Impacto del uso de la vaina de acceso ureteral durante la ureteroscopia flexible: estudio comparativo de eficacia y seguridad / Impact of ureteric access sheath use during flexible ureteroscopy: A comparative study on efficacy and safety

Objetivos Este estudio evalúa el impacto del uso de una vaina de acceso ureteral (VAU) durante la ureteroscopia flexible (URSf) para el tratamiento de la litiasis urinaria, centrándose en resultados como la tasa libre de litiasis, el tiempo quirúrgico y las complicaciones. Métodos Este estudio prospectivo y aleatorizado se llevó a cabo en el Hospital de Badr en la Universidad de Helwan y en los hospitales de la Universidad de Ain Shams, desde agosto de 2021 hasta agosto de 2022. Los pacientes se aleatorizaron sistemáticamente a 2 grupos (URSf con VAU: 33 pacientes y URSf sin VAU: 31 pacientes), y se sometieron a evaluaciones preoperatorias y postoperatorias, incluyendo pruebas de laboratorio y de imagen. Se controlaron los posibles riesgos asociados al procedimiento, como el fracaso en el acceso al cálculo, el dolor, el sangrado y la sepsis. Resultados Se observó que los 2 grupos eran comparables en cuanto a características demográficas o hallazgos preoperatorios de la litiasis (p>0,05 para todos). Sin embargo, el tiempo quirúrgico fue menor en el grupo tratado sin VAU (79,4±15,3 vs. 90,4±16,7min en el grupo tratado con VAU; p=0,008). Las tasas de complicaciones intraoperatorias, incluidos el fracaso del acceso, la interrupción de la operación, las lesiones ureterales y el sangrado, fueron comparables en ambos grupos (p>0,05). No se observaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la tasa libre de litiasis postoperatoria (78,8 vs. 71,0%; p=0,305) y el tamaño litiásico residual medio (2,7±3,5 vs. 3,1±3,1mm; p=0,687). Conclusiones El presente estudio sugiere que URSf sin VAU puede ofrecer una opción eficiente e igualmente efectiva para el tratamiento de los cálculos renales y de uréter superior. Sin embargo, se necesitan más estudios con muestras de mayor tamaño y periodos de seguimiento más largos para validar estos resultados y establecer indicaciones más precisas para este procedimiento. (AU)

Objectives This study evaluates the impact of using an access sheath (AS) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for urolithiasis treatment, focusing on outcomes such as stone-free rate, operation time, and complications. Methods This prospective, randomized study was carried out at Badr Hospital, Helwan University, and Ain Shams University hospitals from August 2021 to August 2022. Patients were systematically randomized into two groups (fURS with AS: 33 patients and without AS: 31 patients) and underwent preoperative and postoperative assessments, including lab tests and imaging. Possible procedure-associated risks, such as failed stone access, pain, bleeding, and sepsis, were monitored. Results The two groups were found to be comparable in terms of demographic characteristics or preoperative stone findings (P>.05 for all). However, operation duration was shorter in the No Sheath group (79.4±15.3minutes vs. 90.4±16.7minutes in the Sheath group, P=.008). Intraoperative complication rates, including failed access, operation termination, ureteric injury, and bleeding, were comparable in both groups (P>.05). Postoperative stone-free rates (78.8% vs. 71.0%, P=.305) and mean residual stone size (2.7±3.5mm vs. 3.1±3.1mm, P=.687) showed no significant differences. Conclusions The present study suggests that fURS without an access sheath may offer an efficient and equally effective option for managing upper ureteric and renal stones. However, more studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to validate these findings and to establish more precise indications for this approach. (AU)

Impact of ureteric access sheath use during flexible ureteroscopy: A comparative study on efficacy and safety.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of using an access sheath (AS) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for urolithiasis treatment, focusing on outcomes such as stone-free rate, operation time, and complications. METHODS: This prospective, randomized study was carried out at Badr Hospital, Helwan University, and Ain Shams University hospitals from August 2021 to August 2022. Patients were systematically randomized into two groups (fURS with AS: 33 patients and without AS: 31 patients) and underwent preoperative and postoperative assessments, including lab tests and imaging. Possible procedure-associated risks, such as failed stone access, pain, bleeding, and sepsis, were monitored. RESULTS: The two groups were found to be comparable in terms of demographic characteristics or preoperative stone findings (p > 0.05 for all). However, operation duration was shorter in the No Sheath group (79.4 ±â€¯15.3 min vs. 90.4 ±â€¯16.7 min in the Sheath group, p = 0.008). Intraoperative complication rates, including failed access, operation termination, ureteric injury, and bleeding, were comparable in both groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative stone-free rates (78.8% vs. 71.0%, p = 0.305) and mean residual stone size (2.7 ±â€¯3.5 mm vs. 3.1 ±â€¯3.1 mm, p = 0.687) showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that fURS without an access sheath may offer an efficient and equally effective option for managing upper ureteric and renal stones. However, more studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to validate these findings and to establish more precise indications for this approach.

