Evaluating Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: A Prospective Follow-Up Study.

Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a primary option within bariatric surgery (BS), exhibiting favorable outcomes in terms of weight reduction and improvement of associated health conditions. This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of LSG in morbid obesity (MO) in terms of weight reduction and improvement of comorbidities. Materials and methods A prospective follow-up study was conducted from January 2021 to January 2023 at the Department of Surgery, 7 Air Force Hospital, Kanpur. The study was approved by the institutional ethical committee with protocol no. IEC/612/2020, including 25 patients diagnosed with MO (BMI >40kg/m2) who underwent LSG. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to track improvements in comorbidities and weight loss. Pre- and post-operative photos were taken, and any complications during the follow-up period were noted. Results Most participants in the study were middle-aged individuals, and 84% of the cohort had common comorbidities such as hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM). LSG led to significant and sustained weight loss, with patients achieving an average reduction of 31.56 kg by the 12th month following the surgery. Moreover, substantial improvements in comorbidities, particularly HTN (76.9%) and DM (80%), were observed. However, not all comorbidities exhibited similar rates of recovery, highlighting the need for tailored management strategies. Using a correlation test, no significant correlation was found between the percentage over ideal body weight (IBW) and the reduction in excess weight, as indicated by a p-value exceeding 0.05. Conclusion LSG is an effective treatment for severe obesity, delivering significant weight loss and notable improvements in metabolic health and overall quality of life.

Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgeries Still Have Clinically Comparable Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is considered the main treatment option for patients with severe obesity. The objective of our study is to compare intra- and postoperative outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approaches within the sleeve gastrectomy (SG), duodenal switch (DS), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data from the MBSAQIP were collected for patients who underwent SG, DS, and RYGB between 2015 and 2021. The postoperative and procedural outcomes including 30-day morbidity and mortality as well as operation length were analyzed using regression models. RESULTS: Our analysis included 1,178,886 surgeries with SG comprising the majority (70%) followed by RYGB (28%) and DS (1%). Other than a higher adjusted risk of unplanned reoperation for robotic RYGB (relative risk (RR) 1.07) and a statistically significant higher rate of postoperative wound disruption in robotic SG for robotic surgery (RR 1.56), there were no statistically significant between-approach differences including infection, wound disruption, death, or reoperation for DS, RYGB, or SG. Our data showed no significant difference in anastomotic leak rate between laparoscopic and robotic approaches in either the DS (p = 0.521) or RYGB (p = 0.800) procedures. Across our study period, the median operation lengths decreased significantly per year for both the robotic SG and DS. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic and laparoscopic bariatric surgical procedures have statistically similar 30-day patient outcomes. Robotic bariatric procedures do have significantly longer median operative times than laparoscopic procedures. The decision to use a robotic approach or laparoscopic approach should be made based upon surgeon experience and possibly cost.

The Potential Mechanism of Remission in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.

In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with bariatric surgery remaining the most effective treatment strategy for these conditions. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has emerged as the most popular surgical procedure for bariatric/metabolic surgeries, effectively promoting weight loss and improving or curing T2DM. The alterations in the gastrointestinal tract following VSG may improve insulin secretion and resistance by increasing incretin secretion (especially GLP-1), modifying the gut microbiota composition, and through mechanisms dependent on weight loss. This review focuses on the potential mechanisms through which the enhanced action of incretin and metabolic changes in the digestive system after VSG may contribute to the remission of T2DM.

Timing Considerations for Sleeve Gastrectomy in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Single Center Evaluation.

Current scientific literature is deficient in detailing the optimal timing for conducting bariatric surgery in relation to kidney transplantation. In this study, we performed a retrospective evaluation of kidney transplant recipients with BMI >35 kg/m2. It aimed to provide data on those who received both sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and kidney transplantation (KT) simultaneously, as well as on patients who underwent SG and KT at different times, either before or after. In addition, the acceptance levels of the bariatric surgery among different scenarios were assessed. Our findings demonstrated that combined KT and SG led to successful weight loss, in contrast to undergoing kidney transplant alone, while maintaining comparable rates of graft and patient survival. Weight loss was similar between recipients who had a combined operation and those who underwent SG following the transplant. Additionally, over a median time frame of 1.7 years, patients who underwent SG before KT exhibited a statistically significant reduction in BMI at the time of the transplant. Notably, our study highlights that patients offered the combined procedure were significantly more likely to undergo SG compared to those for whom SG was presented at a different operative time than the transplant.

