Effectiveness of postoperative superficial radiotherapy following the keloid-cross-flap surgery for auricular keloid: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retaining partial keloid skin to make cross flaps (keloid-cross-flap surgery) is a modification of the core excision. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of superficial radiotherapy versus compression therapy after keloid-cross-flap surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, auricular keloid patients were consecutively screened from January 2019 to December 2021. They underwent keloid-cross-flap surgery and then enter either the superficial radiotherapy or the compression treatment group. The primary outcome was the one-year keloid recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included: non-completion rate of adjuvant treatment; Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores and auricular aesthetics scores, evaluated by a four-point Likert scale (1 = poor to 4 = excellent) of non-recurring patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to eliminate potential confounding factors. RESULTS: 123 patients were included in the superficial radiotherapy group and 128 in the compression treatment group. Non-completion rate was significantly higher in the compression treatment group (17.97 %), while the loss rate was comparable between the two groups. Overall, 13 patients (13.54 %) relapsed in superficial radiotherapy group, while 22 patients (25.58 %) in compression group (p < 0.05). After PSM, 59 patients in each group were analyzed, and the recurrence rate was lower in the superficial radiotherapy group (13.56 %). Of relapse-free patients, no significant difference was found in PSAS scores, OSAS scores or aesthetic scores between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Keloid-cross-flap surgery could provide favorable morphologic repair of the auricular keloid, and postoperative superficial radiotherapy shows higher compliance and lower recurrence rate comparing to compression treatment.

Successful treatment of Giant keloid on the right toes using trepanation combined with superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100): a case report with literature review.

In dermatology, a keloid is one of the most common skin morphological abnormalities caused by excessive proliferation of fibroblasts. Keloids that are large or occur near important joint sites often cause varying degrees of physiological dysfunction in patients, therefore requiring medical treatment. A boy with congenital syndactyly developed huge keloids at the surgical site after undergoing surgical correction treatment. After treatment using trepanation combined with superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) in our hospital, most of the boy's keloids shrank and flattened. The affected foot returned to its normal appearance, and the boy could wear shoes normally. The boy did not complain of pain, numbness, or any other distinctive discomfort after completing the treatment. This suggested that the combination of trepanation and SRT-100 may be one of the options for treating hypertrophic keloids that cannot be treated by surgical excision.

Superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) for refractory plantar warts: An alternative noninvasive treatment strategy.

BACKGROUND: Verrucas that occur on the soles of the feet are called plantar warts, most of which can recur repeatedly and are difficult to eradicate. Hypertrophic and refractory plantar warts are often accompanied by pain and discomfort, which cause many inconveniences in patients' daily lives. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the therapeutic effect of superficial radiotherapy (SRT-100) on refractory plantar warts and further create favorable conditions for the subsequent treatment of this disease with a high recurrence rate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for refractory plantar warts treated with superficial radiotherapy in our outpatient department from January to June 2023. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were included in our study (median age, 33 years). The female-to-male ratio was 1:3.29. Two to six months after radiotherapy, all of the warts subsided in 23 (76.67%) patients, most of the warts subsided in 4 (13.33%) patients, 3 (10%) patients did not respond to treatment, and 7 (23.33%) patients had recurrent or new warts after their warts subsided. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with refractory plantar warts improved after superficial radiotherapy. Our study presented that men are more susceptible to plantar warts than women, and young and middle-aged people are the main population affected by the disease. Superficial radiotherapy is an effective treatment for refractory plantar warts, which can quickly remove the warts in a short period. It is safe and noninvasive, with minimal adverse reactions. Some patients relapse after the lesion is clear, and superficial radiotherapy can create favorable conditions for the subsequent treatment of viral warts in clinical practice.

Clinical-epidemiological characterization of patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated with superficial radiotherapy / Caracterización clínica-epidemiológica de pacientes con cáncer de piel no melanoma tratados con radioterapia superficial / Caracterização clínico-epidemiológica de pacientes com câncer de pele não melanoma tratados com radioterapia superficial

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma collectively called non-melanoma skin cancer, are the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Objective: To identify the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with non-melanoma skin cancer treated with superficial radiotherapy. Methods: A descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study was carried out at the "Conrado Benítez García" Cancer Hospital in Santiago de Cuba in the period from October 2018 to January 2021. The universe consisted of all patients (n=147). with non-melanoma skin cancer with confirmed clinical and histological diagnosis and treated with superficial radiotherapy, older than 31 years and up to 95 years of age. The data collected from the medical records were entered into a database in the statistical program SPSS version 25 for Windows, the descriptive statistics of frequency distribution and absolute numbers were used. Results: according to age groups, the most affected was 75 - 85 years, the male sex, white skin color, urban origin and the largest number of affected patients belonged to the retired sector. Most of the patients received surgical treatment prior to radiant treatment, and the most used treatment scheme was D (320 cGy/ 17 frac / 2 times a week. Conclusions: Histological type squamous cell carcinoma had the highest incidence, as well as head and neck location was the most frequent.

