Peri-implant fractures after Intramedullary fixation for femoral trochanteric fracture: a multicenter (TRON Group) study.

BACKGROUND: With the rise in elderly populations, the incidence of femoral trochanteric fractures has also increased. Although intramedullary nail therapy is commonly used, the incidence of peri-implant fractures (PIFs) as a complication and its associated factors are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of PIFs and treatment strategies and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study across 11 hospitals from 2016 to 2020 examined 1855 patients with femoral trochanter fracture. After excluding 69 patients treated without intramedullary nailing, 1786 patients were analyzed. Parameters studied included age, sex, body mass index, medical history, and treatment methods. PIFs were categorized using the Chan classification. Treatment outcomes and patient mobility were assessed using the Parker Mobility Score, and postoperative complications and one-year survival data were compiled. RESULTS: The incidence of PIFs was 8 in 1786 cases. Chan classification showed 1 case of N1A, 6 of N2A, and 1 of N2B. Only the type N1 case was a transverse fracture, whereas all cases of type N2 were oblique fractures. Among these cases, five patients had fractures extending to the upper part of the femoral condyle. The patient with N1A and one bedridden patient with N2A fracture underwent conservative treatment, one patient with N2A in which the fracture did not extend to the condyle was treated with nail replacement, and 5 patients (N2A: 4, N2B: 1) with fractures extending to the condyle were treated with additional plate fixation. All patients had survived at one year after treatment for PIF, and no reoperations were required. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PIF was very low (0.45%). Of the 6 PIF cases, excluding the bedridden patients, the treatment of choice for PIF was an additional plate if the fracture line extended to the femoral condyle; otherwise, the nail was replaced. All patients achieved bony fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV.

The hip fracture incidence in the high-risk area Oslo continues to decline.

Oslo in Norway has had the highest incidence of hip fractures in the world. The incidence in Oslo has been thoroughly described every decade since the late 1970s. The incidence in Oslo has previously been higher compared to the rest of Norway but has now decreased to a level below the country average. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of hip fractures in Oslo in 2019 and compare it with the incidence rates from the previous four decades. METHODS: Patients residing in Oslo in 2019 with a new hip fracture identified by searching the Oslo hospital's patient administrative systems and protocols from the operating theaters. The diagnosis was verified through medical records and/or radiographs. To compare with previous studies, the direct standardization method was used with the population of Oslo in 2019 as the standard. RESULTS: A total of 758 hip fractures, 70% women, were identified in 2019. The age-standardized incidence rates per 10,000 person-years in 2019 (95% CI) were 45 (41.1-48.8) for women and 30 (25.8-33.8) for men. In women, there has been a continuous decline in age-standardized rates the last three decades and in men the last two decades. The most pronounced decline was seen in the oldest age groups over 70 years. There has been a secular decline in both cervical and trochanteric fractures; however, the decrease in trochanteric fractures was most distinct for males, with more than two times higher risk in 1996/1997 compared to 2019. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates for hip fractures in Oslo in 2019 were the lowest rate reported since 1978. The decrease was significant for both men and women. For the first time, the incidence rates are below the national rates of Norway. However, the rates are still among the highest worldwide.

Early surgery within 48 hours of admission for hip fracture did not improve 1-year mortality in Japan: a single-institution cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Early surgery for hip fracture, within 48 hours of hospital admission, is effective in reducing mortality. However, the average preoperative waiting time for hip fractures in Japan is 4.5 days and the 1-year mortality rate after a hip fracture is 10% in Japan. This study aimed to investigate whether early surgery, within 48 hours, could reduce the 1-year mortality rate in patients with hip fractures in Japan. METHODS: This cohort study involved 402 consecutive patients with hip fractures who underwent surgical treatment between January 2013 and September 2019. The exclusion criteria were an age of <60 years and in-hospital injury. A total of 389 patients were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent early surgery within 48 hours of admission (early group) and those who di not undergo early surgery (delayed group). We compared patient characteristics and treatment outcomes between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A comparison of patient characteristics revealed that the early group had lower hemoglobin levels (P=0.046), lower C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.031), lower numbers of patients with weekend hospitalization, lower numbers of patients with a history of using medications that may cause bleeding (P < 0.01), and who received general anaesthesia (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant differences with regard to the other variables between the 2 groups. A treatment outcome analysis showed that the early group had shorter waiting times for surgery (P < 0.01) and shorter stays in acute-care wards (P < 0.01). However there were no differences in the total hospital stay, Barthel index at discharge, home discharge rates, in-hospital mortality rates, and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that early surgery did not reduce the 1-year mortality rate in older patients with hip fractures in Japan.

