Effect of tinnitus on sound localization ability in patients with normal hearing

Abstract Objectives To determine whether tinnitus negatively impacts the accuracy of sound source localization in participants with normal hearing. Methods Seventy-five participants with tinnitus and 74 without tinnitus were enrolled in this study. The accuracy of sound source discrimination on the horizontal plane was compared between the two participant groups. The test equipment consisted of 37 loudspeakers arranged in a 180° arc facing forward with 5° intervals between them. The stimuli were pure tones of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz at 50 dB SPL. The stimuli were divided into three groups: low frequency (LF: 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz), 2 kHz, and high frequency (HF: 4 and 8 kHz) stimuli. Results The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) score of all the stimuli in the tinnitus group was significantly higher than that in the control group (13.45 ± 3.34 vs. 11.44 ± 2.56, p = 4.115, t < 0.001). The RMSE scores at LF, 2 kHz, and HF were significantly higher in the tinnitus group than those in the control group (LF: 11.66 ± 3.62 vs. 10.04 ± 3.13, t = 2.918, p = 0.004; 2 kHz: 16.63 ± 5.45 vs. 14.43 ± 4.52, t = 2.690, p = 0.008; HF: 13.42 ± 4.74 vs. 11.14 ± 3.68, t = 3.292, p = 0.001). Thus, the accuracy of sound source discrimination in participants with tinnitus was significantly worse than that in those without tinnitus, despite the stimuli frequency. There was no difference in the ability to localize the sound of the matched frequency and other frequencies (12.86 ± 6.29 vs. 13.87 ± 3.14, t = 1.204, p = 0.236). Additionally, there was no correlation observed between the loudness of tinnitus and RMSE scores (r = 0.096, p = 0.434), and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and RMSE scores (r = −0.056, p = 0.648). Conclusions Our present data suggest that tinnitus negatively impacted sound source localization accuracy, even when participants had normal hearing. The matched pitch and loudness and the impact of tinnitus on patients' daily lives were not related to the sound source localization ability. Level of evidence 4.

Effect of tinnitus on sound localization ability in patients with normal hearing.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether tinnitus negatively impacts the accuracy of sound source localization in participants with normal hearing. METHODS: Seventy-five participants with tinnitus and 74 without tinnitus were enrolled in this study. The accuracy of sound source discrimination on the horizontal plane was compared between the two participant groups. The test equipment consisted of 37 loudspeakers arranged in a 180° arc facing forward with 5° intervals between them. The stimuli were pure tones of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8kHz at 50dB SPL. The stimuli were divided into three groups: low frequency (LF: 0.25, 0.5, and 1kHz), 2kHz, and high frequency (HF: 4 and 8kHz) stimuli. RESULTS: The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) score of all the stimuli in the tinnitus group was significantly higher than that in the control group (13.45±3.34 vs. 11.44±2.56, p=4.115, t<0.001). The RMSE scores at LF, 2kHz, and HF were significantly higher in the tinnitus group than those in the control group (LF: 11.66±3.62 vs. 10.04±3.13, t=2.918, p=0.004; 2kHz: 16.63±5.45 vs. 14.43±4.52, t=2.690, p=0.008; HF: 13.42±4.74 vs. 11.14 ±3.68, t=3.292, p=0.001). Thus, the accuracy of sound source discrimination in participants with tinnitus was significantly worse than that in those without tinnitus, despite the stimuli frequency. There was no difference in the ability to localize the sound of the matched frequency and other frequencies (12.86±6.29 vs. 13.87±3.14, t=1.204, p=0.236). Additionally, there was no correlation observed between the loudness of tinnitus and RMSE scores (r=0.096, p=0.434), and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and RMSE scores (r=-0.056, p=0.648). CONCLUSIONS: Our present data suggest that tinnitus negatively impacted sound source localization accuracy, even when participants had normal hearing. The matched pitch and loudness and the impact of tinnitus on patients' daily lives were not related to the sound source localization ability.

3D Multiple Sound Source Localization by Proposed T-Shaped Circular Distributed Microphone Arrays in Combination with GEVD and Adaptive GCC-PHAT/ML Algorithms.

Multiple simultaneous sound source localization (SSL) is one of the most important applications in the speech signal processing. The one-step algorithms with the advantage of low computational complexity (and low accuracy), and the two-step methods with high accuracy (and high computational complexity) are proposed for multiple SSL. In this article, a combination of one-step-based method based on the generalized eigenvalue decomposition (GEVD), and a two-step-based method based on the adaptive generalized cross-correlation (GCC) by using the phase transform/maximum likelihood (PHAT/ML) filters along with a novel T-shaped circular distributed microphone array (TCDMA) is proposed for 3D multiple simultaneous SSL. In addition, the low computational complexity advantage of the GCC algorithm is considered in combination with the high accuracy of the GEVD method by using the distributed microphone array to eliminate spatial aliasing and thus obtain more appropriate information. The proposed T-shaped circular distributed microphone array-based adaptive GEVD and GCC-PHAT/ML algorithms (TCDMA-AGGPM) is compared with hierarchical grid refinement (HiGRID), temporal extension of multiple response model of sparse Bayesian learning with spherical harmonic (SH) extension (SH-TMSBL), sound field morphological component analysis (SF-MCA), and time-frequency mixture weight Bayesian nonparametric acoustical holography beamforming (TF-MW-BNP-AHB) methods based on the mean absolute estimation error (MAEE) criteria in noisy and reverberant environments on simulated and real data. The superiority of the proposed method is presented by showing the high accuracy and low computational complexity for 3D multiple simultaneous SSL.