Application effect evaluation of the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention / 中国实用护理杂志

Objective:To apply the best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention to clinical practice and evaluate its effect.Methods:This was a quasi-experimental study. Based on the evidence continuous quality improvement model, evidence-based practice method was used to obtain the best evidence, formulated review indicators, analyzed the obstacles in the practice process and took action strategies. The 88 patients who underwent transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the Cardiology Department of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from June 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the baseline review group by convenience sampling. The 94 patients who underwent this treatment from September 1 to 30, 2020 were selected as the evidence application group. The baseline review group used the original perioperative management plan, and the evidence application group used the perioperative management plan based on the best evidence. The implementation rate of each review indicator, the incidence of radial artery occlusion, the degree of compression pain, and the comfort level of patients were compared between the two groups.Results:The implementation rates of review indicators 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 in the evidence application group were 100.0% (94/94), 100.0% (94/94), 11.7(11/94), 88.3% (83/94), 100.0% (94/94), 100.0%(94/94), 85.1%(80/94), respectively, which were higher than those in the baseline review group(all 0), except for the review indicator 4, the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 values were 9.00-178.02, all P<0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion and the incidence of pain Numerical Rating Scale>3 points in the evidence application group were 2.1% (2/94) and 3.2% (3/94), respectively, which were lower than 14.8% (13/88) and 23.9% (21/88) in the baseline review group; the comfort level of patients in the evidence application group was 96.8% (91/94), which was higher than 63.6% (56/88) in the baseline review group. The differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 8.01, 15.21, 30.10, all P<0.05). Conclusions:The best evidence for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary angiography or intervention can be applied to clinical practice, which can standardize the behavior of medical staff, reduce the incidence of postoperative radial artery occlusion, reduce the degree of compression pain, and improve the comfort of patients.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Elastic Bandages for Forearm Hematoma After Transradial Coronary Intervention.

Background: This study compares the efficacy of two elastic bandages in treating forearm hematoma after transradial coronary intervention. Methods: A total of 60 patients with moderate or severe forearm hematoma following transradial coronary intervention were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups, as follows: an Idealast-haft elastic bandage group (the observation group) and a control group. The patients in the Idealast-haft elastic bandage group received compression bandaging with Idealast-haft elastic bandages and the patients in the control group received compression bandaging with Nylexorgrip elastic bandages. Observation indexes related to, for example, forearm pain, arterial pulsation, blistering, skin color, and hemostasis time were compared between the two groups. Results: The results revealed that the times taken for pain disappearance, arterial pulse recovery, blister disappearance, skin color recovery, and compression hemostasis were significantly shorter in the Idealast-haft elastic bandage group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The hematoma range and the arm circumference at the severest part of the hematoma decreased faster in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The Idealast-haft elastic bandage is more effective than the Nylexorgrip elastic bandage in patients with forearm hematoma following transradial coronary intervention and should therefore be used in such cases.

Forearm hematoma as a complication of transradial coronary intervention: an Indian single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Forearm hematomas are not uncommon after transradial coronary interventions. The present study describes the incidence and predictors of forearm hematoma formation after transradial coronary interventions. METHODS: This was a prospective study in 1754 patients undergoing angiography/angioplasty through transradial access. Each procedure was performed using optimum levels of anticoagulation, hydrophilic sheaths, and post-procedural patent hemostasis protocols. Patients were evaluated for forearm hematoma immediately after the procedure, after radial band removal, and on the next day of the procedure. Severity of hematomas was graded according to the Early Discharge after Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study scale. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were done to determine the predictors of hematoma formation. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 56.31 years and 82.2% were males. A total of 1374 (78.3%) patients underwent angioplasty while 380 (21.7%) underwent angiography. Forearm hematoma developed in 187 (10.7%) patients. Grade I hematoma was most common (3.53%) followed by Grade II (3.08%), Grade III (2.83%) and Grade IV (1.25%) hematoma. None of the patients required vascular or surgical interventions for this complication. Female gender, multiple puncture attempts, intensive antiplatelet therapy, complex procedure and longer hemostasis time were significant predictors of forearm hematoma formation post transradial coronary interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm hematoma developed in substantial proportion of patients undergoing transradial coronary interventions and interventional variables were predominantly associated with hematoma formation. Pre-emptive knowledge of modifiable interventional risk factors can help in reducing the burden of this complication.

