Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward. PATIENTS: A total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; P = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000037981.

Peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia following cesarean delivery A narrative review.

Spinal and epidural blocks are commonly employed for pain relief during and following cesarean section. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been the gold standard for the same for many years. In recent times, many peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been tried for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery (PACD). This article has reviewed the common PNBs used for PACD. The role of PNBs along with ITM has been studied and the current best strategy for PACD has also been explored. Currently, Ilio-inguinal nerve and anterior transversus abdominis plane block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine have been found to be the most effective strategy, providing lower rest pain at 6 hours as compared to ITM alone. In patients not receiving intrathecal morphine, recommended PNBs are lateral transversus abdominis plane block, single shot local anesthetic wound infiltration, or continuous wound infiltration with catheter below rectus fascia. PNBs are recommended for PACD. They have an opioid-sparing effect and are devoid of adverse effects associated with central neuraxial blocks such as hypotension, bradycardia, and urine retention. However, caution must be observed with PNBs for possible local anesthetic toxicity due to the large volumes of drug required.

Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study.

Objective: Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section. Methods: This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data. Results: In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.

Sectio caesarea (SC) is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in health care. One of the most common risks of SC is the occurrence of postoperative pain that can interfere with mothers' physical and mental health. Therefore, the anesthesia technique used must have an optimal effect both in relieving pain during surgery and postoperatively. In addition, the side effects of the anesthesia technique used must also be minimized. This is an observational study comparing the pain relief and side effects between two anesthesia techniques that are often mentioned in the literature, namely the use of morphine in spinal anesthesia and bupivacaine in the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block. A total of 44 pregnant women who were indicated to undergo SC were divided into two groups. Pain and side effects subjectively reported by the women were monitored and documented for up to 24 hours postoperatively. Moderate-to-severe pain was an indication of additional pain relief. The results showed that the spinal anesthesia technique with morphine had a better postoperative pain relief effect, characterized by the need for less additional pain relief and a longer time interval to the first additional pain relief. Morphine-treated women experienced more mild side effects such as skin itching, nausea, and vomiting. However, this was not significant. Further research with a larger sample and consideration of other factors that may affect the mother's subjective pain perception such as histories of previous surgery, medication use, and previous pregnancy will provide more accurate comparative results.

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with or without rectus sheath block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. METHODS: The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.

Comparison of laparoscopic-guided versus ultrasound-guided TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a widely used anesthetic technique of the abdominal wall, where ultrasound guidance is considered the gold standard. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted TAP (LTAP) block with ultrasound-assisted TAP (UTAP) block for post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting, duration of the block, and bowel function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 60 patients who were randomly assigned to two groups to undergo either the LTAP or UTAP block technique after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The time taken for administering the block, post-operative nausea and vomiting, post-operative pain, respiratory rate, bowel movements, and analgesia requirements were reported. RESULTS: The time taken for the LTAP block was shorter (p < 0.001). Post-operative mean tramadol consumption, paracetamol consumption, and analgesic requirement were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.76, p = 0.513, and p = 0.26, respectively). The visual analog scale at 6, 24, and 48 h was statistically not significant (p = 0.632, p = 0.802, and p = 0.173, respectively). Nausea with vomiting and the necessity of an antiemetic medication was lower in the UTAP group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: The LTAP block is an easy and fast technique to perform in patients as an alternative method where ultrasound guidance or an anesthesiologist is not available.

ANTECEDENTES: El bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen (TAP) es una técnica anestésica de la pared abdominal ampliamente utilizada, en la cual la guía ecográfica se considera el método de referencia. OBJETIVO: Comparar la efectividad del bloqueo TAP asistido por laparoscopia (LTAP) con el bloqueo TAP asistido por ultrasonido (UTAP) para el dolor posoperatorio, las náuseas y los vómitos, y la función intestinal. MÉTODO: El estudio incluyó 60 pacientes que fueron asignados aleatoriamente a dos grupos para someterse a la técnica de bloqueo LTAP o UTAP después de una colecistectomía laparoscópica. Se informaron el tiempo de administración del bloqueo, las náuseas y los vómitos posoperatorios, el dolor posoperatorio, la frecuencia respiratoria, las evacuaciones y los requerimientos de analgesia. RESULTADOS: El tiempo de bloqueo LTAP fue menor (p < 0.001). El consumo medio de tramadol, el consumo de paracetamol y el requerimiento de analgésicos posoperatorios fueron comparables entre los dos grupos (p = 0.76, p = 0.513 y p = 0.26, respectivamente). El dolor en la escala analógica visual a las 6, 24 y 48 horas no fue estadísticamente significativo (p = 0.632, p = 0.802 y p = 0.173, respectivamente). CONCLUSIONES: El bloqueo PATL es una técnica fácil y rápida de realizar en pacientes como método alternativo cuando no se dispone de guía ecográfica o anestesióloga.

