Don't Let the Sun Rise on Small Bowel Obstruction Without Surgical Consultation-Redefining Nonoperative Management Pathways.

Introduction: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common cause of hospital admission leading to resource utilization. The majority of these patients require non-operative management (NOM) which can lead to increased length of stay (LOS), readmissions, resource utilization, and throughput delays. Early surgical consultation (SC) for SBO may improve efficiency and outcomes. Methods: We implemented an institution-wide intervention (INT) to encourage early SC (<1 day of diagnosis) for SBO patients in July 2022. A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with SBO requiring NOM from January 2021 to June 2023, categorized into pre- and post-INT groups. The primary outcome was the number of SC's and secondary outcomes were early SC (<1 day of diagnosis), utilization of SBFT, LOS, 30-day readmission, and costs of admission. Results: A total of 670 patients were included, 438 in the pre-INT and 232 in the post-INT group. Overall, SBFT utilization was significantly higher in cases with SC (17.2% vs 41.4%, P < .001). Post-INT patients were more likely to receive SC (94.0% vs 83.3%, P < .001) and increased SBFT utilization (47.0% vs 33.6%, P = .001). Additionally, early SC improved significantly in the post-INT group (74.3% vs 65.7%, P = .03). There was no difference in LOS between groups (4.0 vs 3.8 days, P = .48). There was a trend toward decreased readmission rates in the INT group at 30 days (7.3% vs 11.0%, P = .13) and reduced direct costs in the INT group (US$/admission = 8467 vs 8708, P = .1). Conclusion: Hospital-wide interventions to increase early surgical involvement proved effective by improving early SC, increased SBFT utilization, and showed a trend towards decreased readmission rates and direct costs.

Urinary excretion of low-osmolar contrast media during small-bowel follow-through studies in infants is not definitive evidence of bowel perforation.

BACKGROUND: Presence of contrast agent in the urinary system in infants after small-bowel follow-through study with low-osmolar contrast media has been described as a sign of bowel perforation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how often the presence of contrast agent in the bladder after small-bowel follow-through is a reliable sign of bowel perforation or necrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the radiology information system, we retrieved imaging reports of infants evaluated with small-bowel follow-through and findings of contrast agent in the bladder. We retrieved demographic and clinical information from the medical records. Presence of bladder contrast medium was considered true-positive evidence of bowel perforation or necrosis if confirmed by pneumoperitoneum, extraluminal contrast agent, surgery or pathology within 3 days of the small-bowel follow-through. False-positives for bowel perforation or necrosis were based on surgical findings or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 207 infants who had small-bowel follow-through, 18 infants (12 boys; mean age 50 days, range 14 days to 8.5 months) had contrast medium in the bladder after the small-bowel follow-through. Fifteen of the 18 (83.3%) had a history of prematurity and 11 had prior abdominal surgery. Four of the 18 (22.2%) had bowel perforation or necrosis at surgery or pathology performed more than 3 days after the small-bowel follow-through and were considered indeterminate and excluded. Eight of the remaining 14 infants (57.1%) had bowel perforation or necrosis based on surgical evidence of perforation or pathology confirmation of necrosis (n=6), pneumoperitoneum (n=1) or contrast agent leakage from enterocutaneous fistula (n=1). Six of the 14 (42.9%) were false-positives, without evidence of bowel perforation or necrosis based on clinical follow-up (n=4) or surgery (n=2). CONCLUSION: Demonstration of urinary contrast agent post small-bowel follow-through with low-osmolar contrast medium in newborns/infants with complex medical problems is not a definitive indication of bowel perforation or necrosis. More than one-third of our patients with contrast medium in the bladder did not have bowel perforation or necrosis.

Small Bowel Follow-Through: Treatment for Small Bowel Obstruction or Delaying the Inevitable?