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on the Sonographic Grade of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease at 12-Month Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease across the globe. One of the most effective treatments for this disease is weight loss. This study aimed to determine how metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) affects MAFLD sonographic grades. METHODS: In 2021, a pre-post study was conducted on 73 patients who underwent MBS. The study collected demographic information and ultrasound grades of MAFLD before and after MBS. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients underwent MBS, with 58 females and 15 males. The patients had a mean age of 39.8 ± 8.88 years and a mean BMI of 42.12 ± 5.98 kg/m2. Of these patients, 53 (72.6%) underwent SG, while 20 (27.4%) underwent RYGB. The preoperative BMI for females and males decreased significantly at the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.0001). However, males experienced more prominent weight changes (P = 0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in fatty liver grade changes after MBS between males and females (P = 0.056), which suggests that the effect of MBS on fatty liver grades is not gender-specific. There was a significant reduction in BMI and fatty liver grade for patients under and over 40 years old after surgery (P = 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in fatty liver grade and BMI changes after MBS between the two age groups. RYGB was found to be more effective than SG in reducing fatty liver grade, BMI, and %TWL (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery can play a vital role in reducing the weight and severity of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Early changes of microRNAs in blood one month after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Changes in microRNAs (miRNAs) are relevant to bariatric surgery and its comorbidities. The characteristics of changes in miRNAs of the early postoperative period following both bariatric procedures, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), as well as the factors that related to the effectiveness of early weight loss remain unclear. METHODS: We recruited 18 patients who performed SG and 15 patients who performed RYGB. Their preoperative and 1-month postoperative clinical data and fasting serum samples were collected, and the latter were analyzed by RNA-sequencing. Differential expression analysis of miRNAs was performed by the R-tool. Functional classification annotation and pathway enrichment analysis of targeted genes were analyzed by KOBAS software. The change profiles of miRNAs for both surgeries and their correlation with clinical characteristics and weight loss effectiveness were further analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 85 differentially expressed miRNAs were identified before and after SG, while a total of 76 were found before and after RYGB. The target genes of these miRNAs were similar in the Gene Ontology enrichment analysis in SG and RYGB, and the enrichment analysis in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes was mainly related to metabolic pathways. Hsa-miR-493-5p, hsa-miR-184, and hsa-miR-3199 exhibited similar changes in SG and RYGB, and the former two were correlated with clinical characteristics. Hsa-miR-6729-5p, hsa-miR-4659b-5p, and hsa-miR-2277-5p were correlated with the weight loss effectiveness of SG, while hsa-miR-4662a-5p was correlated with the weight loss effectiveness of RYGB. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term metabolic improvement and weight loss occurring after SG and RYGB surgery might be related to changes in miRNAs, which act on multiple biological pathways by regulating genes. In addition, some clinical characteristics and miRNAs were related to the effectiveness of early weight loss after SG and RYGB surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200058333.

The impact on obesity-related quality of life and eating satisfaction in the early period after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity impairs patients' quality of life (QoL). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a common procedure for patients with severe obesity; however, studies reporting changes in obesity-related QoL are limited. The aim of this study was to assess changes in obesity-related QoL and food tolerance in the early postoperative period. METHODS: We included 20 consecutive patients who underwent LSG between May 2021 and July 2023. We evaluated changes in obesity-related QoL 6 months after surgery using an obesity and weight loss QoL questionnaire (OWLQOL) and a weight related symptom measure (WRSM). Additionally, we assessed eating satisfaction and food tolerance after surgery. RESULTS: The percentages of total weight loss and excess weight loss were 28.5% and 79.1%, respectively. OWLQOL scores and WRSM changed from 36.5 to 73.0 points and from 44.0 to 15.0 points (p = .007, .007), respectively. The food tolerance score decreased from 25 to 21.2 points (p < .001), while eating satisfaction showed no significant change (p = .25). CONCLUSION: Obesity-related QoL is enhanced even in the early postoperative period, without sacrificing eating satisfaction. The findings of this study may provide valuable insights for patients when considering LSG.

