[Study on the consistency between CBCT image features of sphenopalatine foramen and those seen in nasal endoscopy].

Objective:To study the clinical anatomy of the sphenopalatine foramina by dissecting the sphenopalatine foramina during Vidian nerve branch neurotomy. The anatomy and CBCT images of sphenopalatine foramen were analyzed to facilitate the navigational of clinical operation using CBCT images. Methods:From October 2017 to September 2023, 84 cases（168 sides） of Vidian nerve branch neurotomy in our department were collected. The clinical summary was made according to the anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen during the operation. Preoperative CBCT imaging findings of the sphenopalatine foramina were also studied. Results:The clinical anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen could be divided into four types: middle meatus type（1.19%）, trans-meatus type（62.29%）, superior meatus type（33.33%） and double foramen type（1.19%）. The incidence of ethmoidal ridge was 98.81%. The distance from sphenopalatine foramina to posterior nasal canal were（14.63±2.66） mm to left and（14.65±2.63） mm to right, The position Angle ∠a of lower margin of sphenopalatine foramina were（62.36±10.05）° to left and（61.51±11.82）° to right, respectively. Axial CT images can be used to divide the sphenopalatine foramen into five levels: the upper edge of the sphenopalatine foramen level, the Vidian nerve level, the basal plate interaction level, the lower edge of the sphenopalatine foramen level and the pterygopalatine canal level. The agreement between endoscopic anatomy of sphenopalatine foramen and imaging navigation was 100%. Conclusion:The sphenopalatine foramina exhibit various anatomical types. The preoperative navigational CBCT reading can effectively identify the type of sphenopalatine foramina, guide the choice of surgical method, and help avoid serious complications. This has significant clinical application value.

Comparison of Greater Occipital Nerve Blockade and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Patients with Episodic Migraine.

Objectives: Compare the effects of greater occipital nerve (GON) and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blocks on headache intensity and duration, number of headache days, and disability in patients with episodic migraine. Methods: In this prospective single-blind randomized study, patients with episodic migraine were randomly divided into two groups: GON and SPG block groups. Patients received blocks once a week for 4 weeks, and once a month for 2 months. The number of headache days, the headache duration, numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, and number of acute medical treatments were assessed before the procedures and 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after the procedures. Disability was evaluated using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire at baseline and 3 months after treatment. This study protocol is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06243874.). Results: 19 patients in the GON block group and 18 patients in the SPG block group were evaluated. Significant improvements in pain severity, headache duration, number of headache days, and the need for acute medical treatment were observed in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd months compared to baseline in the two groups (p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in the MIDAS scores in the third month (p < 0.001). The GON block group showed a greater reduction in headache intensity, duration, number of headache days, and MIDAS scores compared to the SPG block group in the 3rd month (p < 0.001). Conclusions: GON block reduces headache duration, intensity, the number of headache days, and the need for acute medical treatment much more than SPG block in patients with episodic migraine.

Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation: a comprehensive evaluation across diseases in randomized controlled trials.

