Significant increase of emergency hernia operation during COVID.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, elective surgeries including hernia repairs, were postponed, or cancelled completely. However, it has been stated previously that the volume of surgical emergency hernia repairs did not drop during this period. Due to the disruption in elective surgeries, waiting lists have increased rapidly, causing a suspected treatment delay. To gain improved insight in preoperative patient prioritization, the aim of this multicenter study was to track volumes of hernia surgery before, during and after the pandemic to investigate for a shift from elective towards emergency hernia surgery. METHODS: A retrospective study using hernia databases from four regional hospitals to account for altered referral patterns (elective versus emergent), capturing patients' admissions and surgery times for both groin and ventral hernia repair was conducted. Study period was predefined from March 2019 to March 2023. Data are presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During the historic period, 106 of 2267 hernia surgeries (4.7%) performed were defined as emergency repairs. During the pandemic, 3864 elective surgeries were executed, of which 213(5.5%) emergencies. During the current period, the portion of emergencies dropped to 4.9% (110 emergency hernia repairs); (p = 0.039). A non-significant increase in emergent incisional hernia repair during the pandemic period was found chronologically 9.9%, 11.8% and 11.6% emergent repairs(p = 0.75). There were no statistically significant differences across the hernia types in elective versus urgent rate. RESULTS: During the historic period, 106 of 2267 hernia surgeries (4.7%) performed were defined as emergency repairs. During the pandemic, 3864 elective surgeries were executed, of which 213(5.5%) emergencies. During the current period, the portion of emergencies dropped to 4.9% (110 emergency hernia repairs); (p = 0.039). A non-significant increase in emergent incisional hernia repair during the pandemic period was found chronologically 9.9%, 11.8% and 11.6% emergent repairs(p = 0.75). There were no statistically significant differences across the hernia types in elective versus urgent rate. DISCUSSION: Regionwide data showed a 15% decline in hernia repairs during the pandemic compared to historical levels, with an 0.8% increase in emergent repairs. Surgery rates are still convalescent after the pandemic, with a persistent proportion of emergent surgeries. These numbers emphasize the challenges in selecting patient whose hernia repair should not be postponed.

Urgent versus elective surgical disparities among American Indian and Alaska Native patients.

BACKGROUND: American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) health issues are understudied despite documentation of lower-than-average life expectancy. Urgent surgery is associated with higher rates of postsurgical complications and postoperative death. We assess whether American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) patients in Washington State are at greater risk of requiring urgent rather than elective surgery compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS: We accessed data for the period 2009-2014 from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) database, which captures all statewide hospital admissions, to examine three common surgeries that are performed both urgently and electively: hip replacements, aortic valve replacements, and spinal fusions. We extracted patient race, age, insurance status, comorbidity, admission type, and procedures performed. We then constructed multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with use of urgent surgical care. RESULTS: AIAN patients had lower mean age at surgery for all three surgeries compared with NHW patients. AIAN patients were at higher risk for urgent surgery for hip replacements (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.19-1.88), spinal fusions (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.87), and aortic valve replacements (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.12-3.80). CONCLUSION: AIAN patients were more likely to undergo urgent hip replacement, spinal fusion, and aortic valve replacement than NHW patients. AIAN patients underwent urgent surgery at younger ages. Medicaid insurance conferred higher risks for urgent surgery across all surgeries studied. Further research is warranted to more clearly identify the factors contributing to disparities among AIAN patients undergoing urgent surgery.

Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Emergency Surgery in Patients With Spinal Metastases: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the patient characteristics and outcomes of emergency surgery for spinal metastases and identify risk factors for emergency surgery. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 216 patients with spinal metastases who underwent palliative surgery from 2015 to 2020. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Barthel index, EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D), and neurological function were assessed at surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for emergency surgery. RESULTS: In total, 146 patients underwent nonemergency surgery and 70 patients underwent emergency surgery within 48 hours of diagnosis of a surgical indication. After propensity score matching, we compared 61 patients each who underwent nonemergency and emergency surgery. Regardless of matching, the median performance status and the mean Barthel index and EQ5D score showed a tendency toward worse outcomes in the emergency than nonemergency group both preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively, although the surgery greatly improved these values in both groups. The median survival time tended to be shorter in the emergency than nonemergency group. The multivariate analysis showed that lesions located at T3-10 (p = 0.002; odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-5.75) and Frankel grades A-C (p < 0.001; OR, 4.91; 95% CI, 2.45-9.86) were independent risk factors for emergency surgery. CONCLUSION: Among patients with spinal metastases, preoperative and postoperative subjective health values and postoperative survival are poorer in emergency than nonemergency surgery. Close attention to patients with T3-10 metastases is required to avoid poor outcomes after emergency surgery.

