The medical treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by tissue hypoperfusion due to the inadequate cardiac output to maintain the tissue oxygen demand. Despite some advances in cardiogenic shock management, extremely high mortality is still associated with this clinical syndrome. Its management is based on the immediate stabilization of hemodynamic parameters through medical care and the use of mechanical circulatory supports in specialized centers. This review aims to understand the cardiogenic shock current medical treatment, consisting mainly of inotropic drugs, vasopressors and coronary revascularization. In addition, we highlight the relevance of applying measures to other organ levels based on the optimization of mechanical ventilation and the appropriate initiation of renal replacement therapy.

Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: revascularization strategy according to ischemic territory.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The association of revascularization strategy with clinical outcomes according to the ischemic territory of nonculprit lesion has not been documented in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study aimed to compare outcomes between culprit-only and immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to ischemic territory in patients with AMI-CS. METHODS: A total of 536 patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease from the SMART-RESCUE registry were categorized according to ischemic territory (nonculprit left main/proximal left anterior descending artery [LM/pLAD] vs culprit LM/pLAD vs no LM/pLAD). The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to heart failure, or repeat revascularization at 1 year. RESULTS: Among the total population, 108 patients had nonculprit LM/pLAD, 228 patients had culprit LM/pLAD, and 200 patients had no LM/pLAD, with the risk of POCE being higher in patients with large ischemic territory lesions (53.6% vs 53.4% vs 39.6%; P = .02). Multivessel PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of POCE compared with culprit-only PCI in patients with nonculprit LM/pLAD (40.7% vs 66.9%; HR, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.29-0.91; P=.02), but not in those with culprit LM/pLAD (P=.46) or no LM/pLAD (P=.47). A significant interaction existed between revascularization strategy and large nonculprit ischemic territory (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Large ischemic territory involvement was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI-CS and multivessel disease. Immediate multivessel PCI might improve clinical outcomes in patients with a large nonculprit ischemic burden.

El shock cardiogénico como problema de salud. Fisiología, clasificación y detección / Cardiogenic shock as a health issue: Physiology, classification, and detection

El shock cardiogénico (SC) es un síndrome heterogéneo con elevada mortalidad y creciente incidencia. Se trata de una situación en la que existe un desequilibrio entre las necesidades tisulares de oxígeno y la capacidad del sistema cardiovascular para satisfacerlas debido a una disfunción cardiaca aguda. Históricamente, los síndromes coronarios agudos han sido la causa principal de SC; sin embargo, los casos no isquémicos han aumentado en incidencia. Su fisiopatología implica el daño isquémico del miocardio, una respuesta tanto simpática como del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona e inflamatoria, que perpetúan la situación de hipoperfusión tisular conduciendo finalmente a la disfunción multiorgánica. La caracterización de los pacientes con SC mediante una valoración triaxial y la universalización de la escala SCAI ha permitido una estandarización de la estratificación de la gravedad del SC que, sumada a la detección precoz y el enfoque Hub and Spoke, podrían contribuir a mejorar el pronóstico de los pacientes en SC. (AU)

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and increasing incidence. It is a condition where there is an imbalance between tissue oxygen demands and the cardiovascular system's capacity to meet them due to acute cardiac dysfunction. Historically, acute coronary syndromes have been the primary cause of CS; however, non-ischemic cases have seen a rise in incidence. Its pathophysiology involves myocardial ischemic damage, a sympathetic, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system, and inflammatory response, perpetuating the situation of tissue hypoperfusion, ultimately leading to multiorgan dysfunction. Characterizing CS patients through a triaxial assessment and the widespread use of the SCAI scale has allowed standardization of CS severity stratification, which, coupled with early detection and the “Hub and Spoke” approach, could contribute to improve the prognosis of CS patients. (AU)

Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There are no clinical data on the efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiogenic shock. The current study sought to evaluate the impact of intravascular imaging-guided PCI in patients with AMI and cardiogenic shock. METHODS: Among a total of 28 732 patients from the nationwide pooled registry of KAMIR-NIH (November, 2011 to December, 2015) and KAMIR-V (January, 2016 to June, 2020), we selected a total of 1833 patients (6.4%) with AMI and cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI of the culprit vessel. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1 year, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Among the study population, 375 patients (20.5%) underwent intravascular imaging-guided PCI and 1458 patients (79.5%) underwent angiography-guided PCI. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE than angiography-guided PCI (19.5% vs 28.2%; HR, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.45-0.77; P<.001), mainly driven by a lower risk of cardiac death (13.7% vs 24.0%; adjusted HR, 0.53; 95%CI, 0.39-0.72; P<.001). These results were consistent in propensity score matching (HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.46-0.99), inverse probability weighting (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.45-0.83), and Bayesian analysis (Odds ratio, 0.66, 95% credible interval, 0.49-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: In AMI patients with cardiogenic shock, intravascular imaging-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACE at 1-year than angiography-guided PCI, mainly driven by the lower risk of cardiac death.

Cardiogenic shock as a health issue. Physiology, classification, and detection.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome with high mortality and a growing incidence. It is characterized by an imbalance between the tissue oxygen demands and the capacity of the cardiovascular system to meet these demands, due to acute cardiac dysfunction. Historically, acute coronary syndromes have been the primary cause of CS. However, non-ischemic cases have seen a rise in incidence. The pathophysiology involves ischemic damage of the myocardium and a sympathetic, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and inflammatory response, perpetuating the situation of tissue hypoperfusion and ultimately leading to multiorgan dysfunction. The characterization of CS patients through a triaxial assessment and the widespread use of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) scale has allowed standardization of the severity stratification of CS; this, coupled with early detection and the "hub and spoke" approach, could contribute to improving the prognosis of these patients.

