The effect of a single session of psychological first aid in the emergency department on PTSD and depressive symptoms three months post-intervention: results of a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Despite its popularity, evidence of the effectiveness of Psychological First Aid (PFA) is scarce.Objective: To assess whether PFA, compared to psychoeducation (PsyEd), an attention placebo control, reduces PTSD and depressive symptoms three months post-intervention.Methods: In two emergency departments, 166 recent-trauma adult survivors were randomised to a single session of PFA (n = 78) (active listening, breathing retraining, categorisation of needs, assisted referral to social networks, and PsyEd) or stand-alone PsyEd (n = 88). PTSD and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline (T0), one (T1), and three months post-intervention (T2) with the PTSD Checklist (PCL-C at T0 and PCL-S at T1/T2) and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Self-reported side effects, post-trauma increased alcohol/substance consumption and interpersonal conflicts, and use of psychotropics, psychotherapy, sick leave, and complementary/alternative medicine were also explored.Results: 86 participants (51.81% of those randomised) dropped out at T2. A significant proportion of participants in the PsyEd group also received PFA components (i.e. contamination). From T0 to T2, we did not find a significant advantage of PFA in reducing PTSD (p = .148) or depressive symptoms (p = .201). However, we found a significant dose-response effect between the number of delivered components, session duration, and PTSD symptom reduction. No significant difference in self-reported adverse effects was found. At T2, a smaller proportion of participants assigned to PFA reported increased consumption of alcohol/substances (OR = 0.09, p = .003), interpersonal conflicts (OR = 0.27, p = .014), and having used psychotropics (OR = 0.23, p = .013) or sick leave (OR = 0.11, p = .047).Conclusions: Three months post-intervention, we did not find evidence that PFA outperforms PsyEd in reducing PTSD or depressive symptoms. Contamination may have affected our results. PFA, nonetheless, appears to be promising in modifying some post-trauma behaviours. Further research is needed.

Psychological First Aid (PFA) is widely recommended early after trauma.We assessed PFA's effectiveness for decreasing PTSD symptoms and other problems 3 months post-trauma.We didn't find definitive evidence of PFA's effectiveness. Still, it seems to be a safe intervention.

Impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To know the impact of a geriatric intervention based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) on avoidable admissions in older patients at risk evaluated in the Emergency Department. METHOD: Prospective observational unicenter study. We included patients, from October 1, 2018 to January 31, 2020, over 75 years who were attended at the Emergency Department with a Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST) score≥2. All patients were evaluated by a geriatrician through the CGA. The reasons for going to the Emergency room were collected and also the main intervention carried out by Geriatrics, whether admission or discharge was indicated and whether the admission was avoidable. We did a cost analysis calculating this by (bed/day×average stay×number of admissions avoided). RESULTS: We included 260 patients, 66% were women and the mean age was 86 years. 73.5% patients had polypharmacy, the mean Charlson index was 2.5 (5.6). 63.3% were independent for walking and 20.8% independent for basic activities of daily living. 59% had cognitive impairment. 91.5% lived at home. The most frequent reason for visiting the Emergency room was decline of general state in 22% and the most frequent intervention carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in the decision making process in 35.4% followed by referral to a preferential outpatient geriatric care circuit in 32.7%. Other interventions carried out by Geriatrics was assistance in clarifying diagnosis (4.2%), assistance in pharmacological adjustment (8.5%), referral to a standard geriatric care pathway (13.1%), telephone follow-up (4.2%) and/or coordination with Social Services for care planning (11.2%). Including all patients, 29.2% required hospital admission and 70.8% were discharged. 40% admissions were avoided, which meant more than 540 thousand euros saved. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized CGA coordinated by Geriatrics in older patients at risk of suffering adverse events in the Emergency room reduces admissions and costs, so it should therefore be established as a recommendation of good clinical practice.

Restrictive calcium replacement in septic shock: a multicenter before-after intervention study. / Reposición restrictiva de calcio en pacientes con shock séptico: estudio de intervención antes-después.

OBJECTIVES: To study the impact of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in comparison with a liberal one in patients with septic shock. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective before-after study that estimated the impact of implementing a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit between May 2019 and April 2021 were assigned to liberal calcium replacement, and those admitted between May 2021 and April 2022 were assigned to a restrictive protocol. The primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality. Patients were matched with propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 644 patients were included; liberal replacement was used in 453 patients and the restrictive replacement in 191. We paired 553 patients according to propensity scores, 386 in the liberal group and 167 in the restrictive group. Mortality did not differ significantly between the groups at 28 days (35.3% vs 32.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.29) or after resolution of septic shock (81.5% vs 83.8%; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09). Nor did scores on the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scale differ (2.1 vs 2.6; P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock was not associated with a decrease in 28-day mortality in comparison with use of a liberal protocol. However, we were able to reduce calcium replacement without adverse effects.

OBJETIVO: Investigar el efecto de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio frente a una estrategia liberal en pacientes con shock séptico. METODO: Estudio multicéntrico, antes-después y retrospectivo que evaluó el efecto de la implementación de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio en pacientes con shock séptico. Los pacientes que ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) entre mayo de 2019 y abril de 2021 se asignaron al grupo con administración liberal, y los que se presentaron entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 ­tras la implementación del protocolo­ al grupo con administración restrictiva. La variable de resultado principal fue la mortalidad a 28 días. Se realizó un emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 644 pacientes, 453 en el grupo liberal y 191 en el grupo restrictivo. De los que 553 se emparejaron (386 en el grupo liberal, y 167 en el grupo restrictivo). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en la mortalidad a los 28 días (35,3% vs 32,3%; HR: 0,97; IC 95%: 0,72-1,29), en la finalización del shock (81,5% vs a 83,8%; HR: 0,89; IC 95%: 0,73-1,09) ni en la puntuación de la escala SOFA (2,1 vs 2,6; p = 0,20). CONCLUSIONES: La implementación de un protocolo de administración restrictiva de calcio, en pacientes con shock séptico, no se asoció a una disminución de la mortalidad a los 28 días en comparación con una administración liberal. No obstante, la reposición de calcio podría reducirse sin efectos adversos.

