Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Viruses ; 14(9)2022 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36146748

ABSTRACT

The Common Specifications/EU 2017/746 regulation for market approval of class D in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs) intended for detection of blood borne viruses requires testing of the International Standard and 10-30 seroconversion panels to demonstrate 'state of the art' assay performance. We examined whether these requirements for performance evaluation are reasonable for HBV-DNA and HBsAg assays. For this purpose, we quantified HBsAg and HBV-DNA (genotype A) in the ramp-up phase of five seroconversion panels and demonstrated a remarkably parallel increase in the Log concentration of both analytes over time. Testing of seroconversion panels by three nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) methods in multiple replicates and probit analysis with sufficient critical samples from all five panels taken together showed detection limits in copies/mL that were comparable to those on a HBV-DNA genotype A standard dilution panel. This indicates that the viral doubling time in the ramp-up phase is equal above and below the quantification limit of the viral load assay. The geometric mean HBsAg (PRISM) cutoff crossing point was 20 days later than the 50% NAT (Ultrio Plus) conversion point equivalent to 1500 (range: 1100-2200) and 4.8 (CI: 3.7-6.4) HBV-DNA copies/mL, respectively. Analytical sensitivity data of different NAT assay versions obtained over a decade demonstrated that the detection limit on the International Standard is not representative of all genotyped reference samples. From our detailed mathematical analysis, we conclude that HBV-DNA and HBsAg standard dilution series are functionally equivalent to seroconversion panels. A general requirement of a 95% detection limit ≤100 HBV-DNA copies/mL for different viral genotypes would be a better-defined regulation for EU market approval of NAT blood screening assays than the testing of multiple seroconversion panels to claim 'state of the art' performance.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens , Hepatitis B , Antigens, Surface , Blood Donors , DNA, Viral/analysis , Hepatitis B virus/genetics , Humans , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Viremia/diagnosis
2.
Vaccine ; 40(22): 2993-2998, 2022 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443917

ABSTRACT

Seroconversion panels are an important tool for investigating antibody responses in acute and chronic phases of disease and development of serological assays for viral diseases including COVID-19. Globally it is anticipated that vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 will facilitate control of the current pandemic. The two COVID-19 seroconversion panels analyzed in this study were obtained from healthcare workers with samples collected before vaccination with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) and after the first and second doses of the vaccine. Panel samples were tested for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (IgG). Individual subjects with a positive response for anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG in their pre-vaccination samples showed a significantly enhanced response to the first vaccination. In older subjects, lower immunological responses to the first injection were observed, which were overcome by the second injection. All subjects in the study were positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG after the second dose of vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Aged , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Seroconversion , Vaccination
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 100(2): 115340, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596485

ABSTRACT

Seroconversion panels are an important tool for investigating antibody responses and developing serological assays. A seroconversion panel was generated from a single SARS-CoV-2 positive plasma donor over 87 days. This seroconversion panel was tested against 6 SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests (IgG, IgM, and total Ig). All test kits utilized recombinant antigens that are specific to SARS-CoV-2. The seroconversion panel showed IgG responses for SARS-CoV-2 after day 50. IgM levels peaked on day 50 (prior to IgG) and declined in subsequent samples. This seroconversion panel is a useful tool for validation of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serological Testing/methods , COVID-19/immunology , Seroconversion , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Convalescence , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2/immunology
4.
Biores Open Access ; 9(1): 243-246, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33269113

ABSTRACT

The use of high concentrations of biotin as a dietary supplement to improve hair, skin, and nail quality has increased in the United States over the past few years. High concentrations of biotin have been shown to interfere with some diagnostic assays that use streptavidin-biotin interactions as one of the steps in the assay. The objective of this report is to evaluate potential biotin interference on the analytical and clinical sensitivity of a point of care (POC) antigen-antibody combo HIV-1 assay. We spiked biotin at concentrations ranging from 12.5 to 400 ng/mL into serum and plasma containing HIV-1 subtype B p24 antigen derived from culture supernatant. The p24 antigen was present in the matrices at 30 pg/mL. Fifty microliters of each sample was applied to Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combo assay strips in duplicate and results were read by eye after 20 to 30 min. Biotin interfered with detection of HIV-1 p24 in serum and plasma. HIV-1 p24 was not detected at 30 pg/mL p24 when biotin was present at 200 ng/mL concentration. Our study demonstrated that elevated levels of biotin in samples may interfere with POC assays. It is important to consider biotin supplements as potential sources of falsely increased or decreased test results, especially in cases wherein supplementation cannot be ruled out.

5.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-419933

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the quality of four domestic and three imported fourth-generation HIV diagnostic reagents.Methods The specificity and sensitivity of these assays were analyzed when testing HIV negative samples and HIV-1 RNA positive samples.The relative seroconversion sensitivity index was analyzed when testing BBI seroconversion panels.Results The sensitivity of seven 4th-generation assays were 100% (95% CI:99.86%-100% ),and one sample at the window period of HIV-1 infection were detected as positive.Of the seven assays,one imported assay exhibited the relative largeδ + value (1.0892),and the small δ+ value were found on the remaining six assays (0.0836-0.3003 ).For the samples negative for HIV antibody,varying degrees of false positives were observed on the seven assays ( specificity:97.80% -99.60%,δ- value:-1.3803 to -0.4778).When testing the BBI seroconversion panels,the relative seroconversion sensitivity index of domestic assays were -0.500-0,however,which of imported assays were -0.600 and -0.700.Conclusion The seven reagents exhibited high sensitivity and specificity.The 4th generation HIV assays can be used as blood screening reagents to find the samples at window period of HIV-1 infection,thus indicating the certain meaning in reducing the transmission risk of HIV-1 for fourth-generation HIV diagnostic reagents.However,the better efficiency to detect HIV-1 early infection was observed on the imported assays than on the domestic assays.

6.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-381684

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the differences between the third and the fourth generations of anti-HIV assays,and different kits within the same generation.Methods A total of 989 HIV-negative samples,185 samples positive for HIV-1 RNA.1st-generation international references of HIV antibodies and samples from 9 sets of BBI seroconversion panels were detected by 8 kits of the third generation and 4 kits of the fourth.Results The fourth generation kits can detect HIV infection earlier than the third generation kits.However,the detected days of HIV infection with different kits of the fourth generation were different whilst no significant difierences were found with difierent kits of the third generation.Furthermore,the capacity of detecting samples with different genotypes for different reagents was different,especially the capacity of domestic reagents on detecting HIV-1 O group and HIV-2 samples was relatively weak.Conclusion These data provided information to improve the quality of anti-HIV diagnostic reagents further.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...