BACKGROUND: Over 400,000 patients are admitted annually for small bowel obstruction (SBO), of which 20-40% require operative intervention, representing more than 2.3 billion dollars in healthcare expenses. Recurrence of SBO increases with a longer duration of follow-up with up to 15-20% recurrence rates within a five-year period. Small bowel follow-through (SBFT) consisting of serial X-rays with oral contrast has been shown to decrease overall length of stay (LOS) in patients with adhesive SBO. The aim of this study is to determine if SBFT administered to patients with SBO decreases 30-day and up to five-year readmission rates secondary to recurrent SBO. METHODS: The institutional review board (IRB) approved a single institution retrospective study from 2010 to 2020 that included a total of 742 patients. These patients were organized into groups of those who received the SBFT <24 hours after admission (n=40), those who received the SBFT >24 hours (n=198), and the third group of patients who did not receive the SBFT (n=658). Readmission rates <30 days, 70 years along with BMI <25, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, 35-39.9, >40, as well as the number of intraabdominal surgeries, gender, and need for operative intervention during the admission were evaluated to assess for any associations with recurrence. Readmission within 30 days and up to five years were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between groups with SBFT <24 hours (p=0.338) or SBFT >24 hours (p=0.889) when compared to the no SBFT group. There was nearly a 48% chance of readmission for another episode of an SBO for patients who did not undergo an operative intervention. While patients who underwent operative intervention had around a 29% chance of having a subsequent episode of an SBO. This is consistent with a statistically significant decrease in one-year (p=0.027) recurrences in patients who underwent operative intervention. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in recurrences with gender, most BMI groups, or in groups who underwent an SBFT. Operative intervention is associated with a statistically significant decrease in recurrence rates of SBO within one year of presentation.

Diatrizoate (Gastrograffin®) Small Bowel Follow Through for Small Bowel Obstructions: Timing and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The advent of the Gastrograffin® small bowel follow through (G-SBFT) has resulted in a decreased rate of operative intervention of small bowel obstructions (SBO); however, there is no data to suggest when G-SBFT should be performed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 548 patients, admitted to 1 of 9 hospitals with a diagnosis of SBO. Patients were divided into two categories with regards to timing of G-SBFT: before (early) or after (late) 48 hours from admission. Primary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total cost. Secondary outcomes were operative interventions and mortality. RESULTS: Of the reviewed patients, 71% had the G-SBFT ordered early. Comparing early versus late, there were no differences in patient characteristics with regards to age, sex, or BMI. There was a significant difference between LOS (4 vs 8 days, P < 0.05) and total cost ($17,056.19 vs $33,292.00, P < 0.05). There was no difference in mortality (1.3% vs 2.6%, P = 0.239) or 30-day readmission rates (15.6% vs 15.9%, P = 0.509). Patients in the early group underwent fewer operations (20.7% vs 31.9%, P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Patients that had a G-SBFT ordered early had a decreased LOS, total cost, and operative intervention. This suggests there is a benefit to ordering G-SBFT earlier in the hospital stay to reduce the overall disease burden, and that it is safe to do so with regards to mortality and readmissions. We therefore recommend ordering a G-SBFT within 48 hours to reduce LOS, cost, and need for an operation.

Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Intestinal Obstruction.

It is essential for the colon and rectal surgeon to understand the evaluation and management of patients with both small and large bowel obstructions. Computed tomography is usually the most appropriate and accurate diagnostic imaging modality for most suspected bowel obstructions. Additional commonly used imaging modalities include plain radiographs and contrast imaging/fluoroscopy, while less commonly utilized imaging modalities include ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Regardless of the imaging modality used, interpretation of imaging should involve a systematic, methodological approach to ensure diagnostic accuracy.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Small-Bowel Obstruction.

Small-bowel obstruction is a common cause of abdominal pain and accounts for a significant proportion of hospital admissions. Radiologic imaging plays the key role in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel obstruction as neither patient presentation, the clinical examination, nor laboratory testing are sufficiently sensitive or specific enough to diagnose or guide management. This document focuses on the imaging evaluation of the two most commonly encountered clinical scenarios related to small-bowel obstruction: the acute presentation and the more indolent, low-grade, or intermittent presentation. This document hopes to clarify the appropriate utilization of the many imaging procedures that are available and commonly employed in these clinical settings. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Radiographic measurement of intestinal length among children with short bowel syndrome: Retrospective determination remains problematic.

