Local Perineal Capillary Perforator Flaps: A Minimally Invasive Technique for the Correction of Vulvar Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar stenosis is a debilitating condition that compromises sexual function, urination, and the ability to undergo gynecological examinations. The purpose of this study is to describe the technique of capillary perforator perineal flaps (CPPF) for the correction of vulvar stenosis. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients with vulvar stenosis treated through surgical separation and reconstruction with CPPF. The procedure involved vulvar separation with the creation of a subsequent defect, repaired using a flap, harvested laterally to the labia majora including a capillary perforator and transferred through a subcutaneous tunnel to repair the vulvar defect. The functional outcome was evaluated with the Bradford scale, comparing the preoperative and postoperative scores using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: thirteen patients were included, three with stenosis following treatment for vulvar cancer and ten due to lichen sclerosus. In total, we analyzed 29 flaps, with an average size of 15.6 cm2. We always included just one perforator in the flap and no postoperative complications. Stenosis was resolved in all patients, with no recurrences one year after the surgery. The preoperative average severity of the stenosis was 2.3 + 0.6, reducing to 0.3 + 0.4 post-intervention, indicating a significant improvement (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CPPF has proven to be a quick and safe method for the reconstruction of vulvar stenosis.

Genitocrural Island Perforator Flap (GIP-Flap): An ideal surgical technique for covering uni- or bilateral vulvar loss tissue.

Vulvar loss of soft tissue leads to urinary, sexual and morphological dysfunctions. Most patients affected are comorbid making it difficult to perform a flap, which is the most appropriate way to reconstruct. Our multidisciplinary plastic and gynecologic surgery team has developed a new technique using a pedicled internal pudendal island flap. Reconstruction is reliable, quick and applicable to all patients, with a highly satisfactory final appearance.

Secondary post-oncologic vulvar reconstruction - a simplified algorithm.

Introduction: Surgical treatment is the gold standard of care for vulvar cancer and is burdened by a high risk of wound complications due to the poor healing typical of the female genital area. Moreover, this malignancy has a high risk of local relapse even after wide excision. For these reasons, secondary reconstruction of the vulvoperineal area is a relevant and challenging scenario for gynecologists and plastic surgeons. The presence of tissue already operated on and undermined, scars, incisions, the possibility of previous radiation therapy, contamination of urinary and fecal pathogens in the dehiscent wound or ulcerated tumor, and the unavailability of some flaps employed during the primary procedure are typical complexities of this surgery. Due to the rarity of this tumor, a rational approach to secondary reconstruction has never been proposed in the literature. Methods: In this observational retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data of patients affected by vulvar cancer who underwent secondary reconstruction of the vulvoperineal area in our hospital between 2013 and 2023. Oncological, reconstructive, demographic, and complication data were recorded. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of wound complications. The secondary outcome measure was the indication of the different flaps, according to the defect, to establish an algorithm for decision-making. Results: Sixty-six patients were included; mean age was 71.3 ± 9.4 years, and the mean BMI was 25.1 ± 4.9. The mean size of the defect repaired by secondary vulvar reconstruction was 178 cm2 ± 163 cm2. Vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM), anterolateral thigh (ALT), fasciocutaneous V-Y (VY), and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) were the flaps more frequently employed. We observed five cases of wound breakdown, one case of marginal necrosis of an ALT flap, and three cases of wound infection. The algorithm we developed considered the geometry and size of the defect and the flaps still available after previous surgery. Discussion: A systematic approach to secondary vulvar reconstruction can provide good surgical results with a low rate of complications. The geometry of the defect and the use of both traditional and perforator flaps should guide the choice of the reconstructive technique.

Effectual surgical perineal reconstruction of malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a successful surgical treatment and reconstruction in a case of malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old woman had stage II bulky malignant mucosal vulvar melanoma and received wide surgical excision with partial vulvectomy. She underwent 2-steps reconstructive vulvoplasty and vaginoplasty with skin grafting 1 year after initial surgical treatment. There was no evidence of recurrence after 3 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Vulvar melanoma is a rare malignant neoplasm. Wide local excision with reconstruction can relieve pelvic discomfort and restore local function after the surgery.

The inguinal fold as a flaps bank: the inguinal fold island flap (IFI flap).

