Tracking Residents' Surgical Outcomes Using Data from the Quality In-Training Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: Monitoring resident trainees' patient outcomes is essential to improving surgical performance; however, resident-specific follow-up is rarely provided in the current surgical training environment. Whether there is a correlation between individual resident's surgical performance and patients' clinical outcomes remains undefined. In this study, we aimed to use risk-adjusted patient outcomes as an educational tool to track individual surgical trainee performance. STUDY DESIGN: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) appendectomy and partial colectomy operations (2013-2021) were examined. Residents performing ≥25 operations were included. The primary outcome was ACS NSQIP-defined morbidity adjusted using estimated probability of morbidity. Observed-to-expected ratios (O/E) of morbidity measured overall performance and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) methodology represented surgical resident's performance over time. SETTING: Academic quaternary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: Highest-ranking surgical resident participating in an operation and included in Quality In-Training Initiative. RESULTS: A total of 449 operations were examined. 12 residents performed 343 appendectomy operations. 7 residents (29.3 ± 5.1 operations each) did not have any postoperative morbidity and demonstrated better-than-expected patient outcomes. Three residents did not have morbidity after their seventh/eleventh/fifteenth appendectomies. Two residents (case volume 29, 33) had an O/E ratio > 3. Partial colectomy (n = 106) performed by 4 residents had 2 residents (case volume 30, 26) with better-than-expected outcomes and 2 with worse-than-expected (case volume 25, 25). CONCLUSION: Longitudinal monitoring of postoperative patient outcomes provides an opportunity for trainee self-reflection and system examination. RA-CUSUM methodology offers sequential monitoring allowing for early evaluation and intervention when RA-CUSUM results for a trainee demonstrate higher-than-expected morbidity.

Is it time for anatomists to enter the OT? Their role in clinical anatomy education of residents: A pre-trial survey research among surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the perceived need among surgical residents to revisit their anatomical knowledge and evaluate their attitude towards integrating clinical anatomists into surgical residency program curriculum. BACKGROUND: While medical students learn human anatomy during undergraduate years, the practical application of clinically oriented anatomy becomes vital in surgical specialties. However, this aspect has not been adequately addressed in Indian surgical residency programs. METHODS: An 11-item questionnaire, including closed-ended and Likert-scale questions, was administered to 153 surgical residents. Consent was obtained, and responses were collected via Google Forms. RESULTS: Half of the respondents (50%) felt confident in their self-directed anatomy learning, but 87% believed integrating clinical anatomists would enhance their surgical expertise. Additionally, 88% saw value in revisiting cadaveric dissection. Third-year residents showed a significantly higher inclination towards cadaveric dissection. Deficiencies in the curriculum and time constraints were identified as major barriers. CONCLUSION: The study highlights a perceived need among surgical residents to augment their anatomical knowledge, advocating for the integration of clinical anatomists and cadaveric dissection into training. A collaborative approach, emphasizing both horizontal and vertical integration of anatomy, is recommended to enhance surgical education and practice. (Tab. 4, Fig. 1, Ref. 25).

Investigating Workplace Support and the Importance of Psychological Safety in General Surgery Residency Training.

OBJECTIVE: Workplace interventions that increase support can mitigate burnout, improve workplace satisfaction, and increase well-being. Our aim is to provide evidence-based targets to inform future work for operationalizing support in general surgery residency. DESIGN: This is a 2-part mixed-methods cross-sectional study. Part 1 analyzed qualitative data from focus groups (April 2021-May 2022). Part 2 comprised an online survey (informed by findings in Part 1) in May 2022 to assess the association between perceived psychological safety (PS) and flourishing, as well as PS and languishing. SETTING: National multi-center study including 16 ACGME-accredited academic programs. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents at various training levels, in both clinical and research. RESULTS: A total of 28 residents participated in the focus groups which revealed both enhancers and inhibitors of support pertaining to PS in the workplace. Enhancers of support included those currently implemented (i.e., allyship of mentors) and those proposed by residents (i.e., nonpunitive analysis of mistakes). Inhibitors of support included both systems (i.e., wellness initiatives as a 'band-aid' for systems issues) and culture (i.e., indefatigability, stoicism). About 251 residents (31%) responded to the survey which revealed higher perception of PS was significantly associated with flourishing at the level of residency program and departmental leadership. Lower perception of PS was significantly associated with languishing at the level of residency program leadership only. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the promotion of PS, such as expansion of mentorship to include advocacy (advocating on a resident's behalf, recognition when mistreated) and affirmation (i.e., soliciting opinions on controversial social matters/events, recognizing different life experiences), cultural acceptance of asking for help (without being perceived as weak), formal help navigating interpersonal dynamics (i.e., guidance from senior residents), and leadership presentations and modeling to destigmatize asking for help, as a means of operationalizing workplace support to increase flourishing and decrease languishing.

