A comparative assessment of ACS NSQIP-predicted and actual surgical risk outcomes of robotic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma resection at a high volume institution.

Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence is increasing in Western nations. There has been a shift toward minimally invasive approaches for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE). This study compares the outcomes of robotic THE for esophageal adenocarcinoma resection at our institution with the predicted metrics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we prospectively followed 83 patients who underwent robotic THE from 2012 to 2023. Predicted outcomes were determined using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. Our outcomes were compared with these predicted outcomes and with general outcomes for transhiatal esophagectomy reported in ACS NSQIP, which includes a mix of surgical approaches. The median age of patients was 70 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 kg/m2 and a male prevalence of 82%. The median length of stay was 7 days. The rates of any complications and in-hospital mortality were 16% and 5%, respectively. Seven patients (8%) were readmitted within a 30-day postoperative window. The median survival is anticipated to surpass 95 months. Our outcomes were generally aligned with or surpassed the predicted ACS NSQIP metrics. The extended median survival of over 95 months highlights the potential effectiveness of robotic THE in the resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Further exploration into its long-term survival benefits and outcomes is warranted, along with studies that provide a more direct comparison between robotic and other surgical approaches.

Novel reconstruction using pedicled ileocolic interposition with intrathoracic esophago-ileal anastomosis after distal esophagectomy for esophagogastric junction cancer: A report of two cases.

There is no optimal reconstruction after radical distal esophagectomy for cancers of the esophagogastric junction. We designed a novel reconstruction technique using pedicled ileocolic interposition with intrathoracic anastomosis between the esophagus and the elevated ileum. Two patients underwent the surgery. Case 1 was a 70-year-old man with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with 3 cm of esophageal invasion. Case 2 was a 70-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction; the epicenter of which was located just at the junction. These two patients underwent radical distal esophagectomy and pedicled ileocolic interposition with intrathoracic anastomosis. They were discharged on postoperative days 17 and 14, respectively, with no major complication. Pedicled ileocolic interposition is characterized by sufficient elevation and perfusion of the ileum, which is fed by the ileocolic artery and vein. As a result, we can generally adapt this reconstruction method to most curable esophagogastric junction cancers.

Robot-Assisted-Minimally Invasive-Transhiatal Esophagectomy (RAMI-THE).

The authors review the development and steps of the robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Key goals of the robot-assisted approach have been to address some of the concerns raised about the technical challenges with the traditional open transhiatal esophagectomy while keeping most of the steps consistent with the open approach.

The effects of smoking history on robotic transhiatal esophagectomy patient outcomes.

Esophageal resection for the treatment of esophageal cancer generally entails high rates of morbidity and mortality. Patients with a smoking history have increased post-operative complications following esophagectomy. This study was undertaken to determine how smoking or a history of smoking can affect perioperative outcomes and morbidity following robotic transhiatal esophagectomy. 75 patients were prospectively followed and divided; 44 patients actively smoking or with a history of significant smoking were classified as 'smokers', while the other 31 patients were classified as 'non-smokers'. Significance was determined at a p-value of ≤ 0.05 and data are presented as median (mean ± SD). 'Smokers' averaged 70(70 ± 7.8) years, 89% male, with 82% undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. 'Nonsmokers' averaged 68(69 ± 7.8) years, 74% male, and 74% receiving neoadjuvant therapy. BMI and ASA class showed no significant difference between the cohorts. 'Smokers' had an operative time of 341(343 ± 91.0) minutes and a blood loss of 150(191 ± 140.0) mL; 'nonsmokers' had 291(298 ± 65.9) minutes and 100(140 ± 120.9) mL, respectively (p = 0.02 for operative time). Tumor size and AJCC staging were similar for both cohorts. No significant differences were noted in postoperative complications, Clavien-Dindo score ≥ III, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, or 30-day readmissions. Survival rates were comparable. Hospital costs for 'smokers' were $33,131(41,091 ± 23,465.17) and $34,896 (62,154 ± 65,839.53) for 'nonsmokers' (p = 0.05). Profit/loss was $-23,155 (- 15,137 ± 35,819.29) for smokers and $-23,720 (- 16,716 ± 50,864.64) for nonsmokers. Current or past 'smokers' had longer operative times and lower costs following robotic transhiatal esophagectomy, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or survival compared to 'non-smokers'.

