Weight Bias in the Perinatal Period: An Integrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights in healthcare settings is associated with adverse health behaviors, reduced healthcare utilization, and poor health outcomes. The purpose of this integrative review was to explore: (1) What has been measured and described regarding perinatal care providers' and students' weight bias toward pregnant, birthing, and postpartum individuals with higher body weights? (2) What has been measured and described regarding pregnant, birthing, and postpartum individuals' experiences of weight bias? (3) What is the association of experiences of weight bias with perinatal and mental health outcomes among pregnant, birthing, and postpartum individuals? METHODS: We conducted a systematic search in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases to identify relevant research publications related to the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms weight prejudice (and related terms) and pregnancy (and related terms). The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice model for study quality determination, and the Whittemore and Knafl integrative review framework for data extraction and analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-two publications met inclusion criteria, representing six countries and varying study designs. This review found pervasive sources of explicit weight bias in the perinatal period, including care providers and close relationships. Experiences of weight bias among pregnant and postpartum individuals are associated with adverse perinatal and mental health outcomes. DISCUSSION: The findings address a knowledge gap regarding a summary of literature on weight bias in the perinatal period and elucidate its prevalence as well as its negative influence on perinatal and mental health outcomes. Future research efforts on this topic must examine the nature and extent of perinatal care providers' weight bias by demographic factors and explore its association with clinical decision-making and perinatal and mental health outcomes.

"In an ideal world": A qualitative exploration of shared decision-making and weight stigma in antenatal care.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making supports women's autonomy in antenatal care, but several barriers to shared decision-making have been identified in practice. Women with high body mass index experience a higher rate of interventions, which could provide more opportunities for shared decision-making in antenatal care. However, weight stigma may exist as a barrier to shared decision-making, limiting access to collaborative care. AIM: To explore how shared decision-making is implemented and whether body mass index influences maternity clinicians' use of shared decision-making when providing antenatal care for women. METHODS: Maternity clinicians were recruited via purposive sampling from two sites in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Twelve maternity clinicians consented to participate. Three themes and ten sub-themes were identified. The themes were: 1) Whose choice is it anyway? 2) Pregnancy as risky 3) Excess weight as a diseased state. DISCUSSION: Maternity clinicians in this study view pregnancy through a risk management lens that complicates women's involvement in decision-making, demonstrating inherent beliefs that may further limit options for women with high body mass index. CONCLUSION: Shared decision-making is difficult to implement in the current antenatal clinic setting and requires significant structural consideration to become a reality for women. Clinicians may inadvertently limit meaningful opportunities to engage in shared decision-making with women with high body mass index due to preconceived perceptions of risk and stigmatising beliefs about women with high body mass index.

"Ask for my ideas first": Experiences of antenatal care and shared decision-making for women with high body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making supports women's choices in pregnancy. Women with high body mass index (≥35 kg/m2) experience a high rate of interventions in pregnancy, labour, and birth, providing an opportunity for clinicians to implement shared decision-making in practice. However, weight stigma may limit women's opportunities for shared decision-making. AIM: To understand how pregnant women with high body mass index perceive their involvement in antenatal decision-making, including whether weight stigma influences their experience. METHODS: Women with high body mass index were recruited via purposive sampling from two sites in Melbourne, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Ten pregnant women consented to participate. Three themes and six sub-themes were identified. These were: 1) Trusting the system, 2) Who takes the lead?, and 3) Defying disease. DISCUSSION: Shared decision-making is limited for women with high body mass index in antenatal care, and weight stigma is experienced by women. Clinical practice recommendations relating to excess weight have the potential to further limit women's involvement in decision-making if adequate support is not provided to ensure women's understanding and involvement in care. CONCLUSION: Women's involvement in care is a central component of shared decision-making and it is currently limited for women with high body mass index. Transparency regarding the rationale for recommendations is required, and further work must be done to address the influence and impact of weight stigma on the care of women with high body mass index.

Diabetes misconceptions, seriousness, motivation, self-efficacy and stigma: A cross-sectional comparison of eight Australian diabetes communication campaign videos.

