Perceived quality of life by patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with biological therapies. SACVINFA study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate health-related quality of life perceived by patients with the most prevalent immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in Spain: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis (Ps), psoriatic arthritis (AP), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and spondyloarthropathies (SpAs), and to determine the factors that influence patient quality of life. METHODS: The SACVINFA study (SA=satisfaction, CV=quality of life, IN=immune-mediated, FA=pharmacy) consisted of an observational study conducted in 4 hospitals in the Community of Madrid. A cross-sectional analysis was made for adult patients diagnosed with an immune-mediated inflammatory disease who attended the Pharmacy Service. Quality of life was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and specific questionnaires: SIBDQ-9, DLQI, PsAQoL, QoL-RA, and ASQoL. RESULTS: A total of 578 patients were analysed (inflammatory bowel disease=25.3%; psoriasis=19.7%; spondyloarthropathies=18.7%; rheumatoid arthritis=18.5%; psoriatic arthritis=17.8%). The mean age (standard deviation) was 49.8 (12.3) years and 50.7% were male. The average score (standard deviation) for the global EQ-5D-5L was 0.771 (0.2) and the mean (standard deviation) visual analogue scale score was 71.5 (20.0). Type of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases was associated with differences in quality of life showing psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease higher values of EQ5D-5L than psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and spondyloarthropathies, p<.05 in all comparisons. Patients with RA, IBD, and Ps achieved 70% of the maximum score, while patients with PsA and SpAs did not reach 50% of the maximum possible score. Female gender, a state of moderate/severe disease severity, an older age, and a higher number of previous treatments were correlated with worse quality of life. Conversely, persistence to current treatment correlated with better quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases have markedly affected quality of life, mainly in the pain/discomfort dimension, especially in those immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with a rheumatological component.

What drives the decision to optimise biological treatment in children and youngsters with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A discrete-choice experiment.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse factors involved in the decision to optimise biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. METHODS: A "discrete-choice" methodology was used. In a nominal group meeting, factors which may influence physicians' decisions to optimise biological dose were identified, together with decision nodes. 1000Minds® was used to create multiple fictitious clinical scenarios based on the factors identified, and to deploy surveys that were sent to a panel of experts. These experts decided for each item which of two clinical scenarios prompted them to optimise the dose of biologic. A conjoint analysis was carried out, and the partial-value functions and the weights of relative importance calculated. RESULTS: In the nominal group, three decision nodes were identified: (1) time to decide; (2) to maintain/reduce or prolong interval; (3) what drug to reduce. The factors elicited were different for each node and included patient and drug attributes. The presence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), systemic involvement, or subclinical inflammation made the decision easier (highest weights). The presence of joints of difficult control and year of debut influenced the decision in some but not all, and in different directions. Immunogenicity, adherence, and concomitant treatments were also aspects taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to optimise the dose of biological therapy in children and youngster can be divided into several nodes, and the factors, both patient and therapy-related, leading to the decision can be detailed. These decisions taken by experts may be transported to practice, study designs, and guidelines.

What drives the decision to optimise biological treatment in children and youngsters with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A discrete-choice experiment / Modelo de elección discreta para entender la decisión de optimizar los biológicos en la artritis idiopática juvenil

Objective: To analyse factors involved in the decision to optimise biologics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Methods: A “discrete-choice” methodology was used. In a nominal group meeting, factors which may influence physicians’ decisions to optimise biological dose were identified, together with decision nodes. 1000Minds® was used to create multiple fictitious clinical scenarios based on the factors identified, and to deploy surveys that were sent to a panel of experts. These experts decided for each item which of two clinical scenarios prompted them to optimise the dose of biologic. A conjoint analysis was carried out, and the partial-value functions and the weights of relative importance calculated. Results: In the nominal group, three decision nodes were identified: (1) time to decide; (2) to maintain/reduce or prolong interval; (3) what drug to reduce. The factors elicited were different for each node and included patient and drug attributes. The presence of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), systemic involvement, or subclinical inflammation made the decision easier (highest weights). The presence of joints of difficult control and year of debut influenced the decision in some but not all, and in different directions. Immunogenicity, adherence, and concomitant treatments were also aspects taken into account. Conclusions: The decision to optimise the dose of biological therapy in children and youngster can be divided into several nodes, and the factors, both patient and therapy-related, leading to the decision can be detailed. These decisions taken by experts may be transported to practice, study designs, and guidelines.(AU)

