Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)-guided vs conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomised control trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of routine use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) in improving perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing IOUS-guided laparoscopic nephrectomy (IOUS-LN) and conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy (C-LN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a parallel-arm, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial (CTRI/2021/12/038906). All patients undergoing LN, either for benign or malignant causes, were included. Patients undergoing partial/cytoreductive nephrectomy, with venous thrombus were excluded. In the study arm, IOUS-guided renal vascular assessment was performed after colon mobilisation and a standard LN was performed in the control arm. The primary outcome was intraoperative duration. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for open conversion, blood transfusion, perioperative complications, duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and length of hospitalisation (LOH). The patients were followed for 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included, with 52 in each arm. Demographic characteristics were comparable in both arms. A significant reduction in the operative duration (mean [sd] 181.69 [40.8] vs 199.7 [41.8] min, P = 0.02) was seen in the IOUS-LN group. The difference in blood loss showed no significant difference when compared between both groups (median [interquartile range] 84.55 [74-105.5] vs 99.95 [78.5-111] mL, P = 0.08). On subgroup analysis, the reduction in the operative duration was significant in patients who underwent laparoscopic simple nephrectomy (LSN; mean [sd] 194.4 [42.5] vs 221.2 [36.4] min, P = 0.01), whereas comparable operative durations were seen in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN; mean [sd] 168.96 [35.3] vs 178.3 [35.9] min, P = 0.34). Similar conversion rates were seen in both groups (P = 0.98) along with blood transfusions (P = 0.78). The LOH, ICU stay, and complications were similar in both groups. Significantly less blood loss (P = 0.03) was noted with IOUS in patients undergoing LSN. IOUS did not influence any outcomes in patients undergoing LRN. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ultrasonography significantly reduced the operative duration in LN, but with no significant reduction in the volume of blood loss. Significant reduction in intraoperative duration and blood loss was seen in patients who underwent LSN on subgroup analysis.

Giant Pyonephrosis in an Ectopic Kidney: A Case Report.

Pyonephrosis is characterized by infective hydronephrosis accompanied by suppurative destruction of the renal parenchyma, resulting in partial or complete impairment of renal function. Patients present with wide range of symptoms, they can be asymptomatic in 15% but most of them present with septic features like fever, chills, and flank pain. Urinary tract infections, functional and anatomic obstruction, and anatomic anomalies such as pelvic and horseshoe kidneys are common etiologic factors. We report a 30 years old female patient with giant pyonephrosis in an ectopic kidney. She presented with acute toxic symptoms after she has been experiencing progressive abdominal swelling and pain for a couple of years. Simple nephrectomy was done four weeks after she has been initially treated with percutaneous drainage of the pus and intravenous antibiotics.

Is simple nephrectomy the right nomenclature? - Comparing simple and radical nephrectomy to find the answer.

Introduction: The word "simple" means "easily done" or "presenting no difficulty." Hence, the "Simple Nephrectomy" (SN) operation should be "easy to perform." However, in clinical practice, we have noticed that SN can be equally or more challenging surgery than radical nephrectomy (RN). This study assesses the need to modify the terminology of simple nephrectomy and identify the level of difficulty between SN and RN by comparing various intraoperative and postoperative factors. Methods: Patients undergoing open SN for benign renal disease (Group A) and RN for T1/2 renal tumors (Group B) were included in the study. Two groups were compared for operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, blood transfusion rate, and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 114 patients were analyzed (82 in Group A and 32 in Group B). Mean age of the patients was higher in Group B (41.2 vs 53.6 years, P < 0.01). Mean operative time (136.8 vs 125.5 min, P = 0.08), incidence of postoperative complications (32.9% vs 25%, P = 0.50), length of hospital stay (7.2 vs 6.5 days, P = 0.09), estimated blood loss more than 500 ml (13.4% vs 9.3%, P = 0.75), and requirement of blood transfusion (10.9% vs 6.2%, P = 0.72) were higher in group A. Conclusion: The application of correct terminology is important to understand the subject and to convey the information. Simple nephrectomy is not an appropriate term as it is equally challenging to perform than its radical counterpart.