Background: Current literature extensively covers the use of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation (SPGs) in treating a broad spectrum of medical conditions, such as allergic rhinitis, cluster headaches, and strokes. Nevertheless, a discernible gap in the systematic organization and analysis of these studies is evident. This paper aims to bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive review and analysis of existing literature on SPGs across various medical conditions. Methods: This study meticulously constructed a comprehensive database through systematic computerized searches conducted on PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM up to May 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in either Chinese or English, focusing on the therapeutic applications of SPGs for various medical conditions. Both qualitative and quantitative outcome indicators were considered eligible for inclusion. Results: This comprehensive study reviewed 36 publications, comprising 10 high-quality, 23 medium-quality, and three low-quality articles. The study investigated various diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), ischemic strokes (IS), cluster headache (CH), primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN), pediatric chronic secretory otitis (PCSO), refractory facial paralysis (RFP), chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), as well as the analysis of low-frequency sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation (LF-SPGs) in chronic cluster headache (CCH) and the impact of SPGs on Normal nasal cavity function (NNCF). SPGs demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of AR. Regarding the improvement of rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores, SPGs are considered the optimal intervention according to the SUCRA ranking. Concerning the improvement in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Conventional Acupuncture Combined with Tradiational Chinese Medicine (CA-TCM) holds a significant advantage in the SUCRA ranking and is deemed the best intervention. In terms of increasing Effective Rate (ER), SPGs outperformed both conventional acupuncture (CA) and Western Medicine (WM; P < 0.05). In the context of SPGs treatment for IS, the results indicate a significant improvement in the 3-month outcomes, as evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in the context of Cerebral Cortical Infarction (CCI; P < 0.05). In the treatment of CH with SPGs, the treatment has been shown to have a statistically significant effect on the relief and disappearance of headaches (P < 0.05). The impact of SPGs on NNCF reveals statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) in nasal airway resistance (NAR), nasal cavity volume (NCV), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), substance P (SP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY). SPGs treatments for PCSO, RFP, and CTTH, when compared to control groups, yielded statistically significant results (P < 0.05). Conclusion: SPGs demonstrate significant effectiveness in the treatment of AR, IS, and CH. Effective management of CCH may require addressing both autonomic dysregulation and deeper neural pathways. However, additional high-quality research is essential to clarify its effects on NNCF, PTN, PCSO, RFP, and CTTH. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021252073, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=312429.

Sphenopalatine ganglion block for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension without demonstrable cerebrospinal fluid leak: A report of two cases.

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a condition characterized by orthostatic headache associated with nausea, vomiting, tinnitus, vertigo, hypoacusis, neck pain/stiffness, and photophobia. Usual treatment includes bed rest, hydration, caffeine, analgesics, epidural blood patch, steroids, fibrin glue (N-butyl-cyanoacrylate), and surgical repair. In this series, we report two cases, who presented to us with features of SIH and were managed successfully with sphenopalatine ganglion block. This is a novel modality of management of SIH and has not been reported before.

Ultrasound-guided sphenopalatine ganglion block for effective analgesia during awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Awake fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation (AFNI) is the preferred airway management strategy for patients with difficult airways. However, this procedure can cause significant physical and psychological distress. This case report explores the application of a sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block as an alternative analgesic modality to mitigate the discomfort associated with AFNI. CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old female with a history of right maxillary osteosarcoma underwent craniotomy for a suspected malignant brain lesion. The patient's medical history included prior surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, resulting in significant jaw impairment and limited neck mobility. Considering the anticipated airway challenges, AFNI was planned. A SPG block was performed under real-time ultrasound guidance, providing effective analgesia during nasotracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: The SPG block represents a promising analgesic approach in AFNI, offering potential benefits in alleviating pain involving the nasal and nasopharyngeal regions as well as improving patient cooperation.

Sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysm masquerading as a second primary maxillary carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Maxillary sinus carcinomas usually present as a locally advanced disease at the time of diagnosis and it is extremely unusual to have a second primary maxillary carcinoma on the contralateral side after many years of completion of treatment of the first malignancy. We present here a case report of a sphenopalatine artery (SPA) pseudoaneurysm mimicking the second primary maxillary carcinoma. METHODS: We reviewed the literature for SPA pseudoaneurysm. RESULTS/CASE REPORT: This report describes the case of a 90-year-old man with a background of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the right maxillary sinus, diagnosed and treated with surgery and radiotherapy 14 years ago, who presented with a history of multiple episodes of epistaxis. The radiological evaluation showed a heterogeneously enhancing mass with a central hemorrhagic component and surrounding bony erosions in the left maxillary sinus and the patient was planned for biopsy from the suspicious mass along with SPA ligation. However, on opening the maxillary antrum there was excessive bleeding and it was determined unsafe to proceed further. The patient was subsequently taken to interventional radiology for diagnostic angiography which revealed an SPA pseudoaneurysm that was subsequently embolized successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Sphenopalatine artery pseudoaneurysms should be considered as a differential for recurrent epistaxis in patients with a history of sinonasal malignancy. In such cases, endovascular embolization is a viable management option.

