Ten-Year Follow-Up After Chemotherapy and Conversion Surgery for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Stage IV Esophagogastric Junction Cancer With a Pathological Complete Response: A Case Report.

Recent reports have focused on the usefulness of conversion surgery, in which chemotherapy is given to patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC), and radical surgery is subsequently performed if resection becomes possible; however, no consensus has been reached regarding the usefulness of this strategy. We report on a 74-year-old man who was diagnosed with esophagogastric junction cancer (T3N3M1 (LYM): stage IV). Chemotherapy was chosen and seven courses of S1 + cisplatin (SP) + trastuzumab (HCN) and two courses of S1 + HCN were administered. Approximately 10 months after the start of chemotherapy, the tumor had almost disappeared and we therefore decided to perform conversion surgery. Pathologic examination of the specimen and dissected lymph nodes showed no cancer. Postoperatively, the patient underwent chemotherapy until the second postoperative year, and no metastasis or recurrence was observed for nine years after surgery. Conversion surgery after chemotherapy resulted in recurrence-free survival in this case; however, further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of surgery after chemotherapy for patients with stage IV GC, as chemotherapy continues to evolve.

Clinical impact of very early recurrence after conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer.

Background: The development and improved response to chemotherapy has resulted in a survival benefit of conversion surgery (CS) for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, this benefit is limited in some cases, such as in those with very early recurrence (VER). This study investigated the relationship between outcome and clinicopathological characteristics after CS for stage IV GC, and the risk factors for VER after CS. Methods: We retrospectively studied 184 patients with stage IV GC who initially underwent chemotherapy, including 36 patients who underwent CS between May 2007 and January 2022. We evaluated the long-term outcome after CS for stage IV GC and the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients who underwent CS. Results: Median survival times (MSTs) in the chemotherapy alone and CS groups were 13.4 and 36.5 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Of the 27 patients who underwent R0 resection, 22 remained free of early recurrence and five experienced VER. MSTs in the VER and free of early recurrence groups were 15.2 and 44.1 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients had liver metastasis before initial treatment in the VER group than in the FER group (p = 0.016). There were more patients with preoperative PNI <40 in the VER group (p = 0.046). Conclusion: CS is an effective treatment for stage IV GC, but VER is associated with poor prognosis. We need to carefully consider the indications for CS, especially for patients with poor nutritional status and liver metastases.

Terapia de conversión en cáncer gástrico: experiencia del Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia / Conversion therapy in gastric cancer: experience at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia

RESUMEN Antecedentes: el cáncer gástrico (CG) representa un problema de salud pública en Colombia y el mundo. Dado que la mayoría de los pacientes se encuentran en estadios avanzados en el momento del diagnóstico. desarrollar estrategias de manejo. como la terapia de conversión (TC). es una necesidad cada vez mayor en su tratamiento. Objetivo: estimar los resultados con la TC en el tratamiento de pacientes con CG avanzado en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia (INC). Material y métodos: serie de casos de pacientes con adenocarcinoma gástrico incurable llevados a quimioterapia de inducción y cirugía con intención curativa. entre los años 2010 y 2021. Se revisaron de forma retrospectiva los datos clínico-patológicos y de supervivencia. La supervivencia global (SG) se calculó desde la fecha de la primera quimioterapia hasta la muerte. Las funciones de supervivencia se estimaron con tablas de vida y por el método de Kaplan-Meier y se realizaron curvas de supervivencia a 3 y 5 años. Resultados: se analizaron los datos de 23 pacientes con edad promedio de 56 años. 17 (74%) fueron varones. El criterio de irresecabilidad más frecuente fue un tumor T4b en 13 casos (56.5%). Todos recibieron TC. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 28 meses. Se documentaron 11 recurrencias (52%). La mediana de supervivencia fue de 41.2 meses y la SG a 3 y 5 años de 57.7% y 38.5%. respectivamente. Conclusiones: la TC permitió obtener una SG aceptable de pacientes seleccionados con CG avanzado incurable. Esta estrategia requiere una cuidadosa selección y manejo multidisciplinario en centros oncológicos de referencia.