Prioritising patients for semi-urgent surgery: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Semi-urgent surgery where surgical intervention is required within 48 h of admission and the patient is medically stable is vulnerable to scheduling delays. Given the challenges in accessing health care, there is a need for a detailed understanding of the factors that impact decisions on scheduling semi-urgent surgeries. AIM: To identify and describe the organisational, departmental and contextual factors that determine healthcare professionals' prioritising patients for semi-urgent surgeries. METHODS: We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Four online databases were used: EBSCO Academic Search Complete, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, OVID Embase and EBSCO Medline. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they published in English and focussed on the scheduling of patients for surgery were included. Data were extracted by one author and checked by another and analysed descriptively. Findings were synthesises using the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework. RESULTS: Twelve articles published between 1999 and 2022 were included. The Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework highlighted themes of emergency surgery scheduling and its impact on operating room utilisation. Gaps in the management of operating room utilisation and the incorporation of semi-urgent surgeries into operating schedules were also identified. Finally, the lack of consensus on the definition of semi-urgent surgery and the parameters used to assign surgical acuity to patients was evident. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review identified patterns in the scheduling methods, and involvement of key decision makers. Yet there is limited evidence about how key decision makers reach consensus on prioritising patients for semi-urgent surgery and its impact on patient experience. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Effect of urgent surgery within 8 hours compared to surgery between 8 and 24 hours on perioperative complications and neurological prognosis in patients older than 70 years with cervical spinal cord injury: a propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of surgery within 8 hours on perioperative complications and neurological prognosis in older patients with cervical spinal cord injury by using a propensity score-matched analysis. METHODS: The authors included 87 consecutive patients older than 70 years who had cervical spinal cord injury and who had undergone posterior decompression and fusion surgery within 24 hours of injury. The patients were divided into two groups based on the time from injury to surgery: surgery within 8 hours (group 8 hours) and between 8 and 24 hours (group 8-24 hours). Following the preliminary study, the authors established a 1:1 matched model using propensity scores to adjust for baseline characteristics and neurological status on admission. Perioperative complication rates and neurological outcomes at discharge were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Preliminary analysis of 87 prematched patients (39 in group 8 hours and 48 in group 8-24 hours) revealed that the motor index score (MIS) on admission was lower for lower extremities (12.3 ± 15.5 vs 20.0 ± 18.6, respectively; p = 0.048), and total extremities (26.7 ± 27.1 vs 40.2 ± 30.6, respectively; p = 0.035) in group 8 hours. In terms of perioperative complications, group 8 hours had significantly higher rates of cardiopulmonary dysfunction (46.2% vs 25.0%, respectively; p = 0.039). MIS improvement (the difference in scores between admission and discharge) was greater in group 8 hours for lower extremities (15.8 ± 12.6 vs 9.0 ± 10.5, respectively; p = 0.009) and total extremities (29.4 ± 21.7 vs 18.7 ± 17.7, respectively; p = 0.016). Using a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, 29 patient pairs from group 8 hours and group 8-24 hours were selected. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, neurological status on admission, and perioperative complications between the two groups, including cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Even after matching, MIS improvement was significantly greater in group 8 hours for upper extremities (13.0 ± 10.9 vs 7.8 ± 8.3, respectively; p = 0.045), lower extremities (14.8 ± 12.7 vs 8.3 ± 11.0, respectively; p = 0.044) and total extremities (27.8 ± 21.0 vs 16.0 ± 17.5, respectively; p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Results of the comparison after matching demonstrated that urgent surgery within 8 hours did not increase the perioperative complication rate and significantly improved the MIS, suggesting that surgery within 8 hours may be efficient, even in older patients.

Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Complicated diverticulitis is a common abdominal emergency that often requires a surgical intervention. The systematic review and meta-analysis below compare the benefits and harms of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery in patients with complicated colonic diverticular disease. Methods: The following databases were searched before 1 March 2023: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The internal validity of the selected non-randomized studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) and Copenhagen Trial Unit Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) software (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark), respectively. Results: We found no relevant randomized controlled trials in the searched databases. Therefore, we analyzed 5 non-randomized studies with satisfactory internal validity and similar designs comprising a total of 442 patients (184 (41.6%) robotic and 258 (58.4%) laparoscopic interventions). The analysis revealed that robotic surgery for complicated diverticulitis (CD) took longer than laparoscopy (MD = 42 min; 95% CI: [-16, 101]). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups regarding intraoperative blood loss (MD = -9 mL; 95% CI: [-26, 8]) and the rate of conversion to open surgery (2.17% or 4/184 for robotic surgery vs. 6.59% or 17/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.63; 95% CI: [0.10, 4.00]). The type of surgery did not affect the length of in-hospital stay (MD = 0.18; 95% CI: [-0.60, 0.97]) or the rate of postoperative complications (14.1% or 26/184 for robotic surgery vs. 19.8% or 51/258 for laparoscopy; RR = 0.81; 95% CI: [0.52, 1.26]). No deaths were reported in either group. Discussion: The meta-analysis suggests that robotic surgery is an appropriate option for managing complicated diverticulitis. It is associated with a trend toward a lower rate of conversion to open surgery and fewer postoperative complications; however, this trend does not reach the level of statistical significance. Since no high quality RCTs were available, this meta-analysis isnot able to provide reliable conclusion, but only a remarkable lack of proper evidence supporting robotic technology. The need for further evidence-based trials is important.

Hemorragia digestiva baja: factores de riesgo de gravedad, necesidad de cirugía de urgencia y mortalidad hospitalaria / Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: risk factors of severity, need for emergency surgery and in-hospital Mortality

RESUMEN Antecedentes: Últimamente creció el interés en poder determinar, en etapas tempranas de las hemorragias digestivas bajas (HDB), aquellos factores de riesgo relacionados con la posibilidad de presentar resultados evolutivos adversos. Objectivo: Determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a sangrados graves, cirugía de urgencia y mortalidad hospitalaria. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio observacional y retrospectivo sobre 1.850 pacientes, atendidos en forma consecutiva entre enero de 1999 y diciembre de 2018 por HDB. Para evaluar el riesgo de gravedad analizamos trece variables en las primeras cuatro horas desde la admisión. Para determinar los factores relacionados con la cirugía de urgencia, agregamos la enfermedad diverticular y, para evaluar mortalidad, la cirugía de urgencia y el puntaje (score) preoperatorio de la Sociedad Americana de Anestesiología (ASA). Resultados: De los 1.850 casos, 194 fueron graves y 1656 leves/moderados. Resultaron estadísticamente significativos como factores de mayor gravedad: > 70 años, FC > 120 lat/min., TA < 90 mm Hg, oliguria, hematoquecia masiva, hematocrito < 30%, hemoglobina < 7 g/% y necesidad transfusional. Resultaron predictores significativos de cirugía de urgencia: > 70 años, anti-coagulación, hipotensión arterial, taquicardia, hemoglobina < 7 g/%, oliguria, transfusiones y hematoquecia masiva. Se construyó una fórmula pronóstica de requerimiento de cirugía (sensibilidad 94%, especificidad 74%, valor predictivo positivo 91% y valor predictivo negativo 81%). AUC: 0,89%. Fueron significativos para mortalidad: > 70 años, anticoagulados, hematoquecia masiva, transfusiones y cirugía urgente. De los dieciséis pacientes operados y fallecidos de la serie, quince presentaban un ASA ≥ IV. Conclusiones: Las variables utilizadas resultaron simples, fiables y estadísticamente significativas para predecir gravedad, cirugía de urgencia y mortalidad.

