ABSTRACT
AIM: To determine the best option for bowel preparation [sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol (PEG)] for elective colonoscopy in adult outpatients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines was performed using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Central, Cinahl and Lilacs. No restrictions were placed for country, year of publication or language. The last search in the literature was performed on November 20th, 2017. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included. The subjects included were adult outpatients who underwent bowel cleansing for elective colonoscopy. The included studies compared sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and PEG for bowel preparation. Exclusion criteria were the inclusion of inpatients or groups with specific conditions, failure to mention patient status (outpatient or inpatient) or dietary restrictions, and permission to have unrestricted diet on the day prior to the exam. Primary outcomes were bowel cleaning success and/or tolerability of colon preparation. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates. Data on intention-to-treat were extracted by two independent authors and risk of bias assessed through the Jadad scale. Funnel plots, Egger's test, Higgins' test (I 2) and sensitivity analyses were used to assess reporting bias and heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by computing risk difference (RD) using Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method with fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) version 6.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration) was the software chosen to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: 662 records were identified but only 16 trials with 6200 subjects were included for the meta-analysis. High heterogeneity among studies was found and sensitivity analysis was needed and performed to interpret data. In the pooled analysis, SPMC was better for bowel cleaning [MH FE, RD 0.03, IC (0.01, 0.05), P = 0.003, I 2 = 33%, NNT 34], for tolerability [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.03, 0.13), P = 0.002, I 2 = 88%, NNT 13] and for adverse events [MH RE, RD 0.13, IC (0.05, 0.22), P = 0.002, I 2 = 88%, NNT 7]. There was no difference in regard to polyp and adenoma detection rates. Additional analyses were made by subgroups (type of regimen, volume of PEG solution and dietary recommendations). SPMC demonstrated better tolerability levels when compared to PEG in the following subgroups: "day-before preparation" [MH FE, RD 0.17, IC (0.13, 0.21), P < 0.0001, I 2 = 0%, NNT 6], "preparation in accordance with time interval for colonoscopy" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.15), P = 0.02, I 2 = 54%, NNT 13], when compared to "high-volume PEG solutions" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.14), I 2 = 89%, P = 0.02, NNT 13] and in the subgroup "liquid diet on day before" [MH RE, RD 0.14, IC (0.06,0.22), P = 0.0006, I 2 = 81%, NNT 8]. SPMC was also found to cause fewer adverse events than PEG in the "high-volume PEG solutions" [MH RE, RD -0.18, IC (-0.30, -0.07), P = 0.002, I 2 = 79%, NNT 6] and PEG in the "low-residue diet" subgroup [MH RE, RD -0.17, IC (-0.27, 0.07), P = 0.0008, I 2 = 86%, NNT 6]. CONCLUSION: SPMC seems to be better than PEG for bowel preparation, with a similar bowel cleaning success rate, better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse events.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Colonoscopy plays an essential role in the therapeutic and diagnostic approach in various colonic pathologies, the aim of the present study was to compare three solutions and their efficacy for the bowel preparation in adult patients submitted to elective colonoscopy. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly divided into three groups of 20 each. Each group was submitted to a bowel preparation with one of the following solutions: 10 percent manitol, sodium picosulphate or sodium phosphate. The parameters evaluated were: taste, tolerance, associated side effects and quality of cleansing. Postural blood pressure and pulse rate as well as serum sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphate were compared. RESULTS: Sodium phosphate and 10 percent manitol solutions provided superior results in terms of colon cleansing compared to sodium picosulphate solution. All serum electrolytes evaluated were significantly altered in the three groups, without important clinical signs. DISCUSSION: High levels of serum phosphate were the most striking alteration in patients prepared with sodium phosphate solution, again with no clinical signs. Variations related to blood pressure and pulse rate suggested contraction of intravascular volume, with no clinical effects. CONCLUSION: Sodium phosphate and 10 percent manitol solutions are equivalent in providing good quality colon cleansing, with no significant side effects that could compromise the procedure.
