Exploring the interplay of psychiatric symptoms, antipsychotic medications, side effects, employment status, and quality of life in Chronic Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Many factors contribute to quality of life (QoL) in patients with schizophrenia, yet limited research examined these factors in patients in China. This cross-sectional study explores subjective QoL and its associated factors in patients. METHODS: The QoL was assessed using the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS). Clinical symptoms were evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and seven factors were extracted. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) were used to assess depression and anxiety. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8). The Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS) and Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side Effects (RSESE) were used to evaluate the side effects of medications. RESULTS: We recruited 270 patients (male:142,52.6%, mean age:41.9 ± 9.4 years). Positive correlations were observed between SQLS and its subdomains with the total score of BPRS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, AD8, TESS, and RSESE (all P < 0.005). Patients who were taking activating second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) had lower scores on total SQLS, Motivation/ Energy domain of SQLS (SQLS-ME) as well as Symptoms/ Side effects domain of SQLS (SQLS-SS) compared to those taking non-activating SGAs (all P < 0.005). Multiple regression analysis showed that depressive/ anxiety symptoms and cognitive impairment had significant negative effects on QoL (P ≤ 0.001), while activating SGAs had a positive effect (P < 0.005). Blunted affect and unemployment were inversely associated with the motivation/energy domain (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the important role of depression/anxiety symptoms and cognitive impairment in the QoL of patients with chronic schizophrenia. Activating SGAs and employment may improve the QoL of these individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered at chictr.org.cn (Identifier: ChiCTR2100043537).

No pain, no gain revisited: the impact of positive and negative psychotherapy experiences on treatment outcome.

Objective: Psychotherapy may have many benefits for patients with mental health problems, but patients may also have negative experiences related to the therapy. Not much is known about these negative psychotherapy experiences and their impact on treatment outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the association between positive and negative psychotherapy experiences and treatment outcome. Methods: A total of 130 patients participated in the study. They received treatment as usual and were assessed for positive and negative psychotherapy experiences at mid-treatment and post-treatment using the Positive and Negative Experiences of Psychotherapy Questionnaire (PNEP). Treatment outcome was measured by the Outcome Questionnaire - 45 (OQ-45). Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the data. Results: All patients reported positive psychotherapy experiences at mid-treatment. At least one negative experience was reported by 69% of participants. After correction for baseline severity (i.e., OQ-45 at baseline) and relevant demographic variables, positive psychotherapy experiences at mid-treatment emerged as a predictor for treatment outcome. In contrast, negative psychotherapy experiences did not predict treatment outcome. However, reporting more negative experiences was associated with reporting fewer positive experiences at mid- and end of treatment. Conclusion: Both positive and negative psychotherapy experiences commonly occur. Although in this study negative psychotherapy experiences did not predict treatment outcome in terms of symptom reduction, the findings do suggest that negative experiences may influence the way in which patients evaluate their treatment. Although positive experiences outweigh negative experiences, patients should be informed that negative experiences may also occur.

Assessment of centanafadine in adults with ADHD: a matching adjusted indirect comparison versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (Concerta).

OBJECTIVE: To compare safety and efficacy of centanafadine versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (ER; Concerta) in adults with ADHD. METHODS: Without head-to-head trials, anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) of adverse event rates reported across trials and mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER were conducted. Pooled patient-level data from two centanafadine trials (NCT03605680/NCT03605836) and aggregate data from one published methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial (NCT00937040) were used. Characteristics of individual patients from the centanafadine trials were matched to aggregate baseline characteristics from the methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial using propensity score weighting. A sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the results to the capping of extreme weights (i.e. >99th percentile). RESULTS: Compared with methylphenidate hydrochloride ER, centanafadine was associated with significantly lower risk of dry mouth (risk difference [RD] in percentage points: -11.95), initial insomnia (-11.10), decreased appetite (-8.05), anxiety (-5.39), palpitations (-5.25), and feeling jittery (-4.73) though a significantly smaller reduction in AISRS score (4.16-point). In the sensitivity analysis, the safety results were consistent with the primary analysis but there was no significant difference in efficacy between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. CONCLUSION: In this MAIC, centanafadine had better safety and possibly lower efficacy than methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. While safety results were robust across analyses, there was no efficacy difference between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER in the sensitivity analysis. Considering its favorable safety profile, centanafadine may be preferred among patients for whom treatment-related adverse events are a concern.