Left-primary & right-auxiliary operation mode in mediastinoscope-assisted radical esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) is the most minimally invasive esophagectomy procedure. It is a more challenging procedure and more difficult to be popularized than thoracoscopic surgery. We developed a new MATHE operation mode that provides a clearer visual field and makes the procedures simpler. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with esophageal cancer were divided into a control group (n = 29) and a study group (n = 51). The control group underwent classic MATHE, while the study group received modified MATHE. We compared the two groups on operation time; intraoperative blood loss; blood transfusion amount; incidence rate of lung infection, recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) injury, chylothorax, and anastomotic leakage; and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection. RESULTS: The study group was significantly better than the control group in operation time (271.78 min vs. 322.90 min, p < 0.05), intraoperative blood loss (48.63 mL vs. 68.97 mL, p < 0.05), and left paratracheal lymph node (No. 4L) dissection rate (88.24% vs. 24.14%, p < 0.01). No significant differences were identified in the incidence rate of anastomotic leakage, lung complications, or RLNs injury between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The modified MATHE is easier to perform. Modified MATHE is significantly superior to classic MATHE in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and upper mediastinal lymph node dissection rate.

Transhiatal esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy versus sweet for T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare transhiatal esophagectomy via mediastinoscopy (TEM) with Sweet procedure for patients with T2 midpiece and distal esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: By virtue of propensity score matching, 42 T2 ESCC patients who underwent TEM (n = 21) and Sweet procedure (n = 21) were included. Both the short-term and long-term outcomes of these patients were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the Sweet procedure, the TEM procedure showed less operation time (133.8 ± 30.4 vs 171.2 ± 30.3 min, p = 0.038), reduced drainage volume in 24 h (83.8 ± 142.3 vs 665.2 ± 220.0 mL, p < 0.001), shorter reserving time of chest tube (26.2 ± 26.3 vs 82.8 ± 49.8 h, p < 0.001) and less dissected lymph nodes (12.4 ± 6.1 vs 17.0 ± 6.5, p = 0.041). The average survival period was 62.6 months for TEM group and 62.5 months for Sweet group (p = 0.753). The COX regression showed that the nodal staging could be regarded as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.013), not the surgical method (p = 0. 754). CONCLUSIONS: The TEM procedure could reduce operative trauma compared with the Sweet procedure. The long-term survival rate of TEM group was acceptable. The lymph node resection was a major disadvantage of TEM procedure. The TEM procedure might be an alternate choice for T2 midpiece and distal ESCC patients, especially for patients who cannot tolerate transthoracic esophagectomy.

Post-esophagectomy Anastomosis Leak: A 10-Year Experience at a Specialized Center for Cancer Surgeries in Pakistan.

Esophageal cancer has been reported to be the seventh most common cancer and the sixth most common cause of mortality. Use of advanced diagnostic techniques has increased the detection of preoperative metastases and resulted in better patient selection for further management by curative surgery. We carried out a study to evaluate the outcome of esophagectomy at our institute in terms of acute leak, mortality and hospital stay. We also looked at various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors contributing to leak after esophagectomy. We evaluated 589 patients during the period from January 2009 to December 2019. All these patients underwent elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer at our hospital. Out of these, leak was seen in 30 patients (5.1%). We found no statistically significant difference when evaluating patient and tumour characteristics of patients who developed leak against those who did not. We also didn't find any significant difference in intraoperative or postoperative factors between the two groups. Proper preoperative evaluation and optimization are necessary to overcome various patient co-morbidities. On the basis of our study we conclude that when performed in high-volume centers with an adequately trained multi-disciplinary team approach, esophagectomy for carcinoma has a good outcome.