PURPOSE: Small bowel length is the most reliable predictor of enteral independence in pediatric short bowel syndrome. Retrospectively measured bowel lengths on upper GI with small bowel follow-through (UGI/SBFT) were compared to operative measurements. METHODS: A pediatric radiologist and surgical trainees blinded to operative measurements retrospectively analyzed UGI/SBFT studies using the digital radiography curved measurement tool. Children with SBS and severe intestinal failure (parenteral nutrition >90days) at a multidisciplinary intestinal failure program 2002-2015 were included. Data were expressed as median (Q1, Q3). RESULTS: Thirty-six children aged 0.8 (0.4, 3.7) years were analyzed. Fifty-six percent had intestinal malrotation, and 58% had prior serial transverse enteroplasty. Studies were conducted within 10 (7, 20) days of surgery. Intraoperative bowel length was 90cm (45, 142), while UGI/SBFT measurement by radiologist was 45cm (28, 63), with a mean difference of 47cm (SD 58cm, p<0.001) and a mean percent error of 50%. Radiographic assessment underestimated intestinal length in 83% of patients. CONCLUSION: Bowel length measured retrospectively from upper GI with small bowel follow-through studies usually underestimated intraoperative bowel length. The limits of agreement were too wide for this technique to be clinically useful. Operative measurement remains necessary to assess intestinal length and rehabilitation potential. TYPE OF STUDY: Study of Diagnostic Test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Diagnostic imaging and radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease.

Diagnostic imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However due to the relapsing nature of IBD, there is growing concern that IBD patients may be exposed to potentially harmful cumulative levels of ionising radiation in their lifetime, increasing malignant potential in a population already at risk. In this review we explore the proportion of IBD patients exposed to high cumulative radiation doses, the risk factors associated with higher radiation exposures, and we compare conventional diagnostic imaging with newer radiation-free imaging techniques used in the evaluation of patients with IBD. While computed tomography (CT) performs well as an imaging modality for IBD, the effective radiation dose is considerably higher than other abdominal imaging modalities. It is increasingly recognised that CT imaging remains responsible for the majority of diagnostic medical radiation to which IBD patients are exposed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and small intestine contrast enhanced ultrasonography (SICUS) have now emerged as suitable radiation-free alternatives to CT imaging, with comparable diagnostic accuracy. The routine use of MRI and SICUS for the clinical evaluation of patients with known or suspected small bowel Crohn's disease is to be encouraged wherever possible. More provision is needed for out-of-hours radiation-free imaging modalities to reduce the need for CT.

Comparison of gonadal radiation doses from CT enterography and small-bowel follow-through in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE. CT enterography is superior to small-bowel follow-through (SBFT) for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is widely assumed that the radiation dose from CT enterography is greater than that from SBFT in the pediatric patient. This study was designed to compare gonadal doses from CT enterography and SBFT to verify the best imaging choice for IBD evaluation in children. This study also challenges the assumption that CT enterography imparts a higher radiation dose through comparison of calculated radiation doses from CT enterography and SBFT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients 0-18 years old who underwent either CT enterography or SBFT over a 2-year period were included. The CT enterography group consisted of 39 boys and 51 girls, whereas the SBFT group consisted of 89 boys and 113 girls. CT enterography was performed at 120 kVp and approximately 132 mAs (range, 54-330 mAs) using weight-based protocols. SBFT used automated control of kilovoltage and tube current-exposure time product. Patient demographics and technical parameters were collected for CT enterography and SBFT, data were cross-paired between CT enterography and SBFT, and gonadal dose was calculated. RESULTS. Mean (± SD) CT enterography testis and ovarian doses were 0.93 ± 0.3 cGy (n = 39) and 0.64 ± 0.2 cGy (n = 51), respectively. Mean SBFT testis and ovarian doses were 2.3 ± 1.6 cGy (n = 89) and 1.49 ± 0.3 cGy (n = 113), respectively. Mean fluoroscopy time for SBFT was 2.6 ± 2 minutes. Gonadal dose for CT enterography was significantly lower than that for SBFT in boys and girls (p < 0.001). SBFT dose was lower in girls than boys (p < 0.001), whereas CT enterography dose was higher in boys than girls (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Gonadal dose for CT enterography was lower than that for SBFT for boys and girls of all sizes and age. Controlled exposure time made CT enterography dose more consistent, whereas the range of dose for SBFT was highly operator dependent and related to extent of disease. Thus, for IBD, CT enterography is preferred over SBFT for all children.