Practical management of oral treprostinil in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Lessons from ADAPT, EXPEDITE, and expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Oral treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue approved to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) by delaying disease progression and improving exercise capacity. Higher doses of oral treprostinil correlate with increased treatment benefit. Titrations may be challenging due to common side effects of prostacyclin-class therapies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The multicenter, prospective, real-world, observational ADAPT Registry study followed adult patients with PAH for up to 78 weeks after initiating oral treprostinil (NCT03045029). Dosing, titration, and transitions of oral treprostinil were at the discretion of the prescriber. Patient-reported incidence and treatment of common side effects were collected to understand side effect management and tolerability. Insights from literature and expert recommendations were added to provide a consolidated resource for oral treprostinil use. RESULTS: In total, 139 participants in ADAPT completed ≥1 weekly survey; (median age 60.0 years, 76% female). Median treatment duration of oral treprostinil was 13.1 months. During early therapy (Months 1-5), 62% (78/126) of patients reported headache and diarrhea, and 40% (50/126) reported nausea. At Month 6, many patients who reported side effects during early therapy reported an improvement (61% headache, 44% diarrhea, 70% nausea). Common side effect treatments, including acetaminophen, loperamide, and ondansetron were effective. Approximately one-quarter of patients reporting the most common side effects were untreated at Month 6. CONCLUSION: Patient selection for, and initiation and titration of oral treprostinil should be individualized and may include parenteral treprostinil induction-transition for faster titration. Assertive side effect management may help reach higher and more efficacious doses of oral treprostinil.

Evaluation of the associations of interlukin-7 genetic variants with toxicity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A replication study of a Japanese population, based on the findings of a European genome-wide association study.

AIM: Recent genome-wide association studies of European populations have identified rs16906115, a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the interleukin-7 gene, as a predictor of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated this single-nucleotide polymorphism in a Japanese population. METHODS: From January 2021, we stored host DNA from individuals who received various types of immune checkpoint inhibitors. From this population, we categorized 510 participants into cases (grade ≥2 irAEs) and controls (received ≥3 immune checkpoint inhibitor doses, follow-up ≥12 weeks, no irAEs), and divided 339 hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with atezolizumab/bevacizumab into responders and non-responders, evaluated using the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. We compared the minor allele frequencies of rs16906115 between cases and controls, and responders and non-responders. RESULTS: In the irAE prediction analysis of 234 cases and 276 controls, the minor allele frequency was 0.244 in the case group and 0.265 in the control group. This difference is not significant. In the analysis predicting the therapeutic efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients, the responders had a significantly lower minor allele frequency of 0.220, compared with 0.300 for the non-responders (p = 0.022). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the minor allele homozygosity as a significant predictor of treatment response, with odds ratios of 0.292 (p = 0.015) in the univariate analysis and 0.315 (p = 0.023) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In our Japanese cohort, no association was found between the rs16906115 minor allele and irAEs or treatment efficacy. The minor allele homozygosity may be associated with a negative therapeutic outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry with the number UMIN000043798.

Experience and side effects of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among university students: a cross-sectional survey study.

