Evaluation of the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. Baumannii by the broth disk elution test.

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii using the broth disk elution testing, a total of 150 A. baumannii isolates were collected from across China between January 2019 and January 2021, including 51 carbapenem-susceptible and 99 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Broth disk elution (BDE) and the broth microdilution (BMD) method were performed for all strains. The concentration range of the BDE was 10/10 µg/mL, 20/20 µg/mL, and 30/30 µg/mL for ampicillin-sulbactam, and 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, 112.5/45 µg/mL, and 150/60 µg/mL for cefoperazone-sulbactam, respectively. Compared with BMD, the BDE results of ampicillin-sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam showed a categorical agreement of 83.3% (125/150) and 95.3% (143/150), with minor errors of 16.7% (25/150) and 4.7% (7/150), respectively. No major error or very major errors were detected. The sensitivity differences by BDE of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAb) to different concentrations of ampicillin-sulbactam showed statistically significant (p < 0.017), while those to cefoperazone-sulbactam at 37.5/15 µg/mL, 75/30 µg/mL, and 112.5/45 µg/mL were significant (p < 0.008). However, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between 112.5/45 µg/mL and 150/60 µg/mL (p > 0.008). In conclusion, the BDE is a reliable and convenient method to detect the in vitro activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against A. baumannii, and the results could serve as a clinical reference value when deciding whether or not to use high-dose sulbactam for the treatment of A. baumannii infections.

Multicenter study on clinical outcomes and poor prognostic factors in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia receiving cefoperazone/sulbactam treatment.

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae are common and result in high mortality rates. In vitro studies demonstrated the potency of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) against Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, the clinical efficacy of CPZ/SUL for the treatment of K. pneumoniae bacteremia has not been studied. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to associate the clinical outcomes of patients with bacteremia with the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CPZ/SUL against the causative K. pneumoniae isolates. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in Taiwan between July 2017 and April 2021. Patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia treated with CPZ/SUL were enrolled in this study. CPZ/SUL MICs were determined using the agar dilution method. Data on the patients' clinical outcomes and characteristics were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 201 patients were enrolled. Among the causative K. pneumoniae isolates, 180 (89.5%) were susceptible to CPZ/SUL. Most patients (n = 156, 77.6%) had favorable outcomes. The 30-day mortality rate was 11.9% (n = 24). Multivariate risk analyses showed that higher APACHE II score (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.14; Confidence Interval [CI], 1.07-1.21; p < 0.001), metastatic tumors (OR, 5.76; CI, 2.31-14.40; p < 0.001), and causative K. pneumoniae CPZ/SUL MICs > 16 µg/ml (OR, 4.30; CI, 1.50-12.27; p = 0.006) were independently associated with unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with K. pneumoniae bacteremia treated with CPZ/SUL at a ratio 1:1 had favorable outcomes when the CPZ/SUL MICs were ≤ 16 µg/ml. Patients with higher APACHE II scores and metastatic tumors had unfavorable outcomes.

Ampicillin-Sulbactam for Carbapenem-Susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia: A Case for High-Dose, Continuous Infusion Dosing Strategy in the Trauma ICU.

Background: The optimal ampicillin-sulbactam dosing regimen for carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in critically ill trauma patients has not been clearly defined. One strategy to provide the adequate sulbactam dose includes high-dose continuous infusion. Case(s) Description: We present three cases of critically ill trauma patients with augmented renal clearance treated with high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam through an intravenous continuous infusion for ventilator-associated pneumonia. All A. baumannii isolates were susceptible to sulbactam with low minimum inhibitory concentrations. All achieved clinical cure at the end of therapy and no recurrent pneumonia was noted. No clinically substantial adverse effect attributable to ampicillin-sulbactam therapy occurred. Discussion: There is limited evidence to endorse high-dose, continuous infusion ampicillin-sulbactam for treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii. This report presents three critically ill trauma patients with augmented renal clearance that achieved positive clinical outcomes with higher doses of ampicillin-sulbactam administered through a continuous infusion.

Antibiotic Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections in View of the Newly Developed ß-Lactams: A Narrative Review of the Existing Evidence.

