The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ambulatory Lumbar Spine Decompression Surgery.

Background Only a few studies have examined the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on spine ambulatory surgeries and changes in trends. Therefore, we investigated trends during the pre-pandemic period and three pandemic stages in patients undergoing lumbar decompression procedures in the ambulatory surgery (AMS) setting. Methodology A total of 2,670 adult patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar decompression surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into the following four groups: 1: pre-pandemic (before the pandemic from January 1, 2019, to March 16, 2020); 2: restricted period (when elective surgery was canceled from March 17, 2020, to June 30, 2020); 3: post-restricted 2020 (July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, before vaccination); and 4: post-restricted 2021 (January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 after vaccination). Simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses as well as retrospective interrupted time series (ITS) analysis were conducted comparing AMS patients in the four periods. Results Patients from the restricted pandemic period were younger and healthier, which led to a shorter length of stay (LOS). The ITS analysis demonstrated a significant drop in mean LOS at the beginning of the restricted period and recovered to the pre-pandemic levels in one year. Multivariable logistic regression analyses indicated that the pandemic was an independent factor influencing the LOS in post-restricted phases. Conclusions As the post-restricted 2020 period itself might be independently influenced by the pandemic, these results should be taken into account when interpreting the LOS of the patients undergoing ambulatory spine surgery in post-restricted phases.

How will early onset scoliosis surgery affect my child's future as a young adult? A follow-up study using patient-reported outcome measures.

PURPOSE: Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), this study was undertaken to determine how well patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) fare in adulthood. METHODS: Among eight healthcare centers, 272 patients (≥ 18 years) surgically managed for EOS (≥ 5 years) completed the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-10 (FACIT-Dyspnea-10), and Short Form (SF)-12. Functional and demographic data were collected. RESULTS: The response rate was 40% (108/272). EOS etiologies were congenital (45%), neuromuscular (20%), idiopathic (20%) syndromic (11%), and unknown (4%). All patients scored within normal limits on the FACIT-Dyspnea-10 pulmonary (no breathing aids, 78%; no oxygen, 92%). SF-12 physical health scores and most SRS-22r domains were significantly decreased (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) compared with normative values. SF-12 and SRS-22r mental health scores (MHS) were lower than normative values (p < 0.05 and p < 0.02, respectively). Physical health PROMs varied between etiologies. Treatment varied by etiology. Patients with congenital EOS were half as likely to undergo definitive fusion. There was no difference between EOS etiologies in SF-12 MHS, with t scores being slightly lower than normative peers. CONCLUSION: Good long-term physical and social function and patient-reported quality of life were noted in surgically managed patients. Patients with idiopathic EOS physically outperformed those with other etiologies in objective and PROM categories but had similar MHS PROMs. Compared to normative values, EOS patients demonstrated decreased long-term physical capacity, slightly lower MHS, and preserved cardiopulmonary function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Series.

Prediction of additional hospital days in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with machine learning methods.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), uses algorithms to analyze data and predict outcomes without extensive human intervention. In healthcare, ML is gaining attention for enhancing patient outcomes. This study focuses on predicting additional hospital days (AHD) for patients with cervical spondylosis (CS), a condition affecting the cervical spine. The research aims to develop an ML-based nomogram model analyzing clinical and demographic factors to estimate hospital length of stay (LOS). Accurate AHD predictions enable efficient resource allocation, improved patient care, and potential cost reduction in healthcare. METHODS: The study selected CS patients undergoing cervical spine surgery and investigated their medical data. A total of 945 patients were recruited, with 570 males and 375 females. The mean number of LOS calculated for the total sample was 8.64 ± 3.7 days. A LOS equal to or <8.64 days was categorized as the AHD-negative group (n = 539), and a LOS > 8.64 days comprised the AHD-positive group (n = 406). The collected data was randomly divided into training and validation cohorts using a 7:3 ratio. The parameters included their general conditions, chronic diseases, preoperative clinical scores, and preoperative radiographic data including ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (OALL), ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), cervical instability and magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted imaging high signal (MRI T2WIHS), operative indicators and complications. ML-based models like Lasso regression, random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) were developed for predicting AHD-related risk factors. The intersections of the variables screened by the aforementioned algorithms were utilized to construct a nomogram model for predicting AHD in patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and C-index were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to test the calibration performance and clinical utility. RESULTS: For these participants, 25 statistically significant parameters were identified as risk factors for AHD. Among these, nine factors were obtained as the intersection factors of these three ML algorithms and were used to develop a nomogram model. These factors were gender, age, body mass index (BMI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scores, magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted imaging high signal (MRI T2WIHS), operated segment, intraoperative bleeding volume, the volume of drainage, and diabetes. After model validation, the AUC was 0.753 in the training cohort and 0.777 in the validation cohort. The calibration curve exhibited a satisfactory agreement between the nomogram predictions and actual probabilities. The C-index was 0.788 (95% confidence interval: 0.73214-0.84386). On the decision curve analysis (DCA), the threshold probability of the nomogram ranged from 1 to 99% (training cohort) and 1 to 75% (validation cohort). CONCLUSION: We successfully developed an ML model for predicting AHD in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, showcasing its potential to support clinicians in AHD identification and enhance perioperative treatment strategies.

