Estenosis arterial del injerto renal: evaluación de la incidencia mediante ecografía doppler, factores de riesgo y análisis de las complicaciones que pueden afectar a la supervivencia del injerto / Transplant renal artery stenosis: Study of incidence using doppler ultrasound, risk factors and analysis is effect in graft outcomes

Introducción y objetivos La estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal (EAR) es una complicación vascular del trasplante renal cuya incidencia estimada es del 13%, la cual puede causar hipertensión arterial refractaria, disfunción renal y muerte prematura en los receptores. Métodos Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo que incluyó a todos los pacientes sometidos a trasplante renal entre 2014 y 2020. Los pacientes fueron evaluados mediante ecografía doppler renal sistemática tras el trasplante. Para identificar los factores de riesgo independientes de la estenosis de la arteria renal tras el trasplante, realizamos un análisis multivariante. Resultados Se incluyeron 724 trasplantes renales, el 12% eran de donante vivo y el 88% de donante fallecido. La edad media en los receptores era de 54,8 años y en los donantes era de 53. Se diagnosticó estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal en 70 (10%) receptores, la mayoría durante los primeros 6 meses después de la intervención. El 51% de los pacientes con estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal se manejaron de manera conservadora. El análisis multivariante mostró que la diabetes mellitus, el rechazo del injerto, la resutura arterial y el índice de masa corporal del donante eran factores de riesgo independientes de estenosis de la arteria renal después del trasplante. La supervivencia de los injertos con estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal fue del 98% a los 6 meses y del 95% a los 2 años. Conclusiones El uso sistemático de la ecografía doppler en el período inmediatamente posterior al trasplante permitió diagnosticar un 10% de estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal en nuestra cohorte. A pesar de los factores de riesgo mencionados anteriormente, un seguimiento y tratamiento adecuados podrían reducir el riesgo de pérdida del injerto en pacientes con estenosis de la arteria del injerto renal. (AU)

Introduction and objectives Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a vascular complication after kidney transplantation which estimated incidence is 13%. It could cause refractory arterial hypertension, kidney dysfunction and premature death in transplant recipients. Methods We carried out a retrospective study including every patient who underwent renal transplantation between 2014 and 2020. They were evaluated with a systematic post-transplant renal Doppler ultrasound. To identify independent risk factors for transplant renal artery stenosis we performed a multivariate analysis. Results Seven hundred twenty-four kidney transplants were included, 12% were living donors and 88% were deceased donors. The mean age was 54.8 in recipients and 53 in donors. Transplant renal artery stenosis was diagnosed in 70 (10%) recipients, the majority in the first 6 months after surgery. The 51% of patients with transplant renal artery stenosis were managed conservatively. The multivariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus, graft rejection, arterial resuture and donor body mass index as independent risk factors for transplant renal artery stenosis. Survival of the grafts with transplant renal artery stenosis was 98% at 6 months and 95% at two years. Conclusions The systematic performance of Doppler ultrasound in the immediate post-transplant period diagnosed 10% of transplant renal artery stenosis in our cohort. Despite the above risk factors, an adequate monitoring and treatment could avoid the increased risk of graft loss in patients with transplant renal artery stenosis. (AU)

Transplant renal artery stenosis: Study of incidence using doppler ultrasound, risk factors and analysis is effect in graft outcomes.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a vascular complication after kidney transplantation which estimated incidence is 13%. It could cause refractory arterial hypertension, kidney dysfunction and premature death in transplant recipients. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study including every patient who underwent renal transplantation between 2014 and 2020. They were evaluated with a systematic post-transplant renal Doppler ultrasound. To identify independent risk factors for transplant renal artery stenosis we performed a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-four kidney transplants were included, 12% ​​were living donors and 88% were deceased donors. The mean age was 54.8 in recipients and 53 in donors. Transplant renal artery stenosis was diagnosed in 70 (10%) recipients, the majority in the first 6 months after surgery. 51% of patients with transplant renal artery stenosis were managed conservatively. The multivariate analysis showed diabetes mellitus, graft rejection, arterial resuture and donor body mass index as independent risk factors for transplant renal artery stenosis. Survival of the grafts with transplant renal artery stenosis was 98% at 6 months and 95% at two years. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic performance of Doppler ultrasound in the immediate post-transplant period diagnosed 10% of transplant renal artery stenosis in our cohort. Despite the above risk factors, an adequate monitoring and treatment could avoid the increased risk of graft loss in patients with transplant renal artery stenosis.

Supervivencia de injerto graso en la lipotransferencia glútea / Survival of fat graft in gluteal lipotransfer

Introducción: El aumento de glúteos tiene como objetivo lograr una apariencia y contorno más joven; así como crear la proporción ideal entre cintura y cadera. Esto se puede lograr mediante la lipoinyección, aunque en este caso existen controversias en cuanto a la viabilidad del tejido injertado y la supervivencia de la grasa. Objetivo: Determinar el porcentaje de supervivencia del injerto de grasa autóloga y su relación con el volumen inyectado en pacientes sometidas a lipotransferencia glútea. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte longitudinal y prospectivo con una muestra de 44 pacientes sometidas a lipotransferencia glútea en el Servicio de Cirugía Plástica del Hospital Docente Clínico Quirúrgico Dr. Miguel Enríquez en el período comprendido entre marzo de 2018 y junio de 2021. Resultados: El estudio evidencia que, mediante ultrasonido y fórmulas, el volumen promedio y la altura de la de grasa en los glúteos se duplica en el posoperatorio mediato y disminuye en el posoperatorio tardío sin llegar a los valores del preoperatorio. Además, se estableció que cerca de la media del volumen de grasa autóloga injertada en los glúteos sobrevive de manera definitiva en el posoperatorio tardío. Además, quedó establecido que la relación entre el volumen infiltrado y la supervivencia del injerto de grasa autóloga es inversamente proporcional: mientras mayor es el volumen, menor es su supervivencia. Conclusiones: Solo la mitad del volumen de grasa autóloga injertada en los glúteos sobrevive de manera definitiva, y la supervivencia de la grasa es inversamente proporcional al volumen infiltrado(AU)

