Postoperative pain in a prospectively assessed surgical short-stay cohort: A subgroup analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is sparse information about postoperative pain after short stay surgery. We explored the incidence of immediate postoperative pain and its relationship with persistent pain or opioid use 2 weeks after surgery. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of prospective and controlled data from adult patients (n = 931) who underwent short-stay surgery in a tertiary care hospital. Data comprised patient demographics, surgical category, pain scores and analgesic management during the recovery unit stay, before discharge on the postoperative morning after surgery and again 2 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Half of the patients had severe dynamic pain in the recovery unit. It was commonest after orthopaedic (70% of patients), followed by gynaecological (54%), gastrointestinal (51%) and spine surgery (49%). Multimodal pain management was used for most patients (n = 811, 87%) with opioid use predominant. The median oxycodone dose during short-stay was the highest after orthopaedic surgery (39 mg). The first individual dynamic pain score after surgery was associated with follow-up pain score at rest (OR = 1.37), dynamic pain (OR = 1.35) and pain interference (OR = 1.34) at 2 weeks after surgery. Maximum dynamic pain reported in the recovery unit was associated with pain at rest (OR = 1.56), dynamic pain (OR = 1.65) and pain interference (OR = 1.45) at 2 weeks after surgery. Pain scores at 2 weeks were highest and analgesic use greatest in those patients who underwent spinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intense postoperative pain remains common after short-stay surgery in some surgical categories including orthopaedic surgery and is associated with a greater likelihood of pain at 2 weeks.

Patient functional recovery after a 23-h surgery - a prospective, follow-up study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated patients' functional outcomes 2 weeks after a 23-h surgery model in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: This prospective study comprised data on 993 consecutive adult patients who underwent a 23-h surgery. Patients were interviewed before surgery and at 14 days after surgery by telephone with a multidimensional structural survey including closed- and open-ended questions. Regarding functional outcomes, the patients were asked to assess their general wellbeing, energy levels and activities of daily living on a 5-point numeric rating scale (1 = poor to 5 = excellent). Data on patient characteristics, medical history, alcohol use, smoking status and pre-, peri- and postoperative pain and satisfaction with the care received were collected and analysed to determine whether these factors contributed to their recovery. The primary outcome measure was patient functional recovery at 14 days after surgery. RESULTS: Most patients reported moderate to excellent functional outcomes: 93.6% (95% CI, 92.1--95.1) of the patients showed a score ≥ 3 on the 5-point numeric scale. One out of four patients (23%) scored all three domains as excellent. A weak inverse correlation was noted between functional recovery and most pain in the 23-h postanaesthesia care unit as well as pain at 2 weeks after surgery. A weak positive correlation was noted between functional recovery and patient satisfaction with the instructions at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients showed ample functional recovery at 14 days after the 23-h surgery. Higher pain scores in the postanaesthesia care unit and 2 weeks after surgery predicted poor functional outcomes, and satisfaction with postoperative counselling predicted better outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04142203.

Modelo para el perfeccionamiento del proceso de atención en cirugía mayor ambulatoria y de corta estadía / A Model for Improving the Care Process in Major Outpatient and Short-Stay Surgeries

Introducción: Existen limitaciones en la coordinación entre los niveles primario y secundario de salud en el proceso quirúrgico ambulatorio y de corta estadía, lo que repercute en la calidad del servicio. Objetivo: Diseñar una propuesta de modelo asistencial para el perfeccionamiento del proceso de atención al paciente en cirugía mayor ambulatoria y cirugía de corta estadía. Métodos: Se desarrolló una investigación prospectiva descriptiva del 3 de septiembre de 2012 al 20 de marzo de 2018. En su diseño fueron empleados la modelación y el sistémico-estructural fundamentalmente. Se aplicaron encuestas a expertos con experiencia en los niveles primario y secundario de salud para evaluar la calidad y pertinencia del modelo propuesto. También fueron encuestados los jefes de los grupos provinciales de Cirugía General y Medicina Familiar. Se realizaron entrevistas grupales a clientes del proyecto de investigación (del que se deriva) y a decisores institucionales y del nivel provincial. Fue empleada la técnica de triangulación metodológica y de fuentes. Resultados: La estructuración del modelo partió de la coordinación del trabajo asistencial y metodológico entre los niveles primario y secundario de salud. Se sustentó en cuatro pilares: preparación teórica del personal de salud, observancia de normas de relación en el contexto laboral, cumplimiento de procedimientos en el contexto asistencial y evaluación continua de la calidad asistencial. Los expertos, clientes y decisores avalaron su calidad, pertinencia y posibilidades de implementación. Conclusiones: El modelo presenta calidad, es pertinente y su aplicación es factible(AU)