Structured Resident Training in Robotic Surgery: Recommendations of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: A universal resident robotic surgery training pathway that maximizes proficiency and safety has not been defined by a consensus of surgical educators or by surgical societies. The objective of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group was to develop a universal curriculum pathway and leverage digital tools to support resident education. DESIGN: The two lead authors (JP and YN) contacted potential members of the Working Group. Members were selected based on their authorship of peer-review publications, their experience as minimally invasive and robotic surgeons, their reputations, and their ability to commit the time involved to work collaboratively and efficiently to reach consensus regarding best practices in robotic surgery education. The Group's approach was to reach 100% consensus to provide a transferable curriculum that could be applied to the vast majority of resident programs. SETTING: Virtual and in-person meetings in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Eight surgeons (2 females and 6 males) from five academic medical institutions (700-1541 beds) and three community teaching hospitals (231-607 beds) in geographically diverse locations comprised the Working Group. They represented highly specialized general surgeons and educators in their mid-to-late careers. All members were experienced minimally invasive surgeons and had national reputations as robotic surgery educators. RESULTS: The surgeons initially developed and agreed upon questions for each member to consider and respond to individually via email. Responses were collated and consolidated to present on an anonymized basis to the Group during an in-person day-long meeting. The surgeons self-facilitated and honed the agreed upon responses of the Group into a 5-level Robotic Surgery Curriculum Pathway, which each member agreed was relevant and expressed their convictions and experience. CONCLUSIONS: The current needs for a universal robotic surgery training curriculum are validated objective and subjective measures of proficiency, access to simulation, and a digital platform that follows a resident from their first day of residency through training and their entire career. Refinement of current digital solutions and continued innovation guided by surgical educators is essential to build and maintain a scalable, multi-institutional supported curriculum.

Variation in Competence of Graduating General Surgery Trainees.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the readiness of general surgery residents in their final year of training to perform 5 common surgical procedures based on their documented performance during training. DESIGN: Intraoperative performance ratings were analyzed using a Bayesian mixed effects approach, adjusting for rater, trainee, procedure, case complexity, and postgraduate year (PGY) as random effects as well as month in academic year and cumulative, procedure-specific performance per trainee as fixed effects. This model was then used to estimate each PGY 5 trainee's final probability of being able to independently perform each procedure. The actual, documented competency rates for individual trainees were then identified across each of the 5 most common general surgery procedures: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, groin hernia repair, and partial colectomy. SETTING: This study was conducted using data from members of the SIMPL collaborative. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 17,248 evaluations of 927 PGY5 general surgery residents were analyzed from 2015 to 2021. RESULTS: The percentage of residents who requested a SIMPL rating during their PGY5 year and achieved a ≥90% probability of being rated as independent, or "Practice-Ready," was 97.4% for appendectomy, 82.4% for cholecystectomy, 43.5% for ventral hernia repair, 24% for groin hernia repair, and 5.3% for partial colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variation in the demonstrated competency of general surgery residents to perform several common surgical procedures at the end of their training. This variation in readiness calls for careful study of how surgical residents can become more adequately prepared to enter independent practice.