Pedicle screw insertion into infected vertebrae reduces operative time and range of fixation in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive posterior fixation surgery for pyogenic spondylitis is known to reduce invasiveness and complication rates; however, the outcomes of concomitant insertion of pedicle screws (PS) into the infected vertebrae via the posterior approach are undetermined. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PS insertion into infected vertebrae in minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 70 patients undergoing minimally invasive posterior fixation for thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis across nine institutions. Patients were categorized into insertion and skip groups based on PS insertion into infected vertebrae, and surgical data and postoperative outcomes, particularly unplanned reoperations due to complications, were compared. RESULTS: The mean age of the 70 patients was 72.8 years. The insertion group (n = 36) had shorter operative times (146 versus 195 min, p = 0.032) and a reduced range of fixation (5.4 versus 6.9 vertebrae, p = 0.0009) compared to the skip group (n = 34). Unplanned reoperations occurred in 24% (n = 17) due to surgical site infections (SSI) or implant failure; the incidence was comparable between the groups. Poor infection control necessitating additional anterior surgery was reported in four patients in the skip group. CONCLUSIONS: PS insertion into infected vertebrae during minimally invasive posterior fixation reduces the operative time and range of fixation without increasing the occurrence of unplanned reoperations due to SSI or implant failure. Judicious PS insertion in patients with minimal bone destruction in thoracolumbar pyogenic spondylitis can minimize surgical invasiveness.

Factors leading to open revision surgery after trans-sacral canal plasty for lumbar spine disease.

Trans-sacral canal plasty (TSCP) is a minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery under local anaesthesia. TSCP is expected to be effective regardless of whether the patient has had previous surgery. However, there are cases in which open revision surgery is required after TSCP. This study aimed to identify risk factors for open revision surgery after TSCP in order to determine surgical indications and limitations. A retrospective case-control study was conducted in patients who underwent TSCP for lumbar spine disease. Data of 112 patients were analysed. During an observation period of 7-23 months, 34 patients (30.4%) required open revision surgery and 78 (69.6%) did not. The following patient background characteristics were investigated: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, history of spine surgery and the institution where the surgery was performed. Comorbidities were scored using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Preoperative imaging parameters were investigated, including the lesion level (L4/5, L5/S1, other), presence of intervertebral instability, dural sac area, presence of bony stenosis and presence of epidural lipoma. Multivariate analysis revealed that intervertebral instability (odds ratio 2.56, confidence interval 1.00-6.51, p = 0.046) and a narrow dural sac area (odds ratio 0.98, confidence interval 0.97-0.99, p = 0.002) were significant risk factors for open revision surgery after TSCP.

Mechanical Vertebral Body Augmentation Versus Conventional Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has traditionally consisted of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedures. Mechanical percutaneous vertebral body augmentation (MPVA) systems have recently been introduced as alternatives to traditional methods. However, the effectiveness of MPVA systems vs conventional augmentation techniques for OVCFs remains unclear. This serves as the premise for this study. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies of interest included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared patient outcomes following kyphoplasty to patients treated with MPVA systems. Clinical and radiological findings were collated and compared for significance between cohorts. RESULTS: 6 RCTs were identified with 1024 patients total. The mean age of all patients was 73.5 years. 17% of the cohort were male, 83% were female. 515 patients underwent kyphoplasty and 509 underwent mechanical vertebral body augmentation using MPVA systems. MPVAs showed similar efficacy for restoration of vertebral body height (P = .18), total complications (P = .36), cement extravasation (P = .58) and device-related complications (P = .06). MPVAs also showed reduced rates of all new fractures (16.4% vs 22.2%; P = .17) and adjacent fractures (14.7% vs 18.9%; P = .23), with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 6-month (P = .13). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis highlight no significant improvement in clinical or radiological outcomes for MPVA systems when compared to balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral body augmentation. Further research is needed to establish a true benefit over traditional operative methods.

Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine surgery.

Objective: To report our updated experience in the management of esophageal perforation resulting from anterior cervical spine surgery, and to compare two wound management approaches. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients managed for esophageal perforations resulting from anterior cervical spine surgery (2007-2020). We examine outcomes based on 2 wound management approaches: closed (closed incision over a drain) versus open (left open to heal by secondary intention). We collected data on demographics, operative management, resolution (resumption of oral intake), time to resolution, number of procedures needed for resolution, microbiology, length of stay, and neck morbidity. Results: A total of 13 patients were included (10 men). Median age was 52 years (range, 24-74 years). All patients underwent surgical drainage, repair, or attempted repair of perforation, hardware removal, and establishment of enteral access. Wounds were managed closed versus open (6 closed, 7 open). There were 2 early postoperative deaths due to acute respiratory distress syndrome and aspiration (open group), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up (closed group). Among the remaining 10 patients: resolution rate was 80% versus 100%, resolution in 30 days was 20% versus 100%, median number of procedures needed for resolution was 3 versus 1, and median hospital stay was 23 versus 14 days, for the closed and open groups, respectively. Conclusions: Esophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery should be managed in a multidisciplinary fashion with surgical neck drainage, primary repair when feasible, hardware removal, and establishment of enteral access. We advocate open neck wound management to decrease the time-to-resolution, number of procedures, and length of stay.

Endoscopic treatment of thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that has been shown to relieve intradiscal pressure, irrigation of inflammatory factors, and visual debridement, which are crucial for the successful treatment of spondylodiscitis. This study proposes a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment of thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for studies involving thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis treated by endoscopic disc drainage with or without additional posterior fixation over the last twenty years. Studies that met the inclusion criteria, which included outcomes related to the percentage of cured infections, patient satisfaction, regression of inflammatory markers, and/or the percentage of adverse event rates, were included in the analysis. For each study, the percentage of patients who showed improvement or experienced an adverse event was abstracted and pooled in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Based on the search strategy and inclusion criteria, our systematic review and meta-analysis included 20 studies with 546 participants. The success rate was 89.4% (95% CI 83.1%-94.5%). The rate of major adverse events was 0.3%, while that of postoperative transient paresthesia 2.6% (95% CI 0.8%-5.1%). The recurrence rate was 1.7% (95% CI 0.3%-4.0%), and revision surgery was 8.5% (95% CI 3.8%-14.6%). The causative pathogen diagnosis rate was 73.9% (95% CI 67.7%-79.8%), while progression of deformity was 3.7% (95% CI 0.2%-9.8%), and spontaneous fusion was 40.1% (95% CI 11.0%-73.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic discectomy for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis has been shown to be a safe technique with satisfactory clinical outcomes and a high causative pathogen identification rate.

Health Care Fraud and Abuse: Lessons From One of the Largest Scandals of the 21st Century in the Field of Spine Surgery.

Up to hundreds of billions of dollars are annually lost to fraud and abuse in the US health care, making it a significant burden on the system. This study investigates a specific instance of health care fraud in spine surgery, in which a medical device company ended up paying $75 million to settle violations of the False Claims Act. We review the surgical background regarding the kyphoplasty procedure, as well as its billing and reimbursement details. We also explore the official legal complaint brought by the US Department of Justice to tell the story of how one of the most significant medical innovations in spine surgery in the 21st century turned into a widespread fraudulent marketing scheme. In the sequence, we provide a detailed root cause analysis of this scandal and propose some proactive measures that can be taken to avoid such type of unfortunate events. Ultimately, this historical health care scandal constitutes a valuable lesson to surgeons, health care administrators, medical device companies, and policymakers on how misaligned incentives and subsequent unscrupulous practices can transform a medical innovation into an unfortunate tale of fraud and deceit.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING IN SPINAL SURGERY: UPDATE AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW / IMPRESSÃO 3D EM CIRURGIA DA COLUNA VERTEBRAL: ATUALIZAÇÃO E REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA

Introduction: Three-dimensional printing is considered the "third industrial revolution". It was developed as a promising innovation for many areas, including medicine. There are many ways to use 3D printing in spinal surgery: patient and healthcare professional education, preoperative applications such as surgical planning and intraoperative applications. Objective: To carry out an update and systematic review on the use of 3DP in spinal surgery. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed database in January 2024, using the terms "spine surgery" and "3D printing". Articles published between 2014 and 2024 and only clinical trials were selected. Articles that were not in English or Spanish were excluded. This review followed the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. Result: After screening and evaluation, 10 articles were included. Regarding the diseases studied, the majority were deformities (n = 3) and trauma (n = 3), followed by degenerative diseases (n = 2). Two articles dealt with surgical technique. Six studied the creation of personalized guides for inserting screws; 2 were about education, 1 related to educating patients about their disease and the other to teaching residents surgical technique; 2 other articles addressed surgical planning, where biomodels were printed to study anatomy and surgical programming. Conclusion: Three-dimensional printing biomodels and personalized guides for screw implants are useful for use in spinal surgery. The use of this technology has enabled patient and medical team education, as well as optimizing preoperative planning and reducing surgical time and radiation exposure in spinal surgery.

Introdução: A impressão tridimensional é considerada a "terceira revolução industrial". Foi desenvolvida como inovação promissora para muitas áreas, incluindo a medicina. Há muitas maneiras de usar a impressão 3D em cirurgia da coluna vertebral: educação de pacientes e profissionais de saúde, aplicações pré-operatórias, como planejamento cirúrgico e aplicações intraoperatórias. Objetivo: Realizar atualização e revisão sistemática sobre o uso do 3DP em cirurgia da coluna vertebral. Método: Foi realizada revisão sistemática da literatura na base de dados PubMed em janeiro de 2024, utilizando os termos "spine surgery" e "3D printing". Foram selecionados artigos publicados entre 2014 e 2024 e apenas como ensaios clínicos. Foram excluídos aqueles que não estivessem em inglês ou espanhol. Esta revisão seguiu a diretriz Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Resultado: Após triagem e avaliação, foram incluídos 10 artigos. Em relação às doenças estudadas, a maioria foi de deformidades (n = 3) e traumas (n = 3), seguidas das doenças degenerativas (n = 2). Dois artigos trataram da técnica cirúrgica. Seis estudaram a criação de guias personalizadas para inserção de parafusos; 2 eram sobre educação, 1 relacionado à educação dos pacientes sobre sua doença e outro ao ensino da técnica cirúrgica aos residentes; outros 2 artigos abordaram planejamento cirúrgico, onde foram impressos biomodelos para estudo de anatomia e programação cirúrgica. Conclusão: Biomodelos de impressão tridimensional e guias personalizados para implantes de parafusos são úteis para uso em cirurgia da coluna vertebral. O uso dessa tecnologia possibilitou a educação do paciente e da equipe médica, além de otimizar o planejamento pré-operatório e reduzir o tempo cirúrgico e a exposição à radiação em operações de coluna.