It is estimated that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is responsible for nearly 5 million human deaths worldwide each year and will reach 10 million by 2050. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections represent the fourth-leading cause of death attributable to antimicrobial resistance globally, but a standardized therapy is still lacking. Among the antibiotics under consideration, Sulbactam/durlobactam seems to be the best candidate to replace current back-bone agents. Cefiderocol could play a pivotal role within combination therapy regimens. Due to toxicity and the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) limitations, colistin (or polymyxin B) should be used as an alternative agent (when no other options are available). Tigecycline (or minocycline) and fosfomycin could represent suitable partners for both NBLs. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are needed to better evaluate the role of NBLs in CRAB infection treatment and to compare the efficacy of tigecycline and fosfomycin as partner antibiotics. Synergism should be tested between NBLs and "old" drugs (rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Huge efforts should be made to accelerate pre-clinical and clinical studies on safer polymyxin candidates with improved lung activity, as well as on the iv rifabutin formulation. In this narrative review, we focused the antibiotic treatment of CRAB infections in view of newly developed ß-lactam agents (NBLs).

Role of the gut microbiota in cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy in mice with chronic renal failure.

OBJECTIVES: The mechanism of cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is not yet clear. We hypothesized that cefoperazone/sulbactam-induced epilepsy could be based on two main factors: neurotoxicity caused by drug accumulation after renal failure and an abnormal gut microbiota (GM). METHODS: A chronic renal failure (CRF) model in mice was established, and then different doses of cefoperazone/sulbactam were injected to induce epilepsy in mice. Normal mouse feces for fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) were collected. We observed the changes in feces, mental state, and activity of each group of mice. After killing, we collected kidneys and colon for H&E staining. We collected mouse feces for the 16S RNA sequencing of bacteria. RESULTS: All CRF mice injected with different concentrations of cefoperazone/sulbactam experienced grade-V seizures and eventually died, whereas normal control mice did not. However, after FMT intervention, the time of epilepsy onset and death in mice was delayed. Early FMT intervention resulted in more mice surviving (p = .0359). Moreover, the villi in the mucosal of group-CS layer fell off, goblet cells missed, and crypts disappeared. The mucosal layer and submucosa were clearly separated. The morphology of intestinal tissue of the CFS and FS group was improved. After FMT, the changes of the GM were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The GM may be involved in the epilepsy induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam in CRF mice. FMT can delay the onset of epilepsy in CRF mice induced by cefoperazone/sulbactam, and the earlier the intervention, the better the effect.

Treatment-emergent cefiderocol resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is associated with insertion sequence ISAba36 in the siderophore receptor pirA.

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance in a blaOXA-72 carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolate from a sacral decubitus ulcer. Cefiderocol was initially used; however, a newly approved sulbactam-durlobactam therapy with source control and flap coverage was successful in treating the infection. Laboratory investigation revealed cefiderocol resistance mediated by ISAba36 insertion into the siderophore receptor pirA.

Friends or foes? Novel antimicrobials tackling MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review.

Gram-negative bacteria have been one of the most studied classes in the field of microbiology, especially in the context of globally alarming antimicrobial resistance levels to these pathogens over the course of the past decades. With high numbers of these microorganisms being described as multidrug-resistant (MDR), or even extended-drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria, specialists in the field have been struggling to keep up with higher prevalence of difficult-to-treat infections caused by such superbugs. The FDA approval of novel antimicrobials, such as cefiderocol (FDC), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA), imipenem/relebactam (IMR), sulbactam/durlobactam (SUL-DUR) and phase 3 clinical trials' results of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) has proven that, while all these substances provide encouraging efficacy rates, antibiotic resistance keeps up with the pace of drug development. Microorganisms have developed more extensive mechanisms of resistance in order to target the threat posed by these novel antimicrobials, thus equiring researchers to be on a constant lookout for other potential drug candidates and molecule development. However, these strategies require a proper understanding of bacterial resistance mechanisms to gain a comprehensive outlook on the issue. The present review aims to highlight these six antibiotic agents, which have brought hope to clinicians during the past decade, discussing general properties of these substances, as well as mechanisms and patterns of resistance, while also providing a short overview on further directions in the field. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, Identifier CRD42024505832.

A Comprehensive Study to Determine the Residual Elimination Pattern of Major Metabolites of Amoxicillin-Sulbactam Hybrid Molecules in Rats by UPLC-MS/MS.