Biomechanical evaluation of a modified intramedullary nail for the treatment of unstable femoral trochanteric fractures.

Background: The Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) device is the most commonly used implant to fix unstable femoral trochanteric fractures (UFTFs), but it has a relatively high incidence of complications. Due to this factor, the modified intramedullary nail (MIN) was created to treat patients with UFTFs. The aim was to exhibit the MIN and make a comparison with PFNA and InterTAN using biomechanical methods. Methods: An adult UFTF model was developed using Mimics software. The PFNA, InterTAN nail, and MIN models were drawn referring to the corresponding parameters and installed in the fracture models. Vertical, anteroposterior (AP) bending, and torsion loads of the femoral head were set in advance and loaded onto the fracture models. The value of maximal displacement and von Mises stress was evaluated via finite element analysis (FEA). Results: The MIN model had smaller values for maximal displacement than that of the PFNA model, and the increase in displacement was less pronounced for the MIN compared to PFNA under increasing vertical loads. For the indicator of von Mises stress, the MIN model showed lower stress compared with the PFNA model in vertical loads ranging from 300 N to 2100 N. Except for the maximal stress at implants under AP bending loads, the MIN demonstrated the most superior biomechanical properties under AP bending and torsional loads. Conclusion: The MIN offered obvious advantages in terms of mechanical stability and stress distribution among the three studied implants, providing a promising implant option for patients with UFTFs.

Background factors for intra-operative hypotension during hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly under spinal anesthesia managed by orthopedic surgeons: A retrospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is used for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery, but frequently induces hypotension and the causative factors remain unclear. We examined background factors for the use of an intraoperative vasopressor in elderly patients receiving spinal anesthesia for femoral trochanteric fracture surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 203 patients >75 years (mean age, 87.9 years) with femoral trochanteric fractures who underwent short nail fixation under orthopedically managed spinal anesthesia at our hospital between April 2020 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (intraoperative vasopressor) and group B (no vasopressor). The following data were compared: age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, antihypertensive medication, years of experience as a primary surgeon, bupivacaine dose, puncture level, anesthesia time, operation time, hemoglobin level and blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio on the day of surgery, brain natriuretic peptide level, left ventricular ejection fraction, and percentage of patients operated on the day of transport. RESULTS: There were 65 patients in group A and 138 in group B. The average dose of bupivacaine was 11.7 mg. In a univariate analysis, group A was slightly younger (87.0 vs. 88.3 years), had a higher blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio (27.1 vs. 24.5), more frequently received ß-blockers (14.1% vs. 5.8 %) and diuretic medications (21.9% vs. 11.6 %), and had a higher puncture level. A logistic regression analysis identified younger age (p = 0.02) and diuretic medication (p = 0.001) as independent risk factors in group A. Vasopressor use was more frequent at a higher puncture level in group A (57 % for L2/3, 33 % for L3/4, 15 % for L4/5, 0 % for L5/S). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension is attributed to volume deficit or extensive sympathetic blockade and may be prevented by avoiding high puncture levels and increasing preoperative fluid supplementation in patients on diuretics. There is currently no consensus on anesthetic dosages.

Nail fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures with or without cement augmentation: A cost-utility analysis in the United States: Cost-utility of cement augmentation.

OBJECTIVES: Recent clinical studies have shown favorable outcomes for cement augmentation for fixation of trochanteric fracture. We assessed the cost-utility of cement augmentation for fixation of closed unstable trochanteric fractures from the US payer's perspective. METHODS: The cost-utility model comprised a decision tree to simulate clinical events over 1 year after the index fixation surgery, and a Markov model to extrapolate clinical events over patients' lifetime, using a cohort of 1,000 patients with demographic and clinical characteristics similar to that of a published randomized controlled trial (age ≥75 years, 83 % female). Model outputs were discounted costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a lifetime. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter uncertainty on results. RESULTS: Fixation with augmentation reduced per-patient costs by $754.8 and had similar per-patient QALYs, compared to fixation without augmentation, resulting in an ICER of -$130,765/QALY. The ICER was most sensitive to the utility of revision surgery, mortality risk ratio after the second revision surgery, mortality risk ratio after successful index surgery, and mortality rate in the decision tree model. The probability that fixation with augmentation was cost-effective compared with no augmentation was 63.4 %, 58.2 %, and 56.4 %, given a maximum acceptable ceiling ratio of $50,000, $100,000, and $150,000 per QALY gained, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fixation with cement augmentation was the dominant strategy, driven mainly by reduced costs. These results may support surgeons in evidence-based clinical decision making and may be informative for policy makers regarding coverage and reimbursement.

