other in reducing PTS. However, treating TBI patients with LEV did not shorten the length of hospital stay in comparison to PHT but reduced the length of ICU stay significantly. The analysis showed that patients in the LEV experienced fewer side effects than in the PHT group, while it was not sufficiently clear whether all reported side effects were related to the drug alone or other factors. The mortality was similar between the LEV and PHT groups. Finally, we recommend more high-quality randomized controlled trials to confirm the current findings before making any recommendations in practice.

Low-velocity penetrating brain injury: a review of the literature and illustrative case.

INTRODUCTION: Low-velocity penetrating brain injury (LVPBI) is a class of brain injury where a foreign object violates the skull and damages the brain. Such injuries are rare and consequently understudied. CASE: As such, we report an illustrative case of a 29-year-old female with a dense, plastic spike penetrating her right orbit and into her midbrain. After assessment with a CT scan and angiography, the object was removed with careful attention to possible vascular injury. The patient had an uncomplicated post-operative course and received antibiotic and antiepileptic prophylaxis. She was discharged on post-operative day 5, experiencing only mild left-sided weakness. DISCUSSION: Common concerns regarding LVPBI include infection, post-traumatic epilepsy, and vascular injury. A review of published LVPBI cases over the past 20 years demonstrated that most cases (55.2%) are due to accidents. Of patients undergoing surgery, 43.4% underwent a craniotomy, and 22.8% underwent a craniectomy. Despite the grave nature of LVPBI, only 13.5% of the patients died. Additionally, 6.5% of patients developed an infection over their clinical course. CONCLUSION: In all, more reported cases further paint a picture of the current state of management and outcomes regarding LVPBI, paving the way for more cohesive guidelines to ensure the best possible patient outcomes.

Enhanced renal clearance impacts levetiracetam concentrations in patients with traumatic brain injury with and without augmented renal clearance.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of ARC on levetiracetam concentrations during the first week following acute TBI. The hypothesis was levetiracetam concentrations are significantly lower in TBI patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) compared to those with normal renal clearance. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort pharmacokinetic study of adults with moderate to severe TBI treated with levetiracetam during the first week after injury. Serial blood collections were performed daily for analysis of levetiracetam, cystatin C, and 12-hr creatinine clearance (CrCl) determinations. Patients were divided into two cohorts: with (CrCl ≥130 ml/min/1.73 m2) and without ARC. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe TBI were included. The population consisted primarily of young male patients with severe TBI (mean age 40 years old, 68% male, median admission GCS 4). Each received levetiracetam 1000 mg IV every 12 h for the study period. ARC was present in 77.3% of patients, with significantly lower levetiracetam concentrations in ARC patients and below the conservative therapeutic range (< 6mcg/mL) for all study days. In patients without ARC, the serum concentrations were also below the expected range on all but two study days (Days 4 and 5). Four of the 22 (18.2%) patients exhibited seizure activity during the study period (two of these patients exhibited ARC). Cystatin C concentrations were significantly lower in patients with ARC, though the mean for all patients was within the typical normal range. CONCLUSIONS: ARC has a high prevalence in patients with moderate to severe TBI. Levetiracetam concentrations after standard dosing were low in all TBI patients, but significantly lower in patients with ARC. This study highlights the need to consider personalized drug dosing in TBI patients irrespective of the presence of ARC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at cliicaltrials.gov (NCT02437838) Registered on 08/05/2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02437838 .

Outcomes Associated With Levetiracetam Use After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of seizures in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who received prophylactic levetiracetam. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the use of levetiracetam in patients without a history of seizures who experienced a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years of age, had a documented history of a seizure disorder, or had an antiseizure drug documented on their home medication list. Patients were based on their exposure to levetiracetam. The primary outcome was incidence of seizure during hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. Results: Of the 229 patients included in the final analysis, 21 were in the levetiracetam group (LEV) and 208 were in the no levetiracetam group (no LEV). No statistical difference in seizure incidence was observed when comparing the LEV and no LEV groups (1 [4.8%] LEV vs 3 [1.4%] no LEV; P = .32). There was also no statistical difference in the median ICU LOS (2 days [1 day, 5 days] LEV vs 2 days [1 day, 3 days] no LEV; P = .27), median hospital LOS (6 days [2 days, 8 days] LEV vs 6 days [3 days, 9 days] no LEV; P = .27), or adverse events. Conclusions: This study does not support the use of levetiracetam prophylaxis in patients who have experienced an ICH.

