Body mass index in pediatric kidney transplant selection criteria.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased complications, rejection, and graft loss after kidney transplantation in adult and pediatric recipients. Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a common contraindication to transplant at adult kidney transplant programs; however, there is no data on such limitations for pediatric patients. METHODS: Between October and December 2022, we conducted a survey of Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium centers assessing the use of BMI in pediatric kidney transplant evaluation. Centers reporting utilization of BMI cutoffs were invited to submit patient-level data on children declined for active transplant listing due to BMI. RESULTS: Thirty-nine centers responded to the survey (42% response rate); 51% include BMI in their written listing criteria, with a median BMI "cutoff" of 39 kg/m2 (range 30-50 kg/m2). Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, 30 children at 15 transplant centers were declined for listing status due to BMI. Patient-level data was provided for 19 children (63%) who were denied active listing status; median BMI was 42 kg/m2 (range 35.8-49.4 kg/m2) and 84% were on dialysis. One year after evaluation, seven patients (37%) had proceeded to active wait list status. Eight (42%) remained in inactive status and four (21%) were unlisted; ten of these 12 patients (83%) were on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of BMI in pediatric kidney transplant evaluation and listing varies among centers, but BMI limits access to transplant for some children. More information is needed on the outcomes of obese pediatric kidney candidates who are and are not transplanted, to guide development of national and international consensus.

The pre-transplant evaluation: Considerations for trainees and early career transplant infectious diseases clinician.

Transplant infectious disease (TID) clinicians are integral to the pre-transplantation evaluation. Pre-transplant evaluations allow clinicians to assess risk factors for latent infections and relevant exposures to potential pathogens, address immunizations, and optimize patients' health and understanding of life after transplant. However, there is not a standardized approach to the pre-transplant evaluation. This article reviews the details of performing successful pre-transplant evaluations, including updated recommendations on available vaccines and contemporary opinions on marijuana use. This resource can be used for teaching with trainees or for early career TID clinicians.

Medical Distrust Among Kidney Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Medical distrust may hinder kidney transplantation (KT) access. Among KT candidates evaluated for waitlisting, we identified factors associated with high distrust levels and quantified their association with waitlisting. METHODS: Among 812 candidates (2018-2023), we assessed distrust using the Revised Health Care System Distrust Scale across composite, competence, and values subscales. We used linear regression to quantify the associations between candidate and neighborhood-level factors and distrust scores. We used Cox models to quantify the associations between distrust scores and waitlisting. RESULTS: At KT evaluation, candidates who were aged 35-49 years (difference = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.78-3.16), female (difference = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.23-1.97), and Black (difference = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.47-2.47) were more likely to report higher composite distrust score. For subscales, candidates aged 35-49 were more likely to have higher competence distrust score (difference = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.59-1.68) and values distrust score (difference = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.05-1.61). Race/ethnicity (Black, difference = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.76-2.07; Hispanic, difference = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.35-2.69) was only associated with higher values distrust scores. Female candidates reporting higher rescaled values distrust scores (each one point) had a lower chance of waitlisting (aHR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98), whereas this association was not observed among males. Similarly, among non-White candidates, each 1-point increase in both rescaled composite (aHR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.99) and values (aHR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) distrust scores was associated with a lower chance of waitlisting, while there was no association among White candidates. CONCLUSION: Female, younger, and non-White candidates reported higher distrust scores. Values distrust may contribute to the long-standing racial/ethnic and gender disparities in access to KT. Implementing tailored strategies to reduce distrust in transplant care may improve KT access for groups that experience persistent disparities.

Opportunities for Improving the Transplant Assessment and Education Process in British Columbia: Patient and Health Care Provider Perspective.