Introduction: Buttock augmentation aims to achieve a more youthful appearance and contour; as well as creating the ideal proportion between waist and hips. This can be achieved by lipoinjection, although in this case there are controversies regarding the viability of the injected tissue and the survival of the fat. Objective: To determine the percentage of autologous fat graft survival and its relationship with the injected volume in patients undergoing gluteal fat transfer. Methods: An observational, descriptive, longitudinal and prospective study was carried out, with a sample of 44 patients undergoing gluteal lipotransfer, in the plastic surgery service of the Dr. Miguel Enriquez Clinical Surgical Teaching Hospital, in the intermediate period between March 2018 to June 2021. Results: The study shows that through ultrasound and formulas, the average volume and height of fat in the buttocks doubles in the immediate postoperative period, decreasing in the late postoperative period, without reaching preoperative values. Furthermore, it's established that about the mean volume of autologous fat grafted to the buttocks survives definitively in the late postoperative period. In addition, it was established that the relationship between the infiltrated volume and the survival of the autologous fat graft is inversely proportional, the greater the volume, the less its survival. Conclusions: Only half of the volume of autologous fat injected into the buttocks survives definitively, and the survival of the fat is inversely proportional to the volume injected(AU)

Evolution of kidney allograft loss causes over 40 years (1979-2019).

INTRODUCTION: The improvement of kidney allograft recipient and graft survival showed a decrease over the last 40 years. Long-term graft loss rate remained stable during a 25-year time span. Knowing the changing causes and the risk factors associated with graft loss requires special attention. The present study aimed to assess the causes of graft loss and kidney allograft recipient death. Also, we aimed to compare two different periods (1979-1999 and 2000-2019) to identify changes in the characteristics of the failed allografts and recipient and donors profile. METHODS AND PATIENTS: We performed a single-center cohort study. We included all the kidney transplant recipients at the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) between May 1979 and December 2019. Graft loss was defined as recipient death with functioning graft and as loss of graft function (return to dialysis or retransplantation). We assessed the causes of graft loss using clinical and histological information. We also analyzed the results of the two different transplant periods (1979-1999 and 2000-2019). RESULTS: Between 1979 and 2019, 1522 transplants were performed. The median follow-up time was 56 (IQR 8-123) months. During follow-up, 722 (47.5%) grafts were lost: 483 (66.9%) due to graft failure and 239 (33.1%) due to death with functioning graft. The main causes of death were cardiovascular (25.1%), neoplasms (25.1%), and infectious diseases (21.8%). These causes were stable between the two periods of time. Only the unknown cause of death has decreased in the last period. The main cause of graft failure (loss of graft function) was the allograft chronic dysfunction (75%). When histologic information was available, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) were the most frequent specific causes (15.9% and 12.6%). Of the graft failures, 213 (29.5%) were early (<1 year of transplantation). Vascular thrombosis was the main cause of early graft failure in the second period (2000-2019) (46.7%) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) was the main cause (31.3%) in the first period (1979-1999). The causes of late graft loss were similar between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of kidney allograft recipient death are still due to cardiovascular and malignant diseases. Vascular thrombosis has emerged as a frequent cause of early graft loss in the most recent years. The evaluation of the causes of graft loss is necessary to improve kidney transplantation outcomes.

Evolución de las causas de pérdida del injerto en trasplante renal durante 40 años (1979-2019) / Evolution of kidney allograft loss causes over 40 years (1979-2019)

Introducción: La mejoría en la supervivencia del receptor y del injerto renal sufre un proceso de deceleración. La tasa de pérdida del injerto a medio y largo plazo permanece estable desde hace 25 años. Es fundamental conocer las causas de pérdida del injerto y los factores relacionados, así como identificar si se han producido cambios en las causas de pérdida del injerto en los últimos años. El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar las causas de pérdida del injerto según fallecimiento del receptor o pérdida del injerto con vuelta a diálisis/retrasplante, y analizar las causas específicas de pérdida del injerto en 2 épocas (1979-1999 y 2000-2019) para identificar cambios en el perfil de los injertos perdidos. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de todos los trasplantes renales (TR) realizados en el Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) entre mayo-1979 y diciembre-2019. Consideramos pérdida del injerto el fallecimiento del paciente con injerto funcionante o el re-inicio de diálisis o retrasplante. Revisamos las causas de pérdida mediante información clínica e histológica, y analizamos los resultados en 2 periodos (1979-1999 y 2000-2019). (AU)

Introduction: The improvement of kidney allograft recipient and graft survival showed a decrease over the last 40 years. Long-term graft loss rate remained stable during a 25-year time span. Knowing the changing causes and the risk factors associated with graft loss requires special attention. The present study aimed to assess the causes of graft loss and kidney allograft recipient death. Also, we aimed to compare two different periods (1979-1999 and 2000-2019) to identify changes in the characteristics of the failed allografts and recipient and donors profile. Methods and patients: We performed a single-center cohort study. We included all the kidney transplant recipients at the Hospital del Mar (Barcelona) between May 1979 and December 2019. Graft loss was defined as recipient death with functioning graft and as loss of graft function (return to dialysis or retransplantation). We assessed the causes of graft loss using clinical and histological information. We also analyzed the results of the two different transplant periods (1979-1999 and 2000-2019). (AU)

Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study / Supervivencia del paciente y del injerto en receptores de trasplante de páncreas: estudio EFISPAN

Introduction and objectives: Graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation have improved in recent decades, but data are mainly derived from registries or prospective single-centre studies. This large epidemiological study was undertaken to investigate the impact of clinical and demographic factors on graft and patient survival in pancreas transplant recipients in Spain, and to provide robust, country-wide, practice-based data to complement registry findings. Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological study to assess risk factors impacting patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients in eight centres in Spain. All patients transplanted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 were included; data were collected until 31 December 2015. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for all time-to-event analyses, including patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, and BPAR. For graft survival analysis, in cases of death with functioning graft, patients were censored without any event on the date of death. For acute rejection and BPAR, patients were censored without any event on the date of death or graft loss. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were conducted to assess the association between baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and patient/graft survival. (AU)

Introducción y objetivos: Los resultados del injerto en el trasplante de páncreas han mejorado en las últimas décadas, pero los datos provienen principalmente de registros o estudios prospectivos unicéntricos. Este estudio epidemiológico se llevó a cabo para investigar el impacto de los factores clínicos y demográficos en la supervivencia del injerto y del paciente en receptores de trasplante de páncreas en España, y proporcionar datos sólidos, basados en la práctica a nivel nacional, para complementar los hallazgos de los registros. Pacientes y métodos: Realizamos un estudio epidemiológico longitudinal, retrospectivo, para evaluar los factores de riesgo que influyen en la supervivencia del paciente y del injerto en receptores de trasplante de páncreas en 8 centros de España. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes trasplantados entre el 1 de enero de 2008 y el 31 de diciembre de 2012; los datos se recogieron hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2015. Se utilizó el método de Kaplan-Meier para todos los análisis del tiempo transcurrido hasta el evento, incluida la supervivencia del paciente, la supervivencia del injerto, el rechazo agudo y el BPAR. Para el análisis de la supervivencia del injerto, en los casos de muerte con injerto funcionante, los pacientes fueron censurados sin ningún evento en la fecha de la muerte. Para el rechazo agudo y BPAR, los pacientes fueron censurados sin ningún evento en la fecha de la muerte o pérdida del injerto. Se realizaron análisis univariables y multivariables (modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox) para evaluar la asociación entre las características clínicas y demográficas basales y la supervivencia del paciente/injerto. (AU)

Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation have improved in recent decades, but data are mainly derived from registries or prospective single-centre studies. This large epidemiological study was undertaken to investigate the impact of clinical and demographic factors on graft and patient survival in pancreas transplant recipients in Spain, and to provide robust, country-wide, practice-based data to complement registry findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological study to assess risk factors impacting patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients in eight centres in Spain. All patients transplanted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 were included; data were collected until 31 December 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for all time-to-event analyses, including patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, and BPAR. For graft survival analysis, in cases of death with functioning graft, patients were censored without any event on the date of death. For acute rejection and BPAR, patients were censored without any event on the date of death or graft loss. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were conducted to assess the association between baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and patient/graft survival. RESULTS: Data were included for 241 (80.1%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, 56 (18.6%) pancreas-after-kidney transplants and 4 (1.3%) pancreas transplants alone. Mean±standard deviation time from diagnosis until transplantation was 26.1±7.5 years. Nineteen patients died, mainly due to infections (n=10); the remaining 282 patients (93.7%) survived from transplantation until the end of the study. Among 55 patients (18.3%) with pancreas graft loss, the main reasons were vascular thrombosis (n=19), chronic rejection (n=10), acute rejection (n=6) and death with a functioning graft (n=5). The overall rate of vascular-related death was 1.3% at 5 years post transplant. Univariable analysis showed that patient age and weight, donor age, previous kidney transplantation, previous cardiovascular events and need for insulin more than 48h post transplantation were significantly associated with pancreas graft survival. Of these, in multivariable analyses pancreas graft survival was inferior in patients who had received a previous kidney transplant prior to pancreas transplantation (log-rank test, p=0.0002). Glucose metabolism, renal function and cardiovascular risk factors were generally stable following transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multicentre study highlight the excellent patient and graft outcomes following pancreas transplantation, with a notably low incidence of cardiovascular events.

Impact of infections and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae on graft and patient survival in a kidney transplantation program in Mexico.

