Descriptive cross-sectional study to evaluate perception, attitude, and practice of parents regarding COVID-19 vaccination in children 10-12 years of age-A step toward prevention of future COVID-19 outbreaks in India.

Purpose: COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic and all age groups were equally affected. Coronavirus had devastating effects worldwide due to the emergence of new variants till vaccination was adopted to eradicate the transmission of the virus and restore normalcy. However, children were not included in the initial phase of vaccination. The purpose of the study was to assess the level of perception, attitude, and practice among parents toward the COVID-19 vaccination drive in children 10-12 years of age. Design and Study: The present research is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey including parents of children aged 10-12 years as participants. The survey was conducted between May 2022 and July 2022 with a sample size of 320. Results: A high willingness (80%) among parents was found for getting their children vaccinated. COVID-19 vaccines were perceived to be safe by the parents (59%) and efficacious (75%) for their children. Parents (67%) felt that the benefits of getting their children vaccinated against COVID-19 prevail over the risks of the vaccine. Parents 214 (67%) feel the need of getting their child vaccinated for sending them to school followed by availing of daycare facilities after school 54 (17%) among working parents. A significant association (P < 0.05) was seen between the variables of practice being followed by parents and their children as per COVID-19 norms. Parent's negative attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination was associated with availability of no/unclear safety information (36%), fear of adverse effects of vaccine (3%), and false belief of having long-term immunity due to natural infection (32%). The positive attitude of parents was due to trust in positive information/news about the vaccine (42%), belief in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine (5%), acceptability for mild adverse effects (1%), and the necessity of vaccine to send children to schools (1%). Conclusion and Recommendations: The awareness of parents regarding COVID-19 vaccination for children was limited, high level of acceptance for vaccination was seen in our study. We recommend to continuing educational programs through mass campaigns to increase increasing awareness among parents for getting COVID-19 vaccination for their children. Vaccine hesitancy including vaccine safety concerns of parents should be addressed by presenting myths and facts related to COVID-19 vaccine using television, radio, and social media platforms.

"You can push these conversations, but don't push your patient away": healthcare learner perspectives on virtual simulation games as an educational approach to address vaccine hesitancy.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a significant threat to public health. Healthcare providers (HCPs) can address hesitancy during routine patient conversations; however, few multidisciplinary education tools exist for HCPs to learn to engage in vaccine discussion especially considering new vaccine technologies such as mRNA vaccines. The objectives of this study were to explore HCP learners' experiences with COVID-19 vaccine communication, and qualitatively evaluate an online learning module composed of virtual simulation games (VSGs) which utilize the PrOTCT Framework for HCP vaccine communication. Methods: Three virtual focus groups were conducted from December 2022 to January 2023 with Canadian healthcare learners in nursing (N = 6), pharmacy (N = 9), and medicine (N = 7) who participated in a larger study measuring the effectiveness of the VSGs. Using a pragmatic approach, a qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo to identify themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 22 HCP learners participated in this study and three key themes were identified. Across all three disciplines, participants expressed that (1) their prior education lacked training on how to hold vaccine conversations, resulting in uncomfortable personal experiences with patients; (2) the VSGs increased their confidence in holding vaccine conversations by providing novel tools and skills; and (3) participants also provided feedback to improve the VSGs which was implemented and supported the dissemination to all HCP professions. Conclusion: Although HCPs are a trusted source of vaccine information, participants in this study felt they received little training on how to engage in challenging conversations regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The introduction of the PrOTCT Framework and presumptive statements provided novel strategies for HCP to initiate vaccine conversations, especially considering new vaccine technologies and participants appreciated the emphasis on coping strategies and resilience. It is essential that HCP are provided both opportunities to practice managing these conversations, and tools and skills to succeed at an early point in their careers to prepare them for future roles in vaccine advocacy, delivery, and promotion.

Racial (In)Equity in South Los Angeles-Community Centered Experiences with COVID-19 Syndemics.