Analgesic Effect of Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III and Type II Versus Lateral Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.

Background: Appropriate pain management promotes immediate mobilization and allows the parturient to adequately care for her neonate after cesarean section (CS). Objectives: This trial objective was to compare the type III and type II quadratus lumborum block (QLB) to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) regarding postoperative analgesic effect in CS. Methods: This randomized, controlled, single-blind trial involved 60 women presenting for CS under spinal anesthesia. The patients were assigned randomly to either the QLB type III, QLB type II, or lateral TAPB group. All blocks were performed using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% bilaterally at the end of the operation with ultrasound guidance. Pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) score at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 hours. The level of patient satisfaction was graded on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Numerical rating scale measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours and total consumed meperidine in the 1st 24 hours after the operation were reduced significantly in QLB III than in QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05) with an insignificant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). The onset of the first request for analgesia was delayed significantly in QLB III, compared to QLB II and TAPB groups (P < 0.05), without a significant difference between the QLB II and TAPB groups (P > 0.05). Patient satisfaction and adverse events (e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, and hypotension) exhibited insignificant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The QLB type III ensured better analgesia as evidenced by significantly lower pain measurements and amount of meperidine in the first 24 hours after the operation with delayed time of the first rescue analgesia in comparison to QLB II and TAPB; however, QLB II and TAPB were similar.

Postoperative pain control and opioid use with transversus abdominis plane block and scheduled multimodal pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing cesarean section requires further evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain scores and opioid use in cesarean surgery patients undergoing either a TAP block and scheduled multimodal pain management (SMPM) or SMPM alone. METHODS: In this retrospective, dual cohort study, cesarean surgery patients underwent neuraxial anesthesia and a TAP block (SMPM/TAP) or SMPM; the TAP block incorporated ropivacaine (20-30 mL) administered bilaterally. The group analyses involved a comparison of postoperative pain scores using the visual analog scale and opioid consumption at 24 and 24-48 h. RESULTS: There were 94 (52.8%) patients in the SMPM/TAP group and 84 (47.2%) subjects in the SMPM alone group. At 24 h postoperatively, the SMPM/TAP group exhibited significantly lower pain scores (4.07 vs 4.54) than the SMPM group (P < 0.001) and reduced opioid consumption (2.29 vs 3.28 mg; P < 0.001). However, at 24-48 h, the SMPM group demonstrated lower pain scores (5.46 vs 5.98) compared to the SMPM/TAP group (P < 0.001) and reduced opioid consumption (8.75 vs 10.21 mg; P < 0.001); overall opioid consumption was higher (12.50 vs 12.02 mg) in the SMPM/TAP group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The TAP block improved cesarean surgery patients' pain scores and reduced opioid consumption at 24 h postoperatively but the effect of the TAP block was ephemeral as the SMPM/TAP group exhibited inferior pain scores and greater opioid consumption compared to the SMPM group at 24-48 h postoperatively.

