Spondylodiscitis: Understanding pathophysiology, surgical strategies, and postoperative management - A single-center study.

Background: Spondylodiscitis (SD) is an inflammatory condition affecting the intervertebral discs and adjacent structures, often leading to serious complications, including epidural abscesses. This study aimed to differentiate postoperative SD from spontaneous cases caused by osteoporotic defects and associated pathologies, evaluating the frequency of SD in spinal diseases at a single center. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study involving 25 patients was conducted, analyzing variations between postoperative revisions in SD patients and spontaneous SD due to concurrent pathology and osteoporotic defects. The effects of postoperative wound healing following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompressive hemilaminectomy with pedicle screws were also investigated. Ethical guidelines were strictly followed during the study, conducted from January 2023 to September 2023 at Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 68, Demikhova V.P. Results: Among the 25 patients with spontaneous SD, 15 females and 10 males were included, with only two undergoing surgical revision. Predominant purulent inflammatory foci were observed at specific spinal levels, and demographics revealed prevalent comorbidities such as arterial hypertension (80%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (60%). Postoperative complications included paravertebral abscesses and wound-related issues. Structural observations indicated vertebral destruction, joint gaps, and localized spinal canal narrowing, revealing complexities in SD cases. Conclusion: Surgical intervention remains crucial for addressing SD-related vertebral complications, while antimicrobial therapy tailored to specific pathogens is pivotal. Concurrent conditions necessitate comprehensive management, often involving cardiological interventions. Postoperatively, a combined approach of conservative therapy and calcium phosphate adjuncts is recommended, especially considering the observed low bone density, aiming to optimize patient recovery and spinal stability.

External Validation of Predictive Models for Failed Medical Management of Spinal Epidural Abscess.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited consensus regarding management of spinal epidural abscesses (SEAs), particularly in patients without neurologic deficits. Several models have been created to predict failure of medical management in patients with SEA. We evaluate the external validity of 5 predictive models in an independent cohort of patients with SEA. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients with SEA between 2010 and 2019 at our institution were identified, and variables relevant to each predictive model were collected. Published prediction models were used to assign probability of medical management failure to each patient. Predicted probabilities of medical failure and actual patient outcomes were used to create receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve used to quantify a model's discriminative ability. Calibration curves were plotted using predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. The Spiegelhalter z-test was used to determine adequate model calibration. RESULTS: One model (Kim et al) demonstrated good discriminative ability and adequate model calibration in our cohort (ROC = 0.831, P value = 0.83). Parameters included in the model were age >65, diabetes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, and neurologic impairment. Four additional models did not perform well for discrimination or calibration metrics (Patel et al, ROC = 0.580, P ≤ 0.0001; Shah et al, ROC = 0.653, P ≤ 0.0001; Baum et al, ROC = 0.498, P ≤ 0.0001; Page et al, ROC = 0.534, P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 published predictive model demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration in our cohort, suggesting limited generalizability of the evaluated models. Multi-institutional data may facilitate the development of widely applicable models to predict medical management failure in patients with SEA.

Influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing negative results in diagnosed patients with spinal infection.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) negative results in the diagnosed patients with spinal infection. mNGS test was applied in a cohort of 114 patients with suspected spinal infection, among which 56 patients had a final diagnosis of spinal infection. mNGS achieved a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI, 61.6% to 85.6%) and a specificity of 84.5% (95% CI, 72.6% to 92.7%), using histopathology and culture results as reference. Diagnosed patients with a negative culture result had lower white blood cell account, percentage of neutrophilic granulocyte, C-reactive protein (all P<0.05) and relatively higher rate of prior antimicrobial treatment history (P=0.059). However, diagnosed patients with a negative mNGS result did not have such difference with mNGS-positive patients, suggesting that mNGS was not strictly limited by the above indicators, which presented the advantages of this technique from another point of view.

Ongoing decision-making dilemma for treatment of de novo spinal infections: a comparison of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score with the Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score.