Background: There are several steps patients and their health care providers must navigate to access kidney transplantation in British Columbia (BC). Objective: We explored perceptions and experiences with the pretransplant process across BC to determine where process improvements can be made to enhance access to transplantation. Design: Anonymous surveys were sent online and via post to health care providers (including nephrologists, registered nurses, and coordinators) and patients across BC. Setting: Kidney care clinics, transplant regional clinics, and provincial transplant centers in BC. Measurements: Surveys included Likert scale questions on the current pretransplant process and transplant education available in BC. The health provider survey focused on understanding the pretransplant process, knowledge, roles, and communication while the patient survey focused on patient education and experience of the pretransplant processes. Results: A total of 100 health care providers and 146 patients responded. Seventy-six percent of health care providers understood their role and responsibility in the pretransplant process, while only 47% understood others' roles in the process. Fifty-nine percent of health care respondents felt adequately supported by the provincial donor and transplant teams. Seventy-one percent of registered nurses and 92% of nephrologists understood transplant eligibility. About 68% and 77% of nurses and nephrologists, respectively, reported having enough knowledge to discuss living donation with patients. Fifty percent of patients had received transplant education, of which 60% had a good grasp of the pretransplant clinical processes. Sixty-three percent felt their respective kidney teams had provided enough advice and tools to support them in finding a living donor. Fifty percent of patients reported feeling up to date with their status in the evaluation process. Limitations: This analysis was conducted between December 2021 and June 2022 and may need to account for practice changes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses are from a selection of health care providers, thus acknowledging a risk of selection bias. Furthermore, we are not able to verify patients who reported receiving formal transplant education from their health care providers. Conclusions: Exploring these themes suggests communication with regional clinics and transplant centers can be improved. In addition, patient and staff education can benefit from education on kidney transplantation and the pretransplant clinical processes. Our findings provide opportunities to develop strategies to actively address modifiable barriers in a patient's kidney transplantation journey.

Contexte: En Colombie-Britannique (C.-B.), pour accéder à la transplantation, les patients et leurs prestataires de soins doivent traverser plusieurs étapes. Objectif: Nous avons exploré les perceptions et expériences en lien avec le processus de pré-transplantation dans toute la Colombie-Britannique, afin de cibler les améliorations qui pourraient y être apportées pour faciliter l'accès à la transplantation. Conception: Des sondages anonymes ont été envoyés en ligne et par la poste aux prestataires de soins de santé (notamment des néphrologues, des infirmières autorisées et des coordonnateurs) et aux patients de partout en Colombie-Britannique. Cadre de l'étude: Cliniques de soins rénaux, cliniques régionales de transplantation et centres provinciaux de transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Mesures: Les sondages comprenaient des questions à échelles de Likert portant sur le processus actuel de pré-transplantation et l'éducation offerte sur la transplantation en Colombie-Britannique. Le sondage destiné aux prestataires de soins portait sur leur compréhension du processus de pré-transplantation, leurs connaissances, leurs rôles et la communication; le sondage destiné aux patients portait sur l'éducation reçue et leur expérience des processus de pré-transplantation. Résultats: En tout, 100 prestataires de soins et 146 patients ont répondu au sondage. Parmi les prestataires de soins, 76 % comprenaient leur rôle et leurs responsabilités dans le processus de pré-transplantation, mais 47 % seulement comprenaient le rôle des autres prestataires de soins dans le processus. Une proportion de 59 % des intervenants en santé se sentait adéquatement appuyée par les équipes provinciales de dons d'organes et de transplantation. Une grande majorité des infirmières autorisées (71 %) et des néphrologues (92 %) comprenaient les critères d'admissibilité à la transplantation. Les infirmières (68 %) et les néphrologues (77 %) estimaient avoir suffisamment de connaissances pour discuter du don vivant avec les patients. Quant aux patients, 50 % avaient reçu de l'éducation sur la transplantation et, de ceux-ci, 60 % avaient une bonne compréhension des processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. La majorité des patients (63 %) estimaient avoir reçu suffisamment de conseils et d'outils de la part de leurs équipes de soins rénaux pour les aider à trouver un donneur vivant. La moitié des patients (50 %) pensaient connaître leur statut dans le processus d'évaluation. Limites: Cette étude a été réalisée entre décembre 2021 et juin 2022 et pourrait devoir tenir compte des changements de pratiques survenus pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. Les réponses provenant d'une sélection de prestataires de soins de santé, nous reconnaissons ainsi un possible biais de sélection. Enfin, nous ne sommes pas en mesure d'évaluer les patients qui ont déclaré avoir reçu de l'éducation formelle sur la transplantation de la part de leurs prestataires de soins. Conclusion: L'exploration de ces thèmes a suggéré que la communication avec les cliniques régionales et les centres de transplantation peut être améliorée. De plus, les patients et le personnel soignant pourraient tirer profit d'éducation sur la transplantation rénale et les processus cliniques de pré-transplantation. Nos résultats offrent des occasions d'élaborer des stratégies pour s'attaquer activement aux obstacles modifiables dans le parcours de transplantation rénale d'un patient.