Mortality after emergency department discharge: an analysis of 453599 cases. / Mortalidad tras el alta desde el servicio de urgencias hospitalario: análisis de 453.599 episodios.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify and analyze mortality in patients who die within 30 days of discharge home from a hospital emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients older than 14 years of age who were discharged home from the ED of a tertiary care hospital over a 5-year period were included. We collected age, sex, and other demographic variables, as well as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The outcome variables of interest were 7-day and 30-day mortality and cause of death. Deaths were classified as expected and directly related to the emergency, expected but not directly related, unexpected and directly related, and unexpected and not directly related. A death was classified as an adverse event if it was directly related to a problem of diagnosis or management in the ED, underestimation of severity, or complications of a procedure. RESULTS: Of 519312 patients attended in the ED, 453 599 were discharged home. Of those discharged, 148 died at home within 7 days (32.63 deaths/100 000 discharges) and 355 died within 30 days (78.48 deaths/100 000 discharges). One hundred thirteen deaths (31.8%) were expected and related to the emergency 24.91/100 000), 169 (47.6%) were expected but unrelated 37.26/100 000), 4 (1.1%) were unexpected and related 1.10/100000), and 69 (19.4%) were unexpected and unrelated 15.21/100000). Deaths were considered adverse events related to ED care in 24.2% of the cases. Underestimation of severity was responsible for the highest proportion (10.7%) of such deaths. The median age of patients who died was 83 years, and the median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 6. The most common cause of death was a malignant tumor (23.0%), followed by congestive heart failure (20.2%) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (13.2%). Unexpected deaths related to ED care were significantly related to a higher proportion of adverse events related to diagnosis (P = .001), management (P = .004), and underestimation of severity (P .001). CONCLUSION: Early deaths after discharge home from a hospital ED occured in patients of advanced age with concomitant conditions. The main clinical settings were neoplastic and cardiovascular disease. Seven-day and 30-day mortality rates directly related to the emergency visit were low. Adverse events related to ED care played a role in about a quarter of the deaths after discharge.

OBJETIVO: Cuantificar y analizar la mortalidad de los pacientes dados de alta directamente desde un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) y que fallecen dentro de los primeros 30 días en el domicilio. METODO: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes mayores de 14 años dados de alta desde el SUH a domicilio durante 5 años en un hospital terciario. Se recogieron como variables demográficas, edad, sexo e índice de Charlson. Como variable evolutiva se investigó la mortalidad a 30 días, y si esta ocurrió en 7 o menos días o más de 7 días y la causa del fallecimiento. La mortalidad se clasificó como esperada y directamente relacionada, esperada y no directamente relacionada, no esperada y directamente relacionad, y no esperada y no directamente relacionada. Se determinó como evento adverso (EA) relacionada con la mortalidad si la muerte estaba relacionada con un problema diagnóstico o de manejo, de infraestimación de la gravedad o complicaciones del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Fueron atendidos 519.312 episodios de los que 453.599 fueron dados de alta al domicilio. De estos, 148 fallecieron en domicilio a los 7 días (32,63/100.000 altas) y 355 fallecieron en los 30 días después del alta (78,48/100.000 altas): el 31,8% (n = 113) fueron fallecimientos esperados y relacionados (24,91/100.000 altas), el 47,6% (n = 169) esperados y no relacionados (37,26/100.000 altas), el 1,1% (n = 4) no esperados y relacionados (1,10/100.000 altas) y 19,4% (n = 69) no esperados y no relacionados (15,21/100.000 altas). En un 24,2% de los pacientes se detectaron EA relacionados con la asistencia en urgencias, el más frecuente EA fue la infraestimación de la gravedad (10,7%). La mediana de edad de los pacientes fallecidos era de 83 años y una mediana del índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICC) de 6 puntos. La principal etiología de fallecimiento fue la neoplasia maligna (23,0%), seguida de insuficiencia cardiaca congestiva (20,2%) y enfermedad cardiaca arteriosclerótica (13,2%). En los fallecimientos no esperados y relacionados, destaca una mayor proporción de EA por causa de problemas diagnósticos (p = 0,015), de manejo (p = 0,028) y de infraestimación de la gravedad (p = 0,004). CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes que fallecen de forma precoz tras el alta de SUH en el domicilio son ancianos con comorbilidad y donde las principales causas de muerte son las enfermedades neoplásicas y las enfermedades cardiacas. Las muertes no esperadas y directamente relacionadas son poco frecuentes a los 7 y 30 días del alta. En una cuarta parte de los pacientes se detectaron EA relacionados con la asistencia en urgencias.

Evaluation of a HIV screening strategy in the hospital setting to reduce undiagnosed infection.

INTRODUCTION: In Spain, half of new HIV diagnoses are late and a significant proportion of people living with HIV have not yet been diagnosed. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an automated opportunistic HIV screening strategy in the hospital setting. METHODS: Between April 2022 and September 2023, HIV testing was performed on all patients in whom a hospital admission analytical profile, a pre-surgical profile and several pre-designed serological profiles (fever of unknown origin, pneumonia, mononucleosis, hepatitis, infection of sexual transmission, rash, endocarditis and myopericarditis) was requested. A circuit was started to refer patients the specialists. RESULTS: 6407 HIV tests included in the profiles were performed and 18 (0.3%) new cases were diagnosed (26.4% of diagnoses in the health area). Five patients were diagnosed by hospital admission and pre-surgery profile and 13 by a serological profile requested for indicator entities (fever of unknown origin, sexually transmitted infection, mononucleosis) or possibly associated (pneumonia) with HIV occult infection. Recent infection was documented in 5 (27.8%) patients and late diagnosis in 9 (50.0%), of whom 5 (55.5%) had previously missed the opportunity to be diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: This opportunistic screening was profitable since the positive rate of 0.3% is cost-effective and allowed a quarter of new diagnoses to be made, so it seems a good strategy that contributes to reducing hidden infection and late diagnosis.

Grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad según el sexo del paciente en las intoxicaciones agudas en urgencias / Adherence to quality indicators for emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to patient sex

Objetivos. Estudiar las diferencias dependiendo del sexo en la atención de pacientes con intoxicaciones agudas en urgencias y en el grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad (IC). Método. Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, que incluyó todos los casos de intoxicación aguda de pacientes mayores de 14 años atendidos en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario durante 4 años. Se analizaron variables demográficas, tipo de tóxicos y causa de la intoxicación, el grado de cumplimiento de los IC y destino al alta. Resultados. Se registraron 1.144 casos, un 62,1% (n = 710) eran mujeres. Las mujeres tuvieron mayor número de intoxicaciones voluntarias (52,3% vs 41,4%; p < 0,001) y menos de manera accidental (24,9% vs 30,3%; p = 0,047). Los fármacos más frecuentes en mujeres fueron las benzodiacepinas (49,6% vs 41,2%; p = 0,007), y las intoxicaciones por drogas de abuso y alcohol fueron menores que en hombres. Hubo un alto grado de cumplimiento en la mayoría de los IC (> 85%) en ambos sexos. Conclusiones. El perfil epidemiológico de la intoxicación aguda en mujeres es diferente al de los hombres. En general se puede considerar como óptimo el cumplimiento de los IC en urgencias. No existen diferencias cualitativas en la asistencia del paciente intoxicado con respecto a su sexo. (AU)

Objective. To study differences in the emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to biological sex of patients and to assess adherence to care quality indicators. Methods. Retrospective observational study including all cases of acute poisoning diagnosed in patients over the age of 14 years treated in a tertiary care hospital emergency department over a period of 4 years. We analyzed demographic variables, substance type and reason for acute poisoning, degree of adherence to quality indicators, and discharge destination. Results. A total of 1144 cases were included; 710 patients (62.1%) were female and 434 (37.9%) were male. The proportion of deliberate self-poisoning was higher in females (52.3% vs 41.4% in males; P < .001); unintentional poisoning was less frequent in females (in 24.9% vs in 30.3% of males; P = .047). Benzodiazepine poisoning was more frequent in females (in 49.6% vs 41.2%; P = .007). Street drug and alcohol poisoning was less common in females. Adherence to quality indicators was high (> 85%) for both sexes. Conclusions. The epidemiologic profile of poisoning is different in females and males. General emergency department adherence to quality indicators can be considered optimal. We detected no qualitative sex-related differences in the care of patients with acute poisoning. (AU)

Adherence to quality indicators for emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to patient sex. / Grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad según el sexo del paciente en las intoxicaciones agudas en urgencias.