INTRODUCTION: Immunosuppressive treatments have improved graft and patient survival rates, but can increase the incidence of post-transplant infections. OBJECTIVES: To analyze data from kidney transplant patients and describe the pathogens responsible for the infections they experience. METHODS: Longitudinal, analytical, observational study of 103 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. The follow-up period was 5.07 ± 1.28 years. RESULTS: Overall mortality rate was 10.68% and graft loss rate was 14.56%. Regarding recipient risk of death, the Cox regression model showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.66 for positive bacterial cultures and 2.22 for positive extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains; as for graft loss, HR was 4.59 in those with positive bacterial cultures and 4.25 in those who were positive for ESBL-producing strains. CONCLUSIONS: Significant death risk was found in kidney transplant recipients with positive bacterial cultures and an increased risk of graft loss in those with positive bacterial cultures and in those who were positive for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates. The rate of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae is high, and stricter strategies are therefore necessary to control the use of antibiotics.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los tratamientos inmunosupresores han mejorado las tasas de supervivencia del injerto y del paciente, pero pueden incrementar las infecciones postrasplante. OBJETIVOS: Analizar los datos de pacientes con trasplante renal y describir las bacterias responsables de las infecciones que presentan. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, longitudinal y analítico de 103 pacientes sometidos a trasplante renal. El periodo de seguimiento fue de 5.07 ± 1.28 años. RESULTADOS: La tasa de mortalidad fue de 10.68 % y la de pérdida del injerto de 14.56 %. Respecto al riesgo de muerte del receptor, el modelo de regresión de Cox mostró un cociente de riesgo (HR, hazard ratio) de 5.66 en los pacientes con cultivo bacteriano positivo y de 2.22 en aquellos con cepas productoras de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE); en cuanto a la pérdida del injerto, el HR fue de 4.59 en quienes tuvieron cultivo bacteriano positivo y de 4.25 en aquellos con cepas productoras de BLEE. CONCLUSIONES: Se encontró riesgo significativo de muerte en receptores de trasplante renal con cultivo bacteriano positivo y mayor riesgo de pérdida del injerto en aquellos con cultivo bacteriano positivo y aislamiento de cepas productoras de BLEE. La tasa de enterobacterias productoras de BLEE es alta, por ello son necesarias estrategias más estrictas para controlar del uso de antibióticos.

Impacto de infecciones y enterobacterias productoras de betalactamasa de espectro extendido en la supervivencia del injerto y del paciente en un programa de trasplante renal en México / Impact of infections and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae on graft and patient survival in a kidney transplantation program in Mexico

Resumen Introducción: Los tratamientos inmunosupresores han mejorado las tasas de supervivencia del injerto y del paciente, pero pueden incrementar las infecciones postrasplante. Objetivos: Analizar los datos de pacientes con trasplante renal y describir las bacterias responsables de las infecciones que presentan. Métodos: Estudio observacional, longitudinal y analítico de 103 pacientes sometidos a trasplante renal. El periodo de seguimiento fue de 5.07 ± 1.28 años. Resultados: La tasa de mortalidad fue de 10.68 % y la de pérdida del injerto de 14.56 %. Respecto al riesgo de muerte del receptor, el modelo de regresión de Cox mostró un cociente de riesgo (HR, hazard ratio) de 5.66 en los pacientes con cultivo bacteriano positivo y de 2.22 en aquellos con cepas productoras de betalactamasas de espectro extendido (BLEE); en cuanto a la pérdida del injerto, el HR fue de 4.59 en quienes tuvieron cultivo bacteriano positivo y de 4.25 en aquellos con cepas productoras de BLEE. Conclusiones: Se encontró riesgo significativo de muerte en receptores de trasplante renal con cultivo bacteriano positivo y mayor riesgo de pérdida del injerto en aquellos con cultivo bacteriano positivo y aislamiento de cepas productoras de BLEE. La tasa de enterobacterias productoras de BLEE es alta, por ello son necesarias estrategias más estrictas para controlar del uso de antibióticos.

Abstract Introduction: Immunosuppressive treatments have improved graft and patient survival rates, but can increase the incidence of post-transplant infections. Objectives: To analyze data from kidney transplant patients and describe the pathogens responsible for the infections they experience. Methods: Longitudinal, analytical, observational study of 103 patients who underwent kidney transplantation. The follow-up period was 5.07 ± 1.28 years. Results: Overall mortality rate was 10.68% and graft loss rate was 14.56%. Regarding recipient risk of death, the Cox regression model showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.66 for positive bacterial cultures and 2.22 for positive extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains; as for graft loss, HR was 4.59 in those with positive bacterial cultures and 4.25 in those who were positive for ESBL-producing strains Conclusions: Significant death risk was found in kidney transplant recipients with positive bacterial cultures and an increased risk of graft loss in those with positive bacterial cultures and in those who were positive for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates. The rate of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae is high, and stricter strategies are therefore necessary to control the use of antibiotics.

Efecto del cambio en el peso tras el trasplante renal en la supervivencia del injerto / Effect of weight change after renal transplantation on outcomes of graft survival

Antecedentes y objetivo: Tras el trasplante renal se produce de manera global un incremento del peso pudiendo aumentar el riesgo de enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) y de pérdida del injerto. Pero no todos los pacientes ganan peso, y la repercusión sobre el injerto de esta diferente evolución, no está bien estudiado. El objetivo fue determinar las causas de esta diferente evolución y su efecto sobre el injerto. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo unicéntrico de 201 pacientes seguidos tras el trasplante, analizando los determinantes de la variación del peso al año mediante regresión logística, y su efecto sobre la pérdida del injerto al final del seguimiento mediante regresión de Cox. Resultados: Globalmente se produjo durante el primer año un aumento de peso de 4,5kg de media, pero un 26,6% perdieron peso. El 37,2% aumentó su índice de masa corporal (IMC), mientras que el 9,5% lo disminuyó. Los determinantes de la diferente evolución del peso fueron la edad (OR por cada 10 años: 0,6; p=0,002), la modalidad de diálisis previa (ref. hemodiálisis) (OR: 0,3; p=0,003) y el IMC previo al trasplante (OR: 0,9; p=0,003). La diferente evolución del peso no influyó en la pérdida del injerto. Sí influyeron el IMC al año como variable continua (HR: 1,3; p=0,003) y la obesidad, con peor evolución (HR: 7,0; p=0,025). Conclusiones: Aunque no todos los pacientes ganan peso tras el trasplante renal, la diferente evolución del peso no influye en la supervivencia del injerto. (AU)