Evaluation of pediatric patients for intestinal transplantation in the modern era.

OBJECTIVES: To review recent evaluations of pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF) for intestinal transplantation (ITx), waiting list decisions, and outcomes of patients listed and not listed for ITx at our center. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 97 patients evaluated for ITx from January 2014 to December 2021 including data from referring institutions and protocol laboratory testing, body imaging, endoscopy, and liver biopsy in selected cases. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Patients were referred almost entirely from outside institutions, one-third because of intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), two-thirds because of repeated infective and non-IFALD complications under minimally successful intestinal rehabilitation, and a single patient because of lost central vein access. The majority had short bowel syndrome (SBS). Waiting list placement was offered to 67 (69%) patients, 40 of whom for IFALD. The IFALD group was generally younger and more likely to have SBS, have received more parenteral nutrition, have demonstrated more evidence of chronic inflammation and have inferior kidney function compared to those offered ITx for non-IFALD complications and those not listed. ITx was performed in 53 patients. Superior postevaluation survival was independently associated with higher serum creatinine (hazard ratio [HR] 15.410, p = 014), whereas inferior postevaluation survival was associated with ITx (HR 0.515, p = 0.035) and higher serum fibrinogen (HR 0.994, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Despite recent improvements in IF management, IFALD remains a prominent reason for ITx referral. Complications of IF inherent to ITx candidacy influence postevaluation and post-ITx survival.

Pre-Transplantation Strategies for Infectious Disease Mitigation and Prevention.

Pediatric Infectious Disease (ID) clinicians play a critical role in helping prevent and mitigate infectious risks in children peri- and post-transplantation. Prevention starts during the pre-transplant evaluation and persists throughout the solid organ transplant and hematopoietic cell transplant continuum. The pre-transplant evaluation is an opportunity to screen for latent infections, plan preventative strategies, optimize immunizations, and discuss risk mitigation practices. An ideal pre-transplant evaluation establishes a relationship with the family that further promotes post-transplant infectious risk reduction. This manuscript builds on shared pediatric ID prevention strategies, introduces updated ID testing recommendations for transplant donors/candidates, highlights emerging data, and identifies ongoing knowledge gaps that are potential areas of research.

Associations between the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant and one-year lung transplant medical and psychosocial outcomes.

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant (SIPAT) is a standardized measure of the psychosocial risk profile of solid organ transplant candidates. While studies have found associations between this measure and transplant outcomes, to date this has not been examined in lung transplant recipients. We examined relations between pre-transplant SIPAT scores and 1-year lung transplant medical and psychosocial outcomes in a sample of 45 lung transplant recipients. The SIPAT was significantly associated with 6-minute walk test (χ2(1) = 6.47, p = .010), number of readmissions (χ2(1) = 6.47, p = .011), and mental health services utilization (χ2(1) = 18.15, p < .001). It was not a significantly associated with the presence of organ rejection or mortality (ps > 0.10). Results suggest that the SIPAT can help identify patients who are at an elevated risk for transplant complications and thus would benefit from services to mitigate risk factors and improve outcomes.

Unmet Needs and Burden of Caregivers of Patients Being Evaluated for a Liver Transplant Are Similar to Those of Cancer Caregivers.

BACKGROUND: The caregivers (CG) of patients with serious illnesses often experience stress and psycho-social issues. High burden is expected for CG of patients for whom liver transplant (LT) is the only curative option. This study aims to measure the burden, unmet needs, and quality of life (QoL) of CG of patients being evaluated for LT. METHODS: This cross-sectional study enrolled CG of patients being evaluated for LT. CaTCoN (Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire) was used to assess caregiving consequences and needs related to interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs). ZBI-12 (Zarit Burden Interview) was used to assess CG burden, and PROMIS-29 (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) to assess QoL. Caregivers completed the study instruments in person, while they were in the clinic. CaTCoN scores from our study were compared with cancer caregivers' historical data. RESULTS: 18 CG were enrolled, mean age 54 [14] years; 72% were white and 77% were women. 61% worked full time; 45% provided >20 hours of care per week. Two-thirds cared for patients with alcoholic liver disease. All CaTCoN scores were no different from CGs of cancer patients (all P > .05). The total ZBI score (mean SD 12.4 [8.3]) did not differ from published scores for CG of cancer patients (12.0 [8.5]). 44% had high (≥12) ZBI scores reflecting "high burden." Their PROMIS-29 T scores, compared to those with low burden, showed more anxiety (P = .01), depression (P = .04), fatigue (P = .02) and deteriorated social function (P = .009). Physical function and social function were diminished among these CGs compared to the general population (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: CGs of patients being evaluated for LT suffer from high burden similar to cancer CGs and have reduced physical and social function. Despite the small sample size, the data completion rate was almost 100%.