The Simple Nephrectomy Is Not Always Simple: Predictors of Surgical Difficulties.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is one of the major risk factors for SN complications because the dense and fibrotic tissue leads to significant challenges to dissection. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the predictive factors preoperatively, especially inflammation markers and radiologic findings, which can pose challenges to surgery in simple nephrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 156 patients who underwent simple open nephrectomy. There were 87 patients in group 1 (peroperative nonadherent perinephric fat) and 69 patients in group 2 (peroperative adherent perinephric fat). The preoperative computed tomography findings (renal volume, perinephric stranding, posterior perinephric fat thickness, lateral perinephric fat thickness, Hounsfield unit [HU] of perinephric fat, HU of subcutaneous fat, HU of renal parenchyma, HU of renal pelvis), side of the kidney affected, prior surgery at the same kidney, complication rates, and operative time were analyzed. Preoperative inflammation markers, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, monocyte-HDL ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio levels were recorded. RESULTS: Preoperative NLR and SII were statistically higher, and HDL was statistically lower in group 2; there was no difference in PLR and monocyte-HDL ratio between the 2 groups. According to the preoperative imaging, the perinephric stranding, HU of perinephric fat, and HU of renal parenchyma were higher in group 2, 54 (78.3), -36.93 (-91.46, -21.69), and 38.60 (32.11, 41.94), respectively. DM, history of nonsterile urine culture, HU of perinephric fat >61.78, and SII >689.36 were the factors that could be identified as independent significant predictors of presence of adherent perinephric fat. CONCLUSION: The radiological findings and inflammation markers can be used as the predictive factor for peroperative adherent perinephric tissue and surgical difficulties.

A case report of post-surgical page kidney due to extensive renal hematoma following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Post-surgical Page kidney due to large renal hematoma following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a rare significant complication that may lead to loss of a kidney. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old lady underwent elective left side PCNL for a 3 cm renal pelvis stone, and one week later, she presented back with a massive renal hematoma with high blood pressure. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The ultrasound abdomen and computed tomography diagnosed a page kidney due to massive intrarenal and perirenal hematoma as a complication of PCNL. Angioembolization and percutaneous aspiration were failed, and the antihypertensives also failed to control the blood pressure. Therefore, she underwent a left-side simple nephrectomy and had an uneventful recovery with reversal of normal blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Post-surgical page kidney needs to identify early to facilitate the percutaneous radiological interventions that may preserve the renal parenchyma and avoid further surgeries. Nevertheless, late cases or the failed radiologically intervened cases need open renal exploration and simple nephrectomy, which may be the bailed-out procedure to reverse the consequence of page kidney.

Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port procedure for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney.

INTRODUCTION: To describe laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: a 58-year-old female with fever was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography demonstrated a markedly atrophic right kidney and mild hydronephrosis. Case 2: a 64-year-old male with a history of several intra-abdominal surgeries visited our hospital with a complaint of left back pain and fever. Computed tomography demonstrated left marked hydronephrosis, thinning of renal parenchyma, and duplicated inferior vena cava. After antibiotic treatment, transperitoneal reduced port simple nephrectomy and retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy were performed in Case 1 and 2, respectively, because the function of the affected kidney was almost lost on renography. Although adhesion was slightly noted around the renal hilum in Case 1, neither conversion to laparotomy nor placement of additional ports was needed. CONCLUSION: Laparoendoscopic single-site simple nephrectomy and reduced port simple nephrectomy for inflammatory nonfunctioning kidney may be options for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Comparative Study of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Versus Open Ipsilateral Nephrectomy After Percutaneous Nephrostomy: A Multicenter Analysis.

Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ipsilateral nephrectomy of a benign nonfunctional kidney after percutaneous nephrostomy, and to compare this method with open surgery. Materials and Methods: Data from 70 patients who underwent simple nephrectomy from January 2014 to October 2018 at three large centers were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent percutaneous nephrostomy because of renal or ureteral calculi with severe hydronephrosis or pyonephrosis. Simple nephrectomy was performed via retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (retroperitoneal laparoscopic group; n = 33) or open surgery (open group; n = 37). The retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open groups were compared regarding preoperative variables (age, sex, location of surgery, hypertension, diabetes, BMI, preoperative serum creatinine level, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, fistula duration, fistula size, number of fistulae, and urinary tract infection), and perioperative variables (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, catheter indwelling time, gastrointestinal function recovery time, duration of bedrest, duration of postoperative hospitalization, postoperative hemoglobin decline, perioperative transfusion, and postoperative complications). Results: The retroperitoneal laparoscopic group included more patients with hydronephrosis, while the open group included more patients with pyonephrosis. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age (P = .813), sex (P = .729), location of surgery (P = .345), hypertension (P = .271), diabetes (P = .394), BMI (P = .798), preoperative serum creatinine level (P = .826), ASA grade (P = .820), fistula duration (P = .108), fistula size (P = .958), number of fistulae (P = .925), urinary tract infection (P = .111), or operative time (P = .851). The retroperitoneal laparoscopic group had significantly lesser intraoperative blood loss (P = .007), postoperative drainage volume (P = .008), shorter catheter indwelling time (P = .002), gastrointestinal function recovery time (P < .001), duration of bedrest (P < .001), and duration of postoperative hospitalization (P < .001), and lesser postoperative hemoglobin decline (P = .035) compared with the open group. Conclusions: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ipsilateral nephrectomy is feasible for a benign nonfunctional kidney after percutaneous nephrostomy. The surgical method should be selected based on the surgeon's experience and the specific situation of the patient.