The potential applications of capsule endoscopy in pediatric patients compared with adult patients.

Capsule endoscopy (CE) avoids the ionizing radiation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia required by other imaging modalities, making it particularly valuable in the evaluation of gastrointestinal disease in pediatric patients. In examining the use of CE in pediatric and adult patients through a review of the literature, it was observed that CE is most frequently indicated for the evaluation of Crohn's disease (CD) in pediatric patients and most frequently indicated for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) in adults, although OGIB is a more frequent indication than CD in pediatric patients younger than 8 years of age. Diagnostic accuracy has been good and comparable to that of magnetic resonance enterography, and capsule retention rates as well as other adverse events appear to be low in pediatric patients. Research is needed to explore broader indications and applications of CE in the diagnosis and monitoring of gastrointestinal disease.

Optimising monitoring in the management of Crohn's disease: a physician's perspective.

Management of Crohn's disease has traditionally placed high value on subjective symptom assessment; however, it is increasingly appreciated that patient symptoms and objective parameters of inflammation can be disconnected. Therefore, strategies that objectively monitor inflammatory activity should be utilised throughout the disease course to optimise patient management. Initially, a thorough assessment of the severity, location and extent of disease is needed to ensure a correct diagnosis, identify any complications, help assess prognosis and select appropriate therapy. During follow-up, clinical decision-making should be driven by disease activity monitoring, with the aim of optimising treatment for tight disease control. However, few data exist to guide the choice of monitoring tools and the frequency of their use. Furthermore, adaption of monitoring strategies for symptomatic, asymptomatic and post-operative patients has not been well defined. The Annual excHangE on the ADvances in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD Ahead) 2011 educational programme, which included approximately 600 gastroenterologists from 36 countries, has developed practice recommendations for the optimal monitoring of Crohn's disease based on evidence and/or expert opinion. These recommendations address the need to incorporate different modalities of disease assessment (symptom and endoscopic assessment, measurement of biomarkers of inflammatory activity and cross-sectional imaging) into robust monitoring. Furthermore, the importance of measuring and recording parameters in a standardised fashion to enable longitudinal evaluation of disease activity is highlighted.

Small intestine contrast ultrasonography in pediatric Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of small intestine contrast ultrasonography (SICUS) in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 51 consecutive patients (median age 15 years; range 3-20, 31 male patients), 21 with suspected and 30 with proven CD, were studied. All patients underwent standard ultrasonography (ie, transabdominal ultrasonography [TUS]), SICUS, small bowel follow-through, and upper and lower endoscopy. SICUS was performed in patients after they ingested an oral contrast solution. TUS and SICUS were compared with small bowel follow-through and endoscopy via use of the final diagnosis as reference standard. RESULTS: In undiagnosed patients, the sensitivity and specificity of TUS and SICUS in detecting CD small bowel lesions were 75% and 100% and 100% and 100%, respectively. In patients with proven CD, the sensitivity and specificity of TUS and SICUS were 76% and 100% and 96% and 100%, respectively. The agreement (k) with radiology for site of lesions was almost perfect for SICUS (0.93), both for jejunal and ileal lesions, and it was fair (0.40) for jejunal and substantial (0.68) for ileal lesions for TUS. Compared with radiology SICUS correctly assessed the length of lesions, whereas TUS underestimated it (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The radiation-free technique SICUS is comparable with radiology and more accurate than TUS in assessing small bowel lesions in pediatric CD, mainly in the detection of proximal small bowel disease.