INTRODUÇÃO: A colonoscopia é exame fundamental na avaliação das doenças do cólon e na abordagem terapêutica de determinado grupo de patologias. O preparo intestinal é obrigatório para a realização das colonoscopias eletivas, e a qualidade encontra-se relacionada ao sucesso do procedimento. Comparou-se três soluções para limpeza anterógrada do cólon em pacientes adultos, submetidos à colonoscopia. METODOS: Sessenta pacientes foram distribuídos em três grupos de vinte. Cada grupo realizou o preparo do cólon com uma das três soluções estudadas: manitol a 10 por cento (MN), picossulfato sódico (PS) e fosfato monobásico e dibásico de sódio (NaP). O sabor, a tolerância, os efeitos colaterais, os custos e a qualidade de limpeza do preparo foram avaliados. Frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial sistêmica foram analisados. Variações dos eletrólitos foram dosados antes e após o preparo. RESULTADOS: Os resultados foram semelhantes em relação aos efeitos colaterais. O sabor da solução de NaP não chegou a comprometer a sua aceitação. DISCUSSÃO: Soluções de NaP e MN proporcionaram resultados superiores tanto em qualidade de limpeza colônica, como em relação aos custos, quando comparadas à solução de PS. CONCLUSÃO: Comparados os três, os eletrólitos avaliados apresentaram diferenças significativas, sendo a hiperfosfatemia dos pacientes com a solução de NaP, a mais importante.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Cathartics/therapeutic use , Colonoscopy/methods , Mannitol/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Picolines/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/standards , Diuretics, Osmotic/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Solutions/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Colonoscopy plays an essential role in the therapeutic and diagnostic approach in various colonic pathologies, the aim of the present study was to compare three solutions and their efficacy for the bowel preparation in adult patients submitted to elective colonoscopy. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly divided into three groups of 20 each. Each group was submitted to a bowel preparation with one of the following solutions: 10 percent manitol, sodium picosulphate or sodium phosphate. The parameters evaluated were: taste, tolerance, associated side effects and quality of cleansing. Postural blood pressure and pulse rate as well as serum sodium, potassium, calcium and phosphate were compared. RESULTS: Sodium phosphate and 10 percent manitol solutions provided superior results in terms of colon cleansing compared to sodium picosulphate solution. All serum electrolytes evaluated were significantly altered in the three groups, without important clinical signs. DISCUSSION: High levels of serum phosphate were the most striking alteration in patients prepared with sodium phosphate solution, again with no clinical signs. Variations related to blood pressure and pulse rate suggested contraction of intravascular volume, with no clinical effects. CONCLUSION: Sodium phosphate and 10 percent manitol solutions are equivalent in providing good quality colon cleansing, with no significant side effects that could compromise the procedure.(AU)
INTRODUÇÃO: A colonoscopia é exame fundamental na avaliação das doenças do cólon e na abordagem terapêutica de determinado grupo de patologias. O preparo intestinal é obrigatório para a realização das colonoscopias eletivas, e a qualidade encontra-se relacionada ao sucesso do procedimento. Comparou-se três soluções para limpeza anterógrada do cólon em pacientes adultos, submetidos à colonoscopia. METODOS: Sessenta pacientes foram distribuídos em três grupos de vinte. Cada grupo realizou o preparo do cólon com uma das três soluções estudadas: manitol a 10 por cento (MN), picossulfato sódico (PS) e fosfato monobásico e dibásico de sódio (NaP). O sabor, a tolerância, os efeitos colaterais, os custos e a qualidade de limpeza do preparo foram avaliados. Frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial sistêmica foram analisados. Variações dos eletrólitos foram dosados antes e após o preparo. RESULTADOS: Os resultados foram semelhantes em relação aos efeitos colaterais. O sabor da solução de NaP não chegou a comprometer a sua aceitação. DISCUSSÃO: Soluções de NaP e MN proporcionaram resultados superiores tanto em qualidade de limpeza colônica, como em relação aos custos, quando comparadas à solução de PS. CONCLUSÃO: Comparados os três, os eletrólitos avaliados apresentaram diferenças significativas, sendo a hiperfosfatemia dos pacientes com a solução de NaP, a mais importante.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Cathartics/therapeutic use , Colonoscopy/methods , Mannitol/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Picolines/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/standards , Diuretics, Osmotic/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Solutions/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Currently, colonoscopy has been a first choice exam to evaluate colon disease. This procedure also has had essencial role in the therapeutic approach of certain groups of pathologies. Colonic cleansing is a necessary and previous stage to do elective colonoscopy. The quality of the colon preparation has been found related directly to the sucess of procedure. Three solutions were compared as colonic cleansing agents in adult patients submitted to colonoscopy at ambulatory regimen. Sixty patients were randomized and then divided into three groups of twenty persons. Each one of these groups was submitted to a colonic cleansing with one of these studied solutions: 10% mannitol solution, sodium picosulphate and sodium phosphate. Taste, tolerance, associated side effects and quality of cleansing preparation were evaluated. Clinic parameters like standing pulse and blood pressure besides the assessment of sodium, potassium, calcium and phophate were also studied and compared with measurements taken before and after bow el preparation of each one of patients. The groups presented similar results when related to side effects. Electrolyte alterations were verified in these three studied groups without clinical signs. The variations related to cardiac frequency, blood pressure and hematocrit, though showing contraction of the intravascular volume, did not attend with clinic effects. The bad taste of sodium phosphate solution did not compromise its tolerance. The sodium phosphate and 10% mannitol solutions provide superior results in quality of colonic cleansing and as much as costs when compared to sodium picosulphate solution. When these three groups were compared all evaluated electrolytes presented significant differences and hyperphosphatemia of patients prepared with sodium phosphate solution was the most important of then. None of these differences was related to clinic effects.
