Hiperfiltración glomerular en el paciente traumático grave / Glomerular hyperfiltration in patients with severe trauma

Antecedentes y objetivo El aclaramiento renal aumentado o hiperfiltración glomerular (HFG) puede afectar significativamente a los resultados clínicos de los fármacos eliminados por vía renal al promover la exposición subterapéutica al fármaco. La agresión sufrida en los pacientes que presentan trauma grave supone un predisponente a manifestar HFG y la identificación de estos pacientes sigue siendo un desafío clínico. El objetivo principal de este estudio fue describir la prevalencia de HFG en una cohorte de pacientes críticos traumatizados en la primera semana de ingreso. Materiales y métodos Estudio prospectivo observacional de una cohorte de pacientes adultos ingresados en la UCI de Anestesiología del Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (España) tras sufrir un trauma grave o politraumatismo. Se calculó el aclaramiento de creatinina (ClCr) en muestra de recolección de orina 4h a las 24, 72 y 168h de ingreso aplicando la fórmula ClCr: [Diuresis en ml (orina/4h)×Creatinina en orina (mg/dl)]÷[240 (minutos)×Creatinina en plasma (mg/dl)]. Un CrCl por encima de 130ml/min fue considerado HFG. Los análisis se realizaron con el software estadístico R versión 4.0.4. Resultados Se incluyeron 85 pacientes. La edad mediana de los pacientes fue de 51 años (RIQ 26); 68 pacientes fueron varones (78,82%). El 75,29% de los pacientes fueron politraumatizados; 61 pacientes (71,76%) presentaron HFG en algún momento de la determinación del ClCr. A las 24h de ingreso el 56,34% de los pacientes presentaron HFG con ClCr medio de 195,8ml/min, el 61,11% de los pacientes lo presentaban a las 72h con ClCr medio de 186ml/min y el 56,52% presentaban HFG a las 168h de ingreso con ClCr medio de 207ml/min. Se encontró una relación positiva importante (p=0,07) entre la HFG manifestada a las 72h y a las 168h. Se observó relación estadísticamente significativa entre este fenómeno con edades más jóvenes, puntuaciones ISS más bajas y creatininas plasmáticas más bajas (AU)

Background and objective Augmented renal clearance or glomerular hyperfiltration (GHF) can significantly affect the clinical outcomes of renally eliminated drugs by promoting subtherapeutic drug exposure. The aggression suffered in patients who suffer severe trauma is a predisposition to manifest GHF and the identification of these patients remains a clinical challenge. The main objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of GHF in a cohort of critically ill trauma patients. Materials and methods Prospective observational study of a cohort of adult patients admitted after suffering severe trauma or polytrauma in the Anesthesiology ICU of the University Hospital of Albacete (Spain). Creatinine clearance (ClCr) was calculated in a 4-h urine collection sample at 24, 72 and 168h after admission applying the formula: CrCl: [diuresis in ml (urine/4h)×creatinine in urine (mg/dl)]÷[240 (min)×creatinine in plasma (mg/dl)]. A CrCl above 130ml/min was considered GHF. The analyzes were performed with the statistical software R version 4.0.4. Results Eighty-five patients were included. The median age of the patients was 51 years (IQR 26). Sixty-eight patients were male (78.82%). 75.29% of the patients were polytraumatized. Sixty-one patients (71.76%) presented GHF at some point in the CrCl determination. At 24h of admission, 56.34% of the patients presented GHF with a mean CrCl of 195.8ml/min, 61.11% of the patients presented it at 72h with a mean CrCl of 186ml/min and 56.52% presented GHF at 168h of admission with a mean CrCl of 207ml/min. A significant positive relationship (p=0.07) was found between GHF manifested at 72h and at 168h. We observed a statistically significant relationship between this phenomenon with younger ages, lower ISS scores and lower plasma creatinines (AU)

Implantación de un equipo de asistencia al trauma grave. Análisis de la activación y tiempos de asistencia en pacientes ingresados en UCI / Implementation of a severe trauma assistance team: Analysis of activation and attendance times in patients admitted to the ICU

Objetivo Analizar los factores asociados a la activación del equipo de asistencia al trauma grave (EATG) en pacientes que ingresan en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI), medir su repercusión en los tiempos de asistencia, y analizar los grupos de pacientes según activación y nivel de afectación anatómica. Diseño Estudio de cohortes prospectivo del trauma grave que ingresan en UCI. Desde junio 2017 a mayo 2019. Factores de riesgo de la activación analizados con regresión logística y árbol de clasificación tipo CART. Ámbito UCI hospital de segundo nivel. Pacientes Pacientes ingresados de forma consecutiva. Intervenciones Ninguna. Variables de intereses principales Activación del EATG. Variables demográficas. Puntuación de la gravedad de la lesión (ISS), intencionalidad, mecanismo, tiempos de asistencia, complicaciones evolutivas y mortalidad. Resultados Ingresaron un total de 188 pacientes (46,8% de activación EATG), edad mediana de 52 (37-64) años (activados 47 (27-62) vs. no activados 55 (42-67) p = 0,023), varones 84,0%. No diferencias en la mortalidad según activación. El modelo logístico encuentra como factores: la atención (16,6 [2,1-13,2]) e intubación prehospitalaria (4,2 [1,8-9,8]) y, la lesión grave de extremidades inferiores (4,4 [1,6-12,3]). Padecer una caída accidental (0,2 [0,1-0,6]) hace menos probable la activación. El modelo CART selecciona el tipo de mecanismo del traumatismo y es capaz de separar los traumatismos de alta y baja energía. Conclusiones Los factores asociados con activación del ETAG fueron la atención prehospitalaria, requerir intubación previa, mecanismos de alta energía y lesiones graves de extremidades inferiores. Menores tiempos de asistencia si activación sin influir en la mortalidad. Debemos mejorar la activación en pacientes mayores con traumatismos de baja energía y sin atención prehospitalaria (AU)

