Post-PCI Anticoagulation with Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Insight from the STOPDAPT-3 Trial.

The current guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have discouraged the use of anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without specific indications, although the recommendation was not well supported by evidences. As a post-hoc analysis of the STOPDAPT-3 trial, the 30-day outcomes were compared between the two groups with and without post-PCI heparin administration among ACS patients without the use of mechanical support devices. The co-primary endpoints were the bleeding endpoint defined as the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 and the cardiovascular endpoint defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke. Among 4088 ACS patients, 2339 patients (57.2%) received post-PCI heparin. The proportion of patients receiving post-PCI heparin was higher in ST-elevation myocardial infarction than in the others (72.3% and 38.8%, P<0.001), and in patients with intraprocedural adverse angiographic findings than in those without (67.6% and 47.5%, P<0.001). Post-PCI heparin compared to no post-PCI heparin was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding endpoint (4.75% and 2.52%; adjusted HR 1.69 [95%CI 1.15-2.46], P=0.007) and a numerically increased risk of cardiovascular endpoint (3.16% and 1.72%; adjusted HR 1.56 [95%CI 0.98-2.46], P=0.06). Higher hourly dose or total doses of heparin were also associated with the higher incidence of both bleeding and cardiovascular events within 30 days. In conclusion, post-PCI anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin was frequently implemented in ACS patients. Post-PCI heparin use was associated with harm in terms of bleeding without a benefit in reducing cardiovascular events.

To Compare the Effectiveness of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin in Reducing Lower Limb Girth in Deep Vein Thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Treating deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using a once-daily dose of enoxaparin offers greater convenience and the possibility of home-based care for certain patients, as opposed to a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH). The study aimed to determine the most cost-effective thromboprophylaxis between low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and UFH for hospitalized patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After obtaining clearance from the institutional ethical committee, the study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College, over a period of six months. Informed consent was obtained from all 46 patients included in this study. The participants were divided into two groups: group A received LMWH and group B received UFH. RESULTS: The mean age in group A was 59.8 + 10.6 years and in group B was 54.9 + 12.3 years. There was no significant difference in the girth of the lower limb between the groups during the follow-up period (p > 0.05). In group A, there was a highly significant reduction in lower limb girth from day one to day five (p < 0.0001), day five to day 10 (p < 0.0001), and day one to day 10 (p < 0.0001). In group B, there was no significant reduction from day one to day five (p = 0.06), but there was a significant reduction from day five to day 10 (p = 0.001) and day one to day 10 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with LMWH as an anticoagulant significantly reduced the lower extremity girth and thrombus thickness in cases of DVT when compared to UFH.

The imprecision of measuring activated clotting time (ACT) from the guiding catheter during percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Finding the balance between the reduction in ischemic events and bleeding complications is crucial for the success of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The activated clotting time (ACT) is used routinely worldwide to monitor and titrate anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the procedure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the accuracy of ACT measurements from the guiding catheter compared to the arterial access sheath. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI with UFH therapy were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were drawn from the coronary guide catheter and the arterial access sheath. ACT values were determined in the same ACT machine, and potential interactions with clinical variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 331 patients with post PCI ACT measurements. The mean ACT value of the catheter samples was statistically higher than the arterial access sample [294 ± 77 s Vs. 250 ± 60 s, p < 0.001]. The mean difference between the guiding catheter and the arterial line sheath samples was 43 ± 27 s (P < 0.001). We found that in 101/331 [30 %] patients the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 250 s, while from the access sheath it was below 250 s. Notably, in 40/331 [12 %] the ACT from the guiding catheter was above 200 s, while from the access sheath it was below 200 s. CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of patient may be considered to have therapeutic ACT if measured from guide catheter during PCI, while the corresponding ACT from arterial sheath is subtherapeutic. This difference may have clinical and safety significance.

Risk Assessment of Critical Obstetric Bleeding With Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin.