Objectives: To analyze community experiences involving COVID-19 vaccination access and equity in Black and Latina/o/x communities within South Los Angeles, using a socioecological framework. Methods: We conducted four virtual focus groups (n = 33 total participants) in 2021, with Black and Latina/o/x community members, community leaders, and community-based providers in South Los Angeles, a region highly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We used a grounded theory approach to guide the analysis and generate data shaped by participant perspectives. Results: Participants across groups consistently emphasized medical mistrust, fear/skepticism, misinformation, accessibility, and feelings of pressure and blame as factors influencing COVID-19 vaccination decisions. The need to address pandemic-related socioeconomic hardships in underresourced communities was equally highlighted. Conclusions: Findings show that building trust, providing tailored information, and continued investment into diversity and equity initiatives can support Black and Latino/a/x communities in making informed health decisions. Community-centered support services should address the economic, social, and structural impact of the pandemic on vulnerable communities. Furthermore, public health and policy efforts must prioritize funding to equip social and health care systems with infrastructure investment in racial and ethnic minority communities.

The negative impact of misinformation and vaccine conspiracy on COVID-19 vaccine uptake and attitudes among the general public in Iraq.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a major barrier to infectious disease control. Previous studies showed high rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Middle East. The current study aimed to investigate the attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 vaccine uptake among adult population in Iraq. Methods: This self-administered survey-based study was conducted in August-September 2022. The survey instrument assessed participants' demographics, attitudes to COVID-19 vaccination, beliefs in COVID-19 misinformation, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, and sources of information regarding the vaccine. Results: The study sample comprised a total of 2544 individuals, with the majority reporting the uptake of at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination (n = 2226, 87.5 %). Positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination were expressed by the majority of participants (n = 1966, 77.3 %), while neutral and negative attitudes were expressed by 345 (13.6 %) and 233 (9.2 %) participants, respectively. Factors associated with positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in multivariate analysis included disbelief in COVID-19 misinformation and disagreement with vaccine conspiracies. Higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake was significantly associated with previous history of COVID-19 infection, higher income, residence outside the Capital, disbelief in COVID-19 misinformation, disagreement with vaccine conspiracies, and reliance on reputable information sources. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine coverage was high among the participants, with a majority having positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. Disbelief in COVID-19 misinformation and disagreement with vaccine conspiracies were correlated with positive vaccine attitudes and higher vaccine uptake. These insights can inform targeted interventions to enhance vaccination campaigns.

Acceptance and Hesitancy Towards Covid-19 Vaccination Among Dialysis Patients in a Dialysis Center in Khartoum in 2022.

Background: COVID-19, a highly infectious virus, poses significant risks, particularly for immuno-compromised individuals. Vaccination remains a key preventive measure, yet acceptance rates vary among populations globally. Objective: This study aims to assess COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among dialysis patients atDr. Salma Center for Dialysis in 2022, highlighting the primary reasons for hesitancy within this vulnerable group. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Dr. Salma Center in Khartoum, Sudan, in 2022. A systematic random sampling method was employed to select participants, who were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Results: Of a sample of 137 patients, 125 completed the questionnaire with 91.2% response rate. Approximately half of the respondents reported vaccine hesitancy 50%, with 77% acknowledging the severity of COVID-19 but only 53% advised vaccination among their peers. Primary concerns included vaccine side effects 24.8% and mistrust of production companies 10.4%. No significant associations were found between vaccine hesitancy and demographic factors. Conclusion: The study reveals a notable prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among dialysis patients at Dr. Salma Center in Khartoum, 2022. Addressing this hesitancy requires concerted efforts to bridge the trust gap between patients and healthcare systems, coupled with targeted awareness campaigns to correct misinformation and reinforce confidence in vaccines.

A Dialogue about Vaccine Side Effects: Understanding Difficult Pandemic Experiences.

This paper investigates the relationship between the experiences of mass vaccinations against two pandemic viruses: the swine flu in 2009-2010 and COVID-19 in the early 2020s. We show how distressing memories from the swine flu vaccination, which led to the rare but severe adverse effect of narcolepsy in approximately 500 children in Sweden, were triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. The narcolepsy illness story has rarely been told in academic contexts; therefore, we will provide space for this story. It is presented through a dialogue with the aim of shedding light on the interrelationship between pandemics-and between mass vaccinations-to investigate what could be termed cultural wounds that influence societies because they are characterized by the difficulty of talking about them. The paper explores the multiple shocks of illness in life and what can be learned from them by sharing them.