[Sphenopalatine ganglion block : a promising approach for headache and supratentorial intracranial surgery ?] / Le bloc du ganglion sphénopalatin : un traitement prometteur pour les céphalées et la chirurgie intracrânienne supratentorielle ?

We aimed to determine whether sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) had a place as a treatment for headache, as well as its place as an anterior component of scalp block for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Using the keywords «sphenopalatine ganglion¼, «sphenopalatine ganglion block¼, «pain¼, «surgery¼ and «craniotomy¼ in PubMed and Google Scholar, we identified 14 relevant articles. The methods used to perform the block and the treatment of control groups differed between studies. The main outcomes studied were reduction in pain scores and hemodynamic variations during supratentorial intracranial surgery. All articles concluded that SPGB was equal or superior compared with other procedures. Although there are still several points to be studied, considering the ease of application, the low number of complications and the results of the studies, the use of SPGB for the headache treatment and in neurosurgery as an anterior component of scalp block seems appropriate.

Cette revue de la littérature narrative vise à déterminer la place du bloc du ganglion sphénopalatin (BGSP) comme traitement des céphalées ainsi que sa place comme composante antérieure du bloc de scalp pour la chirurgie intracrânienne supratentorielle. Avec les mots-clés «ganglion sphénopalatin¼, «bloc du ganglion sphénopalatin¼, «douleur¼, «chirurgie¼ et «crâniotomie dans PubMed et Google Scholar, nous avons identifié 14 articles pertinents. Les méthodes de réalisation du bloc ainsi que les traitements des groupes témoins différaient selon les études. Les résultats principaux étudiés étaient la réduction des scores de douleur ainsi que les variations hémodynamiques au cours de la chirurgie intracrânienne supratentorielle. Tous les articles ont conclu à la non-infériorité ou la supériorité du BGSP en comparaison à d'autres procédures. Bien que plusieurs points restent à étudier, compte tenu de la facilité d'application, du peu de complications et des résultats, l'utilisation du BGSP pour le traitement des céphalées et en neurochirurgie comme composante antérieure du bloc de scalp semble appropriée.

A superficial dissection approach to the sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion to emphasize osteopathic clinical relevance.

The sphenopalatine (pterygopalatine) ganglion (SPG) is the most superficial ganglia to manipulate from the oral cavity. It has parasympathetic and sensory fibers directly affecting the paranasal sinuses as well as the palatine, nasal, pharyngeal, and lacrimal glands. The SPG can be manipulated intraorally by students and physicians utilizing osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to relieve congestion associated with sinusitis, allergies, headaches, and upper respiratory infections. Within osteopathic medical education programs, students have anecdotally had difficulty identifying this ganglion due to its deep anatomic location and lack of direct visualization. In this article, we discuss that cadaveric dissection with a superficial to deep approach to the SPG has the ability to allow medical students and physicians to better understand the three-dimensional location and osteopathic clinical relevance of this ganglion.

Is transoral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade more effective on postoperative pain than endoscopic sphenopalatine ganglion blockade?

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to examine and compare the effects of endoscopic SPGB and transoral SPGB on postoperative pain control and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing septoplasty. METHODS: Participants were randomly divided into three groups, no blockade (n:20), endoscopic SPGB (n:20), and transoral SPGB (n:20). Those who had no blockage were included in the control group. Demographic data of patients, such as age and sex, VAS (visual analogue scale) and postoperative pain scores (PPS) [determined at arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and after 2, 6, 12, and 24 h], general analgesic use (24 and 168 h after surgery) and postoperative Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) values were recorded and compare them. RESULTS: The PPS PACU of 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24-h values of the transoral group were lower than the endoscopic and control groups (p < 0.001).The values of 24 h and 168 h of analgesic use in the transoral group were lower than in the control and endoscopic groups (p < 0.001).The average recovery QoR-15 scores at 12 h and 24 h differed according to the groups (p < 0.001) and the highest values were in the transoral group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Transoral SPGB is more effective in postoperative pain control than endoscopic SPGB, it decreases the use of postoperative analgesics and improves postoperative recovery scores.

