Predictors and optimal management of tumor necrosis factor antagonist nonresponse in inflammatory bowel disease: A literature review.

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists, the first biologics approved for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are effective for the induction and maintenance of remission and significantly improving prognosis. However, up to one-third of treated patients show primary nonresponse (PNR) to anti-TNF-α therapies, and 23%-50% of IBD patients experience loss of response (LOR) to these biologics during subsequent treatment. There is still no recognized predictor for evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF drugs. This review summarizes the existing predictors of PNR and LOR to anti-TNF in IBD patients. Most predictors remain controversial, and only previous surgical history, disease manifestations, drug concentrations, antidrug antibodies, serum albumin, some biologic markers, and some genetic markers may be potentially predictive. In addition, we also discuss the next steps of treatment for patients with PNR or LOR to TNF antagonists. Therapeutic drug monitoring plays an important role in treatment selection. Dose escalation, combination therapy, switching to a different anti-TNF drug, or switching to a biologic with a different mechanism of action can be selected based on the concentration of the drug and/or antidrug antibodies.

Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis Based on Prior Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Failure Status.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We summarize the efficacy and safety data of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily in the UC clinical program, stratified by prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failure status. METHODS: Efficacy was assessed in the pooled phase 3 OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 studies (N = 1139), the phase 3 OCTAVE Sustain maintenance study (N = 593), and the dose-escalation subpopulation of the open-label, long-term extension OCTAVE Open study (N = 59). Safety was assessed in OCTAVE Sustain, the dose-escalation subpopulation, and the Overall Cohort, which included patients from OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, OCTAVE Sustain, and OCTAVE Open (N = 1124; no prior TNFi failure N = 541; prior TNFi failure N = 583; phase 2 data were excluded when stratified by prior TNFi failure status). The dose-escalation subpopulation received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2, tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in OCTAVE Sustain, and tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in OCTAVE Open. RESULTS: Tofacitinib had greater efficacy than placebo, regardless of prior TNFi failure status. In OCTAVE Sustain and the Overall Cohort, herpes zoster [HZ] (nonserious and serious) rates were numerically higher in tofacitinib-treated patients with vs without prior TNFi failure. Dose escalation to tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily generally recaptured clinical response for most patients. HZ (nonserious and serious) rates were numerically higher in the dose-escalation subpopulation vs the Overall Cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib was efficacious in patients with UC regardless of prior TNFi failure status. HZ (nonserious and serious) rates were numerically higher in patients who had previously failed TNFi. ClinicalTrials.gov: A3921063 (NCT00787202); OCTAVE Induction 1 (NCT01465763); OCTAVE Induction 2 (NCT01458951); OCTAVE Sustain (NCT01458574); and OCTAVE Open (NCT01470612).

Treatment of refractory gout with TNF-α antagonist etanercept combined with febuxostat.

A male patient, diagnosed as acute gouty arthritis with hypertension, gastrointestinal fungal infection, gastric ulcer, and other diseases, received the following treatment: low purine diet, alkalization of urine, omeprazole to inhibit gastric acid secretion, low-dose colchicine to relieve joint pain, febuxostat to reduce uric acid synthesis, losartan potassium to reduce blood pressure, atorvastatin calcium tablet to lower lipid, cefmendoxime proxetil to resist infection, and TNF-α antagonist etanercept 25 mg subcutaneous injection two times a week (with 72 hours interval) for two weeks. As a result, the patient responded well to TNF antagonist etanercept. The joint pain was significantly relieved one day after treatment and completely relieved after five days. Two weeks later, the results of C-reaction protein (CRP) and blood routine examination returned to normal. We drawed conclusions as follows: TNF antagonists etanercept can alleviate the acute inflammatory response of gouty arthritis and ensure uric acid-lowering therapy. However, the safety and effectiveness of the drug in the treatment of acute, complex, and refractory gout still need to be confirmed by randomized, multi-center, large sample clinical controlled study. This case report only supplies a new reference scheme for the treatment of similar diseases.