OBJECTIVE: De novo spinal infections are an increasing medical problem. The decision-making for surgical or nonsurgical treatment for de novo spinal infections is often a non-evidence-based process and commonly a case-by-case decision by single physicians. A scoring system based on the latest evidence might help improve the decision-making process compared with other purely radiology-based scoring systems or the judgment of a single senior physician. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with an infection of the spine who underwent nonsurgical or surgical treatment between 2019 and 2021 were identified. Clinical data for neurological status, pain, and existing comorbidities were gathered and transferred to an anonymous spreadsheet. Patients without an MR image and a CT scan of the affected spine region were excluded from the investigation. A multidisciplinary expert panel used the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), Spinal Instability Spondylodiscitis Score (SISS), and Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score (SITE Score), previously developed by the authors' group, on every clinical case. Each physician of the expert panel gave an individual treatment recommendation for surgical or nonsurgical treatment for each patient. Treatment recommendations formed the expert panel opinion, which was used to calculate predictive validities for each score. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients with spinal infections were identified. After the exclusion of doubled patients, patients without de novo infections, or those without CT and MRI scans, 123 patients remained for the investigation. Overall, 70.70% of patients were treated surgically and 29.30% were treated nonoperatively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the SITE Score, SINS, and SISS were 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.95, p < 0.01), 0.65 (95% CI 0.91-0.83, p < 0.01), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.91-0.89, p < 0.01). In comparison with the expert panel decision, the SITE Score reached a sensitivity of 96.97% and a specificity of 81.90% for all included patients. For potentially unstable and unstable lesions, the SISS and the SINS yielded sensitivities of 84.42% and 64.07%, respectively, and specificities of 31.16% and 56.52%, respectively. The SITE Score showed higher overall sensitivity with 97.53% and a higher specificity for patients with epidural abscesses (75.00%) compared with potentially unstable and unstable lesions for the SINS and the SISS. The SITE Score showed a significantly higher agreement for the definitive treatment decision regarding the expert panel decision, compared with the decision by a single physician for patients with spondylodiscitis, discitis, or spinal osteomyelitis. CONCLUSIONS: The SITE Score shows high sensitivity and specificity regarding the treatment recommendation by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The SITE Score shows higher predictive validity compared with radiology-based scoring systems or a single physician and demonstrates a high validity for patients with epidural abscesses.

Trends in infectious spondylitis from 2000 to 2020.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the trends in infectious spondylitis over the past two decades. METHODS: We included 157 cases, from 2000 to 2020, of infectious spondylitis. The cases were divided into two groups: 00 (cases during 2000-2009; 82 cases:) and 10 (cases during 2010-2020; 75 cases) groups. Patients' age, sex, causative organism, and localization were examined and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The proportions of women in the 00 and 10 groups were 30.5% and 38.7%, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.28). The average age was significantly higher in the 10 group (72.6 years) than in the 00 group (68.8 years; P < 0.01). A compromised host was the cause of infection in 52.4% and 36.0% of the patients in the 00 and 10 groups, respectively, showing a significant difference. The bacterial identification rates were 70.1% and 77.3% in the 00 and 10 groups, respectively (P < 0.01), and the genus Staphylococcus was the most common bacteria. The proportions of resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the 00 and 10 groups were 27.3% and 6.7%, respectively (P < 0.01). Conversely, infectious diseases caused by indigenous bacteria in the oral cavity and intestines were more common in the 10group (37.8%) than in the 00 group (13.0%), showing a significant difference (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Recently, infections caused by indigenous bacteria in the oral cavity and intestines have increased more than those caused by resistant bacteria over the past two decade.

Regional Spondylodiscitis Disparities: Impact on Pathogen Spectrum and Patients.

Background: Spondylodiscitis is an infectious disease affecting an intervertebral disc and the adjacent vertebral bodies and is often the complication of a distant focus of infection. This study aims to ascertain the regional and hospital-specific disparities in bacterial patterns and resistance profiles in spontaneous and iatrogenic spondylodiscitis and their implications for patient treatment. Methods: We enrolled patients from two German hospitals, specifically comparing a university hospital (UVH) with a peripheral non-university hospital (NUH). We documented patient demographics, laboratory results, and surgical interventions. Microbiological assessments, antibiotic regimens, treatment durations, and resistance profiles were recorded. Results: This study included 135 patients. Upon admission, 92.4% reported pain, with 16.2% also presenting neurological deficits. The primary microbial species identified in both the UVH and NUH cohorts were S. aureus (37.3% vs. 31.3%) and cog. neg. staphylococci (28.8% vs. 34.4%), respectively. Notably, a higher prevalence of resistant bacteria was noted in the UVH group (p < 0.001). Additionally, concomitant malignancies were significantly more prevalent in the UVH cohort. Conclusion: Significant regional variations exist in bacterial prevalence and resistance profiles. Consequently, treatment protocols need to consider these nuances and undergo regular critical evaluation. Moreover, patients with concurrent malignancies face an elevated risk of spondylodiscitis.