Objetivo: Analizar los factores que intervienen en la decisión de optimizar el biológico en la artritis idiopática juvenil. Métodos: Se utilizó la metodología de «elección discreta». Mediante grupo nominal se identificaron factores potencialmente influyentes en la decisión de optimizar la dosis de biológico y los nodos de decisión. Con 1000Minds® se crearon escenarios clínicos ficticios basados en los factores identificados que se mostraron en encuestas a un panel de expertos. Cada ítem de las encuestas mostraba 2 escenarios clínicos y los expertos elegían el que les llevaría a optimizar el biológico. Se realizó un análisis conjunto, calculándose las funciones de valor parcial y los pesos de importancia relativa. Resultados: Se identificaron 3 nodos de decisión: 1) dilatar decisión o no; 2) mantener/reducir o prolongar el intervalo; y 3) qué fármaco reducir. Los factores identificados varían por nodo e incluyen atributos del paciente y del fármaco. La presencia del síndrome de activación macrofágica, la afectación sistémica o la inflamación subclínica facilitaron la decisión (pesos más altos). La presencia de articulaciones de difícil control y el año de inicio influyeron en la decisión en algunos casos, pero no en todos, y en diferentes direcciones. La inmunogenicidad, la adherencia y los tratamientos concomitantes también fueron aspectos decisivos. Conclusiones: La decisión de optimizar la dosis de biológico en artritis idiopática juvenil se divide en varios nodos y se pueden detallar factores, tanto del paciente como del tratamiento, que determinan la decisión. Estas decisiones de experto pueden transportarse a la práctica, la investigación y las recomendaciones.(AU)

Migraine treatment with biological therapies. The state of the art / Tratamento da enxaqueca com terapias biológicas. O Estado da arte

Migraine is a highly prevalent and debilitating neurological disorder. Most patients do not receive a correct diagnosis and effective treatments. Apart of the few specialists and tertiary centers worldwide, the treatment of migraine is usually symptomatic and prevention, as well as treatments of the underlying mechanisms, are not aimed. It results in frustration and substantial burden. The last few years witnessed the releasing of specific biological therapies, mostly addressing one of the peptides involved in migraine pathophysiology, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Either the small molecules as well as the monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or its canonical receptor have been launched in markets across the globe and represent interesting options for the treatment of migraine. Onabotulinumtoxin A has also been proposed for chronic migraine as well, but not for episodic migraine, based on its unique ability to inhibit the SNARE complex formation and the release of numerous potential mediators of migraine. However, despite the favorable figures on efficacy and tolerability of these compounds, the regulations, and particulars of different countries, regarding the structures and reimbursement of medical care, demonstrated different adhesion profiles of chosen populations to receive these emerging weapons against migraine-imposed suffering. This review addresses the use and characteristics of biological therapies used in migraine treatment.

A enxaqueca é um distúrbio neurológico altamente prevalente e debilitante. A maioria dos pacientes não recebe um diagnóstico correto e tratamentos eficazes. Com exceção dos poucos especialistas e centros terciários em todo o mundo, o tratamento da enxaqueca é geralmente sintomático e a prevenção, bem como o tratamento dos mecanismos subjacentes, não são direcionados. Isso resulta em frustração e fardo substancial. Os últimos anos testemunharam o lançamento de terapias biológicas específicas, abordando principalmente um dos peptídeos envolvidos na fisiopatologia da enxaqueca, o peptídeo relacionado ao gene da calcitonina (CGRP). Tanto as pequenas moléculas como os anticorpos monoclonais contra CGRP ou o seu receptor canônico foram lançados em mercados em todo o mundo e representam opções interessantes para o tratamento da enxaqueca. A onabotulinumtoxina A também foi proposta para enxaqueca crônica, mas não para enxaqueca episódica, com base em sua capacidade única de inibir a formação do complexo SNARE e a liberação de numerosos mediadores potenciais da enxaqueca. No entanto, apesar dos números favoráveis ​​sobre a eficácia e tolerabilidade destes compostos, os regulamentos e particularidades de diferentes países, no que diz respeito às estruturas e reembolso dos cuidados médicos, demonstraram diferentes perfis de adesão das populações escolhidas para receber estas armas emergentes contra o sofrimento imposto pela enxaqueca. Esta revisão aborda o uso e as características das terapias biológicas utilizadas no tratamento da enxaqueca.

