Pain and other complications of pelvic mesh: a systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis of women's accounts.

OBJECTIVES: Synthesis of the experience of women with pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal, to identify pain-related problems and to formulate psychological aspects of pain. DESIGN: Systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies of pain from pelvic or vaginal mesh, or mesh removal, in women over 18 years, using individual interviews, focus groups, free text, or written or oral contributions to formal enquiries. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase and PsycINFO, from inception to 26 April 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Qualitative studies of pain and other symptoms from pelvic or vaginal mesh or its removal; adults; no language restriction. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Line-by-line coding of participant quotations and study author statements by one author to provide codes that were applied to half the studies by another author and differences resolved by discussion. Codes were grouped into subthemes and themes by both authors, then scrutinised and discussed by a focus group of mesh-injured women for omissions, emphasis and coherence. Studies were appraised using an amalgamation of the CASP and COREQ tools. RESULTS: 2292 search results produced 9 eligible studies, with 7-752 participants, a total of around 2000. Four recruited patients, four totally or partially from mesh advocacy groups, and two were national enquiries (UK and Australia). Four major themes were as follows: broken body, broken mind; distrust of doctors and the medical industry; broken life and keeping going-a changed future. Psychological content mainly concerned the loss of trust in medical care, leaving women unsupported in facing an uncertain future. Mesh-injured women strongly endorsed the findings. CONCLUSIONS: Pain and other problems associated with pelvic mesh are profound and far-reaching for women affected. Worse, they feel subject to continued gaslighting, including denial of their mesh-related problems and dismissal of their concerns about continued mesh insertion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022330527.

Cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy versus surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised non-inferiority controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy as an initial treatment option compared with surgery for moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms in secondary care from a healthcare and a societal perspective. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with a 24-month follow-up. SETTING: 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, recruitment conducted between 2015 and 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 1605 women referred to secondary care with symptomatic prolapse stage ≥2 were requested to participate. Of them, 440 women gave informed consent and were randomised to pessary therapy (n=218) or to surgery (n=222) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Pessary therapy and surgery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), a 7-point scale dichotomised into successful versus unsuccessful, with a non-inferiority margin of -10%; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) measured by the EQ-5D-3L; healthcare and societal costs were based on medical records and the institute for Medical Technology Assessment questionnaires. RESULTS: For the PGI-I, the mean difference between pessary therapy and surgery was -0.05 (95% CI -0.14; 0.03) and -0.03 (95% CI -0.07; 0.002) for QALYs. In total, 54.1% women randomised to pessary therapy crossed over to surgery, and 3.6% underwent recurrent surgery. Healthcare and societal costs were significantly lower in the pessary therapy (mean difference=-€1807, 95% CI -€2172; -€1446 and mean difference=-€1850, 95% CI -€2349; -€1341, respectively). The probability that pessary therapy is cost-effective compared with surgery was 1 at willingness-to-pay thresholds between €0 and €20 000/QALY gained from both perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: Non-inferiority of pessary therapy regarding the PGI-I could not be shown and no statistically significant differences in QALYs between interventions were found. Due to significantly lower costs, pessary therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared with surgery as an initial treatment option for women with symptomatic POP treated in secondary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4883.

Patient characteristics, surgery outcomes, presumed aetiology and other characteristics of fistula surgeries and related procedures supported by Fistula Foundation from 2019 to 2021: a multicentre, retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric fistula is a devastating childbirth injury primarily caused by prolonged, obstructed labour. It leaves women incontinent, severely stigmatised and isolated. Fistula repair surgery can restore a woman's health and well-being. Fistula Foundation, a non-profit organisation, works in partnership with local hospitals and community organisations in Africa and Asia to address key barriers to treatment and to increase the number of women receiving surgical care. This paper presents data on fistula and fistula repair surgery across a large global network of hospitals supported by Fistula Foundation. The data were collected between 2019 and 2021. DESIGN: Multicentre, retrospective, observational, descriptive study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study analysed deidentified data from 24 568 surgical repairs supported by Fistula Foundation to treat women with obstetric fistula at 110 hospitals in 27 countries. RESULTS: The data highlight patient characteristics and key trends and outcomes from obstetric fistula repair surgeries and related procedures. Of those surgeries, 87% resulted in a successful outcome (fistula dry and closed) at the time of discharge, highlighting the effectiveness of fistula repair in restoring continence and improving quality of life. Over the period studied, the number of supported surgeries increased by 14%, but there remains an urgent need to strengthen local surgical capacity and improve access to treatment. Women suffered an average of 5.7 years before they received surgery and only 4% of women sought care independently. This underscores the importance of enhancing community awareness and strengthening referral networks. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides essential insight from a vast, global network of hospitals providing highly effective fistula repair surgery. Further investment is needed to strengthen surgical capacity, increase awareness of fistula and remove financial barriers to treatment if stakeholders are to make significant progress towards the United Nations' ambitious vision of ending fistula by 2030.

Protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study on the effects of non-surgical weight loss on pelvic floor dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have recommended non-surgical weight loss and pelvic floor muscle training as first-line treatment for obese patients with urinary incontinence. However, limited studies are detecting the effect of weight loss on other types of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs), as well as on the quality of life (QoL) and the related influencing factors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The "Weight Loss on Pelvic Floor Dysfunction"(WLPFD) observational study is a 6 months prospective, longitudinal real-world cohort study aiming to recruit 200 patients. Participants will be followed up three times during the study: at baseline, and at 2 and 6 months. The methodology involves recruitment and follow-up of participants, data collection through validated questionnaires, and statistical analysis to assess the impact of non-surgical weight loss on PFD and QoL. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been reviewed and given a favourable ethical opinion by the Peking Union Medical College Hospital ethics committee (K4278). All results from the study will be submitted to international journals and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05987085.

The unmet needs in vaginal pessaries.

A pessary is a medical device that is inserted into the vagina to provide structural support to one or more of the descending vaginal compartments in women with pelvic organ prolapse. It is a common management option offered to women in the short and long term. This article will discuss the current use of vaginal pessaries for POP, the current challenges with their use and common complications seen in practise. It will also discuss the unmet needs in the current products available on the market and suggest ideas for product design, materials and considerations for future development.

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION:  This study aimed to determine the extent of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and the relationship between LUTS and patients' clinical and functional factors. METHODS: Patients aged 40 to 80 who were admitted with CLBP were included. Demographic data and the duration of CLBP and LUTS were noted. Anteroposterior and lateral lumbar radiographs and lumbar MRI findings were recorded. Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used for functional status assessment. For the LUTS evaluation, patients were asked to tick the symptoms from the list of LUTS prepared. RESULTS: We included 90 patients with CLBP. The frequency of urinary incontinence was 81.1%. The mean number of LUTS was 2.81±3.22. The LUTS rates were higher in patients with vertebral height loss (p = 0.03), with central (p = 0.02) and lateral spinal narrow canals (p = 0.03), and with facet hypertrophy (p = 0.04). The rates of LUTS were lower in patients with decreased lumbar lordosis (p = 0.02). The ODI and LUTS were found to be related (p = 0.01). The role limitations due to physical problems of the SF-36 subgroups and LUTS were significantly correlated (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The incidence of the coexistence of CLBP and LUTS is high. Patients cannot match and report LUTS among their complaints, so physicians should inquire about LUTS in patients with CLBP and carry out the appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

Investigating mortality and morbidity associated with UrINary incontinence during Older Womens Secondary Care Admissions and exploring nurses experiences of delivering related care (U-INconti): a mixed methods research protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence (UI) is associated with increasing age and is more frequently experienced by women. Despite 40% prevalence in the community, little is known about the prevalence/incidence of UI in older women during hospital admission. UI during hospital admissions, within this group, has also been under-researched in terms of its relationship to specific clinical conditions and mortality rates. Given that UI has serious implications for both patient care and women's general health and well-being on discharge, this protocol describes a planned research project which aims to determine mortality, morbidity, prevalence and incidence of UI in older women (≥55 years) during hospital admission to inform nursing practice. Additionally, it aims to explore the experience of nurses who deliver women's care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an explanatory mixed-methods study consisting of two phases: (1) retrospecitive analysis of electronic patient care records (EPCR) to determine prevalence/incidence of UI, clinical conditions most likely associated with UI and any associations between UI and death, (2) nurse interviews to explore views, knowledge and perceptions of performing the nursing assessment and providing care for older women (≥55 years) with UI during admission. EPCR will be gained from a National Health Service (NHS) teaching hospital. Nurse interviews will be conducted with nurses from an alternative but similar-sized NHS hospital. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is provided by the University of Salford Ethics Committee and regulatory approval by the NHS Health Research Authority (Integrated Research Application System project ID: 303118). Local NHS trust approval to access electronic care records for the purposes of analysis of anonymised data has been provided by one of the two collaborating NHS hospitals. Findings will be disseminated through open-access geriatric or urogynaecology journals and presented to relevant stakeholders at local, national and international meetings including scientific meetings such as the UK Continence Society and International Continence Society.