Objective To analyse the factors associated with the activation of the severe trauma care team (STAT) in patients admitted to the ICU, to measure its impact on care times, and to analyse the groups of patients according to activation and level of anatomical involvement. Design Prospective cohort study of severe trauma admitted to the ICU. From June 2017 to May 2019. Risk factors for the activation of the STAT analysed with logistic regression and CART type classification tree. Setting Second level hospital ICU. Patients Patients admitted consecutively. Interventions No. Main variables of interest STAT activation, demographic variables, injury severity (ISS), intentionality, mechanism, assistance times, evolutionary complications, and mortality. Results A total of 188 patients were admitted (46.8% of STAT activation), median age of 52 (37–64) years (activated 47 (27–62) vs. not activated 55 (42–67), p = 0.023), males 84.0%. No difference in mortality according to activation. The logistic model finds as factors: care (16.6 (2.1–13.2)) and prehospital intubation (4.2 (1.8–9.8)) and severe lower extremity injury (4.4 (1.6–12.3)). Accidental fall (0.2 (0.1–0.6)) makes activation less likely. The CART model selects the type of trauma mechanism and can separate high and low energy trauma. Conclusions Factors associated with STAT activation were prehospital care, requiring prior intubation, high-energy mechanisms, and severe lower extremity injuries. Shorter care times if activated without influencing mortality. We must improve activation in older patients with low-energy trauma and without prehospital care (AU)

Variables predictoras de mortalidad precoz en pacientes hospitalizados con trauma hemorrágico / Predictors of Early Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Hemorrhagic Trauma

Introducción: La enfermedad traumática grave es la sexta causa de muerte a nivel mundial, un elevado porcentaje de fallecidos se atribuye a hemorragias no controladas. En Cuba se carece de estudios sobre variables predictoras de mortalidad precoz en pacientes hospitalizados con trauma hemorrágico. Objetivo: Identificar variables predictoras de mortalidad precoz en pacientes hospitalizados con trauma hemorrágico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, transversal, que incluyó 207 pacientes con trauma hemorrágico, en el Hospital General Provincial Camilo Cienfuegos de Sancti Spíritus, En el período comprendido entre los años 2012 y 2017. Las variables se agruparon en sociodemográficas, enfermedades crónicas, mecanismo lesional, tipo de trauma, localización topográfica, complicaciones precoces, tratamiento médico-quirúrgico y mortalidad precoz. Se elaboró un modelo de regresión logística binaria mediante el método hacia delante de Wald. Resultados: El porcentaje global del modelo de regresión logística mostró la relación entre lo pronosticado respecto a lo observado en un 94,6 por ciento. Los predictores explicaron el 83,8 por ciento de la variabilidad de la variable dependiente. Se determinaron cinco variables predictoras de mortalidad precoz, hipertensión arterial, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, hepatopatía crónica, coagulopatía aguda e hipotermia. Conclusiones: Se concluye que las enfermedades crónicas como la hipertensión arterial, la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y las hepatopatías crónicas, asociadas a la coagulopatía aguda e hipotermia fueron identificadas como variables predictoras de muerte precoz en pacientes hospitalizados por trauma hemorrágico(AU)

Introduction: Severe traumatic disease is the sixth leading cause of death worldwide, high percentage of deaths is ascribed to uncontrolled bleeding. There are no studies in Cuba on predictive variables of early mortality in hospitalized patients with hemorrhagic trauma. Objective: To identify predictive variables of early mortality in hospitalized patients with hemorrhagic trauma. Methods: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was carried out, which included 207 patients with hemorrhagic trauma, at Camilo Cienfuegos Provincial General Hospital in Sancti Spíritus, from 2012 to 2017. The variables were grouped into sociodemographic, diseases chronic, lesion mechanism, type of trauma, topographic location, early complications, medical-surgical treatment and early mortality. A binary logistic regression model was developed using the Wald forward method. Results: The global percentage of the logistic regression model showed the relationship between what was predicted with respect to what was observed in 94.6 por ciento. The predictors explained 83.8 por ciento of the variability of the dependent variable. Five predictors of early mortality, arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, acute coagulopathy, and hypothermia were determined. Conclusions: It is concluded that chronic diseases such as arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic liver disease, associated with acute coagulopathy and hypothermia, were identified as predictors of early death in patients hospitalized for hemorrhagic trauma(AU).

Características de los pacientes con choque hemorrágico traumático

Introducción: El choque hemorrágico traumático es una de las principales causas de muerte en pacientes con trauma grave. Objetivo: Describir las características de los pacientes con choque hemorrágico traumático. Métodos: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, transversal, que incluyó 207 pacientes con choque hemorrágico traumático. Para la descripción de las características de los pacientes se consideraron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y quirúrgicas. Se realizó un análisis de frecuencias, con un nivel de significación de p< 0,05 y para las variables cuantitativas se estimó la media, desviación típica. Resultados: Hubo predominio del sexo masculino (85 % de los pacientes), con una edad media de 43,7 ± 15,7 años. El 42,5 % (p= 0,000) de los pacientes eran hipertensos. Predominaron los accidentes de tránsito (63,2 %), los traumas contusos (57,5 %) y politraumatizados (42,5 %). La acidosis metabólica estuvo presente en 66,7 % (p= 0,000) de los pacientes. La media del tiempo entre ingreso y tratamiento definitivo fue de 3,52 ± 1,19 horas El tratamiento médico quirúrgico de control de daño se aplicó en el 2,9 % y 5,4 % de los pacientes respectivamente. La muerte precoz fue de 30 %. Conclusiones: Predominaron los pacientes masculinos, menores de 60 años, las complicaciones precoces que tuvieron significación estadística y el tiempo entre ingreso y comienzo del tratamiento definitivo de 3 horas y más. El tratamiento médico quirúrgico de control de daño no se aplicó con frecuencia y la muerte precoz fue elevada.

