Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-991086

ABSTRACT

Objective:To analyze the diagnostic value of Michigan nerve screening Scale (MNSI), pain, touch and temperature detection combined with vibratory perception threshold (VPT) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).Methods:A total of 500 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who received inpatient treatment in Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch Affiliated of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from January to December 2018 were selected. Sixty four patients with DPN were enrolled in the DPN group, and the remaining 436 patients were enrolled in the no-DPN group. The clinical data and the results of MNSI scale, pain, touch and temperature detection thresholds and VPT of the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze the clinical value of single and combined examination indicators in the diagnosis of DPN.Results:MNSI symptom questionnaire score and MNSI physical examination score in DPN group were higher than those in no-DPN group: (3.00 ± 1.35) scores vs. (1.69 ± 0.52) scores, (1.57 ± 0.50) scores vs. (1.01 ± 0.24) scores; the proportion of touch regression, pain regression and temperature regression was significantly higher than that in no-DPN group; and the levels of VPT in the DPN group was higher than that in the no-DPN group: (26.34 ± 5.03) V vs. (17.97 ± 6.82) V, there were statistical differences ( P<0.01). When the single index was diagnosed, the area under the curve (AUC) value of VPT was the highest (0.825), and significantly higher than the pain, touch and temperature detection ( P<0.01). The AUC value of VPT + MNSI in combined diagnosis was the highest (0.738), and the sensitivity and specificity of DPN diagnosis were 51.56% and 96.10%, respectively. Conclusions:Compared with MNSI scale score, sensory detection such as pain, touch and temperature, VPT has the best diagnostic efficiency for DPN, while combined with MNSI, the specificity can be further improved, but the sensitivity decreases, which is worthy of clinical attention.

2.
J Orthop Res ; 38(3): 620-628, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31608488

ABSTRACT

Osteoarthritis is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALCR), and aberrant gait biomechanics are considered a primary contributor. Somatosensory dysfunction potentially alters gait biomechanics, but this association is unclear. Therefore, the purposes of this investigation were to compare somatosensory function between limbs and evaluate associations between somatosensory function and gait biomechanics linked to osteoarthritis development in individuals with ALCR. Seventy-three volunteers with ALCR participated. Gait biomechanics (peak vertical ground reaction force magnitude and loading rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments, peak knee flexion and varus angles, and quadriceps/hamstrings co-activation) were assessed as subjects walked at their preferred speed. The somatosensory function was assessed via joint position sense error (knee flexion) and vibratory perception threshold (femoral epicondyles, malleoli, and first metatarsal). Though somatosensory function did not differ between the ACLR and contralateral limbs, poorer joint position sense in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates and internal knee extension moments, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial and lateral malleoli and first metatarsal head in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates, greater internal knee valgus moments and varus angles, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial malleolus and first metatarsal head in the contralateral limb was associated with greater peak knee varus angles and internal knee valgus moments. These results suggest that future research evaluating rehabilitation approaches for improving somatosensory function is warranted as a potential approach for restoring normal gait biomechanics and reducing osteoarthritis risk. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:620-628, 2020.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/rehabilitation , Gait/physiology , Knee/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cartilage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electromyography , Female , Hamstring Muscles/physiology , Humans , Knee Joint/physiology , Male , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Proprioception , Quadriceps Muscle/physiopathology , Rehabilitation/methods , Risk , Vibration , Walking , Young Adult
3.
China Occupational Medicine ; (6): 296-300, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-876946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of hand-transmitted vibration exposure on the finger vibratory and pain perception thresholds among drill workers in a gold mine. METHODS: By the judgement sampling method,134 male drill workers from a gold mine in the northern area of China were selected as the hand-transmitted vibration exposure group and102 fit-up workers without vibration exposure in the same mine were chosen as the control group. The finger vibratory perception thresholds,the pain perception thresholds and the occupational health examination were conducted and analyzed in these two groups. Based on the self-report with vibration-induced white finger( VWF),the workers of hand-transmitted vibration exposure group were divided into non-VWF subgroup( 105 workers) and VWF subgroup( 29 workers). RESULTS: The incidence of finger numbness,pain and self-reported white finger in the exposure group were significantly higher than those in the control group( P < 0. 05). Compared with the control group,the vibratory perception thresholds of the index finger,middle finger and ring finger of the right hand among the vibration exposure group workers were significantly higher( P < 0. 05),but there was no significant difference in the vibratory perception thresholds of the left ring finger between the two groups( P > 0. 05). The vibratory perception thresholds of both ring fingers,right index finger and right middle-finger in VWF subgroup were higher than those in control group( P < 0. 05). But no significant differences was found in the above 4 indexes in these two groups after compared to those of control group,respectively( P > 0. 05). The vibratory perception thresholds of left ring finger,right ring finger and right index finger in VWF subgroup were all higher than those in non-VWF subgroup( P < 0. 05),but the vibratory perception thresholds of right middle finger in these two groups showed no significant difference( P > 0. 05). The pain perception thresholds of index finger,middle finger and ring finger in both hands of the vibration exposure group workers were all higher than those in control group( P < 0. 05). The pain perception thresholds of middle finger and ring finger in both hands of the VWF subgroup and non-VWF subgroup were higher than those of control group( P < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: The hand-transmitted vibration can increase the thresholds of finger vibratory and pain perception in drill workers. The finger sensory perception examination could be used to assist the early detection of peripheral nerve damage induced by hand-transmitted vibration.

4.
Article in Korean | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-119859

ABSTRACT

This study was performed to investigate the possibility of temporary threshold shift (TTS) of vibration sense could induced by exposure to high-frequency vibration or by work position taking by dentists in drilling or polishing. The vibratory perception thresholds (VPT) of 28 healthy men were measured on the index fingertip pulp of dominant hand at 250Hz. The vibrating tool used in test was a low-speed handpiece of 34,000 rpm. For the TTS test, the dominant hand was exposed to high-frequency vibration and to work position for five minutes, respectively. The VPTs before and after vibratory exposure were 23.5+/-3.5 dB, 30.8+/-4.2 dB, respectively and VPT after work position was 23.7+/-4.6 dB. The difference between before and after vibartory exposure was statistically significant (P<0.001). The correlation of height, weight and BMl with baseline VPTs was not statistically significant. Also, there was no difference of VPTs by smoking. These results suggest that high-frequency vibration from dental handpieces might cause the impairment of vibration sensation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Dentists , Hand , Sensation , Smoke , Smoking , Vibration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...