Perfil clínico, abordaje y pronóstico del paciente con shock cardiogénico sometido a traslado interhospitalario en España / Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain

Introducción y objetivos El objetivo es analizar el perfil clínico, el abordaje y el pronóstico del shock cardiogénico (SC) por infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IAMCEST) que requiere traslado interhospitalario, así como el impacto pronóstico de las variables estructurales de los centros en este contexto. Métodos Se incluyó a los pacientes con SC-IAMCEST atendidos en centros con capacidad de revascularización (2016-2020). Se consideró a: a) pacientes atendidos durante todo el ingreso en hospitales con cardiología intervencionista sin cirugía cardiaca; b) pacientes atendidos en hospitales con cardiología intervencionista y cirugía cardiaca, y c) pacientes trasladados a centros con cardiología intervencionista y cirugía cardiaca. Se analizó la asociación del volumen de SC-IAMCEST atendidos y la disponibilidad de cuidados intensivos cardiológicos (UCIC) y trasplante cardiaco con la mortalidad hospitalaria. Resultados Se incluyeron 4.189 episodios, 1.389 (33,2%) del grupo A, 2.627 del grupo B (62,7%) y 173 del grupo C (4,1%). Los pacientes trasladados eran más jóvenes, tenían más riesgo cardiovascular y recibieron más frecuentemente revascularización, asistencia circulatoria y trasplante cardiaco durante el ingreso (p<0,001). Los pacientes trasladados presentaron menor tasa bruta de mortalidad (el 46,2 frente al 60,3% del grupo A y el 54,4% del grupo B; p<0,001). Mayor volumen asistencial (OR=0,75; p =0,009) y disponibilidad de UCIC (OR=0,80; p =0,047) se asociaron con menor mortalidad. Conclusiones El porcentaje de SC-IAMCEST trasladados en nuestro medio es bajo. Los pacientes trasladados son más jóvenes y reciben más procedimientos invasivos. Los traslados a centros con mayor volumen y UCIC presentan menor mortalidad. (AU)

Introduction and objectives The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical profile, management, and prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) requiring interhospital transfer, as well as the prognostic impact of structural variables of the treating centers in this setting. Methods This study included patients with STEMI-CS treated at revascularization-capable centers from 2016 to 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups: group A: patients attended throughout their admission at hospitals with interventional cardiology without cardiac surgery; group B: patients treated at hospitals with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery; and group C: patients transferred to centers with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. We analyzed the association between the volume of STEMI-CS cases treated, the availability of cardiac intensive care units (CICU), and heart transplant with hospital mortality. Results A total of 4189 episodes were included: 1389 (33.2%) from group A, 2627 from group B (62.7%), and 173 from group C (4.1%). Transferred patients were younger, had a higher cardiovascular risk, and more commonly underwent revascularization, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant during hospitalization (P<.001). The crude mortality rate was lower in transferred patients (46.2% vs 60.3% in group A and 54.4% in group B, (P<.001)). Lower mortality was associated with a higher volume of care and CICU availability (OR, 0.75, P=.009; and 0.80, P=.047). Conclusions The proportion of transfers in patients with STEMI-CS in our setting is low. Transferred patients were younger and underwent more invasive procedures. Mortality was lower among patients transferred to centers with a higher volume of STEMI-CS cases and CICU. (AU)

Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical profile, management, and prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) requiring interhospital transfer, as well as the prognostic impact of structural variables of the treating centers in this setting. METHODS: This study included patients with STEMI-CS treated at revascularization-capable centers from 2016 to 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups: group A: patients attended throughout their admission at hospitals with interventional cardiology without cardiac surgery; group B: patients treated at hospitals with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery; and group C: patients transferred to centers with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. We analyzed the association between the volume of STEMI-CS cases treated, the availability of cardiac intensive care units (CICU), and heart transplant with hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 4189 episodes were included: 1389 (33.2%) from group A, 2627 from group B (62.7%), and 173 from group C (4.1%). Transferred patients were younger, had a higher cardiovascular risk, and more commonly underwent revascularization, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant during hospitalization (P<.001). The crude mortality rate was lower in transferred patients (46.2% vs 60.3% in group A and 54.4% in group B, (P<.001)). Lower mortality was associated with a higher volume of care and CICU availability (OR, 0.75, P=.009; and 0.80, P=.047). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of transfers in patients with STEMI-CS in our setting is low. Transferred patients were younger and underwent more invasive procedures. Mortality was lower among patients transferred to centers with a higher volume of STEMI-CS cases and CICU.

Registro multicéntrico impella CP para shock cardiogénico o angioplastía de alto riesgo protegida en Chile / Use of impella CP in high risk coronary angioplasty and cardiogenic shock: a registry