OBJECTIVES: To study differences in the emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to biological sex of patients and to assess adherence to care quality indicators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study including all cases of acute poisoning diagnosed in patients over the age of 14 years treated in a tertiary care hospital emergency department over a period of 4 years. We analyzed demographic variables, substance type and reason for acute poisoning, degree of adherence to quality indicators, and discharge destination. RESULTS: A total of 1144 cases were included; 710 patients (62.1%) were female and 434 (37.9%) were male. The proportion of deliberate self-poisoning was higher in females (52.3% vs 41.4% in males; P .001); unintentional poisoning was less frequent in females (in 24.9% vs in 30.3% of males; P = .047). Benzodiazepine poisoning was more frequent in females (in 49.6% vs 41.2%; P = .007). Street drug and alcohol poisoning was less common in females. Adherence to quality indicators was high (> 85%) for both sexes. CONCLUSION: The epidemiologic profile of poisoning is different in females and males. General emergency department adherence to quality indicators can be considered optimal. We detected no qualitative sex-related differences in the care of patients with acute poisoning.

OBJETIVO: Estudiar las diferencias dependiendo del sexo en la atención de pacientes con intoxicaciones agudas en urgencias y en el grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad (IC). METODO: Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, que incluyó todos los casos de intoxicación aguda de pacientes mayores de 14 años atendidos en el servicio de urgencias de un hospital terciario durante 4 años. Se analizaron variables demográficas, tipo de tóxicos y causa de la intoxicación, el grado de cumplimiento de los IC y destino al alta. RESULTADOS: Se registraron 1.144 casos, un 62,1% (n = 710) eran mujeres. Las mujeres tuvieron mayor número de intoxicaciones voluntarias (52,3% vs 41,4%; p 0,001) y menos de manera accidental (24,9% vs 30,3%; p = 0,047). Los fármacos más frecuentes en mujeres fueron las benzodiacepinas (49,6% vs 41,2%; p = 0,007), y las intoxicaciones por drogas de abuso y alcohol fueron menores que en hombres. Hubo un alto grado de cumplimiento en la mayoría de los IC (> 85%) en ambos sexos. CONCLUSIONES: El perfil epidemiológico de la intoxicación aguda en mujeres es diferente al de los hombres. En general se puede considerar como óptimo el cumplimiento de los IC en urgencias. No existen diferencias cualitativas en la asistencia del paciente intoxicado con respecto a su sexo.

Evaluation of FebriDx® for the management of children with acute febrile respiratory infection.

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are a common cause of inappropriate antibiotic prescription (ATB) in pediatrics. FebriDx® is a rapid diagnostic test that differentiates between viral and bacterial infections. The objective is to analyse the impact of FebriDx® on ATB prescription when managing febrile ARI. METHODS: Prospective study carried out in patients aged 1-<18 years with febrile ARI in the emergency department. FebriDx® was performed and the impact on management was evaluated at follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 216 patients were included. Clinical assessment and FebriDx® result coincided coincided in 174 (80.5%) cases. A modification of the initial therapeutic plan was made in 22 (52.4%) of the 42 discordant ones (10.2% of the overall patients). In pneumonia the impact was 34.5%; in all cases it involved not prescribing ATB. CONCLUSIONS: FebriDx® could be a useful tool in the management of pediatric patients with febrile ARI to optimize ATB prescription.

Association between socioeconomic status and hospitalisation requirement in older patients attended at the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: A low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with poor health results. The present study aimed to investigate if SES of older patients attending the emergency department is associated with the use of healthcare resources and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study including consecutive patients 65 years or older admitted to the emergency department. Variables at baseline, index episode, and follow-up were recorded. SES was measured using an indirect theoretical index and patients were categorised into two groups according to whether they lived in a neighbourhood with a low or high SES. Primary outcomes included hospitalisation after the emergency department visit and prolonged hospitalisation (>7 days) at index episode. Secondary outcomes included emergency department re-consultant and hospital admission in the following 3 months after the index episode, and all-cause mortality after long-term follow-up. Logistic regression and cumulative hazards regression models were used to investigate associations between SES and outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 553 patients (80 years [73-85], 50.5% female, 55.9% with low SES). After the emergency department visit, 234 patients (42.3%) required hospital admission. A low SES was inversely associated with hospitalisation with an adjusted odds ratio=0.654 (95% CI 0.441-0.970). Among hospitalised patients, a low SES was associated with prolonged hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio=2.739; 95% CI 1.470-5.104). Follow-up outcomes, including all-cause mortality, were not associated with SES. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients living in more deprived urban areas were hospitalised less often after emergency department care, but hospital stays were longer. Understanding the effect of social determinants in healthcare use is mandatory to tailor resources to patient needs.

Usefulness of combining inflammatory biomarkers and clinical scales in an emergency department to stratify risk in patients with infections. / Utilidad de la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria y escalas clínicas para la estratificación del riesgo en pacientes atendidos en urgencias por sospecha de infección.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether combining biomarkers of inflammatory response and clinical scales can improve risk stratification of patients with suspected infection in a hospital emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of ED patients treated for infections. We collected the following information on arrival: demographic and baseline clinical data, comorbidities, the focus of infection, and values for the following inflammatory biomarkers: leukocyte counts, and C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations. Scores on the following clinical scales were recorded based on the variables gathered: the SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) criteria, the qSOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), and the NEWS (National Early Warning Score). The main outcome was a composite measure that included 30-day death or need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: A total of 473 patients with a mean (SD) age of 70.3 (19.2) years were included. The majority were men (257, 54.3%). Thirty-one (6.6%) died within 30 days and 16 (3.4%) were admitted to the ICU. The composite outcome (death or ICU admission) occurred in 45 patients (9.5%). The MR-proADM concentration, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.739 (95% CI, 0671-0.809) was a better predictor than the other biomarkers or clinical scales, although the differences between MR-proADM and either lactate concentration or the NEWS were not significant in the comparisons (P = .064). Combining the MR-proADM concentration with any of the scales did not significantly improve risk prediction. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification of patients with infection is a key part of ED decision-making. MR-proADM concentration is superior to other biomarkers and clinical prediction scales for predicting short-term prognosis in the ED. Combining MR-proADM measurement with other scales or measures does not improve the yield.