Efficacy of infliximab in treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) denotes the therapeutic failure of at least two evidence-based, dose-based, and time-appropriate treatment regiments for major depressive disorder (MDD). Studies have suggested that alterations in proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in the pathophysiology of TRD, as well as a significant relationship between the number of failed treatment and the levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). OBJECTIVE: Performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the potential effect of the TNF-inhibitor Infliximab adjunct treatment in MDD, through randomized controlled trials (RCT). METHODS: A search in the electronic databases was proceeded, on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biomed Central, Web of Science, IBECS, LILACS, PsycINFO, Congress Abstracts, and Grey literature (Google Scholar and the British Library) for studies published until April 2019. A search strategy was developed using the terms: "Mood disorder" OR "Depressive Disorder" OR "Bipolar disorder" AND "Infliximab" OR "tumor necrosis factor antagonist" as text words and Medical Subject Headings (i.e., MeSH and EMTREE). The therapeutic effects of adjunctive treatment with Infliximab were analyzed. The meta-analysis was performed including the results of the Hamilton Scale for Depression (HAM-D). RESULTS: Four primary studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 152 patients. The meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant effect of Infliximab as an adjuvant treatment for TRD. LIMITATIONS: Articles in this meta-analysis originate from the same country. The main treatments used were different among the included studies. CONCLUSION: Infliximab was not efficient in reducing depressive symptoms according to the HAM-D, only when the patients already had increased inflammatory genes, including TNF and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Efficacy of Infliximab in Crohn's Disease Patients with Prior Primary-Nonresponse to Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists (TNFs) are effective for moderate-severe Crohn's disease (CD). Approximately one-third of patients have primary-nonresponse to TNFs, which is reported to predict worse response to subsequent TNF therapy. However, this is based on treatment with subcutaneously (SC) administered, fixed-dose TNFs after failure of intravenously (IV) administered, weight-based TNFs. No study has specifically assessed the clinical and endoscopic effectiveness of IV TNFs following primary-nonresponse to SC TNFs. We hypothesize that IV, weight-based TNF dosing offers advantages over SC, fixed-dose TNFs and may be effective despite primary-nonresponse to previous SC fixed-dose TNFs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients with moderate-severe CD with primary-nonresponse to one or more SC TNFs who subsequently received the IV TNF, infliximab for ≥ 12 weeks. We described baseline characteristics, and clinical, endoscopic and biochemical response to therapy. RESULTS: Key characteristics of 17 patients are described in Table 1. After ≥ 12 weeks of infliximab, 11 of 15 (73.3%) patients with clinical data reported clinical response and remission. Of 11 patients with endoscopic data, restaging colonoscopy revealed mucosal improvement in seven (63.6%) patients. Of these, five (45.5%) had endoscopic remission and three (27.3%) had mucosal healing. Table 1 Baseline characteristics of CD patients with primary-nonresponse to subcutaneous (SC) tumor necrosis antagonists (TNF), subsequently treated with intravenous (IV) TNF therapy Characteristics N 17 Mean age, years (range) 37.5 (18-67) Mean BMI, kg/m2 (range) 26.6 (17.8-40.6) Mean albumin prior to infliximab, g/dL (range) RR: 3.5-5.2 g/dL 3.57 (2.5-4.2) Female sex [n (%)] 7 (41.2) Tobacco use [n (%)]  Never 15 (88.2)  Former 1 (5.88)  Current 1 (5.88) Age at diagnosis [n (%)]  Less than 17 2 (11.8)  17-40 11 (64.7)  Over 40 4 (23.5) Mean disease duration, yrs (range) 7.76 (1-24) Disease extent [n (%)]  Ileal 2 (11.8)  Colonic 5 (29.4)  Ileocolonic 10 (64.7) Disease behavior [n (%)]  Nonstenosing, nonpenetrating 10 (58.8)  Stenosing 3 (17.6)  Penetrating 2 (11.8)  Stenosing and penetrating 2 (11.8) History of gastrointestinal surgery [n (%)] 4 (23.5)  Ileocecal resection (n) 2  Hemicolectomy (n) 2 Prior therapy [n (%)]  IV corticosteroids 3 (17.6)  Oral corticosteroids 14 (82.4)  5-ASA 12 (70.6)  Thiopurine 14 (82.4)  Methotrexate 10 (58.8) Prior biologic therapy  Adalimumab only 12 (70.6)  Certolizumab pegol only 2 (11.8)  Adalimumab and certolizumab pegol 2 (11.8)  Adalimumab, certolizumab pegol and golimumab 1 (5.88) Dose escalation of prior SC TNF [n (%)]  Adalimumab 9 (52.9)  Certolizumab pegol 0 (0.0)  Golimumab 0 (0.0) During infliximab, concomitant therapy [n (%)]  Immunomodulator 13 (76.5)  Corticosteroid 5 (29.4) CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate-severe CD with prior primary-nonresponse to SC, fixed-dose TNFs, subsequently treated with IV, weight-based TNF have high rates of clinical and endoscopic response and remission. Therefore, despite primary-nonresponse to SC TNFs, patients may benefit from IV TNF therapy and may not require a change to a different class of biologic therapy.