Introduction: Many people expressed concern over coronavirus vaccinations' reliability and side effects. This research aimed to assess university students' perceptions and experiences regarding the side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines in Bangladesh. Method: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey to collect responses from university students vaccinated with any vaccines administered in Bangladesh between November 2021 to April 2022. Bangladeshi university students over the age of 18 and having an internet connection was included in the study. A binary logistic regression analysis along with Pearson's Chi-square test were used to identify COVID-19 vaccine-related side effects predictors after receiving the first dose. Results: A total of 1,176 participants responded voluntarily to the online study, and most were vaccinated. More than half of the participants received the Sinopharm vaccine (56.5%), while others received Covishield (8.9%), Moderna (7.3%), and Pfizer (5.8%) vaccine. Around 32% of the participants reported side effects after receiving the first dose of the vaccine, including pain and edema (78.4%), body temperature (20.3%), and headache (14.5%), while a few experienced allergy, anxiety, and uneasy feelings. About 17% of the participants reported experiencing side effects after the second dose of the vaccine, including pain and edema (7.5%), body temperature (8.8%), and headache (7.3%). Most side effects were significantly associated with the Moderna vaccine (p < 0.001). Female students and those previously infected with COVID-19 were significantly associated with the side effects after taking the first dose of the vaccine. Conclusion: We found that side effects are mild and did not pose a significant challenge to Bangladesh's effort in managing and reducing the risk associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Use of Clozapine in persons with a history of seizures: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Seizures are considered to be one of the dreaded side effects of clozapine, and due to this, the use of clozapine is avoided in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Resultantly, there is little information about the use of clozapine among patients with seizure disorder. AIM: To assess the safety of clozapine in patients with history of seizures in their lifetime before starting clozapine and receiving clozapine for the management of psychotic disorders. RESULTS: Out of the 958 patients, 35 (3.65 %) had a history of at least one seizure episode before starting clozapine, with a mean of 5.06 (SD: 7.23; Median: 3.00) seizures before starting clozapine. The mean duration between the last seizure and the starting of clozapine was 123.75 (SD: 124.99; Median: 84) months, with nine patients having an episode of seizure in the previous 12 months and 15 patients being seizure-free for more than ten years. About one-fourth (25.7 %; nine out of 35) of the patients had recurrence of seizure while receiving clozapine for a mean duration of about five years. When the recurrence of seizure after starting clozapine was evaluated in patients receiving antiepileptics along with clozapine, the incidence of at least one seizure was 26.67 % (4 out of 15), and among those not receiving antiepileptics, the incidence of at least one seizure was 25 % (5 out of 20). The dose of clozapine at which seizure was noted ranged from 12.5 mg to 600 mg/day with a mean of 236.25 (SD: 169.04; Median: 162.5) mg/day. In none of the patients, clozapine had to be stopped due to the continuation of seizures. CONCLUSION: About one-fourth of the patients with history of an episode of seizure have recurrence of seizure while receiving clozapine. The demographic and clinical variables do not differ between those who develop and who do not develop seizures after starting clozapine, including concomitant use of antiepileptics.

Ocular side effects of anticancer agents used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers.

The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.

Clopidogrel-induced thrombotic microangiopathy: a case report.

Thrombotic microangiopathy is a serious condition that can be precipitated by exposure to certain medications. Although rare, it is life threatening and requires a high index of clinical suspicion, appropriate laboratory testing and immediate cessation of the offending agent. We present a case of a 75-year-old man with a history of ischaemic heart disease treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. One month after initiating the treatment he developed microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and thrombocytopenia. Extensive clinical and laboratory investigations suggested thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to clopidogrel. The drug was immediately discontinued and treatment with intravenous corticosteroids was started. Within a week the patient's laboratory parameters normalised, indicating successful recovery. This case highlights the role of early detection and immediate discontinuation of suspected medication in the effective management of clopidogrel-induced thrombotic microangiopathy. Healthcare professionals should consider drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy as a possible diagnosis in patients receiving clopidogrel who present with thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations: a 5-year analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Preoperative medication errors can be prevented by screening patients through a preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of implementing such a consultation and to determine which patients would benefit most. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included all patients who underwent a preoperative pharmacy consultation between 2016 and 2020. During this consultation, two part-time pharmacists reviewed patients' appropriate preoperative chronic medication management. All prevented errors were collected and classified by therapeutic group and type of error. A team of pharmacists and anaesthetists assigned to each prevented medication error a probability of causing an adverse event 'p', following the methodology of Nesbit et al by establishing five different 'p' values: 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6. 'p' = 1 was not considered. The cost of an adverse event was determined to be between €4124 and €6946 according to current literature, and a sensitivity analysis was performed by increasing the interval by 20% above and below. The cost of employing two part-time specialist pharmacists was estimated to be €59 142. Savings per medication error prevented were calculated as (€4124 OR €6946) × 'p'. Total savings were the sum of all costs associated with prevented medication errors. Patients on chronic medications who were in therapeutic groups with a 0.6 probability of an adverse event or who were in therapeutic groups responsible for 50% of the prevented adverse events were considered prioritisable. RESULTS: 3105 patients attended the consultation and 1179 medication errors were prevented, corresponding to 300 adverse events. 42.2% of the errors had a 'p' of 0.4. The costs avoided by this consultation ranged from €1 237 200 to €2 083 800, while the cost of its implementation was €295 710. The cost-effectiveness ratio was between €4.2 and €7.0 saved per euro invested. In the sensitivity analysis, the ratios ranged from €3.3 to €8.5 per euro invested. Fifteen different therapeutic groups accounted for 90% of the medication errors prevented. The therapeutic groups 'Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system', 'Antidiabetics, non-insulin (excluding SGLT2)' and 'Antithrombotics: low molecular weight heparins' were responsible for 56% of the prevented adverse events. The therapeutic groups 'Antidiabetics: rapid-acting insulin' and 'Antithrombotic agents: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, or direct oral anticoagulants' had a 'p' of 0.6. Therefore, patients in six therapeutic groups should be prioritised for preoperative pharmacy counselling. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations in Spain has proven to be cost-effective. Incorporating the probability of a medication error causing an adverse event allowed the prioritisation of patients for these consultations. Patients taking anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics, rapid-acting insulins, and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system benefited the most. This study could serve as a basis for implementing such consultations in other hospitals, as they are effective in reducing the cost of medication errors in surgical patients.