Impact of Surgical Resident Education and EMR Standardization in Enhancing ERAS Adherence and Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed at investigating the degree of adherence to ERAS pathway at our institution and to evaluate the role of providing resident education and a standardized EMR order set in improving adherence and patient surgical outcomes. DESIGN: The study is prospective in nature and consists of two phases with a preintervention cohort to assess adherence to ERAS protocol and a postintervention cohort to evaluate improvement in adherence and patient outcomes. Adherence with the ERAS protocol was assessed across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. SETTING: The study took place at MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland, involving inpatient care at a surgical ward. PARTICIPANTS: During the preintervention phase, patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were identified over 6 months (N = 77), and their adherence to the ERAS protocol was assessed. Following the intervention of surgical resident and faculty education sessions on the ERAS protocol and the implementation of a standardized order set in the Electronic Medical Record, a postintervention cohort (N = 54) was selected for comparison over another 6 months. RESULTS: Among 77 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery, the adherence rate to ERAS protocol was notably below 80% for most elements of the postoperative phase. When pre- and postintervention cohorts were compared, there were no significant differences in the baseline demographics and perioperative variables. After the implementation of our intervention, adherence rates were significantly improved in 7 out of 8 ERAS protocol elements of the postintervention phase. Among primary outcome measures, readmission rate (24.7% vs.9.4%; p = 0.022) and length of stay (7.3 ± 4.5 vs. 5.5 ± 3.6; p = 0.014) were significantly lower in the postintervention cohort. Although the rate of postoperative complications did not decrease significantly (33.8% vs. 31.5%; p = 0.284), there were fewer patients with postoperative ileus and surgical site infections. Outcomes were evaluated based on an 8-point score of postoperative ERAS elements. A significant decrease in mean length of stay and readmission rates is observed when at least 5 elements are completed, emphasizing the ERAS pathway's importance as a complementary bundle. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the impact of resident education and electronic medical record standardization on ERAS adherence in colorectal surgery. This multidisciplinary approach improves adherence, reduces hospital stay, and enhances communication among healthcare providers for better patient outcomes.

Implementation of an Online Intraoperative Assessment of Technical Performance for Surgical Trainees.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of surgical resident technical performance is an integral component of any surgical training program. Timely assessment delivered in a structured format is a critical step to enhance technical skills, but residents often report that the quality and quantity of timely feedback received is lacking. Moreover, the absence of written feedback with specificity can allow residents to seemingly progress in their operative milestones as a junior resident, but struggle as they progress into their postgraduate year 3 and above. We therefore designed and implemented a web-based intraoperative assessment tool and corresponding summary "dashboard" to facilitate real-time assessment and documentation of technical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web form was designed leveraging a cloud computing platform and implementing a modified Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation instrument; this included additional, procedure-specific criteria for select operations. A link to this was provided to residents via email and to all surgical faculty as a Quick Response code. Residents open and complete a portion of the form on a smartphone, then relinquish the device to an attending surgeon who then completes and submits the assessment. The data are then transferred to a secure web-based reporting interface; each resident (together with a faculty advisor) can then access and review all completed assessments. RESULTS: The Assessment form was activated in June 2021 and formally introduced to all residents in July 2021, with residents required to complete at least one assessment per month. Residents with less predictable access to operative procedures (night float or Intensive Care Unit) were exempted from the requirement on those months. To date a total of 559 assessments have been completed for operations performed by 56 trainees, supervised by 122 surgical faculty and senior trainees. The mean number of procedures assessed per resident was 10.0 and the mean number per assessor was 4.6. Resident initiation of Intraoperative Assessments has increased since the tool was introduced and scores for technical and nontechnical performance reliably differentiate residents by seniority. CONCLUSIONS: This novel system demonstrates that an online, resident-initiated technical assessment tool is feasible to implement and scale. This model's requirement that the attending enter performance ratings into the trainee's electronic device ensures that feedback is delivered directly to the trainee. Whether this aspect of our assessment ensures more direct and specific (and therefore potentially actionable) feedback is a focus for future study. Our use of commercial cloud computing services should permit cost-effective adoption of similar systems at other training programs.

Flourishing and the Prioritization of Workplace Elements in General Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: To explore and begin to operationalize workplace elements that influence general surgery (GS) resident wellbeing. Tailoring workplace wellbeing interventions is critical to their success. Occupational science has revealed that a person-centered approach to identifying positive and negative workplace influences can inform tailoring while accounting for individual differences. To our knowledge, this approach has not been applied to the surgical training environment. METHODS: A national sample of GS residents from 16 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education training programs ranked the importance of workplace elements via an anonymous survey. Latent profile analysis was performed to identify shared patterns of workplace element prioritization and their relation to levels of flourishing, a measure of global wellbeing. RESULTS: GS trainee respondents (n = 300, 34% response rate - average for studies with this sample population) expressed a hierarchy of workplace element importance which differed by gender and race. "Skills to manage stress" and "a team you feel a part of" were prioritized higher by non-males than males. Residents of color and residents underrepresented in medicine, respectively, prioritized "recognition of work/effort" and "skills to manage stress" more than White and overrepresented in medicine residents. Flourishing prevalence varied by 40% with small differences in the specific profile of workplace element prioritization. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in prioritization of workplace elements reveal subtle but important differences that may guide the design of wellbeing interventions for different populations within surgery.