Is It Possible to Discontinue Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists after Psoriasis Remission?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are highly effective treatments for psoriasis. These agents provide the opportunity to improve disease activity and achieve clinical remission. Despite its efficacy, long-term use of biologics is associated with high financial costs and possibly life-threatening adverse events. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in discontinuing TNF antagonists in patients with psoriasis who have achieved a positive clinical response. However, there is a paucity of data and clinical guidelines concerning the cessation TNF antagonists in psoriasis treatment. Several factors, including cost, subsequent treatment efficacy, relative risks, and tolerability, should be considered before the decision is made to discontinue TNF antagonists. Well-designed clinical trials are necessary to identify factors that may trigger disease exacerbation after medication discontinuation in order to recognize the potential disadvantages of discontinuing treatment in patients who are previously successfully managed on TNF antagonists.

Is It Possible to Discontinue Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists after Psoriasis Remission?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are highly effective treatments for psoriasis. These agents provide the opportunity to improve disease activity and achieve clinical remission. Despite its efficacy, long-term use of biologics is associated with high financial costs and possibly life-threatening adverse events. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in discontinuing TNF antagonists in patients with psoriasis who have achieved a positive clinical response. However, there is a paucity of data and clinical guidelines concerning the cessation TNF antagonists in psoriasis treatment. Several factors, including cost, subsequent treatment efficacy, relative risks, and tolerability, should be considered before the decision is made to discontinue TNF antagonists. Well-designed clinical trials are necessary to identify factors that may trigger disease exacerbation after medication discontinuation in order to recognize the potential disadvantages of discontinuing treatment in patients who are previously successfully managed on TNF antagonists.

Drug-Induced Sarcoidosis-Like Reactions.

A drug-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction (DISR) is a systemic granulomatous reaction that is indistinguishable from sarcoidosis and occurs in a temporal relationship with initiation of an offending drug. DISRs typically improve or resolve after withdrawal of the offending drug. Four common categories of drugs that have been associated with the development of a DISR are immune checkpoint inhibitors, highly active antiretroviral therapy, interferons, and tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists. Similar to sarcoidosis, DISRs do not necessarily require treatment because they may cause no significant symptoms, quality of life impairment, or organ dysfunction. When treatment of a DISR is required, standard antisarcoidosis regimens seem to be effective. Because a DISR tends to improve or resolve when the offending drug is discontinued, this is another effective treatment for a DISR. However, the offending drug need not be discontinued if it is useful, and antigranulomatous therapy can be added. In some situations, the development of a DISR may suggest a beneficial effect of the inducing drug. Understanding the mechanisms leading to DISRs may yield important insights into the immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis.

A fatal case of tuberculous meningitis in a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a diagnostic challenge

Abstract The prognosis of tuberculous meningitis, a rare form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, depends on the stage of treatment initiation. We report a fatal case of tuberculous meningitis. The patient had received successive tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and abatacept to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis, with negative results for polymerase chain reaction and acid-fast bacilli on smear, had normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) adenosine deaminase and glucose levels. Six weeks post-admission, the CSF culture demonstrated Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The altered immunological responses caused by anti-TNF treatment made the diagnosis challenging. Clinicians should bear this in mind and, if suspected, treatment should be initiated immediately.