Postoperative Seizure Prophylaxis in Meningioma Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Seizures in the early postoperative period may impair patient recovery and increase the risk of complications. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is any advantage in postoperative seizure prophylaxis following meningioma resection. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED, Web of Science, Embase, Science Direct, and Cochrane were searched for papers until April 2023. RESULTS: Among nine studies, a total of 3249 patients were evaluated, of which 984 patients received antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). No significant difference was observed in the frequency of seizure events between patients who were treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and those who were not. (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.40; I2 = 57%). Postoperative seizures occurred in 5% (95% CI: 1% to 9%) within the early time period (<7 days), and 9% (95% CI: 1% to 17%) in the late time period (>7 days), with significant heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 91% and 97%, respectively). In seizure-naive patients, the rate of postoperative seizures was 2% (95% CI: 0% to 6%) in the early period and increased to 6% (95% CI: 0% to 15%) in the late period. High heterogeneity led to the use of random-effects models in all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence does not provide sufficient support for the effectiveness of prophylactic AED medications in preventing postoperative seizures in patients undergoing meningioma resection. This underscores the importance of considering diagnostic criteria and conducting individual patient analysis to guide clinical decision-making in this context.

Discontinuation of Levetiracetam and Valproic Acid Due to Adverse Effects in Early Post-traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Levetiracetam (LEV) and valproic acid (VPA) are two anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) routinely used for post-traumatic seizure (PTS) prophylaxis at our institution. In our practice, VPA is used for its beneficial effects on behavioral agitation and headaches, but it is also associated with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs). Both medications may be associated with thrombocytopenia. There is less literature comparing the adverse effect profiles and discontinuation rates of LEV and VPA in the context of PTS prophylaxis. We conducted a quality improvement (QI) analysis to determine the safety of LEV and VPA for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients at our institution. In particular, our QI analysis involved calculating the rates of discontinuation or change of drug regimen due to the adverse effects. METHODS: Our QI analysis focused on patients treated for TBI at our institution during a six-year period. We recorded the AED used and if the AED was discontinued or switched due to thrombocytopenia, behavioral agitation, headaches, or elevated LFTs (including elevated aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase values). We also recorded the incidence of early PTS, defined as seizures within seven days of the TBI. RESULTS: Our QI analysis included patients with a mean age of approximately 49 years with nearly 75% males. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 12.88, with 73.11% of patients having a mild GCS. The three leading injury mechanisms were fall, assault, and motor vehicle collision. The three leading types of TBI were traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and cerebral contusion. Among patients with no prior history of seizures, we found an early PTS incidence of 7.28%. For patients administered LEV and VPA, 0.11% (1/898) and 3.85% (4/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001), respectively. For patients on LEV, 4.01% (36/898) and 1.78% (16/898) had the medication discontinued or changed because of behavioral agitation and headaches, respectively. For patients on VPA, 2.88% (3/104) had the medication discontinued or changed because of hepatotoxicity. In total, 5.90% versus 6.73% (p > 0.5) of patients on LEV and VPA, respectively, had their medication regimens changed due to the adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of early PTS in our patients is within the range of what has been reported in the literature. The rate of discontinuation of LEV and VPA on account of adverse events is low in the context of PTS prophylaxis. Both medications had similar overall rates of discontinuation. VPA was discontinued more frequently than LEV due to thrombocytopenia, but discontinuation was not common in either case. LEV is associated with behavioral agitation and headaches, which makes VPA a desirable alternative for patients suffering from these symptoms.

A Retrospective Case Series on Valproic Acid for Early Post-Traumatic Seizure Prophylaxis After Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Concomitant Agitation.