Post-Discectomy Infection: A Critical Review and Suggestion of a Management Algorithm.

Postoperative discitis (POD) accounts for 20% to 30% of all cases of pyogenic spondylodiscitis, while POD may be mis-or-under-diagnosed, due to the vague related symptomatology and the non-specific imaging findings. Most studies report infection rate of less than 1%, which increases with the addition of non-instrumented fusion to 2.4% to 6.2%. It remains controversial whether POD is caused by an aseptic or infectious process. Positive cultures are presented only in 42-73% of patients with Staphylococcus species being the most common invading organisms, while Staphylococcus aureus is isolated in almost 50% of cases. The onset of POD symptoms usually occurs at 2-4 weeks after an apparently uneventful operation. Back pain and muscle spasms are usually refractory to bed rest and analgesics. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive and specific imaging diagnostic technique. Antimicrobial therapy depends on the results of tissue cultures, and along with bracing represents the mainstay of management. Surgical intervention is necessary in patients failing conservative treatment. For the majority of cases, extensive surgical debridement, antibiotic therapy, and orthosis immobilization are effective in eliminating the infection. According to this, we recommend an Algorithmic approach for the management of POD. Postoperative infections after spinal surgery pose a certain clinical challenge, and in most cases can be treated conservatively. Nevertheless, disability may be persistent, and surgery could be necessary. The purpose of this concise review is to describe the manifestation of post-discectomy infection, its pathogenesis and particularly a rational approach for its management.

Value of Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score, Pola Classification, and Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score from Decision to Surgery in Patients with Spondylodiscitis: A Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the value of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) score, Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSDS), and Pola classification to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spondylodiscitis is a rare disease, and the prediction of its outcome is crucial in the decision-making process. METHODS: All case records were assessed to extract information on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores before and after surgery. The SITE score, Pola classification, and BSDS were recorded. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were applied to estimate the predictive ability of the scoring systems. Patients' satisfaction with surgery outcomes was evaluated using the VAS, ASIA, JOABPEQ, and Likert scale for quality-of-life evaluation. RESULTS: In all 148 patients, case records were reviewed. The mean±standard deviation age of the patients was 54.6±14.7 years. Of these, 112 patients underwent surgery. The AUC scores were 0.86, 0.81, and 0.73 for the SITE score, BSDS, and Pola classification, respectively. In the comparison of the AUC of ROC curves, SITE score vs. BSDS showed a significantly greater AUC, 0.13 (Z =2.1, p =0.037); SITE score vs. Pola classification, 0.05 (Z =0.82, p =0.412); and Pola classification vs. BSDS, 0.08 (Z =1.22, p =0.219). The optimal cutoff score was 8.5 (sensitivity, 80.6%; specificity, 81.2%) for the SITE score and 9.5 (sensitivity, 52.8%; specificity, 83.0%) for the BSDS in the decision to surgery. VAS back pain and JOABPEQ subscales showed a significant difference when compared with preoperative scores. According to ASIA grading, none of the patients experienced neurological deterioration. Overall, patients' satisfaction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the SITE score is a useful measure and helps clinicians make clinically sound decisions in patients with spondylodiscitis.

Thoracic spine infection caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens: A case report and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: The clinical incidence of spinal infection is gradually increasing, and its onset is insidious, easily leading to missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, which may lead to serious complications such as nervous system dysfunction, spinal instability and/or deformity, and cause a huge burden on society and families. Early identification of the causative agent and precision medicine will greatly reduce the suffering of patients. At present, the main pathogenic bacteria that cause spinal infection are Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus, Pneumococcus, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella. There are no reports of spinal infection caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens. CASE SUMMARY: We report a 32-year-old female patient with spinal infection. She presented with flank pain, initially thought to be bone metastases or bone tuberculosis, and had a family background of tumors. Her clinical features and changes in imaging and laboratory tests led to the suspicion of thoracic spine infection. Histopathology of the lesion showed inflammation, tissue culture of the lesion was negative several times, and the possible pathogen - Pseudomonas fluorescens was found after gene sequencing of the lesion. The patient recovered completely after a full course of antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: This report increases the range of pathogens involved in spinal infections, highlights the unique advantages of gene sequencing technology in difficult-to-diagnose diseases, and validates conservative treatment with a full course of antibiotics for spinal infections without complications.