Anatomical features of the radial artery in the Xinjiang population in China and its impact on the transradial coronary intervention procedure.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical features of the radial artery (RA) influence the transradial coronary intervention. The aim of this study is to discuss the anatomical features of the RA in the Xinjiang population and to guide interventionists in decreasing complications and improving success rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 1731 patients in this study. All relevant basic information was recorded in detail, and the RA diameter was examined. Patients were divided into a RA variation group and a RA non-variation group; univariate and multivariate factor analyses were performed to evaluate the relevant factors for RA diameter and the predictive value of the variable factors in RA variations. RESULTS: The mean RA diameter for all patients was 3.01 ± 0.14 mm. The multi-factorial analysis showed that height, gender, and occupation are significantly associated with RA diameter (p < 0.05). The incidence of RA variation was 4.97% (86/1731). Multi-factorial analysis showed that: gender (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.469-5.037, p < 0.01), occupation (OR 2.228, 95% CI 1.0.000-0.012, p < 0.001) and RA inner diameter (OR 0.002, 95% CI 0.000-0.012, p < 0.001) are significantly associated with the incidence of RA variation. CONCLUSIONS: The mean RA diameter in the Xinjiang population was 3.01 ± 0.14 mm, height, gender, occupation are associated with RA diameter, gender, farmer, RA diameter are associated with RA variation. These factors can guide the interventionists to choose the appropriate equipment before the operation then can increase the efficiency of operation and prevent from the complications.

Parallel Stenting for Treatment of an In-stent Chronic Total Occlusion after Successful Dissection Reentry Technique.

Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) are the most challenging type of procedure in interventional cardiology and are traditionally associated with increased complexity and reduced procedural success rates. New techniques, such as retrograde approach and dissection reentry technique, offer alternatives in case of traditional antegrade wiring failure. In this paper, we present a successful implantation of a stent parallel to other existing stent in an in-stent CTO (IS-CTO) using dissection reentry technique. The technical details involved and the clues to successful outcome in an individual with in-stent CTO are discussed.

Angiographic verifi cation and clinical predictors of anatomical variations of radial artery / 中国介入心脏病学杂志

Objective To discuss the incidence and clinical predictor factors of anatomical variation of radial arteries among patients in the XingJing province of China. Methods A total of 1731 patients who underwent transradial coronary intervention for the first time during the period of Jan.2016-June.2016 in the People‵s Hospital of Xin jiang Uyghur Autonomous Region were enrolled in this study. All relevant basic information and related medical history were recorded in detail.Right radial artery angiography was performed in all patients, According to the definition of radial artery variation, the patients were decided into the radial artery variation group and the normal radial artery group. Single factor and multiple factors logistic regression analysis were performed to evaluate the predictive value of variables factors in radial artery variations. Results The incidence of radial artery variation was 4.97%(86/1731).The incidence of radial artery spasm in the radial artery variation group33.72%(29/86),and 2.74% (45/1645) in the normal radial artery group (P<0.001).The failure rate of coronary intervanton by right radial artery in the radial artery variation group was 26.74%(23/86)and 1.51%(25/1645)in the normal radial artery group(P<0.001).The overall success rate of coronary intervention through right radial artery approach was 97.23%(1683/1731).Female gender,short statue、low body weight,history hyperlipidemia,smoking,drinking rabbit,occupation as farmer were found to be associated with the existence of radial artery variation (all P < 0.05).Diabetes,body mass index,hyperlipidemia and ethnicity were not associated with the existence of radial artery variation (all P >0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, farmer occupation, hyperlipidemia were associated with the occurrence of radial artery variation. Increased in age by every 10 years would bring a 0.264 fold increase in risk of radial artery variation(OR 1.264,95%CI 1.006-1.587, P=0.044)and the risk of radial artery variation in females was 3.999 times to males(OR 3.999, 95%CI 2.241-7.136,P<0.001).The risk of radial artery variation in patients with hyperlipidemia was 1.776 times to patients without hyperlipidemia(OR 1.776,95%CI 1.011-3.122,P=0.046)and the risk of radial artery variation in farmers was 2.188 times higher than others(OR 2.188,95%CI 1.238-3.867, P=0.007). Conclusions For people in Xinjiang in China,anatomical variation of radial artery was uncommon. Advanced age, female gender, short states, low body weight, hyperlipidemia, smoking, drinking and farmer occupation were associated with the occurrence of radial artery variation. Multivariates logistic regression analysis showed advanced age, female gender, hyperlipidemia, farmers were associated whit the presence of radial artery variation. These factors have predictive value for the existence of radial artery variation.

