Research progress on adverse events during morning or afternoon surgery and perioperative period / 中国医师杂志

The occurrence of perioperative adverse events (PAEs) significantly affects postoperative recovery of patients. In recent years, more and more studies have found that the start time of surgery is closely related to the occurrence of PAE, especially in terms of hospital stay and cost, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality. This review aims to summarize the impact of different types of surgeries on PAE starting in the morning or afternoon, and to elucidate the possible mechanisms by which morning or afternoon surgeries affect PAE occurrence from the perspectives of circadian rhythms, human factors, and infrastructure, in order to provide reference for reducing patient PAE and accelerating patient recovery.

Effect of surgical starting time and season on prognosis in octogenarians with colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Aim: To investigate the effect of surgical starting time and season on the prognosis of octogenarians with colorectal cancer. Patients & methods: A total of 291 patients aged 80 years or above who received elective colectomy for colorectal cancer between January 2007 and December 2018 in the National Cancer Center in China were included. Results: No significant time- or season-dependent difference in overall survival for all clinical stages was found in the study. Comparing perioperative outcomes, the morning group had a longer operative time than the afternoon group (p = 0.03), but no significant difference was found based on the season of colectomy. Conclusion: These findings provide insights into clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients aged more than 80 years.

Recurrent studies have demonstrated that in heart surgery, different surgical starting times can affect the patients' outcomes, mainly due to the 24-h cyclic variations in heart function. This variability also exists in bowel function. The surgical outcomes of elderly patients aged over 80 years are more susceptible to external factors due to their frailty, so we wanted to compare the differences in prognosis of elderly patients who underwent surgery at different times and seasons.

Effect of Time (Season, Surgical Starting Time, Waiting Time) on Patients with Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of time (season, surgical starting time in the daytime, preoperative waiting time) on patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective collection of medical records of patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single clinical center from January 2013 to December 2018 was performed. Medical records were collected, and short-term outcomes and long-term survival were analyzed by different time groups. RESULTS: A total of 586 patients were included in this study. In terms of surgical starting time, the midday group had a shorter operation time (p=0.017) but more complications (p=0.048) than the non-midday group. No significant difference was found based on the season of gastrectomy. The long preoperative waiting group had a shorter postoperative hospital stay than the short waiting group (p=0.026). No significant difference was found between the short-waiting group and long-waiting group in overall survival for all clinical stages. Age (p=0.040, HR=1.017, 95% CI=1.001-1.033), BMI (p<0.001, HR=0.879, 95% CI=0.844-0.953) and clinical stage (p<0.001, HR=2.053, 95% CI=1.619-2.603) were independent prognostic factors predicting overall survival; however, season of gastrectomy, surgical starting time and preoperative waiting time were not identified as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Surgical starting time at the midday could cause more complications, and surgeons should be careful when the surgical starting time is midday.

After-hours esophagectomy may pose additional risk to patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of esophageal cancers (ECs) combined with fewer surgeons working at large centers will increase the likelihood of surgery for ECs being performed during later hours. This study aimed to compare esophagectomies' operative outcomes for EC performed at different surgical starting times. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum curve analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the potential change-point of surgical starting times. The participants were then divided into 2 groups according to the change-point time. Propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors between the 2 groups. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients who underwent potentially radical esophagectomy from 7 May 2014 to 31 December 2017 in our institute were included. The 3-year all-cause mortality showed a significant change-point at 16:42, with an increment from 56.5% to 76.9% (P=0.043). Esophagectomy that commenced between 17:00-18:59 was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) [multivariate hazard ratio (HR): 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 4.90; P=0.010] and disease-free survival (DFS) (multivariate HR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.21; P=0.028). The participants were allocated to the during-hours group and the after-hours group according to the change-point of 17:00. A total of 84 participants in the during-hours group were matched to 33 participants in the after-hours group. The median operative time was shorter in the after-hours group [309 (during-hours) vs. 239 (after-hours) minutes, P=0.014); the after-hours group had a greater incidence of respiratory complications (22.63% vs. 45.45%, P=0.023) and 90-day mortality (0 vs. 9.09%, P=0.021). The 5-year OS (P=0.042) and DFS (P=0.030) were significantly higher in the during-hours group. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomies started during after-hours are correlated with poorer surgical outcomes. It is recommended to cancel selective esophagectomies due to commence after 17:00.

Surgical starting time in the morning versus the afternoon: propensity score matched analysis of operative outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of colorectal cancer cases is increasing, and so the number of laparoscopic colectomy procedures being performed is also increasing, leading to an increased workload for surgeons. However, operating for prolonged time periods may cause surgeons to lose their concentration and develop fatigue. We hypothesized that there is a time-of-day variation in outcome for patients with colorectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic colectomy. The present study aimed to compare the operative outcome between laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer performed in the morning versus the afternoon. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study. All 1961 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between 2007 and 2017 were included; 1006 of these patients underwent morning surgery, while 955 underwent afternoon surgery. These patients were analyzed using propensity score matching, giving 791 patients in each group. The short- and long-term outcomes in both groups were compared. RESULTS: Before propensity score matching, the morning group had a larger mean tumor size than the afternoon group (30 cm vs 35 cm; P = 0.0035). After matching, the two groups did not significantly differ in any patient characteristics. Compared with the afternoon group, the morning group had a significantly lesser incidence of intra-operative organ injury (0.25% vs 1.13%; P = 0.027), and a significantly greater incidence of post-operative abdominal abscess (2.03% vs 0.75% P = 0.028). The incidences of other complications and morbidities were similar in both groups. The median operative time in the morning group (201 min) was significantly longer than that in the afternoon group (193 min; P = 0.0124). The two groups did not differ in 5-year overall survival rates and 5-year disease-free rates within any disease stage. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical start times are correlated with surgical outcomes. Our data will help to ensure the safest possible surgeries.