Antecedentes: El Shock Cardiogénico (SC) y las Angioplastías de Alto Riesgo (AAR) están asociadas con altas tasas de mortalidad. El uso del dispositivo Impella CP podría reducir el riesgo de muerte en estos escenarios. En Chile no existen reportes evaluando el uso del dispositivo Impella CP. Objetivo: Analizar los desenlaces clínicos en pacientes que fueron sometidos al uso del dispositivo Impella CP por SC o por AAR. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en 17 pacientes, los cuales representan el total de implantes realizados en el país, entre octubre 2021 y agosto 2023. Se describió las características, demográficas, procedimentales y después del implante. Se estimó la mortalidad general y se identificaron factores asociados. Resultados: La edad de los pacientes fue 69± 3,7 años y 88,2% fueron hombres. El 64,7% recibió el dispositivo por SC y 35,3% por AAR. Dentro de las comorbilidades estudiadas, la hipertensión arterial fue la más frecuente, 94,1%. Un 58,8% de los pacientes fueron revascularizados a través de la arteria radial. El 29,4% recibió el dispositivo previo a la angioplastía y 70,6% lo recibió después. El 47,1% de las angioplastías fue guiada por imágenes. En 11,8% de ellos se realizó litotricia intracoronaria y 5,9% por ablación intracoronaria. Los pacientes estuvieron 13 ±3,4 días con el soporte. La mortalidad global fue de 41,2%. Conclusiones: El uso del dispositivo Impella presentó pocas complicaciones vasculares. La mortalidad asociada con su colocación en Chile fue relativamente similar con la reportada en la literatura.

Background: Cardiogenic shock and high-risk Angioplasty are associated with a high mortality rate. Using the Impella CP device could reduce the risk of death in these scenarios. In Chile, there are no studies evaluating the use of the Impella CP device. Objective: To analyse the clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone placement of the Impella CP device for cardiogenic shock and high-risk angioplasties. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 17 patients, which represent the total number of implants performed in the country, between October 2021 and August 2023. The demographic, procedural and post-implant characteristics were described. Overall mortality and associated factors were identified. Results: The age was 69± 3.7 years, where 88.2% were men. 64.7% of patients received the device by SC and 35.3% by AAR. Among the comorbidities studied, arterial hypertension was the most frequent with 94.1%. 58.8% of patients were revascularized through the radial artery. 29.4% of patients received the device before angioplasty and 70.6% received it afterwards. 47.1% of angioplasties were image-guided, 11.8% had intracoronary lithotripsy, and 5.9% had intracoronary ablation. The patients spent 13 ±3.4 days with the support. Overall mortality was 41.2%. Conclusion: use of the Impella device was associated with few vascular complications. Mortality associated with use of the Impella device in Chile was similar to that previously reported in other studies.

Shock cardiogénico en el contexto de los síndromes coronarios agudos en Argentina: resultados del Registro ARGEN SHOCK 2 / Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Argentina: Results from the ARGEN SHOCK 2 Registry

RESUMEN El shock cardiogénico (SC) es una complicación grave del infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) y constituye una de sus principales causas de muerte. Objetivos: Conocer las características clínicas, estrategias de tratamiento, evolución intrahospitalaria y mortalidad a 30 días del SC en Argentina. Material y métodos: Se trata de un registro prospectivo, multicéntrico, de pacientes internados con SC en el contexto de los IAM con y sin elevación del segmento ST durante 14 meses (1 de agosto 2021 al 30 de septiembre 2022) en 23 centros de Argentina. Resultados: Se incluyeron 114 pacientes, edad 64 (58-73) años, 72% hombres. El 76,3% de los casos corresponden a IAM con elevación del segmento ST, 12,3% a IAM sin elevación del segmento ST, el 7% a infarto de ventrículo derecho y el 4,4% a complicaciones mecánicas. El SC estuvo presente desde el ingreso en el 66,6% de los casos. Revascularización: 91,1%, uso de inotrópicos: 98,2%, asistencia respiratoria mecánica: 59,6%, SwanGanz: 33,3%, balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico: 30,1%. La mortalidad intrahospitalaria global fue 60,5%, sin diferencias entre los IAM con o sin elevación del segmento ST, y a 30 días del 62,6%. Conclusiones: La morbimortalidad del SC es muy elevada a pesar de la alta tasa de reperfusión empleada.

ABSTRACT Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and constitutes one of the leading causes of death. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, hospital outcome and 30-day mortality of CS in Argentina. Methods: We conducted a prospective, and multicenter registry of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with and without ST-segment elevation complicated with CS that were hospitalized in 23 centers in Argentina for 14 months (between August 1, 2021, and September 30, 2022). Results: The cohort was made up of 114 patients; median age was 64 years (58-73) and 72% were women; 76.3% corresponded to ST-segment elevation AMI, 12.3% to non-ST-segment elevation AMI, 7% had right ventricular infarction and 4.4% had mechanical complications. In 66.6% of cases CS was present on admission. Revascularization: 91.1%, use of inotropic agents: 98.2%, mechanical ventilation: 59.6%, Swan-Ganz catheter: 33.3%, intra-aortic balloon pump: 30.1%. Overall in-hospital mortality was 60.5%, with no differences between AMI with or without ST-segment elevation, and was 62.6% at 30 days. Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality of CS are high despite the high rate of reperfusion therapy used.

A possible role for the venous-to-arterial CO2 difference in cardiogenic shock: an exploratory study. / Estudio exploratorio del rol de la diferencia venoarterial de dióxido de carbono en el shock cardiogénico.

OBJECTIVES: The venous-to-arterial CO2 partial pressure difference (CO2) is a marker of how adequately capillary blood flow is able to remove CO2 from tissues, but evidence regarding its usefulness in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is scarce The main objective of this study was to describe the changes in CO2 in patients with cardiogenic shock during the 48 hours after hospital admission. A secondary objective was to analyze the association between CO2 and in-hospital mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiogenic shock refractory to treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational exploratory study in a single hospital. Patients in cardiogenic shock who were admitted to a cardiology critical care unit were included. We measured CO2 on inclusion and 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after admission to the unit. Variables were explored with logistic regression analysis and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included. In-hospital mortality due to CVD was 20%. CO2 peaked initially and decreased gradually over the first 48 hours of care. In-hospital mortality tended to be higher in patients with the highest CO2 values, but the difference was not significant. High CO2 values at 24 hours were associated with refractory cardiogenic shock. The negative predictive value of a CO2 value lower than 6 mmHg at 12 hours was 87% for mortality due to CVD. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study suggests that CO2 could be a helpful additional marker to measure when managing cardiogenic shock. CO2 lower than 6 mmHg between 12 and 24 hours after admission may identify patients at low risk of death due to CVD or refractory cardiogenic shock.