OBJETIVO: Investigar si la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria (BMRI) y escalas clínicas mejora la estratificación pronóstica de pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) por sospecha de infección. METODO: Estudio analítico, observacional y prospectivo que incluyó pacientes con sospecha de infección atendidos en un SUH. Se recogieron variables demográficas, comorbilidades, datos clínicos a la llegada al SUH, foco de infección y los siguientes BMRI: leucocitos, proteína C reactiva, procalcitonina, lactato y región medial de la proadrenomodulina (MR-proADM). Se calcularon los valores de las escalas SIRS (síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica), qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) y NEWS (National Early Warning Score). La variable de resultado principal fue una compuesta que incluía mortalidad a 30 días o necesidad de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 473 pacientes, con una edad media de 70 (DE 19) años y el 54,3% (257). Hubo 31 fallecimientos (6,6%) y 16 (3,4%) ingresos en UCI. La variable de resultado se produjo en 45 (9,5%) pacientes. La MR-proADM mostró la mejor área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC-COR) en comparación con el resto de biomarcadores y escalas clínicas [0,739 (IC 95% 0,671-0,809)], aunque sin diferencias respecto a lactato (p = 0,144) ni a la escala NEWS (p = 0,064). Al combinar MR-proADM con los diferentes biomarcadores y escalas clínicas, no se obtuvo ninguna combinación que mejore significativamente la precisión pronóstica individual del MR-proADM. CONCLUSIONES: La estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes con infección es una cuestión clave para la toma de decisiones en los SUH. La determinación de MR-proADM supera a otros BMRI y escalas clínicas para la estratificación pronóstica de los pacientes a corto plazo en los SUH. La combinación con otros biomarcadores o escalas clínicas no mejora su capacidad pronóstica.

Utilidad de la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria y escalas clínicas para la estratificación del riesgo en pacientes atendidos en urgencias por sospecha de infección / Usefulness of combining inflammatory biomarkers and clinical scales in an emergency department to stratify risk in patients with infections

Objetivo. Investigar si la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria (BMRI) y escalas clínicas mejora la estratificación pronóstica de pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) por sospecha de infección. Método. Estudio analítico, observacional y prospectivo que incluyó pacientes con sospecha de infección atendidos en un SUH. Se recogieron variables demográficas, comorbilidades, datos clínicos a la llegada al SUH, foco de infección y los siguientes BMRI: leucocitos, proteína C reactiva, procalcitonina, lactato y región medial de la proadrenomodulina (MR-proADM). Se calcularon los valores de las escalas SIRS (síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica), qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) y NEWS (National Early Warning Score). La variable de resultado principal fue una compuesta que incluía mortalidad a 30 días o necesidad de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Resultados. Se incluyeron 473 pacientes, con una edad media de 70 (DE 19) años y el 54,3% (257). Hubo 31 fallecimientos (6,6%) y 16 (3,4%) ingresos en UCI. La variable de resultado se produjo en 45 (9,5%) pacientes. La MR-proADM mostró la mejor área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC-COR) en comparación con el resto de biomarcadores y escalas clínicas [0,739 (IC 95% 0,671-0,809)], aunque sin diferencias respecto a lactato (p = 0,144) ni a la escala NEWS (p = 0,064). Al combinar MR-proADM con los diferentes biomarcadores y escalas clínicas, no se obtuvo ninguna combinación que mejore significativamente la precisión pronóstica individual del MR-proADM. Conclusiones. La estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes con infección es una cuestión clave para la toma de decisiones en los SUH. La determinación de MR-proADM supera a otros BMRI y escalas clínicas para la estratificación pronóstica de los pacientes a corto plazo en los SUH... (AU)

Objective. To determine whether combining biomarkers of inflammatory response and clinical scales can improve risk stratification of patients with suspected infection in a hospital emergency department (ED). Methods. Prospective observational study of ED patients treated for infections. We collected the following information on arrival: demographic and baseline clinical data, comorbidities, the focus of infection, and values for the following inflammatory biomarkers: leukocyte counts, and C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations. Scores on the following clinical scales were recorded based on the variables gathered: the SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) criteria, the qSOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), and the NEWS (National Early Warning Score). The main outcome was a composite measure that included 30-day death or need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results. A total of 473 patients with a mean (SD) age of 70.3 (19.2) years were included. The majority were men (257, 54.3%). Thirty-one (6.6%) died within 30 days and 16 (3.4%) were admitted to the ICU. The composite outcome (death or ICU admission) occurred in 45 patients (9.5%). The MR-proADM concentration, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.739 (95% CI, 0671-0.809) was a better predictor than the other biomarkers or clinical scales, although the differences between MR-proADM and either lactate concentration or the NEWS were not significant in the comparisons (P = .064). Combining the MR-proADM concentration with any of the scales did not significantly improve risk prediction. Conclusions. Risk stratification of patients with infection is a key part of ED decision-making. MR-proADM concentration is superior to other biomarkers and clinical prediction scales for predicting short-term prognosis in the ED... (AU)

Cribado oportunista del virus de la hepatitis C en un servicio de urgencias en Almería, España / Opportunistic screening for hepatitis C virus infection in an emergency department in Almeria, Spain

Objetivo. Se estima que la prevalencia de infección activa por el virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) en España es de un 0,2%, pero un gran número de personas desconocen su estado de infección. Por ello, se requiere aumentar las estrategias de diagnóstico precoz dirigidas a población vulnerable y con escaso vínculo con el sistema sanitario. El objetivo es evaluar el impacto de un programa de cribado oportunista del VHC en los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias (SU) de un hospital universitario. Método. Se realizó un cribado oportunista entre agosto de 2021 y abril de 2023 a los pacientes de 18 a 69 años atendidos en el SU que no se habían realizado la prueba del VHC el año anterior, y que requerían un análisis de sangre dentro de la práctica clínica habitual por cualquier motivo. Resultados. Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 110.267 pacientes en el SU, fueron candidatos a realizar el cribado 22.712 (20,6%), y finalmente se realizó una serología frente al VHC a 11.368 pacientes (50,1%). Se identificaron 43 casos (0,4% de los test efectuados) de infección activa por VHC (viremia), de los cuales, 24 (56%) desconocían previamente su estado. La media de edad del total de pacientes virémicos fue de 57 (DE: 6 años), 34 (79,1%) eran hombres y 5 (11,6%) tenían nacionalidades distintas a la española. No se identificaron factores de riesgo relacionados con la infección por VHC en 22 (51,2%) de los pacientes, y 41 (95,3%) habían tenido oportunidades de diagnóstico en visitas previas al sistema de salud. De los 18 pacientes analizados mediante elastografía transitoria, 7 (38,8%) presentaban cirrosis en el momento del diagnóstico. Se logró vincular a la atención médica posterior a 33 (77%) de los pacientes con infección activa. Conclusiones. Las tasas de infección activa por VHC detectadas en el programa de cribado fueron más altas que la prevalencia estimada en la población general... (AU)