Background and objective: After kidney transplantation, there is an overall increase in weight, which may increase the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and graft loss. But, not all patients gain weight, and the impact on the graft of this different evolution has not been well studied. The objective was to determine the causes of this different evolution and its effect on the graft. Patients and methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study of 201 patients followed up after transplantation, analyzing the determinants of the variation in weight at one year using logistic regression, and its effect on graft survival at the end of follow-up using Cox regression. Results: Globally, there was an average weight gain of 4.5kg in the first year, but 26.6% lost weight. 37.2% increased their BMI, while 9.5% decreased it. The determinants of the different evolution of weight were age (OR for every 10 years: 0.6, P=.002), previous dialysis modality (ref. hemodialysis) (OR 0.3, P=.003), and BMI before transplantation (OR 0.9, P=.017). The different evolution of weight did not influence the final situation of the graft. The BMI at one year did influence as a continuous variable (HR 1.3, P=.003), and obesity, with a worse evolution (HR 7.0, P=.025). Conclusions: Although not all patients gain weight after kidney transplantation, the different evolution of weight does not influence graft survival. (AU)

Effect of weight change after renal transplantation on outcomes of graft survival.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After kidney transplantation, there is an overall increase in weight, which may increase the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and graft loss. But, not all patients gain weight, and the impact on the graft of this different evolution has not been well studied. The objective was to determine the causes of this different evolution and its effect on the graft. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort study of 201 patients followed up after transplantation, analyzing the determinants of the variation in weight at one year using logistic regression, and its effect on graft survival at the end of follow-up using Cox regression. RESULTS: Globally, there was an average weight gain of 4.5 kg in the first year, but 26.6% lost weight. 37.2% increased their BMI, while 9.5% decreased it. The determinants of the different evolution of weight were age (OR for every 10 years: 0.6, p = 0.002), previous dialysis modality (ref. hemodialysis) (OR 0.3, p = 0.003), and BMI before transplantation (OR 0.9, p = 0.017). The different evolution of weight did not influence the final situation of the graft. The BMI at one year did influence as a continuous variable (HR 1.3, p = 0.003), and obesity, with a worse evolution (HR 7.0, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although not all patients gain weight after kidney transplantation, the different evolution of weight does not influence graft survival.

[Kidney transplantation in pediatric age.] / Trasplante renal pediátrico.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for children in end-stage renal disease. KT has less mortality than dialysis and provides a better quality of life. Thus, the inclusion criteria have been progressively broadened. Histocompatibility and the source of donation are the most relevant factors that influence graft survival. Graft and patient survival have improved dramatically in recent decades, coming close to the results of KT in adults. Some of the specific factors that differentiate it from the adult are: donor-recipient size mismatch,the impact on growth and therapeutic non-compliance. Overall graft survival at 5-years is 90% for living donor KT and 70% for cadaveric donor KT.The most frequent cause of graft loss is chronic rejection.Mortality in the first post-transplant years is less than 6.5%. Infections and cardiovascular complications are the main causes of transplant-related death.Despite the good results, it is imperative to continue investigating how to achieve immunological tolerance. In order to improve the long-term results of the kidney graftis necessary to reduce immunosuppressive treatment and its side effects, such as chronic rejection.

El Trasplante Renal (TR) es el tratamiento de elección para los niños que se encuentran en insuficiencia renal terminal. Los criterios de inclusión se han ido ampliando de manera progresiva al conocerse que su mortalidad es menor que la que ocurre en diálisis y proporciona una mejor calidad de vida. La histocompatibilidad y la fuente de donación son, de entre los numerosos factores que influyen en la supervivencia del injerto, los de mayor relevancia. La supervivencia del injerto y la del paciente han mejorado de forma espectacular en las últimas décadas, aproximándose a los resultados del TR en el adulto. La diferencia de tamaño entre donante y receptor, la afectación del crecimiento y la falta de cumplimiento terapéutico, son algunos de los factores específicos que lo diferencian del adulto.La supervivencia global del injerto a los 5 años es del 90% para el TR de donante vivo y del 70% para el TRde donante cadáver.La causa más frecuente de pérdida del injerto es el rechazo crónico. La mortalidad en los primeros años post-trasplante es inferior al 6,5%. La infección y las complicaciones cardiovasculares son las causas principales de muerte relacionada con el trasplante.Sin embargo, a pesar de estos buenos resultados, es preciso continuar investigando en cómo alcanzar la tolerancia inmunológica, que permita reducir el tratamiento inmunosupresor y sus efectos colaterales, entre los que se encuentra el rechazo crónico; y así poder mejorar los resultados a largo plazo del injerto renal.