ABSTRACT Background: Background: There has been a growing interest in determining those risk factors associated with adverse outcomes in early stages of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). Objective: The aim of our study was to analyze the risk factors associated with severe bleeding, emergency surgery and in-hospital mortality. Material and methods: We conducted an observational and retrospective study on 1850 patients consecutive managed between January 1999 and December 2018 for LGIB. We analyzed thirteen variables within the first four hours of hospitalization to evaluate risk severity. Diverticular disease was considered to determine factors associated with emergency surgery, and the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was used to assess mortality and emergency surgery. Results: Out of 1850 cases, 194 were severe and 1656 were mild/moderate, Patients > 70 years, with HR > 120 beats/min, BP < 90 mm Hg, oliguria, massive hematochezia, hematocrit < 30%, hemoglobin < 7 g% and need for transfusions presented statistically significant associations with severe bleeding. Age > 70 years, anticoagulation, hypotension, tachycardia, hemoglobin < 7 g%, oliguria, need for transfusion and massive hematochezia were significant predictors of emergency surgery. A prognostic formula was constructed to predict the need for surgery (sensitivity 94%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 91% and negative predictive value 81%). AUC-ROC: 0,89%. Age > 70 years, anticoagulation, massive hematochezia transfusions and emergency surgery were identified as predictors of mortality. Fifteen of the sixteen patients who underwent surgery and died had ASA ≥ grade 4. Conclusions: The variables analyzed are simple, reliable and statistically significant to estimate the risk of severe bleeding, need for emergency surgery and mortality.

Association of Cumulative Colorectal Surgery Hospital Costs, Readmissions, and Emergency Department/Observation Stays with Insurance Type.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program disproportionately penalizes safety-net hospitals (SNH) caring for vulnerable populations. This study assessed the association of insurance type with 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays (EDOS), readmissions, and cumulative costs in colorectal surgery patients. METHODS: Retrospective inpatient cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) with cost data in a SNH. The odds of EDOS and readmissions and cumulative variable (index hospitalization and all 30-day EDOS and readmissions) costs were modeled adjusting for frailty, case status, presence of a stoma, and open versus laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: The cohort had 245 private, 195 Medicare, and 590 Medicaid/uninsured cases, with a mean age 55.0 years (SD = 13.3) and 52.9% of the cases were performed on male patients. Most cases were open surgeries (58.7%). Complication rates were 41.8%, EDOS 12.0%, and readmissions 20.1%. Medicaid/uninsured had increased odds of urgent/emergent surgeries (aOR = 2.15, CI = 1.56-2.98, p < 0.001) and complications (aOR = 1.43, CI = 1.02-2.03, p = 0.042) versus private patients. Medicaid/uninsured versus private patients had higher EDOS (16.6% versus 4.1%) and readmissions (22.9% versus 14.3%) rates and higher odds of EDOS (aOR = 4.81, CI = 2.57-10.06, p < 0.001), and readmissions (aOR = 1.62, CI = 1.07-2.50, p = 0.025), while Medicare patients had similar odds versus private. Cumulative variable cost %change was increased for Medicare and Medicaid/uninsured, but Medicaid/uninsured was similar to private after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases. CONCLUSIONS: Increased urgent/emergent cases in Medicaid/uninsured populations drive increased complications odds and higher costs compared to private patients, suggesting lack of access to outpatient care. SNH care for higher cost populations, receive lower reimbursements, and are penalized by value-based programs. Increasing healthcare access for Medicaid/uninsured patients could reduce urgent/emergent surgeries, resulting in fewer complications, EDOS/readmissions, and costs.

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.

Robotically assisted operations are the state of the art in laparoscopic general surgery. They are established predominantly for elective operations. Since laparoscopy is widely used in urgent general surgery, the significance of robotic assistance in urgent operations is of interest. Currently, there are few data on robotic-assisted operations in urgent surgery. The aim of this study was to collect and classify the existing studies. A two-stage, PRISMA-compliant literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted. We analyzed all articles on robotic surgery associated with urgent general surgery resp. acute surgical diseases of the abdomen. Gynecological and urological diseases so as vascular surgery, except mesenterial ischemia, were excluded. Studies and case reports/series published between 1980 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. In addition to a descriptive synopsis, various outcome parameters were systematically recorded. Fifty-two studies of operations for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis, hernias and acute conditions of the gastrointestinal tract were included. The level of evidence is low. Surgical robots in the narrow sense and robotic camera mounts were used. All narrow-sense robots are nonautonomous systems; in 82%, the Da Vinci® system was used. The most frequently published emergency operations were urgent cholecystectomies (30 studies, 703 patients) followed by incarcerated hernias (9 studies, 199 patients). Feasibility of robotic operations was demonstrated for all indications. Neither robotic-specific problems nor extensive complication rates were reported. Various urgent operations in general surgery can be performed robotically without increased risk. The available data do not allow a final evidence-based assessment.