Background and objective. The prevalence of active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Spain is estimated to be 0.2%, but a large number of persons are unaware of their infection status. Additional approaches to early diagnosis of HCV infection in vulnerable populations with scarce contact with the national health care system are therefore needed. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an opportunistic screening program to detect HCV-infected patients attended in our university hospital emergency department (ED). Methods. Opportunistic screening was implemented from August 2021 to April 2023 in ED patients aged 18 to 69 years. The test was ordered if HCV screening had not been done in the last year and blood extraction for testing was indicated for any reason as part of routine ED care. Results. A total of 110 267 patients were seen; 22 712 of them (20.6%) were eligible for screening. Serology for HCV was done for 11 368 of the eligible patients (50.1%). Forty-three cases (in 0.4% of tested samples) of active HCV infection (viremia) were found. In 24 of these cases (56%) the patients had not been aware that they were infected. Their mean (SD) age was 57 (6) years, 34 (79.1%) were men, and 5 (11.6%) were citizens of countries other than Spain. No risk factors related to HCV infection could be found for 22 of the patients (51.2%), and 41 (95.3%) could have been diagnosed during previous contact with the health care system. Of the 18 patients evaluated by transient elastography (FibroScan), 7 (38.8%) had signs of cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-three of the patients with active infections (77%) were subsequently able to access care. Conclusions. The rate of active HCV infection in the screening program was higher than the prevalence estimated for the general population. Opportunistic screening for HCV during ED visits is useful for increasing the number of diagnoses and should be considered as a tool for eradicating this disease. (AU)

Utilidad de la región medial de la pro-adrenomodulina para la detección de bacteriemia verdadera en pacientes mayores atendidos en urgencias por sospecha de infección / Utility of the medial region of pro-adrenomodulin for the detection of true bacteremia in elderly patients treated in the emergency department for suspected infection

Introducción. La predicción de bacteriemia en urgencias es importante para la toma de decisiones iniciales. La población mayor un reto diagnóstico. El objetivo fue evaluar la capacidad de la región medial de la pro-adrenomodulina (MR-proADM) para identificar bacteriemia verdadera (BV) en pacientes mayores atendidos en tres servicios de urgencias. Metodología. Estudio observacional incluyendo pacientes ≥75 años atendidos por sospecha de infección en los que se extrajo un hemocultivo (HC). Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, comorbilidad, hemodinámicas, analíticas y biomarcadores [MR-proADM, procalcitonina (PCT), proteína C reactiva (PCR) y lactato]. La variable de resultado fue un verdadero positivo en el hemocultivo. Resultados. Se incluyeron 109 pacientes con edad media de 83 (DE 5,5) años. En 22 pacientes (20,2%) se obtuvo un diagnóstico final de BV. Las variables independientes para predecirla fueron PCT (OR13,9; IC95%: 2,702-71,703; p=0,002), MR-proADM (OR4,081; IC95%: 1,026-16,225; p=0,046) y temperatura (OR 2,171; IC95%: 1,109-4,248; p=0,024). Considerando el punto de corte con mayor rendimiento diagnóstico para el MR-proADM (2,13 mg/dl), se obtuvo una sensibilidad (Se) de 73%, una especificidad (E) de 71%, un valor predictivo positivo (VPP) de 39%, un valor predictivo negativo (VPN) de 91%, un coeficiente de verosimilitud positivo (LHR+) de 2,53 y un coeficiente de verosimilitud negativo (LHR-) de 0,38; para PCT (0,76 mg/dl) se obtuvo una Se de 90%, E de 65%, VPP de 40%, VPN de 96%, LHR+ 2,64 y un LHR– de 0,14. Al combinar ambos, se observó una Se de 69%, E de 84%, VPP de 52%, VPN de 91%, LHR+ de 4,24 y un LHR- de 0,38. Conclusión. Niveles elevados de PCT y MR-proADM se asocian a un riesgo incrementado de BV y la combinación de ambos mejora la capacidad para identificar estos pacientes. (AU)

Background. The prediction of bacteremia in the emergency department (ER) is important for initial decision-making. The elderly population is a diagnosis challenge. The objective was to evaluate the accuracy of mid regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) to identify true bacteremia (BV) in elderly patients attended in 3 hospital emergency departments. Methods. Observational study including patients ≥75 years of age or older attended in the ER for suspected infection in whom a blood culture (BC) was extracted. Sociodemographic, comorbidity, hemodynamic and analytical variables, biomarkers [MR-proADM, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactate] and final diagnosis were collected. The primary outcome was a true positive on a blood culture. Results. A total of 109 patients with a mean age of 83 (SD: 5.5) years were included. A final diagnosis of BV was obtained in 22 patients (20.2%). The independent variables to predict it were PCT (OR: 13.9; CI95%: 2.702-71.703; p=0.002), MR-proADM (OR: 4.081; CI95%: 1.026-16.225; p=0.046) and temperature (OR: 2.171; CI95%: 1.109-4.248; p=0.024). Considering the cut-off point for MR-proADM (2.13 mg/dl), a sensitivity (Se) of 73%, specificity (E) of 71%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 39%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91%, a positive likelihood ratio (LHR+) of 2.53 and a negative likelihood ratio (LHR-) of 0.38; for PCT (0.76 mg/dl) a Se of 90%, E of 65%, PPV of 40%, NPV of 96%, LHR+ 2,64 and a LHR- of 0.14 were obtained. When combining both, a Se of 69%, E of 84%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 91%, LHR+ of 4.24 and LHR- of 0.38 were observed. Conclusions. Elevated levels of PCT and MR-proADM were independently associated with an increased risk of BV and the combination of both improves the accuracy to identify these patients. (AU)

Utilidad de la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria y escalas clínicas para la estratificación del riesgo en pacientes atendidos en urgencias por sospecha de infección / Usefulness of combining inflammatory biomarkers and clinical scales in an emergency department to stratify risk in patients with infections

Objetivo. Investigar si la combinación de biomarcadores de respuesta inflamatoria (BMRI) y escalas clínicas mejora la estratificación pronóstica de pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) por sospecha de infección. Método. Estudio analítico, observacional y prospectivo que incluyó pacientes con sospecha de infección atendidos en un SUH. Se recogieron variables demográficas, comorbilidades, datos clínicos a la llegada al SUH, foco de infección y los siguientes BMRI: leucocitos, proteína C reactiva, procalcitonina, lactato y región medial de la proadrenomodulina (MR-proADM). Se calcularon los valores de las escalas SIRS (síndrome de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica), qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) y NEWS (National Early Warning Score). La variable de resultado principal fue una compuesta que incluía mortalidad a 30 días o necesidad de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Resultados. Se incluyeron 473 pacientes, con una edad media de 70 (DE 19) años y el 54,3% (257). Hubo 31 fallecimientos (6,6%) y 16 (3,4%) ingresos en UCI. La variable de resultado se produjo en 45 (9,5%) pacientes. La MR-proADM mostró la mejor área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC-COR) en comparación con el resto de biomarcadores y escalas clínicas [0,739 (IC 95% 0,671-0,809)], aunque sin diferencias respecto a lactato (p = 0,144) ni a la escala NEWS (p = 0,064). Al combinar MR-proADM con los diferentes biomarcadores y escalas clínicas, no se obtuvo ninguna combinación que mejore significativamente la precisión pronóstica individual del MR-proADM. Conclusiones. La estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes con infección es una cuestión clave para la toma de decisiones en los SUH. La determinación de MR-proADM supera a otros BMRI y escalas clínicas para la estratificación pronóstica de los pacientes a corto plazo en los SUH... (AU)