Safety and efficacy of transradial coronary angiography and intervention in patients older than 80 years: from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Radial artery access for coronary procedures is a safe and beneficial technique. However, elderly patients have been considered as a higher risk group of access site related complications compared to younger patients. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and safety of transradial coronary angiography or intervention in the elderly. METHODS: A total of 6132 patients from Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry at 20 centers were analyzed. Patients were divided into the non-elderly group (n = 5667) and the elderly (≥ 80 years) group (n = 465). Using propensity score matching, the elderly group (n = 465) was compared with one-to-one matched the non-elderly group (n = 465). RESULTS: After propensity score matching, mean age was 64.3 ± 10.3 years in the non-elderly group and 83.5 ± 3.3 years in the elderly group. There was no difference of procedural characteristics, procedural and fluoroscopic times. Access site cross-over rate was not different between the non-elderly group and elderly group (7.5% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.074). Bleeding complications occurred similarly in two groups (2.6% of the non-elderly group vs. 1.9% of the elderly group, P = 0.660). Access site complications were 1.9% of the non-elderly group and 0.9% of the elderly group (P = 0.263). Both of in hospital death and cardiovascular death for one year were also similar between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial angiography or intervention was safe and feasible in elderly patients. Complication rates and clinical outcomes in elderly patients were comparable with those in non-elderly patients.

Interosseous artery as an access artery in case of late radial artery occlusion.

We report a new technique of arterial access through the ipsilateral interosseous artery in a case of late radial artery occlusion (RAO). RAO, although not frequent, is a limiting iatrogenic complication after transradial intervention (TRI) and precludes repeat use of the same radial artery for future procedures. Our technique involves obtaining access to the ipsilateral radial artery (RA) in the distal postocclusion segment and use of collateral channel between this segment and the interosseous artery (IOA) for advancing a guidewire and sheath in the IOA lumen and in brachial artery thereafter. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

New technique for treatment of postcatheterization radial artery pseudoaneurysm.

We report a new technique for treatment of radial artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) caused by transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography. Traditional extrinsic compression with radial flow cessation leads to a local milieu likely associated with an increase in probability of radial artery occlusion (RAO). Our technique involves obtaining ipsilateral radial artery access distal to the neck of the RAP followed by a prolonged sheath dwell time covering the neck of the RAP which allows the RAP sac to thrombose and maintains radial artery lumen patency. © 2016 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Effect of Long-Term Administration of Nicorandil on Endothelial Function of the Radial Artery in Patients With Angina Undergoing Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