Educational Value of Surgical Residents Operating as Teaching Assistant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the educational of value of teaching assistant (TA) cases from the perspectives of attending, chief resident, and junior resident. We hypothesized the greatest educational value of TA cases would be for chief residents more so than other team members. DESIGN: A prospective survey was designed and collected for TA cases separately from attendings, chief residents, and junior residents to assess operative details and educational value. The study period ran from August 2021 through December 2022. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was undertaken to compare answers and discover themes in the free-text responses of attendings and residents. SETTING: Single center, tertiary care institution, Maine Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Portland, ME PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-nine teaching assistant cases were captured from a total of 117 completed surveys that were completed by 44 chief residents, 49 junior residents, 22 attendings (n = 22) and 2 APPs. RESULTS: A wide variety of TA cases were included in the study with the most common reason for performing a TA case being resident request 68%. Operative complexity was most commonly rated easiest third (50%) and middle third (41%) of overall cases. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time. Attendings reported learning something about the resident's skills that they were not expecting in 59% of the cases. Thematic analysis: attendings focused on the steps of the procedure, including the technical aspects, particularly regarding opening while residents largely focused on communication and preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching assistant cases seem to have more educational value for chief and junior residents than attendings. Both junior and chief residents felt that compared to working with an attending alone, TA cases contributed more or much more to their procedural independence >80% of the time.

General Surgery Training and One Year of COVID-19. What Has Been the Impact on Residents' Operating Room Surgical Activity? A Report From an Italian Academic Hospital.

BACKGROUND: In the last year and a half, the COVID-19 pandemic has put great pressure on the healthcare systems of many countries, Italy included, leading to a reorganization of hospital activities and a dramatic reduction in surgical activity. Our study aimed to evaluate, from a quantitative and qualitative perspective, the impact of this reduction on the formation of surgery residents at the Academic Hospital of Udine. METHODS: We compared the resident's surgical activity during the pandemic year (March 2020-2021) with the one during the pre-pandemic year, declining the surgical procedures by timing, type, and complexity and categorizing the residents by postgraduate year (PGY) and surgical role. RESULTS: Our analysis highlighted how the main reductions occurred in the elective and medium complexity surgery due to the procrastination of benign pathologies such as hernias, cholelithiasis, and hemorrhoids, which also appeared to be the more frequent cases where the residents are first operators. On the other hand, the residents of the last PGY still maintained a good exposure to neoplasm and high complexity interventions, which are cardinal aspects in the last year of formation. CONCLUSIONS: These results mostly confirmed the critical points noted by the resident surgeons themselves, highlighting however the specific impact on different PGY and surgical activities, offering a starting point to better understand how to challenge the negative effect that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the surgical resident formation.

Evaluating opioid prescribing patterns following discharge from elective surgical procedures: a worrying trend during the 'opioid crisis' - an audit of elective surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: The 'opioid crisis' has reached epidemic proportions globally. Importantly, 30% of opioid dependency stem from opioids obtained on hospital discharge prescriptions. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate opioid prescription patterns on discharge of post-operative patients in an Irish Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a single institution during the 5 year eligibility period (January 2017-October 2021). Comparisons in opioid prescription patterns following minor (inguinal hernia repair (IHR), intermediate (laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)) and major (colonic resection (CR)) were made. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS version 26.0 RESULTS: In total, 300 patients were included in this study with mean age 59.6 years (range: 20-92). Of these, 112 patients underwent IHR (37.3%), 116 patients underwent LC (38.7%), and 72 patients underwent CR (24.0%). The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years, 53 years and 58 years for IHR, LC and CR, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing CR were more likely to have greater comorbidity burden (3.1 vs. 1.2 (IHR) vs. 1.8 (LC) respectively (P = 0.030). On discharge, 27.8% of CR patients received opioids (20/72) compared to 24.1% of IHR (28/116) and 15.9% of LC (18/113) patients, respectively (P = 0.126). CONCLUSION: We observed considerable variability in opioid prescribing patterns following minor, intermediate and major operations in our centre. Care is required when prescribing opioids in the post-operative setting, and opioid prescription guidelines are required to both tackle and prevent an escalation of this 'opioid crisis'.

