Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años / Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years

Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)

Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)

Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años / Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years

Introducción Las caídas deterioran la calidad de vida de los ancianos y el miedo a estas ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente para fragilidad, por lo que es prioritario disponer de herramientas para su evaluación. La escala ShortFalls Efficacy Scale-International (FES)-I, versión corta (siete ítems) de la escala FES-I (16 ítems), evalúa el miedo a caer (MC). El objetivo de este estudio es validar la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años y analizar la relación entre el miedo a las caídas, el riesgo de las mismas y la fragilidad. Material y métodos Se trata de un estudio observacional transversal. La muestra consistió en 227 sujetos (50,7% varones; edad media 75,8 años). La ubicación fue en el norte de España. Las variables empleadas fueron sociodemográficas, clínicas, pruebas de ejecución Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) y Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), FES-I y Short FES-I. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas: validez y fiabilidad. Resultados La escala Short FES-I muestra excelentes consistencia interna (alfa de Cronbach = 0,90, coeficiente correlación intraclase = 0,89) y reproducibilidad test-retest (Rho Spearman = 0,76). Tiene una elevada validez de criterio concomitante analizada por su correlación con FES-I (Rho Spearman = 0,90). La validez de constructo discriminante ha sido confirmada tanto para SPPB como TUG. Short FES-I presenta buena capacidad de clasificación de fragilidad (definida por SPPB) con área bajo la curva [AUC] = 0,715; como punto de corte se propone un valor Short FES-I>8 para miedo moderado/alto de caídas. Conclusiones La escala Short FES-I es un buen instrumento para estudiar el miedo a las caídas en población española mayor de 70 años y es válida para su uso clínico y en investigación. (AU)

Introduction Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. Material and methods Cross-sectional observational study. Sample: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). Setting: northern Spain. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. Results The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test–retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. Conclusions The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use. (AU)

[Validation of the short FES-I scale in Spanish population over 70 years]. / Validación de la escala Short FES-I en población española mayor de 70 años.

INTRODUCTION: Falls deteriorate the quality of life of the elderly and the fear of falling has been shown to be an independent risk factor for frailty, so having tools for its evaluation is a priority. The short FES-I scale, short version (7 items) of the FES-I scale (16 items), assesses fear of falling. The objective of this study is to validate the short FES-I scale in the Spanish population over 70 years and to analyze the relationship between fear of falling, risk of falls and frailty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. SAMPLE: 227 subjects (50.7% male; mean age 75.8 years). SETTING: northern Spain. VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, short physical performance battery (SPPB) and timed up and go test (TUG) execution tests, FES-I and short FES-I. Analysis of psychometric properties: validity and reliability. RESULTS: The short FES-I scale shows excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (rho Spearman = 0.76). It has a high concomitant criterion validity analyzed by its correlation with FES-I (rho Spearman = 0.90). The discriminant construct validity has been confirmed for both SPPB and TUG. Short FES-I presents good capacity for frailty classification (defined by SPPB) with AUC = 0.715. As a cut-off point, a short FES-I value > 8 is proposed for moderate/high fear of falling. CONCLUSIONS: The short FES-I scale is a good instrument to study fear of falling in the Spanish population over 70 years and is valid for clinical and research use.

Modified Timed Up and Go Test for Tendency to Fall and Balance Assessment in Elderly Patients With Gait Instability.

Objective: To compare the results from the modified Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) with posturographic variables, the subjective perception of disability due to gait instability, and the number of falls in a sample of the elderly population with imbalance, to confirm that the TUG Test is a useful clinical instrument to assess the tendency to fall in individuals of this age group. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary university hospital, in 174 people aged 65 years or older with gait instability. Modified TUG Test was performed; time, step count and the need for support during the test were the analyzed variables. They were compared with the number of falls, Computerized Dynamic Posturography scores, and questionnaires scores (Dizziness Handicap Inventory and a shortened version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International). Results: The average time to complete the TUG Test was 21.24 ± 8.18 s, and the average step count was 27.36 ± 7.93. One hundred two patients (58.6%) required no support to complete the test, whereas the other 72 (41.4%) used supports. The time taken to complete the Test was significantly related with having or not having fallen in the previous year, with the scores of the questionnaires, and with various parameters of dynamic posturography. A higher percentage of patients who took more than 15 s had fallen in the previous year than those who took up to 15 s to complete the test [P = 0.012; OR = 2.378; 95% CI (1.183, 4.780)]. No significant correlation was found between the step count and the number of falls in the previous year, with falling during the test or not, or with being a single or a frequent faller. No relation was found between the need for supports and the number of falls, with having or not having fallen in the previous year, or with being a single or frequent faller. Conclusion: The modified TUG Test is in relation with the presence or absence of falls. Time is the essential parameter for analyzing the risk of falling and the 15-s threshold is a good value to differentiate elderly patients at high risk of falling. Unique Identifier: NCT03034655, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Reliability and Validity of the Short Falls Efficacy Scale International in English, Mandarin, and Bahasa Malaysia in Malaysia.