AIM: This study examines potential intended (attitudes, motivation and self-efficacy) and unintended (stigmatisation of diabetes) consequences of past Australian National Diabetes Week campaign videos. Further, outcomes are compared by the extent to which participants perceived their allocated video as stigmatising diabetes. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, ten-arm study, participants (adults with or without diabetes; 1:2 ratio) were randomly allocated to view one of eight archival diabetes campaign videos (intervention), or either an active or passive control group. Post-exposure, study-specific scales measured diabetes Misconceptions and Seriousness, General and Diabetes Risk-Reduction Motivation and Self-efficacy, and perceptions of video Stigmatisation of diabetes. Scores were compared by condition (intervention vs. control) and by campaign Stigma (highest vs. lowest tertile score), separately by cohort (with or without diabetes). RESULTS: The sample included n = 1023 without diabetes; and n = 510 with diabetes (79% type 2 diabetes). No significant differences in outcomes were observed between conditions (intervention vs. control), with one exception: a modest effect on General Self-efficacy among those without diabetes only. Those perceiving high campaign Stigma (15%), relative to low Stigma (60%), reported significantly greater diabetes Misconceptions, lower perceived Seriousness and (among those without diabetes only) lower General Motivation but higher Diabetes Risk Reduction Motivation. CONCLUSION: Though limited to a single-exposure, we found little meaningful positive influence of past diabetes campaign videos on diabetes attitudes, behavioural intentions or self-efficacy. Further, campaign videos were perceived as stigmatising by a minority-a potential harmful impact. This novel study has implications for the design, implementation and evaluation of future diabetes campaigns.

Determining Associations Among Health Orientation, Fitness Orientation, and Attitudes Toward Fatness in Physiotherapists and Physiotherapy Students Using Structural Equation Modeling.

Purpose: Research suggests physiotherapists hold negative attitudes and beliefs toward fatness and fat people. Physiotherapists are also health-conscious, and invested in healthy lifestyle behaviours including physical activity. Our purpose was to describe relationships between health orientation, fitness orientation, and fat attitudes. Methods: Physiotherapists (n = 187) and physiotherapy students (n = 34) completed an online survey (Health Orientation Scale, Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire, Fat Attitudes Assessment Toolkit). Structural equation modeling estimated associations between fat attitudes (dependent variable) and health and fitness orientation (independent variables). Results: Participants scored high in orientation toward fitness and health. We found strong positive associations between fitness orientation and health orientation (p < 0.001). Health orientation was not significantly associated with fat attitudes (p = 0.075), whereas increased age was associated with more positive fat attitudes (p < 0.01). Although most participants acknowledged that factors outside an individual's control contribute to body weight, many also agreed with normative negative perspectives. Conclusions: Physiotherapists are highly oriented toward fitness and health. This may underlie beliefs in the controllability of body weight and contribute to negative attitudes toward fatness and fat people. Further research, with greater sample sizes is necessary to further investigate associations between health orientation and fat attitudes.

Objectif: selon les recherches, les physiothérapeutes ont des attitudes et croyances négatives à l'égard de l'obésité et des personnes obèses. Ils sont également soucieux de la santé et investis dans des comportements sains, y compris l'activité physique. Les chercheurs visaient à décrire la relation entre l'orientation vers la santé, l'orientation vers la forme physique et les attitudes vers l'obésité. Méthodologie: les physiothérapeutes (n = 187) et les étudiants en physiothérapie (n = 34) ont rempli un sondage en ligne (échelle d'orientation vers la santé, questionnaire multidimensionnel des relations entre le corps et soi, outil d'évaluation des attitudes envers l'obésité). Les chercheurs ont utilisé la modélisation des équations structurelles pour estimer les associations entre les attitudes envers l'obésité (variables dépendantes) et l'orientation vers la santé et la forme physique (variables indépendantes). Résultats: les participants ont obtenu un résultat élevé à l'égard de l'orientation vers la forme physique et vers la santé. Les chercheurs ont trouvé des associations positives vigoureuses entre l'orientation vers la forme physique et l'orientation vers la santé (p < 0,001). L'orientation vers la santé n'était pas associée de manière significative aux attitudes envers l'obésité (p = 0,075), mais un âge plus avancé était associé à des attitudes plus positives envers l'obésité (p < 0,01). Même si la plupart des participants reconnaissent que des facteurs hors du contrôle individuel contribuent au poids, bon nombre conviennent également avoir des points de vue négatifs normatifs. Conclusions: les physiothérapeutes sont fortement orientés vers la forme physique et la santé, ce qui peut sous-tendre des croyances à l'égard de la contrôlabilité du poids et contribuer à des attitudes négatives envers l'obésité et les personnes obèses. Il faudra réaliser des recherches plus approfondies auprès d'échantillons plus importants pour étudier les associations entre l'orientation vers la santé et les attitudes envers l'obésité de manière plus approfondie.