Introducción: El carcinoma basocelular y el carcinoma espinocelular denominados en conjunto, cáncer de piel no melanoma, son los tumores malignos más comunes a nivel mundial. Objetivo: Identificar las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con cáncer de piel no melanoma tratados con radioterapia superficial. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, longitudinal y retrospectivo en el Hospital Oncológico "Conrado Benítez García" de Santiago de Cuba en el periodo comprendido de octubre de 2018 a enero de 2021. El universo estuvo constituido por todos los pacientes (n=147) con cáncer de piel no melanoma con diagnóstico clínico e histológico confirmado y tratados con radioterapia superficial, mayores de 31 años y hasta 95 años de edad. Los datos recogidos de las historias clínicas, fueron vaciados en una base de datos en el programa estadístico SPSS versión 25 para Windows, se utilizó la estadística descriptiva distribución de frecuencias y números absolutos. Resultados: según grupos de edades el más afectado fue 75 ­ 85 años, el sexo masculino, el color de la piel blanca, la procedencia urbana y el mayor número de pacientes afectados perteneció al sector jubilado. La mayoría de los pacientes recibieron tratamiento quirúrgico previo al tratamiento radiante, siendo el esquema de tratamiento más usado fue el D (320 cGy/ 17 frac / 2 veces a la semana Conclusiones: El carcinoma epidermoide tipo histológico fue el de mayor incidencia, así como la localización de cabeza y cuello fue la más frecuente.

Introdução: O carcinoma basocelular e o carcinoma espinocelular, chamados coletivamente de câncer de pele não melanoma, são os tumores malignos mais comuns em todo o mundo. Objetivo: Identificar as características clínicas e epidemiológicas de pacientes com câncer de pele não melanoma tratados com radioterapia superficial. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo descritivo, longitudinal e retrospectivo no Hospital de Câncer "Conrado Benítez García" de Santiago de Cuba no período de outubro de 2018 a janeiro de 2021. O universo foi constituído por todos os pacientes (n=147). câncer de pele melanoma com diagnóstico clínico e histológico confirmado e tratados com radioterapia superficial, maiores de 31 anos e até 95 anos de idade. Os dados coletados dos prontuários foram inseridos em um banco de dados no programa estatístico SPSS versão 25 para Windows, foi utilizada a estatística descritiva de distribuição de frequência e números absolutos. Resultados: segundo as faixas etárias, a mais acometida foi de 75 a 85 anos, sexo masculino, cor da pele branca, procedência urbana e o maior número de acometidos pertencia ao setor aposentado. A maioria dos pacientes recebeu tratamento cirúrgico antes do tratamento radiante, e o esquema de tratamento mais utilizado foi o D (320 cGy/ 17 frac / 2 vezes por semana). local foi o mais frequente.

Machine characterization and central axis depth dose data of a superficial x-ray radiotherapy unit.

Objectives. The purpose of this study is to present data from the clinical commissioning of an Xstrahl 150 x-ray unit used for superficial radiotherapy,Methods. Commissioning tasks included vendor acceptance tests, timer reproducibility, linearity and end-effect measurements, half-value layer (HVL) measurements, inverse square law verification, head-leakage measurements, and beam output calibration. In addition, percent depth dose (PDD) curves were determined for different combinations of filter/kV settings and applicators. Automated PDD water phantom scans were performed utilizing four contemporary detectors: a microDiamond detector, a microSilicon detector, an EDGE detector, and a PinPoint ionization chamber. The measured PDD data were compared to the published values in BJR Supplement 25,Results. The x-ray unit's mechanical, safety, and radiation characteristics were within vendor-stated specifications. Across sixty commissioned x-ray beams, the PDDs determined in water using solid state detectors were in excellent agreement with the BJR 25 data. For the lower (<100 kVp) and medium-energy (≥100 kVp) superficial beams the average agreement was within [-3.6,+0.4]% and [-3.7,+1.4]% range, respectively. For the high-energy superficial (low-energy orthovoltage) x-rays at 150 kVp, the average difference for the largest 20 × 20 cm2collimator was (-0.7 ± 1.0)%,Conclusions. This study presents machine characterization data collected for clinical use of a superficial x-ray unit. Special focus was placed on utilizing contemporary detectors and techniques for the relative PDD measurements using a motorized water phantom. The results in this study confirm that the aggregate values published in the BJR 25 report still serve as a valid benchmark when comparing data from site-specific measurements, or the reference data for clinical utilization without such measurements,Advances in knowledge. This paper presents comprehensive data from the acceptance and commissioning of a modern kilovoltage superficial x-ray radiotherapy machine. Comparisons between the PDD data measured in this study using different detectors and BJR 25 data are highlighted.