While the prevalence of falls among Malaysian older adults is comparable to other older populations around the world, little is currently known about fear of falling in Malaysia. The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) and short FES-I scales to measure fear of falling have not yet been validated for use within the Malaysian population, and are currently not available in Bahasa Malaysia (BM). A total of 402 participants aged ≥63 years were recruited. The questionnaire was readministered to 149 participants, 4 to 8 weeks after the first administration to determine test-retest reliability. The original version of the 7-item short FES-I is available in English, while the Mandarin was adapted from the 16-item Mandarin FES-I. The BM version was translated according to protocol by four experts. The internal structure of the FES-I was examined by factor analysis. The 7-item short FES-I showed good internal reliability and test-retest reliability for English, Mandarin, and BM versions for Malaysia.

Is there a relationship between short FES-I test scores and objective assessment of balance in the older people with age-induced instability?

Fear of falling (FOF) is a common problem among the elderly. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether there is a correlation between FOF, estimated via the short FES-I test, and objective evaluation of balance in a group of elderly patients with age-related instability. The balance of 139 subjects of more than 65 years of age is evaluated by the timed up and go test and the computerised dynamic posturography (CDP). Different groups of elderly patients were established according to the number of falls in the previous 12 months, and the correlation with short FES-I test scores was evaluated. Based on the results, ROC curves were calculated. The short FES-I test presents a good capacity to distinguish between subjects with ≤ 3 falls/year and subjects with ≥ 4 falls/year (AUC 0.719, 95%CI 0.627-0.810). A test score of 14.5 is the best cut-off point (74% sensitivity, 51% specificity). Using this cut-off point, the study sample comprises two groups: subjects with test scores of 7-14 vs 15-28, with the first group obtaining best results with statistical significance (Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney test) in most of the balance tests. The short FES-I is an excellent instrument that measures FOF in the elderly, and it is correlated with their number of falls both in real life and on the CDP. It is simple and fast, and so can be considered an extraordinary screening test relative to real risk of falls in the elderly.

Impact of obesity in elderly patients with postural instability.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to assess whether obesity affects balance in elderly patients with postural instability. STUDY DESIGN: It is a case-control study, with cases defined by BMI ≥30 kg/m(2), and developed in a third level university hospital. METHODS: We included 135 patients aged 65 years old or more who presented postural instability. Balance assessment was through the sensory organisation test (SOT), limits of stability (LOS) and rhythmic weight shift (RWS) of computerised dynamic posturography (CDP) and the modified timed up-and-go (TUG) test. The patients also completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory and short Falls Efficacy Scale-International questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients with obesity took longer to perform the modified TUG and required more steps. Also these patients had poorer scores in the subjective tests. In the CDP there were no significant differences in the SOT nor the LOS, and only there was a statistical significant difference in the anterior-posterior directional control of the RWS. Obese patients have a higher risk of fallings compared to non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: In essence, our results indicate that obesity interferes in the balance of elderly patients with postural instability, putting them at a greater risk of fallings, performing worse dynamic tasks and feeling more disabled. Although continued education on training balance may be useful in older population, since the obese group shows more rate of fallers, rehabilitation programmes focus on dynamic tasks in these patients could be useful to reduce their fall risk and improve their quality of life.

Can we predict the risk of falls in elderly patients with instability?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine whether clinical and instrumental examination of balance can predict the risk of falls in elderly patients with instability. STUDY DESIGN: It is a case control study, with cases defined by falls in the last year, developed in a third level university hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy patients aged 65 years or more who met at least one of the following inclusion criteria: (a) at least one fall in the last year; (b) spend more than 15s during the timed up and go test (TUG); (c) a score of less than 68% average balance in the sensory organisation test (SOT) of the computerised dynamic posturography (CDP); or (d) at least one fall in the CDP-SOT. INTERVENTION: TUG test, CDP-SOT, CDP centre of gravity balancing (CG) and limits of stability (LOS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) test and short FES-I test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of steps and time (TUG), average balance and use of sensorial information (CDP-SOT), speed and directional control (CDP-CG and LOS), DHI score and short FES-I score. RESULTS: Comparing subjects without falls (non-fallers) vs subjects with at least one fall (fallers) in the last year, fallers obtain worse scores than non-fallers in condition 2 (p=0.043) and use of somatosensory information (p=0.039). Comparing subjects with five falls or less (non-multiple-fallers) vs subjects with more than five falls (multiple-fallers), multiple-fallers obtain worse scores than non-multiple-fallers in overall balance (p=0.023), condition 6 (p=0.036), directional control (swaying (p=0.006) and LOS (p=0.023)) and short FES-I score (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: The three most useful parameters for identifying unstable elderly patients at particularly high risk of repeated falls are mean balance in the CDP SOT, directional control of CDP LOS and short FES-I score.