Predicting Kidney Transplant Evaluation Non-attendance.

Non-attendance to kidney transplant evaluation (KTE) appointments is a barrier to optimal care for those with kidney failure. We examined the medical and socio-cultural factors that predict KTE non-attendance to identify opportunities for integrated medical teams to intervene. Patients scheduled for KTE between May, 2015 and June, 2018 completed an interview before their initial KTE appointment. The interview assessed various social determinants of health, including demographic (e.g., income), medical (e.g. co-morbidities), transplant knowledge, cultural (e.g., medical mistrust), and psychosocial (e.g., social support) factors. We used multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the strongest predictor of KTE non-attendance. Our sample (N = 1119) was 37% female, 76% non-Hispanic White, median age 59.4 years (IQR 49.2-67.5). Of note, 142 (13%) never attended an initial KTE clinic appointment. Being on dialysis predicted higher odds of KTE non-attendance (OR 1.76; p = .02; 64% of KTE attendees on dialysis vs. 77% of non-attendees on dialysis). Transplant and nephrology teams should consider working collaboratively with dialysis units to better coordinate care, (e.g., resources to attend appointment or outreach to emphasize the importance of transplant) adjusting the KTE referral and evaluation process to address access issues (e.g., using tele-health) and encouraging partnership with clinical psychologists to promote quality of life for those on dialysis.

The Evaluation and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Lung Transplant Patient.

Lung transplantation can greatly improve quality of life and extend survival in those with end-stage lung disease. In order to derive the maximal benefit from such a procedure, patients must be carefully selected and be otherwise healthy enough to survive a high-risk surgery and sometimes prolonged immunosuppressive therapy following surgery. Patients therefore must be critically assessed prior to being listed for transplantation with close attention paid towards assessment of cardiovascular health and operative risk. One of the biggest dictators of this is coronary artery disease. In this review article, we discuss the assessment and management of coronary artery disease in the potential lung transplant candidate.

Approach to vaccinating the pediatric solid organ transplant candidate and recipient.

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) candidates and recipients are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality from vaccine-preventable infections. Children are at particular risk given that they may not have completed their primary immunization series at time of transplant or have acquired natural immunity to pathogens from community exposures. Multiple society guidelines exist for vaccination of SOT candidate and recipients, although challenges remain given limited safety and efficacy data available for pediatric SOT recipients, particularly for live-vaccines. After transplant, individual patient nuances regarding exposure risks and net state of immunosuppression will impact timing of immunizations. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with a concise, practical, expert-opinion on the approach to vaccinating the SOT candidate and recipient and to supplement existing guidelines. In addition, pediatric-specific knowledge gaps in the field and future research priorities will be highlighted.

Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Liver Transplant Recipients Who Underwent Expedited Transplant Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Expedited liver transplant evaluations of critically ill patients can be challenging due to limited time for data gathering and psychosocial evaluation. AIMS: To compare clinical outcomes between expedited and traditional transplant evaluation patients and assess for differences in outpatient resource utilization and staff burden between groups. DESIGN: Adult liver transplant recipients who underwent transplant from 2015 to 2019 were included. Expedited evaluation was defined as time from initiating transplant evaluation to transplant listing <2 weeks. Primary outcomes included rates of graft rejection, graft failure, and death within 1-year posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included number of acute care visits, office visits, and medical record documentation made by transplant staff within 1-year posttransplant. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of the 335 patients included, 92 (27.5%) were expedited and 243 (72.5%) were traditional. Expedited patients were significantly younger, had greater MELD scores, and required more inpatient care and life support at time of transplant. There was no significant difference in risk of graft rejection (HR 1.3, P = .4), graft failure (HR 1.3, P = .6), or mortality (HR 1.0, P = .9) between groups. Expedited transplant was not associated with increased healthcare or staff utilization: acute care visits (rate ratio 0.9, P = .7), office visits (ß = -1.05, P = .2), and medical record documentation (ß = 3.4, P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being more critically ill, patients requiring expedited transplant evaluation have favorable outcomes after transplant and do not require more intensive staff time and resources compared to traditional candidates.