Evaluación del dolor en pacientes con patologías reumáticas entratamiento con terapias biológicas / Assessment of pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment

Fundamento: El objetivo fue evaluar el dolor en pacientes con patologías reumáticas en tratamiento con terapias biológicas. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo, de pacientes con enfermedad reumatológica tratada con terapias biológicas, atendidos en consulta externa en febrero/agosto de 2020. Se recogieron variables demográficas (sexo y edad), clínicas (diagnóstico, presencia de dolor, intensidad y localización) y farmacológicas (terapia biológica, tratamiento concomitante con FAME tradicionales, y tratamiento analgésico). Las fuentes de información utilizadas fueron la historia clínica electrónica y Farmatools Dominion®. Resultados: Se incluyeron 138 pacientes, con edad media 56 años, 71% mujeres. El diagnóstico más frecuente fue espondilitis anquilosante (47%). El fármaco biológico más utilizado fue anti TNF-α (64%) y el 60,1% recibían fármacos tradicionales, especialmente metotrexato y leflunomida (51,8 y 28,9%). El 81% de los pacientes presentaban dolor, especialmente en manos (73,2%) y rodillas (69,6%), de intensidad media 6,5 en la escala EVA. El 84,8% de los pacientes no tenía el dolor controlado (EVA >4) y era severo o muy severo en el 67,9% de los pacientes, a pesar de que el 83,3% tenían pautado tratamiento antiálgico, el 52,2% con más de un fármaco, con antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) (60%), paracetamol (52,2%) y opioides (56,5%). El dolor se controló mejor con AINE (14,5%) que con opioides (8,3%); en un 29,6% el dolor no mejoraba con el tratamiento. El número de fármacos aumentó con la intensidad del dolor (rho = 0,264; p = 0,006). Conclusiones: Más del 69% de los pacientes presentaba dolor no controlado y severo, reflejando el desafío que supone instaurar un tratamiento efectivo para el dolor.(AU)

Background: To assess pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment. Methods. Observational retrospective study of patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment who visited the health care center as outpatients in February/August 2020. We collected demographic (sex and age), clinical (diagnosis, pain presence, intensity, and location), and pharmacological (biological therapy, concomitant treatment with traditional DMARDs, and analgesic treatment) variables from the electronic medical records and Farmatools Dominion®. Results: We included 138 patients; mean age was 56 years and 71% were female. The most frequent diagnosis (47%) was ankylosing spondylitis. Anti-TNF-α was the most prescribed biological drug (64%); 60.1% of study patients received traditional drugs, particularly methotrexate and leflunomide (51.8 and 28.9%, respectively). Pain was reported in 81% of the cases, particularly in hands (73.2%) and knees (69.6%); mean pain intensity was 6.5 (VAS). Although 83.3% of the patients had been prescribed analgesics, pain persisted in 84.8% of the cases (VAS >4), being severe or very severe in 67.9%. Over half of the patients (52.2%) used more than one analgesic. The most frequently prescribed medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (60%), paracetamol (52.2%), and opioids (56.5%). NSAIDs controlled pain (14.5%) better than opioids (8.3%); there was no post-treatment improvement of pain in 29.6% of the patients. The number of prescribed drugs increased with pain intensity (rho = 0.264; p = 0.006). Conclusion. Almost 70% of study patients had uncontrolled severe rheumatic-related pain. This implies a challenge for establishing effective treatments for this type of pain.(AU)

Is there a real risk of bacterial infection in patients receiving targeted and biological therapies?