Objective. To determine whether combining biomarkers of inflammatory response and clinical scales can improve risk stratification of patients with suspected infection in a hospital emergency department (ED). Methods. Prospective observational study of ED patients treated for infections. We collected the following information on arrival: demographic and baseline clinical data, comorbidities, the focus of infection, and values for the following inflammatory biomarkers: leukocyte counts, and C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and midregional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) concentrations. Scores on the following clinical scales were recorded based on the variables gathered: the SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) criteria, the qSOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), and the NEWS (National Early Warning Score). The main outcome was a composite measure that included 30-day death or need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results. A total of 473 patients with a mean (SD) age of 70.3 (19.2) years were included. The majority were men (257, 54.3%). Thirty-one (6.6%) died within 30 days and 16 (3.4%) were admitted to the ICU. The composite outcome (death or ICU admission) occurred in 45 patients (9.5%). The MR-proADM concentration, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.739 (95% CI, 0671-0.809) was a better predictor than the other biomarkers or clinical scales, although the differences between MR-proADM and either lactate concentration or the NEWS were not significant in the comparisons (P = .064). Combining the MR-proADM concentration with any of the scales did not significantly improve risk prediction. Conclusions. Risk stratification of patients with infection is a key part of ED decision-making. MR-proADM concentration is superior to other biomarkers and clinical prediction scales for predicting short-term prognosis in the ED... (AU)

Cribado oportunista del virus de la hepatitis C en un servicio de urgencias en Almería, España / Opportunistic screening for hepatitis C virus infection in an emergency department in Almeria, Spain

Objetivo. Se estima que la prevalencia de infección activa por el virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) en España es de un 0,2%, pero un gran número de personas desconocen su estado de infección. Por ello, se requiere aumentar las estrategias de diagnóstico precoz dirigidas a población vulnerable y con escaso vínculo con el sistema sanitario. El objetivo es evaluar el impacto de un programa de cribado oportunista del VHC en los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias (SU) de un hospital universitario. Método. Se realizó un cribado oportunista entre agosto de 2021 y abril de 2023 a los pacientes de 18 a 69 años atendidos en el SU que no se habían realizado la prueba del VHC el año anterior, y que requerían un análisis de sangre dentro de la práctica clínica habitual por cualquier motivo. Resultados. Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 110.267 pacientes en el SU, fueron candidatos a realizar el cribado 22.712 (20,6%), y finalmente se realizó una serología frente al VHC a 11.368 pacientes (50,1%). Se identificaron 43 casos (0,4% de los test efectuados) de infección activa por VHC (viremia), de los cuales, 24 (56%) desconocían previamente su estado. La media de edad del total de pacientes virémicos fue de 57 (DE: 6 años), 34 (79,1%) eran hombres y 5 (11,6%) tenían nacionalidades distintas a la española. No se identificaron factores de riesgo relacionados con la infección por VHC en 22 (51,2%) de los pacientes, y 41 (95,3%) habían tenido oportunidades de diagnóstico en visitas previas al sistema de salud. De los 18 pacientes analizados mediante elastografía transitoria, 7 (38,8%) presentaban cirrosis en el momento del diagnóstico. Se logró vincular a la atención médica posterior a 33 (77%) de los pacientes con infección activa. Conclusiones. Las tasas de infección activa por VHC detectadas en el programa de cribado fueron más altas que la prevalencia estimada en la población general... (AU)

Background and objective. The prevalence of active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Spain is estimated to be 0.2%, but a large number of persons are unaware of their infection status. Additional approaches to early diagnosis of HCV infection in vulnerable populations with scarce contact with the national health care system are therefore needed. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an opportunistic screening program to detect HCV-infected patients attended in our university hospital emergency department (ED). Methods. Opportunistic screening was implemented from August 2021 to April 2023 in ED patients aged 18 to 69 years. The test was ordered if HCV screening had not been done in the last year and blood extraction for testing was indicated for any reason as part of routine ED care. Results. A total of 110 267 patients were seen; 22 712 of them (20.6%) were eligible for screening. Serology for HCV was done for 11 368 of the eligible patients (50.1%). Forty-three cases (in 0.4% of tested samples) of active HCV infection (viremia) were found. In 24 of these cases (56%) the patients had not been aware that they were infected. Their mean (SD) age was 57 (6) years, 34 (79.1%) were men, and 5 (11.6%) were citizens of countries other than Spain. No risk factors related to HCV infection could be found for 22 of the patients (51.2%), and 41 (95.3%) could have been diagnosed during previous contact with the health care system. Of the 18 patients evaluated by transient elastography (FibroScan), 7 (38.8%) had signs of cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-three of the patients with active infections (77%) were subsequently able to access care. Conclusions. The rate of active HCV infection in the screening program was higher than the prevalence estimated for the general population. Opportunistic screening for HCV during ED visits is useful for increasing the number of diagnoses and should be considered as a tool for eradicating this disease. (AU)

Opportunistic screening for hepatitis C virus infection in an emergency department in Almeria, Spain. / Cribado oportunista del virus de la hepatitis C en un servicio de urgencias en Almería, España.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Spain is estimated to be 0.2%, but a large number of persons are unaware of their infection status. Additional approaches to early diagnosis of HCV infection in vulnerable populations with scarce contact with the national health care system are therefore needed. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an opportunistic screening program to detect HCV-infected patients attended in our university hospital emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Opportunistic screening was implemented from August 2021 to April 2023 in ED patients aged 18 to 69 years. The test was ordered if HCV screening had not been done in the last year and blood extraction for testing was indicated for any reason as part of routine ED care. RESULTS: A total of 110 267 patients were seen; 22 712 of them (20.6%) were eligible for screening. Serology for HCV was done for 11 368 of the eligible patients (50.1%). Forty-three cases (in 0.4% of tested samples) of active HCV infection (viremia) were found. In 24 of these cases (56%) the patients had not been aware that they were infected. Their mean (SD) age was 57 (6) years, 34 (79.1%) were men, and 5 (11.6%) were citizens of countries other than Spain. No risk factors related to HCV infection could be found for 22 of the patients (51.2%), and 41 (95.3%) could have been diagnosed during previous contact with the health care system. Of the 18 patients evaluated by transient elastography (FibroScan), 7 (38.8%) had signs of cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis. Thirty-three of the patients with active infections (77%) were subsequently able to access care. CONCLUSION: The rate of active HCV infection in the screening program was higher than the prevalence estimated for the general population. Opportunistic screening for HCV during ED visits is useful for increasing the number of diagnoses and should be considered as a tool for eradicating this disease.