The aim of this article is to describe an island flap, harvested from the inguinal fold, which can be used for vulvar reconstruction: the inguinal fold island flap (IFI flap). IFI flap is indicated for reconstruction of defects of vaginal vestibule and labia minora and it could be raised bilaterally safeguarding regional symmetry and avoiding vaginal introitus or urethral distortion. This flap has been utilized to reconstruct defects after vulvar melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma resections and in one case to restore vaginal vestibule anatomy in a revision surgery in a transgender woman. IFI flap is an example of an "aesthetic/functional" reconstruction which could be proposed to younger patients too.

Sub-regional skin grafting for perineal resurfacing after excision of superficial vulvar tumors: An excellent method to achieve an aesthetically pleasing appearance.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of sub-regional split-thickness skin grafting in perineal resurfacing. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in the Genital Plastic Surgery Center. Detailed clinical data of 14 consecutive patients who underwent split-thickness skin grafting after vulvar tumor resection from February 2013 to June 2022 were analyzed. Clinical data, postoperative photographs, scoring of vulvar appearance, and questionnaire results of the Female Sexual Function Index before and after surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: The patients had sub-regional split-thickness skin grafting ranging from 7 × 8 cm to 11 × 12 cm (88.86 ± 24.99 cm2 ). After a follow-up of 8.21 ± 2.22 months (mean ± SD), all patients had a three-dimensional and aesthetically pleasing vulva and high scoring of vulvar appearance (mean ± SD, 4.43 ± 0.65). All patients had good healing of both the recipient and donor sites without major complications. Only one patient had minor dehiscence in the perineal region and recovered soon after proper treatment. The scores of the Female Sexual Function Index were significantly improved after surgery. Among the included domains, scores of "desire," "arousal," "orgasm" and "satisfaction" increased significantly after surgery (p value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sub-regional split-thickness skin grafting could achieve excellent cosmetic outcomes with few complications in perineal reconstruction after the excision of superficial vulvar tumors. It can provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance in the vulvar region and improve female sexual function to some extent. In general, sub-regional split-thickness skin grafting could be a recommended reconstructive option to repair vulvar defects.

Experience with flap repair after vulvar carcinoma resection: a retrospective observational study of 26 cases.

Background: A defect caused by the radical resection of vulvar cancer requires repair with flap transplantation or vulvoplasty. However, in clinical practice, the surgeons encounter difficulties while using a flap to repair the wound. Therefore, this study aimed to present a review of our practice of post-surgical defect reconstruction in cases using different skin flaps. Methods: An observational study was performed involving 26 patients with vulvar cancer who were admitted to Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital between February 2015 and February 2020 for surgical and reconstructive procedures. The clinical data of these 26 patients were analyzed. All patients underwent radical resection of vulvar cancer, followed by post-surgical defect repair using random flap or axial flap transplantation (even for very complex defects). The clinical variables collected and the assessment of efficacy included survival of the flap, history of dysfunction of the recipient area, such as scar contracture, and satisfaction of the patient with the shape after external vaginal surgery. Results: Among the 26 cases in this study, all patients underwent 38 soft tissue reconstruction procedures for vulvar perineal defects during the study period. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most commonly diagnosed cancer (80.8%). The average size of the defect was 9.3×7 cm2. Rhomboid flaps were the most commonly used flaps for performing reconstruction in both the primary and recurrent groups. Poor wound healing was the most commonly discovered complication, which occurred in three of the 38 flaps (7.9%) used. Previous surgery or radiotherapy did not increase the rate of complications following successful reconstruction. Conclusions: Different skin flaps are effective premium options for post-surgical defect reconstruction, and the selective use of skin flaps for treating vulvar defects preserves the vulvar morphology and allows for relatively better functionality.

Impact of vulvar reconstruction on the accuracy of a nomogram for predicting local recurrence after surgery for vulvar cancer.