Introduction: There are limitations in the coordination between the primary and secondary health levels in the outpatient and short-stay surgical processes, which affects the quality of the service. Objective: Designing a proposal for a healthcare model for the improvement of the patient care process in major outpatient surgery and short-stay surgery. Methods: A descriptive and prospective research was carried out from September 3, 2012 to March 20, 2018. Its design involved essentially modeling and the systemic-structural method. Surveys were applied to experts with experience in primary and secondary health levels, in order to assess the quality and relevance of the proposed model. The heads of the provincial groups of General Surgery and Family Medicine were also surveyed. Group interviews were conducted with clients of the research project (from which it is derived) and with institutional and provincial decision-makers. The methodological and source triangulation technique was used. Results: The structuring of the model started from the coordination of the care and methodological work between the primary and secondary health levels. It was based on four pillars: theoretical training of health personnel, observance of relationship rules in the work context, compliance with procedures in the care context, and continuous assessment of the quality of care. The experts, clients and decision-makers recognized its quality, relevance and possibilities of implementation. Conclusions: The model presents quality, is pertinent and its application is feasible(AU)

Waiting time for short-stay surgery in a paediatric surgery department.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the waiting time (WT) for a short-stay surgery and determine its possible determinant factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Paediatric Surgery at the National Hospital of Lamordé of Niamey, Niger. It included patients aged 0-15 years who benefitted from a short-stay surgery (24-48 h of hospitalisation) during a period of 19 months (1st January 2017 - 31st July 2018). Patient, diagnosis and surgical treatment data were gathered. WT was the time elapsed between the indication of a surgical operation and its realisation. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used with a threshold statistical significance of < 0.05. RESULTS: Short-stay surgery constituted 25.4% of all operating activities (n = 271). Inguinal or inguinoscrotal hernia was the most frequent pathology at 31.38% (n = 85). The mean WT was of 116.6 days (range: 4-491 days) and the median was 114 days. WT was greater than or equal to 3 months for 63.9% of the patients (n = 173). Based on pathology, the mean WT varied between 57.5 days (ovarian hernia) and 163.6 days (5.8 months) for epigastric hernia. A significantly longer WT was observed with the presence of a comorbidity (P = 0.0352) but was not associated with patient residence (P = 0.0951). CONCLUSION: A long WT for a short-stay surgery should be improved upon by different interventions with respect to the supply and demand of care and the setting of priorities.

Shortening Postoperative Stay after Parathyroidectomy - A District General Hospital Experience

Abstract Introduction Historically, concerns about complications following parathyroid surgery, such as airway compromise, bleeding and hypocalcemia, have precluded its consideration as a short-stay surgical procedure. Recent advancements in perioperative care have resulted in several publications demonstrating that parathyroidectomy can be safely performed as a short-stay procedure. Objectives The aim of the present study was to describe the process of implementing a short-stay protocol focusing on preoperative patient education and postoperative calcium management for those undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). Method A retrospective audit of consecutive parathyroidectomies performed for PHP over the period between 2010 and 2013 was performed. A short-stay protocol (SSP) was introduced focusing on postoperative calcium management. Results were reaudited over the period between 2013 and 2015. Results Consecutive parathyroidectomies in 76 patients were included in the study. A total of 42 patients underwent parathyroidectomy prior to the introduction of the protocol. A total of 26.2% of these patients were symptomatic from hypercalcemia. A total of 40 out of 42 (95.2%) patients had a biochemical cure. A total of 36 out of 42 (85.7%) cases were due to parathyroid adenomas. A total of 34 patients underwent surgery following the introduction of the protocol. A total of 13 out of 34 (38.2%) of the patients had symptomatic hypercalcemia. A total of 33 out of 34 (97.1%) had a biochemical cure. A total of 32 out of 34 (94.1%) cases were due to parathyroid adenomas. The length of stay decreased from a median of 3 days (range 2-9 days; mean 3.32) preprotocol to a median of 2 days (range 2-3 days; mean 2.16) postprotocol (p< 0.0001) with no difference in the 30-day unplanned readmission rate (4.8 versus 2.9%; p= 0.999). Conclusions The postoperative length of stay after parathyroidectomy for PHP can be safely reduced through patient education and by rationalizing postoperative calcium management without adversely affecting outcomes.