Atualmente, a colonoscopia é o exame de primeira escolha na avaliação das doenças do cólon, tendo também papel fundamental na abordagem terapêutica de determinado grupo de patologias. O preparo intestinal é etapa obrigatória para a realização das colonoscopias eletivas, e a qualidade deste encontra-se diretamente relacionada ao sucesso do procedimento, seja este diagnóstico ou terapêutico. Foram comparadas três soluções para limpeza anterógrada do cólon em pacientes adultos, submetidos à colonoscopia em regime ambulatorial. Sessenta pacientes foram distribuidos em três grupos de vinte indivíduos. Cada um dos grupos realizou o preparo do cólon com uma das três soluções estudadas: manitol a 10% (MN), picossulfato sódico (PS) e fosfato monobásico e dibásico de sódio (NaP). O sabor, a tolerância, os efeitos colaterais, os custos e a qualidade de limpeza do preparo foram avaliados. Parâmetros clínicos como frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial sistêmica também foram estudados, além das variações dos eletrólitos (sódio, potássio, cálcio e fósforo) que foram dosados antes e após o preparo intestinal. Os pacientes estudados apresentaram resultados semelhantes em relação aos efeitos colaterais. As variações relativas à freqüência cardíaca, pressão arterial e hematócrito, ainda que indicando contração no espaço intravascular, não cursaram com maiores repercussões do ponto de vista clínico. O sabor ruim da solução de NaP não chegou a comprometer a aceitação desta pelos pacientes. As soluções de NaP e MN proporcionaram resultados superiores tanto em qualidade de limpeza colônica, como em relação aos custos, quando comparadas à solução de PS. Quando comparados os três grupos do estudo, todos os eletrólitos avaliados apresentaram diferenças significativas, sendo a hiperfosfatemia dos pacientes preparados com a solução de NaP, a mais importante delas. Nenhuma dessas, no entanto, apresentou problemas de ordem clínica.
ABSTRACT
Currently, colonoscopy has been a first choice exam to evaluate colon disease. This procedure also has had essencial role in the therapeutic approach of certain groups of pathologies. Colonic cleansing is a necessary and previous stage to do elective colonoscopy. The quality of the colon preparation has been found related directly to the sucess of procedure. Three solutions were compared as colonic cleansing agents in adult patients submitted to colonoscopy at ambulatory regimen. Sixty patients were randomized and then divided into three groups of twenty persons. Each one of these groups was submitted to a colonic cleansing with one of these studied solutions: 10% mannitol solution, sodium picosulphate and sodium phosphate. Taste, tolerance, associated side effects and quality of cleansing preparation were evaluated. Clinic parameters like standing pulse and blood pressure besides the assessment of sodium, potassium, calcium and phophate were also studied and compared with measurements taken before and after bow el preparation of each one of patients. The groups presented similar results when related to side effects. Electrolyte alterations were verified in these three studied groups without clinical signs. The variations related to cardiac frequency, blood pressure and hematocrit, though showing contraction of the intravascular volume, did not attend with clinic effects. The bad taste of sodium phosphate solution did not compromise its tolerance. The sodium phosphate and 10% mannitol solutions provide superior results in quality of colonic cleansing and as much as costs when compared to sodium picosulphate solution. When these three groups were compared all evaluated electrolytes presented significant differences and hyperphosphatemia of patients prepared with sodium phosphate solution was the most important of then. None of these differences was related to clinic effects.
Atualmente, a colonoscopia é o exame de primeira escolha na avaliação das doenças do cólon, tendo também papel fundamental na abordagem terapêutica de determinado grupo de patologias. O preparo intestinal é etapa obrigatória para a realização das colonoscopias eletivas, e a qualidade deste encontra-se diretamente relacionada ao sucesso do procedimento, seja este diagnóstico ou terapêutico. Foram comparadas três soluções para limpeza anterógrada do cólon em pacientes adultos, submetidos à colonoscopia em regime ambulatorial. Sessenta pacientes foram distribuidos em três grupos de vinte indivíduos. Cada um dos grupos realizou o preparo do cólon com uma das três soluções estudadas: manitol a 10% (MN), picossulfato sódico (PS) e fosfato monobásico e dibásico de sódio (NaP). O sabor, a tolerância, os efeitos colaterais, os custos e a qualidade de limpeza do preparo foram avaliados. Parâmetros clínicos como frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial sistêmica também foram estudados, além das variações dos eletrólitos (sódio, potássio, cálcio e fósforo) que foram dosados antes e após o preparo intestinal. Os pacientes estudados apresentaram resultados semelhantes em relação aos efeitos colaterais. As variações relativas à freqüência cardíaca, pressão arterial e hematócrito, ainda que indicando contração no espaço intravascular, não cursaram com maiores repercussões do ponto de vista clínico. O sabor ruim da solução de NaP não chegou a comprometer a aceitação desta pelos pacientes. As soluções de NaP e MN proporcionaram resultados superiores tanto em qualidade de limpeza colônica, como em relação aos custos, quando comparadas à solução de PS. Quando comparados os três grupos do estudo, todos os eletrólitos avaliados apresentaram diferenças significativas, sendo a hiperfosfatemia dos pacientes preparados com a solução de NaP, a mais importante delas. Nenhuma dessas, no entanto, apresentou problemas de ordem clínica.