BACKGROUND DATA: Vulvar carcinoma is a rare disease accounting for 3%-5% of all gynaecological cancers. Although surgery is the standard treatment at an early stage, the outcomes are highly correlated with clear resection margins. Therefore, surgical defects can be important and require reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate vulvar reconstructions using a previously validated nomogram predicting the risk of local recurrence at 2 years. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for vulvar cancer between 1998 and 2017 were extracted from eight FRANCOGYN centres. We estimated the probability of local recurrence at 2 years using a previously validated nomogram and compared it with actual relapse in patients with or without vulvar reconstruction. Patients were clustered into tiertiles according to their nomogram score: low-, intermediate-, and high-risk for local relapse probability. RESULTS: We reviewed 254 patients, of whom 49 underwent immediate vulvar reconstruction. The predicted and actual probability of two-year local relapse were 20.1% and 15.7%, respectively, with a concordance index of 0.75. In the low- and intermediate-risk groups, the difference between predicted and observed recurrence was less than 10% in patients with or without vulvar reconstruction. For the high-risk group, the difference reached 25% and observed recurrence probability was lower in patients who underwent vulvar plasty compared with those who did not (20.0% vs. 36.2%, respectively). Local recurrence-free survival rates following vulvar reconstruction were comparable at two years (82.1% vs. 84.8%, respectively, p = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Vulvar reconstruction after surgical resection for vulvar cancer is safe. Vulvar reconstruction should be considered in aggressive cases to decrease local recurrence.

Feasibility, indications and complications of SCIP flap for reconstruction after extirpative surgery for vulvar cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical therapy for vulvar cancer involves wide defects that often require flap-based reconstruction. The goal of the reconstruction is fast wound healing with low donor site morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational cohort study in which we reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for vulvar cancer followed by reconstruction using the Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator (SCIP) flap between 2015 and 2020. The primary outcome measure of this investigation was the incidence of wound complications. The secondary outcomes were the surgical indications in terms of establishing the anatomical subunits involved in the resection that made us choose this flap for reconstruction. This study adheres to the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included; in two cases, the flap was performed bilaterally for a total of 34 SCIP flaps. The mean age of patients was 70.6 ± 8.6 years, and the mean BMI was 26.8 ± 4.7. The SCIP flap was always feasible. The mean flap size was 128.8 ± 74.3cm2. Three patients showed wound complications. In every patient, the defect involved the vulva, perineum and inguinal area; in 18 patients, the mons pubis was also involved. The mean follow-up was 30 months. During the follow-up, six patients died, and four showed local or nodal cancer relapse. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the advantages of SCIP flap for the reconstruction of vulvoperineal defects secondary to vulvar cancer surgery include low complication rate, minimal donor site morbidity, quick dissection, proximity of donor and recipient sites, possibility to harvest large skin islands of variable thickness and chimeric flaps.

Internal pudendal perforator artery flap harvesting without pre-operative imaging: Reliability and approach.

Since its initial description in 1996 by Yii and Niranjan, the internal pudendal perforator flap (also known as the Singapore flap, the gluteal fold flap, and the lotus petal flap) has become a workhorse in perineal soft tissue reconstruction. In 2001, Hashimoto described the presence of three to five perforators in the perineal anogenital triangle. The ischial tuberosity has thus become a useful anatomic landmark for the safe boundary of medial dissection during flap elevation, in order to avoid damaging the perforator vessels. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the perforators' positions within the anogenital triangle by using color Doppler ultrasound. In a study of 15 subjects in the lithotomy position, we identified a total of 24 perforator vessels with a diameter greater than 5 mm. We noted the vessels' positions using orthonormal measurements, according to the distance from the midline and the distance on a straight line between the two ischial tuberosities (i.e. consistent bony anatomic landmarks that are independent of the patient's height and body mass index). The mean distance between the ischial tuberosity and the internal pudendal perforator was 27.3 mm. Based on our present results, we consider that routine ultrasound identification and dissection of the perforators is not always required before pudendal flap harvesting. This decreases the operating time and simplifies the flap harvesting procedure.

The V-Y gluteal fold advancement flap: Outcomes following radical surgery for vulvar malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and complication rate of the V-Y gluteal fold flap in surgery for vulvar cancer. METHODS: From June 2015 to June 2018, 62 patients surgically treated for vulvar cancer were included in the study. Twenty-three (37.1%) underwent plastic reconstructive surgery with V-Y advancement flaps. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was longer for patients undergoing V-Y flap surgery. The margins were positive in six patients (9.7%), close (<8 mm) in 10 (16.1%), and adequate (>8 mm) in 46 (74.2%). Six (9.7%) patients had dehiscence and two (3.2%) patients suffered from necrosis. In patients undergoing V-Y flap reconstruction, two (8.7%) had a wound dehiscence, no patients had necrosis. In patients undergoing direct closure, four (10.3%) had wound dehiscence and two (5.1%) had necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: V-Y gluteal fold advancement technique is a safe procedure, performed in a single surgical session with minimal increase in surgical time and low wound healing complications. Use of this technique was correlated with an increased rate of adequate surgical margins (<8 mm) and reduced need for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A rare and devastating tumor of the vulva.