Shortening Postoperative Stay after Parathyroidectomy - A District General Hospital Experience.

Introduction Historically, concerns about complications following parathyroid surgery, such as airway compromise, bleeding and hypocalcemia, have precluded its consideration as a short-stay surgical procedure. Recent advancements in perioperative care have resulted in several publications demonstrating that parathyroidectomy can be safely performed as a short-stay procedure. Objectives The aim of the present study was to describe the process of implementing a short-stay protocol focusing on preoperative patient education and postoperative calcium management for those undergoing surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). Method A retrospective audit of consecutive parathyroidectomies performed for PHP over the period between 2010 and 2013 was performed. A short-stay protocol (SSP) was introduced focusing on postoperative calcium management. Results were reaudited over the period between 2013 and 2015. Results Consecutive parathyroidectomies in 76 patients were included in the study. A total of 42 patients underwent parathyroidectomy prior to the introduction of the protocol. A total of 26.2% of these patients were symptomatic from hypercalcemia. A total of 40 out of 42 (95.2%) patients had a biochemical cure. A total of 36 out of 42 (85.7%) cases were due to parathyroid adenomas. A total of 34 patients underwent surgery following the introduction of the protocol. A total of 13 out of 34 (38.2%) of the patients had symptomatic hypercalcemia. A total of 33 out of 34 (97.1%) had a biochemical cure. A total of 32 out of 34 (94.1%) cases were due to parathyroid adenomas. The length of stay decreased from a median of 3 days (range 2-9 days; mean 3.32) preprotocol to a median of 2 days (range 2-3 days; mean 2.16) postprotocol ( p < 0.0001) with no difference in the 30-day unplanned readmission rate (4.8 versus 2.9%; p = 0.999). Conclusions The postoperative length of stay after parathyroidectomy for PHP can be safely reduced through patient education and by rationalizing postoperative calcium management without adversely affecting outcomes.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Technique for Spigelian Hernia in an Outpatient and Short-Stay Surgery Unit: What's New in Intraperitoneal Meshes?

BACKGROUND: Spigelian hernia (SH) is a rare entity, but its surgical treatment is essential because of its high complication risk. Laparoscopic approaches have become the option in elective surgery because it has less morbidity and requires a shorter stay. Several laparoscopic techniques have been employed, but there is no gold standard technique for this kind of hernia. We report, in this study, our experience with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent elective surgery for SH between 2008 and 2015 in a Short-Stay Surgical Unit. Laparoscopic IPOM technique was performed in all patients. The technique, epidemiological data, operative findings, hospital stay, morbidity, and follow-up are presented. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8 males) with a median age of 57 years were operated on. They commonly presented an abdominal mass in the flank (73.3%). Computed tomography was necessary in 4 patients to complete preoperative diagnosis. The mean operating time was 43 minutes. No closure of the defect was associated and we employed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-coated and polyvinylidene fluoride-coated polypropylene meshes. There were no postoperative complications and early discharge was possible in all cases. No recurrences or complications related to the mesh have been detected so far, with a median follow-up of 4 years (1-8). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows IPOM laparoscopic SH repair is a safe and effective technique with advantages that allow us to recommend it as the most advisable for SH treatment in Short-Stay Surgical Units. However, current controversies in the use of intraperitoneal meshes must be clarified.

Early discharge in the bariatric population does not increase post-discharge resource utilization.

INTRODUCTION: There is a trend toward shorter-stay bariatric surgery. However, reducing LOS may increase complications and post-discharge resource utilization. Our goal was to compare outcomes before and after implementation of short-stay bariatric surgery. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective chart review of a single-surgeon series of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB). The two cohorts "target discharge POD 1" and "target discharge POD 2" were analyzed for on time discharges (feasibility) and complications. Patients who were successfully discharged in each cohort were further analyzed for post-discharge resource utilization. RESULTS: Early discharge was initiated in November of 2014 with 107 patients identified in this group. An additional 107 patients from those immediately preceding represented the target DC POD 2 group. The target DC POD 2 patients had a significantly higher percentage of patients who met their target LOS. The SD group (overall and LRYGB) had a significantly higher rate of hospital readmissions; this was the only significant difference in primary outcomes between the two groups. There was no difference in mortality, leaks or reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that short-stay bariatric surgery is feasible and safe. Reducing the LOS from 2 to 1 day did not significantly increase the rate of hospital readmissions, ED visits or patient calls to our office. Further research is necessary to determine whether LOS can be further abbreviated to allow outpatient LSG and LRYGB.