Small bowel obstruction: early parameters predicting the need for surgical intervention.

AIM: To study and identify early clinical and radiological findings that could help to predict operative intervention for small bowel obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and nine consecutive patients with small bowel obstruction who underwent small bowel follow-through examination with Gastrografin(®) during 2005-2006. The patients were divided into an operative group and a non-operative group, n = 44 and 65, respectively. Findings primarily noted were those which were possible to register within 1-4 h from hospital arrival. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, factors found to be significantly associated with surgical intervention were no prior abdominal surgery, the presence of radiological differential air fluid levels, and absence of flatulence 24 h prior to admission, CRP > 10 mg/L and dehydration at admission. In multivariate analyses, the presence of dehydration and radiological differentiated air fluid levels were independent predictive factors of significance. Absence of all factors significantly favored non-operative treatment, while operative treatment was significantly favored when two or more factors were present. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of two or more early predictive factors as defined above, available at admission, significantly correlates with a likelihood of complete obstruction and the need of surgical intervention.

Radiographic and endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of enterocutaneous fistulas.

The management of enterocutaneous fistulas continues to be a challenging postoperative complication. Understanding the anatomy of the fistula optimizes its evaluation and management. Diagnostic radiology has always played an important role in this task. The use of plain radiography with contrasted studies and fistulograms is well documented in the earliest investigations of fistulas and they continue to be helpful techniques. The imaging techniques have evolved rapidly over the past 15 years with the introduction of cross-sectional imaging, ultrasound and endoscopy. The purpose of this chapter is to review both the diagnostic and therapeutic roles of fistulograms, small bowel follow-through, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and endoscopy in the setting of acquired enterocutaneous fistulas.

The diagnosis of Crohn's disease of the small bowel: comparing CT enterography, capsule endoscopy, small-bowel follow through and ileocolonoscopy / 中华内科杂志

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy (CE), CT enterography (CTE), ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow through (SBFT) for small bowel Crohn's disease (CD). Methods Fifty-seven consecutive patients with CD underwent ileocolonoscopy, CTE, CE, and SBFT. It included the presence of the following symptoms and signs: abdominal pain, weight loss,diarrhea, fever and positive fecal occult blood test. The location and the characteristics of intestinal and extra-intestinal lesions detected by four techniquks were compared. The proportions of patients with positive findings using each examination were compared. Results Of the 57 patients, 50 underwent ileocolonoscopy, terminal ileum lesion was found in 33 patients (66. 00% ), the remaining 17 (34.0%)were normal; among 34 patients who had CTE, 29 of small bowel lesion were found (85. 29% ); CE were performed in 27 patients, due to prolonged gastric transit one time, the capsule did not reach the cecum in one patient during battery lifetime. CE showed small bowel lesion in 26 patients (96.30% ); SBF was performed in 39 patients and 26 of small bowel lesion were detected (66. 67% ). CE had the highest diagnostic yield for CD and ileocolonoscopy had the lowest, and there were statistically significant difference among the 4 examinations (P = 0. 006 ). The combinded positive rates of two methods were: CE + CTE 92. 86% (13/14), SBFT + CTE 90. 91% (20/22), CE + ileocolonoscopy 95. 65% (22/23), CE + SBFT100% (17/17), ileocolonoscopy + CTE 89. 66% ( 26/29 ), ileocolonoscopy + SBFT 77.78% ( 28/36 ), but there were no significant differences between each two examinations. Conclusion CE, CTE have a higher yield in depicting mild to moderate finding of CD than SBFT. CE is better for assessing early mucosal disease,whereas CTE is better for detecting transmural and extraluminal abnormalities. Most important, CE plus CTE may depict nonobstructive CD of the small bowel when conventional techniques such as ileocolonoscopy or SBFF have negative or inconclusive finding. CE provides us explanations for the symptoms of patients, decision to follow up or therapy.