Hospital charges for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy compared to robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy has become a gold standard in addressing medically refractory obesity. Robotic platforms are becoming more utilized, however, data on its cost-effectiveness compared to laparoscopy remain controversial (1-3). At NYU Langone Health, many of the bariatric surgeons adopted robotic surgery as part of their practices starting in 2021. We present a retrospective cost analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) vs. robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) at New York University (NYU) Langone Health campuses. METHODS: All adult patients ages 18-65 who underwent LSG or RSG from 202 to 2023 at NYU Langone Health campuses (Manhattan, Long Island, and Brooklyn) were evaluated via electronic medical records and MBSAQIP 30-day follow-up data. Patients with prior bariatric surgery were excluded. Complication-related ICD-10/CPT codes are collected and readmission costs will be estimated from ICD codes using the lower limit of CMS transparent NYU standard charges (3). Direct charge data for surgery and length of stay cost data were also obtained. Statistical T-test and chi-squared analysis were used to compare groups. RESULTS: Direct operating cost data at NYU Health Campuses demonstrated RSG was associated with 4% higher total charges, due to higher OR charges, robotic-specific supplies, and more post-op ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: RSG was associated with higher overall hospital charges compared to LSG, though there are multiple contributing factors. More research is needed to identify cost saving measures. This study is retrospective in nature, and does not include indirect costs nor reimbursement. Direct operating costs, per contractual agreement with suppliers, are only given as percentages. Data are limited to 30-day follow-up.

30-day morbidity and mortality of revisional bariatric surgery - An international multi-centre collaborative (BROAD) study.

INTRODUCTION: Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is increasing worldwide. There is currently no large multinational, prospective data on 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the 30-day morbidity and mortality of RBS at participating centres. METHODS: An international steering group was formed to oversee the study. The steering group members invited bariatric surgeons worldwide to participate in this study. Ethical approval was obtained at the lead centre. Data were collected prospectively on all consecutive RBS patients operated between 15th May 2021 to 31st December 2021. Revisions for complications were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 65 global centres submitted data on 750 patients. Sleeve gastrectomy (n = 369, 49.2 %) was the most common primary surgery for which revision was performed. Revisional procedures performed included Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 41.1 % (n = 308) patients, One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in 19.3 % (n = 145), Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) in 16.7 % (n = 125) and other procedures in 22.9 % (n = 172) patients. Indications for revision included weight regain in 615(81.8 %) patients, inadequate weight loss in 127(16.9 %), inadequate diabetes control in 47(6.3 %) and diabetes relapse in 27(3.6 %). 30-day complications were seen in 80(10.7 %) patients. Forty-nine (6.5 %) complications were Clavien Dindo grade 3 or higher. Two patients (0.3 %) died within 30 days of RBS. CONCLUSION: RBS for insufficient weight loss/weight regain or metabolic relapse is associated with 10.7 % morbidity and 0.3 % mortality. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common primary procedure to undergo revisional bariatric surgery, while Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most commonly performed revision.

Predicting Inadequate Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: Derivation and Validation of a Four Factor Model.

INTRODUCTION: Weight loss following bariatric surgery is variable and predicting inadequate weight loss is required to help select patients for bariatric surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine variables associated with inadequate weight loss and to derive and validate a predictive model. METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrectomy (2008-2022) in a tertiary referral centre were followed up prospectively. Inadequate weight loss was defined as excess weight loss (EWL) < 50% by 24 months. A top-down approach was performed using multivariate logistic regression and then internally validated using bootstrapping. Patients were categorised into risk groups. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients (median age, 49 years; M:F, 69:211) were included (146 LSG; 134 LRYGB). At 24 months, the median total weight loss was 30.9% and 80.0% achieved EWL ≥ 50% by 24 months. Variables associated with inadequate weight loss were T2DM (OR 2.42; p = 0.042), age 51-60 (OR 1.93, p = 0.006), age > 60 (OR 4.93, p < 0.001), starting BMI > 50 kg/m² (OR 1.93, p = 0.037) and pre-operative weight loss (OR 3.51; p = 0.036). The validation C-index was 0.75 (slope = 0.89). Low, medium and high-risk groups had a 4.9%, 16.7% and 44.6% risk of inadequate weight loss, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate weight loss can be predicted using a four factor model which could help patients and clinicians in decision-making for bariatric surgery.

Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Chinese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric surgery procedure in China. However, its cost-effectiveness in Chinese patients is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of LSG vs no surgery in Chinese patients with severe and complex obesity, taking into account both healthcare expenses and the potential improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 135 Chinese patients who underwent LSG between January 3, 2022 and December 29, 2022, at a major bariatric center. The study evaluated the cost-effectiveness from a healthcare service perspective, employing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The analyses compared LSG with the alternative of not undergoing surgery over a 1-year period, using actual data, and extended to a lifetime horizon by projecting costs and utilities at an annual discount rate of 3.0%. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to explore cost-effectiveness variations across different sex, age and BMI categories, and diabetes status, employing a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). To ensure the reliability of the findings, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were executed. RESULTS: The results indicated that 1-year post-LSG, patients achieved an average total weight loss (TWL) of (32.7 ± 7.3)% and an excess weight loss (EWL) of (97.8 ± 23.1)%. The ICER for LSG compared to no surgery over a lifetime was $4,327/QALY, significantly below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for Chinese patients with severe and complex obesity. From a lifetime perspective, LSG proved to be cost-effective for all sex and age groups, across all BMI categories, and for both patients with and without diabetes. Notably, it was more cost-effective for younger patients, patients with higher BMI, and patients with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: LSG is a highly cost-effective intervention for managing obesity in Chinese patients, delivering substantial benefits in terms of HRQoL improvement at a low cost. Its cost-effectiveness is particularly pronounced among younger individuals, those with higher BMI, and patients with diabetes.

The real occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy - a prospective pH-monitoring study.

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is currently the most frequently performed bariatric procedure in the world. However, the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after SG remains controversial and questionable. Aim: To determine the occurrence of GERD after SG using a pH-monitoring study. Material and methods: This is a prospective study involving patients undergoing SG in one surgical centre. Inclusion criteria were eligibility for bariatric surgery, no symptoms of GERD, normal gastroscopy, and pH-monitoring before the surgery. Postoperative examinations were performed 6 months after surgery. Results: A total of 38 patients were analysed in the study. The mean age was 44.9 years, and the mean preoperative BMI was 42.6 kg/m2. Before surgery, all patients had normal pH values. After surgery, mean acid exposure time (AET), number of refluxes, and DeMeester score increased statistically significantly (p < 0.001). 27 (71.1%) patients each had AET > 6%, but only 9 (23.7%) reported GERD symptoms and the need for PPIs. The correlation between AET and %TWL was moderate positive, and the correlation between DeMeester score and %TWL was low positive (p = 0.011, p = 0.014, respectively). Conclusions: GERD after SG seems to be a significant problem. More than two-thirds of patients had de novo GERD after SG in pH-monitoring, but only one-quarter of them required PPIs.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty safety profile - retrospective, single-center analysis of 222 consecutive patients including the learning curve period.

Introduction: The global obesity epidemic affects over 1.9 billion adults, with an additional 650 million classified as obese. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a type of minimally invasive endobariatric procedure. It is a less invasive alternative to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Although the effectiveness of ESG is lower, it might have a better safety profile. Aim: To assess the safety profile of ESG and describe complications classified as grade II or higher, using the Clavien-Dindo classification, with an overview of the learning curve. Material and methods: We included 222 patients who underwent ESG at the Endoscopic and Bariatric Surgery Center of the hospital in Brzeziny from January 2021 to October 2023. The severity of complications was evaluated based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, considering complications of grade II or higher. Results: Among the studied group of patients, a total of 4 (1.8%) cases of perioperative bleeding into the gastrointestinal tract were recorded. One (0.5%) patient had the most severe grade IVb complication that required treatment in the Intensive Care Unit. All patients with serious adverse events (SAE) fully recovered. We did not observe an association between the learning curve, procedure duration, and the frequency or severity of postoperative complications. Conclusions: The presented results confirm the high safety of ESG in the treatment of obesity.