Scar-centered dilation in the treatment of large keloids.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic scars and keloid treatment is a major problem in plastic surgery. While small keloids can be treated with resection followed by radiotherapy, large keloids require treatment with a tissue expander. Conventional methods increase the need for auxiliary incisions, causing new scar hyperplasia. AIM: To introduce a new method for the treatment of keloids with an expander. METHODS: Between 2018 and 2021, we performed surgeries to treat large keloids in nine patients with a two-stage approach. In the first stage, an intrascar incision was made in the keloid, and a customized expander was implanted under the keloid and the surrounding normal skin. A period of 3-6 mo was allowed for skin expansion. In the second stage, after the initial incision healed, a follow-up surgery was performed to remove the expander, resect the keloid, and repair the expanded skin flap. To accomplish this, an incision was made along the scar boundary to avoid making a new surgical incision and creating new scars. Superficial radiotherapy was then performed postoperatively. RESULTS: Two patients had anterior chest keloids. After treatment, the anterior chest incision was broken repeatedly and then sutured again after debridement. It healed smoothly without scar hyperplasia. Keloids were successfully removed in 7 patients without recurrence. CONCLUSION: This method was performed through a keloid incision and with a custom expander embedded. After full expansion, the keloid was directly resected using a linear suture, which avoids new surgical incisions and scars and can successfully remove large-area keloids. The treatment is effective, providing new insights and strategies for the treatment of similar large-area keloid and hypertrophic scar cases in the future.

Off-axis dose distribution with stand-in and stand-off configurations for superficial radiotherapy treatments.

Current practice when delivering dose for superficial skin radiotherapy is to adjust the monitor units so that the prescribed dose is delivered to the central axis of the superficial unit applicator. Variations of source-to-surface distance due to patient's anatomy protruding into the applicator or extending away from the applicator require adjustments to the monitor units using the inverse square law. Off-axis dose distribution varies significantly from the central axis dose and is not currently being quantified. The dose falloff at the periphery of the field is not symmetrical in the anode-cathode axis due to the heel effect. This study was conducted to quantify the variation of dose across the surface being treated and model a simple geometric shape to estimate a patient's surface with stand-in and stand-off. Isodose plots and color-coded dose distribution maps were produced from scans of GAFChromic EBT-3 film irradiated by a Gulmay D3300 orthovoltage x-ray therapy system. It was clear that larger applicators show a greater dose falloff toward the periphery than smaller applicators. Larger applicators were found to have a lower percentage of points above 90% of central axis dose (SA90). Current clinical practice does not take this field variation into account. Stand-in can result in significant dose falloff off-axis depending on the depth and width of the protrusion, while stand-off can result in a flatter field due to the high-dose region near the central axis being further from the source than the peripheral regions. The central axis also received a 7% increased or decreased dose for stand-in or stand-off, respectively.

An evaluation of techniques used in superficial radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer to replicate the planned treatment area: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Accuracy of superficial radiotherapy for non-melanoma skin cancer is dependent on replicating the original clinical mark-up. Responses from 18 UK Radiotherapy centres identified the four most common replication techniques; the accuracy and time-efficiency of each was evaluated, as well as participant preference and confidence. METHODS: A 2.0  cm × 2.5  cm ellipse field was drawn around the nasal ala of a surrogate patient. Templates for each replication method (1-4) were created, and skin marks removed. Twenty-five therapeutic radiographers used each method to replicate the mark-up. Measurements were recorded for lateral and longitudinal displacement, ellipse diameter and time taken. A post-study questionnaire recorded participant preference and perceived confidence. RESULTS: Comparison of the mean ellipse areas for methods 1-4 identified no statistically significant differences (ANOVA test; p = 0.579 to p = 0.999). Lateral and longitudinal displacements for method 1-4 showed a statistically significant difference between method 3 and each of methods 1, 2, 4 for lateral and longitudinal respectively (ANOVA; lateral: p = 0.008, p = 0.002, p = 0.05; longitudinal: p = 0.036, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000). Mean time taken was longest for method 3, and was compared using a Friedman test (p = 0.000) identifying a statistically significant difference. Twenty-two participants completed the questionnaire. 48% favoured method 2, 41% method 4. Method 3 was least favourite. A Likert scale (1-10) measured confidence. Participants had most confidence in methods 2 and 4. CONCLUSION: In this study, method 3 was least accurate, most time consuming, and was least favoured by users. The clinical significance of these results will depend on the margins used in local practise.