•Biopsies of a large mass are prone to sampling errors and may lead to an incorrect diagnosis.•MRI imaging of vulvar tumors can aid in surgical planning.•Large sarcomas of the vulva require a multi-disciplinary approach.

Vulvo-vaginal reconstruction after radical excision for treatment of vulvar cancer: Evaluation of feasibility and morbidity of different surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar cancer is a rare disease accounting for approximately 5% of female genital tract tumors worldwide. Currently surgery represents the mainstay alone or sometimes, in combination with chemo-radiotherapy, for locally advanced tumors and recurrent disease. However, significant physical and sexual impairment mostly due to anatomical distortion of external genitalia are a consequence of radical surgical treatment. Postoperative reconstruction after demolitive surgeries improves aesthetic and functional results, guarantees an adequate coverage of large tumors and assures safe surgical margin. The present study aimed to analyze feasibility and complication rates of fascio-cutaneous flap after excision for vulvovaginal malignancies. METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched for records of validated vulvovaginal reconstructive techniques after demolitive surgery for vulvar cancer. All cohorts were rated for quality using a scoring method taking into account the design of the study, the sample size and quality of report of surgical data and complications. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies met all eligibility criteria for this systematic review. All the studies were realized between 1996 and 2015. The overall sample size was 443 patients. Two major group of flap according to type of movement were identified: Advancement Flap (V-Y Gluteal Fold Flap; Medial Thigh Flap) and Transpositional Flap (Lotus Petal Flap; Gluteal Thigh Flap; Gluteal Fold Flap and Anterolateral Thigh Flap). The overall complications rates reported for advancement (26.7% among 165 patients on 11 series) and transposition flaps (22.3% among 278 patients on 13 series) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored procedure, based on patients' characteristics, size and location of the defect is still the goal of a successful reconstructive surgery. Proper planning of the surgical procedures, knowledge of the different surgical options and technical skills are required in order to obtain reliable and satisfying results.

[Complex vulvar reconstruction following female genital mutilation/cutting]. / Die komplexe Rekonstruktion der Vulva nach weiblicher Genitalverstümmelung/Genitalbeschneidung.

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a worldwide problem affecting millions of women and is especially common in Africa and Arabia. Women suffer from serious physical and psychological problems. Anatomic reconstruction, therefore, is an important and life-changing option for many affected women. OBJECTIVES: This work gives a short overview of specialized techniques invented by the author for functional and aesthetic vulvar reconstruction following FGM/C. This work does not intend to provide anatomic or surgical details. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anterior obturator artery perforator flap (aOAP flap), the omega domed flap (OD flap), and a microsurgical procedure called neurotizing and molding of the clitoral stump (NMCS procedure) are described. RESULTS: The aOAP-flap for vulvar reconstruction, the OD-flap for clitoral prepuce reconstruction, and the NMCS-procedure for reconstruction of the clitoral tip provided natural, reliable, and long-lasting results, all of which normalize the anatomy of the mutilated outer female genitalia. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstructive options presented contribute to re-establish normal anatomy and, thus, support women's health and relieve the burden forced upon them by FGM/C.

Massive Vulvar Linear Verrucous Epidermal Nevus Presenting at Menarche.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal nevi are benign hamartomatous growths of the skin that present at birth and develop in early childhood often linearly along the "lines of Blaschko." Verrucous linear epidermal nevi are the most common epidermal nevi and often are located on the trunk or extremities. There is minimal evidence regarding vulvar involvement and subsequent management of the associated cosmetic deformity in this anatomic location. CASE: An 11-year-old menarchal girl who underwent full-thickness dermal excision of a 9.6 × 4.5 × 3.2 cm left benign vulvar epidermal nevus (noninflammatory type) with primary reconstruction and closure using a mons rotational skin flap. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: Surgical excision of large vulvar nevi can be achieved with desirable cosmetic outcomes with use of rotational skin flaps and primary closure.

