Coronavirus takeover of host cell translation and intracellular antiviral response: a molecular perspective.

Coronaviruses are a group of related RNA viruses that cause respiratory diseases in humans and animals. Understanding the mechanisms of translation regulation during coronaviral infections is critical for developing antiviral therapies and preventing viral spread. Translation of the viral single-stranded RNA genome in the host cell cytoplasm is an essential step in the life cycle of coronaviruses, which affects the cellular mRNA translation landscape in many ways. Here we discuss various viral strategies of translation control, including how members of the Betacoronavirus genus shut down host cell translation and suppress host innate immune functions, as well as the role of the viral non-structural protein 1 (Nsp1) in the process. We also outline the fate of viral RNA, considering stress response mechanisms triggered in infected cells, and describe how unique viral RNA features contribute to programmed ribosomal -1 frameshifting, RNA editing, and translation shutdown evasion.

SERINC5 Mediates a Postintegration Block to HIV-1 Gene Expression in Macrophages.

HIV-1 antagonizes SERINC5 by redundant mechanisms, primarily through Nef and additionally via envelope glycoprotein. Paradoxically, HIV-1 preserves Nef function to ensure the exclusion of SERINC5 from virion incorporation regardless of the availability of envelope that can confer resistance, suggesting additional roles of the virion-incorporated host factor. Here, we report an unusual mode of SERINC5 action in inhibiting viral gene expression. This inhibition is observed only in the myeloid lineage cells but not in the cells of epithelial or lymphoid origin. We found that SERINC5-bearing viruses induce the expression of RPL35 and DRAP1 in macrophages, and these host proteins intercept HIV-1 Tat from binding to and recruiting a mammalian capping enzyme (MCE1) to the HIV-1 transcriptional complex. As a result, uncapped viral transcripts are synthesized, leading to the inhibition of viral protein synthesis and subsequent progeny virion biogenesis. Cell-type-specific inhibition of HIV-1 gene expression thus exemplifies a novel antiviral function of virion-incorporated SERINC5. IMPORTANCE In addition to Nef, HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein has been shown to modulate SERINC5-mediated inhibition. Counterintuitively, Nef from the same isolates preserves the ability to prevent SERINC5 incorporation into virions, implying additional functions of the host protein. We identify that virion-associated SERINC5 can manifest an antiviral mechanism independent of the envelope glycoprotein to regulate HIV-1 gene expression in macrophages. This mechanism is exhibited by affecting the viral RNA capping and is plausibly adopted by the host to overcome the envelope glycoprotein-mediated resistance to SERINC5 restriction.

Immune response of mice to non-adapted avian influenza A virus.

Human infections with avian influenza A viruses (IAVs) without or with clinical symptoms of disease were recently reported from several continents, mainly in high risk groups of people, who came into the contact with infected domestic birds or poultry. It was shown that avian IAVs are able to infect humans directly without previous adaptation, however, their ability to replicate and to cause a disease in this new host can differ. No spread of these avian IAVs among humans has been documented until now, except for one case described in Netherlands in the February of 2003 in people directly involved in handling IAV (H7N7)-infected poultry. The aim of our work was to examine whether a low pathogenic avian IAV can induce a virus-specific immune response of biological relevancy, in spite of its restricted replication in mammals. As a model we used a low pathogenic virus A/Duck/Czechoslovakia/1956 (H4N6) (A/Duck), which replicated well in MDCK cells and produced plaques on cell monolayers, but was unable to replicate productively in mouse lungs. We examined how the immune system of mice responds to the intranasal application of this non-adapted avian virus. Though we did not prove the infectious virus in lungs of mice following A/Duck application even after its multiple passaging in mice, we detected virus-specific vRNA till day 8 post infection. Moreover, we detected virus-specific mRNA and de novo synthesized viral nucleoprotein (NP) and membrane protein (M1) in lungs of mice on day 2 and 4 after exposure to A/Duck. Virus-specific antibodies in sera of these mice were detectable by ELISA already after a single intranasal dose of A/Duck virus. Not only antibodies specific to the surface glycoprotein hemagglutinin (HA) were induced, but also antibodies specific to the NP and M1 of IAV were detected by Western blot and their titers increased after the second exposure of mice to this virus. Importantly, antibodies neutralizing virus A/Duck were proved in mouse immune sera after the second dose of virus and a slight increase of mRNA expression of immune mediators tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IP10 has been observed in lungs of these mice 48 hr after the infection. These observations correspond to the limited replication ability of the virus in mice and provided an important information about its ability to induce virus-specific antibodies, including those neutralizing virus, even without the previous virus adaptation to the new mammalian host. Such antibodies could consequently influence the immune potential of exposed individuals and their defensive capability against the newly emerged, even more virulent IAV.

Initiation codon selection is accomplished by a scanning mechanism without crucial initiation factors in Sindbis virus subgenomic mRNA.

Translation initiation of alphavirus subgenomic mRNA (sgmRNA) can occur in the absence of several initiation factors (eIFs) in infected cells; however, the precise translation mechanism is still poorly understood. In this study, we have examined the mechanism of initiation and AUG selection in Sindbis virus (SINV) sgmRNA. Our present findings suggest that sgmRNA is translated via a scanning mechanism, since the presence of a hairpin structure before the initiation codon hampers protein synthesis directed by this mRNA. In addition, translation is partially recovered when an in-frame AUG codon is placed upstream of this hairpin. This scanning process takes place without the participation of eIF4A and active eIF2. These results, combined with our findings through modifying the SINV sgmRNA leader sequence, do not support the possibility of a direct initiation from the start codon without previous scanning, or a shunting mechanism. Moreover, studies carried out with sgmRNAs containing two alternative AUG codons within a good context for translation reveal differences in AUG selection which are dependent on the cellular context and the phosphorylation state of eIF2α. Thus, initiation at the additional AUG is strictly dependent on active eIF2, whereas the genuine AUG codon can start translation following eIF2α inactivation. Collectively, our results suggest that SINV sgmRNA is translated by a scanning mechanism without the potential participation of crucial eIFs. A model is presented that explains the mechanism of initiation of mRNAs bearing two alternative initiation codons.