Standardized Discharge Information After Short-Stay Hysterectomy and Relationships With Self-Care Confidence, Perceived Recovery, and Satisfaction.

We report on the development and investigation of standardized, nurse-delivered discharge information to women after same-day hysterectomy, including the relationships among discharge information, self-care confidence, perceived recovery, and satisfaction. Fifty-one women reported high levels of self-care confidence and various levels of perceived recovery 48 to 72 hours after surgery. They were satisfied to highly satisfied with their experiences and with the discharge information provided. The important role of standardized patient discharge information is highlighted.

Shorter than 24-h hospital stay for sleeve gastrectomy is safe and feasible.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. Short-stay procedures have gained popularity in many surgical sub-specialties. Main benefits are early discharge, minimal loss of productivity, cost reductions, and a reduced risk of infections. Such procedures can be undertaken if the patient's safety is not jeopardized. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has consolidated itself as a primary bariatric technique. One matter of discussion relates to its associated quick postoperative recovery, as debate rages over whether there are patient benefits to hospital stays beyond 24 h. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of short-stay LSG. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive, retrospective analysis of a consecutive series. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data collected on hospital stays, readmission rates, early and midterm major complications, and re-intervention rates on 2629 primary LSG performed between February 2007 and August 2014. RESULTS: Out of 2629 patients, 2590 (98.52 %) were discharged within the first 24 h. Thirty-nine (1.48 %) required a longer admission: 16 (0.61 %) for vomiting and 23 (0.87 %) for bleeding, 5 (0.19 %) of whom required a second procedure within those first 24 h. Four patients (0.15 %) were readmitted for dehydration between day 2 and 4. A total of 26 leaks (0.99 %) occurred between postoperative days 6 and 41. Ten intra-abdominal hematomas (0.38 %) were diagnosed after the 7th postoperative day, and seven patients (0.27 %) required percutaneous drainage. Five abdominal collections (0.19 %), unrelated to either fistulas or bleeding, were diagnosed between day 6 and 16. No major complications occurred on postoperative days 2 through 5. CONCLUSIONS: Our evidence suggests that hospital stays after LSG beyond 24 h are unnecessary in patients with no persistent vomiting or signs of bleeding or leaks; major complications generally present either within the first 24 h or after the fifth postoperative day.

The anesthesia study of minimally-invasive thyroid surgery with short-stay discharge / 中华内分泌外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the feasibility,security and efficiency of general anaesthesia compared with regional anaesthesia for minimally-invasive thyroid surgery(MITS)with short-stay discharge.Methods 103 cases undergoing MITS with short-stay discharge from Jan.2013 to Jun.2013 in Fuzhou General Hospital were collected.54 patients were operated under regional anaesthesia and 49 under general anaesthesia.All variables of patients including demographic characteristics,vital signs (blood pressure,heart rate,blood glucose) during the operation,duration and type of operation,postoperative complications,difficulty in airway management and anesthesia consumption were recorded and analyzed.Results There was no difference in respect to level of blood glucose,length of hospital stay,discharge time,patient or operator satisfaction rate,anesthesia or operation complications rate between the two groups.Blood pressure (T1:(90 ± 7.0) vs (79 ± 8.3) mmHg,T2:(88 ± 6.8) vs (80 ±7.6) mmHg,P ＜0.05) and heart rate(T1:(130 ± 18.2) vs(101 ± 12.0)/min,T2:(120 ± 19.7) vs(103 ± 13.3)/min,P ＜ 0.05)level were higher,while the recovery time of anesthesia((0.3 ± 0.14)vs(0.8 ± 0.35)h,P ＜ 0.05)) and anesthesia consumption ((1350 ± 78) vs (2580 ± 220) yuan,P ＜ 0.05)) were lower in the regional anaesthesia group compared with those in the general anaesthesia group.Conclusions Both general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia for MITS with short-stay discharge are safe and effective.General anesthesia has less psychological trauma,while regional anaesthesia has shorter recovery time and lower anesthetic consumption.