Practice and Educational Gaps in Radiation Therapy in Dermatology.

Guidelines for appropriate use of superficial radiation therapy are based on decades of research; although no formal appropriate use criteria have been developed, they are warranted. Superficial radiation in the outpatient dermatologic setting is the least expensive form of radiation treatment. Although higher cure rates may be possible with Mohs surgery, this should never argue against dermatologists retaining and refining a modality, nor should we limit its use by our successors. Most important, our elderly and infirm patients should continue to benefit from superficial radiation therapy in outpatient dermatologic settings.

Novel treatment options for nonmelanoma skin cancer: focus on electronic brachytherapy.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is an increasing health care issue in the United States, significantly affecting quality of life and impacting health care costs. Radiotherapy has a long history in the treatment of NMSC. Shortly after the discovery of X-rays and (226)Radium, physicians cured patients with NMSC using these new treatments. Both X-ray therapy and brachytherapy have evolved over the years, ultimately delivering higher cure rates and lower toxicity. Electronic brachytherapy for NMSC is based on the technical and clinical data obtained from radionuclide skin surface brachytherapy and the small skin surface applicators developed over the past 25 years. The purpose of this review is to introduce electronic brachytherapy in the context of the history, data, and utilization of traditional radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

Radiotherapy treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer.

Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common malignancy in the USA, with an estimated 3.5 million cases per year. Treatment options include surgical excision, radiation therapy (RT), photodynamic therapy and topical agents. Although surgical excision remains the mainstay of therapy, RT offers an effective alternative. RT can be used as an adjunct to surgery in high-risk situations, or in cases where surgical excision would lead to impaired cosmesis and/or functional outcomes. Radiation treatment modalities for non-melanoma skin cancers are diverse. Studies in the literature have examined the clinical effects of a wide variety of modalities, areas of the body and dosages. The most common modalities include superficial or orthovoltage RT, electron beam therapy and high dose-rate brachytherapy. This article aims to review the diverse radiotherapy treatment modalities for non-melanoma skin cancers, focusing on tumor control and toxicity.

Dosimetric characteristics of a new unit for electronic skin brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy with radioactive high dose rate (HDR) (192)Ir source is applied to small skin cancer lesions, using surface applicators, i.e. Leipzig or Valencia type. New developments in the field of radiotherapy for skin cancer include electronic brachytherapy. This technique involves the placement of an HDR X-ray source close to the skin, therefore combining the benefits of brachytherapy with the reduced shielding requirements and targeted energy of low energy X-rays. Recently, the Esteya(®) Electronic Brachytherapy System (Esteya EBS, Elekta AB-Nucletron, Stockholm, Sweden) has been developed specifically for HDR brachytherapy treatment of surface lesions. The system provides radionuclide free HDR brachytherapy by means of a small 69.5 kV X-ray source. The purpose of this study is to obtain the dosimetric characterization required for clinical implementation, providing the detailed methodology to perform the commissioning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Flatness, symmetry and penumbra, percentage of depth dose (PDD), kV stability, HVL, output, spectrum, linearity, and leakage have been evaluated for a set of applicators (from 10 mm to 30 mm in diameter). RESULTS: Flatness and symmetry resulted better than 5% with around 1 mm of penumbra. The depth dose gradient is about 7%/mm. A kV value of 68.4 ± 1.0 kV (k = 1) was obtained, in good agreement with manufacturer data (69.5 kV). HVL was 1.85 mm Al. Dose rate for a typical 6 Gy to 7 Gy prescription resulted about 3.3 Gy/min and the leakage value was < 100 µGy/min. CONCLUSIONS: The new Esteya(®) Electronic Brachytherapy System presents excellent flatness and penumbra as with the Valencia applicator case, combined with an improved PDD, allowing treatment of lesions of up to a depth of 5 mm in combination with reduced treatment duration. The Esteya unit allows HDR brachytherapy superficial treatment within a minimally shielded environment due its low energy.