Initial results of endourological treatment of renoureteral lithiasis by means of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous surgery in an outpatient procedure in a tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent disease with a high socioeconomic impact, where endourological surgery has shown excellent results with minimal complications. For its part, outpatient surgery is an efficient, safe and quality care model. We present our experience in the outpatient endourological treatment of lithiasis and a review of the main series. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of 85 flexible or percutaneous procedures for the treatment of lithiasis, carried out in our center between January 2021 and April 2022. The main objective was to analyze the rate of unplanned admission and the success and incidence of complications as secondary objectives. The patients were selected following the inclusion criteria of the care process. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 ± 14 years. Urine culture was positive in 13.9% of the patients, 38% had a pre-surgical double-J catheter. Median stone surface was 55 mm 2 (961 ± 323 Hounsfield Units). 73 flexible and 12 percutaneous procedures were performed. 8 patients required immediate unplanned admission and another 2 during the first month. 94% were stone-free at the third month. No intraoperative complications were detected, although 16.5% of the patients presented some type of postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: In our experience, with a strict selection of patients and following a care process with multidisciplinary participation, endourological procedures are feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Periodic monitoring of the results is essential for the sake of a constant improvement of the process.

Resultados iniciales del tratamiento endourológico de la litiasis renoureteral mediante ureteroscopia flexible y cirugía percutánea en régimen de cirugía mayor ambulatoria en un centro de tercer nivel / Initial results of endourological treatment of renoureteral lithiasis by means of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous surgery in an outpatient procedure in a tertiary care center

Objetivo La litiasis urinaria es una enfermedad prevalente y con elevado impacto socioeconómico, donde la cirugía endourológica ha demostrado excelentes resultados con mínimas complicaciones. Por su parte, la cirugía ambulatoria es un modelo asistencial eficiente, seguro y de calidad. Presentamos nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento endourológico ambulatorio de la litiasis renoureteral y una revisión de las principales series. Material y métodos Análisis prospectivo de 85 procedimientos flexibles o percutáneos para el tratamiento de la litiasis, llevados a cabo en nuestro centro entre enero de 2021 y abril de 2022. Se estableció como objetivo principal analizar la tasa de ingreso no planificado y como objetivos secundarios el éxito e incidencia de complicaciones. Los pacientes fueron seleccionados siguiendo los criterios del proceso asistencial. Resultados La edad media fue de 56±14 años. El urocultivo fue positivo en 13,9% de los pacientes, siendo portadores de doble J prequirúrgico 38%. Mediana de superficie litiásica de 55 mm2, con 961±323 Unidades Hounsfield. Se realizaron 73 procedimientos flexibles y 12 percutáneos. Ocho pacientes requirieron ingreso no planificado inmediato y otros dos durante el primer mes. Al tercer mes, 94% se encontraban libre de litiasis. No se detectaron complicaciones intraoperatorias, aunque 16,5% de los pacientes presentaron algún tipo de complicación postoperatoria. Conclusión En nuestra experiencia, con una estricta selección de los pacientes y siguiendo un proceso asistencial con participación multidisciplinar, los procedimientos endourológicos son factibles y seguros en el ámbito ambulatorio. La monitorización periódica de los resultados es fundamental en aras de una mejora constante del proceso (AU)

Objective Urinary lithiasis is a prevalent disease with a high socioeconomic impact, where endourological surgery has shown excellent results with minimal complications. For its part, outpatient surgery is an efficient, safe and quality care model. We present our experience in the outpatient endourological treatment of lithiasis and a review of the main series. Material and methods Prospective analysis of 85 flexible or percutaneous procedures for the treatment of lithiasis, carried out in our center between January 2021 and April 2022. The main objective was to analyze the rate of unplanned admission and the success and incidence of complications as secondary objectives. The patients were selected following the inclusion criteria of the care process. Results The mean age was 56±14 years. Urine culture was positive in 13.9% of the patients, 38% had a pre-surgical double-J catheter. Median stone surface was 55 mm2 (961±323 Hounsfield Units). 73 flexible and 12 percutaneous procedures were performed. 8 patients required immediate unplanned admission and another 2 during the first month. 94% were stone-free at the third month. No intraoperative complications were detected, although 16.5% of the patients presented some type of postoperative complication. Conclusion In our experience, with a strict selection of patients and following a care process with multidisciplinary participation, endourological procedures are feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Periodic monitoring of the results is essential for the sake of a constant improvement of the process (AU)