Amoxicillin and sulbactam are widely used in animal food compounding. Amoxicillin-sulbactam hybrid molecules are bicester compounds made by linking amoxicillin and sulbactam with methylene groups and have good application prospects. However, the residual elimination pattern of these hybrid molecules in animals needs to be explored. In the present study, the amoxicillin-sulbactam hybrid molecule (AS group) and a mixture of amoxicillin and sulbactam (mixture group) were administered to rats by gavage, and the levels of the major metabolites of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, amoxicillin diketopiperazine, and sulbactam were determined by UPLC-MS/MS. The residue elimination patterns of the major metabolites in the liver, kidney, urine, and feces of rats in the AS group and the mixture group were compared. The results showed that the total amount of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, amoxicillin diketopiperazine, and the highest concentration of sulbactam in the liver and kidney samples of the AS group and the mixture group appeared at 1 h after drug withdrawal. Between 1 h and 12 h post discontinuation, the total amount of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, and amoxicillin diketopiperazine in the two tissues decreased rapidly, and the elimination half-life of the AS group was significantly higher than that in the mixture group (p < 0.05); the residual amount of sulbactam also decreased rapidly, and the elimination half-life was not significantly different (p > 0.05). In 72 h urine samples, the total excretion rates were 60.61 ± 2.13% and 62.62 ± 1.73% in the AS group and mixture group, respectively. The total excretion rates of fecal samples (at 72 h) for the AS group and mixture group were 9.54 ± 0.26% and 10.60 ± 0.24%, respectively. These results showed that the total quantity of amoxicillin, amoxicilloic acid, and amoxicillin diketopiperazine was eliminated more slowly in the liver and kidney of the AS group than those of the mixture group and that the excretion rate through urine and feces was essentially the same for both groups. The residual elimination pattern of the hybrid molecule in rats determined in this study provides a theoretical basis for the in-depth development and application of hybrid molecules, as well as guidelines for the development of similar drugs.

Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin and Combinations of Cephalosporins with ß-Lactamase Inhibitors as an Advancement in Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

In an era of increasing antibiotic resistance among pathogens, the treatment options for infectious diseases are diminishing. One of the clinical groups especially vulnerable to this threat are patients who are hospitalized in intensive care units due to ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. In order to prevent the exhaustion of therapeutic options for this life-threatening condition, there is an urgent need for new pharmaceuticals. Novel ß-lactam antibiotics, including combinations of cephalosporins with ß-lactamase inhibitors, are proposed as a solution to this escalating problem. The unique mechanism of action, distinctive to this new group of siderophore cephalosporins, can overcome multidrug resistance, which is raising high expectations. In this review, we present the summarized results of clinical trials, in vitro studies, and case studies on the therapeutic efficacy of cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, and cefiderocol in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. We demonstrate that treatment strategies based on siderophore cephalosporins and combinations of ß-lactams with ß-lactamases inhibitors show comparable or higher clinical efficacy than those used with classic pharmaceuticals, like carbapenems, colistin, or tigecycline, and are often associated with a lower risk of adverse events.

Case report: Successful treatment of OXA-23 Acinetobacter baumannii neurosurgical infection and meningitis with sulbactam-durlobactam combination therapy.

Meningitis caused by Acinetobacter species is a rare complication of neurosurgical procedures, although it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter is particularly difficult to treat, considering the limited selection and tolerability of effective antimicrobials. Sulbactam-durlobactam was approved by the FDA in 2023 for treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia due to susceptible strains of Acinetobacter, including carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Here, we present a case of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii neurosurgical infection and meningitis successfully treated with sulbactam-durlobactam combination therapy.

In vitro antibacterial activity of sulbactam-durlobactam in combination with other antimicrobial agents against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex.

Combinations of the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam and seventeen antimicrobial agents were tested against strains of Acinetobacter baumannii in checkerboard assays. Most combinations resulted in indifference with no instances of antagonism. These results suggest sulbactam-durlobactam antibacterial activity against A. baumannii is unlikely to be affected if co-dosed with other antimicrobial agents.

Characterization of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates and microbiological outcome for patients treated with sulbactam-durlobactam in a phase 3 trial (ATTACK).

Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) causes severe, difficult-to-treat infections that are frequently antibiotic resistant. Sulbactam-durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a targeted ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic designed to treat ABC infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant strains. In a global, pathogen-specific, randomized, controlled phase 3 trial (ATTACK), the efficacy and safety of SUL-DUR were compared to colistin, both dosed with imipenem-cilastatin as background therapy, in patients with serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant ABC. Results from ATTACK showed that SUL-DUR met the criteria for non-inferiority to colistin for the primary efficacy endpoint of 28-day all-cause mortality with improved clinical and microbiological outcomes compared to colistin. This report describes the characterization of the baseline ABC isolates from patients enrolled in ATTACK, including an analysis of the correlation of microbiological outcomes with SUL-DUR MIC values and the molecular drivers of SUL-DUR resistance.

Efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam versus branded cefoperazone/sulbactam in the treatment of bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aim to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of generic cefoperazone/sulbactam compared to the branded cefoperazone/sulbactam (Sulperazon) in treating bacterial infections through a meta-analysis. Searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP databases, and Clinical Trials database, resulting in the inclusion of 11 studies comprising 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs). Meta-analysis of the RCTs indicated no statistical differences in clinical success rates, clinical cure rates, microbiological eradication rates, and incidence of adverse reactions between the generic cefoperazone/sulbactam and the branded version. Findings from the RCSs aligned with those from the RCTs, demonstrating that generic versions of cefoperazone/sulbactam are equivalent in efficacy and safety to their branded counterparts in treating bacterial infections.

Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Monomicrobial vs Polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Infections Treated With Sulbactam-Durlobactam or Colistin: A Subset Analysis From a Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Background: In a previous study, the efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam vs colistin for the treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (CRABC) infections were evaluated in a randomized controlled phase 3 trial. Both arms were dosed on a background of imipenem-cilastatin to treat coinfecting gram-negative pathogens. Thirty-six percent of infections in the primary efficacy population were polymicrobial. Methods: A subset analysis was performed to compare clinical and microbiological outcomes at test of cure (7 ± 2 days after the last dose) for patients with monomicrobial and polymicrobial CRABC infections. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics against baseline isolates were determined by broth microdilution according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology. Results: Clinical cure, 28-day all-cause mortality, and microbiological outcomes were similar for patients in the sulbactam-durlobactam treatment arm with monomicrobial or polymicrobial A baumannii-calcoaceticus infections. Patients in the colistin arm with monomicrobial CRABC infections had higher mortality rates with worse clinical and microbiological outcomes as compared with those with polymicrobial infections. For patients who received sulbactam-durlobactam, imipenem susceptibility of coinfecting gram-negative pathogens trended with clinical benefit for patients with polymicrobial A baumannii-calcoaceticus infections. When tested in vitro, durlobactam restored imipenem susceptibility to the majority of coinfecting gram-negative pathogens from the sulbactam-durlobactam arm. This phenotype appeared to be related to the clinical outcome in 13 of 15 evaluable cases. Conclusions: These results suggest that the use of sulbactam-durlobactam plus a carbapenem could be an effective approach to treat polymicrobial infections that include CRABC, but additional clinical data are needed to demonstrate efficacy.

Analysis and monitoring of drug therapy in a patient with peptic ulcer complicated by infection: A case report.

BACKGROUND: The role of primary-level medical pharmacists in medical institutions in China is limited; therefore, it is necessary to explore the role of pharmacists in the process of drug treatment. CASE SUMMARY: A Chinese pharmacist participated in the complete treatment of a patient with a duodenal ulcer. The rationale for drug treatment was evaluated, and adjustments were made to the antacid and anti-infective regimen, as well as the dose and frequency of administration. Body temperature, routine blood examination, and adverse drug reactions were strictly monitored. During treatment, the pharmacist recommended anti-infective therapy with ampicillin-sulbactam, which effectively controlled the infection. Additionally, the pharmacist suggested changing famotidine to lansoprazole for acid suppression and gastroprotective treatment, combined with Chinese patent medicine such as Kangfuxin Liquid. This is the first case report of a pharmacist in primary-level medical institutions adjusting drug use for patients with duodenal ulcer and pulmonary infection. CONCLUSION: A pharmacist participated in the treatment process, provided individualized medication adjustment, and achieved good clinical results.

NMR insights into ß-Lactamase activity of UVI31+ Protein from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

ß-Lactamases (EC 3.5.2.6) confer resistance against ß-lactam group-containing antibiotics in bacteria and higher eukaryotes, including humans. Pathogenic bacterial resistance against ß-lactam antibiotics is a primary concern for potential therapeutic developments and drug targets. Here, we report putative ß-lactamase activity, sulbactam binding (a ß-lactam analogue) in the low µM affinity range, and site-specific interaction studies of a 14 kDa UV- and dark-inducible protein (abbreviated as UVI31+, a BolA homologue) from Chlamydomonas reinhartii. Intriguingly, the solution NMR structure of UVI31 + bears no resemblance to other known ß-lactamases; however, the sulbactam binding is found at two sites rich in positively charged residues, mainly at the L2 loop regions and the N-terminus. Using NMR spectroscopy, ITC and MD simulations, we map the ligand binding sites in UVI31 + providing atomic-level insights into its ß-lactamase activity. Current study is the first report on ß-lactamase activity of UVI31+, a BolA analogue, from C. reinhartii. Furthermore, our mutation studies reveal that the active site serine-55 is crucial for ß-lactamase activity.