Introduction: Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is one of the main causes of death in patients with severe trauma. Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, which included 207 patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. To describe the characteristics of the patients, sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical variables were considered. A frequency analysis was performed, with a significance level of p<0.05 and for the quantitative variables the mean and standard deviation were estimated. Results: There was a predominance of the male sex (85% of the patients), with a mean age of 43.7 ± 15.7 years. 42.5% (p= 0.000) of the patients were hypertensive. Traffic accidents (63.2%), blunt trauma (57.5%) and polytraumatized (42.5%) predominated. Metabolic acidosis was present in 66.7% (p= 0.000) of the patients. The mean time between admission and definitive treatment was 3.52 ± 1.19 hours. Surgical medical treatment for damage control was applied in 2.9% and 5.4% of the patients, respectively. Early death was 30%. Conclusions: There was a predominance of male patients, under 60 years of age, more, and early complications that had statistical significance and the time between admission and the start of definitive treatment of 3 hours. Damage control surgical medical treatment was not frequently applied and early death was high.

External validation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils in patients with severe head injury. / Validación externa de la Escala de Coma de Glasgow con valoración pupilar en pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico grave.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, the GCS Pupils (GCS-P) score, and the Pupil Reactivity Score (PRS) to predict mortality in patients with severe head injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients with severe head injury and initial GCS scores of 8 or lower on initial evaluation for whom records included pupil dilation information and clinical course after admission to intensive care units of participating hospitals. We assessed the ability of each of the 3 scores (GCS, GCS-P, and PRS) to predict mortality using discrimination analysis. Discrimination was estimated by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 1551 patients with severe head injury and pupil dilation records were studied. The mean age was 50 years, 1190 (76.7%) were males, and 592 (38.2%) died. No pupil dilation was observed in 905 patients (58.3%), 362 (23.3%) had unilateral mydriasis, and 284 (18.3%) had bilateral mydriasis. The GCS-P score was significantly better at predicting mortality, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79), versus 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72) for the GCS, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.77) for the PRS. As the GCS-P score decreased, mortality increased. CONCLUSION: The GCS-P was more useful than the GCS for predicting death after severe head injury.

OBJETIVO: Analizar la capacidad para predecir la mortalidad hospitalaria de la Escala de Coma de Glasgow con valoración pupilar (GCS-P) comparado con la Escala de Coma de Glasgow (GCS) y con la escala de reactividad pupilar (PRS) en pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) grave. METODO: Análisis retrospectivo de cohortes de todos los pacientes con TCE, puntuación en la GCS # 8 en la atención inicial, datos de exploración pupilar inicial y del desenlace hospitalario ingresados en las unidades de cuidados intensivos participantes. Se determinó la capacidad predictiva de mortalidad de la GCS, PRS y la GCS-P mediante un análisis de discriminación. La discriminación se analizó empleando curvas operativas del receptor (COR), el área bajo la curva (ABC) y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC 95%). RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 1.551 pacientes con TCE grave y datos sobre exploración pupilar. La edad media fue de 50 años, 1.190 (76,7%) eran hombres, y hubo 592 (38,2%) defunciones. Hubo 905 (58,3%) pacientes sin alteraciones pupilares, 362 (23,3%) con midriasis unilateral y 284 (18,3%) pacientes con midriasis bilateral. El análisis del ABCCOR para predecir la mortalidad hospitalaria mostró de forma significativa una mejor capacidad predictiva del GCS-P con ABC = 0,77 (IC 95% 0,74-0,79) respecto al GCS con ABC = 0,69 (IC 95% 0,67-0,72). La reactividad pupilar mostró un ABC = 0,75 (IC 95% 0,72-0,77). Se observó un incremento de mortalidad con la disminución del GCS-P. CONCLUSIONES: La escala GCS-P presentó mejor rendimiento que la GCS para predecir mortalidad en el TCE grave.

Validación externa de la Escala de Coma de Glasgow con valoración pupilar en pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico grave / External validation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils in patients with severe head injury

Objetivos. Analizar la capacidad para predecir la mortalidad hospitalaria de la Escala de Coma de Glasgow con valoración pupilar (GCS-P) comparado con la Escala de Coma de Glasgow (GCS) y con la escala de reactividad pupilar (PRS) en pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico (TCE) grave. Métodos. Análisis retrospectivo de cohortes de todos los pacientes con TCE, puntuación en la GCS # 8 en la atención inicial, datos de exploración pupilar inicial y del desenlace hospitalario ingresados en las unidades de cuidados intensivos participantes. Se determinó la capacidad predictiva de mortalidad de la GCS, PRS y la GCS-P mediante un análisis de discriminación. La discriminación se analizó empleando curvas operativas del receptor (COR), el área bajo la curva (ABC) y su intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC 95%). Resultados. Se analizaron 1.551 pacientes con TCE grave y datos sobre exploración pupilar. La edad media fue de 50 años, 1.190 (76,7%) eran hombres, y hubo 592 (38,2%) defunciones. Hubo 905 (58,3%) pacientes sin alteraciones pupilares, 362 (23,3%) con midriasis unilateral y 284 (18,3%) pacientes con midriasis bilateral. El análisis del ABCCOR para predecir la mortalidad hospitalaria mostró de forma significativa una mejor capacidad predictiva del GCS-P con ABC = 0,77 (IC 95% 0,74-0,79) respecto al GCS con ABC = 0,69 (IC 95% 0,67-0,72). La reactividad pupilar mostró un ABC = 0,75 (IC 95% 0,72-0,77). Se observó un incremento de mortalidad con la disminución del GCS-P. Conclusiones. La escala GCS-P presentó mejor rendimiento que la GCS para predecir mortalidad en el TCE grave. (AU)