Over the past decades, the advent of targeted and biological therapies has revolutionized the management of cancer and autoimmune, hematological and inflammatory conditions. Although a large amount of information is now available on the risk of opportunistic infections associated with some of these agents, the evidence regarding the susceptibility to bacterial infections is more limited. Biological agents have been shown to entail a variable risk of bacterial infections in pivotal randomized clinical trials and post-marketing studies. Recommendations on risk minimization strategies and therapeutic interventions are therefore scarce and often based on expert opinion, with only a few clear statements for some particular agents (i.e. meningococcal vaccination for patients receiving eculizumab). In the present review the available information regarding the incidence of and risk factors for bacterial infection associated with the use of different groups of biological agents is summarized according to their mechanisms of action, and recommendations based on this evidence are provided. Additional information coming from clinical research and real-world studies is required to address unmet questions in this emerging field.

Rapidity of clinical response to adalimumab and improvement of quality of life in luminal Crohn's disease: RAPIDA study / Rapidez de la respuesta clínica a adalimumab y mejora de la calidad de vida en la enfermedad de Crohn luminal: estudio RAPIDA

Objective: No studies evaluating the rapidity of response to biological therapies are available for Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate rapidity of onset of clinical response and impact on quality of life (QoL) of adalimumab therapy in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.Patients and methods: RAPIDA was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients with moderately-to-severely active luminal CD, anti-TNF-naïve, and unresponsive to conventional therapy were treated with adalimumab. Clinical disease activity, QoL and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at day 4, and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after treatment initiation. Results: Eighty-six patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Clinical disease activity was reduced from a median of 9.0 points to 6.0 points at day 4. Clinical response (≥ 3-point reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HBI) was achieved by 61.6% (d4) and 75.6% (w1) of patients in the ITT population (median 2.5 days) and with non-responder imputation (NRI), by 55.8% and 53.4%, respectively. The proportion of patients in clinical remission (HBI<5) at weeks 2 and 4 in the ITT population was 54.7% and 62.8%, respectively (median 7.0 days), and 38.4% and 45.3% in the NRI population. All QoL scores significantly improved and inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased from day 4 onwards (p<0.0001).Conclusion: Rapid clinical response and remission, improvement in QoL and fatigue, and a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers were achieved with adalimumab as early as day 4 in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD. (AU)

Objetivo: No hay estudios que evalúen la rapidez de la respuesta a las terapias biológicas en la enfermedad de Crohn (EC). El objetivo fue evaluar la rapidez del inicio de la respuesta clínica y el impacto en la calidad de vida (CdV) de la terapia con adalimumab en pacientes adultos con EC moderada-grave. Pacientes y métodos: RAPIDA fue un ensayo clínico abierto, de un solo brazo, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se trató con adalimumab a pacientes adultos con EC luminal activa moderada-grave, sin tratamiento previo con anti-TNF y sin respuesta a terapia convencional. Se midieron la actividad clínica de la enfermedad, la CdV y los biomarcadores inflamatorios el día 4 y las semanas 1, 2, 4 y 12 tras el tratamiento.Resultados: Se incluyeron 86 pacientes en los análisis por intención de tratar (IdT). La actividad clínica de la enfermedad se redujo de una mediana de 9,0 a 6,0 puntos en el día 4. La respuesta clínica (reducción ≥3 puntos en el Índice Harvey-Bradshaw, IHB) se dio en un 61,4% (d4) y un 75,6% (s1) de los pacientes IdT y en un 55,8% y un 53,4% con imputación de no respondedores (INR). La proporción de pacientes IdT en remisión clínica (IHB<5) en las s2 y s4 fue de 54,7% y 62,8%, respectivamente, y 38,4% y 45,3% en la población INR. Todas las puntuaciones de CdV mejoraron significativamente y los biomarcadores inflamatorios disminuyeron significativamente desde el día 4 (p<0,0001).Conclusiones: Se logró una rápida respuesta clínica y remisión, mejoría en la CdV y fatiga, y una reducción de los biomarcadores inflamatorios en los pacientes tratados con adalimumab ya en el día 4. (AU)

Rapidity of clinical response to adalimumab and improvement of quality of life in luminal Crohn's disease: RAPIDA study.