OBJETIVO: La diferencia venoarterial de dióxido de carbono (CO2) representa la adecuación del flujo capilar para eliminar CO2 tisular, sin embargo, su evidencia en pacientes con shock cardiogénico (SC) es escasa. El objetivo primario fue caracterizar la cinética de la diferencia venoarterial de CO2 en pacientes con SC durante las primeras 48 horas de ingreso. El objetivo secundario fue analizar la asociación de la CO2 con la mortalidad intrahospitalaria de causa cardiovascular y el SC refractario. METODO: Estudio exploratorio, observacional, prospectivo y unicéntrico. Se incluyeron pacientes en SC ingresados en una unidad de cuidados críticos cardiológicos. Se determinó la CO2 a la inclusión, a las 6, 12, 24 y 48 horas y se realizó un análisis de regresión logística y curvas de la característica operativa del receptor. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 50 pacientes. La mortalidad cardiovascular intrahospitalaria fue del 20%. La cinética de la CO2 mostró un pico inicial y un progresivo descenso durante las primeras 48 horas. Los pacientes con valores más altos de CO2 tuvieron una mayor mortalidad cardiovascular intrahospitalaria, pero esta diferencia no fue significativa. A las 24 horas, valores elevados de CO2 se asociaron significativamente con SC refractario. Un valor inferior a 6 mmHg a las 12 horas mostró un valor predictivo negativo del 87% para mortalidad cardiovascular. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio exploratorio sugiere la potencial utilidad de la CO2 como biomarcador adicional en el manejo del SC. La CO2 permite identificar pacientes con bajo riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular y SC refractario cuando sus valores son inferiores a 6 mmHg a las 12-24 horas de evolución.

Estudio exploratorio del rol de la diferencia venoarterial de dióxido de carbono en el shock cardiogénico / A possible role for the venous-to-arterial CO2 difference in cardiogenic shock: an exploratory study

Introducción y objetivos: La diferencia venoarterial de dióxido de carbono (ΔCO2) representa la adecuación del flujo capilar para eliminar CO2 tisular, sin embargo, su evidencia en pacientes con shock cardiogénico (SC) es escasa”. El objetivo primario fue caracterizar la cinética de la diferencia venoarterial de ΔCO2 en pacientes con SC durante las primeras 48 horas de ingreso. El objetivo secundario fue analizar la asociación de la ΔCO2 con la mortalidad intrahospitalaria de causa cardiovascular y el SC refractario. Método: Estudio exploratorio, observacional, prospectivo y unicéntrico. Se incluyeron pacientes en SC ingresados en una unidad de cuidados críticos cardiológicos. Se determinó la ΔCO2 a la inclusión, a las 6, 12, 24 y 48 horas y se realizó un análisis de regresión logística y curvas de la característica operativa del receptor. Resultados: Se incluyeron 50 pacientes. La mortalidad cardiovascular intrahospitalaria fue del 20%. La cinética de la ΔCO2 mostró un pico inicial y un progresivo descenso durante las primeras 48 horas. Los pacientes con valores más altos de ΔCO2 tuvieron una mayor mortalidad cardiovascular intrahospitalaria, pero esta diferencia no fue significativa. A las 24 horas, valores elevados de ΔCO2 se asociaron significativamente con SC refractario. Un valor inferior a 6 mmHg a las 12 horas mostró un valor predictivo negativo del 87% para mortalidad cardiovascular. Conclusiones: Este estudio exploratorio sugiere la potencial utilidad de la ΔCO2 como biomarcador adicional en el manejo del SC. La ΔCO2 permite identificar pacientes con bajo riesgo de mortalidad cardiovascular y SC refractario cuando sus valores son inferiores a 6 mmHg a las 12-24 horas de evolución. (AU)

Background and objectives: The venous-to-arterial CO2 partial pressure difference ('CO2) is a marker of how adequately capillary blood flow is able to remove CO2 from tissues, but evidence regarding its usefulness in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) is scarce The main objective of this study was to describe the changes in 'CO2 in patients with cardiogenic shock during the 48 hours after hospital admission. A secondary objective was to analyze the association between 'CO2 and in-hospital mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiogenic shock refractory to treatment. Methods: Prospective observational exploratory study in a single hospital. Patients in cardiogenic shock who were admitted to a cardiology critical care unit were included. We measured 'CO2 on inclusion and 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after admission to the unit. Variables were explored with logistic regression analysis and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. Results: A total of 50 patients were included. In-hospital mortality due to CVD was 20%. 'CO2 peaked initially and decreased gradually over the first 48 hours of care. In-hospital mortality tended to be higher in patients with the highest 'CO2 values, but the difference was not significant. High 'CO2 values at 24 hours were associated with refractory cardiogenic shock. The negative predictive value of a 'CO2 value lower than 6 mmHg at 12 hours was 87% for mortality due to CVD. Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that 'CO2 could be a helpful additional marker to measure when managing cardiogenic shock. 'CO2 lower than 6 mmHg between 12 and 24 hours after admission may identify patients at low risk of death due to CVD or refractory cardiogenic shock. (AU)