Objectives. To compare the ability of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, the GCS Pupils (GCS-P) score, and the Pupil Reactivity Score (PRS) to predict mortality in patients with severe head injury. Methods. Retrospective analysis of all patients with severe head injury and initial GCS scores of 8 or lower on initial evaluation for whom records included pupil dilation information and clinical course after admission to intensive care units of participating hospitals. We assessed the ability of each of the 3 scores (GCS, GCS-P, and PRS) to predict mortality using discrimination analysis. Discrimination was estimated by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and 95% CIs. Results. A total of 1551 patients with severe head injury and pupil dilation records were studied. The mean age was 50 years, 1190 (76.7%) were males, and 592 (38.2%) died. No pupil dilation was observed in 905 patients (58.3%), 362 (23.3%) had unilateral mydriasis, and 284 (18.3%) had bilateral mydriasis. The GCS-P score was significantly better at predicting mortality, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79), versus 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.72) for the GCS, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.77) for the PRS. As the GCS-P score decreased, mortality increased. Conclusion. The GCS-P was more useful than the GCS for predicting death after severe head injury. (AU)

Implementation of a major trauma team. Analysis of activation and care times in patients admitted to the ICU.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors associated with the activation of the severe trauma care team (STAT) in patients admitted to the ICU, to measure its impact on care times, and to analyze the groups of patients according to activation and level of anatomical involvement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of severe trauma admitted to the ICU. From June 2017 to May 2019. Risk factors for the activation of the STAT analysed with logistic regression and CART type classification tree. SETTING: Second level hospital ICU. PATIENTS: Patients admitted consecutively. INTERVENTIONS: No. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: STAT activation. Demographic variables. Injury severity (ISS), intentionality, mechanism, assistance times, evolutionary complications, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients were admitted (46.8% of STAT activation), median age of 52 (37-64) years (activated 47 (27-62) vs not activated 55 (42-67) P = 0.023), males 84.0%. No difference in mortality according to activation. The logistic model finds as factors: care (16.6 (2.1-13.2)) and prehospital intubation (4.2 (1.8-9.8)) and severe lower extremity injury (4.4 (1.6-12.3)). Accidental fall (0.2 (0.1-0.6)) makes activation less likely. The CART model selects the type of trauma mechanism and can separate high and low energy trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Factors associated with STAT activation were prehospital care, requiring prior intubation, high-energy mechanisms, and severe lower extremity injuries. Shorter care times if activated without influencing mortality. We must improve activation in older patients with low-energy trauma and without prehospital care.

Glomerular hyperfiltration in patients with severe trauma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Augmented renal clearance or glomerular hyperfiltration (GHF) can significantly affect the clinical outcomes of renally eliminated drugs by promoting subtherapeutic drug exposure. The aggression suffered in patients who suffer severe trauma is a predisposition to manifest GHF and the identification of these patients remains a clinical challenge. The main objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of GHF in a cohort of critically ill trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of a cohort of adult patients admitted after suffering severe trauma or polytrauma in the Anesthesiology ICU of the University Hospital of Albacete (Spain). Creatinine clearance (ClCr) was calculated in a 4-h urine collection sample at 24, 72 and 168 h after admission applying the formula; CrCl: [Diuresis in ml (urine/4 h) × Creatinine in urine (mg/dl)] ÷ [240 (minutes) × Creatinine in plasma (mg/dl)]. A CrCl above 130 mL/min was considered GHF. The analyses were performed with the statistical software R version 4.0.4. RESULTS: 85 patients were included. The median age of the patients was 51 years (IQR 26), 78.82% male. 68 patients were male (78.82%). 75.29% of the patients were polytraumatized. 61 patients (71.76%) presented GHF at some point in the CrCl determination. At 24 h of admission, 56.34% of the patients presented GHF with a mean CrCl of 195.8 ml/min, 61.11% of the patients presented it at 72 h with a mean CrCl of /min and 56.52% presented GHF at 168 h of admission with a mean CrCl of 207 ml/min. A significant positive relationship (p = 0.07) was found between GHF manifested at 72 h and at 168 h. We observed a statistically significant relationship between this phenomenon with younger ages, lower ISS scores and lower plasma creatinines. CONCLUSIONS: GHF are a common condition in critically ill patients admitted for severe trauma. We recommend the use of CrCl to assess renal function and make dosage adjustments. Studies are required to understand the clinical impact of these phenomena on drug elimination and to be able to establish the ideal dosage in those cases.

Factores asociados con la mortalidad en pacientes traumáticos con puntuación de 3 en la escala de coma de Glasgow y midriasis bilateral arreactiva / Factors associated with death due to trauma in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed dilated pupils