Who is at risk of death from nephrectomy? An analysis of thirty-day mortality after 21 380 nephrectomies in 3 years of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) National Nephrectomy Audit.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain contemporary overall and differential thirty-day mortality (TDM) rates after all types of nephrectomy in the UK, and to identify potential new risk factors for death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 110 deaths that occurred within 30 days of surgery out of the total of 21 380 nephrectomies performed, and calculated the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for TDM based on peri-operative characteristics. RESULTS: The overall TDM rate was 110/21380 (0.5%). The TDM rates after radical, partial, simple nephrectomy and nephro-ureterectomy were 0.6% (63/11057), 0.1% (4/3931), 0.4% (11/2819) and 0.9% (28/3091), respectively. TDM increased with age, stage, estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time and performance status. EBL of 1-2 L was associated with a greater risk of TDM than EBL of 2-5 L (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03-2.24). Conversion from minimally invasive surgery was associated with higher risk than non-conversion (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.14-4.51. Curative surgery was safer than cytoreductive surgery (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.18-0.54). There was an association between surgical volume and TDM. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides contemporary insights into the true risks of all types of nephrectomy. The TDM rate after nephrectomy in the UK appears acceptably low at 0.5%. Established risk factors were confirmed and the following novel risk factors were identified: modest EBL (1-2 L) and conversion from minimally invasive surgery.

Comparison of preoperative adaptive enlargement of the contralateral normal kidney in patients nephrectomized for benign non-functioning kidney versus renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential effects of preoperative volumetric compensation of the contralateral normal kidney on renal function after simple nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. METHODS: A total of 306 patients (80 simple nephrectomy patients and 226 radical nephrectomy patients) with 1:3 propensity score matching were included between October 1996 and December 2013. Preoperative three-dimensional kidney volume was estimated from computed tomography images using a specialized volumetric program. Glomerular filtration rate assessed using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations was checked preoperatively, 1 week, 3 months and 1 year after nephrectomy. RESULTS: Preoperative mean Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtration rate was 76.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the simple nephrectomy group and 89.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the radical nephrectomy group. In simple nephrectomy patients, mean Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtration rate showed a stable pattern up to 3 months (75.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 7 days and 76.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 3 months), and decreased slightly to 72.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year. However, in radical nephrectomy patients, mean Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration glomerular filtration rate decreased immediately to 63.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 7 days after surgery, and then increased gradually to 64.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 3 months and 65.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year. Preoperative mean contralateral normal kidney volume was 225.7 mL in the simple nephrectomy group and 180.1 mL in the radical nephrectomy group (P < 0.001). The contralateral normal kidney volume to total normal kidney volume ratio was 0.74 in the simple nephrectomy group and 0.51 in the radical nephrectomy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative volumetric compensation of the contralateral normal kidney is important to maintain postoperative renal function in patients undergoing nephrectomy.

Prospective study of preoperative factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively study and identify, the preoperative factors which predict intraoperative difficulty in laparoscopic transperitoneal simple nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Seventy seven patients (41 males and 36 females) with mean age of 43 ± 17 years, undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy at our institute between February 2012 to May 2013 were included in this study. Preoperative patients' characteristics recorded were: Gender of patients, history of intervention, palpable lump, BMI, urine culture, side, size of kidney, fixity of kidney on USG, perinephric fat stranding on preoperative CT scan, periureteral fat stranding, perinephric collection, enlarged hilar lymph nodes, renal vascular anomalies, differential renal function on renogram. Preoperative factors of these patients were noted and intraoperative difficulty in the surgery was scored between 1 (easiest) to 10 (most difficult or open conversion) by a single surgeon (who was a part of all studies either as operating surgeon or assistant). Using SPSS 15.0 software, multivariate and univariate analysis was done. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis presence of pyonephrosis on preoperative evaluation and BMI < 25kg/m(2) were found to be statistically significant factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. On univariate analysis following factors were associated with increased surgeon's score: Lower BMI, palpable kidney, pyonephrosis, history of renal intervention, perinephric fat stranding, right side, fixity of kidney on USG with surrounding structures. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that presence of pyonephrosis as identified on preoperative imaging and a BMI of less than 25 Kg/m(2) are the most significant factors predicting intraoperative difficulty during laparoscopic simple nephrectomy.