Characterization of the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant for heart, liver, and kidney transplant candidates in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a comprehensive psychosocial assessment proven useful for predicting the outcomes of organ transplantation that is expected to be useful in Japan. However, the characteristics of organ-specific SIPAT scores for organ transplant recipient candidates in Japan are unclear and, to date, the SIPAT has not been properly utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to present basic data that can be used to establish the relation between SIPAT scores and post-transplantation psychosocial outcomes as well as organ-specific outcomes. METHODS: This study included 167 transplant recipient candidates (25 heart, 71 liver, and 71 kidney) who completed a semi-structured interview based on the Japanese version of SIPAT (SIPAT-J) prior to transplantation. The differences between organs in terms of SIPAT scores and differences in SIPAT scores based on demographic data were comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The total SIPAT scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .019). Regarding the subscales, SIPAT B (social support system) scores were higher for liver and kidney recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .021), whereas SIPAT C (psychological stability and psychopathology) scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for kidney recipient candidates (P = .002). Recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were unemployed had higher SIPAT scores, regardless of the transplant organ, than recipient candidates without a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were employed (P < .001, P = .016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There were notable differences in the total SIPAT-J and subscale scores among the liver, heart, and kidney recipient candidates. Each organ was associated with specific psychosocial issues that should be addressed before transplantation. Interventions such as information provision and patient education based on SIPAT assessment results for each organ may improve recipient post-transplant outcomes.

Delayed referral for liver transplant evaluation worsens outcomes in chronic liver disease patients requiring inpatient transplant evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Indications to refer patients with cirrhosis for liver transplant evaluation (LTE) include hepatic decompensation or a model for end stage liver disease (MELD-Na) score ≥ 15. Few studies have evaluated how delaying referral beyond these criteria affects patient outcomes. AIM: To evaluate clinical characteristics of patients undergoing inpatient LTE and to assess the effects of delayed LTE on patient outcomes (death, transplantation). METHODS: This is a single center retrospective cohort study assessing all patients undergoing inpatient LTE (n = 159) at a large quaternary care and liver transplant center between 10/23/2017-7/31/2021. Delayed referral was defined as having prior indication (decompensation, MELD-Na ≥ 15) for LTE without referral. Early referral was defined as referrals made within 3 mo of having an indication based on practice guidelines. Logistic regression and Cox Hazard Regression were used to evaluate the relationship between delayed referral and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Many patients who require expedited inpatient LTE had delayed referrals. Misconceptions regarding transplant candidacy were a leading cause of delayed referral. Ultimately, delayed referrals negatively affected overall patient outcome and an independent predictor of both death and not receiving a transplant. Delayed referral was associated with a 2.5 hazard risk of death. CONCLUSION: Beyond initial access to an liver transplant (LT) center, delaying LTE increases risk of death and reduces risk of LT in patients with chronic liver disease. There is substantial opportunity to increase the percentage of patients undergoing LTE when first clinically indicated. It is crucial for providers to remain informed about the latest guidelines on liver transplant candidacy and the transplant referral process.

A Nominal Group Technique Study of Patients Who Identify as Black or African American and Access to Renal Transplantation.

Introduction: Completion of the renal transplant evaluation has been associated with several barriers for patients who identify as Black or African American. This study sought to prioritize barriers to and motivators of completing the renal transplant evaluation. Methods/Approach: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a nominal group technique were used to generate priority scores. Transplant professionals (N = 23) were recruited from 9 transplant centers in the Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Western, and Southeastern parts of the United States. Black or African American identifying renal patients (N = 30) diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease were recruited from 1 transplant center in the Mid-Atlantic region. Findings: Priority scores were created to assess the quantitative data of participant rankings of top barriers and motivators. The most significant barriers identified by both patients and transplant professionals comprised financial constraints, insurance issues, difficulty navigating the healthcare system, transportation difficulties, and multiple health problems. Facilitators consisted of family/social support, transplant education, patient navigators, comprehensive insurance, and physician repertoire and investment. A qualitative description of the ranked factors resulted in themes classified as intrapersonal, health, socioeconomic, transplant-specific healthcare, and general healthcare. Conclusion: These findings provided vital information to transplant centers nationwide about assessing the influences of renal transplant evaluation completion. Achieving equity in access to transplantation for Black or African American renal patients requires multilayered approaches.