Countering vaccine misinformation: Designing a learning resource for healthcare workers in eight countries.

In response to the pervasive challenges posed by online health misinformation, our objective was to develop a training program aimed at enhancing the skills and confidence of healthcare workers in recognizing and effectively responding to misinformation, with a particular focus on vaccinations. This article discusses the design of a training program aimed at equipping healthcare workers with the skills to combat health misinformation, offering theoretical foundations for integrating evidence-based strategies into problem-based learning to help learners retain and apply information, and also shares examples and insights gained from its application across diverse learner groups. The training curriculum integrates evidence-based misinformation intervention strategies, learner engagement strategies and draws from authentic scenarios across diverse cultural contexts. The trainings were administered from January through July 2023 to 287 participants across eight countries (Cameroon, Guyana, India, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, Philippines, and the United States) in English, French, Spanish, and Portuguese. Throughout the implementation of the training, a key emphasis was placed on a learner-driven approach that fostered real-world application. Participants engaged in role-playing exercises and problem-solving sessions, enabling them to practice their newfound skills in a controlled setting. Our findings contribute to the literature of participatory, problem-based learning for healthcare professionals and vaccine communication and misinformation response, and can serve as a resource for practitioners implementing similar trainings.

COVID-19 ethics: unique aspects and a review as of early 2024.

COVID-19 presents a variety of ethical challenges in a set of arenas, arenas not always considered in past pandemics. These challenges include issues related to autonomy, distributive ethics, and the establishment of policies of equity and justice. Methods are a literature review based on regular editing of an online textbook during the COVID-19 outbreak and a literature review using key ethical terms. Patients are confronted with new issues related to autonomy. Providers need to expand their concepts of ethical issues to include decisions based on proportionality and public health ethics. The public health sector needs to assess the beneficence of alternative modes of disease control. The research community needs to redefine the concept of informed consent in emergent conditions. All elements of the medical spectrum-physicians, scientists, and the community-at-large including the pharmaceutical industry-need to consider the multifaceted methods for preventing future pandemics. This will require giving particular emphasis to public health funding and ending the documented discrimination that exists in the provision of proven therapies. The developing world is especially at risk for most of the ethical issues, especially those related to equity and justice. The ethical issues associated with the COVID-19 outbreak are not unique but provide a diverse set of issues that apply to patients, providers, social groups, and investigators. The further study of such issues can help with preventing future outbreaks.

Recent increase in infant pertussis cases in Europe and the critical importance of antenatal immunisations: we must do better now.

Recent months have seen an increase in pertussis cases in several countries across the Northern and Southern hemispheres. The lack of immune stimulation during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the reduced circulation of Bordetella pertussis, the pathogen responsible for pertussis, is likely to have led to increased population susceptibility which has been magnified the typical 3-5 yearly cyclical peaks in activity. Maternal immunization for pertussis proves highly effective in protecting infants under three months of age. It's also critical for immunisers and parents to maintain high and timely immunisation uptake to ensure infants receive maximum early protection when they are most at risk of severe disease.

Predicting COVID-19 vaccine uptake: Comparing the health belief model and theory of planned behavior.