Comparing short vs. intermediate and long nails in elderly patients with unstable multifragmental femoral trochanteric fractures (AO type A2): Multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral trochanteric fractures (FTFs), especially Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/ the Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A2 fractures, which are multifragment fractures, occur in elderly individuals with osteoporosis and are associated with high mortality and complication rates due to prolonged immobilization. Longer nails (LNs) were developed to obtain superior fracture site stabilization in unstable FTFs. We hypothesized that the postoperative outcomes of elderly patients with unstable FTFs treated with LNs would be superior to those of patients treated with short nails (SNs), with fewer complications. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of SNs versus LNs in elderly patients with unstable FTFs. From the Trauma Research Group of our university (TRON) database, 1854 trochanteric fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2020 were extracted. A total of 174 patients>65 years of age with AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures were included in the present study. They were divided into the SN group and the LN group and matched for age and sex. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, survival rate, Parker Mobility Score (PMS), and numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, complications, and radiographic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Both groups included 67 patients with an average age of 87.32 years. The LN group had a longer operative time (76.52 min vs. 51.61 min, P < 0.001) and more blood loss (106.79 mL vs. 49.98 mL, P = 0.014) in comparison to the SN group. However, the 1-year survival rate, PMS, and NRS for pain did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the groups. The rates of complications, including screw cutout, nonunion, implant breakage, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and surgical site infections, were comparable. The radiographic findings, including the nail/canal ratio, progression of varus, and sliding distance, were also similar. CONCLUSION: Although LNs are associated with longer operative times and increased blood loss, the overall outcomes and complication rates are comparable to those of SNs in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 type unstable FTFs. The use of LNs did not confer any distinct advantages for this specific type of fracture.

Cortical Thickness Index and Canal Calcar Ratio: A Comparison of Proximal Femoral Fractures and Non-Fractured Femora in Octogenarians to Centenarians.

Background: The cortical thickness index (CTI) is a measure of bone quality and it correlates with the risk of proximal femoral fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the CTI in femoral neck, trochanteric fractures and non-fractured femora in geriatric patients and to determine whether there is a correlation between the CTI and the presence of a fracture. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients (fifty femoral neck- (FNFx), fifty trochanteric fractures (TFx) and fifty non-fractured (NFx)) with a mean age of 91 (range 80-104) years were included. Hip radiographs (antero-posterior (ap), lateral) were evaluated retrospectively. Measurements on the proximal femoral inner and outer cortices, including CTI and Dorr's canal calcar ratio (CCR), were assessed for inter-observer reliability (ICC), differences of each fracture and correlation of parameters. Results: The mean ap CTI on the affected side was 0.43, 0.45 and 0.55 for FNFx, TFx and NFx, respectively. There was a significant difference of the ap CTI and CCR comparing the injured and healthy side for both fracture cohorts (p < 0.001). Patients with FNFx or TFx had significantly lower CTI on both sides compared to the NFx group (p < 0.05). There was no difference for CTI (p = 0.527) or CCR (p = 0.291) when comparing both sides in the NFx group. The mean inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.88). Conclusions: In proximal femoral fractures, the CTI and CCR are reduced compared with those in non-fractured femora. Both parameters are reliable and show a good correlation in geriatric patients. Therefore, especially for geriatric patients, the CTI and CCR may help to predict fracture risk and consult patients in daily practice.