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is Intrathoracic Migration of the Sleeve of High Incidence?

BACKGROUND: Conversion of SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is increasing. Intrathoracic migration of the sleeve (ITM) often seems associated and is increasingly reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent a conversion of SG to RYGB from August 2013 to December 2022 were included. Two groups were compared: patients operated on for weight loss failure (WLF gp) and those operated on for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD gp). Demographic data, the incidence of ITM, weight loss outcomes, resolution of symptoms, and morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included with an average follow-up of 32 months: 46 patients in the GERD gp (78%) were compared to 13 patients (22%) in the WLF gp. Groups were comparable regarding age and gender, but BMI and commodities were significantly higher in the WLF gp. In the GERD gp, on preoperative gastroscopy, 30% had a esophagitis, 48% had an ITM which required a posterior crural closure versus no esophagitis (p=0.02) and 23% of ITM in the WLF gp (p=0.11). Conversion led to 93% of GERD symptom improvement. In the WLF gp, mean TWL% was 15.3%, significantly greater than in the GERD gp (TWL% = 4.6%, p = 0.01). The complication rate was 10% at 30 days and 3.4% after 30 days, not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: The main indication of conversion of SG to RYGB was because of GERD: in these indications, the incidence of ITM was high requiring a surgical treatment with a very good efficacy on symptoms. Weight loss results were disappointing.

First modified Delphi consensus statement on robotic-assisted da Vinci sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedure. Technical considerations related to the performance of SG are well established and reported in the literature but not in relation to robotic-assisted (RA) SG. We report the results of the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise addressing technical considerations of RA da Vinci (dV) SG. OBJECTIVES: Develop best practices for the performance of robotic-assisted da Vinci sleeve gastrectomy. SETTING: Survey based consensus statement. METHODS: A consensus building committee (CBC) was created comprising 10 experts in the field of RA surgery and MBS based on strict selection criteria. The CBC developed 49 consensus statements which were then shared with 240 experts in RA surgery. Our stopping criterion was stability in responses (≤15%). The consensus cut point was 70%. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49%. In the first round of voting, there was consensus agreement on 25 statements (51%), consensus disagreement on 14 (28%), and no consensus on the remaining statements (21%). In the second round of voting, we reached agreement on 3 additional statements. Experts recommended the use of the number of pauses generated by the stapler to guide choice of staple height (91.2%) and to upsize the staple height when using buttressing (92%). There was also consensus (81.4%) that the use of the closed staple height of 1.00 mm (white) is acceptable and that stapling of the antrum using a 1.5-mm staple (blue load) is also acceptable (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Collective expert opinion structured through a modified Delphi consensus statement presents a practical guide for surgeons interested in performing dV-SG.

Weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and single anastomosis duodenoileostomy following failed sleeve gastrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: While sleeve gastrectomy (SG) results in sustained weight loss for the majority of patients, some will experience inadequate weight loss or weight regain requiring revision. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in weight loss over time between patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or single anastomosis duodenoileostomy (SADI) after SG. METHODS: We queried a single institution's bariatrics registry to identify patients who underwent RYGB or SADI after previous SG over a three-year period. Demographics, operative characteristics, and post-operative complications were evaluated. Interval total body weight loss (TBWL) and excess body weight loss (EBWL) were calculated from available follow-ups within 2 years. RESULTS: We identified 124 patients who underwent conversion to RYGB (n = 61) or SADI (n = 63) following previous SG. There were no differences in sex, age, or medical comorbidities between groups. The median initial BMI was higher in the SADI group (44.9 vs. 41.9 for RYGB, p = 0.03) with greater excess body weight (56.7 vs. 64.3 kg, p = 0.04). The SADI group had a shorter median operative duration (157 vs. 182 min for RYGB, p < 0.01) and lower readmission rates (0 vs. 14.75%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in post-operative complications or need for rehydration therapy between the groups. Among 122 patients (98.4%) that had follow-up weights available, there were no differences in TBWL between groups. RYGB patients had a higher EBWL at 2, 3, and 6 months (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), but there were no differences between RYGB and SADI at 1 or 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both RYGB and SADI conversions proved effective for further weight loss following failed SG at our academic center. While neither demonstrated clear superiority in long-term (> 1 year) weight loss, RYGB's restrictive gastric pouch may explain its early weight loss advantage.

Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on body composition.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data with respect to body composition changes for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The objective of this study was to analyse changes in body composition between these two procedures during the first year after bariatric surgery. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in patients undergoing bariatric surgery at two tertiary hospitals between 2017 and 2023. Body composition was assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry immediately before surgery, and at 1-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-operatively, with a subgroup analysis performed for patients who undertook a scan at 18- and 24-months. Total weight loss (TWL), body mass index (BMI), fat mass (FM), lean body mass (LBM) and bone mineral content (BMC) parameters were compared between SG and RYGB. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included in this series (SG n = 30, RYGB n = 15). There was a significant reduction in mean %TWL of 26.94 ± 8.86% and mean BMI of 11.12 ± 3.70 kg/m2 over 12-months. LBM accounted for 17.8% of TWL over 12-months, SG and RYGB did not differ in terms of loss of FM or LBM. For both procedures, the loss of LBM appeared to plateau at 6-months post-operatively. The only statistically significant finding between the two procedures was that RYGB resulted in an additional 0.06 kg loss compared with SG. CONCLUSION: SG and RYGB have been shown to have comparable weight loss and body composition changes in the short-to-medium term following surgery. LBM reduction was most significant in the early post-operative period across the entire cohort.

Laparoscopic Removal of a Non-Adjustable Gastric Band and Conversion to a Gastric Sleeve: A Case Report.

Obesity has long been recognized as a global epidemic. One of the most effective treatments is bariatric surgery. Since the first modern procedure was reported, it has evolved over time, and multiple techniques have emerged. More than 20 years ago, one of the most widely used techniques was the non-adjustable gastric band (NAGB), which showed very promising short-term results. However, over time, it became apparent that it was not as effective in the long term. Associated gastrointestinal symptoms, such as reflux and constant vomiting, along with considerable weight regain, caused this technique to fall out of favor and be replaced by other procedures like the gastric sleeve (GS). Although the technique has fallen into disuse and is no longer recommended in the literature, there are still patients with associated complications. Few recent cases associated with these complications have been reported. Most undergo band removal, and whether to perform another procedure remains with limited evidence. We present the case of a patient who underwent an NAGB procedure 10 years ago and later experienced symptoms (reflux) and weight regain. She successfully underwent band removal and conversion to a GS at our institute in Mexico.

[ICG angiography is a safety standard in bariatric surgery]. / ICG-angiografiya kak standart bezopasnosti v bariatricheskoi khirurgii.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the specific characteristics of ICG-angiography during various bariatric interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 329 patients, with 105 (32%) undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), 98 (30%) undergoing mini-gastricbypass (MGB), 126 (38%) undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RGB). Intraoperative ICG angiography was perfomed on all patients at 'control points', the perfusion of the gastric stump was qualitatively and quantitatively assessed. RESULTS: Intraoperative ICG angiography shows that during LSG the angioarchitectonics in the area of the His angle are crucial. The presence of the posterior gastric artery of the gastric main type is a prognostically unfavorable risk factor for the development of ischemic complications. Therefore, to expand the gastric stump it is necessary to suture a 40Fr nasogastric tube and perform peritonization of the staple line. Statistical difference in blood supply at three points were found between and within the two groups of patients (Gis angle area, gastric body, pyloric region) with a p-value <0.001. During MGB, one of the important stages is applying the first (transverse) stapler cassette between the branches of the right and left gastric arteries. This maintains blood supply in anastomosis area, preventing immediate complications such as GEA failure, as well as long-term complications like atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and GEA stenosis. CONCLUSION: ICG angiography is a useful method for intraoperative assessment of angioarchitecture and perfusion of the gastric stump during bariatric surgery. This helps prevent tissue ischemia and reduce the risk of early and late postoperative complications.