The COVID-19 outbreak has had a significant impact on the global health landscape, underscoring the crucial role that vaccinations play in achieving herd immunity and reducing the effects of pandemics. Given the importance of this issue, it is imperative to gain a deeper understanding of the various factors that influence individuals' decisions to seek vaccination. This study aimed to compare the prediction level of the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and a combined model in explaining the intention of adults to receive COVID-19 immunization. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among adults (n = 505) in Saudi Arabia. The survey contained variables related to the HBM and TPB. The prediction level of the two models as well as a combined model were evaluated utilizing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Among the recruited 505 participants, 88% fell within the 18 to 30 age range, and 54.5% were male. The proposed HBM model accounted for 68% of the variation in intention, whereas the TPB model explained 78.2% of the variation in COVID-19 vaccination intention. The combined model showed greater explanatory power (82%). The variables of susceptibility (ß = 0.20, p < .001), severity (ß = 0.49, p < .001), advantages (ß = 0.63, p < .001), and obstacles (ß = - 0.24, p < .001), perceptions of behavioral control (ß = 1.58, p < .001) and attitudes (ß = 0.44, p < .001) were found to significantly predict increased vaccination intentions in the combined model. However, the subjective norm construct did not significantly predict vaccination intentions (ß = 0.06, p = .34). The TPB has greater explanatory power than the HBM in predicting the intention to obtain COVID-19 vaccination. However, the combined model showed a greater prediction level. Understanding and identifying people's perceived health beliefs and practices is critical for developing successful COVID-19 intervention methods.

Challenges and Implications for Substance Use and Mental Healthcare Among Under-Resourced Women in the COVID-19 Era.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated disparities in mental healthcare and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment access, especially in under-resourced communities. This study aimed to comprehend the experiences of under-resourced women with SUD during the pandemic, their knowledge and attitudes toward it, and its impact on substance use and treatment access. METHODS: A cross-sectional study included 66 under-resourced women receiving medically managed withdrawal treatment at a community residential SUD center. Data collection occurred between November 2021 and August 2022, utilizing a 75-item instrument covering COVID-19 exposure and its impact on health, substance use, treatment access, vaccination status, beliefs, and knowledge. Descriptive analyses summarized the data. RESULTS: Participants faced various challenges during the pandemic. Many reported increased substance use, especially alcohol, opioids, benzodiazepines, and nicotine. Mental health stability was negatively affected, exacerbating existing disorders and limiting mental healthcare access. A majority (56.1%) reported that their chronic mental health disorder was less stable during the pandemic. Twenty (30.3%) participants reported that they had been diagnosed with a new mental health disorder since the pandemic, and 28.8% reported that it was harder for them to access mental healthcare during the pandemic. Job loss, housing instability, and financial strain were prevalent. Half (n=33, 50%) received a COVID-19 vaccine dose, while 27.3% (n=18) declined vaccination due to knowledge gaps and religious beliefs. The majority (n=41, 62.1%) worried about securing basic needs such as groceries and medication, with 64.6% (n=42) expressing a desire to cope using alcohol or drugs. CONCLUSIONS: This study expands upon previous research by examining the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the context of substance use disorder treatment. Unlike previous data, which focused solely on substance use behaviors, our study delves into the impact of the pandemic on co-occurring mental health disorders. Findings underscore the need for gender-responsive and culturally appropriate SUD treatment. Vaccine hesitancy, as reflected in the study, necessitates more effective, tailored evidence-based informational campaigns. Efforts must focus on enhancing mental healthcare access, reducing stigma, and supporting individuals with co-occurring conditions amidst this evolving COVID-19 health crisis.

The relationship between individuals' knowledge of human papillomavirus, attitudes towards HPV vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional study.

There are more than 207 types of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), most of which do not cause symptoms, lesions, or warts, and cause more than 600,000 cases of cancer annually. Purpose:This study was planned to elucidate the relationship between individuals' HPV knowledge, attitudes towards the HPV vaccine, and vaccine hesitancy. The research was conducted with 1011 people using a descriptive and correlational research design. Data collection tools included socio-demographic information survey, HPV Knowledge Scale, Carolina HPV Vaccination Attitudes Scale, and Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. The data was analyzed using the SPSS 26.0 package program. The average score was 11.68±7.23 on the HPV Knowledge Scale, 30.76±7.31 on the HPV Vaccine Attitude Scale, and 27.90±11.10 on the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale. While there was a very weak negative relationship between the participants HPV knowledge and HPV Vaccine Attitude scores, a weak positive relationship was found with vaccine hesitancy. A weak positive relationship was also detected between vaccine attitude and vaccine hesitancy (p<0.05). According to the regression model created in the study, HPV vaccination attitude was explained by the HPV Knowledge Scale and vaccine hesitancy at a rate of 22.5%. In line with the results, healthcare professionals need to raise awareness in the society and increase vaccination rates.