Exploring the experiences of people with urogynaecology conditions in the UK: a reflexive thematic analysis and conceptual model.

BACKGROUND: Urogynaecological conditions, such as pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and urinary tract infection, can have a profound impact on people's lives. The Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review highlights missed opportunities to prevent harm when patient voices are not incorporated into healthcare policy and practice. This resonates with the Women's Health Strategy for England. The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme funded this in-depth qualitative exploration of people's experiences of living with urogynaecological conditions, and of seeking healthcare treatment, to inform health and social care improvements in the UK. METHODS: We conducted in-depth interviews online or by telephone (April 2021-December 2021) and used reflexive thematic analysis to develop themes that cut across urogynaecological conditions. RESULTS: We spoke to seventy-four adults aged 22-84 across a range of backgrounds and lived experiences of urogynaecological conditions, including pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and persistent or recurring urinary tract infection. Eight themes were developed: [1] I get no respite from my own body; [2] I feel confined and separated; [3] I can no longer be 'me'; [4] I am constrained by stigma, shame and silence; [5] I feel fragmented and lost in the healthcare system; [6] I need to be heard, believed, and valued; [7] I need respect as an equal partner in healthcare; and [8] (Re)connected to a more open community. CONCLUSIONS: High quality care focuses on the whole person rather than their body parts. Openness and candour support a shared decision-making model of care. A culture of shame can have a negative impact on access to health care and recovery.

Pelvic floor imaging in asymptomatic subjects.

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the range of normal imaging features during total pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFUS) (transperineal, transvaginal, endovaginal and endoanal) and defaecation MRI (dMRI). METHOD: Twenty asymptomatic female volunteers (mean age 36.5 years) were prospectively investigated with dMRI and TPFUS. Subjects were screened with symptom questionnaires (ICIQ-B, St Mark's faecal incontinence score, obstructed defaecation syndrome score, ICIQ-V, BSAQ). dMRI and TPFUS were performed and interpreted by blinded clinicians according to previously published methods. RESULTS: The subjects comprised six parous and 14 nulliparous women, of whom three were postmenopausal. There were three with a rectocoele on both modalities and one with a rectocoele on dMRI only. There was one with intussusception on TPFUS. Two had an enterocoele on both modalities and one on TPFUS only. There were six with a cystocoele on both modalities, one on dMRI only and one on TPFUS only. On dMRI, there were 12 with functional features. Four also displayed functional features on TPFUS. Two displayed functional features on TPFUS only. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the presence of abnormal findings on dMRI and TPFUS without symptoms. There was a high rate of functional features on dMRI. This series is not large enough to redefine normal parameters but is helpful for appreciating the wide range of findings seen in health.

Surgical and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Robotic-Assisted (da Vinci) Laparoscopic Repair of Vesicovaginal Fistula: A Case Report and Video Demonstration.

This report presents the case of a 63-year-old woman who developed a vesicovaginal fistula as a complication of a previous total hysterectomy. The fistula was treated with the use of the da Vinci X surgical system by a multi-disciplinary operating team, including senior Robotic Urological and Gynecological Surgeons at St. Luke's Hospital in Thessaloniki, Greece. The patient was monitored up to 12 months post-op at the time of writing and she was asked to evaluate post-op quality of life using the SF-36 and ICIQ-SF-UI questionnaires. The robotic surgical procedure was completed successfully. The total operation duration was 105 minutes, without any intra-operative complications. The patient was hospitalized for two days and made a swift, uneventful recovery. Regarding the quality of life, the patient reported satisfactory improvement in almost every domain assessed compared to her pre-op assessment; an improvement that was maintained throughout the reported follow-up period. At the time of writing, the patient reports no long-term complications and satisfactory urinary continence. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair is an effective and safe treatment option for this rare complication, as indicated by both post-operative data and the patient's own self-evaluation in this report. Further research is warranted, focusing on refining the surgical technique and comparing this to other alternative methods aiming to further improve patient outcomes.