Flexible Ureteroscopy as a Major Ambulatory Surgery Procedure. Single Center Experience and Analysis of Variables Related to Hospital Readmission

Objective: To assess our experience in flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) in major ambulatory surgery (MAS) and to detect variables related to unplanned medical assistance after surgery. Material & Methods: We conducted a retrospective study among patients with renal stones undergoing a fURS from 2014 to 2019 in MAS at our hospital. Variables: Age, gender, ASA physical status, type of anesthetic technique performed, stone characteristics, influence of double J stent before or after surgery, and postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo modified classification. We evaluated variables related to hospital readmission or visit to the emergency room after surgery. Results: A total of 222 consecutive fURS for stone disease were performed in MAS. Patients’ average age was 52.9 ± 13.91 years old. The mean operating time was 57.86 ± 21.11 minutes. The mean stone size was 1.92 ± 1.43 with a diameter of 10.01 ± 4.24 mm. 47.3% of patients had a double J stent before fURS, and in 35.14% of cases, a stent was placed after surgery. 7.65% of patients required unplanned hospitalization. 14.86% of patients presented to the emergency room in the following month after surgery. Among them, one-third consulted for symptoms related to the double J. Patients who carried a double J stent before the fURS had 64% less risk of visiting the emergency department in the following month after surgery [OR = 0,363; IC95% (0.153-0.798)]. All other variables (age, gender, operating time...) did not modify the risk of unplanned medical assistance. Conclusion: The low complication rate following flexible ureteroscopy allows its performance as an ambulatory surgery. Patients who carry double J stent before the procedure have less risk of requiring unplanned medical assistance after the surgery (AU)

Objetivos: Evaluar nuestra experiencia con laureterorrenoscopia flexible (Uflex) en régimen de cirugíamayor ambulatoria (CMA) e identificar variables predictoras de asistencia médica no programada en el postoperatorio.Material y Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes afectos de litiasis renal intervenidos mediante Uflexen régimen de CMA entre 2014 y 2019 en nuestro centro.Variables: Edad, género, medicación antitrombótica, categoría del paciente según la clasificación de la SociedadAmericana de Anestesistas (ASA), tipo de anestesia empleada, características de la litiasis, influencia del cateterismo doble J y pre y postcirugía y complicaciones postoperatorias según la clasificación Clavien-Dindo modificada.Investigamos que variables puedan asociarse a requerir ingreso o consulta a urgencias tras la intervención quirúrgica.Resultados: Un total de 222 pacientes consecutivosafectos de litiasis renal fueron intervenidos mediante Uflexen régimen de CMA. La edad de los pacientes fue de 52,9 ±13,91 años. El tiempo quirúrgico fue de 57,86 ± 21,11 minutos. El número de litiasis fue de 1,92 ± 1,43 y el tamañode la litiasis fue de 10,01 ± 4,24 mm. El 47,3% de los pacientes tenían un catéter doble J previo a la Uflex y se dejóposteriormente a la misma en un 35,14% de los casos. Un7,65% de los pacientes requirieron ingreso hospitalario. El14,86% de los pacientes acudió a urgencias en el mes siguiente a la cirugía. De ellos, un tercio consultó por sintomatología relacionada con el doble J. Los portadores de dobleJ previo a la cirugía tuvieron un 64% menos de probabilidadde consultar en urgencias en el mes siguiente [OR = 0,363;IC95% (0.153-0.798)]. El resto de variables (edad, sexo,tiempo quirúrgico…) no modificaron el riesgo de consultaen urgencias ó de ingreso hospitalario... (AU)

Modelo impreso en 3D para entrenamiento en ureteroscopia flexible, una opción de bajo coste para el entrenamiento quirúrgico / 3D printed model for flexible ureteroscopy training, a low-cost option for surgical training