Establishing a COVID-secure site for elective surgery during the COVID pandemic: An observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Maintaining timely and safe delivery of major elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is essential to manage cancer and time-critical surgical conditions. Our NHS Trust established a COVID-secure elective site with a level 2 Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) facility. Patients requiring level 3 Intensive Care Unit admission were transferred to a non-COVID-secure site. We investigated the relationship between perioperative anaesthetic care and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing major surgery at the COVID-secure site between June and November 2020 were included. Patient demographics, operative interventions and 30-day outcomes were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds ratio of outcomes according to PACU length of stay and the use of spinal or epidural anaesthesia, with age, sex, malignancy status and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade as independent co-variables. RESULTS: There were 280 patients. PACU length of stay >23h was associated with increased 30-day complications. Epidural anaesthesia was associated with PACU length of stay >23h, increased total length of stay, increase hospital transfer and 30-day complications. Two patients acquired nosocomial COVID-19 following hospital transfer. DISCUSSION: Establishing a separate COVID-secure site has facilitated delivery of major elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Choice of perioperative anaesthesia and utilisation of PACU appear likely to affect the risk of adverse outcomes.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ectopic pregnancy presentation and treatment: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: We examined ectopic pregnancy (EP) incidence, presentation and management, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and following initiation of vaccination against COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared incidence, presentation and management of EP, between 98 women who presented during the pandemic (March 1 2020 to August 31, 2021), and 94 women diagnosed earlier (March 1 2018 to August 31, 2019). Sub-periods before and after introduction of the vaccination were compared. RESULTS: Age and parity were similar between the periods. For the pandemic compared to the earlier period, the median gestational age at EP presentation was higher (6.24 ± 1.25 vs. 5.59 ± 1.24, P<0.001), and the proportions were higher of symptomatic women (42.9% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.035) and urgent laparoscopies (42.9% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.038). In a multivariable linear model, women who presented during the pandemic were more likely to undergo an urgent laparoscopy [OR 2.30, 95%CI (1.20-4.41)], P = 0.012. In urgent surgeries performed during the pandemic compared to the earlier period, the proportion of women with a hemoglobin drop >2 gr/dL was greater (60% vs. 30%, p = 0.024). Statistically significant differences were not found in sonographic or laboratory findings, in rupture or massive hemoperitoneum rates, or in the need for blood transfusion in urgent laparoscopy. Outcomes were similar before and after introduction of vaccinations. CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, and even after the introduction of vaccination, women with EP were more likely to undergo urgent surgery, and blood loss was greater. This is likely due to delayed diagnosis.

Efficacy of a machine learning-based approach in predicting neurological prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury patients following urgent surgery within 24 h after injury.

We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting the neurological outcomes of cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). We retrospectively analyzed 135 patients with CSCI who underwent surgery within 24 h after injury. Patients were assessed with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS; grades A to E) 6 months after injury. A total of 34 features extracted from demographic variables, surgical factors, laboratory variables, neurological status, and radiological findings were analyzed. The ML model was created using Light GBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost. We evaluated Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values to determine the variables that contributed most to the prediction models. We constructed multiclass prediction models for the five AIS grades and binary classification models to predict more than one-grade improvement in AIS 6 months after injury. Of the ML models used, CatBoost showed the highest accuracy (0.800) for the prediction of AIS grade and the highest AUC (0.90) for predicting improvement in AIS. AIS grade at admission, intramedullary hemorrhage, longitudinal extent of intramedullary T2 hyperintensity, and HbA1c were identified as important features for these prediction models. The ML models successfully predicted neurological outcomes 6 months after injury following urgent surgery in patients with CSCI.

Giant aneurysm of the circumflex artery.

In this paper, we describe a rare case of a giant aneurysm of the circumflex artery that we managed. A 59-year-old female patient presented in cardiogenic shock after partial aneurysm rupture. Giant aneurysms of the circumflex artery are extremely rare entities. The optimal surgical management dictates meticulous preoperative planning and the operation should be carried out on an elective basis.

Pharmacokinetics of Phenprocoumon in Emergency Situations-Results of the Prospective Observational RADOA-Registry (Reversal Agent Use in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Vitamin K Antagonists Registry).