ABSTRACT Background: Gastric cancer (GC) represents a public health problem in Colombia and worldwide. Since most patients are at advanced stages at the time of diagnosis. it is necessary to develop management strategies as conversion therapy (CT). Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the results of CT for treating patients with advanced and GC at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de Colombia (INC). Material and methods: We included patients with incurable gastric cancer who underwent induction chemotherapy and intended curative surgery between 2010 and 2021. The clinical and pathological data and survival of the patients included were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the time of initiation of chemotherapy until the date of death. Survival functions were estimated using the life table and Kaplan-Meier methods. and survival curves at 3 and 5 years were constructed. Results: 23 patients were analyzed; mean age was 56 years. and 17 (74%) were men. The most common criterion indicating unresectability was a T4b tumor in 13 cases (56.5%). All the patients underwent CT. Median follow-up was 28 months. Eleven patients developed disease recurrence (52%). Median survival was 41.2 months. and 3- and 5-year OS was 57.7% and 38.5%. respectively. Conclusions: CT provided an acceptable OS rate for selected patients with incurable advanced GC. This strategy requires an adequate selection of patients and multidisciplinary management in reference oncology centers.

A pragmatic approach improves the clinical management of stage IV gastric cancer: Comparison between the Meta-Gastro results and the GIRCG's retrospective series.

INTRODUCTION: The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer developed a prospective database about stage IV gastric cancer, to evaluate how a pragmatic attitude impacts the management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected data about metastatic gastric cancer patients thanks to cooperation between radiologists, oncologists and surgeons and we analyzed survival and prognostic factors, comparing the results to those obtained in our retrospective study. RESULTS: Three-hundred and eighty-three patients were enrolled from 2018 to September 2022. We observed a higher percentage of laparoscopic exploration with peritoneal lavage in the prospective cohort. In the registry only 3.6 % of patients was submitted to surgery without associated chemotherapy, while in the retrospective population 44.3 % of patients were operated on without any chemotherapy. At univariate and multivariate analyses, the different metastatic sites did not show any survival differences among each other (OS 20.0 vs 16.10 vs 16.7 months for lymphnodal, peritoneal and hepatic metastases, respectively), while the number of metastatic sites and the type of treatment showed a statistical significance (OS 16,7 vs 13,0 vs 4,5 months for 1, 2 and 3 different metastatic sites respectively, p < 0.001; 24,2 vs 12,0 vs 2,5 months for surgery with/without chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone and best supportive treatment respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight that the different metastatic sites did not show different survivals, but survival is worse in case of multiple localization. In patients where a curative resection can be achieved, acceptable survival rates are possible. A better diagnostic workup and a more accurate staging impact favorably upon survival.

Successful second conversion surgery after trastuzumab deruxtecan for recurrent HER2-positive gastric cancer.

A 65-year-old woman with HER2-positive gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases underwent first conversion surgery of gastrectomy with D2 lymph nodes dissection and three liver metastases after combination therapy with capecitabine, cisplatin, and trastuzumab. Two years later, she experienced multiple liver metastases that were refractory to combination therapy with paclitaxel albumin-bound nanoparticles and ramucirumab. She participated in the DESTINY-Gastric01 trial and received tri-weekly trastuzumab deruxtecan as third-line treatment for 26 cycles. The recurrent lesions markedly shrank, and this effect continued for 19 months. We then performed partial hepatectomy for the one remaining lesion. No adjuvant chemotherapy was given, and she remains alive without recurrence 18 months after the second conversion surgery. Trastuzumab deruxtecan may generate a notable tumor response and subsequent conversion surgery could be a treatment option for HER2-positive stage IV gastric cancer.

Jejunostomy in the palliative treatment of gastric cancer: A clinical prognostic score.