Angle-Adjustable Dynamic Hip Screw Plate for Unstable Trochanteric Fractures in Middle-Aged Patients: Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sport.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results in the literature regarding the superiority of proximal femoral nails over dynamic hip screw (DHS) plates. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate mid-term post-injury patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and return to sport (RTS) in middle-aged patients treated with the DHS plate for unstable trochanteric fractures. METHODS: Fifty-seven middle-aged patients (35-64 years) treated for proximal femoral fractures of type 31-A2 and 31-A3 according to the AO/OTA classification with the DMS Dynamic Martin Screw (KLS Martin Group, Jacksonville, FL, USA) between January 2017 and December 2019 were enrolled. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in this retrospective study, and the average age was 54.1 years (SD 8.4). The average follow-up duration at final follow-up was 60.5 months (SD 8.6). Post-operative complications included only one case of aseptic loosening of the implant, with a complication rate of 2%. There were no infections, peri-implant fractures, or other complications reported. Two out of the forty-nine patients (4.1%) required treatment with a total hip arthroplasty due to post-traumatic arthritis. The Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 77.1 (SD 20.1), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was 21.6 (SD 13.7). The overall rate of RTS was 57.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with DHS for unstable trochanteric fractures is a safe option in middle-aged patients, ensuring a good functional recovery.

Failure after intramedullary nailing for geriatric trochanteric fracture: does quality of fracture reduction on the AP and lateral planes show the same results?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the failure of trochanteric fracture fixation according to the quality of fracture reduction on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. METHODS: Data from 340 female and 152 male patients ≥ 60 years of age who underwent intramedullary nailing for a trochanteric fracture between 2016 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The quality of fracture reduction was classified as type A, type E, and type I on the AP view and type N, type A, and type P on the lateral view according to the relative position of the proximal and distal fragments. The failure rate was evaluated and compared according to the quality of fracture reduction. The risk factors of the fixation failure were investigated by comparison of variables between patients with and without failure and by regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with poor reduction, type I and type P had higher failure rates. However, a statistically significant difference was found only for patients with poor reduction (type P) on the lateral view (p < 0.001). Patients with failure showed significantly higher rates of poor reduction on the lateral view and AO/OTA type A3 fractures. The regression analysis also showed that poor reduction on the lateral view (odds ratio [OR] 12.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-40.6; p < 0.001) and AO/OTA type A3 fractures (OR 5.40; 95% CI 1.24-23.49, p = 0.025) were risk factors for failure. CONCLUSION: Poor reduction such as type P reduction was associated with failure after intramedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures. Surgeons should check the quality of fracture reduction carefully with the proper fluoroscopic view to prevent failure in geriatric patients with trochanteric fractures.

Should recommended laboratory-test cut-offs allowing surgery be followed for proximal femoral fractures in patients on direct oral anticoagulant therapy?

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) in elderly patients must receive prompt surgical treatment. Optimal PFF-surgery timing in patients on direct oral anticoagulant (DOA) therapy is a specific but common clinical issue. Recommendations exist about the anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels and creatinine clearance values required to allow surgery. The objectives of this study in patients older than 75 years who required PFF surgery were to evaluate bleeding when the recommendations were versus were not applied and to assess concordance between DOA-activity-assay results and creatinine clearance used to help determine the wait to surgery. HYPOTHESIS: Peri-operative bleeding is more marked when surgery is performed while the DOA is still active. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective, comparative, observational study included 87 patients older than 75 years who required arthroplasty or intra-medullary nailing for PFF and were taking DOA therapy. Surgery was performed after versus before the laboratory-test results fell below the recommended cut-offs in 68 patients (Rec+ group) versus 19 patients (Rec- group), respectively. The study outcomes were blood loss estimated using the Mercuriali's formula and the proportion of patients requiring post-operative blood transfusions. RESULTS: Mean blood loss was 287.1mL in the Rec+ group and 411.7mL in the Rec- group (p=0.12). Blood transfusions were required by a post-operative haemoglobin level below 0.8g/dL in 11 (16.2%) Rec+ patients and 6 (31.6%) Rec- patients (p=0.2). Concordance was poor between DOA activity and creatinine clearance (Cohen's κ, 0.16; p=0.146). DISCUSSION: Peri-operative bleeding was not significantly more severe when PFF surgery was performed while DOA therapy was still active. These data suggest that PFF surgery within 48h may be appropriate in patients older than 75 years on DOA therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective single-centre study.

Impact of fast-track rehabilitation nursing on pressure ulcers and postoperative complications in patients with inter-trochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis.