Can the radiation dose be safely reduced in the treatment of nk/T cell lymphoma?

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of dose reduction in the radiotherapy of NK/T-cell lymphoma. A retrospective collection of clinical and treatment data was conducted on 41 patients. The analysis aimed to assess whether the reduction in radiation therapy dosage affected patients' local control and survival. Among the 41 patients, all achieved complete remission after the initial treatment. With a median follow-up of 28.4 months, all except one patient demonstrated good control within the irradiated area. In the entire cohort, a total of 6 patients died and none of the deaths were caused by local tumor failure. The 3-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate was 83.8%, 94.4%, respectively. The incidence of long-term toxicity was low. It seems safe to reduce the prophylactic radiation dose to 45 Gy and the preliminary treatment results are satisfactory, with further reduction in side effects.

Metronidazole-Induced Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome With Parvovirus B19 Reactivation: A Pediatric Case.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe and rare syndrome that causes life-threatening organ dysfunctions. Here, we present the case of a 10-year-old child who developed a pruritic erythematous eruption, fever, facial edema, and lymphadenopathy seven days after receiving intravenous metronidazole (20 mg/kg/day), vancomycin (50 mg/kg/day), and cefotaxime (200 mg/kg/day). Laboratory tests showed eosinophilia and liver damage as well as positive parvovirus B19 IgM and IgG indicating viral reactivation. Vancomycin was initially discontinued and later reintroduced with no ill effects. The patient was managed with topical corticosteroid emollients and cetirizine and improved within seven days of metronidazole withdrawal. Treatment with cefotaxime was continued and showed no adverse effects.

Pharmacovigilance of esketamine nasal spray: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) is a new drug for treatment-resistant depression, and we aimed to detect and characterize the adverse events (AEs) of ESK-NS using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database between 2019 Q1 and 2023 Q4. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) were performed to detect risk signals from the FAERS data to identify potential ESK-NS-AEs associations. A total of 14,606 reports on AEs with ESK-NS as the primary suspected drug were analyzed. A total of 518 preferred terms signals and 25 system organ classes mainly concentrated in psychiatric disorders (33.20%), nervous system disorders (16.67%), general disorders and administration site conditions (14.21%), and others were obtained. Notably, dissociation (n = 1,093, ROR 2,257.80, PRR 899.64, EBGM 876.86) exhibited highest occurrence rates and signal intensity. Moreover, uncommon but significantly strong AEs signals, such as hand-eye coordination impaired, feeling guilty, and feelings of worthlessness, were observed. Additionally, dissociative disorder (n = 57, ROR 510.92, PRR 506.70, EBGM 386.60) and sedation (n = 688, ROR 172.68, PRR 155.53, and EBGM 142.05) both presented strong AE signals, and the former is not recorded in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). In clinical applications, close attention should be paid to the psychiatric disorders and nervous system disorders, especially dissociation. Meanwhile, clinical professionals should be alert for the occurrence of AEs signals not mentioned in the SmPC and take preventive measures to ensure the safety of clinical use.