BACKGROUND: Use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) during the peripartum period is considered to be a higher risk of critical obstetric bleeding compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). However, the evidence for the safety of using LMWH during the peripartum period is currently lacking. METHODS: This study retrospectively investigated a nationwide medical database to clarify the safety of using LMWH during childbirth. The Japanese Nationwide Diagnosis Procedure Combination database was retrospectively reviewed, and data from women with childbirth between 2018 and 2022 were collected. RESULTS: Among the overall 354,299 women with childbirth, 3,099 were with obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), 484 were with critical obstetric bleeding requiring massive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion ≥4,000 cc, and 38 were with maternal death. Among the overall women, each of the anticoagulants other than LMWH was associated with critical obstetrical bleeding with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) greater than 1.0, while LMWH was not associated with critical obstetrical bleeding (aOR, 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.11-2.71)). This finding did not change in subgroup analyses among those with Cesarean section. Furthermore, UFH was associated with critical bleeding among the 3,099 women with obstetrical DIC (aOR, 3.91 (2.83-5.46)), while LMWH was not (aOR, 0.26 (0.03-1.37)). CONCLUSION: The use of UFH was significantly associated with an increased critical obstetric hemorrhage requiring massive RBC transfusion or total hysterectomy. Meanwhile, the use of LMWH was not associated with increased critical obstetric bleeding. LMWH would be safer than UFH to be used for women during childbirth.

Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) may experience prolonged hospitalization, which is an indication for pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis according to certain international guidelines. The proportion of patients who deliver unexpectedly and within a period during which pharmacologic prophylaxis would be expected to impact coagulation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the proportion of patients with PPROM who would deliver within 12 hours of typical dosing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis if administered routinely for antepartum admissions >72 hours. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study from a database including patients admitted for expectant management of PPROM January 2011 to September 2020. The outcome of the study was the proportion of patients who remained undelivered 72 hours after admission and experienced an unplanned delivery potentially within 12 hours of enoxaparin administration. We evaluated patients undelivered after 72 hours due to international recommendations to initiate VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients after 72 hours. Unplanned delivery was defined as onset of spontaneous labor or other indication for immediate delivery. Timing of delivery was analyzed based on usual timing of enoxaparin administration daily at approximately 8 am and the recommendation to withhold regional anesthesia until 12 hours after a prophylactic dose. RESULTS: 1381 deliveries were identified as PPROM out of the 49,322 deliveries in our database. 139 cases were included after the following exclusions: delivery >35 weeks (N=641), rupture of membranes >34 weeks (N=145), delivery <72 hours after admission (N=409), insufficient data (N=35), and duplicates (N=12). Sixty of the 139 (43%) had an unplanned delivery, while 33 of these (24% of total) occurred within 12 hours of enoxaparin administration. CONCLUSION: A quarter of patients admitted for PPROM had an unplanned delivery within 12 hours of typical enoxaparin dosing. This cohort may experience harm (ineligibility for regional anesthesia, risks of general anesthesia, increased risk of bleeding) if given routine pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Risk/benefit considerations should be discussed with patients in considering pharmacologic versus mechanical prophylaxis during prolonged hospitalization for PPROM.

Anticoagulation Management Post Pulmonary Embolism.

Pulmonary embolus (PE) carries a significant impending morbidity and mortality, especially in intermediate and high-risk patients, and the choice of initial anticoagulation that allows for therapeutic adjustment or manipulation is important. The preferred choice of anticoagulation management includes direct oral anticoagulants. Vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparin are preferred in special populations or selected patients such as breastfeeding mothers, those with end-stage renal disease, or obese patients, among others. This article reviews the primary and longer-term considerations for anticoagulation management in patients with PE and highlights special patient populations and risk factor considerations.

Postoperative anticoagulation management using subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for a patient with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis: a case report.

Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) presents nonbacterial vegetation on cardiac valves. NBTE requires appropriate anticoagulant therapy to prevent recurrence after surgery. However, there has not yet been established evidence for anticoagulant therapy in NBTE, and low molecular weight heparin is not approved in Japan. We present a case of NBTE that was successfully managed with anticoagulant therapy using subcutaneous unfractionated heparin. A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with NBTE on the mitral and tricuspid valve associated with breast cancer, underwent valve replacement. Warfarin and continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin were started. However, disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred after heparin was discontinued. Continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin injection was resumed immediately, and subcutaneous unfractionated heparin was administered before discharge. Postoperative echocardiography revealed no vegetation on the prosthetic valves thereafter. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin therapy is useful to prevent the recurrence of NBTE as the anticoagulation in outpatients.

Periprocedural Bridging Therapy in Patients With Mechanical Heart Valves.