We sought to investigate the effects of fast-track rehabilitation nursing on pressure ulcers, length of hospital stay and postoperative complications in patients with inter-trochanteric fractures (ITF). The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to September 2023 on the application of fast-track rehabilitative nursing to ITF. Two investigators independently screened the literature and performed data extraction and quality assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Overall, 22 RCTs involving 1904 patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that after fast-track rehabilitation nursing intervention in patients with ITF, the occurrence of pressure ulcers (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.47; p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.14-0.26; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced and hospital stay was significantly shorter (standardised mean difference: -3.10; 95% CI: -3.82 to -2.38; p < 0.001). Nursing care for patients with ITF based on the concept of fast-track rehabilitation is conducive to reducing the occurrence of pressure ulcers, lowering the occurrence of complications, shortening the length of hospitalisation and promoting postoperative rehabilitation.

Augmented versus non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails for treating trochanteric fractures in patients over sixty-five years of age.

PURPOSE: Intramedullary nailing is a common treatment for pertrochanteric fractures. However, implant-related mechanical failures, such as cut-out and cut-through, lead to higher rates of revision surgery, loss of autonomy, and mortality. Cemented augmentation enhances the bone-implant interface. This study compared the frequency of mechanical failures between augmented and non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails. METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective study at a level 1 trauma centre included patients aged > 65 years with pertrochanteric fractures treated by a short augmented or non-augmented TFNA nail. The primary outcome was the comparison of cut-out or cut-through rates between groups at three and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients analysed, 103 had augmented TFNA nails and 78 had non-augmented TFNA nails. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographic characteristics, AO/OTA classification, or quality of reduction. The failure rate was significantly lower in the augmented group than in the non-augmented group: 1 (0.97%) versus 9 (11.54%) (p = 0.005). At six months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning functional recovery, as measured by the Parker and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions scores. CONCLUSIONS: For patients aged over 65 years, the use of the augmented TFNA nail may reduce the risk of fixation failures such as cut-out.

Patients with trochanteric hip fractures and pre-existing osteoarthritis can be treated with nailing osteosynthesis without significant decrease in functional status.

PURPOSE: Functional outcome in patients after trochanteric fracture fixation with pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. Analyzing their function and independence, before and after fracture, could optimize their treatment and decrease the socioeconomic burden in this particular group. METHODS: The influence of pre-existing radiographic hip OA on functional outcome was retrospectively analyzed with a cohort of patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing for trochanteric fracture. OA was graded according to the Tonnis classification. Functional outcome was assessed preoperatively and 12 months after surgery by the Parker Mobility Score (PMS). We consider a meaningful reduction a difference between preoperatively PMS and 12 months after surgery ≥ 2. In order to evaluate if OA is related to PMS reduction ≥ 2, we calculate the SubHazard ratio (SHR) performing a competing risk regression model considering death as a competing risk event, adjusting by confounders. Death, reoperations, readmissions, surgical time, and fracture reduction quality in patients with and without osteoarthritis were recorded. RESULTS: 375 trochanteric hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails were included, from which 80 (21% CI95% 17%-21%) were classified as Tonnis 2 or 3. This group of patients with pre-existing OA was significantly older (mean age of 88.6 [SD 5.65] vs 85.5 years [SD 6.95]) than the group without OA. The preoperatively PMS score was 6.28 (2.71) in non-OA patients and 5.69 (2.67) in OA patients. The mean PMS reduction 12 months after surgery was 1.3 (SD 2.05) in OA patients and 1.07 (SD 2.2) in non-OA patients (p = 0.43). Competing risks analysis, adjusted by confounders had an SHR of 1.15 (IC95% 0.77 - 1.69). Death, readmission, reoperations, surgical time, and fracture reduction quality did not differ in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-existing radiographic OA treated with femoral nailing have a similar reduction in functional outcomes compared to the non-OA group at one-year follow-up. Further studies will be needed to compare the results of the functional outcome in arthroplasty with those of femoral nailing for the treatment of trochanteric femur fractures in patients with OA.