Black clouds in surgery: A study of surgical resident workload and burnout.

BACKGROUND: The concept of a 'black cloud' is a common unfounded perception in the healthcare workforce that attributes a heavier workload to specific individuals or teams. Prior studies in non-surgical disciplines have demonstrated that 'black cloud' perceptions are not associated with workload, albeit such perceptions may influence behavior. The influence of 'black cloud' perceptions on surgical resident workload and burnout remains to be investigated. This study assesses the associations between 'black cloud' self-perception with actual workload and burnout among surgical residents in different specialties. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of postgraduate year (PGY) 2 and 3 residents enrolled in different surgical residencies at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai was conducted between September-November 2021. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 62.1% (41/66). 46.3% of respondents were female. The majority of subjects were single (61%) and PGY2 trainees (56.1%). In a multivariate regression analysis demographic factors and workload variables, such as the number of pages responded, notes, and amount of sleep, were not significant predictors of a 'black cloud'-self-perception. A significantly lower Burnout Index Score (BIS) was observed among females (p< .001). A significantly higher BIS was observed among residents who are single (p = .003), training in general surgery (p = .02), and orthopedic surgery (p = .03). There was no significant association between 'black cloud' self-perception and BIS. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate that a 'black cloud' self-perception is not associated with a high workload and burnout among surgical residents. Gender, marriage/domestic partnership, and certain surgical specialties influenced burnout among the study cohort.

How well do we understand our patients' perioperative experience? A qualitative analysis of themes derived from patient-centric resident conferences.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centric resident conferences (PCRCs) provide meaningful time to connect with and learn from patients. This qualitative study explores themes of patients' perioperative experiences from PCRCs through patient and resident perspectives. METHODS: General Surgery residents participated in six PCRCs, which include condensed standard didactics to accommodate a patient panel regarding their perioperative experience. Panel transcripts and resident survey responses describing what they learned were coded using grounded theory methodology. Themes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: 76 identified codes were grouped into major categories: "Medical/Surgical Knowledge," "Patient Perspective," "Patient-Physician Relationship," and "Communication." Themes from resident responses predominantly paralleled patient discussion, with common themes including "impact of disease and surgery on patient" and "compassion/empathy." "Medical/surgical knowledge" was only present in resident responses while themes regarding quality of life were more frequent in patient transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: PCRCs are a valuable tool in resident education to understand patients' perioperative experiences. Themes from patient panels complement, but do not replace, information covered in didactic lectures.

Routine use of laparoscopic techniques in daily practice improves outcomes after appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the most common emergency operation and is often performed during on-call hours, when surgeons with different sub-specialties and levels of experience in emergency surgery operate on patients. However, little is known about the safety of the procedure when operations are performed by surgeons not regularly using standard laparoscopic techniques. Here we aim to assess variation in outcomes in patients operated on by surgeons with different levels of experience in laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at Tampere University Hospital between September 1, 2014 and April 30, 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. The data were analyzed by level of experience among surgeons regularly performing laparoscopic surgery and by volume among surgeons performing over 30 appendectomies per year or fewer. RESULTS: A total of 1560 patients underwent appendectomy, with 61% operated on by laparoscopic surgeons, and the rest by surgeons not habitually using laparoscopic techniques. Demographic characteristics, as well as share of patients with perforated appendicitis were similar in both groups. Morbidity was higher among those operated on by non-laparoscopic surgeons (6.1% and 3.0% p = 0.004), especially if appendicitis was complicated (18% and 5.6%, p < 0.001). Infectious complications were the most common. The risk of postoperative organ/space surgical site infections was higher among patients operated on by non-laparoscopic surgeons (3.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.006; Clavien-Dindo III-IV 2.0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.030). Morbidity was 2.7% among those operated on by surgeons performing ≥ 30 appendectomies per year compared to 5.2% among those performing < 30 appendectomies per year. In multivariate analysis surgeon's experience (p = 0.002; HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.38-3.90) and complicated disease (p < 0.001; HR 4.71; 95% CI 2.79-7.93) predicted higher morbidity. DISCUSSION: According to our study, routine use of laparoscopic techniques in daily practice improves outcomes after appendectomy. In addition, a higher surgical volume correlates with improved outcomes.