Purpose: Early post-traumatic seizures occur within 7 days following a traumatic brain injury and may lead to additional brain damage and poor outcomes. Levetiracetam or phenytoin is often used for seizure prophylaxis in this patient population, but valproic acid may be an appropriate therapeutic alternative in patients with concomitant agitation. Evidence for the use of valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation is limited. The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation. Methods: This single-center, retrospective case series includes 18 patients who received valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis and agitation. Efficacy for early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis is assessed by the incidence of seizures within 7 days of injury. Efficacy for agitation is assessed by changes in Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale scores during valproic acid therapy. The safety of valproic acid is defined by the incidence of selected adverse events. Results: Among 18 patients with traumatic brain injuries receiving valproic acid for both early post-traumatic seizures and agitation, one patient experienced a seizure during the period of prophylaxis and thrombocytopenia was the most common adverse event. Conclusion: In this small cohort of patients, valproic acid appears be a potential option to prevent early post-traumatic seizures in patients with traumatic brain injuries and concomitant agitation with minimal adverse effects. Randomized, controlled studies are needed to further investigate the role of valproic acid for this indication, including standards for dosing regimens, serum drug monitoring, and the relationship between valproic acid treatment and mortality.

Prognosis and management of acute symptomatic seizures: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Acute symptomatic epileptic seizures are frequently seen in neurocritical care. To prevent subsequent unprovoked seizures, long-term treatments with antiseizure medications are often initiated although supporting evidence is lacking. This study aimed at prospectively assessing the risk of unprovoked seizure relapse with respect to the use of antiseizure medications. It was hypothesized that after a first acute symptomatic seizure of structural etiology, the cumulative 12-month risk of unprovoked seizure relapse is ≤ 25%. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 and acute symptomatic first-ever epileptic seizure; patients with status epilepticus were excluded. Using telephone and mail interviews, participants were followed for 12 months after the acute symptomatic first seizure. Primary endpoint was the occurrence and timing of a first unprovoked seizure relapse. In addition, neuro-intensivists in Germany were interviewed about their antiseizure treatment strategies through an anonymous online survey. RESULTS: Eleven of 122 participants with structural etiology had an unprovoked seizure relapse, resulting in a cumulative 12-month risk of 10.7% (95%CI, 4.7%-16.7%). None of 19 participants with a non-structural etiology had a subsequent unprovoked seizure. Compared to structural etiology alone, combined infectious and structural etiology was independently associated with unprovoked seizure relapse (OR 11.1; 95%CI, 1.8-69.7). Median duration of antiseizure treatment was 3.4 months (IQR 0-9.3). Seven out of 11 participants had their unprovoked seizure relapse while taking antiseizure medication; longer treatment durations were not associated with decreased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse. Following the non-representative online survey, most neuro-intensivists consider 3 months or less of antiseizure medication to be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Even in case of structural etiology, acute symptomatic seizures bear a low risk of subsequent unprovoked seizures. There is still no evidence favoring long-term treatments with antiseizure medications. Hence, individual constellations with an increased risk of unprovoked seizure relapse should be identified, such as central nervous system infections causing structural brain damage. However, in the absence of high-risk features, antiseizure medications should be discontinued early to avoid overtreatment.

Pharmacokinetics of Levetiracetam Seizure Prophylaxis in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Drug pharmacokinetics (PK) are altered in neurocritically ill patients, and optimal levetiracetam dosing for seizure prophylaxis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates levetiracetam PK in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) receiving intravenous levetiracetam 1000 mg every 8 (LEV8) to 12 (LEV12) hours for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS: This prospective, open-label study was conducted at a level 1 trauma, academic, quaternary care center. Patients with sTBI receiving seizure prophylaxis with LEV8 or LEV12 were eligible for enrollment. Five sequential, steady-state, postdose serum levetiracetam concentrations were obtained. Non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and compartmental approaches were employed for estimating pharmacokinetic parameters and projecting steady-state trough concentrations. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between LEV8 and LEV12 patients. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed to determine probability of target trough attainment (PTA) of 6 to 20 mg/L. A secondary analysis evaluated PTA for weight-tiered levetiracetam dosing. RESULTS: Ten male patients (5 LEV8; 5 LEV12) were included. The NCA-based systemic clearance and elimination half-life were 5.3 ± 1.2 L/h and 4.8 ± 0.64 hours. A one-compartment model provided a higher steady-state trough concentration for the LEV8 group compared with the LEV12 group (13.7 ± 4.3 mg/L vs 6.3 ± 1.7 mg/L; P = 0.008). Monte Carlo simulations predicted regimens of 500 mg every 6 hours, 1000 mg every 8 hours, and 2000 mg every 12 hours achieved therapeutic target attainment. Weight-tiered dosing regimens achieved therapeutic target attainment using a 75 kg breakpoint. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Neurocritically ill patients exhibit rapid levetiracetam clearance resulting in a short elimination half-life. Findings of this study suggest regimens of levetiracetam 500 mg every 6 hours, 1000 mg every 8 hours, or 2000 mg every 12 hours may be required for optimal therapeutic target attainment. Patient weight of 75 kg may serve as a breakpoint for weight-guided dosing to optimize levetiracetam therapeutic target attainment for seizure prophylaxis.