Evolution, control and success of combination therapy with Ampicilin-sulbactam/Ceftazidime-Avibactam during a Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii outbreak in burn Intensive Care Unit.

We present our findings on interpatient transmission, epidemic control measures, and the outcomes of a series of ten critically ill burn patients who were either colonized or infected with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). None of the five infected patients achieved clinical cure, and all experienced relapses. Microbiological failure was observed in 40% of the infected patients. The isolated CRAB strains were found to carry blaOXA-23 and armA resistance genes. Despite the lack of clinical cure, all five infected patients survived and were discharged from the Burn Intensive Care Unit.

Sulbactam-durlobactam: a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination targeting Acinetobacter baumannii.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) in patients 18 years of age and older. Sulbactam is a penicillin derivative with antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter but is prone to hydrolysis by ß-lactamases encoded by contemporary isolates. Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler classes A, C and D serine ß-lactamases that restores sulbactam activity both in vitro and in vivo against multidrug-resistant ABC. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections, which can have high rates of mortality.

Sulbactam­durlobactam: a drug for treating lung infectionsAcinetobacter is a type of bacteria. One type, called CRAB, causes serious infections and can be fatal. CRAB is very hard to treat because most drugs no longer work. Sulbactam­durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a drug that can kill CRAB. The US FDA approved SUL-DUR in May of 2023 for treating lung infections (pneumonia) caused by CRAB. This article explains how SUL-DUR works. Use of SUL-DUR and other drugs to treat these types of infections are discussed. In conclusion, SUL-DUR is a promising therapy for serious infections caused by CRAB.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against European Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including isolates resistant to meropenem and recent ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. represent major threats and have few approved therapeutic options. Non-|fermenting Gram-negative isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in 6 European countries between 01 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 and underwent susceptibility testing against cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L), cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-resistant isolates were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,451 (950 P. aeruginosa; 501 Acinetobacter spp.) isolates were collected, commonly from the respiratory tract (42.0% and 39.3%, respectively). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than |ß|-|l|a|c|t|a|m|/|ß|-|l|a|c|t|a|mase| inhibitor combinations against P. aeruginosa (98.9% vs 83.3%-91.4%), and P. |aeruginosa resistant to meropenem (n = 139; 97.8% vs 12.2%-59.7%), ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations (93.6%-98.1% vs 10.7%-71.8%), and both meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam (96.7% vs 5.0%-||45.0%) or |ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.4% vs 8.1%-54.8%), respectively. Cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibilities were high against Acinetobacter spp. (92.4% and 97.0%) and meropenem-resistant Acineto|bacter |spp. (n = 227; 85.0% and 93.8%) but lower against sulbactam-durlobactam- (n |= 15; 13.3%) and cefiderocol- (n = 38; 65.8%) resistant isolates, respectively. Among meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., the most common ß-||lactamase genes were metallo-ß-lactamases [30/139; blaVIM-2 (15/139)] and oxacillinases [215/227; blaOXA-23 (194/227)], respectively. Acquired ß-lactamase genes were identified in 1/10 and 32/38 of cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., and pirA-like or piuA mutations in 10/10 and 37/38, respectively. Conclusion: cefiderocol susceptibility was high against P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem-resistant isolates and those resistant to recent ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations common in first-line treatment of European non-fermenters. IMPORTANCE: This was the first study in which the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and non-licensed ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem- and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. A notably large number of European isolates were collected. Meropenem resistance was defined according to the MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem, ensuring that data reflect antibiotic activity against isolates that would remain meropenem resistant in the clinic. Cefiderocol susceptibility was high against non-fermenters, and there was no apparent cross resistance between cefiderocol and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations, with the exception of sulbactam-durlobactam. These results provide insights into therapeutic options for infections due to resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. and indicate how early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow clinicians to choose the effective treatment(s) from all available options. This is particularly important as current treatment options against non-fermenters are limited.