Il existe plus de 207 types de papillomavirus humain (HPV), dont la plupart ne causent pas de symptômes, de lésions ou de verrues, mais entraînent plus de 600 000 cas de cancer chaque année. Objectif : Cette étude a été planifiée pour élucider la relation entre les connaissances des individus sur le HPV, leurs attitudes envers le vaccin contre le HPV et l'hésitation vaccinale. La recherche a été menée auprès de 1011 personnes en utilisant un plan de recherche descriptif et corrélationnel. Les outils de collecte de données comprenaient un sondage d'informations sociodémographiques, l'Échelle de Connaissances sur le HPV, l'Échelle des Attitudes envers la Vaccination contre le HPV de la Caroline et l'Échelle d'Hésitation Vaccinale. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide du programme SPSS 26.0. Le score moyen était de 11,68 ± 7,23 à l'Échelle de Connaissances sur le HPV, de 30,76 ± 7,31 à l'Échelle des Attitudes envers la Vaccination contre le HPV, et de 27,90 ± 11,10 à l'Échelle d'Hésitation Vaccinale. Bien qu'il y ait eu une très faible relation négative entre les connaissances des participants sur le HPV et les scores d'attitude envers le vaccin contre le HPV, une faible relation positive a été trouvée avec l'hésitation vaccinale. Une faible relation positive a également été détectée entre l'attitude envers la vaccination et l'hésitation vaccinale (p<0,05). Selon le modèle de régression créé dans l'étude, l'attitude envers la vaccination contre le HPV était expliquée par l'Échelle de Connaissances sur le HPV et l'hésitation vaccinale à un taux de 22,5 %. Conformément aux résultats, les professionnels de la santé doivent sensibiliser la société et augmenter les taux de vaccination.

Vaccination homophily in ego contact networks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Vaccine hesitancy is an inevitable risk for societies as it contributes to outbreaks of diseases. Prior research suggests that vaccination decisions of individuals tend to spread within social networks, resulting in a tendency to vaccination homophily. The clustering of individuals resistant to vaccination can substantially make the threshold necessary to achieve herd immunity harder to reach. In this study, we examined the extent of vaccination homophily among social contacts and its association with vaccine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic in Hungary using a contact diary approach in two cross-sectional surveys. The results indicate strong clustering among both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The most powerful predictor of vaccine uptake was the perceived vaccination rate within the egos' social contact network. Vaccination homophily and the role of the interpersonal contact network in vaccine uptake were particularly pronounced in the networks of close relationships, including family, kinship, and strong social ties of the ego. Our findings have important implications for understanding COVID-19 spread dynamics by showing that the strong clustering of unvaccinated individuals posed a great risk in preventing the spread of the disease.

Vaccine hesitancy throughout the COVID-19 vaccination trajectory among immigrant and non-immigrant older adults: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccinations, comparing immigrant and non-immigrant older adults (aged ≥60 years), after accounting for group-level and individual-level characteristics, and the interaction between immigrant and socio-economic status. STUDY DESIGN: This study used a retrospective cohort design. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.2. Logistic regression models had the dependent variables of obtained any COVID-19 vaccinations vs not and obtained all four required COVID-19 vaccinations vs not. The linear regression model's dependent variable was the interval in days between the COVID-19 vaccination availability and the date of obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: In the cohort of older adults (n = 35,109), immigrants were less likely than non-immigrants to obtain a single COVID-19 vaccination (P < 0.001) or the full series of required COVID-19 vaccinations (P < 0.001); however, immigrants vs non-immigrants delayed only in obtaining the first vaccination (P < 0.001) but not the remaining required COVID-19 vaccinations. In the linear regression model, a longer interval before obtaining the first COVID-19 vaccination was associated with immigrant status (P < 0.001), lower socio-economic status (SES; P < 0.001), and the interaction between immigrant status and low SES (P < 0.001), while a shorter interval was associated with preventive behaviours of obtaining seasonal influenza (P < 0.001) or pneumococcal (P < 0.001) vaccinations previously. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrant status in general, and especially when combined with low SES, is a major risk factor for vaccination hesitancy. Reorienting immigrants to embrace preventive healthcare behaviours is key. Culturally appropriate communication campaigns may improve the dissemination of effective vaccination-related information to immigrant communities.