Eficacia de la tromboaspiración en pacientes con shock cardiogénico secundario a infarto agudo de miocardio y alta carga trombótica / Efficacy of thrombus aspiration in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and high thrombus burden

Introducción y objetivos: Las guías actuales no recomiendan la aspiración sistemática de trombos (TA) en el infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM) debido a la falta de beneficio observada en ensayos aleatorizados previos. Sin embargo, los datos en el shock cardiogénico (SC) que complica un IAM son limitados. Métodos: Se incluyó a 575 pacientes con IAM complicado por SC, que se estratificaron en 2 grupos según el uso o no uso de la tromboaspiración. El objetivo primario del estudio fue un combinado de muerte por cualquier causa o rehospitalización por insuficiencia cardiaca a los 6 meses. La eficacia de la tromboaspiración se evaluó en función de la carga de trombo (grado I-IV frente a V). Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la muerte intrahospitalaria (28,9% frente a 33,5%; p=0,28), ni en la muerte o rehospitalización por insuficiencia cardiaca a los 6 meses (32,4 frente a 39,4%; HRadj: 0,80; IC95%, 0,59-1,09; p=0,16) entre los grupos con y sin tromboaspiración. Sin embargo, en 368 pacientes con mayor carga trombótica (grado V), el grupo de tromboaspiración tuvo un riesgo significativamente menor de muerte por todas las causas o rehospitalización por insuficiencia cardiaca a los 6 meses comparado con el grupo sin tromboaspiración (33,4 frente a 46,3%, HR ajustada: 0,59; IC95%, 0,41-0,85; p=0,004), con una interacción significativa entre la carga de trombo y el uso de tromboaspiración para el resultado primario (pint ajustado=0,03). Conclusiones: El uso rutinario de TA no redujo los resultados clínicos adversos a corto y medio plazo en pacientes con IAM complicado con SC. Sin embargo, en pacientes seleccionados con una elevada carga trombótica, el uso de tromboaspiración podría asociarse a una mejora de los resultados clínicos. El estudio se registró en ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02985008).(AU)

Introduction and objectives: Current guidelines do not recommend routine thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) because no benefits were observed in previous randomized trials. However, there are limited data in cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating AMI. Methods: We included 575 patients with AMI complicated by CS. The participants were stratified into the TA and no-TA groups based on use of TA. The primary outcome was a composite of 6-month all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization. The efficacy of TA was additionally assessed based on thrombus burden (grade I-IV vs V). Results: No significant difference was found in in-hospital death (28.9% vs 33.5%; P=.28), or 6-month death, or heart failure rehospitalization (32.4% vs 39.4%; HRadj: 0.80; 95%CI, 0.59-1.09; P=.16) between the TA and no-TA groups. However, in 368 patients with a higher thrombus burden (grade V), the TA group had a significantly lower risk of 6-month all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization than the no-TA group (33.4% vs 46.3%; HRadj: 0.59; 95%CI, 0.41-0.85; P=.004), with significant interaction between thrombus burden and use of TA for primary outcome (adjusted Pint=.03). Conclusions: Routine use of TA did not reduce short- and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by CS. However, in select patients with a high thrombus burden, the use of TA might be associated with improved clinical outcomes. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02985008).(AU)

Anti-endotoxin antibodies consumption in cardiovascular collapse: Pathophysiological concerns / Consumo de anticuerpos antiendotoxina en el shock: relación etiológica

Objective Abnormal endotoxin activity in critically ill patients has been described in the absence of Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infection. As disease severity seems to be crucial in the detection of this phenomenon, we decided to assess and compare endotoxin exposure in those patients representing the critical situation: septic shock and cardiogenic shock. Design Prospective, observational non intervention study. Setting Critical Care Department of a University tertiary hospital. Patients Cardiogenic shock (CS) and septic shock (SS) patients. Interventions None. Measurements and main results Follow-up was performed for the first three days. Inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and interleuquin-6) and IgM antiendotoxin-core antibodies titter (IgM EndoCAb) were daily analyzed. Sixty-two patients were included; twenty-five patients with SS and thirty-seven with CS. Microbial etiology was established in 23 SS patients (92%) and GNB were present in 13 cases (52%). Although infection was suspected and even treated in 30 CS patients (81%), any episode could be finally confirmed. EndoCAb consumption was more intense in SS patients, although twenty-two CS patients (59.5%) had IgM anti-endotoxin value below 10th percentile range for healthy people. No statistically significant difference in endotoxin exposure was detected between Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections in the SS group. Endotoxin exposure ability to distinguish between SS and CS was moderate (AUC 0.7892, 95% IC: 0.6564–0.9218).Conclusions In the severely ill patient some mechanisms take place allowing endotoxin incursion and therefore blurring the limits of diseases pathophysiology. Our work representatively shows how exposure to endotoxin was not fully capable of distinguishing between CS and SS. (AU)