We evaluated the effect of long-term administration of nicorandil on endothelial function of the radial artery in patients with angina undergoing elective transradial coronary intervention (TRI). A total of 127 patients were randomly assigned to nicorandil (standard medication plus nicorandil 5 mg twice daily, n = 64) or control group (standard medication except nicorandil, n = 63) immediately after TRI procedure. Radial artery diameter (RAD), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) of radial artery were measured 1 day before TRI as well as 1 day and 3 months after TRI by Ultrasound-Doppler. No significant difference was observed in the baseline RAD, FMD, and NMD between the 2 groups (all P > .05). In cannulated arm, at 3-month follow-up, RAD in nicorandil group was much larger than that in the control group (2.78 ± 0.27 mm vs 2.61 ± 0.30 mm, P = .001). Besides, FMD and NMD were much higher in nicorandil group than those in the control group (10.38% ± 2.43% vs 6.81% ± 1.86%; 15.94% ± 6.28% vs 10.46% ± 5.37%, respectively, all Ps < .001). In conclusion, long-term administration of nicorandil after TRI could improve the endothelial function of the cannulated radial artery.

Transradial versus Transfemoral Approach in Peripheral Arterial Interventions.

This study aims to compare the clinical and procedural characteristics, including iatrogenic complications, of transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients who underwent peripheral arterial interventions. We retrospectively analyzed data of 72 patients who had undergone interventions of peripheral arteries in the preceding 3 years. Of all the procedures, 39 were performed using the transfemoral approach and 33 using the transradial approach. We assessed baseline clinical factors as well as procedure-related parameters (volume of contrast media, the amount of radiation, and duration of radiation exposure), rates of primary success, and acute vascular, access-site, or neurological complications. Patients whose interventions were done via transradial access had similar demographic characteristics to those who had transfemoral angioplasties. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors was similar in the two groups, but patients in the transradial subset were significantly more likely to have dyslipidemia (90.9 vs.71.7%, p value = 0.04) and less likely to have baseline chronic kidney disease (3.0 vs. 23.0%, p value = 0.01). The length of admission was shorter for patients who underwent transradial interventions compared with the transfemoral approach (1.1 vs. 1.3 days, p value = 0.04). Fluoroscopy time, the amount of radiation, and the volume of contrast media were similar between the two groups. Rates of primary success and periprocedural complications did not differ between the two groups. The transradial route appears to be a viable, safe, and noninferior alternative to the transfemoral approach for treatment of atherosclerotic stenosis in peripheral arterial territories. Prospective studies are needed.

Transradial Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main and/or Multivessel Disease in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

The overall safety and efficacy of transradial coronary intervention (TRI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with unprotected left main (UPLM) disease and/or multivessel coronary disease (MVD) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have not been established. Consecutive patients with ACS undergoing TRI with drug-eluting stent (n = 1431) or CABG (n = 651) for UPLM and/or MVD were included. A propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 cohorts, yielding 524 pairs of matched patients. Median clinical follow-up was 32 months. After propensity-score adjustment, no significant difference was observed between the TRI and CABG groups in all-cause mortality (4.0% vs 5.2%; P = .375). Transradial coronary intervention was favored by a significant increase in the incidence of stroke in the CABG group (0.4% vs 1.9%; P = .020), whereas a significantly increased target vessel revascularization rate (16.8% vs 6.3%; P < .0001) observed in the TRI group favored CABG. Composite outcome (death/myocardial infarction/stroke) was comparable between the TRI and the CABG groups (8.0% vs 11.5%; P = .061). Clinical outcomes of TRI on UPLM and/or MVD for patients with ACS are comparable to CABG in composite safety outcomes with the advantage to TRI for avoiding a stroke.

Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender (GSS). The transradial (TR) approach has become popular because of several advantages, such as a reduced rate of vascular access site complications. However, because the radial artery is narrow, a limitation of TR access is the potential for artery spasm or occlusion. Studies of radial artery size demonstrate that 5 Fr sheaths are too wide for more than 10 % of patients. The GSS (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) is a new radial sheath with a thinner wall and a hydrophilic coating. It has an inner diameter that is compatible with a 5 Fr guiding catheter, while the outer diameter is similar to that of a 4 Fr sheath. A total of 21 consecutive patients undergoing transradial angiography and/or transradial percutaneous coronary intervention with the 5 Fr GSS were included, and safety and feasibility of the device were assessed. Transradial angiography was performed in 10 patients, and transradial intervention in 11 patients. All procedures were successful, without the need for conversion to the transfemoral approach. The radial artery occlusion rate was 0 %, including a patient who had experienced six previous radial artery punctures. There were no cases of artery spasm, hematoma, major bleeding or functional disorders. One coronary artery perforation caused by a guidewire was reported, but it was unrelated to the sheath introducer. The new 5 Fr GSS was safe and feasible for transradial angiography and transradial intervention.