Mechanical heart valves (MHVs) are thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin. Periprocedural bridging with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients. Currently, there are no definitive class I recommendations for anticoagulation management in patients with MHVs. In this report, we present the case of a 77-year-old female who was perioperatively bridged with enoxaparin and subsequently developed an acute thrombus.

Perioperative management of venous recanalization in a patient with inherited antithrombin deficiency: case report.

Background: Inherited antithrombin (AT) deficiency (ATD) is a severe thrombophilia causing venous thromboembolism, which can be complicated by postthrombotic syndrome (PTS). Venous recanalization, used to treat PTS, often requires a temporary withdrawal of anticoagulant therapy. In ATD patients, there is a risk of insufficient perioperative anticoagulation due to altered heparin response. Key Clinical Question: There is no consensus on how to manage perioperative anticoagulation in ATD patients. Clinical Approach: Warfarin-unfractionated heparin transition could be a more reliable strategy than low-molecular-weight heparin transition because unfractionated heparin anti-Xa activity not only reflects heparin-bound AT but also AT's activity, which correlates strongly with therapeutic anticoagulation. Biological monitoring could thus decrease the number of plasma-derived AT supplementation. Conclusion: This study describes a successful perioperative management of anticoagulation for venous recanalization that could be suggested to type 1 ATD patients with PTS.

Type II Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Manifesting As Cardiac Arrest Following Intravenous Heparin Bolus During an Elective Procedure: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare and life-threatening autoimmune-mediated adverse drug reaction seen in patients who are exposed to various forms of pharmacological heparin, including unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Despite the presence of thrombocytopenia, these patients face the risk of clot formation and bleeding simultaneously. Prompt cessation of heparin and the initiation of non-heparin anticoagulants are important for the patient's survival. Typically, clinical diagnosis of HIT is necessary, and waiting for lab test results, which can take days, may not be always feasible. Here, we present a case of an unusual presentation of type II HIT, complicated by significant thrombocytopenia, pulmonary hemorrhage, and cardiac arrest after receiving intravenous (IV) heparin bolus during an elective cardiac ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in ST and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-Outcomes at two years.

BACKGROUND: The registry-based randomized VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial (NCT02311231) compared bivalirudin vs. heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for myocardial infarction (MI). It showed no difference in the composite primary endpoint of death, MI, or major bleeding at 180 days. Here, we report outcomes at two years. METHODS: Analysis of primary and secondary endpoints at two years of follow-up was prespecified in the study protocol. We report the study results for the extended follow-up time here. RESULTS: In total, 6006 patients were enrolled, 3005 with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and 3001 with Non-STEMI (NSTEMI), representing 70 % of all eligible patients with these diagnoses during the study. The primary endpoint occurred in 14.0 % (421 of 3004) in the bivalirudin group compared with 14.3 % (429 of 3002) in the heparin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.11; P = 0.70) at one year and in 16.7 % (503 of 3004) compared with 17.1 % (514 of 3002), (HR 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.96-1.10; P = 0.66) at two years. The results were consistent in patients with STEMI and NSTEMI and across major subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Until the two-year follow-up, there were no differences in endpoints between patients with MI undergoing PCI and allocated to bivalirudin compared with those allocated to heparin. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02311231.

Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolisms in Stroke Patients.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common but preventable complication observed in critically ill patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the most common type of VTE, with clinical significance based on location and symptoms. There is an increased incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) in ischemic stroke patients using unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prophylaxis compared with those using enoxaparin. However, UFH is still used in some patients due to its perceived safety, despite conflicting literature suggesting that enoxaparin may have a protective effect. The current study aimed to determine the incidence of VTEs in patients with acute ischemic strokes on UFH versus enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis, subclassifying the VTEs depending on their location and symptoms. It also aimed to examine the safety profile of both drugs. A total of 909 patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke were identified, and 634 patients were enrolled in the study-170 in the enoxaparin group and 464 in the UFH group-after applying the exclusion criteria. Nineteen patients in the UFH group (4.1%) and 3 patients in the enoxaparin group (1.8%) had a VTE. The incidence of DVT in the UFH group was 12 (2.6%), all of which were symptomatic, compared with 3 (1.8%) in the enoxaparin group, wherein one case was symptomatic. Nine patients (1.9%) in the UFH group developed a PE during the study period, and all of them were symptomatic. No patients in the enoxaparin group developed PE. No statistically significant difference was found between both groups. However, 18 patients in the UFH group (3.9%) experienced intracranial hemorrhage compared with none in the enoxaparin group, and this difference was statistically significant. Enoxaparin was found to be as effective as and potentially safer than UFH when used for VTE prophylaxis in stroke patients.