BACKGROUND: Clinical stage IV gastric cancer (GC) may need palliative procedures in the presence of symptoms such as obstruction. When palliative resection is not possible, jejunostomy is one of the options. However, the limited survival of these patients raises doubts about who benefits from this procedure. AIM: To create a prognostic score based on clinical variables for 90-d mortality for GC patients after palliative jejunostomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Stage IV GC who underwent jejunostomy. Eleven preoperative clinical variables were selected to define the score categories, with 90-d mortality as the main outcome. After randomization, patients were divided equally into two groups: Development (J1) and validation (J2). The following variables were used: Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA), Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI), hemoglobin levels, albumin levels, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor size, presence of ascites by computed tomography (CT), and the number of disease sites. The score performance metric was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) to define low and high-risk groups. RESULTS: Of the 363 patients with clinical stage IVCG, 80 (22%) patients underwent jejunostomy. Patients were predominantly male (62.5%) with a mean age of 62.4 years old. After randomization, the binary logistic regression analysis was performed and points were assigned to the clinical variables to build the score. The high NLR had the highest value. The ROC curve derived from these pooled parameters had an AUC of 0.712 (95%CI: 0.537-0.887, P = 0.022) to define risk groups. In the validation cohort, the diagnostic accuracy for 90-d mortality based on the score had an AUC of 0.756, (95%CI: 0.598-0.915, P = 0.006). According to the cutoff, in the validation cohort BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 (P < 0.001), CCI ≥ 1 (P = 0.001), ASA III/IV (P = 0.002), high NLR (P = 0.012), and the presence of ascites on CT exam (P = 0.004) were significantly associated with the high-risk group. The risk groups showed a significant association with first-line (P = 0.012), second-line chemotherapy (P = 0.009), 30-d (P = 0.013), and 90-d mortality (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The scoring system developed with 11 variables related to patient's performance status and medical condition was able to distinguish patients undergoing jejunostomy with high risk of 90 d mortality.

Correlation between L3 skeletal muscle index and prognosis of patients with stage IV gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the prognosis of patients with stage IV gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A total of 27 patients with stage IV GC requiring chemotherapy admitted to our hospital from 1 April 2015 to 20 May 2019 were selected as participants. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the survival time of all participants. By evaluating the L3 plane CT images, the mass index (cm2/m2) of L3 skeletal muscle (including psoas major, erector spinae, quadratus psoas, transversus abdominis, external oblique abdominis, and internal oblique abdominis) was calculated to study the changes of L3 SMI during treatment and the correlation between L3 SMI and clinical features. The log-rank method was used to analyze the correlativity between the survival time of patients and their general data, L3 SMI, or other indicators. RESULTS: The survival time of 27 patients with stage IV GC was 7.4-49.9 months, with a mean survival time of 19.72 months and a median survival time of 16.17 months. The 1-year survival rate was 77.78%, and the 3-year survival rate was 7.41%. During treatment, L3 SMI continued to decline in 20 of the 27 participants (74.07%). After the first chemotherapy, 17 participants (62.96%) met the criteria of sarcopenia syndrome, and after the fourth chemotherapy, 19 participants (70.37%) met the criteria of sarcopenia syndrome. The L3 SMI was shown to be significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) and Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) (both P<0.05), but not with age, gender, dietary intake, and primary site (all P>0.05). Log-rank test showed that there was a correlation between L3 SMI and survival time of patients (P<0.05). The average survival time of participants with sarcopenia syndrome (16.78 months) was significantly lower than that of those without sarcopenia syndrome (25.58 months) (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between L3 SMI and survival time, and L3 SMI can be used as a potential index to evaluate the prognosis of patients with stage IV GC.

Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors.

BACKGROUND: In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes. METHODS: The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed. RESULTS: We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1-2 and pN0-1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

Current status of conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer.

Palliative chemotherapy with best supportive care is a mainstay for patients with gastric cancer (GC) and distant metastasis. However, with advances in GC chemotherapy, multimodal treatment, including perioperative chemotherapy plus conversion surgery, has attracted attention as a new strategy to improve the outcome of patients with stage IV disease. Conversion surgery is defined as surgical treatment aimed at R0 resection after a good response to induction chemotherapy for tumors originally considered unresectable or marginally resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons. Various biological characteristics differ, depending on each metastatic condition in stage IV GC. The main metastatic pathways of GC can be divided into three categories: lymphatic, hematogenous, and peritoneal. In each category, considerable historical data on conversion surgery have demonstrated the benefits of individualized approaches. However, owing to the diversity of these conditions, a common definition, including the choice of induction chemotherapy, optimal timing of resection, and eligibility for conversion surgery, has not been established among surgical oncologists. Thus, we explore the current and future treatment options by reviewing the literature on this controversial topic comprehensively.

Tumor microenvironment characterization in stage IV gastric cancer.