OBJECTIVE: No studies evaluating the rapidity of response to biological therapies are available for Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of this study was to evaluate rapidity of onset of clinical response and impact on quality of life (QoL) of adalimumab therapy in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: RAPIDA was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Adult patients with moderately-to-severely active luminal CD, anti-TNF-naïve, and unresponsive to conventional therapy were treated with adalimumab. Clinical disease activity, QoL and inflammatory biomarkers were measured at day 4, and weeks 1, 2, 4, and 12 after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. Clinical disease activity was reduced from a median of 9.0 points to 6.0 points at day 4. Clinical response (≥ 3-point reduction in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, HBI) was achieved by 61.6% (d4) and 75.6% (w1) of patients in the ITT population (median 2.5 days) and with non-responder imputation (NRI), by 55.8% and 53.4%, respectively. The proportion of patients in clinical remission (HBI<5) at weeks 2 and 4 in the ITT population was 54.7% and 62.8%, respectively (median 7.0 days), and 38.4% and 45.3% in the NRI population. All QoL scores significantly improved and inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased from day 4 onwards (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rapid clinical response and remission, improvement in QoL and fatigue, and a reduction of inflammatory biomarkers were achieved with adalimumab as early as day 4 in adult anti-TNF-naïve patients with moderately-to-severely active CD.

Características epidemiológicas y eventos adversos de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica en tratamiento con terapias biológicas en Galicia / Epidemiological Characteristics and Adverse Events of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Undergoing Treatment with Biological Therapies in Galicia

Los pacientes con formas graves de artritis psoriásica (APs) habitualmente requieren tratamiento con agentes biológicos. Un mayor conocimiento de este subgrupo de pacientes permite una mejor toma de decisiones en la práctica clínica real. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo, multicéntrico. Se incluyó a todos los pacientes mayores de 16 años diagnosticados de APs en tratamiento con terapias biológicas desde el 1 de enero de 2011 hasta el 31 de diciembre del 2015. Resultados: Recibieron terapias biológicas 604 pacientes con APs. El etanercept fue el tratamiento más utilizado. En su mayoría eran pacientes con el subtipo periférico y cumplían criterios de remisión clínica. Un 32% presentaba HLA-B27 positivo, que se asociaba a subtipos de APs axial. La prevalencia de tuberculosis tratada previa fue del 5,9% y el 23% de los pacientes recibió quimioprofilaxis por tuberculosis latente. Tuvieron sustitución protésica 24 pacientes. La prótesis de cadera fue la más frecuente. Fueron tratados por trastornos afectivos 94 casos. El diagnóstico de fibromialgia fue establecido en 11, mayormente en mujeres. El 6,6% de los casos tuvieron episodios de infecciones graves; las infecciones respiratorias fueron las más frecuentes. Se detectaron 16 tumores (2,9%). El cáncer de próstata y los tumores ginecológicos fueron los más frecuentes. Al igual que ocurría con las infecciones, a mayor edad, mayor riesgo de presentar tumor. Conclusiones:Describimos las características epidemiológicas y de seguridad en vida real de una cohorte multicéntrica gallega de pacientes con APs en tratamiento biológico.(AU)

Patients with severe forms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) usually require treatment with biological agents. A greater knowledge of this subgroup of patients and their treatment enables better decision making in real clinical practice.MethodsLongitudinal, multicentric observational study. We included all patients older than 16 years diagnosed with PsA in treatment with biological therapies from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015 treated in 6 Galician hospitals. Results: Six hundred and fourpatients with PsA received biological therapies. Etanercept was the most used biological treatment. The average time of follow-up was 2.5 years and 67.9% were being treated with the first biological treatment. They were mostly patients with the peripheral subtype and met the criteria for clinical remission. Thirty-two percent had positive HLA-B27 and it was associated with axial PA subtypes. The prevalence of tuberculosis treated previously was 5.9%, and 23% of patients received chemoprophylaxis for latent tuberculosis. Twenty-four patients had undergone a prosthetic replacement. Hip prosthesis was the most frequent. Ninety-nine cases were treated for affective disorders. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia was established in 11 cases mostly women. Of the cases, 6.6% had episodes of serious infections, with respiratory infections being the most frequent. Sixteen tumours were detected (2.9%). Prostate cancer and gynaecological tumours were the most frequent. As with infections, the greater the age the greater the risk of presenting a tumour. Conclusions: We describe the epidemiological and safety characteristics in real life of a Galician multicentre cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis under biological treatment.(AU)

[Adherence to biological therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. (Study ADhER-1)]. / Adherencia terapéutica a fármacos biológicos en pacientes con artritis reumatoide, artritis psoriásica y espondilitis anquilosante. (Estudio ADhER-1).