A randomized controlled trial of loading dose alone versus pritchard regimen of magnesium sulphate, for seizure prophylaxis in severe preeclampsia.

Background: Preeclampsia poses a significant risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Magnesium sulfate superiority for seizure prophylaxis in severe preeclampsia has been proven globally. However, the search for the lowest effective dose is an area of continuing research. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of loading dose with the Pritchard regimen of magnesium sulfate for seizure prophylaxis in severe preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: A total of 138 eligible women after 28-week gestation with severe preeclampsia were randomized to either receiving a single loading dose of MgSO4 (study arm: n = 69) or Pritchard regimen of MgSO4 (control: n = 69). The effectiveness was assessed by the development of seizure. The results obtained were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test and normally distributed continuous variables were analyzed with t-test and Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistical significance. Results: There were no significant differences between those who received only the loading dose when compared with those who had Pritchard regimen other than a single recorded convulsion among the control group (P = 0.316). Similarly, except for the duration of hospital stay which was significantly longer in the Pritchard group (P = 0.019), both the arms of the study shared similar maternal and fetal outcomes. Conclusion: This study suggests the effectiveness of just the loading dose of magnesium sulfate when compared with the standardized Pritchard regimen in the prevention of seizure among women with severe preeclampsia. The study also demonstrated safety and similarity in fetal-maternal outcome. The loading dose only had an added advantage of shorter duration of hospital stay.

Résumé Contexte: La prééclampsie pose un risque important de morbidité et de mortalité maternelle et néonatale. La supériorité du sulfate de magnésium pour 15 prophylaxies épileptiques dans la prééclampsie sévère a été prouvée à l'échelle mondiale. Cependant, la recherche de la dose efficace la plus faible est un domaine de recherche continue. Objectif: L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer l'efficacité de la dose de charge avec le schéma de Pritchard de sulfate de magnésium pour la prophylaxie de 17 épilepsies dans la prééclampsie sévère. Matériels et méthodes: Un total de 138 femmes éligibles après 28 semaines de gestation atteintes de 18 prééclampsie ont été randomisés pour recevoir soit une dose de charge unique de MgSO4 (groupe d'étude : n = 69) soit un régime de Pritchard de MgSO4 (contrôle : n = 69). L'efficacité a été évaluée par le développement de saisie. Les résultats obtenus ont été analysés à l'aide de SPSS version 21. Les 19 variables catégorielles ont été analysées à l'aide du test du chi carré et les variables continues normalement distribuées ont été analysées à l'aide du test t et du test exact de Fisher. 20 P < 0,05 était considéré comme une signification statistique. Résultats: Il n'y avait pas de différences significatives entre ceux qui n'avaient reçu que la dose de charge 21 par rapport à ceux qui avaient reçu le régime de Pritchard autre qu'une seule convulsion enregistrée parmi le groupe témoin (P = 0,316). 22 De même, à l'exception de la durée du séjour à l'hôpital qui était significativement plus longue dans le groupe Pritchard (P = 0,019), les deux bras de l'étude 23 partageaient des résultats maternels et fœtaux similaires. Conclusion: Cette étude suggère l'efficacité de la seule dose de charge de sulfate de magnésium par rapport au régime de Pritchard standardisé dans la prévention des convulsions chez les femmes atteintes de prééclampsie sévère. L'étude a également démontré 24 l'innocuité et la similarité des résultats fœto-maternels. La dose de charge n'avait qu'un avantage supplémentaire de durée d'hospitalisation plus courte. 25. Mots-clés: Éclampsie, dose de charge, sulfate de magnésium, régime de Pritchard, prophylaxie des crises, prééclampsie sévère.