Management of prosthetic valve thrombosis with unfractionated heparin.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a severe and life-threatening complication. Surgery and thrombolytic therapy (TT) carry a high risk, and in several circumstances, optimal anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusion may be an alternative treatment. This study aimed to assess the results of UFH in patients diagnosed with both obstructive and non-obstructive PVT. METHODS: This observational retrospective study enrolled patients who had contraindications for TT and surgery underwent UFH therapy. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were enrolled [male: 55 (40.4%), mean age: 50.3 ± 14.6 years] in the study. In the successful group, 66 patients (48,5%) showed >75% regression in the thrombus burden without facing death or major non-fatal complications.In the unsuccessful group, 56 had less than a 50% reduction in thrombus load and 14 (10.3%) suffered major complications. The presence of obstruction (27.1% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.028), thrombus area 1.1 cm2 vs. 0.8 cm2; p = 0.005] and the duration of UFH treatment (15.1 vs. 11.8 (days); p = 0.005) were significantly higher in the unsuccessful UFH group.In multivariate regression analyses the presence of obstruction (RR: 3.088, p = 0.020), increased thrombus area (RR: 2.400; p = 0.015), and increased duration of UFH therapy (RR: 1.073 95%, p = 0.012) were identified as independent predictive parameters for a failed UFH therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that UFH therapy may be considered a relatively beneficial treatment strategy for some patients with PVT. The most significant factors affecting success are the obstructive nature and area of the thrombus.

Unfractionated Heparin Safety in COVID-19: Incidence and Risks of Bleeding Complications in Japan.

AIM: Several studies have shown the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but that of unfractionated heparin (UFH) has not been investigated. We investigated the prevalence of bleeding complications during UFH administration, its impact on mortality, and the risk factors of bleeding outcomes associated with UFH. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single-center tertiary care hospital, including hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The primary outcomes were measured as the prevalence of bleeding complications during hospitalization, and the secondary outcomes were thromboembolic events and 60-day mortality rates. Logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching were used to assess risk factors for bleeding complications and their impact on mortality. RESULTS: Among 1035 included patients, 516 patients were treated with UFH. Twelve (2.3%) patients in the UFH group experienced major bleeding. The prevalence of major bleeding in patients treated with therapeutic-dose UFH was 9.2%. Logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-15.0; P＜.05) and COVID-19 severity (aOR, 35.9; 95% CI, 4.57-282; P ＜.05) were associated with major bleeding complications. After propensity score matching, 11 major and 11 non-major bleeding cases (including minor bleeding) were matched. The 60-day cumulative mortality rate between the two groups did not differ significantly (P=.13, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of major bleeding in COVID-19 patients using therapeutic-dose UFH was relatively high. Critical COVID-19 and older age were risk factors for bleeding complications.

Pilot study examining anti-factor Xa levels for heparin monitoring and outcomes in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis.

Objective: There are no studies to date that examine the association between anti-factor-Xa (AFXa)-based heparin monitoring and clinical outcomes in the setting of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Methods: This pilot study included adults aged ≥18 admitted with CVT between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2021, who were treated with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and were monitored via AFXa-based nomogram within 24 h of arrival. Comparisons were made between patients with AFXa levels within the target therapeutic range (0.25-0.5 IU/mL) and patients whose levels were not within the therapeutic range within 24 h of arrival; the time (hours) from arrival to reach the therapeutic range was also examined. Outcomes were length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, major (actionable) bleeding events, and discharge home (vs. higher acuity location). Continuous data are reported in the form of the median (interquartile range). Results: Among 45 patients, treatment with UFH was initiated 2 (1-11) h after arrival, and the majority (84%) of UFH infusions did not need dose adjustment. AFXa assays were conducted every 6 (5.5-7) h. Thirty patients (67%) fell within the therapeutic range. Outcomes were similar for patients with levels within the therapeutic range vs. not: major bleeding events, 10% vs. 0% (p = 0.54); discharge home, 77% vs. 80% (p = 1.0); LOS, 5 days in each group (p = 0.95). There was also no association between outcomes and time to reach the therapeutic range. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the practicability of monitoring UFH based on AFXa values in this population of patients with CVT, but reaching target AFXa levels within 24 h of arrival may not necessarily be prognostic.