Study on Analgesic Effects of Combined Thoracic Paravertebral Block Anesthesia or Erector Spinae Plane Block with Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Endoscopic Esophagectomy: A Clinical Anatomical Approach

SUMMARY: The application effect of transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) combined with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) or erector spinae plane block (ESP) under ultrasound guidance in endoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer under general anesthesia was studied. From March 2021 to February 2022, patients who underwent endoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer in our hospital were selected as the research object, and 90 patients were selected as the samples. Patients were divided into groupA and group B according to the difference of blocking schemes. Group A received ESP and Group B received TPVB. The dosage of sufentanil, nerve block time, awakening time and extubation time of the two groups were counted. The postoperative pain, sedation effect, sleep satisfaction and analgesia satisfaction of the two groups were compared, and the complications of the two groups were observed. The nerve block time and extubation time in group A were shorter than those in group B (P0.05). At T2, T3 and T4, the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of group A at rest and cough were significantly lower than those of group B (P0.05). The satisfaction of sleep and analgesia in group A was higher than that in group B (P0.05). The analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAPB combined with ESP is better than that of ultrasound-guided TAPB combined with TPVB, and it can shorten the time of nerve block and extubation, which is worth popularizing.

Se estudió el efecto de la aplicación del bloqueo del plano transverso del abdomen (TAPB) combinado con el bloqueo paravertebral torácico (TPVB) o el bloqueo del plano del erector de la columna (ESP) bajo guía ecográfica en la resección radical endoscópica del cáncer de esófago bajo anestesia general. Desde marzo de 2021 hasta febrero de 2022, en nuestro hospital, se seleccionaron como objeto de investigación pacientes sometidos a resección radical endoscópica de cáncer de esófago, y como muestra se seleccionaron 90 pacientes. Los pacientes se dividieron en el grupo A y el grupo B según la diferencia de esquemas de bloqueo. El grupo A recibió ESP y el grupo B recibió TPVB. Se contaron la dosis de sufentanilo, el tiempo de bloqueo nervioso, el tiempo de despertar y el tiempo de extubación de los dos grupos. Se compararon el dolor posoperatorio, el efecto de la sedación, la satisfacción del sueño y la satisfacción de la analgesia de los dos grupos y se observaron las complicaciones de los dos grupos. El tiempo de bloqueo nervioso y el tiempo de extubación en el grupo A fueron más cortos que los del grupo B (P0,05). En T2, T3 y T4, las puntuaciones de la escala visual analógica (EVA) del grupo A en repo- so y tos fueron significativamente más bajas que las del grupo B (P 0,05). La satisfacción del sueño y la analgesia en el grupo A fue mayor que en el grupo B (P0,05). El efecto analgésico de la TAPB guiada por ecografía combinada con ESP es mejor que el de la TAPB guiada por ecografía combinada con TPVB, y puede acortar el tiempo de bloqueo nervioso y extubación, lo que vale la pena popularizar.

Quadratus lumborum block vs. transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain control in patients with nephrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) on nephrectomy. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing nephrectomy. INTERVENTIONS: TAPB and QLB for postoperative analgesia. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was 24 h morphine-equivalent consumptions after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), length of hospital stay after surgery, and patient satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 883 patients were included. Seven studies compared TAPB to control, six studies compared QLB to control, and one study compared TAPB to QLB. For direct meta-analysis of the post-surgical 24 h morphine-equivalent consumption, QLB was lower than control (mean difference [95%CI]: -18.16 [-28.96, -7.37]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.001), while there was no difference between TAPB and control (mean difference [95%CI]: -8.34 [-17.84, 1.17]; I2 = 88%; p = 0.09). Network meta-analysis showed similar findings that QLB was ranked as the best anesthetic technique for reducing postoperative 24 h opioid consumption (p-score = 0.854). Moreover, in direct meta-analysis, as compared to control, the time of first postoperative rescue analgesia was prolonged after QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: 165.00 [128.99, 201.01]; p < 0.00001), but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 296.82 [-91.92, 685.55]; p = 0.13). Meanwhile, QLB can effectively reduce opioid usages at intraoperative period, as well as at postoperative 6 h and 48 h, while TAPB can only reduce opioid consumption at 6 h after surgery. As compared to control, both TAPB and QLB exhibited the reduction in PONV and pain scores at post-surgical some timepoints. Also, QLB (mean difference [95%CI]: -0.29 [-0.49, -0.08]; p = 0.006) but not TAPB (mean difference [95%CI]: 0.60 [-0.25, 1.45]; p = 0.17) exhibited the shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than control. CONCLUSIONS: QLB is more likely to be effective in reducing postoperative opioid use than TAPB, whereas both of them are superior to control with regard to the reduction in postoperative pain intensity and PONV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022358464.