Levetiracetam dosing for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Levetiracetam is used for seizure prophylaxis in patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or traumatic brain injury (TBI). We aim to characterize the optimal levetiracetam dosage for seizure prophylaxis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients at an academic tertiary hospital presenting with SAH or TBI who received levetiracetam at a total daily dose (TDD) equivalent to or greater than 1000 mg. The primary outcome was combined seizure incidence, including clinical and subclinical seizures. RESULTS: We identified 139 patients (49.6% male, mean age 53 years) for inclusion. For patients receiving a 1000-mg TDD, the administration was 500 mg twice daily. For patients receiving >1000-mg TDD, 77/78 patients received 1000 mg twice daily and one patient received 750 mg twice daily. Patients receiving 1000-mg TDD had a higher seizure incidence than those receiving >1000-mg TDD (p = 0.01), despite no difference in examined confounders, including history of alcoholism (p = 0.49), benzodiazepine use (p = 0.28), or propofol use (p = 0.17). No difference in adverse effects was observed (anemia, p = 0.44; leukopenia, p = 0.60; thrombocytopenia, p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Patients may experience a reduced incidence of clinical and electroencephalographic seizures with levetiracetam dosing >1000-mg TDD.

Valproate-Induced Encephalopathy Presenting at Therapeutic Blood Concentrations: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Patients presenting with hyperammonemic encephalopathy are likely to have hepatic encephalopathy. However, valproate (an anticonvulsant and mood stabilizer) can also cause hyperammonemic encephalopathy and belongs on the differential for patients taking it, especially if there are recent contributory medication changes. We present a case report of a 61-year-old woman with valproate-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy but with an initial valproate level within the therapeutic range (50-100 mcg/dL). After withholding valproate and before additional treatment could be initiated, she became fully alert and oriented. We present a literature review exploring valproate toxicity and treatment. Our case shows that clinical suspicion for valproate-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy is warranted even if the valproate level is within the therapeutic range.

Assessing risk factors associated with breakthrough early post-traumatic seizures in patients receiving phenytoin prophylaxis.

Objective: Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) is a well-known complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with breakthrough early PTS in TBI patients receiving phenytoin prophylaxis. Methods: This was a single-centered retrospective study including adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), had a TBI, and started on phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis within 24 h of admission. The primary outcome was the incidence and factors associated with early PTS, defined as a confirmed seizure on a continuous electroencephalogram within 7 days of TBI. Secondary outcomes included the association between early post-traumatic seizures and ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 105 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with early PTS were older (65 vs. 48 years old, p = 0.01), had a higher Marshall score (5 vs. 2, p = 0.01), were more likely to have a Marshall score > 2 (73 vs. 37%, p = 0.01), and had more neurosurgeries for hematoma evacuation (57 vs. 19%, p = 0.01). In patients with early PTS, 57% had a level at the time of seizure, and of those, 87.5% had a therapeutic level (>10 mcg/mL). Patients with early PTS had a longer ICU length of stay (14.7 vs. 5.9 days, p = 0.04) and a greater proportion of hospital mortality (21 vs. 2%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Patients with higher age, Marshall score, and neurosurgical procedures for hematoma evacuation had higher incidences of breakthrough early PTS despite the use of phenytoin prophylaxis. The majority of patients with early PTS had therapeutic phenytoin levels at the time of seizure when a level was available; however, approximately half (43%) did not have a level.

Phenytoin as seizure prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with busulfan conditioning.

Background: Phenytoin is widely used as primary seizure prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning with busulfan. Because of the negative side effects of phenytoin, we abandoned phenytoin use in these patients. To assess the effect of this change, we performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients receiving busulfan. Methods: We included 139 patients who underwent conditioning with busulfan for hematopoietic stem cell therapy. We registered the use of phenytoin, as well as the occurrence of seizures, until 7 days after busulfan administration. We compared seizure incidence between patients who received phenytoin and those who did not. Results: Of the 43 patients who received phenytoin prophylaxis, four patients (9.3%) had a seizure during the conditioning regimen, of which two patients had cerebral non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Furthermore, all these 4 patients had very high levels of phenytoin (intoxication). Of the 96 patients that did not receive phenytoin prophylaxis, three patients (3.1%) had a seizure, and one of these patients had an undefined cerebral lesion. Phenytoin did not relate to seizure prevention in a logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: We conclude that phenytoin prophylaxis in patients treated with busulfan is obsolete and possibly harmful, as phenytoin intoxication can occur. We recommend discontinuing the use of phenytoin as primary seizure prophylaxis in these patients.

Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning.

INTRODUCTION: In seizure-naive brain tumor patients, the efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment remains controversial. In case of administration, the common preferred drug is levetiracetam (LEV) because of its favorable pharmacological profile. Research to date has not sufficiently determined how LEV affects cognition in the short term, as is the case in the perioperative period. The objective of this prospective study was to examine the neurocognitive functioning of seizure-naive brain tumor patients after receiving LEV perioperatively. METHODS: Fortythree patients with supratentorial brain tumor scheduled for surgery received LEV three days before until six days after surgery as seizure prophylaxis. Cognitive functioning (NeuroCogFX), LEV plasma-levels, hematotoxicity, side-effects, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Qolie31), were recorded preoperatively before (Baseline) and after onset of LEV (Pre-Op), 4-6 days postoperatively (Post-Op) and 21 days postoperatively (Follow-Up). RESULTS: No significant changes in cognitive functioning and HRQoL were seen after onset of preoperative LEV. There was a significant improvement of NeuroCogFX total-score at Follow-Up (p = 0.004) compared to Baseline. The overall-score Qolie31 showed simultaneous improvement patterns as cognitive functioning (p < 0.001). The most frequent side effect related to study drug was somnolence (in 28.6% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: A significant improvement of cognitive functioning, as well as an improvement in HRQoL, were detected postoperatively. This is presumably due to the debulking effect of the surgery. Nevertheless, LEV has no detrimental effect on cognitive functioning in the perioperative phase in seizure-naive brain tumor patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered prospectively (Date: 25/11/2015; EudraCT: 2015-003,916-19).

A novel 12-hour versus 24-hour magnesium sulfate regimen in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia in Ghana (MOPEP Study): A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy of a 12-h versus 24-h regimen of intramuscular magnesium sulfate in the management of eclampsia and preeclampsia. METHODS: This is an open-labeled parallel randomized controlled trial conducted in Accra, Ghana from November 2018 to November 2020. Participants were adult pregnant women admitted to the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) with a diagnosis of antepartum, intrapartum, or postpartum eclampsia or preeclampsia with severe features, having received no more than a loading dose of magnesium sulfate prior to admission at KBTH. Participants in the standard 24-h group received a loading dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g intravenous and 10 g intramuscular (5 g in each buttock) followed by six, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 24 h. Participants in the 12-h intervention group received the same loading dose followed by three, 5 g intramuscular maintenance doses over 12 h. The primary outcome was occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned magnesium sulfate regimen. Secondary outcomes were magnesium sulfate toxicity, magnesium sulfate side effects, maternal outcomes (mode of delivery, duration of inpatient admission, duration of urethral catheterization), maternal complications (pulmonary edema, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, death), and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Among 1176 total participants, we found no difference in occurrence of seizure after completion of the assigned regimen in the 24-h group (n = 5, 0.9%) versus the 12-h group (n = 2, 0.3%), P = 0.29; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08, 2.04), or in occurrence of seizure any time after enrollment (n = 9, 1.5% vs. n = 5, 0.9%, P = 0.28, RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.19-1.64). Participants in the 12-h group had a shorter duration of inpatient admission (9.4 ± 8.8 vs. 7.7 ± 6.5 days, P = 0.0009) and urethral catheterization (2.1 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.3 days, P < 0.0001). Rates of side effects from magnesium sulfate were lower in the 12-h group: pain at the injection site (94.8% (n = 548) vs. 91.5% (n = 540), P = 0.03), inflammation (62.2% (n = 358) vs. 40.0% (n = 237), P < 0.0001), and bleeding or bruising at the injection site (25.1% (n = 144) vs. 14.4% (n = 85), P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 24 h, 12 h of intramuscular magnesium sulfate showed similar rates of seizures, with fewer side effects and shorter inpatient admission. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective registration was with Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR201811515303983): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=4690.

