ABSTRACT
Chemical senses such as odor, taste and appearance are directly related with appetite. Understanding the relation between appetite and flavor is getting more important due to increasing number of obese patients worldwide. The literature on the studies investigating the change in olfactory abilities and gustatory sensitivity mostly performed using food-related odors and tastes rather than standardized tests were developed to study olfaction and gustation. Therefore, results are inconsistent and the relationship between olfactory and gustatory sensitivity with respect to the actual state of human satiety is still not completely understood. Here, for the first time in literature, we investigated the change in both olfactory abilities and gustatory sensitivity in hunger and in satiety using 123 subjects (37 men, 86 women; mean age 31.4 years, age range 21-41 years). The standardized Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test and Taste Strips were used for olfactory testing and gustatory sensitivity, respectively. TDI score (range 1-48) was calculated as the collective scores of odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D) and odor identification (I). The evaluation was performed in two successive days where the hunger state of test subjects was confirmed by blood glucose test strips (mean blood glucose level 90.0 ± 5.6 mg/dl in hunger and 131.4 ± 8.1 mg/dl in satiety). The results indicated statistically significant decrease in olfaction in satiety compared to hunger (mean TDI 39.3 ± 1.1 in hunger, 37.4 ± 1.1 in satiety, p < 0.001). The comparison of gustatory sensitivity indicated significantly higher sensitivity to sweet, sour and salty in hunger (p < 0.001), but significantly higher sensitivity to bitter tastant in satiety (p < 0.001). With this prospective study, we were able to show that both olfactory abilities and gustatory sensitivity were affected by hunger state.
Subject(s)
Hunger/physiology , Satiety Response/physiology , Smell/physiology , Taste/physiology , Adult , Female , Finland , Humans , Male , Olfactometry/methods , Olfactory Perception/physiology , Prospective Studies , Taste Perception/physiologyABSTRACT
Introducción: Para acceder a la región selar, podemos utilizar las técnicas transcraneal, transeptal, o transnasal endoscópica, pudiendo provocar diferentes grados de hiposmia. Se ha descrito menor morbilidad al utilizar la técnica endoscópica, pero faltan estudios dirigidos a los resultados olfatorios. Objetivo: Determinar la presencia de deterioro olfatorio en los pacientes sometidos a un abordaje transnasal endoscópico. Material y método: Se reclutaron 12 pacientes con tumores en la región selar durante 8 meses. Se les realizó un test de olfato preoperatorio, fueron intervenidos mediante abordaje transnasal endoscópico y controlados al mes posoperatorio. Resultados: Se logró seguimiento a 10 pacientes. Seis (60%) presentaron un test de olfato preoperatorio normal. Al mes posoperatorio, se constató mejoría olfatoria en 1 (10%) paciente, 8 (80%) se mantuvieron en la misma categoría y 1 (10%) presentó deterioro olfatorio. En suma, 9 de 10 pacientes (90%) mantienen o mejoran su olfato al mes posoperatorio. Conclusión: Nuestros resultados sugieren que el abordaje transnasal endoscópico utilizado en este estudio no produce deterioro olfatorio. Dado que además es una técnica de abordaje efectiva y relativamente segura, consideramos que constituye una alternativa factible para utilizar en pacientes con patología tumoral en la región selar.
Introduction: To access the sellar region we can use the transcranial, transeptal, or transnasal endoscopic approaches, which may cause different degrees of hyposmia. It has described less morbidity to use the endocopic technique, however, there are few studies directed at olfactory outcomes. Aim: To determine the presence of olfactory impairment secondary to endoscopic transnasal approach. Material and method: 12 patients with tumors in the sellar region were enrolled during 8 months. They were underwent a smell test preoperatively, operated by endoscopic transnasal approach, and controlled with postoperative retesting, after one month. Results: Follow-up was achieved to 10 patients. 6 (60%) presented a normal preoperative smell test. Within one postoperative month, olfactory improvement was found in 1 (10%) patient, 8 (80%) remained in the same category and 1 (10%) had olfactory impairment. In all, 9 out of 10 patients (90%) maintain or improve their sense of smell after surgery. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the transnasal endoscopic approach used in this study, doesn't produce olfactory impairment. Given that is also an effective and relatively safe approach, we believe that is a feasible alternative for use in patients with tumor pathology in the sellar region.