Objetivo. Comparar los pacientes traumáticos con una puntuación de 3 en la escala de coma de Glasgow (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS) en función de la reactividad pupilar e investigar los factores asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria en los pacientes con GCS 3 y midriasis bilateral arreactiva.Método. Estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes traumáticos recogidos con GCS 3 ingresados en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) participantes desde marzo 2015 hasta diciembre 2019. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística para el estudio de los factores asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con GCS 3 puntos y midriasis bilateral arreactiva.Resultados. De los 933 pacientes con GCS 3 puntos, 454 (48,7%) presentaron pupilas simétricas y reactivas, 201 (21,5%) anisocoria arreactiva y 278 (29,8%) midriasis bilateral arreactiva. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue elevada en los 3 grupos: 32,5% con pupilas normales, 54,6% con anisocoria arreactiva y 91,0% con midriasis bilateral arreactiva. La edad, la puntación de 3 o más en el Abbreviated Injury Scale (cabeza) y el shock o shock refractario se aso-ciaron de forma significativa con la mortalidad hospitalaria, siendo la lesión difusa tipo I y II y la lesión masa evacuada factores protectores en los pacientes con 3 puntos en la GCS y midriasis bilateral arreactiva. De los 26 pacientes que sobrevivieron con GCS 3 y midriasis bilateral arreactiva, 12 (46,1%) tuvieron un GCS de 14-15 al alta hospitalaria.Conclusiones. La mortalidad hospitalaria de los pacientes traumáticos con 3 puntos en la GCS y midriasis bilateral arreactiva fue del 91%. La edad, la puntación de 3 o más en el Abbreviated Injury Scale (cabeza) y el shock o shock refractario se asociaron de forma significativa con la mortalidad hospitalaria, siendo la lesión difusa tipo I y II, y la lesión masa evacuada factores protectores en este grupo de pacientes. (AU)

Objectives. To compare patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 stratified according to pupillary reaction and to explore factors associated with in-hospital death in those with bilateral fixed dilated pupils.Methods. Prospective, observational, multicenter study. We included all patients with trauma and GCS scores of 3 admitted to the intensive care unit from March 2015 to December 2019. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the patients with bilateral dilated pupils were explored using multiple regression analysis.Results. Of the 933 patients included, 454 (48.7%) had responsive pupils, 201 (21.5%) had a single fixed dilated pupil, and 278 (29.8%) had bilateral dilation. Hospital mortality was high in all 3 groups: 32.5% in those with normal responsive pupils, 54.6% in those with a single unreactive pupil, and 91.0% in those with bilateral dilation. Factors significantly associated with in-hospital death were age, a score of 3 or more on the Abbreviated Injury Scale for the head, and shock or refractory shock. Types I or II diffuse lesions and evacuated mass lesions were protective in patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils. Twelve of the 26 patients (46.1%) with bilateral dilated pupils and GCS scores of 3 had GCS scores of 14 or 15 on discharge from the hospital.Conclusions. The in-hospital mortality was 91% in this study of trauma patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils. Factors significantly associated with in-hospital death were age, a score of 3 or more on the Abbreviated Injury Scale for the head, and shock or refractory shock. Types I or II diffuse lesions and evacuated mass lesions were protective in patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils. (AU)

Factors associated with death due to trauma in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 and bilateral fixed dilated pupils. / Factores asociados con la mortalidad en pacientes traumáticos con puntuación de 3 en la escala de coma de Glasgow y midriasis bilateral arreactiva.

OBJECTIVES: To compare patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3 stratified according to pupillary reaction and to explore factors associated with in-hospital death in those with bilateral fixed dilated pupils. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, observational, multicenter study. We included all patients with trauma and GCS scores of 3 admitted to the intensive care unit from March 2015 to December 2019. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the patients with bilateral dilated pupils were explored using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 933 patients included, 454 (48.7%) had responsive pupils, 201 (21.5%) had a single fixed dilated pupil, and 278 (29.8%) had bilateral dilation. Hospital mortality was high in all 3 groups: 32.5% in those with normal responsive pupils, 54.6% in those with a single unreactive pupil, and 91.0% in those with bilateral dilation. Factors significantly associated with in-hospital death were age, a score of 3 or more on the Abbreviated Injury Scale for the head, and shock or refractory shock. Types I or II diffuse lesions and evacuated mass lesions were protective in patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils. Twelve of the 26 patients (46.1%) with bilateral dilated pupils and GCS scores of 3 had GCS scores of 14 or 15 on discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSION: The in-hospital mortality was 91% in this study of trauma patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils. Factors significantly associated with in-hospital death were age, a score of 3 or more on the Abbreviated Injury Scale for the head, and shock or refractory shock. Types I or II diffuse lesions and evacuated mass lesions were protective in patients with GCS scores of 3 and bilateral dilated pupils.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los pacientes traumáticos con una puntuación de 3 en la escala de coma de Glasgow (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS) en función de la reactividad pupilar e investigar los factores asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria en los pacientes con GCS 3 y midriasis bilateral arreactiva. METODO: Estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes traumáticos recogidos con GCS 3 ingresados en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) participantes desde marzo 2015 hasta diciembre 2019. Se realizó un análisis de regresión logística para el estudio de los factores asociados a la mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con GCS 3 puntos y midriasis bilateral arreactiva. RESULTADOS: De los 933 pacientes con GCS 3 puntos, 454 (48,7%) presentaron pupilas simétricas y reactivas, 201 (21,5%) anisocoria arreactiva y 278 (29,8%) midriasis bilateral arreactiva. La mortalidad hospitalaria fue elevada en los 3 grupos: 32,5% con pupilas normales, 54,6% con anisocoria arreactiva y 91,0% con midriasis bilateral arreactiva. La edad, la puntación de 3 o más en el Abbreviated Injury Scale (cabeza) y el shock o shock refractario se asociaron de forma significativa con la mortalidad hospitalaria, siendo la lesión difusa tipo I y II y la lesión masa evacuada factores protectores en los pacientes con 3 puntos en la GCS y midriasis bilateral arreactiva. De los 26 pacientes que sobrevivieron con GCS 3 y midriasis bilateral arreactiva, 12 (46,1%) tuvieron un GCS de 14-15 al alta hospitalaria. CONCLUSIONES: La mortalidad hospitalaria de los pacientes traumáticos con 3 puntos en la GCS y midriasis bilateral arreactiva fue del 91%. La edad, la puntación de 3 o más en el Abbreviated Injury Scale (cabeza) y el shock o shock refractario se asociaron de forma significativa con la mortalidad hospitalaria, siendo la lesión difusa tipo I y II, y la lesión masa evacuada factores protectores en este grupo de pacientes.