Postoperative effects of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in septorhinoplasty operations; double-blind randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objective We aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade (SPGB) on the main postoperative complications in septorhinoplasty operations. Methods In this randomized, controlled, prospective study, 80 cases planned for Septorhinoplasty operations under general anesthesia were included in the study. The cases were divided into two groups; SPGB was performed with 2 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine bilaterally 15 min before the end of the operation in the SPGB group (Group S, n = 40). In the control group (Group C, n = 40), 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was applied into both SPG areas. In the recovery unit after the operation; the pain and analgesic needs of the patients at 0, 2, 6 and 24 h were evaluated. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters (ASA, MBP, HR) (p> 0.05) All VAS values were statistically lower in Group S than in Group C (p< 0.05). In Group S, the need for analgesic medication was found in 5 cases between 0-2 h, whereas in Group C, this rate was found in 17 cases, and it was statistically significant (p< 0.05). Conclusion Bilateral SPGB application was determined to provide better analgesia in the early postoperative period compared to the control group, it was concluded that further studies are needed to say that there are significant effects on laryngospasm and nausea-vomiting. Level of evidence: 2, degree of recommendation B.

Postoperative effects of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in septorhinoplasty operations; double-blind randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion blockade (SPGB) on the main postoperative complications in septorhinoplasty operations. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, prospective study, 80 cases planned for Septorhinoplasty operations under general anesthesia were included in the study. The cases were divided into two groups; SPGB was performed with 2 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine bilaterally 15 min before the end of the operation in the SPGB group (Group S, n = 40). In the control group (Group C, n = 40), 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution was applied into both SPG areas. In the recovery unit after the operation; the pain and analgesic needs of the patients at 0, 2, 6 and 24 h were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters (ASA, MBP, HR) (p > 0.05) All VAS values were statistically lower in Group S than in Group C (p < 0.05). In Group S, the need for analgesic medication was found in 5 cases between 0-2 h, whereas in Group C, this rate was found in 17 cases, and it was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Bilateral SPGB application was determined to provide better analgesia in the early postoperative period compared to the control group, it was concluded that further studies are needed to say that there are significant effects on laryngospasm and nausea-vomiting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, degree of recommendation B.

Intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block by lignocaine spray for postdural puncture headache following spinal anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: In a randomized clinical study, we investigated the effectiveness of nasal lignocaine spray and swabs in treating postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after spinal anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Group S patients received two puffs of lignocaine 10% spray in both nostrils followed by cotton soaked in normal saline, and group B patients received two puffs of saline spray in both nostrils followed by a cotton swab soaked in lignocaine 2%. Patients were assessed before the procedure and 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 2 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after the procedure for pain relief with the help of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were also recorded. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean (95% confidence interval) whereas non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (IQR). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare the VAS score at different time points between test and control groups. The difference in means between the two groups was compared using the independent sample t -test. The paired t-test was used to compare the changes in clinical and laboratory variables. RESULTS: At each time point, the mean VAS score for pain was substantially different between the two groups. Moreover, until the second hour, the VAS score was significantly lower in group S than in group B. No significant intervention-related adverse effect was observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Without any noticeable side effects, lignocaine 10% spray is more successful in treating PDPH after spinal anesthesia, particularly in the first two hours.

Intranasal Lidocaine Administration via Mucosal Atomization Device: A Simple and Successful Treatment for Postdural Puncture Headache in Obstetric Patients.