Immunotherapy is remarkably affected by the immune environment of the principal tumor. Nonetheless, the immune environment's clinical relevance in stage IV gastric cancer (GC) is largely unknown. The gene expression profiles of 403 stage IV GC patients in the three cohorts: GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE84437 (n=292) and GSE62254 (n=77), and TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas, n=34) were used in the present study. Using four publicly available stage IV GC expression datasets, 29 immune signatures were expression profiled, and on this basis, we classified stage IV GC. The classification was conducted using the hierarchical clustering method. Three stage IV GC subtypes L, M, and H were identified representing low, medium, and high immunity, respectively. Immune correlation analysis of these three types revealed that Immune H exhibited a better prognostic outcome as well as a higher immune score compared with other subtypes. There was a noticeable difference in the three subgroups of HLA genes. Further, on comparing with other subtypes, CD86, CD80, CD274, CTLA4, PDCD1, and PDCD1LG2 had higher expression in the Immunity H subtype. In stage IV GC, potentially positive associations between immune and pathway activities were displayed, due to the enrichment of pathways including TNF signaling, Th-17 cell differentiation, and JAK-STAT signaling pathways in Immunity H vs Immunity L subtypes. External cohorts from TCGA cohort ratified these results. The identification of stage IV GC subtypes has potential clinical implications in stage IV GC treatment.

Prognostic value and association of systemic inflammation for patients with stage IV gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The present study is aimed at investigating the prognostic value and association of systemic inflammation (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-to-monocytes ratio) for patients with stage IV gastric cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with stage IV gastric cancer between January 2008 and December 2017 were included. A summary was performed on clinicopathological characteristics and a multivariate cox regression analysis was performed to identify the prognostic factors. RESULTS: 304 patients with stage IV gastric cancer were included in the study. On multivariate analysis, the systemic chemotherapy (p < .001), the jaundice (p = .004), the high neutrophil-to-lym- phocyte ratio (p = .005) and the high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (p = .041) were independent prognostic factors for patients with stage IV gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: As systemic inflammation response markers, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are significantly associated with OS for stage IV gastric cancer patients. Systemic chemotherapy shows a clear overall survival benefit in patients with stage IV gastric cancer and Jaundice indicates poor overall survival.

Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Gastric Cancer.

The prognosis of stage IV gastric cancer (GC) is poor, with palliative chemotherapy remaining the main therapeutic option. Studies increasingly indicate that patients with unresectable stage IV GC, who undergo gastrectomy with radical intention after responding to several regimens of combined chemotherapy, can achieve good survival outcomes. Thus, surgery aiming at radical resection for unresectable stage IV GC after combined chemotherapy has received increasing attention in recent years. This novel therapeutic strategy was defined as conversion surgery in patients with unresectable stage IV GC and it can associate with significant improved survival when R0 resection can be achieved. Despite the recent advances in conversion surgery for patients with unresectable stage IV GC, selection criteria for combination chemotherapy regimens, indications for conversion surgery, optimal timing to surgery, and postoperative chemotherapy all remain controversial. This article reviews the current state of conversion surgery for unresectable stage IV GC.

Survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy in stage IV gastric signet ring cell carcinoma patients: A large population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Stage IV gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a type of malignant gastric cancer (GC) with poorer survival compared to metastatic non-SRCC gastric cancer (NOS). However, chemotherapy alone was unable to maintain long-term survival. This study aimed to evaluate survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (PG+C) for metastatic gastric SRCC. METHODS: We obtained data on gastric cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical methods included χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, COX models, propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Among 27 240 gastric cancer patients included, 4638 (17.03%) were SRCC patients. The proportion of patients with younger age, female gender, poorly differentiated grade and M1 stage was higher in SRCC than in NOS (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple metastatic sites (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.14-1.69, P = .001) was associated with increased mortality risk in metastatic SRCC. Median survival time was improved in metastatic SRCC receiving PG+C compared to PG/C alone (13 vs 7 months, P < .001). Notably, in subgroup analysis, 13 of 17 groups of metastatic SRCC patients with PG+C had prolonged overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone, especially for those with only one metastatic site (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.73, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that there exists at least a selective group of stage IV gastric SRCC patients, who could benefit from palliative gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. Further prospective trials are needed to support our conclusion.