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Followed by Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer in Patients with Previous Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

During pancreaticoduodenectomy after transhiatal esophagectomy, the preservation of the blood supply to the gastric conduit is technically difficult due to adhesion. Here, we present a case of successful pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a patient with pancreatic head cancer who previously underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction for esophageal cancer. A 69-year-old man who had undergone cholecystectomy 20 years prior and transhiatal esophagectomy 6 years prior for esophageal cancer presented to our hospital for indigestion. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 2.8-cm pancreatic head cancer, with focal abutment with the gastroduodenal artery, right gastroepiploic artery, and right colic vein. After discussion with the multidisciplinary team, the patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with six cycles of FOFIRINOX. The patient successfully underwent pancreatectomy, which preserved the pylorus. We preserved the gap between the gastric tube and the left lateral segment of the liver to avoid injuring the right gastric artery and vein. The tumor was found to be invading the gastroduodenal artery; thus, we performed R0 resection of the gastroduodenal artery and an end-to-end anastomosis between the gastroduodenal artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. After completing the surgical procedure, we added Braun anastomosis to reduce the incidence of delayed gastric emptying. Pancreaticoduodenectomy after transhiatal esophagectomy can be performed with preservation of the blood supply to the neogastric tube by reconstructing the major vessels, even in cases in which the tumor is invading or abutting the major vessels.

Short-term outcome for high-risk patients after esophagectomy.

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for esophageal cancer facilitates mediastinal dissection; however, it has a significant impact on cardiopulmonary status. High-risk patients may therefore be better candidates for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in order to prevent serious complications. This study addressed short-term outcome following TTE and THE in patients that are considered to have a higher risk of surgery-related morbidity. This population-based study included patients who underwent a curative esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. The Charlson comorbidity index was used to assign patients to a low-risk (score ≤ 1) and high-risk group (score ≥ 2). Propensity score matching was applied to produce comparable groups between high-risk patients receiving TTE and THE. Primary endpoint was mortality (in-hospital/30-day mortality), secondary endpoints included morbidity and oncological outcomes. Additionally, a matched subgroup analysis was performed, including only cervical reconstructions. Of 5,438 patients, 945 and 431 high-risk patients underwent TTE and THE, respectively. After propensity score matching, mortality (6.3 vs 3.3%, P = 0.050), overall morbidity, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications and re-interventions were significantly more observed after TTE compared to THE. A significantly higher mortality after TTE with a cervical reconstruction was found compared to THE (7.0 vs. 2.2%, P = 0.020). Patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index predispose for a complicated postoperative course after esophagectomy, this was more outspoken after TTE compared to THE. In daily practice, these outcomes should be balanced with the lower lymph node yield, but comparable positive node count and radicality after THE.

Perioperative Clinical Results of Transcervical and Transhiatal Esophagectomy versus Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Background: This study assessed the efficacy of transcervical and transhiatal esophagectomy versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). Methods: A total of 80 patients with EC were enrolled in this study, including 40 cases in the observation group that received transcervical combine transhiatal esophagectomy and the rest 40 cases of the group that underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed between the two surgeries, regarding perioperative bleeding, the total number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes, operative time, number of lymph nodes in the left para-recurrent laryngeal nerve (para-RLN) or the right para-RLN, time in the intensive care unit (ICU), postoperative pain score, the length of postoperative stay (LOPS), PO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (PO2/FiO2), pulmonary infection, and lymphatic metastasis. Results: The operations were successfully performed in all 80 patients. The results showed that patients who underwent transcervical and transhiatal esophagectomy had shorter operations than those with transthoracic esophagectomy (200 minutes vs 235 minutes, Kruskal-Wallis test [Z] = -3.700, P < 0.001). The number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes in the left para-RLN in the observation group was higher than in the control group (25.0% vs 2.5%, Z = 2.568, P = 0.010). The postoperative pain score day 1 (0.0% vs 17.5%, Z = -4.292, P < 0.001), postoperative pain score day 3 (12.5% vs 37.5%, Z = -3.363, P < 0.001) and 48-h PO2/FiO2 (290 minutes vs 255 minutes, Z = 3.747, P < 0.001) were significant between the two groups. The LOPS of patients with EC in the observation group was shorter than the control group (7 vs 8, Z = -2.119, P = 0.034). The number of patients receiving transcervical and transhiatal esophagectomy that developed postoperative pulmonary infections was less than the controls (chi-square [χ 2] = 4.114, P = 0.043). Moreover, the transcervical and transhiatal esophagectomy was an independent protect factor for postoperative pulmonary infection (odds ratio [OR] =7.801, P = 0.037). Conclusion: The transcervical and transhiatal esophagectomy is a good operation for treating patients with EC, which may offer an opportunity to treat cases who cannot have thoracotomy.