Infliximab Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Malignancy or Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Pediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Immunosuppressive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in pediatric patients is thought to increase the risk of malignancy and lymphoproliferative disorders, including hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). We compared unadjusted incidence rates of malignancy and HLH in pediatric patients with IBD exposed to infliximab (IFX) with patients not exposed to biologics and calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). METHODS: We collected and analyzed data from 5766 participants in a prospective study of long-term outcomes of pediatric patients with IBD (NCT00606346), from May 31, 2007 through June 30, 2016. Patients were 17 years old or younger and had Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or IBD-unclassified with 24,543.0 patient-years of follow-up. We estimated incidence rates for malignancy and HLH as events/1000 patient-years of follow-up. We calculated age-, sex-, and race-adjusted SIRs, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 15 patients who developed a malignancy and all 5 of the patients who developed HLH had been exposed to thiopurines; 10 patients with malignancy had also been exposed to a biologic agent. Unadjusted incidence rates showed no increased risk of malignancy (0.46/1000 patient-years) or HLH (0.0/1000 patient-years) in patients exposed to IFX as the only biologic vs those unexposed to biologics (malignancy: 1.12/1000 patient-years; HLH: 0.56/1000 patient-years). SIRs did not demonstrate an increased risk of malignancy among patients exposed to IFX (SIR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.46-4.32) vs patients not exposed to a biologic agent (SIR, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.59-5.56), even when patients were stratified by thiopurine exposure. CONCLUSIONS: In determination of age-, sex-, and race-adjusted SIRs using data from a large clinical study and the SEER database, we found that IFX exposure did not associate with increased risk of malignancy or HLH in pediatric patients with IBD. Thiopurine exposure is an important precedent event for the development of malignancy or HLH in pediatric patients with IBD.

Systematic review of efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy in patients with psoriasis previously treated with a different anti-TNF agent.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists have improved outcomes for patients with psoriasis, but some patients are unresponsive to treatment (primary failure) or lose an initially effective response (secondary failure). OBJECTIVE: We sought to systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of a second TNF antagonist after failure of a first TNF antagonist. METHODS: Published primary studies evaluating the efficacy of switching TNF antagonists after failure were systematically extracted. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Although response rates to a second TNF antagonist were lower than for a first, a substantial proportion of patients in every study achieved treatment success. Week-24 response rates for a second antagonist were 30% to 74% for a 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score and 20% to 70% for achieving a Physician Global Assessment score of 0/1; mean improvements in Dermatology Life Quality Index ranged from -3.5 to -13. In general, patients who experienced secondary failure achieved better responses than patients with primary failure. Adverse event incidences ranged from 20% to 71%, without unexpected adverse events; 0% to 11% of patients experienced serious adverse events. LIMITATIONS: There was no common definition of treatment failure across these studies of varied design. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients benefit from switching to a second TNF antagonist after failure of a first TNF antagonist, with improved quality of life.

Clinically relevant radiographic progression in joint destruction in RA patients with abnormal MMP-3 or high levels of CRP despite 1-year treatment with infliximab.

OBJECTIVE: Identify the independently related factors of joint destruction progression in RA patients despite of infliximab treatment. METHODS: The subjects were cases who underwent infliximab treatment for one year or longer in our department (n = 244). Patients in which modified total sharp score (mTSS), joint erosion (JE), and joint space narrowing (JSN) had advanced to the standard value (3.0) or more for one year were defined as mTSS- Clinically-Relevant-Rapid Progression (CRRP) (n = 20), JE-CRRP (n = 20), and JSN-CRRP (n = 23), and the respective related factors at baseline and week 54 were defined by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The median disease duration was 24 months and median mTSS 9.0 at baseline. The median DAS28, CRP, and yearly progression of mTSS improved from 5.8 to 2.6, 1.2 to 0.1 mg/dL, and 4.4 to 0.0 point/year, respectively. The related factor in each of mTSS-CRRP, JE-CRRP, and JSN-CRRP was high CRP levels at baseline. At week 54, the related factor of mTSS-CRRP and JSN-CRRP was high MMP-3 titer; however, the related factor of JE-CRRP was high CRP levels. CONCLUSION: High CRP levels at baseline were an independent predictive factor of joint destruction advancement during infliximab treatment. Moreover, it was believed that abnormal MMP-3 at week 54 was the index for mTSS and JSN advancement, while high CRP levels were the index for JE advancement.

Autoimmune hepatitis and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy: A single center report of 8 cases.

This article describes cases of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-induced autoimmune hepatitis and evaluates the outcome of these patients in relation to their immunosuppressive strategy. A retrospective analysis of medical records was performed in our center, in order to detect cases of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) associated with anti-TNF biologic agents. We describe and analyze eight cases of AIH following anti-TNF therapy, 7 with infliximab and 1 with adalimumab. A distinction should be made between induction of autoimmunity and clinically evident autoimmune disease. Liver biopsy is useful in detecting the role of the TNF-α antagonist in the development of AIH. The lack of relapse after discontinuing immunosuppressive therapy favors, as in this case series, an immune-mediated drug reaction as most patients with AIH have a relapse after treatment is suspended. Although AIH related to anti-TNF therapy is rare, a baseline immunological panel along with liver function tests should be performed in all patients with autoimmune disease before starting biologics.