Introducción La práctica en modelos experimentales es una opción válida que mejora los resultados y acorta las curvas de aprendizaje de las técnicas quirúrgicas.Nuestro objetivo fue desarrollar un modelo en plástico, impreso en 3D para la docencia, el entrenamiento y la formación en ureteroscopia flexible, analizando costes e idoneidad para la práctica de esta técnica quirúrgica.Métodos Se elaboró un modelo impreso en 3D a partir de una tomografía axial computarizada de una vía urinaria superior de un paciente real. La segmentación se llevó a cabo mediante el software HorosTM y la impresión mediante una impresora FDM-Ultimaker.Se numeró los cálices renales para ser identificados, como en el plan de formación de tratamiento endoscópico de litiasis, ejercicio 4, de la Asociación Europea de Urología.Se utilizaron: un ureteroscopio flexible desechable Innovex (Palex) y cestillas de nitinol (Coloplast).Resultados El tiempo de impresión fue de 19h, con un coste total de 8,77€.El modelo tridimensional permitió la introducción del ureteroscopio flexible y la exploración de los cálices renales por parte de urólogos tanto en formación como en ejercicio actual de la especialidad sin dificultad.El modelo también permitió la utilización de cestillas y la movilización y extracción de litiasis previamente colocadas.Conclusión Damos a conocer un modelo tridimensional válido para ejercicios de formación en ureteroscopia flexible con unos costes razonables, que permitirá adquirir la destreza y la confianza necesaria para iniciar el procedimiento en un escenario real (AU)

Introduction Training in experimental models is a valid option that improves the outcomes and shortens surgical learning curves.Our objective was to develop a 3D printed plastic model for teaching, training and education in flexible ureteroscopy, analyzing costs and suitability for the practice of this surgical technique.Methods A 3D printed model was developed based on a CT scan from a real-life patient's upper urinary tract. HorosTM software was used for segmentation and an FDM-Ultimaker for 3D printing.Renal calyces were numbered to be identified, as in the European Association of Urology Endoscopic Stone Treatment training curriculum, Task 4.The following were used: Innovex single-use flexible ureteroscope (Palex) and nitinol baskets (Coloplast).Results Printing time was 19hours, with a total cost of €8.77.The three-dimensional model allowed the insertion of the flexible ureteroscope and the exploration of the renal calyces by urologists in training as well as in current practice of the specialty without difficulty.The model also allowed the use of baskets and the mobilization and removal of previously placed stones.Conclusion We unveil a valid three-dimensional model for flexible ureteroscopy training exercises with reasonable costs, which will allow acquiring the necessary skills and confidence to initiate the procedure in a real-life scenario (AU)

3D printed model for flexible ureteroscopy training, a low-cost option for surgical training.

INTRODUCTION: Training in experimental models is a valid option that improves the outcomes and shortens surgical learning curves. Our objective was to develop a 3D printed plastic model for teaching, training and education in flexible ureteroscopy, analyzing costs and suitability for the practice of this surgical technique. METHODS: A 3D printed model was developed based on a CT scan from a real-life patient's upper urinary tract. Horos™ software was used for segmentation and an FDM-Ultimaker for 3D printing. Renal calyces were numbered to be identified, as in the European Association of Urology Endoscopic Stone Treatment training curriculum, Task 4. The following were used: Innovex single-use flexible ureteroscope (Palex) and nitinol baskets (Coloplast). RESULTS: Printing time was 19 h, with a total cost of €8.77. The three-dimensional model allowed the insertion of the flexible ureteroscope and the exploration of the renal calyces by urologists in training as well as in current practice of the specialty without difficulty. The model also allowed the use of baskets and the mobilization and removal of previously placed stones. CONCLUSION: We unveil a valid three-dimensional model for flexible ureteroscopy training exercises with reasonable costs, which will allow acquiring the necessary skills and confidence to initiate the procedure in a real-life scenario.

Predictive risk factors of urinary tract infection following flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of current study was to evaluate prevalence of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTI) following flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and to determine predictive factors for those UTIs. METHODS: A total of 420 patients with urolithiasis that underwent f-URS between August 2018 and August 2019 were enrolled in the study. Peri-operative characteristics of patients with and without postoperative UTIs were compared using univariate analyses. Predictive factors for UTIs following f-URS were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one (9.8%) out of 420 patients had postoperative urinary infection after f-URS and those patients were classified as group 1. Group 2 consisted of 379 patients that did not develop postoperative UTIs. The percentage of female gender was 58.5% vs 42% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.042). The preoperative UTI history rate was 51.2% vs 20.8% (p<0.001) and preoperative double J stent (DJS) insertion rate 39% vs 17.7% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.001). Univariate regression analyses showed that the female gender (OR=1.98), history of UTI (OR=3.99), and preoperative DJS insertion (OR=2.98) significantly increased the possibility of postoperative UTI (p<0.05). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that history of UTI (OR=3.41, 95%CI:1.73-6.72, p<0.001) and preoperative DJS insertion (OR=2.30, 95%CI:1.13-4.68, p=0.021) were independent risk factors for infectious complications following f-URS. If both factors are present, the probability of infection is 55.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Even if f-URS is considered a safe procedure, the risk of postoperative infectious complications is far from negligible. We found that the presence of UTI history and preoperative DJS were independent risk factors for UTI after f-URS.