Traction images heavily influence lateral wall measurement in trochanteric hip fractures. A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: hip fracture represents a global health problem, with a high morbidity and mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The treatment of trochanteric fractures is reduction and osteosynthesis, and implant selection depends mainly on the stability of the fracture and lateral wall competence. Lateral wall competence has gained relevance in recent years, which led to the modification of the AO/OTA classification. However, determination of lateral wall integrity is difficult from plain radiographs; the influence of images with traction on its measurement has not been evaluated. METHODS: prospective concordance study, emergency and post-traction radiographs of 65 patients with trochanteric fracture were evaluated by six orthopedic surgeons independently, measuring the lateral wall, classifying the fracture according to the AO/OTA 2018 classification and selecting the implant for osteosynthesis. A comparison of incompetent to intact lateral wall proportion between each image set was made. Secondary outcomes were the inter-observer correlation of lateral wall measurement and inter-observer agreement of classification and implant choice. RESULTS: the proportion of patients with an incompetent lateral wall in emergency x-ray was 37.43% (CI 95% 0.326-0.422), while the proportion in post-traction fluoroscopy was 15% (CI 95% 0.115-0.185), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). 40.1% of patients with an incompetent lateral wall changed to an intact one. Inter-observer correlation for the lateral wall thickness was 0.399 (CI 95% 0.292-0.519) in emergency x-ray and 0.658 (CI 95% 0.564-0.748) in post-traction fluoroscopy, with a substantial agreement. Inter-observer agreement for the fracture classification was fair to moderate using emergency x-ray (κ 0.369 95%CI 0.330-0.408) and fair to moderate with post-traction fluoroscopy (κ 0.400, 95% CI 0.334-0.466). CONCLUSION: traction images significantly change the measurement of the lateral wall in trochanteric fractures, changing from an incompetent to a competent wall in 40% of patients. The correct classification of trochanteric fractures is crucial to make the best decision when deciding which implant to use, and the measurement of the lateral wall is determinant in the actual AO/OTA classification. Therefore, traction images appear as necessary for correct decision-making.

Trochanteric Claw Plate Fixation for Greater Trochanteric Fracture or Osteotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This study retrospectively evaluated 41 consecutive open reductions and internal fixations following primary or revision total hip arthroplasty, which required trochanteric claw plate fixation for greater trochanteric fracture or osteotomy between January 2008 and December 2020. The mean duration of clinical follow-up was 4.2 years (range, 1-13 years). The patients included 13 men and 28 women, with a mean age of 68 years (range, 32-87 years). The indications for intervention included trochanteric osteotomy, intraoperative fracture, and non-union including postoperative fracture in 6, 9, and 26 cases, respectively. The mean Merle d'Aubigné Clinical Score improved from 9.4 points (range, 5-15 points) pre-operatively, to 14.3 points (range, 9-18 points) at the last follow-up. Bone union occurred in 35 cases (85%), while implant breakage occurred in four cases. At the last follow-up, the mean Merle d'Aubigné Clinical Scores of bone union and non-union were 15.3 and 14.1, respectively (p=0.48). The Kaplan-Meier survival rate, with the endpoint being revision surgery for pain, non-union, dislocation, or implant breakage, at 10 years was 80.0% (95% confidence interval: 62.6-97.4%). Greater trochanteric fixation using a trochanteric claw plate yielded successful results.

Risk of peri­implant femoral fracture after cephalomedullary nailing in older patients with trochanteric fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recent increase in the use of cephalomedullary nails for trochanteric hip fractures, factors that may be associated with peri­implant femoral fracture (PIFF) after cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures remain unknown. We investigated the factors associated with PIFF after cephalomedullary nailing of trochanteric hip fractures in older patients. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using a database of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent surgery with cephalomedullary nails for trochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma during 2005-2021. The cases were defined as patients who developed PIFF after surgery, while controls were patients who did not develop PIFF and who were followed up for ≥3 years after surgery. Four controls were randomly matched to each case for sex and age. First, potential factors associated with PIFF were compared between cases and controls. Second, multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis was employed to assess factors possibly associated with PIFF, controlling for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 1531 patients who underwent surgery with cephalomedullary nails because of trochanteric fractures, we assessed 34 cases and 136 controls (N = 170; mean age 85.7 ± 7 years; and females, 94 %). PIFF was significantly associated with patients having undergone total knee arthroplasty (adjusted odds ratios [95 % confidence intervals], 4.41 [1.16-16.8]) and those with AO/OTA classification 31A3 fracture (A3 fracture) (2.3 [1.12-4.76]), after adjusting for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that PIFF was more likely to develop among older patients with a clinical history of total knee arthroplasty and A3 fracture. These findings suggest that such patients may require careful follow-up with rigorous assessments after cephalomedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures.