Comparison of Blood Concentration and Weight-Based Heparin and Protamine Dosing Strategies for Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND:  The conventional method of heparin and protamine management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is based on total body weight which fails to account for the heterogeneous response to heparin in each patient. On the other hand, the literature is inconclusive on whether individualized anticoagulation management based on real-time blood heparin concentration improves post-CBP outcomes. METHODS:  We searched databases of Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHL), and Google Scholar, recruiting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies comparing the outcomes of dosing heparin and/or protamine based on measured heparin concentration versus patient's total body weight for CPB. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted to compare the outcome profiles. Primary endpoints include postoperative blood loss and the correlation with heparin and protamine doses, the reversal protamine and loading heparin dose ratio; secondary endpoints included postoperative platelet counts, antithrombin III, fibrinogen levels, activated prothrombin time (aPTT), incidences of heparin rebound, and re-exploration of chest wound for bleeding. RESULTS:  Twenty-six studies, including 22 RCTs and four prospective cohort studies involving 3,810 patients, were included. Compared to body weight-based dosing, patients of individualized, heparin concentration-based group had significantly lower postoperative blood loss (mean difference (MD)=49.51 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.33-93.71), lower protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio (MD=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.32 ~ -0.12), and higher early postoperative platelet counts (MD=8.83, 95% CI: 2.07-15.59). The total heparin doses and protamine reversal were identified as predictors of postoperative blood loss by meta-regression. CONCLUSIONS:  There was a significant correlation between the doses of heparin and protamine with postoperative blood loss; therefore, précised dosing of both could be critical for reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements. Data from the enrolled studies indicated that compared to conventional weight-based dosing, individualized, blood concentration-based heparin and protamine dosing may have outcome benefits reducing postoperative blood loss. The dosing calculation of heparin based on the assumption of a one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model and linear relationship between the calculated dose and blood heparin concentration may be inaccurate. With the recent advancement of the technologies of machine learning, individualized, precision management of anticoagulation for CPB may be possible in the near future.

Contributing factors to heparin resistance during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Since the risk factors for heparin resistance (HR) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have not been fully clarified, this study investigated the contributing factors for HR after the initial unfractionated heparin (UFH) dose of 500 IU/kg. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 371 patients who underwent CPB surgery, with the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg, between May 2017 and December 2021. We defined HR as the failure to achieve activated clotting time (ACT) of > 480 s after the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg. HR was observed in 36 patients (9.7%) (HR group), while HR was not observed in 335 patients (control group). The HR group included significantly more patients with preoperative use of UFH, with significantly higher white blood cell counts, fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation products, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein, and lower hemoglobin and albumin. The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified albumin (OR: 3.09, 95% CI 1.3504-7.0845, p = 0.0075) and fibrinogen (OR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.9869-0.9963, p = 0.0003) as independent predictors for HR. Using the Youden index, the cutoffs of albumin and fibrinogen were calculated as 3.8 g/dL and 303 mg/dL, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed the predictive performance of albumin (area under the curve (AUC): 0.78, sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 81%) and fibrinogen (AUC: 0.77, sensitivity: 56%, specificity: 88%). The incidence of HR after the initial UFH dose of 500 IU/kg was 9.7%. The preoperative albumin < 3.8 g/dL and fibrinogen > 303 mg/dL were independent predictors for HR.

Is a minimum duration of 5 days of unfractionated heparin infusion necessary before transition to oral anticoagulation in cerebral venous thrombosis? a retrospective chart review.