Experiência vivida pelos enfermeiros líderes de equipas de emergência extra-hospitalar perante a pessoa com trauma grave / Experience lived by nurses leaders of extra-hospital emergency teams before the person with severe trauma

Os meios de ambulância de Suporte Imediato de Vida (SIV) têm acrescentado responsabilidade aos enfermeiros como líderes de equipas de emergência em extra-hospitalar (EEH), para a diminuição da morbi-mortalidade por lesões traumáticas. Porém, o modo como lidam com tal acréscimo de responsabilidade é parcamente conhecido, justificando o estudo das suas vivências naquele contexto. Para tal, traçamos como objetivos: descrever a vivência de experiências perante a pessoa com trauma grave pelos enfermeiros líderes de equipas de EEH; identificar os aspetos que influenciam essa vivência; identificar os significados que os enfermeiros líderes de equipas de EEH atribuem àquelas experiências. Optamos por um estudo fenomenológico descritivo, segundo o método de Giorgi. Aos enfermeiros que exercem funções nos meios de ambulância de SIV foi enviado um e-mail com o link de acesso ao questionário de resposta aberta, e solicitado o respetivo reenvio a outros colegas, numa amostragem intencional do tipo ?bola de neve?. A amostra foi constituída por onze enfermeiros. A análise dos dados seguiu os pressupostos de Giorgi (2012b) e as sugestões de Loureiro (2002), tendo sido respeitados os princípios éticos e deontológicos aplicáveis. Identificamos que os enfermeiros descrevem dois focos de preocupação: a tomada de decisão e a liderança. Estes são influenciados por fatores internos e externos, como a experiência profissional ou o conhecimento técnico-científico, e a idade da pessoa ou a duração do desencarceramento, respetivamente. Apontam o treino e formação contínuos como estratégia para colmatar a sua inexperiência e insegurança. Este estudo permite-nos concluir que a vivência de experiências perante a pessoa com trauma grave pelos enfermeiros líderes de equipas de EEH resulta de uma intricada e dinâmica relação entre condicionantes e contribui para o seu desenvolvimento profissional e obtenção de ganhos em saúde.

Tranexamic acid in trauma patients in the emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis. / Ácido tranexámico en pacientes con traumatismo en servicios de urgencias y emergencias: revisión sistemática y metanálisis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy (mortality and functional status) and safety of emergency department (ED) use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with severe trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to find relevant clinical trials published between January 1, 2008, and 1 August, 2018. The selected trials included trauma patients who received infusions of TXA within 8 hours. We extracted patient-related clinical variables and treatment variables. The main outcomes were mortality and functional status. RESULTS: Five clinical trials were included in the systematic review. Four of them (20 697 patients) were included in the metaanalysis. We found that TXA versus placebo was associated with lower mortality (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.96]; P = .004; 2 = 0%) and better functional status (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.94]; P = .02; I2 = 0%). However, intensive care unit stays were longer in patients administered TXA (mean difference, 2.55 days [95% CI, 0.04-5.06 days]; P = .05; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: ED infusion of TXA decreases mortality after severe trauma and improves patients' functional status.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar, en términos de mortalidad y estado funcional, la eficacia y seguridad de la administración de ácido tranexámico (TXA) en los pacientes que sufren un traumatismo grave en los servicios de urgencias y emergencias. METODO: Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Las bases de datos consultadas fueron Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science y TheClinicalTrials.gov. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos publicados entre el 1 de enero de 2008 y el 1 de agosto de 2018 en los que participaran pacientes que sufrían un traumatismo y a los que se les administró TXA en las primeras 8 horas tras este. Se extrajeron variables clínicas relacionadas con los pacientes y con la intervención. Las variables de resultado principales fueron la mortalidad y el estado funcional. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 5 ensayos clínicos para la revisión sistemática y 4 para el metanálisis (20.697 pacientes). Se detectó una disminución de la mortalidad (OR 0,89 [IC 95% 0,83-0,96]; p = 0,004; I2 = 0%) y un mejor estado funcional (OR 0,60 [IC 95% 0,39-0,94]; p = 0,02; I2 = 0%) tras la administración de TXA en estos pacientes en comparación con placebo. Por el contrario, se encontró una estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos más larga (diferencia de medias 2,55 días [IC 95% 0,04-5,06]; p = 0,05; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONES: La administración de TXA disminuye la mortalidad de los pacientes con traumatismo grave y mejora su estado funcional.

Algunas consideraciones en torno a la atención del paciente politraumatizado / Some considerations about the polytraumatized patient care

Objetivos: conceptualizar el politraumatismo a la luz de los conocimientos vigentes, su génesis, la conducta a seguir durante la atención prehospitalaria y hospitalaria, la determinación de los índices de severidad relacionados con la mortalidad y sus causas, así como el tratamiento mediante equipos de trabajo multidisciplinarios especializados. Métodos: revisión documental de la bibliografía médica nacional y extranjera del presente siglo, mediante el buscador Google académico, las bases de datos Scielo, Lilacs, Pubmed, en idiomas inglés y español. Desarrollo: en la actualidad constituye un verdadero problema científico la diversidad de criterios sobre la atención de los politraumatizados en general y de los graves, en particular, porque continúan siendo un problema de salud para la población, pues suelen recibirlos fundamentalmente los varones en edades productivas de la vida, por lo general mediante accidentes y/o agresiones y requieren gran cantidad de recursos para su atención, necesitan un tratamiento precoz, intensivo y multidisciplinario, a pesar de mantener altas tasas de letalidad y mortalidad. Conclusiones: la evaluación precoz de la gravedad del trauma, permite tratar adecuadamente y con inmediatez a los lesionados y posibilita mejorar su pronóstico, debido a que se cuenta con equipos de trabajo altamente especializados, podrá elevarse la calidad asistencial y, con esa premisa, el índice de supervivencia de estos enfermos(AU)