Trasplante renal pediátrico / Pediatric kidney transplant

El Trasplante Renal (TR) es el tratamientode elección para los niños que se encuentran en insufi-ciencia renal terminal. Los criterios de inclusión se hanido ampliando de manera progresiva al conocerse quesu mortalidad es menor que la que ocurre en diálisis yproporciona una mejor calidad de vida. La histocompatibilidad y la fuente de donación son, de entre losnumerosos factores que influyen en la supervivencia delinjerto, los de mayor relevancia. La supervivencia delinjerto y la del paciente han mejorado de forma espectacular en las últimas décadas, aproximándose a losresultados del TR en el adulto. La diferencia de tamañoentre donante y receptor, la afectación del crecimientoy la falta de cumplimiento terapéutico, son algunos delos factores específicos que lo diferencian del adulto. La supervivencia global del injerto a los 5 años es del90% para el TR de donante vivo y del 70% para el TRde donante cadáver.La causa más frecuente de pérdida del injerto es elrechazo crónico. La mortalidad en los primeros añospost-trasplante es inferior al 6,5%. La infección y lascomplicaciones cardiovasculares son las causas principales de muerte relacionada con el trasplante.Sin embargo, a pesar de estos buenos resultados, espreciso continuar investigando en cómo alcanzar latolerancia inmunológica, que permita reducir el tratamiento inmunosupresor y sus efectos colaterales, entrelos que se encuentra el rechazo crónico; y así podermejorar los resultados a largo plazo del injerto renal.(AU)

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the besttreatment for children in end-stage renal disease. KT hasless mortality than dialysis and provides a better qualityof life. Thus, the inclusion criteria have been progressively broadened. Histocompatibility and the source ofdonation are the most relevant factors that influence graftsurvival. Graft and patient survival have improved dramatically in recent decades, coming close to the resultsof KT in adults. Some of the specific factors that differentiate it from the adult are: donor-recipient size mismatch,the impact on growth and therapeutic non-compliance.Overall graft survival at 5-years is 90% for living donorKT and 70% for cadaveric donor KT.The most frequent cause of graft loss is chronic rejection. Mortality in the first post-transplant years is less than 6.5%. Infections and cardiovascular complications arethe main causes of transplant-related death.Despite the good results, it is imperative to continue investigating how to achieve immunological tolerance. Inorder to improve the long-term results of the kidney graftis necessary to reduce immunosuppressive treatment andits side effects, such as chronic rejection.(AU)

Effect of weight change after renal transplantation on outcomes of graft survival. / Efecto del cambio en el peso tras el trasplante renal en la supervivencia del injerto.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: After kidney transplantation, there is an overall increase in weight, which may increase the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and graft loss. But, not all patients gain weight, and the impact on the graft of this different evolution has not been well studied. The objective was to determine the causes of this different evolution and its effect on the graft. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective single-center cohort study of 201 patients followed up after transplantation, analyzing the determinants of the variation in weight at one year using logistic regression, and its effect on graft survival at the end of follow-up using Cox regression. RESULTS: Globally, there was an average weight gain of 4.5kg in the first year, but 26.6% lost weight. 37.2% increased their BMI, while 9.5% decreased it. The determinants of the different evolution of weight were age (OR for every 10 years: 0.6, P=.002), previous dialysis modality (ref. hemodialysis) (OR 0.3, P=.003), and BMI before transplantation (OR 0.9, P=.017). The different evolution of weight did not influence the final situation of the graft. The BMI at one year did influence as a continuous variable (HR 1.3, P=.003), and obesity, with a worse evolution (HR 7.0, P=.025). CONCLUSIONS: Although not all patients gain weight after kidney transplantation, the different evolution of weight does not influence graft survival.

Caracterización de la evolución clínica del trasplante renal en pacientes con virus de la hepatitis C positivo / Characterization of the clinical course of kidney transplantation in patients with positive hepatitis C virus

Introducción: La infección por el virus de la hepatitis C es un evento común en los receptores de trasplante renal que la arrastran desde su estancia en los tratamientos de hemodiálisis previos al implante. La positividad al virus C se ha asociado a una evolución desfavorable después del trasplante, dado por una mayor frecuencia de complicaciones clínicas, metabólicas e inmunológicas que repercuten de forma negativa tanto en la supervivencia del injerto como del paciente. Objetivos: Caracterizar la evolución clínica de los pacientes trasplantados de riñón con virus de la hepatitis C positivo y determinar la evolución de este grupo de enfermo de acuerdo a variables demográficas, clínicas y de supervivencia. Método: Estudio analítico, transversal, retrospectivo en pacientes trasplantados renales del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras, desde el año 2005 al 2017. Se excluyeron los menores de 15 años, los retrasplantes, los trasplantes dobles y los combinados o cuando no se pudo obtener la información. Se comparan las variables escogidas entre enfermos que llegan al trasplante con serología positiva al virus C, (HVC positivos), con los HVC negativos. Resultados: Del total de 156 enfermos, 65 por ciento (102) fueron HVC positivos, no se encontraron diferencias entre grupo en cuanto a edad y sexo de receptores y donantes, así como tampoco en el tratamiento inmunosupresor utilizado. El donante vivo se empleó menos en los HVC positivos donde se encontraron más enfermos con poliquistosis renal. La necrosis tubular aguda (NTA) y el rechazo fueron más frecuentes en los HVC positivos, siendo la primera estadísticamente significativa, p=0,0421, también resultaron significativamente más frecuente en el grupo HVC positivo, la proteinuria, p=0,041, la elevación de enzimas hepáticas, p=0,047 y la diabetes postrasplante, p=0,047. La supervivencia del injerto y los pacientes fue menor en los HVC positivos. Conclusiones: En este estudio la hepatitis por virus C impacta negativamente en la evolución del injerto y propicia la aparición de algunas complicaciones clínicas, lo que sin dudas pudiera influir en una menor expectativa de vida tanto para el injerto como para el enfermo(AU)