OBJETIVOS: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de las infecciones del tracto urinario (UTI) postoperatorias después de la ureteroscopia flexible (f-URS) y determinar los factores predictivos de esas infecciones. MÉTODOS: Se inscribieron en el estudio un total de420 pacientes con urolitiasis que se sometieron a f-URSentre agosto de 2018 y agosto de 2019. Las característicasperioperatorias de los pacientes con y sin ITUUTI postoperatorias se compararon mediante análisisunivariados. Los factores predictivos de las infeccionesurinarias después de f-URS se determinaron mediante unanálisis de regresión logística multivariante. RESULTADOS: Cuarenta y uno (9,8%) de 420 pacientes tuvieron infección urinaria postoperatoria después de f-URS y esos pacientes se clasificaron como grupo 1. El grupo 2 consistió en 379 pacientes que no desarrollaron UTI postoperatorias. El porcentaje de sexo femenino fue del 58,5% frente al 42% en los grupos 1 y 2, respectivamente (p=0,042). La tasa de antecedentes de UTI preoperatoria fue del 51,2% frente al 20,8% (p<0,001) y la tasa de inserción preoperatoria de un stent doble J (DJS) del 39% frente al 17,7% en los grupos 1 y 2, respectivamente (p=0,001). Los análisis de regresión univariante mostraron que el sexo femenino (OR=1,98), los antecedentes de UTI (OR=3,99) y la inserción preoperatoria de DJS (OR=2,98) aumentaron significativamente la posibilidad de UTI postoperatoria (p<0,05). Los análisis de regresión multivariante revelaron que los antecedentes de UTI (OR=3,41, IC del 95%: 1,73­6,72, p<0,001) y la inserción preoperatoria de DJS (OR=2,30, IC del 95%: 1,13­4,68, p=0,021) eran factores de riesgo independientes para las complicaciones infecciosas después de f-URS. Si ambos factores están presentes, la probabilidad de infección es del 55,2%. CONCLUSIONES: Incluso si la f-URS se considera un procedimiento seguro, el riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias está lejos de ser insignificante. Encontramos que la presencia de antecedentes de UTI y la DJS preoperatoria eran factores de riesgo independientes de UTI después de f-URS.

Factores de riesgo predictivos de infección del tracto urinario después de la litotricia ureteroscópica flexible / Predictive risk factors for urinary tract infection after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Objetivos: El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la prevalencia de las infecciones deltracto urinario (UTI) postoperatorias después de la ureteroscopia flexible (f-URS) y determinar los factores predictivos de esas infecciones. Métodos: Se inscribieron en el estudio un total de 420 pacientes con urolitiasis que se sometieron a f-URS entre agosto de 2018 y agosto de 2019. Las características perioperatorias de los pacientes con y sin ITUUTI postoperatorias se compararon mediante análisis univariados. Los factores predictivos de las infecciones urinarias después de f-URS se determinaron mediante un análisis de regresión logística multivariante. Resultados: Cuarenta y uno (9,8%) de 420 pacientes tuvieron infección urinaria postoperatoria despuésde f-URS y esos pacientes se clasificaron como grupo 1. El grupo 2 consistió en 379 pacientes que no desarrollaron UTI postoperatorias. El porcentaje de sexofemenino fue del 58,5% frente al 42% en los grupos 1 y 2, respectivamente (p=0,042). La tasa de antecedentes de UTI preoperatoria fue del 51,2% frente al 20,8% (p<0,001) y la tasa de inserción preoperatoria de un stent doble J (DJS) del 39% frente al 17,7% en los grupos 1 y 2, respectivamente (p=0,001). Los análisis deregresión univariante mostraron que el sexo femenino (OR=1,98), los antecedentes de UTI (OR=3,99) y la inserción preoperatoria de DJS (OR=2,98) aumentaron significativamente la posibilidad de UTI postoperatoria (p<0,05). Los análisis de regresión multivariante revelaron que los antecedentes de UTI (OR=3,41, IC del95%: 1,73–6,72, p<0,001) y la inserción preoperatoria de DJS (OR=2,30, IC del 95%: 1,13–4,68,p=0,021) eran factores de riesgo independientes para las complicaciones infecciosas después de f-URS. Si ambos factores están presentes, la probabilidad de infección es del 55,2%.(AU)