Background: Phenprocoumon has been used as an oral anticoagulant in patients with thromboembolic disease for more than 40 years. So far its pharmacokinetics have not been analyzed in emergency situations. Methods: Phenprocoumon-treated patients with major bleeding or urgent surgery were included in a prospective, observational registry. Phenprocoumon drug concentrations were analyzed in samples, collected as part of routine care using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Moreover, anticoagulant intensity and drug half-life (t1/2) were calculated. Results: 115 patients were included. Phenprocoumon levels declined over time with a half-life of 5.27 and 5.29 days in patients with major bleedings (n = 82) and with urgent surgery (n = 33). Baseline phenprocoumon levels were 2.2 times higher in the bleeding group compared to the surgery group (1.92 vs. 0.87 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). International normalized ratio (INR) values decreased rapidly during the first 24 h. In 27.6% of patients a rebound of INR (recurrent increase > 1.5) was observed which was associated with significantly increased bleeding rates (22% vs. 4.2% in patients with or without INR rebound, p = 0.012). Conclusions: In emergency situations, the long half-life of phenprocoumon may cause INR rebound and associated recurrent bleedings. Optimal management may need to include repeated vitamin K supplementation over days.

Postoperative nosocomial COVID-19 infection in surgical patients during pandemic: A prospective observational cohort study.

Background: increased pressure on healthcare systems and possible risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection during pandemic urged many guidelines to severely restrict the number of operations. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of COVID-19 infection and its complications in patients undergoing urgent or elective operations.Methods: a prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary surgical center and all patients with no preoperative history of COVID-19 undergoing elective or emergent surgeries were included in this investigation. chest computed tomography (CT) scan or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test were performed on patients before and after surgery. Results: 183 patients who underwent an operation were enrolled in this study. In postoperative follow-up, 12 patients were positive for COVID-19 infection as identified by RT-PCR and non-contrasted chest CT scans. Regrettably, 2 individuals passed with one of these individuals dying as a direct result of COVID-19 infection. All the 12 cases of post-operative COVID-19 patients underwent elective surgeries. Conclusion: the gathered results indicate a need for the re-evaluation of the risks of operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. If operations are performed while observing protective and preventative protocols, the risk of post-operative nosocomial COVID-19 is significantly reduced. Hence, the consequences imposed on patients by the delay or cancellation of operations (most notably in cancer cases) may outweigh the risk of post-operative COVID-19 infections.

Case report: Urgent surgical management of pediatric clear cell sarcoma of the kidney with atrial obstruction.

Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney (CCSK) is an uncommon renal neoplasm of childhood. Progression of intracaval or cavoatrial thrombosis is extremely rare and mostly asymptomatic, treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. However, in an unstable patient, acute radical surgical intervention is the treatment of choice. We present a 2-year-old girl diagnosed as having a large left kidney tumor and acute cardiac decompensation via cavoatrial thrombotic progression. Urgent radical nephrectomy and removal of tumor thrombus were performed using atriotomy and inferior vena cava (IVC) endarterectomy under cardiopulmonary bypass. Histopathology revealed CCSK. The patient is tumor-free at 9-year follow-up.

Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study. / Reintervenciones tras apendicectomía en niños. Estudio multicéntrico.

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause of acute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyze the causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgery following appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the appendectomies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 was carried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, time from one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findings at baseline appendectomy according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay were collected. RESULTS: 3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7% of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-V of the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 minutes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery, p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2 vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001). 76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes included postoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehiscence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impacted by the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044, 95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% advanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3). There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline appendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopic appendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimally invasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27 laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surgeries) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-intervention through open surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Re-intervention rate was higher in advanced appendicitis cases. In this series, the minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided drainage) was the technique of choice for re-interventions.