Ergonomics Workshop Improves Musculoskeletal Symptoms in General Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: Poor operative ergonomics can lead to muscle fatigue and injury. However, formal ergonomics education is uncommon in surgical residencies. Our study examines the prevalence of musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms, baseline ergonomics knowledge, and the impact of an ergonomics workshop in general surgery residents. METHODS: An anonymous voluntary presurvey and postsurvey was distributed to all general surgery residents at a single academic residency, assessing resident characteristics, MSK symptoms, and ergonomic knowledge before and after an ergonomics workshop. The workshop consisted of a lecture and a personalized posture coaching session with a physiatrist. RESULTS: The presurvey received 33/35 (94%) responses. Of respondents, 100% reported some degree of MSK pain. Prevalence of muscle stiffness and fatigue decreased with increasing height. Females reported higher frequencies of MSK pain (P = 0.01) and more muscle fatigue than males (100% versus 73%, P = 0.03). All residents reported little to no ergonomics knowledge with 68% reporting that ergonomics was rarely discussed in the operating room. The postsurvey received 26/35 (74%) responses. Of respondents, 100% reported the workshop was an effective method of ergonomics education. MSK symptom severity improved in 82% of residents. Reports that ergonomics was rarely discussed in the operating room significantly decreased to 22.8% of residents (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resident ergonomics knowledge is poor and MSK symptoms are common. Resident characteristics are associated with different MSK symptoms. Didactic teaching and personalized posture coaching improve ergonomics knowledge and reduce MSK symptom severity. Surgical residencies should consider implementing similar interventions to improve resident wellbeing.

Determinants of satisfaction and self-perceived proficiency of trainees in surgical residency programs at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify factors contributing to training program satisfaction and self-perceived proficiency of residents in 5 integrated surgical residency programs within the same referral institution. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey including all senior surgical residents in all integrated sub-specialty and general surgery residency programs at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Training programs were assessed on 6 educational components including operative case volume and diversity, intra-operative hands-on training, morning teaching sessions, seminars, ward rounds, and research opportunities. RESULTS: Of 82 eligible residents, 69 (84.1%) responded to the survey. Overall resident satisfaction (rated from 0-10) varied between the 5 training programs, from a mean of 6.03 to 7.89 (overall p = 0.03). The percentage of residents who agreed they would be proficient by the end of their training ranged from 44.2%-88.9%. General surgery residents had the lowest overall satisfaction score, and lowest scores in all educational components except seminar teaching. In multivariable analysis, operative case volume and diversity (AOR 3.67; 95% CI, 1.24-10.83; P = 0.019), and hands-on training (AOR 4.15; 95% CI, 1.27-13.5; P = 0.018) were significantly associated with overall resident satisfaction. In ordinal logistic regression, hands-on training (OR 3.94, 95% CI, 1.69-9.2; P = 0.001), and seminar sessions (OR 2.43, 95% CI, 1.11-5.33; P = 0.028) were significantly associated with self-perceived proficiency. CONCLUSION: Different surgical residency training programs within the same institution had divergent resident satisfaction scores and proficiency scores. Operative case volume and diversity, and intraoperative hands-on training are the most important predictors of resident satisfaction while hands-on training and seminar sessions independently predicted self-perceived proficiency. Attention to these key components of resident education is likely to have a strong effect on training outcomes.

The General Surgery Residency Experience: A Multicenter Study of Differences in Wellbeing by Race/Ethnicity.