Objectives: To conceptualize polytrauma in the light of current knowledge, its genesis, the management during prehospital and hospital care, the severity indexes related to mortality and its causes, as well as the treatment by specialized multidisciplinary teams. Methods: Documents review from national and foreign medical bibliography of this century, through the academic Google search engine, the Scielo, Lilacs, Pubmed databases, in English and Spanish. Body: At present the diversity of criteria on the care of polytraumatized in general and of the severe ones is a real scientific problem, in particular, because they continue to be a health problem for the population, since they are usually suffered by men of productive ages, usually by accidents and / or assaults and require a large amount of resources for their care, they need early, intensive and multidisciplinary treatment, despite maintaining high rates of lethality and mortality. Conclusions: the early assessment of the severity of the trauma allows the injured to be treated adequately and immediately, and it makes it possible to improve their prognosis, due to the fact that highly specialized work teams are available, the quality of care can be increased and, with that premise, the survival rate of these patients(AU)

Algunas especificidades concernientes al paciente politraumatizado grave / Some Specifics Concerning About Severe Trauma Patient

El trauma se produce con patrones definidos que permiten identificar factores de riesgo como género (masculino), edad (las extremas de la vida), nivel socioeconómico (bajo), uso de sustancias peligrosas y adictivas, problemas psicológicos y escasa educación relacionada con la seguridad. La mortalidad por lesiones traumáticas graves se mantiene alta. La evaluación precoz de la severidad del trauma permite tratar adecuadamente y con inmediatez a los lesionados, mejorar el pronóstico y lograr que egresen vivos la mayoría de ellos. Por esas razones, constituye un tema de actualidad continuar profundizando sobre sus aspectos cognoscitivos en general, y los relacionados con las principales características de los politraumatizados graves, en particular. Solo contando con equipos multidisciplinarios altamente capacitados y con los recursos necesarios para su atención pre hospitalaria y luego de su hospitalización, puede lograrse la disminución de la mortalidad por esta causa(AU)

Trauma occurs with defined patterns that identify risk factors as gender (male), age (the end of life), socioeconomic stratus (low), use of dangerous and addictive substances, psychological problems and poor education related to safety. Mortality from severe traumatic injuries remains high. Early assessment of trauma severity allows proper and immediate treatment of the injured patient, as well as improving prognosis and achieving that most of patients are alive at discharge. For these reasons, it is a topical issue continue to deepen on its cognitive aspects in general and those related to the main characteristics of severe trauma patients in particular. Decrease in mortality by this cause can be only achieved with highly trained multidisciplinary teams and resources for pre and post hospital care(AU)

Algunas especificidades concernientes al paciente politraumatizado grave / Some Specifics Concerning About Severe Trauma Patient

El trauma se produce con patrones definidos que permiten identificar factores de riesgo como género (masculino), edad (las extremas de la vida), nivel socioeconómico (bajo), uso de sustancias peligrosas y adictivas, problemas psicológicos y escasa educación relacionada con la seguridad. La mortalidad por lesiones traumáticas graves se mantiene alta. La evaluación precoz de la severidad del trauma permite tratar adecuadamente y con inmediatez a los lesionados, mejorar el pronóstico y lograr que egresen vivos la mayoría de ellos. Por esas razones, constituye un tema de actualidad continuar profundizando sobre sus aspectos cognoscitivos en general, y los relacionados con las principales características de los politraumatizados graves, en particular. Solo contando con equipos multidisciplinarios altamente capacitados y con los recursos necesarios para su atención pre hospitalaria y luego de su hospitalización, puede lograrse la disminución de la mortalidad por esta causa(AU)

Trauma occurs with defined patterns that identify risk factors as gender (male), age (the end of life), socioeconomic stratus (low), use of dangerous and addictive substances, psychological problems and poor education related to safety. Mortality from severe traumatic injuries remains high. Early assessment of trauma severity allows proper and immediate treatment of the injured patient, as well as improving prognosis and achieving that most of patients are alive at discharge. For these reasons, it is a topical issue continue to deepen on its cognitive aspects in general and those related to the main characteristics of severe trauma patients in particular. Decrease in mortality by this cause can be only achieved with highly trained multidisciplinary teams and resources for pre and post hospital care(AU)

Epidemiology of severe trauma in Spain. Registry of trauma in the ICU (RETRAUCI). Pilot phase. / Epidemiología del trauma grave en España. REgistro de TRAuma en UCI (RETRAUCI). Fase piloto.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and management of severe trauma disease in Spanish Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Registry of trauma in the ICU (RETRAUCI). Pilot phase. DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter registry. SETTING: Thirteen Spanish ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients with trauma disease admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Epidemiology, out-of-hospital attention, registry of injuries, resources utilization, complications and outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients, n=2242. Mean age 47.1±19.02 years. Males 79%. Blunt trauma 93.9%. Injury Severity Score 22.2±12.1, Revised Trauma Score 6.7±1.6. Non-intentional in 84.4% of the cases. The most common causes of trauma were traffic accidents followed by pedestrian and high-energy falls. Up to 12.4% were taking antiplatelet medication or anticoagulants. Almost 28% had a suspected or confirmed toxic influence in trauma. Up to 31.5% required an out-of-hospital artificial airway. The time from trauma to ICU admission was 4.7±5.3hours. At ICU admission, 68.5% were hemodynamically stable. Brain and chest injuries predominated. A large number of complications were documented. Mechanical ventilation was used in 69.5% of the patients (mean 8.2±9.9 days), of which 24.9% finally required a tracheostomy. The median duration of stay in the ICU and in hospital was 5 (range 3-13) and 9 (5-19) days, respectively. The ICU mortality rate was 12.3%, while the in-hospital mortality rate was 16.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The pilot phase of the RETRAUCI offers a first impression of the epidemiology and management of trauma disease in Spanish ICUs.