OBJETIVO: Se estima que la prevalencia de infección activa por el virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) en España es de un 0,2%, pero un gran número de personas desconocen su estado de infección. Por ello, se requiere aumentar las estrategias de diagnóstico precoz dirigidas a población vulnerable y con escaso vínculo con el sistema sanitario. El objetivo es evaluar el impacto de un programa de cribado oportunista del VHC en los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias (SU) de un hospital universitario. METODO: Se realizó un cribado oportunista entre agosto de 2021 y abril de 2023 a los pacientes de 18 a 69 años atendidos en el SU que no se habían realizado la prueba del VHC el año anterior, y que requerían un análisis de sangre dentro de la práctica clínica habitual por cualquier motivo. RESULTADOS: Durante el periodo de estudio se atendieron 110.267 pacientes en el SU, fueron candidatos a realizar el cribado 22.712 (20,6%), y finalmente se realizó una serología frente al VHC a 11.368 pacientes (50,1%). Se identificaron 43 casos (0,4% de los test efectuados) de infección activa por VHC (viremia), de los cuales, 24 (56%) desconocían previamente su estado. La media de edad del total de pacientes virémicos fue de 57 (DE: 6 años), 34 (79,1%) eran hombres y 5 (11,6%) tenían nacionalidades distintas a la española. No se identificaron factores de riesgo relacionados con la infección por VHC en 22 (51,2%) de los pacientes, y 41 (95,3%) habían tenido oportunidades de diagnóstico en visitas previas al sistema de salud. De los 18 pacientes analizados mediante elastografía transitoria, 7 (38,8%) presentaban cirrosis en el momento del diagnóstico. Se logró vincular a la atención médica posterior a 33 (77%) de los pacientes con infección activa. CONCLUSIONES: Las tasas de infección activa por VHC detectadas en el programa de cribado fueron más altas que la prevalencia estimada en la población general. El cribado oportunista de VHC en los SU puede ser de utilidad para aumentar el diagnóstico y debe ser considerado como una herramienta para la eliminación de la hepatitis C.

Rapid antigen test for adenovirus in children: Age and onset of symptoms are important / Antígeno de adenovirus en niños: la edad y la aparición de los síntomas son importantes

Introduction: Respiratory infection is the most common human adenovirus (HAdV) disease accounting for 7–8% of viral respiratory diseases in children less than 5 years. Differentiation of bacterial infections and viral infections is a common clinical problem. Material and methods: One hundred oropharyngeal swabs obtained from October 2019 to November 2020 from patients attending the paediatric emergency room with suspicion of upper respiratory tract infection and negative results in influenza and RSV tests were included. Oropharyngeal swabs specimens were rapidly processed with STANDARD™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA and the results were confirmed by RealStar® Adenovirus PCR Kit 1.0 (Altona diagnostics). Results: STANDARD™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA had sensitivity and specificity values of 71.93% and 100% respectively. The performance of the test was higher in samples from children younger than 24 months and taken less than 72h since the beginning of symptoms. In this subgroup the test had 88.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Conclusion: STANDARD™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA may improve the management of respiratory diseases in children younger than 24 months and less than 72h since the beginning of symptoms in paediatric emergency rooms.(AU)

Introducción: Las infecciones respiratorias son la enfermedad más común asociada a los adenovirus humanos (AdvH)y causan del 7 al 8% de las enfermedades respiratorias víricas en niños menores de 5 años. La distinción entre las infecciones bacterianas y las víricas constituye un problema clínico frecuente. Materiales y métodos: El estudio incluyó 100 hisopos orofaríngeos obtenidos entre octubre de 2019 y noviembre de 2020 de pacientes que habían acudido a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas con sospecha de infección de las vías respiratorias superiores y resultados negativos en las pruebas de gripe y VRS. Las muestras de los hisopos orofaríngeos se procesaron rápidamente con Standard™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA y los resultados se confirmaron mediante RealStar® Adenovirus PCR Kit 1.0 (altona Diagnostics). Resultados: Standard™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA tenía unos valores de sensibilidad y especificidad del 71,93% y el 100%, respectivamente. El rendimiento de la prueba fue superior en muestras de niños menores de 24 meses y tomadas menos de 72 horas después del inicio de los síntomas. En este subgrupo, la prueba tuvo una sensibilidad del 88,8% y una especificidad del 100%. Conclusión: Standard™ F Adeno Respi Ag FIA puede mejorar la gestión de las enfermedades respiratorias en niños menores de 24 meses con menos de 72 desde el inicio de los síntomas en servicios de urgencias pediátricas.(AU)

Epidemiología y calidad asistencial de las intoxicaciones agudas en el adulto mayor de 65 años en Alicante, España / Epidemiology and quality of care of acute intoxication in people over 65 years of age in Alicante, Spain

Introducción El objetivo fue estudiar la epidemiología de las intoxicaciones agudas en el servicio de urgencias (SU) de un centro de tercer nivel y analizar el grado de cumplimiento de los indicadores de calidad (IC) en pacientes ≥65 años comparado con el resto de los adultos. Material y métodos Estudio observacional y retrospectivo, se incluyeron los casos diagnosticados de intoxicación aguda de pacientes >14 años atendidos en el SU de un hospital terciario. Se recogieron las variables demográficas, tipo de tóxicos y causa de la intoxicación, 19 IC y destino, siendo la variable de resultado el grado de cumplimiento de los IC. Resultados Se registraron 1.144 casos, 10,4% (n=119) personas ≥65 años. Hubo mayor proporción de mujeres en este grupo (72,8 vs. 60,9%; p=0,015), más intoxicación accidental (37,6 vs. 25,7% p=0,006), y menos voluntaria (35,0 vs. 49,6%; p=0,003), menos intoxicación por alcohol (5 vs. 17,8%; <0,001) y ningún caso intoxicado por drogas ilegales (p<0,001). En la mayoría de los IC tenían un alto grado de cumplimento (> 85%) en personas ≥65 años como en el resto de los adultos. De todos los IC hubo diferencias en la indicación de oxigenoterapia en el caso de intoxicación por monóxido de carbono (CO) en aquellos ≥65 años (64,2 vs. 40,9%; p=0,005). Conclusiones El perfil epidemiológico de la intoxicación en personas ≥65 años es diferente al de los más jóvenes y con un cumplimiento de los IC. Dado los resultados obtenidos no consideramos que existan diferencias en la asistencia del paciente intoxicado con respecto a su edad (AU)

Introduction The objective of this study was to examine the epidemiology of acute poisonings in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary center and to analyze the compliance level with quality indicators (QIs) in patients 65 years and older compared rest of adults. Materials and methods This was an observational and retrospective study that included diagnosed cases of acute poisoning in patients over 14 years old treated in the ED of a tertiary hospital. Demographic variables, type of toxic substances, and cause of poisoning were collected, along with 19 QIs and patient outcomes, with the main outcome variable being the degree of compliance with the QIs. Results A total of 1144 cases were recorded, with 10.4% (n=119) being patients 65 years and older. Patients 65 years and older were more likely to be female (72.8% vs. 60.9%; p=0.015), experience more accidental poisonings (37.6% vs. 25.7%; p=0.006), and fewer intentional poisonings (35.0% vs. 49.6%; p=0.003). There were fewer cases of alcohol poisoning (5% vs. 17.8%; p<0.001), and no cases of illegal drug poisoning (p<0.001) in this age group. Most QIs showed a high degree of compliance (>85%) in both patients 65 years and older and rest of adults. However, there were differences in the indication of oxygen therapy in cases of carbon monoxide poisoning (64.2% vs. 40.9%; p=0.005). Conclusions The epidemiological profile of poisoning in patients 65 years and older differs from that of adult patients, with a similar degree of compliance with QIs. Based on the results obtained, there does not appear to be significant differences in the management of poisoned patients based on their age (AU)

Nonadverse COVID-19 evolution predictors: the CoNAE scale. / Predictores de evolución no adversa en pacientes con COVID-19: escala CoNAE (COVID-19 non-adverse evolution).