Robot-assisted transhiatal lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy for Siewert type II advanced esophagogastric junction cancer with situs inversus totalis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital abnormality in which the thoracic and abdominal organs are reversed or mirrored from their usual positions. We herein report the first case of robot-assisted transhiatal lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy for treatment of Siewert type II advanced esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer with SIT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old man with SIT and intestinal malrotation was diagnosed with T3N0M0 Stage IIA EGJ cancer. Three-dimensional reconstruction of a computed tomography angiogram showed that the common hepatic artery was absent, the proper hepatic artery was derived from the superior mesenteric artery through the gastroduodenal artery, and an accessary left hepatic artery arose from the left gastric artery. The patient underwent robot-assisted transhiatal lower esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection, including lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Intraoperative examination revealed minor vascular abnormalities, including three branches of the left gastric artery and two left gastric veins, that had not been recognized preoperatively. The surgery was performed safely, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted surgery is efficient even for complex conditions, such as Siewert type II advanced EGJ cancer with SIT.

A Comparative Study between the Postoperative Complications of Stripping Esophagectomy and Classic (Orringer's Technique) Esophagectomy.

Recent studies have suggested that morbidity and mortality rate of transhiatal esophagectomy is comparable to that of thoracotomy, calling the need for the modifications in the surgical procedures. Our methodology includes stripping of esophagus by nasogastric tube to reduce the manipulation of thoracic cavity and associated complications. We also present the comparison between the stripping and classic (Orringer's technique) esophagectomy. Patients presenting esophageal carcinoma from 2015 to 2017 were the target of this study. Patients undergoing esophagectomy were randomized to have classic or stripping esophagectomy. Operating time, manipulation time, blood losses during the surgery, duration of hospitalization, volume intake, hypotension time, arrhythmia, and transfusion were the recorded parameters. Complications, such as anastomotic leak, cardiac effects, and morbidity, were also studied. Seventy patients were referred for transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma at the Al Zahra Hospital. Mean ages of patients in the stripping and Orringer group were 64.00 ± 10.57 and 57.42 ± 12.20 years, respectively. Manipulation time, operating time, blood loss during the surgery, and transfusion were statistically significant variables between the two groups. Although volume intake and duration of hospitalization were not significantly different parameters, however, betterment in the outcomes was evident. Substantial decrease in overall complications via stripping method was obtained, hence can be suggested as an effective alternative, to remove the need of thoracotomy, for transhiatal esophagectomy.

Minimally Invasive Transcervical Esophagectomy With Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Cancer. A Comparison With Standardized Techniques.

Pulmonary complications remain the most common problem following transthoracic esophagectomy. Minimally invasive approach has significantly improved clinical outcomes; however, respiratory distress is still significant. Minimally invasive transcervical esophagectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy avoids thoracic access, which may decrease pulmonary complications. Transcervical esophagectomy refers to transcervical esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymphadenectomy followed by a transhiatal gastric and distal-esophageal mobilization, abdominal and lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Adoption of innovative minimally invasive techniques for the transcervical or transhiatal approach, such as laparoscopy or robotic-assisted mediastinoscopy have made possible transmediastinal approach for radical esophagectomy. This novel approach with avoidance of thoracotomy or thoracoscopy can omit one lung ventilation as in transthoracic esophagectomy. Patients with previous thoracic surgery, impaired respiratory system, and major comorbidities, who are unable to undergo transthoracic esophagectomy, become candidates for radical esophagectomy with promising results. Minimally invasive transcervical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a safe and feasible approach and may be a valuable alternative with promising clinical and oncological outcomes.

Incidence of chylothorax over nineteen years of transhiatal esophagectomy: A case series and review study.