Reconstrucción vulvoperineal en cáncer vulvar / Vulvoperineal reconstruction in vulvar cancer

Resumen ANTECEDENTES: Los estadios clínicos avanzados del cáncer vulvar representan un reto quirúrgico y un abordaje que requiere ser multidisciplinario, con cirugía plástica que provea márgenes quirúrgicos adecuados, con menor tasa de complicaciones, cierre primario de la herida e inicio temprano de la terapia oncológica coadyuvante. OBJETIVOS: Describir y exponer las alternativas de reconstrucción vulvoperineal para pacientes con cáncer vulvar, atendidas en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Análisis descriptivo y retrospectivo de casos de pacientes a quienes se hizo reconstrucción vulvoperineal en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México, entre enero y diciembre de 2015, por el mismo cirujano plástico. Se muestra el algoritmo basado en su experiencia. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 11 casos de pacientes operadas con diferentes técnicas de reconstrucción vulvoperineal, por defectos quirúrgicos del cáncer vulvar y se expuso el algoritmo utilizado y la experiencia del cirujano. CONCLUSIONES: Se revisaron las diferentes alternativas de reconstrucción para subsanar defectos quirúrgicos en pacientes con cáncer vulvar. Los algoritmos de tratamiento quirúrgico previamente publicados son confusos y complejos, quizá por la baja incidencia del cáncer vulvar y las diversas opciones de procedimientos de reconstrucción.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Vulvar cancer is a relatively infrequent disease, that constitutes 1-5% of all gynecological cancers. Surgery is the mainstay treatment is adequate resection, and lymph node evaluation, often have a high risk of relapse that may reach 65%. ADVANCED: Stages are a surgical challenge and multidisciplinary ap proach with plastic surgery will provide adequate surgical margins, less complications, adequate wound closure, and early adjuvant treat ment starting; as well as excellent cosmetic results, with functional, psychological and sexual morbidity decreased. OBJECTIVES: To describe and present the alternatives of vulvoperineal reconstruction in vulvar cancer at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis of eleven cases of vulvoperineal reconstruction in vulvar cancer was performed from January 2015 to December 2015, at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico; for one plastic surgeon; and demonstrated the algorithm base don their experience. RESULTS: We performed 11 patients of vulvar reconstruction with different reconstructive techniques, such as gracilis flapping, pudend, with a high success rate. as well as, to propose an algorithm based in our experience with vulvar cancer reconstruction at Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico. CONCLUSION: The present article aims to review the reconstructive alternatives in Vulvar Cancer, several algorithms for surgical treatment have been published before; but they tend to be complex, in part be cause of the low incidence of Vulvar Cancer and the several options of reconstructive procedures.

Surgical therapy of vulvar cancer: how to choose the correct reconstruction?

OBJECTIVE: To create a comprehensive algorithmic approach to reconstruction after vulvar cancer ablative surgery, which includes both traditional and perforator flaps, evaluating anatomical subunits and shape of the defect. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 80 cases of reconstruction after vulvar cancer ablative surgery, performed between June 2006 and January 2016, transferring 101 flaps. We registered the possibility to achieve the complete wound closure, even in presence of very complex defects, and the postoperative complications. On the basis of these experience, analyzing the choices made and considering the complications, we developed an algorithm to help with the selection of the flap in vulvoperineal reconstruction after oncologic ablative surgery for vulvar cancer. RESULTS: We employed eight types of different flaps, including 54 traditional fasciocutaneous V-Y flaps, 23 rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, 11 anterolateral thigh flaps, three V-Y gracilis myocutaneous flaps, three free style perforators V-Y flaps from the inner thigh, two Limberg flaps, two lotus flaps, two deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, and one superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap. The structures most frequently involved in resection were vulva, perineum, mons pubis, groins, vagina, urethra and, more rarely, rectum, bladder, and lower abdominal wall. CONCLUSION: The algorithm we implemented can be a useful tool to help flap selection. The key points in the decision-making process are: anatomical subunits to be covered, overall shape and symmetry of the defect and some patient features such as skin laxity or previous radiotherapy. Perforator flaps, when feasible, must be considered standard in vulvoperineal reconstruction, although in some cases traditional flaps remain the best choice.

Surgical reconstruction in female genital mutilation.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is an unusual condition for our country. However, an increase in FGM in future days can be predicted with the increasing numbers of exchange students coming from African countries, migration of refugees and socioeconomic relations with the African countries. We want to share our experience of two FGM victims admitted to our clinic with the request of reconstructive vulvar surgery before their marriage. Both women had WHO Type III FGM. Physical examination findings and surgical reconstruction techniques were presented.