Objectives: The goal of current study was to evaluate prevalence of postoperative urinary tract infections (UTI) following flexible ureteroscopy (f-URS) and to determine predictive factors for those UTIs. Methods: A total of 420 patients with urolithiasis that underwent f-URS between August 2018 and August 2019 were enrolled in the study. Peri-operative characteristics of patients with and without postoperative UTIs were compared using univariate analyses. Predictive factors for UTIs following f-URS were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Forty-one (9.8%) out of 420 patients had postoperative urinary infection after f-URS and those patients were classified as group 1. Group 2 consisted of 379 patients that did not develop postoperative UTIs. The percentage of female gender was 58.5% vs 42% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.042). The preoperative UTI history rate was 51.2% vs 20.8% (p<0.001)and preoperative double J stent (DJS) insertion rate 39% vs 17.7% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.001). Univariate regression analyses showed that the female gender (OR=1.98), history of UTI (OR=3.99), and preoperative DJS insertion (OR=2.98) significantly increased the possibility of postoperative UTI (p<0.05).Multivariate regression analyses revealed that history of UTI (OR=3.41, 95%CI:1.73–6.72, p<0.001) and preoperative DJS insertion (OR=2.30, 95%CI:1.13–4.68,p=0.021) were independent risk factors for infectious complications following f-URS. If both factors are present, the probability of infection is 55.2%.Conclusions: Even if f-URS is considered a safe procedure, the risk of postoperative infectious complications is far from negligible. We found that the presence of UTI history and preoperative DJS were independent risk factors for UTI after f-URS.(AU)

Comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 2 and 3cm renal lithiasis. / Comparación entre nefrolitotomía percutánea y ureteroscopia flexible para el tratamiento de litiasis renales de entre 2 y 3cm.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: The first-line treatment for >2cm lithiasis is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), leaving flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) as a second option. In the present review, the stone-free rate and the complications of both techniques were evaluated in the treatment of 2-3cm stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Systematic review of studies that compared both techniques. Studies that were not comparative, as well as those carried out in the pediatric population or with <2cm or>3cm stones, were excluded. Two researchers independently performed the investigation, obtaining 5 studies that made up a total of 815 patients: 252 belonged to the fURS group and 563 to the PNL group. Four studies were retrospective, and one was non-randomized prospective. RESULTS: Stone-free rate ranged between 47.0% and 95.0% for the fURS and between 87.0% and 100% for the PNL. The complication rate was 8.8-29.0% in the fURS and 11.9-27.0% in the PNL. fURS required a greater number of procedures, and had a lower decrease in haemoglobin and creatinine rise compared to PNL. CONCLUSIONS: The stone-free rate was higher for PNL, although the fURS could reach comparable results at the expense of performing several procedures. Both techniques have a similar frequency of complications, but the PNL has more postsurgical analytical alterations.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal lithiasis smaller than 2 CM. / Cirugía retrógrada intrarrenal y micro-nefrolitectomía percutánea en la litiasis renal menor de 2 cm.

INTRODUCTION: Microperc is the upgraded form of percutaneous nephrolithotomy miniaturization. The aim of this study is to compare prospectively microperc and retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative prospective study of both techniques was carried out between January 2014 and June 2015. Thirty-five patients were divided in two groups: Group A, 17 patients treated by retrograde intrarenal surgery and Group B, 18 patients treated by microperc. Stone clearance was assessed using CT scan 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Both groups were statistically comparable as demographic variables and stone size was similar (16.76 mm Group A vs 15.72 mm Group B). Success rate, hospital stay and JJ stenting were similar for both groups. There was no statistically significant difference regarding post-operatory complications: 17.64% Group A vs 5.56% Group B (p=0,062), all of them Clavien I and II. Surgical time was statistically different (63.82 min Group A vs 103.24 min Group B) as well as hemoglobin drop (0.62 g/dl Group A and 1.89 g/dl Group B). CONCLUSION: Microperc is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of renal lithiasis smaller than 2 cm, which makes it a good alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery for this stone size. However, more prospective studies that include a larger cohort are necessary to confirm our results.

Comparative analysis between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in kidney stones of 2-3cm. / Análisis comparativo entre nefrolitotomía percutánea y ureteroscopia flexible en litiasis renal de 2-3cm.