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus infection is a common event in kidney transplant recipients that has dragged it along since their stay in hemodialysis treatments prior to implantation. Positivity to virus C has been associated with an unfavorable evolution after transplantation, due to higher frequency of clinical, metabolic and immunological complications that negatively affect both graft and patient survival. Objectives: To describe the clinical evolution of kidney transplant patients with positive hepatitis C virus and to determine the evolution of this group of patients according to demographic, clinical and survival variables. Method: An analytical, cross-sectional, retrospective study in kidney transplant patients at Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital was carried out from 2005 to 2017. This study excluded children under 15 years of age, re-transplants, double and combined transplants or when it was not possible to gather the information. The variables chosen among patients who arrive at transplantation with positive serology for virus C (positive HCV) were compared with negative HCV. Results: One hundred and fifty six patients were the total, 65 percent (102) were HVC positive, no differences were found between groups in terms of age and sex of recipients and donors, nor in the immunosuppressive treatment used. The living donor was less used in positive HVC where more patients with polycystic kidney disease were found. Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and rejection were more frequent in positive HVC, the former being statistically significant, p = 0.0421, proteinuria, p = 0.041, elevation was also significantly more frequent in the positive HVC group of liver enzymes, p = 0.047 and post-transplant diabetes, p = 0.047. Graft and patient survival was lower in positive HCV. Conclusions: In this study, hepatitis C virus has negative impact on the evolution of the graft and favors the appearance of some clinical complications, which undoubtedly could influence a shorter life expectancy for both the graft and the patient(AU)

Trasplante hepático infantil: necesidad del país, normativa y legislación para priorizar a los pacientes pediátricos / Pediatric liver transplant, need of country, normative and legislation to prioritize pediatric patient

El Ecuador no contaba con un programa de trasplante hepático infantil y fue un problema para las autoridades de salud. Como alternativa de tratamiento se implementó un sistema de deriva-ción internacional para que los pacientes hayan accedido al trasplante en centros calificados, con la modalidad del donante vivo relacionado. Se logró acreditar en el 2019 en la ciudad de Cuenca, el primer programa de trasplante infantil para generar un cambio importante en el sis-tema de atenciones, pero fue necesario dejar clara todas las normas y regulaciones que involu-cren la prioridad de éstos pacientes y los aspectos técnicos quirúrgicos que han implicado la uti-lización de éste tipo de procedimientos como: split, hígado reducido y donante vivo relacionado.

Ecuador did not have a child liver transplant program and was a problem for health authorities. As an alternative treatment, an international referral system was implemented so that the patients had access to the transplant in qualified centers, with the modality of the living donor related. It was possible to accredit in 2019 in the city of Cuenca, the first child transplant program to generate a major change in the care system, but it was necessary to make clear all the rules and regulations that involve the priority of these patients and the technical aspects Surgical that have involved the use of these types of procedures such as: split, reduced liver and related living donor.

Characterization of kidney transplant patients with expanded criteria donors / Caracterización de trasplantados renales con donantes de criterios expandidos

Abstract Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with chronic kidney disease; however, the number of donors is insufficient, and waiting lists grow exponentially each year. Transplantation from expanded criteria donors benefits a significant number of patients, improving their survival when compared to those who remain on dialysis. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of patients who have received transplants from expanded criteria donors and their renal function at the first and third years after transplantation. Methods: A descriptive observational study was conducted. Patients older than 18 years who received transplants from an expanded criteria donor were chosen between 2007 and 2015. Results: Of a total of 227 patients analyzed, 18 received transplants from an expanded criteria donor. The recipients were 59.5 years old (37-79) and had spent 22.4 months on the waiting list (2.6-77.8) and 4.5 years on dialysis (0.5-18.4). The donors' age was 61 years (50-73). Graft survival at one year was 88.9%; at three years, it was 80%. A total of 11.1% of the patients presented acute cellular rejection at one year, and the average glomerular filtration rate at the first and third years was 58.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conclusion: Patients who received transplants from expanded criteria donors have good kidney graft function at three years, with graft and patient survival, similar to that reported for patients who received transplants from standard criteria donors (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.36104/amc.2019.1185).

Resumen Introducción: el trasplante renal es el tratamiento de elección para pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica, sin embargo, el número de donantes es insuficiente y las listas de espera crecen exponencialmente cada año. El trasplante con donante de criterios expandidos beneficia a un número importante de pacientes, mejorando su supervivencia al compararlos con los que permanecen en diálisis. El objetivo de este estudio es describir las características de pacientes trasplantados con donantes de criterios expandidos y su función renal al primer y tercer año del trasplante. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo observacional. Se eligieron pacientes mayores de 18 años trasplantados con donante de criterios expandidos entre 2007 y 2015. Resultados: de un total de 227 pacientes analizados, 18 fueron trasplantados con donante de criterios expandidos. Los receptores tenían 59.5 años (37-79), tiempo en lista de espera de 22.4 meses (2.6-77.8), tiempo en diálisis de 4.5 años (0.5-18.4). La edad del donante fue 61 años (50-73). La supervivencia del injerto al año fue 88.9% y a los tres años de 80%. El 11.1% de los pacientes presentaron rechazo celular agudo al año y el promedio de la tasa de filtración glomerular al primer y tercer año fue de 58.4 mL/min/1.73m2 Conclusión: los pacientes trasplantados con donante de criterios expandidos tienen una buena función del injerto renal a tres años, con supervivencia del injerto y del paciente, similar a la reportada con donante con criterio estándar. (Acta Med Colomb 2019; 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2019.n85).