Objectives: We explored differences by race/ethnicity in regard to several factors that reflect or impact wellbeing. Background: Physician wellbeing has critical ramifications for the US healthcare system, affecting clinical outcomes, patient experience, and healthcare economics. Within surgery, literature examining the association between race/ethnicity and wellbeing has been limited and inconclusive. Methods: Residents at 16 academic General Surgery training programs completed an online questionnaire. Racial/ethnic identity, gender identity, post-graduate year (PGY) level, and gap years were self-reported. Differences by race/ethnicity in flourishing (global wellbeing) as well as factors reflecting resilience (mindfulness, personal accomplishment, workplace support, workplace control) and risk (depression, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, stress, anxiety, workplace demand) were assessed. Results: Of 300 respondents (response rate 34%), 179 (60%) were non-male, 123 (41%) were residents of color (ROC), and 53 (18%) were from racial/ethnic groups that are underrepresented in medicine (UIM). Relative to White residents, ROC have significantly lower flourishing and higher anxiety, and these remain significant when adjusting for gender, PGY level, and gap years. Relative to residents overrepresented in medicine (OIM), UIM residents have significantly lower emotional exhaustion and depersonalization after adjusting for gender, PGY level and gap years. Conclusions: Disparities in resident wellbeing based on race/ethnicity and UIM/OIM status exist. However, the experience of ROC is not homogeneous. As part of the transformative process to address systemic racism, eliminate disparities in surgical training, and reconceptualize wellbeing as a fundamental asset for optimal surgeon performance, further understanding the specific contributors and detractors of wellbeing among different individuals and groups is critical.

Assessment of Chief Resident Practice Readiness in a Porcine Lab: A 4-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVE: General surgery training prepares residents for the autonomous practice of surgery; however, assessment for readiness for independent practice presents several challenges. The simulation lab offers a safe and standardized environment for assessing the technical skills of a resident in the absence of numerous confounders of the real operating room. We describe our experience with evaluation and remediation of chief resident assessments in a porcine simulation lab. DESIGN: Operative skill assessment of surgical residents was conducted using anesthetized porcine models. Procedure's representative of basic and complex operative skill was chosen for the assessment. Faculty assessed the residents using a checklist for the completion of all critical operative steps. A "failing" score or "critical fail" on a given procedure determined mandatory remediation. For remediation, faculty provided immediate post-procedure feedback on all errors, and residents were offered supervised practice. Residents were then retested to demonstrate competency. SETTING: Large animal research center at Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN PARTICIPANTS: From 2017 to 2020, thirty-seven PGY5 residents participated in the porcine lab over a 4-year period. These general surgery residents were assessed at the beginning of their chief year. RESULTS: There were a total of 6 residents that failed 1 or more procedures. There were no failures in the cholecystectomy, 3 failures for Nissen, 4 failures for Hand sewn anastomosis, and 1 failure for stapled anastomosis. Two residents failed 2 procedures. All residents received remediation with a faculty member and were subsequently able to perform the procedure competently. CONCLUSIONS: A formal simulation-based assessment of procedural competence can identify technical performance deficiencies even at the chief resident level. Combined with a formal remediation program, such deficiencies can be addressed well in advance of residency graduation. Determining the relationship of such simulation-based assessments with operative performance is currently underway.

Experience, exposure, and attitudes regarding off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting techniques in US cardiothoracic surgical residents: Results of a survey.

Background: We sought to determine the current level of exposure to and interest in off-pump coronary artery bypass and beating heart surgery techniques regarding cardiothoracic surgical residents in the United States. Methods: An email survey consisting of 6 questions was sent to all cardiothoracic surgery residents of approved cardiothoracic training programs in the United States. The survey was emailed using the Qualtrics XM cloud-based survey platform. When the email responses were received, the answers to the survey questions were tabulated by the Qualtrics software and the resident's institution and year of graduation from their residency was noted. Results: Of 400 surveys sent, we received 99 responses for a response rate of 25%. A total of 78% of cardiothoracic surgery residents reported that they are at programs that do off-pump coronary artery bypass or beating heart surgery infrequently, noting that these cases are done in less than 5% of the coronary artery bypass graftings to which they are exposed. A total of 51% responded that they do not feel comfortable with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting under any circumstances. A total of 49% reported some comfort with the technique with most of these respondents noting that they would do off-pump coronary artery bypass or beating heart surgery on a selective basis if the clinical situation arose and 4% plan to do off-pump coronary artery bypass routinely. Exposure to off-pump coronary artery bypass and beating heart surgery significantly correlated with future adoption of the technique by the cardiothoracic surgery residents. Cardiothoracic surgery residents in the lowest, middle, and highest terciles of exposure to off-pump coronary artery bypass and beating heart surgery plan to use these techniques 31%, 86%, and 75%, respectively, in selective cases when they are in independent practice. Conclusions: Over half of graduating cardiothoracic surgery residents do not feel comfortable with off-pump coronary artery bypass or beating heart surgery techniques. Exposure to these techniques in training correlates with comfort level and plans to use them in independent practice.