Are the paradigms in trauma disease changing?

Despite an annual trauma mortality of 5 million people worldwide, resulting in countless physical disabilities and enormous expenses, there are no standardized guidelines on trauma organization and management. Over the last few decades there have been very notorious improvements in severe trauma care, though organizational and economical aspects such as research funding still need to be better engineered. Indeed, trauma lags behind other serious diseases in terms of research and organization. The rapid developments in trauma care have produced original models available for research projects, initial resuscitation protocols and radiological procedures such as CT for the initial management of trauma patients, among other advances. This progress underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the initial management and follow-up of this complicated patient population, where intensivists play a major role in both the patient admission and subsequent care at the trauma unit.

Epidemiology of severe trauma.

Major injury is the sixth leading cause of death worldwide. Among those under 35 years of age, it is the leading cause of death and disability. Traffic accidents alone are the main cause, fundamentally in low- and middle-income countries. Patients over 65 years of age are an increasingly affected group. For similar levels of injury, these patients have twice the mortality rate of young individuals, due to the existence of important comorbidities and associated treatments, and are more likely to die of medical complications late during hospital admission. No worldwide, standardized definitions exist for documenting, reporting and comparing data on severely injured trauma patients. The most common trauma scores are the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury severity Score (TRISS). Documenting the burden of injury also requires evaluation of the impact of post-trauma impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Trauma epidemiology helps define health service and research priorities, contributes to identify disadvantaged groups, and also facilitates the elaboration of comparable measures for outcome predictions.

Multiorgan failure in the serious trauma patient.

Multiorgan failure remains one of the leading causes of late morbidity and mortality after severe trauma. In the early phase, it is related with an uncontrolled hyper-inflammation state, whereas in the late phase (>72 h), septic complications play a major role. We review the underlying pathophysiology, the evaluation with different scales and the clinical factors associated with multiorgan failure, as well as potential treatment options.

Escala de coma de Glasgow: origen, análisis y uso apropiado / Glasgow Coma Scale: Origin, analysis, and appropriate use

Introducción: Las enfermeras con frecuencia son responsables de la clasificación inmediata y la evaluación inicial de los pacientes con traumatismo craneoencefálico. El reconocimiento precoz de los signos del daño cerebral es fundamental para permitir la prestación de tratamientos oportunos. Objetivo: Identificarla utilidad clínica de la escala de coma de Glasgow (GCS, por sus siglas en inglés, Glasgow Coma Scale) y determinar el uso apropiado por el personal de Enfermería. Métodos: Para la búsqueda de información se seleccionaron 3 de las principales bases de datos en el área de la salud: Medline, CINHAL y BVS. Los descriptores empleados fueron: Glasgow coma scale, brain injuries, coma, trauma severity, nursing assessment, neurologic assessment, la búsqueda se limitó a 10 años, sólo en población adulta. Resultados: La GCS es un instrumento con alta sensibilidad para la valoración en pacientes con daño cerebral. Se han observado diversas fallas e inconsistencias al momento de su uso e interpretación como suponer condiciones clínicas más graves de lo que en verdad se presentan, o por el contrario, pasar por alto datos de deterioro neurológico; sin embargo, se ha demostrado que al haber un entrenamiento continuo acerca del uso de esta escala se genera una mejora significativa en las evaluaciones y el reporte de resultados entre evaluadores. Conclusiones: La valoración de Glasgow se compone de 3 subescalas que califican de manera individual 3 aspectos de la consciencia: la apertura ocular, la respuesta verbal y la respuesta motora; el puntaje se da con base en la mejor respuesta obtenida de cada uno de estos rubros. Su propósito es alertar al personal médico y de Enfermería ante alguna alteración neurológica del paciente. Proporciona un lenguaje común y objetivo para mejorar la comunicación en el reporte de los resultados conseguidos. Actualmente, es el parámetro más usado tanto en el ámbito hospitalario como en el campo prehospitalario.

Introduction: nurses are frequently responsible of immediate classification and initial as-sessment of patients suffering from a cranium encephalic traumatism. Early acknowledgement of brain damage signs is fundamental to offer timely treatments. Objective: To identify the usefulness of the Glasgow Coma Scale, and determine its appropriate use by the nursing staff. Methods: information search was performed through 3 main health databases: Medline, CINHAL and BVS. The search words used were Glasgow coma scale, brain injuries, coma, trauma severity, nursing assessment, and neurologic assessment. The search was limited to 10 years, and considering only in the adult population. Results: the Glasgow coma scale is a highly sensible instrument to assess patients with some de-gree of brain injuries. Some failures and inconsistencies in its use and interpretation have been observed, such as supposing worse clinical conditions than the real ones, or on the other hand, underestimate the neurological impairment; however, it has been demonstrated that a continuous training on the use of this scale significantlyimproves the assessments and the results outcomes. Conclusions: the Glasgow coma scale has 3 sub-scales which individually estimate 3 aspects of consciousness: ocular aperture, verbal response, and motor response. The fnal score is made up with the best responses in the 3 sub-scales. the objective is to alert the medical and nursing staff regarding any neurologic alteration in the patient. the scale has a common and objective language in order to improve the communication from the results, and at present, it is the most widely used parameter both in the hospital and pre-hospital scenarios.