Factores influyentes en la supervivencia de los segundos trasplantes renales / Influential factors in the survival of the second kidney transplants

Introducción: La realización de un segundo trasplante renal es la mejor opción de tratamiento de reemplazo de la función de este órgano para aquellos enfermos que han perdido un primer injerto, no obstante, parece una terapéutica poco empleada y existe la opinión de que sus resultados son inferiores a un primer trasplante. Objetivos: Determinar el porcentaje de utilización de los segundos trasplantes renales, su supervivencia e identificar los factores que influyen en estos. Métodos: Estudio analítico, retrospectivo de corte longitudinal, que abarcó todos los trasplantes renales realizados desde 1984 al 2015, excluyendo los trasplantes en receptores menores de 15 años, dobles, combinados o cuando no se pudo obtener toda la información. Se compararon los resultados de la supervivencia en general, y los de cada variable de los segundos trasplantes con los de los primarios a través de las curvas de Kaplan y Meier y de forma multivariada con una regresión de Cox. Resultados: La utilización de los segundos trasplantes renales fue de 5,6 por ciento, con una supervivencia global similar a los primarios. En el análisis comparativo de las curvas de acuerdo a las variables utilizadas no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos grupos de estudio, de forma multivariada sí emergieron como factores de riesgo independientes para la pérdida del injerto, la edad del receptor ≥ 55 años, la edad del donante ≥ 50 años, la presencia de necrosis tubular aguda y el rechazo en los trasplantes primarios, mientras que en los secundarios esto solo ocurrió cuando la edad del donante fue ≥ a 50 años y presentaron necrosis tubular aguda. Conclusiones: El porcentaje de utilización de un segundo trasplante fue bajo, con una supervivencia similar al primero, influenciada por variables propias del receptor y del acto del trasplante(AU)

Introduction: Performing a second kidney transplant is the best treatment option to replace the function of this organ for those patients who have lost a first graft. However, it seems a little used therapeutics and there is the opinion that its results are inferior to a first transplant. However, it seems a little used therapy and there is the opinion that its results are inferior to a first transplant. Objective: To determine the percentage of use of the second kidney transplants, their survival and identify the influential factors. Methods: An analytical, retrospective longitudinal study was done in all renal transplants performed from 1984 to 2015, excluding transplants in recipients under 15 years old, doubles, combined or when all the information could not be obtained. The results of survival in general were compared, and those of each variable of the second transplants were compared with those of the primary ones through Kaplan and Meier curves and multivariate with a Cox regression. Results: The use of a second renal transplants was 5.6 percent, with global survival similar to the primary ones. The comparative analysis of the curves according to the variables used were found no statistically significant different between the two study groups, although multivariate did emerge as independent risk factors for graft loss, the age of the recipient 55 years, the age of the donor 50 years, the presence of acute tubular necrosis and rejection in primary transplants, while in secondary cases this only occurred when the age of the donor was 50 years and they presented acute tubular necrosis. Conclusions: The percentage of a second transplant was low, with similar survival to the primary one, influenced by specific variables of the recipient and the act of transplantation(AU)

Does the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) predict graft and patient survival in a Spanish population? / ¿Predice el Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) la supervivencia del injerto y del paciente en una población española?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), together with other donor and recipient variables, can optimise the organ allocation process. This study aims to check the feasibility of the KDPI for a Spanish population and its predictive ability of graft and patient survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2,734 kidney transplants carried out in Andalusia between January 2006 and December 2015 were studied. Cases were grouped by recipient age, categorised by KDPI quartile and both graft and patient survival were compared among groups. RESULTS: The KDPI accurately discriminated optimal organs from suboptimal or marginal ones. For adult recipients (aged: 18-59years) it presents a hazard ratio of 1.013 (P<.001) for death-censored graft survival and of 1.013 (P=.007) for patient survival. For elderly recipients (aged: 60+years), KDPI presented a hazard ratio of 1.016 (P=.001) for death-censored graft survival and of 1.011 (P=.007) for patient survival. A multivariate analysis identified the KDPI, donor age, donation after circulatory death, recipient age and gender as predictive factors of graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show that the KDPI makes it possible to relate the donor's characteristics with the greater or lesser survival of the graft and the patient in the Spanish population. However, due to certain limitations, a new index for Spain based on Spanish or European data should be created. In this study, some predictive factors of graft survival are identified that may serve as a first step in this path.

Development and results of a novel pancreas transplant program in Spain: the surgeon's point of view. / Desarrollo y resultados de un nuevo programa de trasplante de páncreas en España: la visión del cirujano.

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage chronic renal disease is widely performed. However, the rate of surgical morbidity from pancreatic complications remains high. The aim of this study was to describe the development and results of a new program, from the point of view of the pancreatic surgeon. METHODS: We analyzed 53 simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantations performed over a period of seven years (2009-2016), with a median follow up of 39 months (range: 1-86 months). RESULTS: Out of the total of this series, two patients died: one patient because of cardiac arrest immediately after surgery; and another patient due to traffic accident, complicated by pneumonia. Among the 51 living patients, two grafts were lost: one due to chronic rejection four years after transplantation; and the other due to arterial thrombosis 20 days after transplantation (the only case requiring transplantectomy). In ten patients, one or more re-operations were necessary due to the following: graft pancreatitis (n=4), small intestinal obstruction (n=4), arterial thrombosis (n=1), fistula (n=1) and hemoperitoneum (n=1). Overall patient and graft survival rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 98, 95 and 95% and 96, 93 and 89%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the results of a new pancreas transplant program, which relies on the previous experience of other groups, do not demonstrate a learning curve. Adequate surgeon education and training, as well as the proper use of standardized techniques, should ensure optimal results.