Conversion gastrectomy for stage IV unresectable gastric cancer: a GIRCG retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report the experience with conversion surgery from six Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Cancro Gastrico (GIRCG) centers, focusing our analysis on factors affecting survival and the risk of recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in patients who had undergone conversion gastrectomy between 2005 and 2017. Data were extracted from a GIRCG database including all metastatic gastric cancer patients submitted to surgery. Only stage IV unresectable tumors/metastases which became resectable after chemotherapy were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Forty-five resected M1 patients were included in the analysis. Reasons for being deemed unresectable at diagnosis were peritoneal involvement (PCI > 6) (n = 38, 84.4%), distant metastatic nodes (n = 3, 6.6%) and extensive liver involvement (n = 4, 8.8%). Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 9-50). Median overall survival from surgery was 15 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 57.2, 36.1 and 24%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 12 months with 1- and 3-year survival of 46.4 and 33.9%, respectively. At cox regression analysis the only independent prognostic factor for OS was the presence of more than one type of metastasis (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.72-11.3, p = 0.002). A positive microscopic resection margin was the only risk factor for recurrence (HR 5.72, 95% CI 1.04-31.4, p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Unresectable stage IV GC patients could benefit from radical surgery after chemotherapy and achieve long survivals. The main prognostic factor for these patients was the presence of more than one type of extra-gastric metastatic involvement.

Strategy for treatment of stage IV human epidermal growth factor 2-positive gastric cancer: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of stage IV gastric cancer and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer is poor, although new drugs and regimens have been developed. We report a case of a patient with stage IV HER2-positive gastric cancer treated successfully by conversion therapy and trastuzumab. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 73-year-old Japanese man diagnosed as L, type 3, circ, T4aNxCy1P1M1, stage IV (the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma). The patient was treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and TS-1 (DCS regimen). After two courses of the regimen, peritoneal dissemination disappeared, and peritoneal lavage cytology revealed no tumor cells in the abdominal cavity. Subsequently, he underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+. Pathological findings were ypT2(MP), ypN2(3/15), ypP0, ypCY0, M0, ypstage II. He received TS-1 as an adjuvant chemotherapy, but he had peritoneal recurrence. The original gastric cancer was HER2-positive. We therefore treated him with TS-1 with trastuzumab. This regimen was quite effective and achieved a complete response. After complete response, we switched the patient to trastuzumab monotherapy. He had no evidence of recurrence for 6 years, 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: DCS regimen, R0 resection, and adjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab can be a powerful strategy for stage IV HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cancer-related cause of death worldwide. In locally advanced tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been introduced in most international Western guidelines. For metastatic and unresectable disease, there is still debate regarding correct management and the role of surgery. The standard approach for stage IV GC is palliative chemotherapy. Over the last decade, an increasing number of M1 patients who responded to palliative regimens of induction chemotherapy have been subsequently undergone surgery with curative intent. The objective of the present review is to analyze the literature regarding this approach, known as "conversion surgery", which has become one of the most commonly adopted therapeutic options. It is defined as a treatment aiming at an R0 resection after chemotherapy in initially unresectable tumors. The 13 retrospective studies analyzed, with a total of 411 patients treated with conversion therapy, clearly show that even if standardization of unresectable and metastatic criteria, post-chemotherapy resectability evaluation and timing of surgery has not yet been established, an R0 surgery after induction chemotherapy with partial or complete response seems to offer superior survival results than chemotherapy alone. Additional larger sample-size randomized control trials are needed to identify subgroups of well-stratified patients who could benefit from this multimodal approach.

Terapia de conversión en cáncer gástrico estadio IV: a propósito de un caso / Case Report of Conversion Therapy in Stage IV Gastric Cancer

Resumen Se reporta el caso de una paciente de 47 años, con diagnóstico inicial de un tumor de Krukenberg por una lesión anexial de 10 cm de diámetro y una lesión corporal gástrica de 3 cm. La biopsia mostró un adenocarcinoma pobremente diferenciado con células en anillo de sello. Una laparoscopia inicial mostró un índice de carcinomatosis peritoneal (ICP) de 24, por lo cual se le indica a la paciente quimioterapia con intención paliativa (cisplatino y capecitabina). Con mejoría clínica importante, respuesta adecuada y favorable a la quimioterapia, la paciente se remitió a una salpingo-ooforectomía bilateral. Continúa con quimioterapia evidenciándose mejoría de las imágenes tomográficas y una excelente respuesta clínica. Por este motivo, se decide en conjunto con la familia llevarla a cirugía. Se le practica una gastrectomía total con linfadenectomía D2 con intención curativa. La paciente recibe quimioterapia con capecitabina y cisplatino por 3 meses más, hasta cuando se evidencia compromiso ganglionar paraaórtico, por lo que es necesario reiniciar la quimioterapia con un nuevo esquema, entonces se le formula irinotecán. La paciente completa 22 meses desde el diagnóstico inicial, la condición clínica es muy buena y está asintomática.