Opioid Use Prior to Adult Spine Deformity Correction Surgery is Associated With Worse Pre- and Postoperative Back Pain and Prolonged Opioid Demands.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter database post-hoc analysis. OBJECTIVES: Opioids are frequently prescribed for painful spinal conditions to provide pain relief and to allow for functional improvement, both before and after spine surgery. Amidst a current opioid epidemic, it is important for providers to understand the impact of opioid use and its relationship with patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pre-/postoperative opioid consumption surrounding ASD and assess patient-reported pain outcomes in older patients undergoing surgery for spinal deformity. METHODS: Patients ≥60 years of age from 12 international centers undergoing spinal fusion of at least 5 levels and a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Patient-reported outcome scores were collected using the Numeric Rating Scale for back and leg pain (NRS-B; NRS-L) at baseline and at 2 years following surgery. Opioid use, defined based on a specific question on case report forms and question 11 from the SRS-22r questionnaire, was assessed at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. RESULT: Of the 219 patients who met inclusion criteria, 179 (81.7%) had 2-year data on opioid use. The percentages of patients reporting opioid use at baseline (n = 75, 34.2%) and 2 years after surgery (n = 55, 30.7%) were similar (P = .23). However, at last follow-up 39% of baseline opioid users (Opi) were no longer taking opioids, while 14% of initial non-users (No-Opi) reported opioid use. Regional pre- and postoperative opioid use was 5.8% and 7.7% in the Asian population, 58.3% and 53.1% in the European, and 50.5% and 40.2% in North American patients, respectively. Baseline opioid users reported more preoperative back pain than the No-Opi group (7.0 vs 5.7, P = .001), while NRS-Leg pain scores were comparable (4.8 vs 4, P = .159). Similarly, at last follow-up, patients in the Opi group had greater NRS-B scores than Non-Opi patients (3.2 vs 2.3, P = .012), but no differences in NRS-Leg pain scores (2.2 vs 2.4, P = .632) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, almost one-third of surgical ASD patients were consuming opioids both pre- and postoperatively world-wide. There were marked international variations, with patients from Asia having a much lower usage rate, suggesting a cultural influence. Despite both opioid users and nonusers benefitting from surgery, preoperative opioid use was strongly associated with significantly more back pain at baseline that persisted at 2-year follow up, as well as persistent postoperative opioid needs.

Exploring the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) Block as a Novel Approach for Improved Pain Management After Spine Surgery: A Comparative Review.

Postoperative pain management following spine surgery remains a significant challenge, often requiring multimodal approaches to achieve adequate analgesia while minimizing side effects. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block has emerged as a novel regional anesthesia technique for addressing this issue. By targeting the interfascial plane between the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum muscles at the thoracolumbar junction, the TLIP block aims to provide targeted analgesia to the surgical site while reducing systemic opioid requirements. This review explores the anatomy, technique, mechanism of action, and clinical evidence supporting the TLIP block for post-spine surgery pain management. Additionally, it compares the TLIP block with traditional pain management approaches and discusses its implications for clinical practice and future research. Overall, the TLIP block shows promise as an effective and potentially safer alternative for post-spine surgery pain management, potentially improving patient outcomes and enhancing recovery. Further research is warranted to optimize its utilization and comprehensively evaluate its long-term effects.

Surgical options in thoracic disc herniation: Evaluating long-term outcomes of 21 cases based on a single-center 10-year experience.

Background: Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH) is a rare pathology that is addressed with relatively challenging surgical approaches, the choice and technical execution of which have been well described in the literature. Interestingly, long-term outcomes, including surgical site pain-related disability, the need for instrumentation, and commonly occurring complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-pleural fistula have not been widely addressed. Here, we address the complication profiles and long-term outcomes of different surgical approaches for TDH. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 21 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for TDH between 2000 and 2010. We assessed post-operative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas, as well as long-term outcomes using Frankel grades, the EQ-5D-3L, and the Visual Analog Scale. We also looked at the need for instrumentation postoperatively. Results: 21 consecutive patients (13 females, 8 males) with a mean age of 55.3 years (Standard deviation 8.1) underwent thoracic discectomy for symptomatic TDH. Surgical approaches included posterolateral thoracotomy (52%, n = 11), costotransversectomy (43%, n = 9), and transpedicular (5%, n = 1). Herniations were classified as soft (38%, n = 8), calcified (38%, n = 8), or calcified-transdural (24%, n = 5). Postoperatively, all patients with calcifiedtransdural herniations undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy (100%, n = 5) developed CSF-pleural fistulas, which resolved spontaneously without the need for surgical re-exploration. 89% (n = 16) of patients exhibited sustained improvement in Frankel scores. Persistent wound site pain was reported by 50% (n = 7) of patients. Conclusion: Despite favorable neurological outcomes, patients with symptomatic TDHs can experience long-term surgical site pain, and therefore, a move toward minimally invasive exposure in such cases should be considered. Postoperative complications such as CSF-pleural fistulas are unlikely to require surgical intervention and thus can be managed conservatively.