Influence of greater trochanteric bone density and three-dimensional morphology on perioperative greater trochanteric fracture following total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative greater trochanteric fracture following total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the anterolateral approach is a recognized perioperative complication. There was no previous study to determine the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and three-dimensional greater trochanter morphology for perioperative greater trochanter fractures. The purpose of this study is to identify the influence of greater trochanteric bone density and three-dimensional morphology on perioperative greater trochanteric fracture following THA using the anterolateral approach. METHODS: We investigated 209 hips done primary THA using the anterolateral approach and preoperative BMD test for the proximal femoral bone with a minimum of 6 months follow-up. We picked up all patients who had perioperative greater trochanteric fractures. Multivariate analysis was done in order to investigate the influence of the greater trochanter young adult mean (YAM) and three-dimensional morphology on perioperative greater trochanteric fractures. RESULTS: There were 10 joints (10/209, 4.8%) with perioperative greater trochanteric fractures. Osteosynthesis was required only in one joint (1/209, 0.5%) because the bone fragments were significantly displaced proximally by the gluteus medius. Multivariate analysis showed the combination of Type B femoral shape (in cases where the top of the great trochanter was inside the longitudinal central axis of the planned femoral stem in computed tomography (CT)- based three-dimensional templating) and a YAM of < 80% was the only risk factor for fracture. CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative greater trochanter BMD test (YAM < 80%) and three-dimensional femoral morphology (Type B femoral shape) provide useful information to mitigate the occurrence of perioperative greater trochanter fractures associated with THA using the anterolateral approach.

Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies / Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de 2 estrategias de tratamiento

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)

[Artículo traducido] Fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur: resultados de dos estrategias de tratamiento / Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures: Results of two treatment strategies

Introduction: Ipsilateral proximal and shaft femoral fractures typically occur in young adults after high-energy trauma. No consensus exists regarding the optimal internal fixation device or surgical strategy for these complex fractures. Our main objective is to identify differences on outcomes and complications between patients treated with one or combined implants. Material and method: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with associated fractures of the proximal (31 AO) and shaft femur (32 AO). We divided the patients into two groups according to the use of single (Group I) or combined implants (Group II). Demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical data and development of complications were collected.Results: We identified 28 patients (19 men and 9 women) with an average age of 43 years. We used an anterograde femoral nail in group I (17 patients) and a retrograde femoral nail or a plate associated with hip lag screws or sliding hip screw in Group II (11 patients). Patients were followed up for 26.28 (9.12–62.88) months. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, osteoarthritis, infection or nonunion was found in 9 patients (32%). No significant differences (p 0.70) were found in complications between two groups or between definitive surgical fixation before or after the first 24h. Conclusions: No differences in the development of complications or timing of definitive fixation were found between the use of one or combined implants in ipsilateral proximal femur and shaft fractures. Regardless of the implant chosen, an appropriate osteosynthesis technique is crucial, even so high complication rates are expected.

Introducción: Las fracturas ipsilaterales proximales y diafisarias del fémur suelen ocurrir en adultos jóvenes después de un traumatismo de alta energía. No existe consenso sobre el dispositivo de fijación interna óptimo o la estrategia quirúrgica para estas fracturas complejas. Nuestro principal objetivo es identificar las diferencias en los resultados y complicaciones entre los pacientes tratados con un implante o combinados. Material y método: Este es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo unicéntrico en pacientes con fracturas asociadas del fémur proximal (31 AO) y diafisarias (32 AO). Dividimos a los pacientes en 2 grupos según el uso de implantes únicos (grupo i) o combinados (grupo ii). Se recogieron datos demográficos, clínicos, radiológicos, quirúrgicos y complicaciones. Resultados: Se identificaron 28 pacientes (19 hombres y 9 mujeres) con una edad promedio de 43 años. Utilizamos un clavo femoral anterógrado en el grupo i (17 pacientes) y un clavo femoral retrógrado o una placa con tornillos a compresión o tornillo deslizante de cadera en el grupo ii (11 pacientes). Los pacientes fueron seguidos durante 26,28 (9,12-62,88) meses. Se encontró osteonecrosis de la cabeza femoral, osteoartritis, infección o seudoartrosis en 9 pacientes (32%). No se encontraron diferencias significativas (p=0,70) en las complicaciones entre los 2 grupos o entre la fijación quirúrgica definitiva antes o después de las primeras 24h. Conclusiones: No se encontraron diferencias en el desarrollo de complicaciones o el momento de la fijación definitiva entre el uso de un implante o combinado en fracturas ipsilaterales de fémur proximal y diafisario. Independientemente del implante elegido, una técnica de osteosíntesis adecuada es crucial; aun así son esperables altas tasas de complicaciones.(AU)