Objectives: Chylothorax (CTx) is the leak and accumulation of lymphatic fluid within the pleural cavity. The incidence of CTx has the highest rate after esophagectomy. This study aimed to present three cases of post-esophagectomy chylothorax among 612 esophagectomies that were performed over 19 years, in which post-esophagectomy chylothorax was reviewed in terms of risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Material and Methods: Six hundred and twelve patients were included in the study. Transhiatal esophagectomy was used for all patients. In three cases, chylothorax was detected. In all of the three cases, secondary surgery was performed for the management of chylothorax. Mass ligation was performed for the first and third cases having leak from the right side. In the second case, the leak was from the left side without prominent duct; and despite mass ligation that was done several times, no significant reduction in chyle was observed. Results: In the first case, in spite of reduced output, the patient gradually progressed to respiratory distress. His condition deteriorated over time and he died after three days. In the second case that needed third surgery, the patient's condition deteriorated and she died after two days due to respiratory failure. The third patient had postoperative recovery. The patient was discharged on fifth day after the second operation. Conclusion: In post-esophagectomy chylothorax, the key to preventing high mortality rates can be the identification of risk factors as well as timely detection of symptoms and proper management. Besides, early surgical intervention should be considered to prevent early complications of chylothorax.

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with high-risk post-operative complications.

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is challenging, due to considerable morbidity, especially in high surgical risk patients. While transhiatal esophagectomy leads to good oncological outcomes and reduced postoperative complications, less invasive techniques might further improve outcomes. Our goal was to compare results of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) with open transhiatal esophagectomy (OTE) in esophageal cancer patients at high surgical risk. From 2014 to 2020, 128 patients were identified. Seventy received OTE while 51 received LTE. After propensity score matching (1:1), postoperative complications, analysis of overall and disease-free survival, and survival-related prognostic factors were assessed in two groups of 48 patients. Ninety-one (77%) patients were men with a mean age of 65 ± 10.3 years. Those who underwent OTE experienced more clinical and surgical complications. In LTE patients, the number of mean resected lymph nodes was 25.9, and in patients who had OTE, it was 17.4 (P < 0.001). Overall survival was 56.0% in the LTE group and 33.6% (P = 0.023) in the OTE group. In multivariable analysis of overall survival, open surgery and incomplete pathological response were seen as worse negative factors. In multivariable analysis, metastatic lymph nodes, incomplete pathologic response, surgical complications, and a Charlson's index > 2 (P = 0.014) were associated with poor prognosis. Both surgical methods are safe with similar morbidity and mortality; however, LTE was associated with fewer complications, a higher number of resected lymph nodes, better overall survival, and more prognostic factors related to global and disease-free overall survival in high-risk patients.

Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.

Esophagectomy is a high-risk operation, regardless of technique. Minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy could reduce length of stay and pulmonary complications compared to traditional open approaches, but the benefits of minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy are unclear. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively gathered data for open transhiatal esophagectomies (THEs) and transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (TH-RAMIEs) performed at a high-volume academic center between 2013 and 2017. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for outcomes. 465 patients met inclusion criteria (378 THE and 87 TH-RAMIE). THE patients more likely had an ASA score of 3 + (89.1% vs 77.0%, p = 0.012), whereas TH-RAMIE patients more likely had a pathologic staging of 3+ (43.7% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.026). TH-RAMIE patients were less likely to receive epidurals (aOR 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.14, p < 0.001), but epidural use itself was not associated with differences in outcomes. TH-RAMIE patients experienced higher rates of pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% CI 1.03-3.22, p = 0.040), particularly pulmonary embolus (aOR 5.20, 95% CI 1.30-20.82, p = 0.020). There were no statistically significant differences in lymph node harvest, unexpected ICU admission, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, or 30-day readmission or mortality rates. The TH-RAMIE approach had higher rates of pulmonary complications. There were no statistically significant advantages to the TH-RAMIE approach. Further investigation is needed to understand the benefits of a minimally invasive approach to the open transhiatal esophagectomy.