Abstract We report the case of a 47-year-old patient initially diagnosed with a Krukenberg tumor, an adnexal lesion 10 cm in diameter and a 3 cm lesion in the gastric corpus. A biopsy showed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells. Initial laparoscopy showed an index of peritoneal carcinomatosis of 24 which indicated chemotherapy with palliative intent (cisplatin and capecitabine). The patient improved significantly and underwent a total hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy. Chemotherapy continued with excellent clinical response as evidenced in CT scans. Together with the patient's family, it was decided that she should undergo surgery. A total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy with curative intent was performed. The patient continued to receive capecitabine and cisplatin for three more months until para-aortic lymph node involvement was demonstrated and it became necessary to restart chemotherapy with a new scheme using iriniotecan. The patient has completed 22 months after the initial diagnosis in very good and clinical condition without symptoms.

Will molecular target agents enable the multidisciplinary treatment in stage IV gastric cancer?

A detailed molecular characterization of gastric cancer has been revealed by global initiatives and a number of new molecular agents are under investigation. Currently only trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), is clinically used for HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer patients and ramucirumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular ligand-binding domain of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)2, can be used in second line. However, despite the progress in gastric cancer treatment, the prognosis of stage IV gastric cancer patients remains dismal. To achieve a remarkable improvement in the prognosis of patients, a multidisciplinary treatment approach with the help of effective molecular target agents should be considered. So far the role of multidisciplinary treatment for stage IV gastric cancer is still uncertain due to limited available data and absence of long-lasting tumor control with systemic therapy. Herein, an overview of the latest developments of molecular targeted agents for gastric cancer in advanced stages, in the perioperative setting and in oligometastatic disease is provided. The possibility of a multidisciplinary strategy using molecular target agents and surgery for stage IV gastric cancer is also assessed.

Utility of Inflammatory Marker- and Nutritional Status-based Prognostic Factors for Predicting the Prognosis of Stage IV Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Non-curative Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study aimed to compare the utility of various inflammatory marker- and nutritional status-based prognostic factors, including many previous established prognostic factors, for predicting the prognosis of stage IV gastric cancer patients undergoing non-curative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients with stage IV gastric cancer who had undergone palliative gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationships between the mGPS, PNI, NLR, PLR, the CONUT, various clinicopathological factors and cancer-specific survival (CS). RESULTS: Among patients who received non-curative surgery, univariate analysis of CS identified the following significant risk factors: chemotherapy, mGPS and NLR, and multivariate analysis revealed that the mGPS was independently associated with CS. CONCLUSION: The mGPS was a more useful prognostic factor than the PNI, NLR, PLR and CONUT in patients undergoing non-curative surgery for stage IV gastric cancer.

The impact and optimal indication of non-curative gastric resection for stage IV advanced gastric cancer diagnosed during surgery: 10 years of experience at a single institute.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage IV gastric cancer is still unclear. METHODS: Of the patients who underwent open abdominal surgery that was preoperatively intended to be a radical excision procedure for gastric cancer, 72 were diagnosed with stage IV during the operation. At this institution, non-curative gastric resection is performed whenever possible. RESULTS: Non-curative gastric resection was performed in 44 of the 72 patients. According to the survival analysis, the median survival times in the gastric resection and no-resection groups were 1.9 and 0.9 years, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.014). Based on the multivariate analysis, we selected gastric resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.309; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.152-0.615) and postoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.136; 95% CI = 0.056-0.353) as independent factors associated with overall survival (OS). In the subgroup analyses of OS, the factors that were associated with gastric resection having no survival benefit were the existence of distant lymph node or liver metastasis (p = 0.527) and the lack of postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.589). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have distant lymph node or liver metastasis and those who will not undergo postoperative chemotherapy, non-curative gastric resection has no survival benefit.