OBJECTIVES: Tools to identify patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 are as yet unavailable. Our aims were to identify factors associated with nonadverse outcomes and develop a scale to predict nonadverse evolution in patients with COVID-19 (the CoNAE scale) in hospital emergency departments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients who came to one of our area's national health service hospitals for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection from July 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. From case records we collected sociodemographic information, underlying comorbidity and ongoing treatments, other relevant medical history details, and vital constants on arrival for triage. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors. RESULTS: The model showed that patients who had nonadverse outcomes were younger, female, and vaccinated against COVID-19 (2 doses at the time of the study). They arrived with normal vital signs (heart rate, diastolic and systolic pressures, temperature, and oxygen saturation) and had none of the following concomitant diseases or factors: heart failure other heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, liver disease, dementia, history of malignant tumors, and they were not being treated with oral or other systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant therapy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.840 (95% CI, 0.834-0.847). CONCLUSION: We developed the CoNAE scale to predict nonadverse outcomes. This scale may be useful in triage for evaluating patients with COVID-19. It may also help predict safe discharge or plan the level of care that patients require not only in a hospital emergency department but also in urgent primary care settings or out-of-hospital emergency care.

OBJETIVO: Faltan herramientas para identificar a los pacientes con COVID-19 moderado o leve. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar variables asociadas a la evolución no adversa y diseñar un modelo predictivo de evolución favorable en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) por infección por SARS-CoV-2. METODO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 que acudieron a alguno de los SUH de hospitales públicos de una área por una infección por COVID-19 entre el 1 de julio de 2020 y el 31 de julio de 2021. Los datos recogidos para este estudio incluyeron información sociodemográfica, comorbilidades basales y tratamientos, otros datos de antecedentes y registro de los signos vitales a la llegada (triaje) al SUH. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable multinivel para desarrollar los modelos predictivos. RESULTADOS: Las personas que tuvieron resultados no adversos eran más jóvenes, mujeres, habían recibido dos dosis de la vacuna COVID-19 en el momento del estudio, tenían signos vitales (frecuencia cardiaca-presión diastólica/sistólica, temperatura y saturación de oxígeno) dentro de un rango normal al llegar al triaje del SUH, y no tenían ninguna de las siguientes comorbilidades: insuficiencia cardiaca, enfermedad coronaria, hipertensión arterial, diabetes, enfermedad hepática, demencia, antecedentes de tumores malignos o prescripción de corticosteroides orales sistémicos o inmunosupresores como medicación basal. El modelo tenía un área bajo la curva (ABC) de 0,8404 (IC 95%: 0,8342-0,8466). CONCLUSIONES: Se ha desarrollado una escala de predicción de resultados no adversos que pueden ser útil como herramienta de triaje, así como para determinar el alta segura y para adaptar el nivel de atención que el paciente requiere, no sólo en el SUH, sino también a nivel de atención de emergencia primaria o extrahospitalaria.

Predictores de evolución no adversa en pacientes con COVID-19: escala CoNAE (COVID-19 non-adverse evolution) / Nonadverse COVID-19 evolution predictors: the CoNAE scale

Objetivos: Faltan herramientas para identificar a los pacientes con COVID-19 moderado o leve. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar variables asociadas a la evolución no adversa y diseñar un modelo predictivo de evolución favorable en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) por infección por SARS-CoV-2. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de pacientes con infección por SARS-CoV-2 que acudieron a alguno de los SUH de hospitales públicos de unaa área por una infección por COVID-19 entre el 1 de julio de 2020 y el 31 de julio de 2021. Los datos recogidos para este estudio incluyeron información sociodemográfica, comorbilidades basales y tratamientos, otros datos de antecedentes y registro de los signos vitales a la llegada (triaje) al SUH. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable multinivel para desarrollar los modelos predictivos. Resultados: Las personas que tuvieron resultados no adversos eran más jóvenes, mujeres, habían recibido dos dosis de la vacuna COVID-19 en el momento del estudio, tenían signos vitales (frecuencia cardiaca-presión diastólica/sistólica, temperatura y saturación de oxígeno) dentro de un rango normal al llegar al triaje del SUH, y no tenían ninguna de las siguientes comorbilidades: insuficiencia cardiaca, enfermedad coronaria, hipertensión arterial, diabetes, enfermedad hepática, demencia, antecedentes de tumores malignos o prescripción de corticosteroides orales sistémicos o inmunosupresores como medicación basal. El modelo tenía un área bajo la curva (ABC) de 0,8404 (IC 95%: 0,8342-0,8466). Conclusiones: Se ha desarrollado una escala de predicción de resultados no adversos que pueden ser útil como herramienta de triaje, así como para determinar el alta segura y para adaptar el nivel de atención que el paciente requiere, no sólo en el SUH, sino también a nivel de atención de emergencia primaria o extrahospitalaria. (AU)

Background and objectives: Tools to identify patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 are as yet unavailable. Our aims were to identify factors associated with nonadverse outcomes and develop a scale to predict nonadverse evolution in patients with COVID-19 (the CoNAE scale) in hospital emergency departments. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who came to one of our area’s national health service hospitals for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection from July 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021. From case records we collected sociodemographicinformation, underlying comorbidity and ongoing treatments, other relevant medical history details, and vital constants on arrival for triage. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors. Results: The model showed that patients who had nonadverse outcomes were younger, female, and vaccinated against COVID-19 (2 doses at the time of the study). They arrived with normal vital signs (heart rate, diastolic and systolic pressures, temperature, and oxygen saturation) and had none of the following concomitant diseases or factors: heart failure other heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, liver disease, dementia, history of malignant tumors, and they were not being treated with oral or other systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressant therapy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.840 (95% CI, 0.834-0.847). Conclusions: We developed the CoNAE scale to predict nonadverse outcomes. This scale may be useful in triage for evaluating patients with COVID-19. It may also help predict safe discharge or plan the level of care that patients require not only in a hospital emergency department but also in urgent primary care settings or out-of-hospital emergency care. (AU)