Learning curve of ultrasound-guided surgeon-administered transversus abdominis plane (UGSA-TAP) block on a porcine model.

Background: Surgeons commonly perform ultrasound-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks to manage acute pain following abdominal surgeries. There is no consensus on whether surgeons should undergo basic hands-on training to perform TAP blocks or if video-based learning is sufficient. We theorized that simulation-based learning is superior to video-based learning. In the present study, we present the analysis of technical skills of UGSA-TAP block performance on a live porcine model by general surgery trainees after undergoing video or simulation-based learning. Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study. Ten surgery residents and two surgery critical-care fellows (n = 12) without prior experience in performing the TAP block were recruited. The participants were randomized either into a video-based or simulation-based training group. After that, all participants performed a TAP block on a live anesthetized pig, which was recorded and scored by three blinded anesthesiologists. All participants completed a post-performance survey to assess their confidence in gaining competency in the UGSA-TAP block. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: All simulation-based learning participants successfully performed a survey scan, identified the three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, and identified the transversus abdominis plane compared to 50 %, 50 %, and 33 % video-based learning group participants for the respective parameters (p < 0.05). While some performance metrics showed no statistically significant differences between the groups, substantial effect sizes (Cohen's ℎ up to 1.07) highlighted notable differences in participants' performance. Both groups exhibited confidence in core competencies, with varied rates of satisfactory skill execution. Performance assessed using a global rating scale revealed a higher passing rate for the simulation group (83 % vs. 33 %). Participant feedback via the Likert scale reflected confidence post-training. Inter-rater reliability (0.83-1) confirmed the robustness of study evaluations. Conclusion: The UGSA-TAP block curriculum should be introduced into the surgical residency programs with an emphasis on simulation-based learning to enhance the procedural skills of the trainees before transitioning to surgical patients.

Successful Opioid Minimization Following Kidney Transplant: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Opioid use after kidney transplant has been associated with an increased risk of death and graft loss. Several transplant centers have reported reductions in opioid use using multimodal analgesia and education. This study evaluated the impact of an opioid minimization protocol on inpatient opioid use and opioid prescribing on discharge. This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult kidney recipients transplanted from October 2021 to July 2022. Patients on chronic opioids prior to transplant were excluded. The protocol included an intra-operative ultrasound-guided lateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block combined with scheduled non-opioid analgesics and tramadol as needed. Acetaminophen 1000 mg and gabapentin 300 mg were given 1 hour prior to the procedure and continued three times daily after transplant. The gabapentin dose was reduced for patients with renal impairment. Additional analgesics including opioids could be added for uncontrolled pain. We hypothesized the protocol would decrease total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and opioid prescribing on discharge. Fifty-nine post-protocol patients were compared to 52 pre-protocol patients. After the protocol, there was a significant decrease in total inpatient MMEs per day administered and no patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices were required. In alignment with the protocol, there was a significant increase in the use of TAP blocks, acetaminophen, gabapentin, and lidocaine patches. While opioid use was lowest in post-protocol patients who received TAP blocks, significant reductions in MMEs per day were still seen in those post-protocol who did not receive TAP blocks. Opioid prescribing at the time of discharge decreased significantly after protocol. No difference was seen in patient-reported pain scores, return to operating room, readmission within 30 days, or length of stay. The use of scheduled acetaminophen and gabapentin with or without a TAP block allowed the elimination of PCA devices and led to significant minimizations in both inpatient opioid use and opioid prescribing on discharge.