Top 10 Signs and Symptoms of Psychotropic Adverse Drug Events to Monitor in Long-Term Care Residents.

OBJECTIVES: To produce a consensus list of the top 10 signs and symptoms suggestive of adverse drug events (ADEs) for monitoring in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) who use antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, or antidepressants. DESIGN: A 3-round Delphi study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Geriatricians, psychiatrists, pharmacologists, general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses, and caregivers from 13 Asia Pacific, European, and North American countries. METHODS: Three survey rounds were completed between April and June 2023. In Round 1, participants indicated their level of agreement on a 9-point Likert scale on whether 41 signs or symptoms identified in a systematic review should be routinely monitored. Participants considered signs and symptoms that reduce quality of life or cause significant harm, are observable or measurable by nurses or care workers, and can be assessed at a single time point. Round 1 statements were included in a list for prioritization in Round 3 if ≥ 70% of participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. Statements were excluded if ≤ 30% of participants responded ≥7. In Round 2, participants indicated their level of agreement with statements that did not reach initial consensus, plus amended statements based on Round 1 participant feedback. Round 2 statements were included in Round 3 if ≥ 50% of the participants responded ≥7 on the Likert scale. In Round 3, participants prioritized the signs and symptoms. RESULTS: Forty-four participants (93.6%) completed all 3 rounds. Four of 41 signs and symptoms reached consensus for inclusion after Round 1, and 9 after Round 2. The top 10 signs and symptoms prioritized in Round 3 were recent falls, daytime drowsiness or sleepiness, abnormal movements (eg, shaking or stiffness), confusion or disorientation, balance problems, dizziness, postural hypotension, reduced self-care, restlessness, and dry mouth. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The top 10 signs and symptoms provide a basis for proactive monitoring for psychotropic ADEs.

A Dialogue about Vaccine Side Effects: Understanding Difficult Pandemic Experiences.

This paper investigates the relationship between the experiences of mass vaccinations against two pandemic viruses: the swine flu in 2009-2010 and COVID-19 in the early 2020s. We show how distressing memories from the swine flu vaccination, which led to the rare but severe adverse effect of narcolepsy in approximately 500 children in Sweden, were triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. The narcolepsy illness story has rarely been told in academic contexts; therefore, we will provide space for this story. It is presented through a dialogue with the aim of shedding light on the interrelationship between pandemics-and between mass vaccinations-to investigate what could be termed cultural wounds that influence societies because they are characterized by the difficulty of talking about them. The paper explores the multiple shocks of illness in life and what can be learned from them by sharing them.

Hormone-related side effects in new users of a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device.