Levetiracetam Prophylaxis for Children Admitted With Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) for pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) are understudied. We evaluated clinical and radiographic features that inform prescription of ASMs for pediatric TBI. We hypothesized that despite a lack of evidence, levetiracetam is the preferred prophylactic ASM but that prophylaxis is inconsistently prescribed. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed children admitted with TBI from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. TBI severity was defined using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Two independent neuroradiologists reviewed initial head computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Fisher exact tests and descriptive and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Among 167 children with TBI, 44 (26%) received ASM prophylaxis. All 44 (100%) received levetiracetam. Prophylaxis was more commonly prescribed for younger children, those with neurosurgical intervention, and abnormal neuroimaging (particularly intraparenchymal hematoma) (odds ratio = 10.3, confidence interval 1.8 to 58.9), or GCS ≤12. Six children (13.6%), all on ASM, developed early posttraumatic seizures (EPTSs). Of children with GCS ≤12, four of 17 (23.5%) on levetiracetam prophylaxis developed EPTSs, higher than the reported rate for phenytoin. CONCLUSIONS: Although some studies suggest it may be inferior to phenytoin, levetiracetam was exclusively used for EPTS prophylaxis. Intraparenchymal hematoma >1 cm was the single neuroimaging feature associated with ASM prophylaxis regardless of the GCS score. Yet these trends are not equivalent to optimal evidence-based management. We still observed important variability in neuroimaging characteristics and TBI severity for children on prophylaxis. Thus, further study of ASM prophylaxis and prevention of pediatric EPTSs is warranted.

Phenytoin prophylaxis and functional outcomes following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Seizure activity following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) can worsen patients' comorbidity. However, data regarding whether seizure prophylaxis for sICH is associated with patients' poor functional outcome is inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between phenytoin prophylaxis and poor functional outcome after sICH. METHODS: We conducted our search on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases as of October 30, 2020 for studies that included information on seizure prophylaxis and functional outcome in patients with sICH. Primary outcome was poor functional outcome at the longest follow-up in patients receiving seizure prophylaxis. The secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at 90 days follow-up. We conducted random effects meta-analysis and moderator analyses to detect sources of heterogeneity for our outcomes. RESULTS: We included eleven studies in the final analysis with a total of 4268 patients. A moderator analysis further showed prospective studies had lower heterogeneity. We did not find an association between seizure prophylaxis and poor functional outcome at time of longest follow-up (OR 1.2, 95%CI 0.9-1.6, p-value = 0.22, I2 = 61%), nor at 90-day follow-up (OR 1.4, 95%CI 0.8-2.4, p-value = 0.24, I2 = 78%). CONCLUSION: Seizure prophylaxis following sICH was not associated with worse functional outcomes at longest follow-up or at 90 days. Neither levetiracetam nor phenytoin was associated with outcome in our exploratory meta-regression, though there is a trend towards better outcomes in populations where there was a higher percentage of patients who received levetiracetam. More randomized trials are needed to confirm this observation.

A Comparison of Seizure Prophylaxis: Phenytoin Versus Levetiracetam.

Phenytoin and levetiracetam are both antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) used for seizure prophylaxis. However, to date, there is a paucity of literature comparing their relative efficacies. In this narrative review, we seek to determine if there is greater advantage between the two AEDs, levetiracetam and phenytoin. Phenytoin is the more traditional AED of the two as it has been medically used for a much longer time than levetiracetam. However, levetiracetam, the newer AED of the two, has fewer side effects than phenytoin and fewer drug-drug interactions. Although past studies have aimed to compare the efficacy of phenytoin versus levetiracetam, there is no clear consensus as to if there is a clinical advantage to one over the other. Here, we have analyzed several studies published between 2013 and 2020 in the hopes of having a better understanding of which AED is more efficient in preventing seizures. Many factors can contribute to determining which AED is the better fit for patients, including pricing, risk for adverse drug effects, and level of patient monitoring. After analysis of past research, the more advantageous AED still remains unclear. Future research must be conducted that involve large patient populations, stratifying age populations, and studies analyzing cost-effectiveness to clearly determine if there is indeed a more advantageous AED between levetiracetam and phenytoin.