Objetivo En el paciente crítico se ha descrito una actividad incrementada de la endotoxina no asociada a infección por bacterias gramnegativas (BGN). La gravedad de la enfermedad influye en este fenómeno, por ello realizamos este estudio en el paciente crítico por antonomasia: shock séptico y cardiogénico. Diseño Estudio prospectivo, observacional, sin intervención.Lugar de estudioUnidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Pacientes Pacientes en shock cardiogénico (SC) o séptico (SS).Intervención Ninguna. Determinaciones y principales resultados Seguimiento durante los 3 primeros días. Proteína C reactiva, procalcitonina e interleucina-6, y el título de anticuerpos IgM anti-edotoxina (IgM EndoCAb) se analizaron diariamente. Se incluyó a 62 pacientes; 25 con SS y 37 con SC. La etiología fue identificada en 23 pacientes con SS (92%), los BGN estuvieron presentes en 13 casos (52%). Se sospechó e incluso trató la infección en 30 pacientes con SC, pero en ningún caso se pudo confirmar. El consumo de EndoCAb fue más intenso en los pacientes con SS, pero 22 pacientes con SC (59,5%) tuvieron unos valores por debajo del percentil 10. Los niveles de EndoCAb no fueron significativamente diferentes entre las infecciones por BGN y cocos grampositivos. La capacidad de EndoCab para diferenciar entre SC y SS resultó ser moderada (AUC 0,7892; IC del 95%, 0,6564-0,9218).Conclusiones En el paciente crítico es frecuente que la endotoxina provoque una respuesta inflamatoria y la sumación de distintos mecanismos fisiopatológicos. En este sentido, nuestro trabajo pone de manifiesto que la determinación de exposición a endotoxina no es totalmente capaz de distinguir entre los pacientes con SC y SS. (AU)

Código shock cardiogénico 2023. Documento de expertos para una organización multidisciplinaria que permita una atención de calidad / Cardiogenic shock code 2023. Expert document for a multidisciplinary organization that allows quality care

Pese a los esfuerzos realizados para mejorar la atención al shock cardiogénico (SC), incluyendo el desarrollo de dispositivos de asistencia circulatoria mecánica (ACM), su pronóstico continúa siendo desfavorable. En este contexto surgen iniciativas de código SC, basadas en proporcionar una asistencia rápida y de calidad a estos pacientes. Este documento multidisciplinario trata de justificar la necesidad de implantar el código SC, definiendo su estructura/organización, criterios de activación, flujo de pacientes según nivel asistencial e indicadores de calidad. Sus propósitos concretos son: a) presentar las peculiaridades de esta enfermedad y el aprendizaje del código infarto y de experiencias previas en SC; b) detallar las bases para el abordaje de estos pacientes, la estructura de los equipos, su logística, la elección del tipo de ACM y el momento de su implante, y c) abordar los desafíos para la implantación del código SC, como la singularidad del código SC pediátrico. Urge desarrollar una asistencia protocolizada, multidisciplinaria y centralizada en hospitales con gran volumen y experiencia que permita minimizar la inequidad en el acceso a la ACM y mejorar la supervivencia de estos enfermos. Solo el apoyo institucional y estructural de las distintas administraciones permitirá optimizar la atención al SC (AU)

Despite the efforts made to improve the care of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients, including the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the prognosis of these patients continues to be poor. In this context, CS code initiatives arise, based on providing adequate, rapid, and quality care to these patients. In this multidisciplinary document we try to justify the need to implement the SC code, defining its structure/organization, activation criteria, patient flow according to care level, and quality indicators. Our specific purposes are: a) to present the peculiarities of this condition and the lessons of infarction code and previous experiences in CS; b) to detail the structure of the teams, their logistics and the bases for the management of these patients, the choice of the type of MCS, and the moment of its implantation, and c) to address challenges to SC code implementation, including the uniqueness of the pediatric SC code. There is an urgent need to develop protocolized, multidisciplinary, and centralized care in hospitals with a large volume and experience that will minimize inequity in access to the MCS and improve the survival of these patients. Only institutional and structural support from the different administrations will allow optimizing care for CS (AU)

Catéter de arteria pulmonar en shock cardiogénico: novedades acerca de su valor pronóstico y marcadores derivados / Use of pulmonary artery catheter in patiens with cardiogenic shock: an upgrade

El uso del catéter de arteria pulmonar es un método eficaz para la monitorización de los pacientes críticos. Aunque ampliamente utilizado en las Unidades de Cuidados Críticos Cardiológicos, no se ha demostrado en estudios previos el beneficio de su uso. Registros recientes y numerosos en pacientes graves cursando shock cardiogénico muestran un beneficio en términos de mortalidad asociada, sobre todo relacionado con una adecuada interpretación. Además, nuevos parámetros relacionados con insuficiencia ventricular como son el poder cardíaco y el índice de pulsatilidad de arteria pulmonar, así como el conocimiento de las presiones de llenado ventriculares, tanto izquierdas, como derechas, ayudan en la toma de decisiones, las opciones de tratamiento y estimación del pronóstico. Complementando lo anterior, la modernización en la tecnología del catéter de arteria pulmonar permite la medición del gasto cardíaco de forma continua a través de un sistema termodilución integrada. Este sistema también permite la monitorización más precisa del ventrículo derecho por medio de la valoración continua de su fracción de eyección y volumen de fin de diástole. La información obtenida por medio del catéter de arteria pulmonar en shock cardiogénico ha llevado a que su uso comience a ser cada vez más frecuente en unidades de cuidados críticos cardiológicos y que se empleen estos valores por equipos de shock cardiogénico para la toma de decisiones complejas. La evidencia descrita sobre el valor pronóstico relacionada al uso del catéter de arteria pulmonar se resume en esta revisión.

The pulmonary artery catheter is an effective tool for monitoring critically ill patients; however, the evidence showed limited value and a posible increased risk. Recently, numerous registries in critical ill patients in cardiogenic shock have shown a benefit in mortality, especially related to an adequate interpretation of findings. In addition, new parameters related to ventricular failure, such as cardiac power output and pulmonary artery pulsatility index have shown to be useful for a better treatment and estimation of prognosis. Besides, determination of filling pressures (right and/or left side) have an important role in terms of prognosis and management. Advances in pulmonary artery catheter technology allows us to continuously measure cardiac output through an integrated thermodilution system. This system also allows the continuous assessment of right ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume. The information obtained has led to an increased use of the pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in cardiac Intensive Care Units allowing improvements in treatment and complex decision-making.