INTRODUCTION: To compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for treating kidney stones between 2 and 3cm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, comparative, nonrandomised study was conducted with 108 patients with kidney stones between 2 and 3cm. Fifty-four patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 54 underwent flexible ureteroscopy. We compared the following variables: lithiasis-free rate (%), surgical time, the need for an auxiliary process, postoperative complications, hospital stay, readmission rates and recovery time. RESULTS: There were no differences in the lithiasis-free rate between the 2 surgical techniques (76% for ureteroscopy vs. 87% for nephrolithotomy; P=.1) or in the complications (29% for nephrolithotomy vs. 27% for ureteroscopy; P=.4). A larger number of auxiliary process were needed for the ureteroscopy group (20%) than for the nephrolithotomy group (7%) (P=.04). The surgical time was longer for the nephrolithotomy group (121±52min) than for the ureteroscopy group (93±42min) (P=.004). The ureteroscopy group had shorter hospital stays (2.1±1.6 vs. 3.9±1.9 days; P=.002), shorter convalescence (8.1±4.9 vs. 13.3±4.2 days; P=.005) and higher readmission rates (7.4% vs. 0%, P=.05) than the nephrolithotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy have similar efficacy for treating kidney stones measuring 2-3cm, with no differences in complications. Ureteroscopy results in shorter hospital stays, quicker recoveries but more readmissions and a greater need for auxiliary procedures.

Desarrollo de un checklist para la técnica de nefroureterolitototomía endoscópica flexible en un modelo simulado mediante el método de delphi modioficado / Development of a checklist for the technique of flexible endoscopic nephroureterlithotomy in a simulated model by the modifiet delphy method

Introducción: La simulación en medicina está cobrando cada vez mayor importancia, principalmente en el área quirúrgica, ya que nos otorga la posibilidad de lograr el aprendizaje de forma segura, bajo ambiente controlado y reproducible. Nuestro objetivo es establecer una pauta estructurada de realización de ureteroscopía flexible para un procedimiento simulado de nefro-ureterolitotomía endoscópica.Material y métodos. Se utilizó el método de Delphi modificado. Se contactó vía correo electrónico a cinco urólogos a los cuales se les envió un checklist para la evaluación de la técnica del procedimiento de 1 a 7, agregando comentarios. Basado en esto, se modifica el checklist en 2 oportunidades, hasta lograr el consenso.Resultados. Se obtiene una la versión definitiva del checklist. Esta consta de 20 puntos, con una media que fluctúa entre 5,6 y 7, y una mediana entre 6 y 7. El coeficiente de Cronbach para establecer su consistencia interna es de 0,86.Conclusión. Se establece un listado estándar para la realización de nefro-ureterolitotomíaendoscópica flexible utilizando el método de Delphi modificado.(AU)

Introduction: The simulation in medicine is becoming increasingly important, mainly in the surgical area, because it gives us the possibility to achieve learning safely, in a controlled and reproducible environment. Our objective is to establish a structured guideline of flexible ureteroscopy for a simulated endoscopic nephro ureterolithotomy procedure.Material y Methods. The modified Delphi method was used. Five urologists were contacted via email, a checklist was sent for the evaluation of the procedure technique from 1 to 7, adding comments. Based on this, the checklist is modified 2 times, until consensus is reached.Results. A final version of the checklist is obtained. It consists in 20 points, with a mean that fluctuates between 5.6 and 7, and a median between 6 and 7. The Cronbach coefficient to establish its internal consistency is 0, 86.Conclusion. A standard list is established using the modified Delphi method for the performance of flexible endoscopic nephro-ureterolithotomy.(AU)

Unplanned flexible ureteroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position.

BACKGROUND: Over time, the prone position has been shown to be effective and safe for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. One of its disadvantages, however, is the inability to simultaneously perform an ureteroscopy after positioning the patient, which is feasible in the supine position. Our objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing flexible ureteroscopy with the patient in the prone position. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of percutaneous nephrolithotomy of partial staghorn calculi in the prone position during which access to the middle calyx was not possible. It was therefore necessary to conduct flexible ureteroscopy. The 64-year-old female patient had consulted for lumbar pain of 6 months of evolution. RESULTS: We performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position. After extracting calculi from the inner calyx and renal pelvis, access to the fragments located in the middle calyx could not be achieved. Rather than performing a new puncture, we decided to enter in a retrograde manner with a flexible ureteroscope, succeeding in extracting the residual calculi, leaving the patient completely free of calculi. CONCLUSION: In our case, the implementation of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy was feasible without changing the patient's original position.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy in the primary treatment of renal lithiasis.