Identification of pathogen composition in a Chinese population with iatrogenic and native vertebral osteomyelitis by using mNGS.

BACKGROUND: Early antimicrobial therapy is crucial regarding the prognosis of vertebral osteomyelitis, but early pathogen diagnosis remains challenging. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to differentiate the types of pathogens in iatrogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (IVO) and native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) to guide early antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A total of 145 patients, who had confirmed spinal infection and underwent metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) testing, were included, with 114 in the NVO group and 31 in the IVO group. Using mNGS, we detected and classified 53 pathogens in the 31 patients in the IVO group and 169 pathogens in the 114 patients in the NVO group. To further distinguish IVO from NVO, we employed machine learning algorithms to select serum biomarkers and developed a nomogram model. RESULTS: The results revealed that the proportion of the Actinobacteria phylum in the NVO group was approximately 28.40%, which was significantly higher than the 15.09% in the IVO group. Conversely, the proportion of the Firmicutes phylum (39.62%) in the IVO group was markedly increased compared to the 21.30% in the NVO group. Further genus-level classification demonstrated that Staphylococcus was the most common pathogen in the IVO group, whereas Mycobacterium was predominant in the NVO group. Through LASSO regression and random forest algorithms, we identified 5 serum biomarkers including percentage of basophils (BASO%), percentage of monocytes (Mono%), platelet volume (PCT), globulin (G), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) for distinguishing IVO from NVO. Based on these biomarkers, we established a nomogram model capable of accurately discriminating between the two conditions. CONCLUSION: The results of this study hold promise in providing valuable guidance to clinical practitioners for the differential diagnosis and early antimicrobial treatment of vertebral osteomyelitis.

Single- and Multilevel Corpectomy and Vertebral body replacement for treatment of spinal infections. A retrospective single-center study of 100 cases.

Background: The optimal operative approach for treating spinal infections remains a subject of debate. Corpectomy and Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) have emerged as common modalities, yet data on their feasibility and complication profiles are limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study examined 100 consecutive cases (2015-2022) that underwent VBR for spinal infection treatment. A comparison between Single-level-VBR and Multi-level-VBR was performed, evaluating patient profiles, revision rates, and outcomes. Results: Among 360 cases treated for spinal infections, 100 underwent VBR, located in all spinal regions. Average clinical and radiologic follow-up spanned 1.5 years. Single-level-VBR was performed in 60 cases, Two-level-VBR in 37, Three-level-VBR in 2, and Four-level-VBR in one case.Mean overall sagittal correction reached 10° (range 0-54°), varying by region. Revision surgery was required in 31 cases. Aseptic mechanical complications (8% pedicle screw loosening, 3% cage subsidence, 6% aseptic adjacent disc disease) were prominent reasons for revision. Longer posterior constructs (>4 levels) had significantly higher revision rates (p < 0.01). General complications (wound healing, hematoma) followed, along with infection relapse and adjacent disc infection (9%) and neurologic impairment (1%).Multilevel-VBR (≥2 levels) displayed no elevated cage subsidence rate compared to Single-level-VBR. Three deaths occurred (43-86 days post-op), all in the Multi-level-VBR group. Conclusion: This study, reporting the largest number of VBR cases for spinal infection treatment, affirmed VBR's effectiveness in sagittal imbalance correction. The overall survival was high, while reinfection rates matched other surgical studies. Anterior procedures have minimal implant related risks, but extended dorsal instrumentation elevates revision surgery likelihood.

