[Use of physical restraints in the elderly in an emergency department. Analysis of clinical, environmental and health care team organization factors associated with decision making]. / Uso de sujeciones físicas en ancianos atendidos en un servicio de urgencias. Análisis de los factores clínicos, del entorno y de la organización del equipo sanitario asociados en la toma de decisiones.

OBJETIVE: To determine the influence of different factors involved in the decision to apply physical restraints (PR) in the management the elderly people with conduct disorders in an emergency department (ED) METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in the ED of the Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa (Leganés, Madrid). We included 125 elderly people with disruptive behaviors and collected clinical, patient handling, organizational and environmental variables. Individuals who had undergone PR were analyzed to learn what factors were related to the final decision to restrain. RESULTS: 32.8% of the participants underwent PR. The aspects that most influenced the decision to restrain were those related to the organization and environment: specific staff training decreased the probability of restraint by 50% (P<.05) and good support from the whole team reduced the risk of using SF by up to 75% (P<.0005). Related patient handling factors such as verbal restraint, pain relief, family accompaniment and early mobilization significantly reduced the use of PR (P<.05). The only patient-dependent clinical aspect that increased the risk of SF was male sex (P<.05). Other factors unrelated to the probability of applying PR were, among others, nurse-patient ratio, type of behavior, age, or functional/cognitive status. CONCLUSIONS: Exclusively clinical factors of the patient had little influence on the decision to restrain the elderly in an ED. However, environmental, organizational, and behavioral handling variables could favor more respectful alternatives and thus reduce the use of PR in the elderly with disruptive behaviors in the ED.

[Physical restraint use in relation to falls risk in a nursing home]. / Uso de sujeciones físicas en relación con el riesgo de caídas en una residencia de ancianos.

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: The use of physical restraints (PR) is common in the care of the elderly. However, their efficacy and safety are not supported by scientific evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the role of PR in preventing falls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used, in which each fall incident (n=575) was examined in the residents over 65 years of age who resided at the one nursing homes from February 2009 to September 2013. An analysis was made of the association between the use of PR and risk of falls using a multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for the characteristics of residents that were associated with the use of PR according to a bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Risk factors for falls after accounting for PR use, include: risk of falling (Tinetti test) (OR 4.57; 95% CI 1.76-11.75); ability to walk (OR 6.40; 95% CI 2.78-14.74); hearing impairment (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.05-4.29); and history of a previous fall (OR 17.81; 95% CI 8.83-35.93). The risk of falls was greater in restrained, ambulatory residents with cognitive impairment (OR 18.95; 95% CI 7.06-50.85). No differences were found in injuries between falls that occurred with and without PR. CONCLUSIONS: Restraint use was not significantly associated with fewer falls and injuries. The risk of falls could increase in ambulatory residents with cognitive impairment. The study results suggest the need to consider whether restraints provide adequate protection against the risk of falls.

[Effectiveness of training interventions aimed at reducing physical restraints in institutionalised older people: A systematic review]. / Efectividad de las intervenciones dirigidas a reducir las sujeciones físicas en personas mayores de 65años institucionalizadas: una revisión sistemática.

There is some controversy about the use of physical restraints in institutionalised elderly people. The aim of this review is to analyse studies that evaluated the effectiveness of training interventions targeting interdisciplinary teams aimed at preventing, reducing or eliminating the use of physical restraints in nursing homes. A systematic search was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science to find clinical trials, published in English or in Spanish, that examined training sessions for interdisciplinary teams aimed at preventing, minimising or eliminating the use of physical restrains in institutionalised people over 65 years. Ten papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The findings show conflicting results on the effectiveness of training sessions. Furthermore, they lack sufficient empirical evidence to be able to assert that training sessions brought about a reduction in the use of physical restraints. More studies are needed that analyse the effectiveness of these interventions to prevent or eliminate the use of physical restraints in these institutions.

[Effects of a physical restraint removal program on older people with dementia in residential care]. / Efectos de un programa de eliminación de sujeciones físicas sobre personas mayores con demencia en residencias.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the results of removing physical restraints from elderly patients with dementia living in nursing homes. This objective is part of a wider process of change in residential care. METHODS: Quasi-experimental study conducted in two residences from May 2010 to May 2012. Information was collected at 7 time points and longitudinal analyses were performed. After training staff, the physical restraints in El Puig centre were phased out, while in the Conarda centre, restraints were still applied to elderly people. The main variables studied were: falls, psychotropic medication prescriptions, different indicators of mental impairment, and degree of dependence (Norton, NPI, Mini-mental, Tinetti, Barthel). RESULTS: In the El Puig centre all the physical restraints were removed. A slight improvement was seen in the number of falls, and their consequences. The ANOVA showed significant improvements in the centre that removed restraints in prescribing psychotropic medications, cognitive impairment, and behavioural changes. DISCUSSION: It is shown that removing physical restraints do not cause negative effects as regards the number of falls, and also positively affects the welfare and independence of elderly people (through changes in behaviour and mental impairment). Furthermore, it is demonstrated that this program must be accompanied by the reduction and control of medicines (withdrawal of the number of psychotropic prescriptions).