INTRODUCTION: retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) appears as a safe and effective technique as well as a good therapeutic alternative to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: descriptive study in 50 patients surgically treated between November 2012 and April 2013. Demographic, operative and postoperative data as well as early and late complications data were collected. The minimum follow-up of patients was one year. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia. Flexible ureteroscopy with ureteral access sheath and laser fragmentation were employed. Surgery success was defined as stone free rate in postoperative control test and at three months after surgery (simple radiography, abdominal ultrasound or CT without contrast). RESULTS: mean age was 51.1±15.5 years old. The highest-frequency location was the lower calyceal group (26%), single stones were described in 58% of patients whilst multiple lithiasis were found in the 42%. Regarding the stone burden in 44% of the patients was low (<2 cm), and high (>3 cm) in 22% of the patients. The stone clearance rate was 89.7±17.5. Average surgery time was 96.6±35.2min. Complications were reported in 4 patients (8%), all of them early ones and minor in nature. CONCLUSIONS: RIRS is an effective and safe option whose results are comparable to ESWL and PCNL. RIRS can be considered as first-line treatment. These results are corroborated by numerous studies. To strengthen these findings, prospective studies focusing on quality of life, length of stay, complications and cost-effectiveness of different treatments are needed.

Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this prospective study are to present our experience with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and to analyze its results and complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 150 patients with renal stones were treated with RIRS. 111 cases showed single stones whilst multiple stones were observed in 39 cases. The mean size was 19.12mm (r: 5-74). Success rate was defined as the absence of residual stones or the presence of fragments ≤2mm. RESULTS: in 21 (14%) patients RIRS could not be performed on first attempt because it was impossible to place the ureteral access sheath. The immediate success rate was 85.7%, and 91.6% at three months later. The average operating time was 85min (r: 25-220). Postoperative complications were observed in 22 cases (14.6%), although most of them were classified as Clavien 1 and 2 (19 cases), and only 2% (3 cases) showed Clavien 4 complications (sepsis requiring admission in the intensive care unit). 10 patients underwent a second procedure in order to complete the treatment. Thus, the number of procedures per patient was 1.06. There were no late complications. CONCLUSIONS: the treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy using the ureteral access sheath shows a high successful rate with a low complication rate. In order to define its indication more precisely, randomized studies comparing RIRS with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures (miniperc and microperc) would be necessary.

Ureteroscopia flexible: experiencia inicial / Flexible ureteroscopy: initial experience

Introducción: El desarrollo tecnológico y el aporte a la ingeniería a la urología, han permitido un impresionante avance en el campo de la endourología. La ureteroscopia flexible ha ganado cada vez más espacio tanto como método diagnóstico y terapéutico. Presentamos nuestra experiencia inicial en ureteroscopia flexible. Material y métodos: Entre marzo y noviembre de 2009 realizamos 13 ureteroscopias flexibles. Se utilizó un ureteroscopio flexible URF-V, Olympus. Se analizaron el demográficas y quirúrgicas. Se describe la técnica quirúrgica. Resultados: Se realizaron un total de 9 ureteroscopias flexibles en 7 hombres y 6 mujeres. El promedio de edad fue de 55 años En 5 casos la indicación del procedimiento fue un defecto de llene en la tomografía axial computada. En 6 casos la indicación fue por litiasis. En un caso la indicación fue por un catéter doble j que se desplazó hacia proximal y en un caso fue por hematuria lateralizada. El manejo de las litiasis se realizó mediante litotricia intracorpórea con láser Holmium 20 Watts. El doble j desplazado se extrajo con dormia. En los defectos de llene, se realizaron biopsias y una fulguración de hemangioma en el caso de la hematuria. No se registraron complicaciones. Discusión: La constante evolución tecnológica ha permitido la expansión de la ureteroscopia flexible tanto en el uso diagnóstico como terapéutico. Las complicaciones cada vez son menos frecuentes, convirtiéndolo en un procedimiento seguro y eficaz para el manejo tanto de patología litiásica como de otras alteraciones de la vía urinaria.

Introduction: Technology developments and engineering support to urology has allowed for great progress in the field of endourology. Flexible ureteroscopy has earned its place as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool. We present our initial experience in flexible ureteroscopy. Material and Methods: Between March and November 2009 we performed 9 flexible uretroscopies. We used a URF-V Olympus flexible ureteroscope. Demographic and surgical variables were analyzed. Surgical technique is described. Results: We performed 9 flexible ureteroscopies in 7 men and 6 women. Mean age was 55 years. In 5 cases surgical indication was a filling defect on CT scan. In 6 cases the indication was urolithiasis. In one case the indication was a retained ureteral stent and in another case lateralized hematuria.Stones were managed with a 20 Watts Holmium laser. The retained ureteral stent was retrieved with a dormia. The filling defects were managed with biopsy and fulguration of a haemangioma in the case of the lateralized hematuria. There were no complications. Conclusion: Constant technology evolution allowed expansion of the use of flexible ureteroscopy, making this procedure a safe and effective alternative for the management urinary stones and other diseases of the urinary tract.