Unilateral or Bilateral Percutaneous Endoscopic Debridement and Drainage for Thoracolumbar Infections: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (UPEDD) and bilateral PEDD (BPEDD) are commonly implemented, and have consistently yielded favorable clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of literature contrasting the advantages and disadvantages between these 2 procedures. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this research was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical effects of UPEDD and BPEDD. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of studies reporting outcomes following UPEDD and/or BPEDD procedures was performed. The extracted data were used for meta-analysis. Pooled event rates for positive bacteria culture, pain control satisfaction, reoperation, and complications were estimated. The pooled operation time and blood loss were also calculated. RESULTS: Among 764 retrieved articles, 28 studies with 661 patients met the inclusion criteria and were used for our meta-analysis. A total of 21 studies (462 patients) investigated UPEDD outcomes and 7 studies (199 patients) investigated BPEDD outcomes. For the UPEDD group, the pooled event rates for positive bacteria culture, pain control satisfaction, reoperation, and complications were 72%, 91%, 9% and 4%, respectively; the pooled operation time and blood loss were 89.90 minutes and 59.77 mL. For the BPEDD group, these were 79%, 92%, 4%, 8%, 93.23 minutes and 64.93 mL, respectively. LIMITATIONS: First, all included studies were retrospective series, limiting our study design to a single-arm meta-analysis. Second, there was a limited amount of studies that were determined to be fitting, particularly on BPEDD; the sample size was also small. Third, the clinical effects of UPEDD and BPEDD needed to be compared in greater detail, such as the time it took for inflammatory markers to return to normal, the incidence of local kyphosis, and whether the duration of antibiotic use could be shortened after adequate debridement with BPEDD. Lastly, further studies are necessary to compare the clinical outcome of PEDD and percutaneous endoscopic interbody debridement and fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Both UPEDD and BPEDD can provide a relatively reliable causative-pathogen identification and satisfactory clinical outcome. The 2 techniques are not significantly different in terms of positive bacteria culture rate, pain control satisfaction rate, complication rate, and reoperation rate.

Effectiveness of vancomycin powder for preventing postoperative spinal infection.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Vancomycin Power (VP) and the occurrence of resistant organisms after four-year of routine VP use. METHODS: The study included 1063 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between January 2010 and February 2020. Intrawound VP was applied to all instrumented fusions starting in January 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those who did not apply VP (non-VP) (n = 605) between 2010 and 2015, and those who did apply VP (VP) (n = 458) between 2016 and 2020. The baseline characteristics, clinical symptoms, infection rate, and causative organisms were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The rate of PSI was not significantly different between the non-VP group (1.32 %, n = 8) and the VP group (1.09 %, n = 5). Although adjusted by diabetes mellitus, VP still did not show statistical significance (OR = 0.757 (0.245-2.345), p = 0.630). There were no critical complications that were supposed to relation with vancomycin powder. In the 13 cases of PSI, seven pathogens were isolated, with a gram-negative organism identified in the non-VP group. However, the type of organism was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intrawound VP may not affect the PSI and occurrence of resistant organism and may not cause critical complications. Therefore, clinicians may decide whether to use VP for preventing PSI not worrying about its safety.

Application of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Suspected Spinal Infectious Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing and treating suspected spinal infectious diseases. METHODS: Between October 2022 to December 2023, a retrospective analysis was performed on patient records within the Department of Spinal Surgery at Guilin People's Hospital. The analysis included comprehensive data on patients with presumed spinal infectious diseases, incorporating results from mNGS tests conducted externally, conventional pathogen detection results, laboratory examination results, and imaging findings. The study aimed to assess the applicability of mNGS in the context of suspected spinal infectious lesions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. Pathogenic microorganisms were identified in 23 cases. The included cases encompassed 1 case of tuberculous spondylitis, 1 case of fungal infection, 3 cases of Brucella spondylitis, 3 cases of viral infection, 9 cases of bacterial infection, and 6 cases of mixed infections. Pathogenic microorganisms remained elusive in 4 cases. The application of the mNGS method demonstrated a significantly elevated positive detection rate compared to conventional methods (85.19% vs. 48.15%, P < 0.05). Moreover, the mNGS method detected a greater variety of pathogen species than traditional methods (Z = 10.69, P < 0.05). Additionally, the mNGS method exhibited a shorter detection time. CONCLUSIONS: mNGS demonstrated significantly higher detection rates for bacterial, fungal, viral, and mixed infections in cases of suspected spinal infectious diseases. The clinical implementation of mNGS could further enhance the efficiency of diagnosing and treating suspected spinal infectious diseases.

Technetium-99m-ubiquicidin 29-41 SPECT-CT to detect postsurgical spinal infection: A case report.