Nursing of patients with bone fascia compartment syndrome after radial artery coronary artery intervention / 现代临床护理

Objective To explore the causes of bone fascia compartment syndrome after radial artery coronary artery intervention and sum up the nursing experience. Method The clinical data of 8 patients with bone fascia compartment syndrome after radial artery coronary artery intervention from January 2009 to December 2014 were analyzed retrospectively to summarize the nursing countermeasures, including close observation of illness, swelling and pain nursing, medication and blood and monitoring of coagulation functions. Result The forearm of all patients were painful, swollen and enlarged, 6 of them with radial pulse abating,1 with finger pulling pain, 2 with muscle decreasing. Conclusions The early observation and treatment of bone fascia compartment syndrome are critical. Great importance to the complaints of patients should be attached in view of the causes of complications so that effective nursing strategy can be taken to save time of conservative treatment, alleviate the patients'pains and promote their early recovery.

Usefulness of Deep Seating Technique for Transradial Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Smaller guiding catheter had a problem with poor backup support during the transradial coronary intervention which resulted in higher failure rate. This study sought to prove the usefulness of deep seating technique which improves the backup support of the guiding catheter required to deliver interventional materials during the transradial coronary intervention. METHODS: Thirthy-five patients(23 males) were included in this study since March 1998 to August 1999. Clinical presentation of these patients were stable angina(7 patients), unstable angina(17 patients), acute myocardial infarction(11 cases). The mean age was 68+/-8 years. The treated vessel was left anterior descending artery in 22, left circumflex artery in 2 and right coronary artery in 11 of 35 vessels. RESULT: Twenty-six lesions were treated with stents, 3 with PTCA, and 6 with rotablator. Procedural success were achieved in 33 out of 35 cases(94%). Guiding catheters were used mostly with 6 Fr(30/35). In the left coronary system, usual Judkins left type was used in most of the patients(24/26, 92%), and in right coronary Judkins, Amplatz and multipurpose catheters were used similiarly. Hypotension and sinus bradycardia was encountered in one case without clinical significance and there was no dissection in all patients. CONCLUSION: Deep seating technique is a safe and effective technique without major adverse event during the transradial coronary intervention in selected cases.

Usefulness of Deep Seating Technique for Transradial Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND: Smaller guiding catheter had a problem with poor backup support during the transradial coronary intervention which resulted in higher failure rate. This study sought to prove the usefulness of deep seating technique which improves the backup support of the guiding catheter required to deliver interventional materials during the transradial coronary intervention. METHODS: Thirthy-five patients(23 males) were included in this study since March 1998 to August 1999. Clinical presentation of these patients were stable angina(7 patients), unstable angina(17 patients), acute myocardial infarction(11 cases). The mean age was 68+/-8 years. The treated vessel was left anterior descending artery in 22, left circumflex artery in 2 and right coronary artery in 11 of 35 vessels. RESULT: Twenty-six lesions were treated with stents, 3 with PTCA, and 6 with rotablator. Procedural success were achieved in 33 out of 35 cases(94%). Guiding catheters were used mostly with 6 Fr(30/35). In the left coronary system, usual Judkins left type was used in most of the patients(24/26, 92%), and in right coronary Judkins, Amplatz and multipurpose catheters were used similiarly. Hypotension and sinus bradycardia was encountered in one case without clinical significance and there was no dissection in all patients. CONCLUSION: Deep seating technique is a safe and effective technique without major adverse event during the transradial coronary intervention in selected cases.