BACKGROUND: To quantify adherence to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) and to determine the factors that can predict adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis in daily clinical practice. METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and single-center study was carried out. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis who were in treatment with subcutaneous biological DMARD were included. Variables related to socioeconomic status, disease, biological therapy and safety were recorded. Adherence was calculated by using medication possession ratio, Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale Questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients and 6 different biological DMARDs were included. Mean age was 56.8±13.2 years and 52.7% were women. The percentage of adherent patients was 59.3% in rheumatoid arthritis, 62.5% in psoriatic arthritis and 76.2% in ankylosing spondylitis. Lesser adherence was associated with the administration of the drug by a family member and/or caregiver (odds ratio: 9.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-61.8 (p <.05)). There were no differences between adherent and non-adherent patients in terms of the biological DMARD used. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in adherence to biological therapies among patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies. Adherence correlates negatively with administration of biological DMARD by a family member and / or caregiver.

Epidemiological Characteristics and Adverse Events of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Undergoing Treatment with Biological Therapies in Galicia. / Características epidemiológicas y eventos adversos de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica en tratamiento con terapias biológicas en Galicia.

Patients with severe forms of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) usually require treatment with biological agents. A greater knowledge of this subgroup of patients and their treatment enables better decision making in real clinical practice. METHODS: Longitudinal, multicentric observational study. We included all patients older than 16 years diagnosed with PsA in treatment with biological therapies from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015 treated in 6 Galician hospitals. RESULTS: Six hundred and fourpatients with PsA received biological therapies. Etanercept was the most used biological treatment. The average time of follow-up was 2.5 years and 67.9% were being treated with the first biological treatment. They were mostly patients with the peripheral subtype and met the criteria for clinical remission. Thirty-two percent had positive HLA-B27 and it was associated with axial PA subtypes. The prevalence of tuberculosis treated previously was 5.9%, and 23% of patients received chemoprophylaxis for latent tuberculosis. Twenty-four patients had undergone a prosthetic replacement. Hip prosthesis was the most frequent. Ninety-nine cases were treated for affective disorders. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia was established in 11 cases mostly women. Of the cases, 6.6% had episodes of serious infections, with respiratory infections being the most frequent. Sixteen tumours were detected (2.9%). Prostate cancer and gynaecological tumours were the most frequent. As with infections, the greater the age the greater the risk of presenting a tumour. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the epidemiological and safety characteristics in real life of a Galician multicentre cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis under biological treatment.

Is there a real risk of bacterial infection in patients receiving targeted and biological therapies?

Over the past decades, the advent of targeted and biological therapies has revolutionized the management of cancer and autoimmune, hematological and inflammatory conditions. Although a large amount of information is now available on the risk of opportunistic infections associated with some of these agents, the evidence regarding the susceptibility to bacterial infections is more limited. Biological agents have been shown to entail a variable risk of bacterial infections in pivotal randomized clinical trials and post-marketing studies. Recommendations on risk minimization strategies and therapeutic interventions are therefore scarce and often based on expert opinion, with only a few clear statements for some particular agents (i.e. meningococcal vaccination for patients receiving eculizumab). In the present review the available information regarding the incidence of and risk factors for bacterial infection associated with the use of different groups of biological agents is summarized according to their mechanisms of action, and recommendations based on this evidence are provided. Additional information coming from clinical research and real-world studies is required to address unmet questions in this emerging field.

Fungal infections following treatment with monoclonal antibodies and other immunomodulatory therapies.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a proinflammatory cytokine involved in a wide range of important physiologic processes and has a pathologic role in some diseases. TNF antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept) are effective in treating inflammatory conditions. Antilymphocyte biological agents (rituximab, alemtuzumab), integrin antagonists (natalizumab, etrolizumab and vedolizumab), interleukin (IL)-17A blockers (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and IL-2 antagonists (daclizumab, basiliximab) are widely used after transplantation and for gastroenterological, rheumatological, dermatological, neurological and hematological disorders. Given the putative role of these host defense elements against bacterial, viral and fungal agents, the risk of infection during a treatment with these antagonists is a concern. Fungal infections, both opportunistic and endemic, have been associated with these biological therapies, but the causative relationship is unclear, especially among patients with poor control of their underlying disease or who are undergoing steroid therapy. Potential recipients of these drugs should be screened for latent endemic fungal infections. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis could be useful for preventing Pneumocystis jirovecii infection in patients over 65 years of age who are taking TNF antagonists, antilymphocyte biological agents or who have lymphopenia and are undergoing concomitant steroid therapy. As with other immunosuppressant drugs, TNF antagonists and antilymphocyte antibodies should be discontinued for patients with active infectious disease.

Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte II: Guía clínica chilena de Prevención de Infecciones Asociadas al Uso de Terapias Biológicas (PREVITEB) / Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies. Screening of hepatitis B in high risk Chilean and immigrant pregnant women: Management of mother to child transmission Second part: Chilean Guidelines for Prevention of Infections associated to use of Biological Therapies (PREVITEB)

Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre éstas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta segunda parte corresponde a la guía clínica que detalla estas recomendaciones mediante estrategias de cribado, terapias profilácticas e indicación de vacunas, según corresponde, para infecciones bacterianas, y por micobacterias en particular, virus, hongos y parásitos, tanto para adultos como para niños.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of 2 manuscripts. This second part is a guideline that details these recommendations through screening strategies, prophylactic therapies and vaccines indications for bacterial, mycobacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections, both for adults and children.

Cartílago de tiburón: una panacea oncológica más / Shark cartilage: another oncological panacea

Resumen El cáncer es la tercera causa de muerte después de las enfermedades cardiovasculares y diabetes (mellitus); ante tan desolador panorama epidemiológico, es esperable que surjan multitud de terapias "curativas" no convencionales, biológicas y no biológicas. Entre las terapias biológicas se encuentra el cartílago de tiburón, cuyos defensores de su consumo se basan en la falsa premisa de que "los tiburones no tienen cáncer", y cuando son confrontados, alegan teorías conspiranoicas. Aunque se ha demostrado la existencia de un factor inhibidor de angiogénesis en el producto, los ensayos clínicos no han sido concluyentes en cuanto a un efecto benéfico neto en pacientes oncológicos. Pero el mercadeo popular de la sustancia es un negocio de varios millones de dólares anuales. Es prudente que los médicos tengan conocimiento incluso de los posibles efectos colaterales para proporcionar información a los pacientes.

Abstract Cancer is the third cause of death after cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. In the face of such a devastating epidemiological panorama, it is expected that a multitude of non-conventional, biological and non-biological "curative" therapies will emerge. Among the biological therapies is the shark cartilage, whose defenders of its use are based on the false premise that "sharks do not have cancer", and when confronted, they claim conspiracy theories. Although the presence of an inhibitory factor of angiogenesis in the product has been demonstrated, clinical trials have not been conclusive as to a net beneficial effect in oncological patients. But the popular marketing of the substance is a business of several million dollars a year. It is prudent that doctors have knowledge, including possible side effects, to provide information to patients.

Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients who are Candidate for Biological Therapies in Spain? A Multidisciplinary Survey. / ¿Cómo realizamos el cribado de infección tuberculosa latente en pacientes candidatos a terapias biológicas en España? Una encuesta multidisciplinar.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with biological therapies increases the incidence of tuberculous disease. The introduction of systematic screening for latent tuberculosis infection in patients who are to receive these therapies has reduced this risk. In 2016, the consensus document on the prevention and treatment of tuberculosis in patients who are candidates for biological treatment was published in Spain. The main objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to these guidelines. METHODS: Multicenter, descriptive, observational study via an anonymous online survey sent to medical societies involved in biologics. RESULTS: We received 747 responses. Most respondents performed screening at the right time in the right patients (93.7%). Only 36.6% of respondents requested the appropriate diagnostic test, while 56.3% correctly recommended chemoprophylaxis. Up to 96% were familiar with the recommended chemoprophylaxis regimens, while only 63.9% initiated them at the right time. The specialist area that participated most and screened most patients for latent tuberculosis infection was rheumatology (54%). In most cases, pulmonologists were involved in an advisory capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows poor overall adherence to recommendations, with only 56% of respondents reporting appropriate compliance. The incidence of tuberculous disease in patients who are to receive biological therapies could be reduced further by emphasizing the importance of the right diagnostic test and use of the diagnostic algorithm for latent tuberculosis infection.