Analysis of TNF-antagonist switch over time and associated risk factors in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Limited data from large cohorts are available on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol) switch over time. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of switching from one TNF antagonist to another and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: Data from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Cohort Study (SIBDCS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1731 patients included into the SIBDCS (956 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 775 with ulcerative colitis [UC]), 347 CD patients (36.3%) and 129 UC patients (16.6%) were treated with at least one TNF antagonist. A total of 53/347 (15.3%) CD patients (median disease duration 9 years) and 20/129 (15.5%) of UC patients (median disease duration 7 years) needed to switch to a second and/or a third TNF antagonist, respectively. Median treatment duration was longest for the first TNF antagonist used (CD 25 months; UC 14 months), followed by the second (CD 13 months; UC 4 months) and third TNF antagonist (CD 11 months; UC 15 months). Primary nonresponse, loss of response and side effects were the major reasons to stop and/or switch TNF antagonist therapy. A low body mass index, a short diagnostic delay and extraintestinal manifestations at inclusion were identified as risk factors for a switch of the first used TNF antagonist within 24 months of its use in CD patients. CONCLUSION: Switching of the TNF antagonist over time is a common issue. The median treatment duration with a specific TNF antagonist is diminishing with an increasing number of TNF antagonists being used.

Response of pediatric uveitis to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition (anti-TNF) for pediatric uveitis. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed children (age ≤ 18 yrs) with noninfectious uveitis receiving anti-TNF at 5 uveitis centers and 1 pediatric rheumatology center. Incident treatment success was defined as minimal or no uveitis activity at ≥ 2 consecutive ophthalmological examinations ≥ 28 days apart while taking no oral and ≤ 2 eyedrops/day of corticosteroids. Eligible children had active uveitis and/or were taking higher corticosteroid doses. RESULTS: Among 56 eligible children followed over 33.73 person-years, 52% had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and 75% had anterior uveitis (AU). The Kaplan-Meier estimated proportion achieving treatment success within 12 months was 75% (95% CI 62%-87%). Complete absence of inflammatory signs with discontinuation of all corticosteroids was observed in an estimated 64% by 12 months (95% CI 51%-76%). Diagnoses of JIA or AU were associated with greater likelihood of success, as was the oligoarticular subtype among JIA cases. In a multivariable model, compared to those with JIA-associated AU, those with neither or with JIA or AU alone had a 75%-80% lower rate of achieving quiescence under anti-TNF, independent of the number of immunomodulators previously or concomitantly prescribed. Uveitis reactivated within 12 months of achieving quiescence in 14% of those continuing anti-TNF (95% CI 6%-31%). The incidence of discontinuation for adverse effects was 8%/year (95% CI 1%-43%). CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-TNF was successful and sustained in a majority of children with noninfectious uveitis, and treatment-limiting toxicity was infrequent. JIA-associated AU may be especially responsive to anti-TNF.

Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: results through 2 years of the GO-FORWARD study extension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the longterm efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: We randomized 444 RA patients with inadequate response to MTX (3:3:2:2) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 100 mg + placebo (Group 2), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 3), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 4). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks. Patients could escape early (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 added MTX, Group 3 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 4 continued 100 mg) based on Week 16 swollen and tender joint counts. From Week 24, Group 1 patients received golimumab 50 mg + MTX. After the Week 52 database lock, patients in the longterm extension received golimumab 50-100 mg ± MTX. Coprimary endpoints [Week 14 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20, Week 24 Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] and Week 52 findings have been published; 2-year findings (observed data by randomized group, no imputation) are presented. RESULTS: Of 444 randomized patients, 392 continued from Week 52 (Group 1: n = 116, Group 2: n = 116, Group 3: n = 84, Group 4: n = 76). Clinical improvement was maintained through Week 104; ~75% and 72% of patients randomized to golimumab 50 mg + MTX and 100 mg + MTX achieved ACR20 response, respectively. The majority [88% (105/120)] of golimumab + MTX-treated patients with Week 24 HAQ-DI improvement ≥ 0.25 maintained improved physical function through Week 104. Group 1 patients with delayed golimumab treatment exhibited more Week 104 radiographic progression (mean change score = 1.15) than golimumab + MTX-randomized patients (0.52). Incidences of serious infections were 2.24, 4.77, 5.78/100 patient-years of followup for golimumab 50 mg + MTX, 100 mg + placebo, and 100 mg + MTX, respectively. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvement was maintained and no new safety signals were identified with 2 years of golimumab + MTX. Golimumab efficacy and safety, including serious infections, will continue to be monitored through 5 years (Clinical Trial No. NCT00264550).