Routines, disruptions, revised decisions: A biographical analysis of vaccination trajectories among Filipino caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Individuals' vaccine attitudes and practices are not static, but instead are shaped and iteratively revised based on new information and experiences. Understanding shifts over the life course could inform novel approaches and indicate opportune points for communicating vaccine information, but little is known about individuals' vaccination biographies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: To explore vaccination biographies in a setting marked by high proportions of vaccine hesitancy and recent large-scale vaccination discourses, we conducted and biographically analyzed n = 29 narrative in-depth interviews with caregivers of small children in the Philippines. RESULTS: Our results outline how the perceived relevance of vaccination and an individual's own attitudes and practices repeatedly changed over the course of their life. While respondents narrated vague memories of early vaccine encounters in their families, at schools, or during vaccination campaigns, vaccine relevance accelerated drastically during respondents' or their partner's first perinatal period. Over the following life phase as caregivers, respondents described iterative shifts in their vaccine stance (based on their own experiences, broader discourses, or changing contexts) until their youngest child 'graduated' from immunization. Respondents' later adulthood and old age were commonly marked by little engagement with immunization (except for the COVID-19 vaccines), until the birth of grandchildren sparked renewed motivation to guide younger generations (whether for or against vaccination). CONCLUSIONS: The relevance of vaccination and associated attitudes or practices repeatedly change over the life course. Vaccine promotion efforts could incorporate these biographical dynamics to align with respondents' informational needs, for example by increased engagement in first perinatal periods, eye-level communication at later phases to acknowledge caregivers' increased sense of expertise, and encouragement of vaccine confident grandparents to engage in younger generations' vaccination decisions. Future research should explore transgenerational vaccine trajectories and the potential of biographically targeted promotion efforts.

Analyzing the 7C psychological antecedents of vaccine acceptance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare sector workers in France: A repeated cross-sectional study (CappVac-Cov).

BACKGROUND: Across various stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and related vaccine recommendations in France, we assessed the association of the 7C-psychological antecedents with vaccine uptake/intention for booster vaccination among healthcare-sector workers (HCSWs). We also assessed whether 7C-antecedent profiles changed over time. METHODOLOGY: The Research Group for the Prevention of Occupational Infections in Healthcare Workers (GERES) conducted three repeated web-surveys which were disseminated by email chain-referral among HCSWs throughout France. The questionnaires waves took place: July-November 2021, February-March 2022 and January-March 2023 (P2, P3 and P4). We also reanalysed data from a prior similar study conducted late 2020-early 2021 (Moirangthem et al. (2022)) (P1). To evaluate the association of 7C-items with vaccine uptake-intention for future vaccination, we estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) using robust variance Poisson regression. We report the 7C-item population attributable loss in vaccine intention. RESULTS: The four surveys (P1-P4) encompassed 5234, 339, 351 and 437 participants. At earlier stages of the vaccine campaign, the principal antecedents of vaccine intention were favorable perception of vaccination benefit-risk-balance (BRB) (vs. unfavorable, aPR: 2.32), reactance to employer encouragement for vaccination (motivates vs. dissuades-me, aPR:2.23), vaccine confidence (vs. not-being-confident, aPR: 1.71) and social conformism towards vaccination (favorable vs. skeptical opinion in private environment, aPR: 1.33). Under a vaccine mandate for HCSWs, only perceiving vaccination as a collective action was associated with current vaccine status (agree vs. disagree, aPR: 2.19). At later stages of the epidemic, hypothetical booster vaccine intentions were strongly associated with BRB perception (favorable vs. unfavorable, aPR: 2.07) and perceiving vaccination as a collective action (agree vs. disagree, aPR: 1.69). Fearing a severe side effect from vaccination decreased population vaccine intention by 26.2 %. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that both 7C-antecedents and their association with vaccine behaviour can change over time, and underscore the importance of assuring confidence in vaccine safety.