Background: Postsurgical spinal infections are a severe complication and a challenge to the neurosurgeon due to their complex management. Revision surgeries and the removal of hardware are usually necessary. Recently, advances in nuclear medicine have made it possible to employ radiotracers to identify infections. The radiolabeled antimicrobial peptide technetium-99m-ubiquicidin (99mTc-UBI) (29-41) has been demonstrated to detect bacterial infections. UBI 29-41 is a peptide sequence with selective binding to the anionic cell membrane of bacteria, which has recently been used to differentiate between infection and inflammation. Here, we describe the clinical utility of 99mTc-UBI 29-41 single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) in a patient suspected of a postoperative infection. Case description: A 54-year-old male who presented with conus medullaris syndrome secondary to T12 spondylodiscitis and multiple abscess collections was initially managed with debridement, corpectomy, and minimally invasive lateral instrumentation. The patient developed postsurgical empyema near the surgical site. The image study avoided the need for a second surgery and hardware removal. Conclusion: The use of 99mTc-UBI 29-41 SPECT-CT served as a tool to avoid a second invasive procedure; instead, conservative management with antibiotics was performed with an effective outcome after two weeks. This radiotracer has utility in cases in which infection is suspected, but the location is not entirely clear, and information is needed to guide the therapeutic approach.

Spinal infection caused by Aspergillus flavus in a diabetic: a case report and literature review.

Spinal infections, notably those induced by Aspergillus flavus (A. flavus), represent a complex and uncommon clinical challenge. In individuals with diabetes mellitus, the risk is exacerbated due to a compromised immune response and a heightened vulnerability to non-standard pathogens. This case report chronicles the intricate diagnostic and treatment journey of a 59-year-old diabetic patient grappling with a spinal infection attributed to A. flavus. The diagnosis was delayed due to non-specific symptoms and unclear radiological signs. The administration of voriconazole, a targeted antifungal treatment, resulted in a significant clinical and radiological improvement, underscoring its effectiveness in treating such unusual fungal spinal infections; meanwhile, we found that terbinafine hydrochloride also has a similar effect in treating fungal spinal infections. This case underscores the importance of considering fungal causes in spinal infections among diabetic patients and highlights prompt diagnosis and individualized targeted antifungal therapy.

From the Oral Cavity to the Spine: Prevalence of Oral Cavity Infections in Patients with Pyogenic Spinal Infection.

Background incidence of pyogenic spinal infections has increased in recent years. In addition to treating the spinal infection, optimal care also includes identifying the source of the pyogenic spinal infection and the presence of other infections. The aim of this study is to elucidate the prevalence of oral cavity infection (OCI) within this patient cohort. Methods As part of a prospective study conducted from 2016 to 2021, the number of patients with dental infections was investigated by means of an orthopantomogram (OPG) and subsequent dental examination. Results The presence of an oral infection was investigated in 55 (47%) of 118 patients by an OPG, 29 (53%) of whom had a corresponding abnormality of the oral cavity. In addition to the spinal infection, patients with an oral cavity infection revealed an increased incidence of endocarditis, sepsis and brain abscess. A spinal epidural abscess, a multilevel affection of the infection, and an elevated CRP value were also found in patients with a co-existing oral cavity infection. Back pain assessed at admission and 3 months after surgery was also more pronounced in patients with an oral cavity infection. Neurological deficits were often present in patients with spinal and oral cavity infection. Conclusions The presence of an oral cavity infection has proven to be one of the important factors in the detection of the source of the pyogenic spinal infection. In addition, a pronounced spinal affection and frequent co-infections were seen in patients with an oral cavity infection.

Spinal infection after vertebral augmentation: a covert complication with serious havoc.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral augmentation, including percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or kyphoplasty (PKP), is the current least invasive surgical option and has been widely used to treat the painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). However, the postoperative infections could be life-threatening, even though they rarely occur. Our studies aim to clarify the causation and outcomes of spinal infections following augmentation and meanwhile to identify the risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with OVCF who underwent PVP or PKP, and were subsequently admitted to our institution with postoperative spinal infection between January 2010 and December 2022. A total of 33 patients were finally included. RESULTS: The rate of spinal infection after augmentation in our single institute was 0.05% (2/3893). In addition to these 2 patients, the remaining 31 were referred from other hospitals. All 33 patients exhibited elevated inflammatory parameters, 14 patients presented with fever, and 9 patients experienced neurological deficits. Additionally, 29 patients had comorbidity and risk factors. Pathogens were identified in 26 patients, while only 7 patients were examined as culture negative. 27 patients underwent revision surgery and 6 patients only received conservative therapy. Anterior surgery was performed in 2 patients, while posterior surgery was performed in 20 patients. A combined anterior-posterior surgery was performed in 5 patients. At the final follow-up, 18 patients had unrestricted mobility, 10 patients required assistance from crutches or a walker for ambulation, 4 patients needed a wheelchair, and 1 patients died after revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal infection after vertebral augmentation is rare, but it cannot be ignored. Surgeons should make every effort to detect the potential preoperative spondylitis or discitis. Once postoperative spinal infection is confirmed, a prompt intravenous antibiotic therapy is warranted. If medication therapy fails, revision surgery involving debridement and spinal reconstruction should be considered.