(1) Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) remains a serious complication in obstetric patients. While the epidural blood patch represents the current gold standard in therapy, a growing number of alternative measures are thought to be beneficial for clinical management. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine administration to treat PDPH in obstetrics at our university hospital; (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients with PDPH has been performed focusing on the techniques of administration, dosing, treatment duration, impact on pain intensity as well as side effects of intranasal lidocaine; (3) Results: During the study period, 5610 obstetric patients received neuraxial anesthesia, of whom 43 (0.77%) developed PDPH. About one third of the patients with PDPH after spinal anesthesia (n = 8), epidural anesthesia (n = 5) or both (n = 2) were treated with intranasal lidocaine. Lidocaine was administered either via gauze compresses (GC, n = 4), a mucosal atomization device (MAD, n = 8) or with a second-line mucosal atomization device due to low gauze compress efficacy (n = 3). All patients treated with lidocaine refused the epidural blood patch. Nebulization of lidocaine resulted in a significant reduction in pain intensity after the first dose (p = 0.008). No relevant side effects developed except sporadic temporal pharyngeal numbness. The utilization of the mucosal atomization device averted the necessity for an epidural blood patch, whether employed as the primary or secondary approach; (4) Conclusions: Our data imply that the mucosal atomization device enhances the efficacy of intranasal lidocaine administration in obstetric patients suffering from PDPH.

Trans-nasal sphenopalatine ganglion block for post-dural puncture headache management: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trans-nasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) block over other treatments for Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH) management. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on databases for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing trans-nasal SPG blockade for the management of PDPH over other treatment modalities. All outcomes were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model. Analyses of all outcomes were performed as a subgroup based on the type of control interventions (conservative, intranasal lignocaine puffs, sham, and Greater Occipital Nerve [GON] block). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: After screening 1748 relevant articles, 9 RCTs comparing SPG block with other interventions (6 conservative treatments, 1 sham, 1 GON and 1 intranasal lidocaine puff) were included in this meta-analysis. SPG block demonstrated superiority over conservative treatment in pain reduction at 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h after interventions and treatment failures with "very low" to "moderate" quality of evidence. The SPG block failed to demonstrate superiority over conservative treatment in pain reduction beyond 6 h, need for rescue treatment, and adverse events. SPG block demonstrated superiority over intranasal lignocaine puff in pain reduction at 30 min, 1 h, 6 h, and 24 h after interventions. SPG block did not show superiority or equivalence in all efficacy and safety outcomes as compared to sham and GON block. Conclusion: Very Low to moderate quality evidence suggests the superiority of SPG block over conservative treatment and lignocaine puff for short-term pain relief from PDPH. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021291707.

Management of Recurrent and Refractory Posterior Epistaxis by Transnasal Endoscopic Sphenopalatine Artery Cauterization: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Transnasal endoscopic sphenopalatine artery occlusion procedures are becoming the standard of care for intractable posterior epistaxis. Improved endoscopic anatomical features of the lateral nasal wall and endoscopic skill with high-resolution cameras result in a higher success rate of endoscopic intervention. To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic cauterization of the sphenopalatine artery (ESPAC) in controlling intractable posterior nasal bleeding. This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with refractory posterior epistaxis from August 2016 to December 2019. The trial recruited patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a history of recurrent and refractory posterior epistaxis receiving endoscopic arterial cauterization due to conservative treatment failure. All of the cases involved bipolar cauterization. Recurrent nosebleeds must pause for at least three months for a procedure to be considered successful. In the first 30 days following surgery, complications are recorded. 415 patients with epistaxis received both inpatient and outpatient care. Transnasal ESPAC was necessary for 36 patients (11.5%). The most common comorbidity was hypertension accounting for 9 (23%) cases. Thus, 26 of 36 (72%) cases had a unilateral ESPAC, while 10 (28%) had a bilateral ESPAC. Twenty-two (61%) and ten (28%) patients had single and two branching patterns of the sphenopalatine artery, respectively. Septal correction and middle meatus antrostomy (44%) were the most performed additional procedures. During the three-month follow-up period, 35 patients in this study had epistaxis control; the success rate of ESPAC was 97.2%. There were no significant postoperative complications found. Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery cauterization is successful in controlling 97.2% of posterior epistaxis. It is safe and effective without any significant complications.