Racial and ethnic disparities in psychosocial evaluation and liver transplant waitlisting.

Health disparities have been well-described in all stages of the liver transplantation (LT) process. Using data from psychosocial evaluations and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment, our objective was to investigate potential racial and ethnic inequities in overall LT waitlisting and not waitlisting for medical or psychosocial reasons. In a cohort of 2271 candidates evaluated for LT from 2014 to 2021 and with 1-8 years of follow-up, no significant associations were noted between race/ethnicity and overall waitlisting and not waitlisting for medical reasons. However, compared with White race, Black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.56) and Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.16-3.78) were associated with not waitlisting for psychosocial reasons. After adjusting for sociodemographic variables, the relationship persisted in both populations: Black (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38) and Hispanic/Latinx (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.08-4.86) (reference group, White). High-risk Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment scores were more prevalent in Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients, likely reflecting upstream factors and structural racism. Health systems and LT centers should design programs to combat these disparities and improve equity in access to LT.

The cascade of care in testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in liver transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND: Testing and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) can mitigate risk of active tuberculosis (TB) post-liver transplant (LT). Testing and treatment completion rates have been reported low in this population. Our study aims to quantify the proportion of LT candidates who completed LTBI care cascade in our center. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on LT candidates from 2012 to 2021. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who completed each cascade stage. Secondary outcome was an analysis of factors associated with positive and indeterminate LTBI testing. RESULTS: Of the 273 LT candidates, 265 (97.1%) were referred to transplant infectious disease (TID), 264 (96.7%) had orders for interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), 262 (96%) underwent TID evaluation, and 259 (94.9%) completed IGRA. Twenty had LTBI, and 18 were treatment naïve and recommended for treatment. Of the 18, 15 (83.3%) agreed to therapy, 14 (77.8%) initiated treatment, and 12 (66.7%) completed treatment. No posttransplant TB reactivation occurred. Patients born in Asia, previous incarceration, past military service, and granuloma findings on chest imaging were likely to have positive IGRA (p < .05). Older age and travel to TB-endemic countries were likely to have indeterminate IGRA (p < .05). Indeterminate IGRAs were more common in QuantiFERON (QTF)-Gold Plus TB (15.3%) versus QTF-Gold TB (9.3%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: High rates of LTBI testing and treatment initiation and completion can be attributed to a standardized process that includes TID evaluation. Future studies in larger cohort are needed to better understand factors that can optimize the completion rates of LTBI treatment in LT candidates.

Interitem Psychometric Validation of the Stanford Integrated Assessment for Transplant Scale Among Thoracic Transplant Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial evaluations are mandatory for transplant listing, however the methodology for creating psychosocial risk stratifications is unclear. The Standford Psychosocial Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant Scale is the most commonly used instrument, however its interitem validity has never been examined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interitem validity of a psychosocial assessment tool for transplant candidates among a sample of thoracic transplant candidates. METHODS: Clinic data consisting of Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant administrations from 173 heart and lung transplant candidates were fit to a partial credit model. Data were subsequently fit to 4 separate partial credit models based on subscale categories, demonstrating the discrimination parameter estimate of each item. Differential item functioning analyses were conducted on the data within each subscale by sex to investigate potential bias produced by each item. RESULTS: The initial partial credit model using the full scale did not converge, indicating the subscales possibly did not measure the same underlying construct. Subscale discrimination parameter estimates demonstrated that most items were adequately or highly discriminative. The item measuring history of substance use demonstrated poor fit and differential item functioning. CONCLUSIONS: While the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant has demonstrated strong potential as a standardized framework for psychosocial assessments in transplant, this study identified some areas for improvement in the scoring system. The subscale scores appeared to show greater construct validity when utilized individually than when aggregated to form a total score. The substance use/abuse/dependence item did not fit well into its respective subscale. Future studies should aim to optimize the scoring system and re-asses its construct validity to improve its accuracy in discriminating between high-risk candidates and those needing psychosocial assistance.