Efficacy of thrombus aspiration in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction and high thrombus burden.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines do not recommend routine thrombus aspiration in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) because no benefits were observed in previous randomized trials. However, there are limited data in cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating AMI. METHODS: We included 575 patients with AMI complicated by CS. The participants were stratified into the TA and no-TA groups based on use of TA. The primary outcome was a composite of 6-month all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization. The efficacy of TA was additionally assessed based on thrombus burden (grade I-IV vs V). RESULTS: No significant difference was found in in-hospital death (28.9% vs 33.5%; P=.28), or 6-month death, or heart failure rehospitalization (32.4% vs 39.4%; HRadj: 0.80; 95%CI, 0.59-1.09; P=.16) between the TA and no-TA groups. However, in 368 patients with a higher thrombus burden (grade V), the TA group had a significantly lower risk of 6-month all-cause death or heart failure rehospitalization than the no-TA group (33.4% vs 46.3%; HRadj: 0.59; 95%CI, 0.41-0.85; P=.004), with significant interaction between thrombus burden and use of TA for primary outcome (adjusted Pint=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of TA did not reduce short- and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI complicated by CS. However, in select patients with a high thrombus burden, the use of TA might be associated with improved clinical outcomes. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02985008).

Anti-endotoxin antibodies consumption in cardiovascular collapse: Pathophysiological concerns.

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal endotoxin activity in critically ill patients has been described in the absence of Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infection. As disease severity seems to be crucial in the detection of this phenomenon, we decided to assess and compare endotoxin exposure in those patients representing the critical situation: septic shock and cardiogenic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, observational non intervention study. SETTING: Critical Care Department of a University tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Cardiogenic shock (CS) and septic shock (SS) patients. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Follow-up was performed for the first three days. Inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and interleuquin-6) and IgM antiendotoxin-core antibodies titter (IgM EndoCAb) were daily analyzed. Sixty-two patients were included; twenty-five patients with SS and thirty-seven with CS. Microbial etiology was established in 23 SS patients (92%) and GNB were present in 13 cases (52%). Although infection was suspected and even treated in 30 CS patients (81%), any episode could be finally confirmed. EndoCAb consumption was more intense in SS patients, although twenty-two CS patients (59.5%) had IgM anti-endotoxin value below 10th percentile range for healthy people. No statistically significant difference in endotoxin exposure was detected between Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections in the SS group. Endotoxin exposure ability to distinguish between SS and CS was moderate (AUC 0.7892, 95% IC: 0.6564-0.9218). CONCLUSIONS: In the severely ill patient some mechanisms take place allowing endotoxin incursion and therefore blurring the limits of diseases pathophysiology. Our work representatively shows how exposure to endotoxin was not fully capable of distinguishing between CS and SS.

Cardiogenic shock code 2023. Expert document for a multidisciplinary organization that allows quality care.

Despite the efforts made to improve the care of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients, including the development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), the prognosis of these patients continues to be poor. In this context, CS code initiatives arise, based on providing adequate, rapid, and quality care to these patients. In this multidisciplinary document we try to justify the need to implement the SC code, defining its structure/organization, activation criteria, patient flow according to care level, and quality indicators. Our specific purposes are: a) to present the peculiarities of this condition and the lessons of infarction code and previous experiences in CS; b) to detail the structure of the teams, their logistics and the bases for the management of these patients, the choice of the type of MCS, and the moment of its implantation, and c) to address challenges to SC code implementation, including the uniqueness of the pediatric SC code. There is an urgent need to develop protocolized, multidisciplinary, and centralized care in hospitals with a large volume and experience that will minimize inequity in access to the MCS and improve the survival of these patients. Only institutional and structural support from the different administrations will allow optimizing care for CS.

Cinética del lactato para el pronóstico en el shock cardiogénico asistido con oxigenador extracorpóreo de membrana venoarterial / Lactate levels as a prognostic predict in cardiogenic shock under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