Open posterior approach versus endoscopic approach for thoracic ligamentum flavum ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF), a rare condition more prevalent in East Asia, is managed through open and endoscopic surgical approaches. Determining the superior surgical option remains unclear. This study assesses the safety and clinical outcomes associated with these approaches in TOLF patients. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic literature search up to August 5, 2023, across PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reporting complication rates, mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association) scores, JOA scores, VAS (Visual Analog Scale) scores, or hospitalization duration for both open and endoscopic surgeries in TOLF patients. RESULTS: We analyzed 37 studies encompassing 1,646 TOLF patients using a random-effects model. Our findings revealed a significant difference in complication rates (overall complication rates: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.19; p < 0.01; I2: 69%; quality of evidence: moderate), with lower complication rates in the endoscopy group. However, no significant differences were observed in JOA scores (overall JOA: 8.35; 95% CI: 7.16, 9.54; p = 0.12; I2: 99%; quality of evidence: very low), VAS scores (overall VAS: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.59; p = 0.35; I2: 91%; quality of evidence: very low), or hospitalization duration (hospital stay: 10.83 days; 95% CI: 6.86, 14.80; p = 0.35; I2: 91%; quality of evidence: very low) between the open and endoscopic groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reports lower complication rates and improved postoperative mJOA scores for endoscopic surgery in TOLF patients compared to open surgery. It represents the first comprehensive evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety of different surgical approaches for TOLF patients. Further randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings.

Level-specific Comparison of 3D Navigated and Robotic Arm-Guided Screw Placement: An Accuracy Assessment of 1210 Pedicle Screws in Lumbar Surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Robotic spine surgery, utilizing 3D imaging and robotic arms, has been shown to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement compared to conventional methods, although its superiority remains under debate. There are few studies evaluating the accuracy of 3D navigated versus robotic-guided screw placement across lumbar levels, addressing anatomical challenges to refine surgical strategies and patient safety. PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the pedicle screw placement accuracy between 3D navigation and robotic arm-guided systems across distinct lumbar levels. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing fusion surgery with pedicle screw placement in the prone position, using either via 3D image navigation only or robotic arm guidance OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographical screw accuracy was assessed by the postoperative computed tomography (CT) according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, particularly focused on accuracy at different lumbar levels. METHODS: Accuracy of screw placement in the 3D navigation (Nav group) and robotic arm guidance (Robo group) was compared using Chi-squared test/Fisher's exact test with effect size measured by Cramer's V, both overall and at each specific lumbosacral spinal level. RESULTS: A total of 321 patients were included (Nav, 157; Robo, 189) and evaluated 1210 screws (Nav, 651; Robo 559). The Robo group demonstrated significantly higher overall accuracy (98.6 vs. 93.9%; P<0.001, V=0.25). This difference of no breach screw rate was signified the most at the L3 level (No breach screw: Robo 91.3 vs. 57.8%, P<0.001, V=0.35) followed by L4 (89.6 vs. 64.7%, P<0.001, V=0.28), and L5 (92.0 vs. 74.5%, P<0.001, V=0.22). However, screw accuracy at S1 was not significant between the groups (81.1 vs. 72.0%, V=0.10). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the enhanced accuracy of robotic arm-guided systems compared to 3D navigation for pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusion surgeries, especially at the L3, L4, and L5 levels. However, at the S1 level, both systems exhibit similar effectiveness, underscoring the importance of understanding each system's specific advantages for optimization of surgical complications.

Novel Combination of Lateral Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Ipsi-Contra Decompression for Severe Stenosis From Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Case Report.

Minimally invasive surgical approaches to the spine that leverage indirect decompression are gaining increasing popularity. While there is excellent literature on the value of indirect decompression, there are limitations to this procedure. Specifically, in patients with severe stenosis and neurogenic claudication, there is a concern among many surgeons regarding the adequacy of indirect decompression alone. In these cases, the lateral approach is often abandoned in favor of an open posterior or posterior minimally invasive approach. Unfortunately, some of the distinct benefits of the direct lateral approach are then lost. Here, we present the case of a 58-year-old male who underwent an L4-L5 lateral interbody fusion with an endoscopic ipsi-contra decompression to achieve both direct and indirect treatment of severe neuroforaminal and central stenosis. From this strategy, this patient had complete pre-operative symptom resolution and was able to return to work immediately after surgery without significant restriction. Combining the benefits of direct and indirect using an ultra-minimally invasive decompressive approach offers a potential solution.

Navigating challenges in spine surgery in Nigeria: the current state and strategies for advancing spine care.