Faith and vaccination: a scoping review of the relationships between religious beliefs and vaccine hesitancy.

BACKGROUND: Throughout history, vaccines have proven effective in addressing and preventing widespread outbreaks, leading to a decrease in the spread and fatality rates of infectious diseases. In a time where vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to public health, it is important to identify the intricate interplay of factors exemplified at the individual and societal levels which influence vaccination behaviours. Through this analysis, we aim to shed new light on the dynamics of vaccine hesitancy among religious groups, contributing to the broader effort to promote vaccine uptake, dispel misunderstandings, and encourage constructive dialogue with these groups. METHODS: We used the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) using the 20-point checklist to guide this review. The inclusion criteria for our study were that the literature should be in English, concerned with vaccine hesitancy as the focus of study, study the impact religiosity or religious beliefs as either an outcome or control variable, concerning population levels, and be peer-reviewed. RESULTS: We analysed 14 peer-reviewed articles that included components related to religiosity or religious beliefs and their impact on vaccine hesitancy published until September 2023. All the articles were published in approximately the last decade between 2012 and 2023, with only 4 of the articles published before 2020. Out of the 14 studies included in our review, twelve utilized quantitative methods, while the remaining two employed qualitative approaches. Among the studies included in our analysis, we found various approaches to categorizing religious belief and identity. In most studies when religion is uniformly regarded as the sole determinant of vaccine hesitancy, it consistently emerges as a significant factor in contributing to vaccine hesitancy. All studies in our review reported sociodemographic factors to some degree related to vaccine hesitancy within their sample populations. Our analysis underscored the need for nuanced approaches to addressing vaccine hesitancy among religious groups. CONCLUSION: Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue and driven by a myriad of individual and societal factors among which religious beliefs is commonly associated to be a driver of higher levels among populations.

Need for strategic communications and stakeholder engagement to advance acceptability of an overdose preventing vaccine targeting fentanyl.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid, exposure to which has led to hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths. Novel vaccines are being developed that might protect against fentanyl overdose. Proactive attention to strategic communications and stakeholder engagement may smooth uptake of a novel vaccine given known challenges around vaccine hesitancy and concern for stigma related to substance use. METHODS: Qualitative interviews (N = 74) with a purposive sample of adolescents/young adults with opioid use disorder (OUD), family members of persons with OUD, experts in substance use treatment and harm reduction, and community members were conducted and thematically analyzed to discern attitudes toward a fentanyl vaccine, and directions for communications and engagement. RESULTS: Major themes reflected personal concerns for biomedical risk and system-level concerns for alignment and integration of an overdose preventing vaccine with prevailing beliefs about addiction and associated frameworks and philosophies for treatment and response. CONCLUSION: Acceptability and implementation of a novel fentanyl vaccine targeting overdose will need precision communications that address biomedical, moral/spiritual, and structural perspectives about the nature of addiction. Education about the purpose and limits of a fentanyl vaccine, partnerships with diverse stakeholders from throughout the opioid response ecosystem and interweaving of a vaccine strategy into comprehensive prevention and treatment are recommended.

Psychosocial dimensions of vaccine hesitancy: A systematic review.

Despite widely recognised effectiveness against the spread of COVID-19, vaccine hesitancy persists. This systematic literature review aimed to clarify the definition and the operationalisation of the term 'vaccine hesitancy' and disclose the various psychosocial factors underlying this phenomenon. The results of studies conducted in European countries and in the United States after the vaccines became available were taken into account. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. efinitions and measures of vaccine hesitancy differed across the studies, limiting their comparison. Nonetheless, by drawing on theoretical frameworks, we were able to identify several psychosocial variables in determining vaccine hesitancy. Our findings point to the need for a transdisciplinary approach to understanding the antecedents of vaccine hesitancy. A better understanding of the phenomenon may help to develop interventions and social policies to address a complex challenge such as vaccination hesitancy.