INTRODUCCION: La apendicitis aguda es la causa más frecuente de abdomen agudo en niños. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar las causas, abordaje y resultados de las complicaciones que requieren intervención quirúrgica después de la apendicectomía. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de las apendicectomías realizadas en 3 centros de tercer nivel entre 2015-2019. Se recogieron las complicaciones, causas y número de reintervenciones, intervalo entre ambas cirugías, técnica empleada, hallazgos operatorios según la Clasificación de la American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) en la apendicectomía inicial y tiempo de ingreso. RESULTADOS: Se intervinieron 3.698 apendicitis, un 76,7% por vía laparoscópica, encontrando un 37,2% evolucionadas (grado II-V de la clasificación AAST). El tiempo medio quirúrgico fue de 50,4 minutos (laparoscopia 49,8 ± 20,1 vs. laparotomía 49,9 ± 20,1, p > 0,05), superior en aquellos pacientes que requirieron reintervención (68,6 ± 27,2 vs. 49,1 ± 19,3, p < 0,001). Se realizaron 76 reintervenciones (2,05%). Las causas fueron: infección postoperatoria (n = 46), obstrucción intestinal (n = 20), dehiscencia (n = 4) y otras (n = 6). El abordaje inicial no influyó en el riesgo de reintervención (laparotomía o laparoscopia, OR 1,044, IC 95% 0,57-1,9), pero sí el grado de evolución de la apendicitis (7,8% evolucionadas vs. 0,7% incipientes, OR 12,52, IC 95% 6,18-25,3). Hubo una tendencia a reintervenir por el mismo abordaje que la apendicectomía, esto ocurrió en un 72,2% de las apendicectomías laparoscópicas y en un 67,7% de las apendicectomías abiertas. El abordaje mínimamente invasivo (50/76) fue más frecuente que la laparotomía (27 laparoscopias y 23 drenajes ecoguiados frente a 26 laparotomías) (p < 0,05). El 55% de los pacientes obstruidos se reintervinieron por vía abierta (p > 0,05). CONCLUSION: El índice de reintervención fue superior en las apendicitis evolucionadas. En esta serie, el abordaje mínimamente invasivo (laparoscópico o drenaje ecoguiado) fue la técnica de elección en las reintervenciones.

Effectiveness of colonic stent placement for obstructive colorectal cancers: An analysis of short-term results using a nationwide database in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC). Both SEMS and urgent surgery have several merits and demerits. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of SEMS by comparing the mortality rate after the hospitalization between SEMS and urgent surgery for OCC. METHODS: We collected OCC patients' data using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database system. We divided eligible patients into the SEMS and urgent surgery groups using propensity score matching and compared in-hospital death rates, length of hospitalization, and medical costs. We also conducted logistic regression analysis to identify clinical factors affecting in-hospital deaths. RESULTS: We enrolled 17 140 cases after propensity score matching. SEMS reduced the in-hospital death rate compared with urgent surgery (2.0% vs 3.6%, P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization was shorter in the SEMS group than in the urgent surgery group (16 vs 25 days, P < 0.0001). Medical costs were lower in the SEMS group than in the urgent surgery group (1 663 550 vs 2 424 082 JPY, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis also showed that SEMS reduced in-hospital death (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.70, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Self-expandable metallic stent placement for OCC might reduce the mortality rate in short term and shorten the length of hospitalization. These results facilitate considering SEMS with careful judgment for its indication when treating OCC patients.

Reintervenciones tras apendicectomía en niños. Estudio multicéntrico / Re-interventions following appendectomy in children: a multicenter study

Introducción: La apendicitis aguda es la causa más frecuente deabdomen agudo en niños. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar lascausas, abordaje y resultados de las complicaciones que requieren in-tervención quirúrgica después de la apendicectomía.Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de las apendicectomíasrealizadas en 3 centros de tercer nivel entre 2015-2019. Se recogieronlas complicaciones, causas y número de reintervenciones, intervalo entreambas cirugías, técnica empleada, hallazgos operatorios según la Clasi-ficación de la American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST)en la apendicectomía inicial y tiempo de ingreso.Resultados: Se intervinieron 3.698 apendicitis, un 76,7% por víalaparoscópica, encontrando un 37,2% evolucionadas (grado II-V de laclasificación AAST). El tiempo medio quirúrgico fue de 50,4 minutos(laparoscopia 49,8 ± 20,1 vs. laparotomía 49,9 ± 20,1, p > 0,05), superioren aquellos pacientes que requirieron reintervención (68,6 ± 27,2 vs.49,1 ± 19,3, p < 0,001).Se realizaron 76 reintervenciones (2,05%). Las causas fueron: infec-ción postoperatoria (n = 46), obstrucción intestinal (n = 20), dehiscencia(n = 4) y otras (n = 6). El abordaje inicial no influyó en el riesgo dereintervención (laparotomía o laparoscopia, OR 1,044, IC 95% 0,57-1,9),pero sí el grado de evolución de la apendicitis (7,8% evolucionadas vs.0,7% incipientes, OR 12,52, IC 95% 6,18-25,3).Hubo una tendencia a reintervenir por el mismo abordaje que laapendicectomía, esto ocurrió en un 72,2% de las apendicectomías lapa-roscópicas y en un 67,7% de las apendicectomías abiertas. El abordajemínimamente invasivo (50/76) fue más frecuente que la laparotomía(27 laparoscopias y 23 drenajes ecoguiados frente a 26 laparotomías)(p < 0,05). El 55% de los pacientes obstruidos se reintervinieron porvía abierta (p > 0,05).