Prevention and treatment of tuberculosis infection in candidates for biologic therapy: A multidisciplinary consensus statement adapted to the dermatology patient. / Consenso multidisciplinar sobre prevención y tratamiento de la tuberculosis en pacientes candidatos a tratamiento biológico. Adaptación al paciente dermatológico.

Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases being treated with immunosuppressive drugs, and with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in particular, have an increased risk of infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection and preventive therapy to reduce the risk of progression to active tuberculosis are mandatory in this group of patients. This updated multidisciplinary consensus document presents the latest expert opinions on the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis in candidates for biologic therapy and establishes recommendations based on current knowledge relating to the use of biologic agents.

HIV-Associated Psoriasis. / Psoriasis asociada al VIH.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence is increasing worldwide as people on antiretroviral therapy are living longer. These patients are often susceptible to debilitating inflammatory disorders that are frequently refractory to standard treatment. Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disorder, associated with both physical and psychological burden, and can be the presenting feature of HIV infection. In this population, psoriasis tends to be more severe, to have atypical presentations and higher failure rates with the usual prescribed treatments. Management of moderate and severe HIV-associated psoriasis is challenging. Systemic conventional and biologic agents may be considered, but patients should be carefully followed up for potential adverse events, like opportunist infections, and regular monitoring of CD4 counts and HIV viral loads.

Aproximación de discapacidad en artritis reumatoide. Resultados de un programa de atención integral / Approach to disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a comprehensive care program

Resumen Introducción: Los modelos de atención en artritis reumatoide consideran el abordaje sintomático y la intervención de discapacidad; sin embargo, es importante un modelo que integre los avances en el manejo farmacológico y las estrategias no farmacológicas. Materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo, transversal, en el que incluimos a 640 pacientes con diagnóstico de artritis reumatoide que estaban participando en un programa de atención integral ambulatoria; tomamos las primeras valoraciones realizadas por terapia ocupacional con la evaluación funcional completa que incluían: índice de Barthel, escala Quick DASH y Health Assessment Questionnaire. El nivel de actividad de la enfermedad se calculó a través del DAS28. Resultados: Se evidenciaron puntuaciones más altas del HAQ a medida que el nivel de actividad de la enfermedad aumenta; no se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto al nivel de actividad de la enfermedad entre los sujetos que laboran y los que no. Encontramos una baja asociación entre el DAS28 y el Quick DASH en sus 2 módulos de evaluación (r = 0,399 para el instrumental y r = 0,291 para el módulo laboral; p < 0,005). De los 350 sujetos, el 66,7% presentó algún grado de actividad de la enfermedad y el porcentaje de pacientes que calificaron una limitación de moderada a severa en la función de su extremidad superior fue del 66,1% para el módulo laboral y del 84,75% para el módulo instrumental, con mayor limitación funcional a medida que aumenta el nivel de actividad de la enfermedad. Conclusiones: Este estudio ha permitido reevaluar dentro del programa la aplicación de escalas genéricas que abordan de forma general la funcionalidad.

Abstract Introduction: Although rheumatoid arthritis care models consider a symptomatic approach and intervention of disability, it is also important to have a model that integrates advances in the pharmacological management, as well as non-drug treatment strategies. Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted that included 640 patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and in an outpatient comprehensive care program. The first assessments made by occupational therapy with a full functional evaluation including the Barthel index, Quick DASH scale, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire. The activity of the disease was calculated using DAS28. Results: Higher HAQ scores were observed as the level of disease activity increased. There were no significant differences in the level of activity of the disease among subjects who worked and those who did not. A low correlation was found between the DAS28 and the Quick DASH in 2 evaluation modules (r=.399 for instrumental and r=.291 for the work module) (P<.005). Of the 350 subjects, 66.7% had some degree of disease activity and the percentage of patients shown to have a moderate to severe limitation in the functioning of the upper limb was 66.1% for the work module and 84.75% for the instrumental module, showing a greater functional limitation as the level of disease activity increased. Conclusion: This study has reassessed the applying of generic scales that deal with generally functionality, within the care program.