Analgesic efficacy of an opioid-free postoperative pain management strategy versus a conventional opioid-based strategy following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

OBJECTIVE: In patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, the use of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (STAPB) for completely opioid-free postoperative pain management lacks convincing clinical evidence. METHODS: This study included 112 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy at the 900TH Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force from October 2020 to March 2022. Patients were randomly divided into (1:1) continuous opioid-free STAPB (C-STAPB) group and conventional group. In the C-STAPB group, 0.2% ropivacaine (bilateral, 20 ml per side) was injected intermittently every 12 h through a catheter placed on the transverse abdominis plane for postoperative pain management. The conventional group was treated with a conventional intravenous opioid pump (2.5 µg/kg sufentanil and 10 mg tropisetron, diluted to 100 ml with 0.9% NS). The primary outcomes were the accumulative area under the curve of the numeric rating scale (NRS) score at 24 and 48 h postoperatively at rest and during movement. The secondary outcomes were postoperative recovery outcomes, postoperative daily food intake, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: After exclusion (n = 16), a total of 96 patients (C-STAPB group, n = 46; conventional group, n = 49) were included. We found there were no significant differences in the cumulative AUC of NRS score PACU-24 h and PACU-48 h between the C-STAPB group and conventional group at rest [(mean difference, 1.38; 95% CI, - 2.21 to 4.98, P = 0.447), (mean difference, 1.22; 95% CI, - 6.20 to 8.65, P = 0.744)] and at movement [(mean difference, 2.90; 95% CI, - 3.65 to 9.46; P = 0.382), (mean difference, 4.32; 95% CI, - 4.46 to 13.1; P = 0.331)]. The 95% CI upper bound of the difference between rest and movement in the C-STAPB group was less than the inferior margin value (9.5 and 14 points), indicating the non-inferiority of the analgesic effect of C-STPAB. The C-STAPB group had faster postoperative recovery profiles including earlier bowel movement, defecation, more volume of food intake postoperative, and lower postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to conventional groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After laparoscopic radical gastrectomy, the analgesic effect of C-STAPBP is not inferior to the traditional opioid-based pain management model. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100051784.

De Garengeot Hernia, an acute appendicitis in the right femoral hernia canal, and successful management with transabdominal closure and appendectomy: a case Report.

Incarceration of the appendix within a femoral hernia is a rare condition of abdominal wall hernia about 0.1 to 0.5% in reported femoral hernia [1]. We report a case of a 56-year-old female whose appendix was trapped in the right femoral canal. There are few reports in the literature on entrapment of the appendix within a femoral hernia. The management of this condition includes antibiotics, drainage appendectomy, hernioplasty and mesh repair.

Combined rectus sheath block with transverse abdominis plane block by one puncture for analgesia after laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Rectus sheath block (RSB) and transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) have been shown to reduce opioid consumption and decrease postoperative pain scores in abdominal surgeries. However, there are no reports about the one-puncture technique of RSB combined with TAPB for perioperative pain management during laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: A total of 58 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (C), the TAP group (T), and the one-puncture technique of RSB combined with TAPB group (RT). The patients in group C did not receive any regional block. The patients in group T received ultrasound-guided subcostal TAPB with 30 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine on each side. The patients in the RT group received a combination of RSB and TAPB with 15 mL of 0.33% ropivacaine in each plane by one puncture technique. All patients received postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after surgeries. The range of blocks was recorded 20 min after the completion of the regional block. The postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and recovery data were recorded, including the incidence of emergence agitation (EA), the times of first exhaust and off-bed activity, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness. RESULTS: The range of the one-puncture technique in group RT covered all areas of surgical incisions. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the RT group is significantly lower at rest and during coughing compared to groups T and C at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, respectively (P < 0.05). The consumption of sufentanil and the number of postoperative compressions of the analgesic pumps at 24 and 48 h in the RT group are significantly lower than those in groups T and C (P < 0.05). The incidence of EA in the RT group is significantly lower than that in groups T and C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The one-puncture technique of RSB combined with TAPB provides effective postoperative analgesia for laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery, reduces the incidence of EA during PACU, and promotes early recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2300067271. Registered 3 Jan 2023, http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery with Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) emerging as potential techniques. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023445513). RESULTS: We included five RCTs encompassing 255 patients. QLB was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain (MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14; and p = 0.004; I2  = 94%). However, we found no difference in 24-h opioid consumption between QLB and TAPB groups. CONCLUSION: QLB may offer superior pain reduction. However, its effect on opioid consumption remains unclear.