Efficacy of botulinum toxin A injection in pelvic floor muscles in chronic pelvic pain patients: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common multifactorial condition affecting 6%-27% of women aged 18-50 years worldwide. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to investigate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection compared with placebo injections in the pelvic floor muscles in women with CPP to improve pain, function and quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a study protocol for a multicentre, double-blinded placebo controlled RCT conducted in five gynaecology departments across the Netherlands. A total of 94 women over 16 years, with at least 6 months of CPP without anatomical cause and pelvic floor hypertonicity refractory to first-line pelvic floor physical therapy will be included. Participants will be randomised equally to BTA or placebo, both following physical therapy and (re-)education on the pelvic floor at 4, 8, 12 and 26 weeks after intervention. Multiple validated questionnaires focusing on pain, quality of life and sexual function will be collected at baseline and during all follow-up visits. Statistical analysis includes mixed models for repeated measurements. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval (NL61409.091.17) was obtained from Radboud University Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) and Central Committee on Research involving human Subjects (CCMO). The findings will be presented through international conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number (2017-001296-23), CCMO/METC number: NL61409.091.17.

Exploring support, experiences and needs of older women and health professionals to inform a self-management package for urinary incontinence: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Many women attempt to manage urinary incontinence (UI) independently with variable success while health professionals may be unaware of their needs. This study aimed to (1) understand older women's experiences of UI, their self-management strategies and support needs; (2) explore health professionals' experiences of supporting women and providing relevant services and (3) combine their experiences contribute to development of a theory-based and evidence-based self-management package for UI. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 older women with UI and 11 specialist health professionals. Data were analysed independently using the framework approach, then synthesised in a triangulation matrix to identify implications for content and delivery of the self-management package. SETTING: Community centres, community continence clinic and urogynaecology centre of a local teaching hospital in northern England. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 55 years and over who self-reported symptoms of UI and health professionals delivering UI services. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged. Older women see UI as a 'fact of life' but many struggle with it: women typically considered UI as part of ageing yet expressed annoyance, distress, embarrassment and had made significant lifestyle changes. Access to information and limited high-quality professional support: health professionals provided specialist UI care and information. Yet less than half of women accessed specialist services, those who had, highly valued these services. 'Trial and error' with different self-management strategies: women had tried or were using different strategies (continence pads, pelvic floor exercises, bladder management and training, fluid management and medication), with mixed success. Health professionals provided evidence-based, personalised support and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings informed the content of the self-management package that focused on providing facts, acknowledging challenges of living with/self-managing UI, sharing others' experiences, using motivational strategies and self-management tools. Delivery preferences were independent use by women or working through the package with a health professional.

Measurement of extraction forces of non-absorbable suture and different anchoring systems used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery using soft-embalmed cadavers: A feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: Success of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) mesh procedures also depends on reliable anchoring systems (AS). Our primary aim was to assess the use of soft-embalmed cadavers in testing of different AS and our secondary aim was to compare extraction forces (EF) of different AS and non-absorbable suture (NAS). STUDY DESIGN: IRB approval was obtained. NAS (Ti-cron®) and different AS were attached to force-measuring instrument (Dynamometer SS25LA) and anchored to anterior longitudinal (ALL) and pectineal ligament (PL) (Protack®, Uplift®, NAS), and sacrospinous ligament (SSL) (Surelift®, Elevate PC®, NAS) of Thiel soft-embalmed cadavers. EF were measured 2-4 times in each cadaver. Data were compared using non-parametric tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Three female cadavers (age 59, 77 and 87) were used. NAS EF were significantly higher than AS EF for ALL and SSL, but not PL. Thiel soft-embalmed cadavers proved to be useful in testing of different AS. CONCLUSIONS: Use of soft-embalmed cadavers in testing of different AS is feasible. According to our results, the NAS provides most reliable intra-corporeal fixation. However, significant inter- and intra-subject variability indicates that results may also be dependent on the tissue properties and anchoring procedure. Further testing using soft-embalmed cadavers could help optimise mesh procedures and establish a threshold EF necessary for reliable fixation.

A specialist service evaluation: a cross-sectional survey approach.