Cirugía de corta estancia en sábados, domingos y días festivos, experiencia en el Servicio de Cirugía General del Hospital General de México, O.D / Short stay surgery on weekends and holidays, experience at the General Surgery Service of the General Hospital of Mexico, O.D

Objetivo: Demostrar las bondades del impacto, tiempo y costo-eficacia de la cirugía de corta estancia en sábados, domingos y días festivos. Sede: Hospital General de México. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo, transversal, observacional, comparativo. Análisis estadístico: Prueba t de Student, chi cuadrada y análisis costo-eficacia. Material y método: Durante 4 años se realizaron 1,200 cirugías dentro de este programa piloto, utilizando la capacidad hospitalaria instalada y al mismo personal contratado para la atención médica de dichos días, sin contar con una unidad de cirugía de corta estancia como tal. Los procedimientos realizados fueron: plastía inguinal, resección de enfermedad pilonidal, plastía umbilical, resección de tumor benigno de partes blandas, plastía de pared, mastectomía subcutánea, hemorroidectomía, fistulectomía y excisión de tumores benignos mamarios y se comparó con los mismos procedimientos, pero realizados en forma de cirugía programada, evaluando y comparando las siguientes variables: edad, género, procedimiento realizado, tiempo de estancia hospitalaria y costo-beneficio del procedimiento. También se evaluó necesidad de hospitalización, reingreso en menos de 24 h, morbilidad y mortalidad. Resultados: Los diagnósticos incluyeron: hernias inguinales con 486 casos, tumores de partes blandas en 359 casos, hernia umbilical en 185 casos, eventración en 88 casos, enfermedad anorrectal en 27 casos, enfermedad pilonidal en 17 casos, ginecomastia en 17 casos, fimosis en 10 y otros en 11. Se realizaron plastía inguinal, resección de enfermedad pilonidal, plastía umbilical, excisión de tumor benigno de partes blandas, plastía de pared, mastectomía subcutánea, hemorroidectomía y/o fistulectomía, circuncisión y otros. El tiempo empleado para el manejo quirúrgico se redujo de 36 horas en promedio a doce horas (p < 0.05). El costo-eficacia fue del 40% menor en comparación con los pacientes que se operaron con el método tradicional. El promedio de tiempo quirúrgico y anestésico no fue diferente entre cirugía ambulatoria y el método tradicional. Conclusión: Se puede realizar con gran eficiencia cirugía de corta estancia en sábados domingos y días festivos con un ahorro de 40%.

Objective: To demonstrate the benefits of the impact, time, and cost-effectiveness of short stay surgery performed on weekends and holidays. Setting: General Hospital of Mexico (Third level health care hospital). Design: Prospective, cross-sectional, observational, and comparative study. Statistical analysis: Student's t test, chi square, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Material and method: During 4 years, 1,200 surgeries were performed within this pilot program, using the installed hospital infrastructure and the same personnel employed for medical care in those days, without having a special short stay surgery unit as such. Performed procedures were: inguinal plasty, resection of pilonidal disease, umbilical plasty, resection of benign soft tissue tumor, wall plasty, subcutaneous mastectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, fistulectomy, and excision of benign breast tumors, these were compared with the same procedures but performed as programmed surgeries. We assessed and compared the following variables: age, gender, performed procedure, time of hospital stay, and cost-benefit of the procedure. We also evaluated the need of hospitalization, re-admittance in less than 24 h, morbidity and mortality. Results: Diagnoses included: inguinal hernias with 486 cases, 359 cases of soft tissue tumors, 185 cases of umbilical hernia, 88 cases of eventration, 22 cases of anorectal disease, 17 cases of pilonidal disease, 17 cases of gynecomastia, 10 cases of phimosis, and 11 other diagnoses. We performed inguinal plasties, resection of pilonidal disease, umbilical plasty, excision of soft tissue tumor, wall plasty, subcutaneous mastectomy, hemorrhoidectomy and/or fistulectomy, circumcision and other procedures. The time used for surgical management was reduced from an average of 36 to 12 hours (p < 0.05). Cost-effectiveness was 40% lower as compared with the traditional method. Surgical and anesthetic times were not different between ambulatory and traditional surgeries. Conclusion: Short stay surgery can be performed efficiently on the weekends and holydays with a 40% savings.