In-Hospital Mortality from Spondylodiscitis: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

(1) Background: There is a marked proportion of spondylodiscitis patients who die during the early stage of the disease despite the applied therapy. This study investigates this early mortality and explores the associated risk factors. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of spondylodiscitis patients treated at our Level I spine center between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022. (3) Results: Among 430 patients, 32 (7.4%) died during their hospital stay, with a median time of 28.5 days (range: 2.0-84.0 days). Six of these patients (18.75%) did not undergo surgery due to dire clinical conditions or death prior to scheduled surgery. Identified causes of in-hospital death included multiorgan failure (n = 15), acute bone marrow failure (2), cardiac failure (4), liver failure (2), acute respiratory failure (2), acute renal failure (1), and concomitant oncological disease (1). In a simple logistic regression analysis, advanced age (p = 0.0006), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0002), previous steroid medication (p = 0.0279), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001), and GFR level at admission (p = 0.0008) were significant risk factors for in-hospital death. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, advanced age (p = 0.0038), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.0002), and previous steroid medication (p = 0.0281) remained significant. (4) Conclusions: Despite immediate treatment, a subset of spondylodiscitis patients experience early mortality. Particular attention should be given to elderly patients and those with diabetes or a history of steroid medication, as they face an elevated risk of a rapidly progressing and fatal disease.

Diagnostics, Management, and Outcomes in Patients with Pyogenic Spinal Intra- or Epidural Abscess.

BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence on the diagnostics, clinical course, treatment, and outcomes of patients with extremely rare spinal intradural abscess (SIA) and spinal epidural abscess (SEA), we retrospectively analyzed and compared a cohort of patients to determine the phenotyping of both entities. METHODS: Over a period of 20 years, we retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of 78 patients with SIA and SEA. RESULTS: The patients with SIA showed worse motor scores (MS scores) on admission (SIA: 20 ± 26 vs. SEA: 75 ± 34, p < 0.001), more often with an ataxic gait (SIA: 100% vs. SEA: 31.8%, p < 0.001), and more frequent bladder or bowel dysfunction (SIA: 91.7% vs. SEA: 27.3%, p < 0.001) compared to the SEA patients. Intraoperative specimens showed a higher diagnostic sensitivity in the SEA patients than the SIA patients (SIA: 66.7% vs. SEA: 95.2%, p = 0.024), but various pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 69.4%) and Streptococci and Enterococci (SIA 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.1%, p = 0.038) were detected in both entities. The patients with SIA developed sepsis more often (SIA: 75.0% vs. SEA: 18.2%, p < 0.001), septic embolism (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 8.3%, p = 0.043), signs of meningism (SIA: 100% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.001), ventriculitis or cerebral abscesses (SIA: 41.7% vs. SEA: 3.0%, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002). The mean MS score improved in both patient groups after surgery (SIA: 20 to 35 vs. SEA: 75 to 90); however, the SIA patients showed a poorer MS score at discharge (SIA: 35 ± 44 vs. SEA: 90 ± 20, p < 0.001). C-reactive protein (CrP) (SIA: 159 to 49 vs. SEA: 189 to 27) and leukocyte count (SIA: 15 to 9 vs. SEA: 14 to 7) were reduced at discharge. The SIA patients had higher rates of disease-related mortality (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA: 1.5%, p = 0.002), had more pleural empyema (SIA: 58.3% vs. SEA: 13.6%, p = 0.002), required more than one surgery (SIA: 33.3% vs. SEA 13.6%, p = 0.009), were treated longer with intravenous antibiotics (7 ± 4 w vs. 3 ± 2 w, p < 0.001) and antibiotics overall (12 ± 10 w vs. 7 ± 3 w, p = 0.022), and spent more time in the hospital (SIA: 58 ± 36 vs. SEA: 26 ± 20, p < 0.001) and in the intensive care unit (SIA: 14 ± 18 vs. SEA: 4 ± 8, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted distinct clinical phenotypes and outcomes between both entities, with SIA patients displaying a markedly less favorable disease course in terms of complications and outcomes.