This article presents the findings of a service evaluation of a specialist urogynaecology service and highlights the implications for nursing practice. AIMS: To evaluate the overall patient experience and the degree to which individual needs were being met, and make improvements to service delivery. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey questionnaire was sent to a random sample of women (n=350) who were registered on the electronic patient record system from January to June 2020. Two items on the questionnaire related specifically to communication with patients during the first COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020. Routine service data were collected and included in descriptive statistical analysis. Qualitative themes were thematically analysed. RESULTS: The response rate was 39% (n=137). More than 90% of respondents felt listened to during consultations with nursing and medical personnel, and had trust and confidence in their clinical expertise, felt involved with decisions about care and felt comfortable with intimate examinations. Negative responses related to poor communication with administration and rescheduling appointments. CONCLUSION: Findings resulted in a departmental review of admin processes, which resulted in improvements to administrative systems, staff training, communication and information giving, and directly benefited patients.

Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 supplementation for male infertility with high sperm DNA fragmentation index: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Infertility is a focal issue in public health and affects human reproduction and survival. Notably, an increasing number of studies in recent decades have found that sperm DNA integrity plays a critical role in the development of healthy embryos. Among the multiple pathogenic factors of sperm DNA fragmentation, oxidative stress has proven to be predominant. Coenzyme Q10 supplementation, which has been used for the treatment of male infertility, has shown good clinical efficacy due to its oxidation resistance, but its efficacy as measured by the sperm DNA fragmentation index remains controversial. To address this issue, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of coenzyme Q10 for male infertility patients with a high sperm DNA fragmentation index. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Studies and Web of Science databases will be comprehensively searched from inception to 31 December 2022 to identify relevant studies published in the English language using appropriate search strategies. The search terms will be derived from the following concepts: sperm DNA fragmentation, coenzyme Q10 and randomised controlled trials. Two review stages, that is, title and abstract screening and full-text screening, will be performed by two reviewers. The risk of bias, publication bias and evidence grade of the included studies will be assessed using a standardised protocol. Data will be used to calculate effect sizes. Heterogeneity among the studies will be evaluated graphically. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed if necessary to validate the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be needed, as there will be no participants in this study. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to disseminate the findings through publication and conference presentation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022293340.

What women want now!

IMPORTANCE: Stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse are common conditions affecting women with many different conservative and surgical treatment options available for women. OBJECTIVES: Our primary aim was to determine patient views and preferences surrounding theoretical potential future treatment options for pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD): pelvic organ prolapse/SUI and determine what level of success patients would find acceptable and see if their choice was dependent on severity of their symptoms. All patients had either just completed or were about to start a course of 3 months physiotherapy. All patients with overactive bladder symptoms were excluded. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an service evaluation study of 100 consecutive women attending our urogynaecology clinic. Patients attending clinic completed a questionnaire. They were asked to choose a preferred treatment between "Option A": A surgical procedure which had an 80% success rate in curing symptoms but would require 1-2 day hospital stay and carry a small risk of complications. Or "Option B": A hypothetical course of outpatient, non-surgical treatments which would have a variable chance of improving (but not curing) symptoms (ranging from 70%, 50% or 25% chance of improvement) but would require no "down-time" and have no long term safety issues. RESULTS: Our results showed 100% of women with severe PFD would chose a surgical procedure. However those with mild/moderate symptoms would prefer a non-surgical treatment (if one were available) which may only improve their symptoms but had no long-term complications. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.46) between severity of symptoms and chance of success. CONCLUSIONS: This study is important as it highlights a change in patient demand from one of highest efficacy to possibly one with the greatest safety profile and quickest recovery time. Newer treatment technologies such as energy-based devices (radiofrequency, laser and magnetic therapy) have shown to have lower success rates but may be favourable for some women. This supports the need for further research in these areas.

Associations between lumbar bone mineral density, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and history of kidney stones in adults aged 30-69 years in the USA (NHANES 2011-2018).

OBJECTIVES: Most kidney stones contain calcium, which is closely associated with human bone health. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between the history of kidney stones and human bone health. This study examined the associations between lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) and a history of kidney stones in individuals aged between 30 years and 69 years. DESIGN AND DATA ANALYSIS: A multivariate logistic regression model was used to estimate the relationship between lumbar BMD, serum 25-OHD levels and kidney stones in this cross-sectional study. All models incorporated survey sample weights and were adjusted for covariates. SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018. The exposure and outcomes of this study included the lumbar BMD and presence of kidney stones. PARTICIPANTS: All the 7500 participants for this cross-sectional survey were selected from the NHANES between 2011 and 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome of this study was the presence of kidney stones. The interviewers asked the questions on kidney stones while the respondents were at home, using a computer-assisted personal interview system. RESULTS: Lumbar BMD was negatively correlated with a history of kidney stones in all three multivariate linear regression models; the negative association existed in all genders after adjusting for all confounding factors. In the multiple regression analysis, there was an interaction between serum 25-OHD and lumbar BMD (p<0.05) regarding the influence on kidney stones; the negative association between lumbar BMD and kidney stones was more obvious in the higher 25-OHD group (≥50 nmol/L). CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that maintaining a high lumbar BMD may reduce the incidence of kidney stone formation. Simultaneously, maintaining a high serum 25-OHD level may be more beneficial in preventing the occurrence or recurrence of stones while ensuring a high lumbar BMD.