Therapeutic results in stage I Wilms' tumors in children - 15 years of surgical experience.

INTRODUCTION: Progress in the therapeutic management of Wilms' tumors (WT) in children has resulted in the fact that presently, almost all children with stage I and favorable histology diseases have a chance for a cure. THE AIM OF THE STUDY: The objective of the report is an analysis of therapeutic results in children with unilateral stage I Wilms' tumors depending on the extent of tumor resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis included children treated between 1993 and 2008 under the Polish Wilms' Tumor Study, initially following the protocol SIOP 93-01 (patients treated up to 2002) and subsequently SIOP 2001. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, depending on tumor size and tumor response to treatment, the children were qualified for a radical nephrectomy, simple nephrectomy, or nephron-sparing surgery. Following surgical treatment, all the children were subjected to adjuvant chemotherapy in keeping with the therapeutic protocol obligatory at the time. RESULTS: Within the 15 years, 111 children with Wilms' tumor were treated; the group included 43 children with stage I disease, which constituted 38.9% of the total number. Radical nephrectomies were performed in three (6.98%) children, simple nephrectomies in 32 (74.42%), and nephron-sparing surgery in eight (18.6%). Regardless of the employed surgical treatment modality, all the children are alive and none have demonstrated recurrent disease. The mean post-treatment completion follow-up period is 73 months (median value, 68 months). CONCLUSION: A simple nephrectomy and, whenever possible, nephron-sparing surgery represents sufficient treatment in 93% of children with stage I Wilms' tumor. To improve qualification for surgical treatment we propose the employment of NSS for stage Ia Wilms' tumors and SN for stage Ib Wilms' tumors.

Two-year outcomes after robotic renal surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

The purpose of this study is to validate the feasibility of the robotic technology for various types of renal surgery and to outline the 2-year clinical and pathological outcomes post surgery. In a retrospective chart review with IRB approval of 55 robotic renal surgeries, clinical data and pathological outcomes were recorded, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, radiological surveillance of tumor recurrences and overall quality of life on pre- and postoperative visits at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. There were 26 robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), 23 radical nephrectomy (RRN), 3 simple nephrectomy (RSN), and 3 radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) procedures. Twelve patients in the RPN group, 17 in the RRN group and all in the RSN and RNU groups had eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and one or more risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) preoperatively. Mean serum creatinine was 1.2, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.8, and eGFR was 66.4, 61.2, 55.8, and 41.0, respectively. There were two distant metastasis and four local recurrences in the RRN group, and two local recurrences in the RNU group. Serum creatinine and changes in eGFR were statistically similar in all groups postoperatively. Cancer-specific survival was 100% for RPN, 83% for RRN, and 100% for RNU while overall survival was 100% for RPN, 76% for RRN, 100% for RSN, and 100% for RNU at 2 years. Robotic renal surgery is a feasible, minimally invasive alternative with promising outcomes in our short-term follow-up. Long-term and comparative studies with open or conventional laparoscopic approaches are needed.

Description of a novel technique for suture ligation of the renal vessels during robotic nephrectomy.

Minimally invasive techniques are frequently used for surgical treatment of suspected malignant renal masses. We previously reported on our experience with robotic nephrectomy and the feasibility of performing suture ligation of the renal vessels using robotic needle drivers. We describe a novel technique for suture ligation of the renal vessels during robotic nephrectomy utilizing the robotic hook and a suture with loops at each end. Our technique for suture ligation of the renal vessels recapitulates the open technique without the need for exchanging the robotic working instruments for robotic needle drivers and without the need for endovascular staplers.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: Reports of 6 cases / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To discuss the clinical value of retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy. Methods Retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy was performed in 6 patients, including 5 cases of severe hydronephrosis with non-functioning kidney resulted from ureteral calculi and 1 case of renal tuberculosis. The operation was conducted via retroperitoneal approach. After the upper ureter and the renal pedicle were exposed, the renal artery and vein were clipped and severed. The renal pedicle was occluded only with titanium clips before the removal of the kidney. Results All the operations were performed successfully without complications. The operation time was 130~220 min (mean, 150 min) and the intraoperative blood loss, 80~150 ml (mean, 120 ml). The postoperative hospital stay ranged 5~7 days. Follow-ups for 3 months in the 5 patients with ureterolithiasis revealed normal renal functions. The patient with renal tuberculosis was given anti-tuberculosis therapy and followed for 6 months. No recurrence was seen and the patient’s serum creatinine level was 120 ?mol/L, which was slightly higher than the normal. Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy has advantages of minimal invasion, short hospital stay and rapid recovery. The procedure should be regarded as the “golden standard” for simple nephrectomy.