Transhiatal esophagectomy in Boerhaave syndrome - Case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Boerhaave syndrome or spontaneous rupture of the esophagus wall is a rare life-threatening condition. It is more common in male gender and is due to a very swift rise in intraluminal pressure during vomiting. The patient usually presents with chest pain after vomiting. In some cases, there is subcutaneous emphysema in the neck or upper chest. Due to its rarity, the diagnosis is often not straightforward. Chest radiography can reveal pneumothorax, pleural effusion or pneumomediastinum, but diagnosis is more likely possible with an oral contrast X-ray study. CASE PRESENTATION: This paper reports a clinical case with surgical approach, in a 68-years old patient with a 48 h period between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of a Boerhaave syndrome. Firstly, the patient was admitted with a presumptive diagnosis of pneumonia. The patient was with chest pain, fever and vomiting. An emergent transhiatal esophagectomy was performed with primary anastomosis with no significant post-operative morbidity and allowing for the patient to return to previous daily routine with a good quality of life. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Boerhaave syndrome is a rare life-threatening surgical condition. Surgery is the most effective treatment. It is necessary to have a high index of suspicion. Treatment should promptly start because prognosis is related with time from diagnosis, with increasing mortality rate if no treatment is performed.

Tocilizumab in SARS-COVID19 following postoperative laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for the adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric tumor: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is one of the most challenging surgical procedures, with high rates of morbidity, especially from respiratory complications. SARS-COVID19 represents a health threat nowadays. Peri-operative SARS-COVID19 infection after esophagectomy might negatively affect the postoperative outcomes. The use of tocilizumab as an alternative to reduce the inflammatory response in SARS-COVID19 is an option that has not been described in the literature after esophagectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A SARS-COVID19-vaccinated (CORONAVAC) 73-year-old man with pulmonary emphysema, coronary artery disease, previous asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction tumor was submitted to laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (ypT2N0M0) after perioperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. He was also infected with SARS-COVID19, confirmed by PCR test at the 14th postoperative day. During follow-up, mild hypoxemia persisted without evidence of infection except for SARS-COVID19, and a high-flow cannula was required to maintain oxygenation. Tocilizumab was administered following high parameters of a high-flow cannula, and invasive mechanical ventilation was avoided. DISCUSSION: Besides of the risk of secondary infection, after administration of tocilizumab, the parameters of oxygen supplementation were systematically reduced, and he stayed in the ICU for seven days. He was discharged from the ward six days later. He developed late cervical anastomotic leakage, which was treated with conservative therapy. CONCLUSION: Although the patient had high-risk comorbidities, esophagectomy, and SARS-COVID19 infection, the use of tocilizumab was safe and improved the pulmonary recovery.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy the Standard of Care: Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center from India.

For localized esophageal cancer, esophageal resection remains the prime form of treatment but is a highly invasive procedure associated with prohibitive morbidity. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by laparoscopic or thoracoscopic approach was therefore introduced to reduce surgical trauma and its associated morbidity. We thereby review our minimally invasive esophagectomy results with short- and long-term outcomes. From January 2010 through December 2016, 459 patients with carcinoma esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The morbidity, mortality data with short- and long-term results of the procedure were studied. Patients were stratified into two arms based on the approach into minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy (MI-THE) and minimal invasive transthoracic esophagectomy TTE (MI-THE). Thirty days mortality in the whole cohort was 3.5% (2.5% in MI-THE vs. 5% in MI-TTE arm). Anastomotic leak rates (5 vs. 4.9%), median intensive care unit (ICU) stay (4 days), hospital stay (9 days), were similar between both the approaches. Major pulmonary complications were significantly higher in MI-TTE arm (18.9% vs 12.5%) (p 0.047). Cardiac, renal, conduit-related complication rates, vocal cord palsy, chyle leak, re-exploration, and late stricture rates were similar between the groups. The median number of nodes resected was higher in the MI-TTE arm (14 vs. 12) (p 0.002). R0 resection rate in the entire cohort was 89% (87.4% in MI-THE, 92% in MI-TTE arm p 0.12). The median overall survival and disease-free survival were also not different between MI-THE and MI-TTE arms (34 vs. 38 months, p 0.64) (24 vs. 36 months, p 0.67). Minimally invasive esophagectomy either by transhiatal or transthoracic approach is feasible and can be safely accomplished with a low morbidity and mortality and with satisfactory R0 resection rates, good nodal harvest, and acceptable long-term oncological outcomes.