From Clinical Scenarios to the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Children: A Focus for the General Pediatrician.

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a relevant problem in the pediatric population, having a very high prevalence. Diurnal incontinence and nocturnal enuresis are surely the most frequent symptoms, presenting, respectively, in up to 30% of school-age children and up to 10% of children between 6 and 7 years. Stypsis is the most common comorbidity, and it must be considered in the management of LUTS; indeed, the treatment of constipation is curative in most cases for both incontinence and enuresis. The presence or absence of diurnal symptoms in nocturnal enuresis and urgency in diurnal incontinence helps in the differential diagnosis. Urotherapy is always the first-line treatment, while oxybutynin and desmopressin (where appropriate) may help if the first-line treatment is unsuccessful. It is essential to identify conditions that are potentially dangerous for kidney and urinary tract well-being, for which LUTS can be the first manifestation. Starting from a series of clinical scenarios, we will underline the diagnostic clues behind LUTS in children and we will summarize clinical and surgical approaches for the proper management of these conditions.

Efficacy of supervised pelvic floor muscle training with a home-based biofeedback device for urinary incontinence in postpartum women: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Supervised pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) of at least 3 months duration has been strongly recommended as a first-line treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or SUI-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), including elderly and postnatal women. However, for the treatment of SUI and MUI in postpartum women, it is currently uncertain whether supervised PFMT combined with a biofeedback device is superior to PFMT alone. Despite some supportive results, more reliable evidence is lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is designed as a multicentre assessor-blinded parallel-group randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of PFMT with a home-based pressure-mediated biofeedback device (intervention group) and that of at-home PFMT alone (control group) for women with new-onset SUI or SUI-predominant MUI after delivery. Five hundred eligible women from the obstetric outpatient clinics of five tertiary hospitals will be randomly allocated (1:1) and evaluated with repeated questionnaires, physical examinations and pelvic floor assessments at baseline (pretest), 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (postintervention) during the study period. Both groups will be instructed to follow the same training protocol under 3-month supervision after randomisation. The use of a biofeedback device with a self-assessment function will be added to the PFMT regime for patients in the intervention group. The primary outcome is the self-reported severity of urinary incontinence assessed through the short form of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. Secondary outcomes include pelvic muscle support and strength, symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, quality of life, sexual function, self-efficacy and adherence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been received from the Peking Union Medical College Hospital ethics committee (JS-3192D). All results from the study will be submitted to international journals and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05115864.

The experience of women reporting damage from vaginal mesh: a reflexive thematic analysis.

Background: The UK's 'First do no harm' report highlighted missed opportunities to prevent harm and emphasised the need to incorporate patient voices into healthcare. Due to concerns about, and the subsequent suspension, of vaginal mesh for urinary incontinence thousands of women face the decision about mesh removal surgery. The aim of this study was to explore and understand the experience of living with complications attributed to vaginal mesh surgery so that this knowledge can contribute to improvements in care for those considering mesh, or mesh removal, surgery. Methods: This study was embedded in the 'PURSUE' study which explored the experiences of 74 people with urogynaecological conditions in the UK (30th April 2021-17th December 2021). Of these 74 people, fifteen women reported complications that they attributed to vaginal mesh surgery. We used the six stages of reflexive thematic analysis to conceptualise these fifteen accounts. Findings: Our conceptual model anchors eight themes around two dualities: (1) body parts versus body whole, (2) dominant discourse versus marginal discourse. Our themes indicate that trust can be established through: (1) embodied healthcare that focuses on connecting with patients' lived experience, (2) dialectic communication that recognises patient experiences and remains open to alternative perspectives. Interpretation: This study raises some important issues for education and practice. Our findings can translate to other health settings where treatments aimed to provide care have caused harm. Funding: NIHR Policy Research Programme (NIHR202450).