BACKGROUND: Although the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device is locally active and has low systemic hormone exposure, hormonal intrauterine device users sometimes report hormone-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate hormone-related adverse event rates among all participants and compare these among those who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month before enrollment. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 1714 women aged 16-45 years old received a levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device in a multicenter phase 3 trial to evaluate contraceptive efficacy and safety for up to 10 years. This analysis evaluated a subset of participants who used combined hormonal or no hormonal contraception in the month prior to device placement. We assessed all non-expulsion, non-bleeding-related events with ≥1% incidence at 180 days with a plan to include weight increase regardless of incidence; we excluded events considered non-hormonal. We computed 180-day side effect frequency rates based on the number of days a side effect was reported during the study period. We created a multivariable model for side effect incidence at 180 days based on age, race, ethnicity, body mass index at enrollment, parity, and contraception use in the month before enrollment. For those side effects with a p-value <0.2 on univariate comparison between combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users, we secondarily evaluated 360-day event rates. RESULTS: Overall, 644 participants used combined hormonal contraception (primarily oral [n=499, 77.5%]) and 855 used no hormonal method before IUD placement. Individual side effect rates over the first 180 days did not differ between prior combined-hormonal and no-hormonal contraception users except for acne (84 [13.0%] versus 73 [8.5%], respectively), p=0.006, OR 1.61 (95% CI 1.15-2.24). However, this association was weaker after adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, obesity status, and parity (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.99-1.98) At 360 days, prior combined hormonal contraception users were more likely to report acne (101 [15.7%] vs. 91 [10.6%], respectively, p=0.005) and orgasm/libido problems (20 [3.1%] vs. 12 [1.4%], respectively, p=0.03). Over the first 180 days, all side effects other than acne were reported in less than 3% of days; acne was reported an average of 13 days (7.4%) per prior combined hormonal contraception user and 9 days (5.0%) per prior non-hormonal contraception user (p<0.0001). Discontinuation for evaluated side effects occurred in 83 (5.5%) participants with no difference between those who used combined hormonal (36 [5.6%]) or no hormonal contraception (47 [5.5%]), p=1.0) before study entry. CONCLUSIONS: Using combined hormonal contraception prior to levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device placement is only weakly associated with reporting hormonally related side effects like acne. Only a small percentage of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device users experienced potentially hormone-related side effects during the initial 6 months of use that resulted in discontinuation.

Antifungal prophylaxis against invasive Candida and Aspergillus infection in adult heart transplant recipients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) can contribute to increased mortality and morbidity rates after heart transplant in adults. The most common causes are Aspergillus and Candida species. There is uncertainty on how effective antifungal prophylaxis is against Candida spp infections and limited guidance on the prevention of Aspergillus spp infections. This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess the literature to see if antifungal prophylaxis reduces the incidence of IFI after heart transplant in adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta Analysis guidelines. A systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, and Proquest databases will be undertaken. Reference lists of retrieved publications and conference abstracts will also be searched. Title, abstract and full-text screening will be undertaken by two reviewers. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Studies with paediatric patients, multi-organ transplants, or patients with a second heart transplant will be excluded, along with those who do not have clear definitions and diagnostic criteria for IFI. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool. A meta-analysis will be carried out, but if studies are not deemed to be sufficiently similar, only a narrative synthesis will be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as primary data will not be collected. The results of the review will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal and scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024516588.

Therapeutic effect of epidural dexamethasone palmitate in a rat model of lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Dexamethasone palmitate (DEP), a prodrug of dexamethasone (DEX), is a synthetic corticosteroid medication distinguished by the inclusion of a fatty acid component known as palmitate. This study introduces DEP as a novel therapeutic option for spinal epidural injection, aiming to provide safer and longer-lasting pain relief as an alternative to for patients with spinal stenosis. METHODS: 40 rats were randomly divided into four groups: those receiving epidural administration of normal saline (NS), and DEP in the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) model, and non-model rats receiving epidural NS administration. Paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimulation and motor function (neurogenic intermittent claudication) were observed for up to 21 days. Hematology and blood chemistry analyses were performed 1 week after drug therapy. Tissue samples were collected for steroid pathology examination to evaluate adhesion degree, perineural area inflammation, and chromatolysis in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG), and adrenal gland. RESULTS: The DEX and DEP groups demonstrated significant recovery from mechanical allodynia and motor dysfunction after 2 weeks of drug therapy (p<0.001). However, by the third week, the effect of DEX started to diminish while the effect of DEP persisted. Furthermore, the DEP group exhibited reduced fibrosis and less chromatolysis than the NS group. No steroid overdose or toxin was observed in any group. CONCLUSION: The epidural administration of DEP demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in reducing allodynia and hyperalgesia resulting from chronic DRG compression, thus offering prolonged pain relief. These findings underscore the potential of DEP as a promising treatment alternative for pain associated with LSS, serving as a viable substitute for .

Efficacy and safety of dose-dense gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dose-dense gemcitabine and cisplatin (ddGC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced MIBC (cT2aN0M0-cT4N1M0) who received ddGC between December 2017 and December 2023 were included. Regimens of ddGC with pegfilgrastim were administered every 2 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by radical cystectomy. The pathological complete response (CR) (pT0N0) and objective response (OR) (