Long-term outcome of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease treated with infliximab.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the long-term efficacy of infliximab for patients with fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease. We evaluated outcomes and predictors of outcomes in these patients. METHODS: The medical records of 156 patients treated with infliximab for fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease at 2 referral centers from 1999 through 2010 were reviewed through September 2011. Cumulative probabilities of fistula closure and recurrence were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of outcomes were identified by using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: When infliximab treatment began, only 17.9% of patients had a simple fistula; seton drainage was performed for 97 patients (62%). Concomitant immunosuppressants were given to 90 patients (56%). After a median follow-up period of 250 weeks, 108 patients (69%) had at least 1 fistula closure. Cumulative probabilities of first fistula closure were 40% and 65% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Factors that predicted fistula closure were ileocolonic disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.88), concomitant immunosuppressants (HR = 2.58), duration of seton drainage <34 weeks (HR = 2.31), and long duration of infliximab treatment (HR = 1.76). Of the 108 patients with fistula closure, cumulative probabilities of first fistula recurrence were 16.6% and 40.1% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Forty-four patients (28.9%) developed an abscess during follow-up. A number of infliximab infusions greater than 19 was associated with less abscess recurrence (HR = 0.33). At the maximal follow-up time, 55% of patients had fistula closure. CONCLUSIONS: About two-thirds of patients with fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease had fistula closure, and one-third had fistula recurrence after infliximab initiation. Combination therapy, duration of seton drainage less than 34 weeks, and long-term treatment with infliximab were associated with better outcomes.

Tuberculosis pleural asociada con adalimumab, en un paciente con artritis reumatoide / Pleural tuberculosis associated with adalimumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

La tuberculosis constituye, en nuestro medio, una de las enfermedades infecciosas endémicas. Con el advenimiento de las nuevas terapias para el control de la artritis reumatoide,como los inhibidores del factor denecrosis tumoral, la incidencia de casos de reactivación ha aumentado notoriamente. Se presenta el caso de una mujer de 42 años de edad, con disnea, dolor torácico, tos, derrame pleural con líquido pleural tipo exudado linfocítico, con deaminasa de adenosina (ADA) de 55 U-L e identificación de granuloma en la biopsia pleural. Se revisa laliteratura y se hacen recomendaciones.

Tuberculosis (TB) represents one of the endemic infectious diseases in our population. The incidence of reactivate TB cases has grown notoriously with the onset of new therapeutic options for controlling rheumatoid arthritis (RA), such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. The case of a 42 year old woman is highlighted. Her condition is characterized by shortness ofbreath, chest pain, cough, pleural effusion, linfocitic exudate pleural fluid, ADA 55 U-L and granuloma in pleural biopsy. A review of relevant literature and recommendations are presented.

Refractory lymphocytic enterocolitis and tumor necrosis factor antagonist therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic enterocolitis is a malabsorptive syndrome characterized by severe small-bowel villous abnormality and crypt hyperplasia and dense infiltrate of lymphocytes throughout the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: We present 2 patients with lymphocytic enterocolitis refractory to usual medical therapy who were treated with tumor necrosis factor antagonists. RESULTS: Both patients had clinical improvement in diarrheal symptoms and intestinal histologic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists such as infliximab or adalimumab may be a new treatment option for patients with severe refractory lymphocytic enterocolitis not responding to corticosteroids.

Etanercept in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

Etanercept is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis at a dose of 50 mg twice weekly for 3 months followed by a maintenance dosage of 50 mg weekly thereafter. Clinical studies have shown excellent efficacy, favorable benefit to side-effects ratio, and safe long-term usage. Extensive information on safety is available as etanercept has been used for many years for other indications such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis and is the first of the tumor necrosis factor antagonists to gain approval in psoriasis.