The provision of specialized spine care in Nigeria presents a pressing challenge amid limited resources and geographical disparities. This correspondence offers a comprehensive roadmap for improving spine surgery and care within the country. We examine the current state of spinal health infrastructure, highlighting barriers such as limited access to specialists and facilities, particularly in rural areas, and financial constraints for patients. Innovations in spinal treatment, including the adoption of minimally invasive techniques and advancements in surgical modalities, are discussed alongside persistent challenges such as disparities in access and equipment costs. Training and education of spine surgeons emerge as critical areas requiring attention, with a shortage of qualified professionals exacerbated by inadequate training programs and resource constraints. We advocate for fostering local and international collaborations to address these gaps, emphasizing the role of partnerships in capacity building and knowledge exchange. Additionally, we explore the potential of public-private partnerships and investments to enhance the Nigerian spine healthcare system, calling for strategic initiatives to modernize infrastructure and improve accessibility. Finally, we propose a strategic blueprint encompassing infrastructure enhancement, training programs, research initiatives, policy advocacy, and public awareness campaigns. Through concerted efforts from local stakeholders and international partners, we envision a future where spine care in Nigeria is comprehensive, accessible, and of high quality, leading to improved health outcomes and a higher quality of life for those affected by spinal conditions.

Association of Untreated Pre-surgical Depression With Pain and Outcomes After Spinal Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: Untreated pre-surgical depression may prolong post-surgical pain and hinder recovery. However, research on the impact of untreated pre-surgical depression on post-spinal surgery pain is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to assess pre-surgical depression in patients and analyze its relationship with post-surgical pain and overall post-surgical outcomes. METHODS: We recruited 100 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery due to spondylolisthesis, degenerative lumbar disc diseases, and herniated lumbar disc diseases. Psychiatrists evaluated them for the final selection. We assessed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQoL 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scores, numerical back and leg pain scales, and medication dosage data collected before and at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were included in this study; 40 and 51 were allocated to the control and depression groups, respectively. The pre- and post-surgical leg pain, back pain, and functional scores were not different. However, the depression group showed higher ODI and EQ-5D and lower JOA scores than the control group 3 months post-surgery. Partial correlation analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the JOA and BDI scores and a positive correlation between the EQ-5D and BDI scores at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Untreated depression can prolong postoperative pain and hinder recovery. Detecting and treating depression in patients before spine surgery may improve their overall quality of life and functional recovery.

Does obesity and varying body mass index affect the clinical outcomes and safety of biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression? A comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic spine surgery has recently grown in popularity due to the potential benefits of reduced pain and faster recovery time as compared to open surgery. Biportal spinal endoscopy has been successfully applied to lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Obesity is associated with increased risk of complications in spine surgery. Few prior studies have investigated the impact of obesity and associated medical comorbidities with biportal spinal endoscopy. METHODS: This study was a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed comparative cohort design. Patients were divided into cohorts of normal body weight (Bone Mass Index (BMI)18.0-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9) and obese (BMI > 30.0) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution for treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Demographic data, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Statistics were calculated amongst treatment groups using analysis of variance and chi square where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were followed. 26 (30.1%) were normal BMI, 35 (41.7%) were overweight and 23 (27.4%) were obese. Patients with increasing BMI had correspondingly greater American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores. There were no significant differences in VAS Back, VAS Leg, and ODI scores, or postoperative complications among the cohorts. There were no cases of surgical site infections in the cohort. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvement up to 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that obesity is not a risk factor for increased perioperative complications with biportal spinal endoscopy and has similar clinical outcomes and safety profile as compared to patients with normal BMI. Biportal spinal endoscopy is a promising alternative to traditional techniques to treat common lumbar pathology.

Surgical management of spinal intradural metastatic pathologies: a case-based review.

Intradural spinal metastases significantly impair neurological function and quality of life, necessitating multimodal, palliative management to preserve mobility and alleviate pain. The effectiveness of systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy is limited due to the blood-spinal cord barrier and the tumours' radioresistance, respectively. This highlights the urgency for alternative treatments given the rapid neurological decline. Surgical intervention becomes crucial, focusing on maximum tumour debulking to enhance disease control, restore ambulation, and palliate symptoms without compromising neurological function. Achieving this involves meticulous preoperative planning and aggressive intraoperative neuromonitoring. Combining surgery with adjuvant therapies may improve local control and potentially delay recurrence. This case-based review emphasizes the surgical considerations and outcomes in two cases of intradural spinal metastases, underscoring the value of surgery in multimodal therapy.