Anterior condylar arteriovenous fistula mainly fed by peripheral branches of the bilateral internal maxillary arteries: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The main feeding artery of an anterior condylar arteriovenous fistula (AC-AVF) is the ascending pharyngeal artery and rarely the internal maxillary artery. OBSERVATIONS: A 58-year-old male with a history of sinusitis since adolescence presented with a 5-year history of bilateral pulsatile tinnitus and a 2-month history of right ocular symptoms. Angiography showed that the peripheral branches of the bilateral internal maxillary arteries were the main feeding arteries of the AC-AVF and that they gathered in the clivus with a relatively large shunted pouch in the left jugular tubercle. Shunt flow drained to the right external jugular vein via the right superior ophthalmic vein. A sheath was placed in the right external jugular vein, and a small distal access catheter was guided to the right superior ophthalmic vein to allow the microcatheter to reach the shunted pouch. Selective angiography of the contralateral sphenopalatine artery allowed us to confirm the gathering site of the feeding arteries and the shunted pouch and archive the complete occlusion. LESSONS: Selective angiography of the contralateral sphenopalatine artery may be useful to confirm the gathering site of the peripheral branches of the bilateral internal maxillary arteries in an AC-AVF.

Endoscopic endonasal access to the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus.

BACKGROUND: The standard endoscopic endonasal approach gives access to the median sphenoid sinus, but not to its lateral part. We propose an endoscopic technique for lesions in the lateral sphenoid sinus. METHOD: Based on our experience with 28 patients, we have developed a less invasive approach to the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus, limiting the opening of the maxillary sinus while avoiding resection of the inferior turbinate and ethmoidal cells. The technique is described. CONCLUSION: The proposed endoscopic approach is reliable and safe to treat CSF leak or tumours located within the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus.

The Surgical Odyssey: Romania's Contributions to Pituitary Gland Procedures.

The pituitary gland, a puzzling medical subject up until the 20th century, had its early pathologies first documented in the 19th century by Pierre Marie and Hutchinson, where the gland's meaningful study was hindered by its hard-to-reach location. This paper revisits the pioneering work of Romanian doctors such as Gheorghe Marinescu, Nicolae Paulescu, and Grigore T. Popa in surgical techniques targeting the pituitary gland. Marinescu's 1892 experiment, albeit unsuccessful, laid the groundwork for future research in this area. Before Paulescu, surgical attempts could be classified into three types: oral, cranial, and sphenopalatine fossa approaches-all of which were notably dangerous and often resulted in fatal bleeding. Paulescu was the first to successfully and safely perform a complete in vivo hypophysectomy, opting for an innovative subtemporal method. He also conducted extensive research over four years to identify the gland's essential functions. Later, a 1938 study by Popa and Harris demonstrated a temporal approach to the hypothalamo-hypophysial region in a rabbit. These groundbreaking contributions significantly influenced the trajectory of pituitary gland surgery.

A Case Report of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Relieving Chronic Pain Post-Dental Bone Graft Surgery.

Chronic orofacial pain, by definition, is a pain that can anatomically extend anywhere between the area just under the orbitomeatal line, anterior to the pinnae, and above the neck. It occurs for 15 days or more per month, lasting four or more hours daily, for at least three months. Chronic orofacial pain, including persistent idiopathic facial pain syndrome, can significantly impact patients' quality of life and pose challenges for effective management. This case report describes a successful transnasal approach in treating a patient with severe oral pain following a bone graft surgery by blocking the sphenopalatine ganglion. The block provided significant pain relief and improved the patient's daily functioning. This minimally invasive treatment option offers an alternative for managing chronic orofacial pain after dental procedures such as bone graft surgery.