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most frequent cause ofacute abdomen in children. The objective of this study was to analyzethe causes, approach, and results of complications requiring surgeryfollowing appendectomy.Materials and methods: A retrospective study of the appendecto-mies conducted in three third-level institutions from 2015 to 2019 wascarried out. Complications, causes, and number of re-interventions, timefrom one surgery to another, surgical technique used, operative findingsat baseline appendectomy according to the American Association forthe Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification, and hospital stay werecollected.Results: 3,698 appendicitis cases underwent surgery, 76.7%of which laparoscopically, with 37.2% being advanced (grades II-Vof the AAST classification). Mean operating time was 50.4 min-utes (49.8 ± 20.1 for laparoscopy vs. 49.9 ± 20.1 for open surgery,p > 0.05), and longer in patients requiring re-intervention (68.6 ± 27.2vs. 49.1 ± 19.3, p < 0.001).76 re-interventions (2.05%) were carried out. The causes includedpostoperative infection (n = 46), intestinal obstruction (n = 20), dehis-cence (n = 4), and others (n = 6). Re-intervention risk was not impactedby the baseline approach used (open surgery or laparoscopy, OR: 1.044,95% CI: 0.57-1.9), but it was by appendicitis progression (7.8% ad-vanced vs. 0.7% incipient, OR: 12.52, 95% CI: 6.18-25.3).There was a tendency to use the same approach both at baseline ap-pendectomy and re-intervention. This occurred in 72.2% of laparoscopicappendectomies, and in 67.7% of open appendectomies. The minimallyinvasive approach (50/76) was more frequent than the open one (27laparoscopies and 23 ultrasound-guided drainages vs. 26 open surger-ies) (p < 0.05). 55% of obstruction patients underwent re-interventionthrough open surgery (p > 0.05).

Did we do the right thing? The appropriateness of orthopedic operative interventions during the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

PURPOSE: During the coronavirus disease (COVID) pandemic elective surgeries were cancelled and operative indications curtailed to counteract shortages in resources. We aimed to review each orthopedic operative indication at an urban Level 1 Trauma Center inundated with COVID. We aimed to classify the appropriateness of each operative intervention and determine if exposure to COVID impacted morbidity or mortality. METHODS: All orthopedic procedures between March 16, 2020 and May 16, 2020 were reviewed. The most urgent surgical indication for each procedure was classified by 2 fellowship trained orthopedic trauma surgeons and 2 senior residents. The appropriateness of the operative intervention was determined. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) and American College of Surgeons (ACS) guidelines for surgery during the pandemic were considered. RESULTS: Seventy-six surgical encounters were performed on 71 inpatients including 99 total procedures. No outpatient procedures were performed. Fifty-four of 71 patients were male. There was a mean age of 51.6 years. Of 71 patients, 41 presented to the emergency department without trauma activation with a mean time to presentation of 2.7 days post injury. The most urgent surgical indications included 18 hip fractures, 18 periarticular fractures, 17 open fractures, 7 severe infections, 5 pelvic fractures, 5 femoral shaft fractures, 3 spinal injuries, 1 tibial fracture, 1 tendon injury, and 1 clavicle fracture. Four procedures could have been delayed for conservative management without causing significant harm. Upon discharge 13/71 patients had tested positive for COVID, 41/71 had remained negative throughout their hospital stay, and 17/71 patients never were tested. Four patients contracted COVID in the hospital. There were 4 in hospital deaths, 2 attributed to hypoxemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID pneumonia. CONCLUSION: It was determined that 72/76 cases were considered appropriate in following guidelines of the AAOS and ACS. This highlights the value of halting outpatient procedures and limiting patient exposure to COVID. Comprehensive patient/provider discussions addressing the risks, benefits, alternatives to surgery, and the risk of exposure to respiratory illness are vital. It behooves the surgical team to follow established guidelines such as those of the AAOS and ACS when triaging orthopedic patients for a surgical admission.