Introducción y objetivos: El lactato y su evolución se asocian con el pronóstico de los pacientes en shock, si bien es escasa la evidencia en aquellos asistidos con oxigenador extracorpóreo de membrana venoarterial (ECMO-VA). Nuestro objetivo es evaluar su valor pronóstico en shock cardiogénico asistido con ECMO-VA. Métodos: Estudio de pacientes tratados con ECMO-VA por shock cardiogénico de indicación médica entre julio de 2013 y abril de 2021. Se calculó el aclaramiento de lactato: (lactato inicial − lactato 6 h) / lactato inicial × tiempo exacto entre ambas determinaciones. Resultados: De 121 pacientes, 44 (36,4%) tenían infarto agudo de miocardio; 42 (34,7%), implante intraparada; 14 (11,6%), tromboembolia pulmonar, 14 (11,6%), tormenta arrítmica y 6 (5,0%), miocarditis fulminante. A los 30 días habían fallecido 60 pacientes (49,6%); la mortalidad fue mayor con el implante intraparada que con el implante en circulación espontánea (30 [71,4%] de 42 frente a 30 [38,0%] de 79; p=0,030). Se asociaron de manera independiente con la mortalidad a 30 días la alanina aminotransferasa (ALT) antes del implante y el lactato (tanto basal como a las 6 h y el aclaramiento). Los modelos de regresión que incluían el lactato presentaron mejor capacidad predictiva de la supervivencia que las puntuaciones ENCOURAGE y ECMO-ACCEPTS, con mayor área bajo la curva ROC en el modelo con lactato a las 6 h.Conclusiones: El lactato (basal y a las 6 h y el aclaramiento) es un predictor independiente para el pronóstico de los pacientes en shock cardiogénico asistidos con ECMO-VA que facilita una mejor estratificación del riesgo y tiene una capacidad predictiva superior (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Lactate and its evolution are associated with the prognosis of patients in shock, although there is little evidence in those assisted with an extracorporeal venoarterial oxygenation membrane (VA-ECMO). Our objective was to evaluate its prognostic value in cardiogenic shock assisted with VA-ECMO. Methods: Study of patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO for medical indication between July 2013 and April 2021. Lactate clearance was calculated: [(initial lactate − 6 h lactate) / initial lactate × exact time between both determinations]. Results: From 121 patients, 44 had acute myocardial infarction (36.4%), 42 implant during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (34.7%), 14 pulmonary embolism (11.6%), 14 arrhythmic storm (11.6%), and 6 fulminant myocarditis (5.0%). After 30 days, 60 patients (49.6%) died, mortality was higher for implant during cardiopulmonary resuscitation than for implant in spontaneous circulation (30 of 42 [71.4%] vs 30 of 79 [38.0%], P=.030). Preimplantation GPT and lactate (both baseline, at 6hours, and clearance) were independently associated with 30-day mortality. The regression models that included lactate clearance had a better predictive capacity for survival than the ENCOURAGE and ECMO-ACCEPTS scores, with the area under the ROC curve being greater in the model with lactate at 6 h. Conclusions: Lactate (at baseline, 6h, and clearance) is an independent predictor of prognosis in patients in cardiogenic shock supported by VA-ECMO, allowing better risk stratification and predictive capacity (AU)

Dispositivos de asistencia ventricular en el shock cardiogénico posinfarto: importancia del soporte hemodinámico: reporte de caso / Ventricular assist devices in post-infarction cardiogenic shock: importance of hemodynamic support: case report / Dispositivos de assistência ventricular no choque cardiogênico pós-infarto: importância do suporte hemodinâmico: relato de caso

El shock cardiogénico posinfarto caracterizado por un estado de insuficiencia circulatoria sistémica requiere de un tratamiento precoz en vistas a restablecer la estabilidad hemodinámica y la función ventricular. Este consta de la reperfusión coronaria mediante revascularización miocárdica; en algunos casos es necesaria la utilización de dispositivos de asistencia ventricular. El ECMO venoarterial es un sistema de circulación extracorpórea que permite un soporte biventricular oxigenando la sangre y reintroduciéndola mediante un flujo continuo hacia la circulación arterial sistémica. El uso de dicho dispositivo en pacientes con shock cardiogénico ha mostrado una mejoría significativa de la sobrevida a 30 días en comparación con el uso del balón de contrapulsación intraaórtico. No obstante, sus potenciales complicaciones, como dificultad en el vaciamiento ventricular izquierdo, síndrome de Arlequín, sangrados e infecciones, hacen fundamental la formación y el trabajo en equipo del heart team. Un porcentaje no menor de estos pacientes presentarán una severa disfunción ventricular permanente, por lo que podrían ser candidatos a dispositivos de asistencia ventricular izquierda de larga duración tipo Heartmate III como puente al trasplante cardíaco, el cual ha mostrado resultados satisfactorios con una excelente sobrevida a mediano plazo.

Post-infarction cardiogenic shock characterized by a state of systemic circulatory failure requires early treatment in order to restore hemodynamic stability and ventricular function. This consists of coronary reperfusion through myocardial revascularization, requiring in some cases the use of ventricular assist devices. Veno-arterial ECMO is an extracorporeal circulation system that allows biventricular support by oxygenating the blood and reintroducing it through a continuous flow towards the systemic arterial circulation. The use of this device in patients with cardiogenic shock has shown a significant improvement in survival at 30 days compared to the use of intra-aortic balloon pump. However, its potential complications, such as difficulty in left ventricular emptying, Harlequin syndrome, bleeding and infections, make the training and teamwork of the heart team essential. A great percentage of these patients will present a severe permanent ventricular dysfunction, so they could be candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support devices like Heartmate III as a bridge to transplant or myocardial recovery, or destination therapy, which has shown satisfactory results with excellent medium-term survival.

O choque cardiogênico pós-infarto caracterizado por um estado de insuficiência circulatória sistêmica requer tratamento precoce para restabelecer a estabilidade hemodinâmica e a função ventricular. Esta consiste na reperfusão coronariana por meio de revascularização miocárdica, necessitando, em alguns casos, do uso de dispositivos de assistência ventricular. A ECMO venoarterial é um sistema de circulação extracorpórea que permite o suporte biventricular oxigenando o sangue e reintroduzindo-o através de um fluxo contínuo para a circulação arterial sistêmica. O uso desse dispositivo em pacientes com choque cardiogênico mostrou melhora significativa na sobrevida em 30 dias em relação ao uso de contrapulsação com balão intra-aórtico. No entanto, suas potenciais complicações, como dificuldade de esvaziamento ventricular esquerdo, síndrome de Harlequin, sangramentos e infecções, tornam imprescindível o treinamento e o trabalho em equipe do time do coração. Não uma pequena porcentagem desses pacientes apresentará uma condição ventricular permanente grave, podendo ser candidatos a dispositivos de assistência ventricular esquerda de longa duração do tipo Heartmate III como ponte para o transplante cardíaco, que tem demonstrado resultados satisfatórios com excelente sobrevida em médio prazo.