Two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block as an equivalent alternative to thoracic epidural anaesthesia in bowel resection-an explorative cohort study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of the two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block (TS-L-TAPB) in comparison to thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and a one-stage L-TAPB (OS-L-TAPB) in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic bowel resection. METHODS: We compared a TS-L-TAPB (266 mg bupivacaine), which was performed bilaterally at the beginning and end of surgery, with two retrospective cohorts. These were patients who had undergone a TEA (ropivacaine/sufentanil) or an OS-L-TAPB (200 mg ropivacaine) at the beginning of surgery. Oral and i.v. opiate requirements were documented over the first 3 postoperative days (POD). RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups TEA (n = 23), OS-L-TAPB (n = 75), and TS-L-TAPB (n = 49). By the evening of the third POD, patients with a TEA had a higher cumulative opiate requirement with a median of 45.625 mg [0; 202.5] than patients in the OS-L-TAPB group at 10 mg [0; 245.625] and the TS-L-TAPB group at 5.625 mg [0; 215.625] (p = 0.1438). One hour after arrival in the recovery room, significantly more patients in the TEA group (100%) did not need oral and i.v. opioids than in the TS-L-TAPB (78%) and OS-L-TAPB groups (68%) (p = 0.0067).This was without clinical relevance however as the median in all groups was 0 mg. On the third POD, patients in the TEA group had a significantly higher median oral and i.v. opioid dose at 40 mg [0; 80] than the TS-L-TAPB and OS-L-TAPB groups, both at 0 mg [0; 80] (p = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: The TS-L-TAP showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits over TEA and OS-L-TAP in reducing postoperative opiate requirements.

The impact of the transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) on stress response measured through the complete blood- derived inflammatory markers.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on the blood cells and the inflammatory markers neutrophil- to- lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet- to- lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune- inflammation index (SII) after the laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOV) in dogs. 72 healthy bitches undergoing LapOV were randomly allocated to the no- TAP group of dogs under inhaled anesthesia (IA), the TAP- S group (IA and TAP with saline), and the TAP- B group (IA and TAP with bupivacaine). The NLR, PLR, and SII were calculated 1 h before ovariectomy (T0) and at 2-3 h (T1), 6-8 h (T2), and 20-24 h (T3) post- surgery. The number of dogs requiring postoperative analgesic rescue with buprenorphine and the doses administered in each group were recorded. Significant changes were observed in all groups' postoperative NLR, PLR, and SII over time. Between groups, no differences were observed in any of the ratios at any control point (NLR at T0-T3: p = 0.17, 0.36, 0.80, and 0.95; PLR at T0-T3: p = 0.70, 0.62, 0.21, 0.87; SII at T0-T3: p = 0.29, 0.65, 0.09, and 0.34). A significantly lower number of dogs required analgesic rescue in the TAP-B group (p = 0.0001) and a lower number of doses were administered (p = 0.001). There is no difference in the inflammatory response measured through the complete blood- derived inflammatory markers after the LapOV in dogs when the postoperative pain is managed entirely with opioids or with the TAP block with bupivacaine. The hydrodissection associated with the TAP block technique does not increase the inflammatory response.

Quadratus Lumborum Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Non-emergency Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Investigate the analgesic efficacy of quadratus lumborum (QL) block versus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in postoperative pain management in nonemergent cesarean section. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and gray literature were searched for evidence. Only randomized controlled trials examining the effects of QL and TAP block for nonemergent cesarean delivery were included. Mean difference (MD) was used to estimate continuous outcomes with appropriate effect models. The quality of evidence was rated using the Risk of Bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system. FINDINGS: Six studies involving 543 parturients were included. Compared to the TAP block, the cumulative 24-hour pain score at rest (MD, -0.60; 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.17; P = .007) and during activity (MD, -1.05; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.56; P < .0001) were significantly lower in QL block. Time to the first analgesic rescue (MD, 21.67; 95% CI, -18.58 to 61.91; P = .29) and opioid consumption (MD, -1.96; 95% CI, -4.59 to 0.66; P = .14) were similar in both groups. No difference was found in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and sedation. However, patients treated with QL block reported higher patient satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence to suggest that QL block is superior to TAP block for postoperative pain management in nonemergent cesarean delivery. The study limitations must be considered when extrapolating the review's findings to clinical practice.