In managing cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVT), the standard approach has been administering parenteral anticoagulation for at least five days, despite limited supporting evidence. This study aimed to determine the optimal duration of parenteral anticoagulation for CVT patients and its potential impact on their functional outcomes upon discharge. This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted across multiple healthcare centers and included adult CVT patients who received varying durations of parenteral anticoagulation: less than 5 days (n = 25) or 5 days or more (n = 16). The primary focus was on the duration of acute anticoagulation treatment, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay length and functional outcomes. The study found that a shorter duration of anticoagulation treatment (< 5 days) was linked to more favorable outcomes, as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (68% vs. 25%, RR = 0.37, CI 0.15-0.90, p = 0.007). However, regression analysis showed non statistically significant associations for all variables except gender. Female patients were significantly more likely to receive a shorter duration of anticoagulation (Odds Ratio: 2.6, 95% CI: 2.2-3.1, P-Value: <0.001). These findings suggest a potential connection between shorter anticoagulation duration (< 5 days) and improved CVT patient outcomes, as indicated by their mRS scores at discharge. The observed relationship between female gender and shorter anticoagulation duration warrants further exploration. Nevertheless, caution is necessary when interpreting these findings due to the small sample size and specific patient characteristics. Further research in a larger and more diverse cohort is essential to validate these results and understand their implications fully.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy for different regimens of pharmaco-prophylaxis among severely burned patients: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in critically ill patients, including severe burn cases. Burn patients respond differently to medications due to pharmacokinetic changes. This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of different VTE pharmaco-prophylaxis in patients admitted to the ICU with severe burns. METHODS: A pilot, open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on ICU patients with severe burns (BSA ≥ 20%). By using block randomization, patients were allocated to receive high-dose enoxaparin 30 mg q12hours (E30q12), standard-dose enoxaparin 40 mg q24hours (E40q24), or unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 Units q8hours. In this study, the primary outcomes assessed were the recruitment and consent rates, as well as bleeding or hematoma at both the donor and graft site. Additionally, secondary measures were evaluated to provide further insights. RESULTS: Twenty adult patients out of 114 screened were enrolled and received E30q12 (40%), E40q24 (30%), and UFH (30%). The recruitment rate was one patient per month with a 100% consent rate. Donor site bleeding occurred in one patient (16.7%) in the UFH group. On the other hand, graft site bleeding was only reported in one patient (12.5%) who received E30q12. Major bleeding happened in two patients, one in E30q12 and one in the UFH group. Five patients (25.0%) had minor bleeding; two patients (25.0%) received E30q12, two patients E40q24, and one patient UFH. RBC transfusion was needed in four patients, two on E30q12 and two on UFH. Only one patient had VTE, while four patients died in the hospital. CONCLUSION: The study observed a low recruitment rate but a high consent rate. Furthermore, there were no major safety concerns identified with any of the three pharmacologic prophylaxis regimens that were evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05237726.

The Impact of Intra-Operative Heparin on Thromboembolism and Death in a Matched Cohort of Patients with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Objective: Portuguese nationwide estimates indicate that 20% of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are treated when ruptured. In these cases, intra-operative unfractionated heparin (UFH) usage rates vary widely. Evidence on this topic is scarce and focused on patients treated by open repair (OSR). The aim was to determine the influence of UFH on peri-operative thromboembolic events (TEs) and death in a cohort of ruptured AAA (rAAA). Methods: Retrospective, single-centre, comparative study. From 2011 to April 2023, all consecutive rAAAs (endovascular repair [EVAR] and OSR) were considered. Primary outcomes were 30-day TE free survival and TE rates. The secondary outcome was 30-day death. Safety endpoints were procedural blood loss, blood product requirements, and secondary interventions due to haemorrhage. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each UFH patient was matched with one no UFH patient in a 1:1 ratio. Results: The study included 250 patients. After PSM, 190 patients were analysed (EVAR: 60.0% no-UFH vs. 64.4% UFH). TE free survival estimates favoured the UFH group (67.3% vs. 47.2%, p = .009; UFH adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.17). TEs were more frequent in the no UFH group (20.0% vs. 44.2% patients, p < .001; UFH aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.65 for any TE), driven by an increase in bowel ischaemia (17.9% no UFH vs. 3.2% UFH, p = .001). Most events occurred in the first 72 hours. EVAR was associated with reduced TE and improved TE free survival (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.45 and aOR 5.54, 95% CI 2.34-13.08, respectively). No significant differences in 30-day survival were noted (75% no-UFH vs. 83% UFH, p = .26; aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.48-2.43) nor in blood loss, peri-operative red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma requirements, or secondary interventions due to haemorrhage (p = .10; p = .11; p = .13 and p = .18 respectively). Conclusion: In this cohort, intra-operative UFH was safe and associated with improved TE free survival, driven by a reduction in bowel ischaemia. Conversely, mortality remained unaffected. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.