Weight Bias Among Certified Nurse-Midwives and Certified Midwives: Findings From a National Sample.

INTRODUCTION: Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights permeates health care settings in the United States and has been associated with poor weight-related communication and quality of care as well as adverse health outcomes. However, there has been limited quantitative investigation into weight bias among perinatal care providers. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs)/certified midwives (CMs) attend approximately 11% of all births in the United States. The aims of this study were to measure the direction and extent of weight bias among CNMs/CMs and compare their levels of weight bias to the US public and other health professionals. METHODS: Through direct postcard distribution, social media accounts, professional networks, and email listservs, American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB)-certified midwives were solicited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias using the Implicit Association Test and their explicit weight bias using the Antifat Attitudes Questionnaire, Fat Phobia Scale, and Preference for Thin People measure. RESULTS: A total of 2257 midwives participated in the survey, yielding a completion rate of 17.7%. Participants were mostly White and female, with a median age of 46 years and 11 years since AMCB certification. More than 70% of midwives have some level of implicit weight bias, although to a lesser extent compared with previously published findings among the US public (P < .01) and other health professionals (P < .01). In a subsample comparison of female midwives to female physicians, implicit weight bias levels were similar (P > .05). Midwives also express explicit weight bias, but at lower levels than the US public and other health professionals (P < .05). DISCUSSION: This study provides the first quantitative research documenting weight bias among a national US sample of perinatal care providers. Findings can inform educational efforts to mitigate weight bias in the perinatal care setting and decrease harm.

Implicit and Explicit Weight Bias among Midwives: Variations Across Demographic Characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Weight bias toward individuals with higher body weights is present in health care settings. However, there has been limited quantitative exploration into weight bias among perinatal care providers and its potential variations based on demographic characteristics. The aim of this study was to examine if the direction and extent of weight bias among midwives certified by the American Midwifery Certification Board (AMCB) varied across age, years since certification, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, and US geographic region. METHODS: Through direct email listservs, postcard distribution, social media accounts, and professional networks, midwives were invited to complete an online survey of their implicit weight bias (using the Implicit Association Test) and their explicit weight bias using the Anti-Fat Attitudes Questionnaire (AFA), Fat Phobia Scale (FPS), and Preference for Thin People (PTP) measure. RESULTS: A total of 2106 midwives who identified as Black or White and resided in one of 4 US geographic regions participated in the survey. Midwives with a lower BMI expressed higher levels of implicit (P <.01) and explicit (P ≤.01) weight bias across all 4 measures except for the AFA Fear of Fat Subscale. Implicit weight bias levels also varied by age (P <.001) and years since certification (P <.001), with lower levels among younger midwives (vs older) and those with fewer years (vs more) since certification. Only age and BMI remained significant (P <.001) after adjusting for other demographic characteristics. Lower explicit weight bias levels were found among midwives who identified as Black (vs White) on 2 measures (FPS: adjusted ß = -0.07, P = .004; PTP: P = .01). DISCUSSION: This was the first quantitative study of how weight bias varies across demographic characteristics among a national sample of midwives. Further exploration is needed in more diverse samples. In addition, research to determine whether weight bias influences clinical decision-making and quality of care is warranted.

Weight Stigma in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Being stigmatized because of one's weight can pose physical, mental, and social challenges. While weight stigma and its consequences are established throughout Europe, North America, and Australasia, less is known about weight stigma in other regions. The objective of this study was to identify the extent and focus of weight stigma research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. METHODS: A scoping review of weight stigma research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa was conducted. SCOPUS and PsychINFO databases were searched, and weight stigma experts were contacted to identify relevant literature. Sources were classified based on country/region, population, setting, and category of weight stigma researched. RESULTS: A total of 130 sources were identified from 33 countries and territories. Results indicate that weight stigma has been investigated across populations and settings, mainly focusing on manifestations of weight stigma through experiences, practices, drivers, and personal outcomes of these manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: Weight stigma is a developing global health concern not restricted to Europe, North America, and Australasia. The extent and focus of weight stigma research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa vary between countries and regions leaving several research gaps that require further investigation.

Mitigating Weight Bias in the Clinical Setting: A New Approach to Care.

Weight bias toward patients in larger bodies is pervasive among health care providers and can negatively influence provider-patient communication, as well as patients' behavior and health outcomes. Weight bias has historical roots that perpetuate thinness and Whiteness as the cultural norm. Although weight bias remains socially acceptable in US culture, contributing factors to an individual's body size are complex and multifactorial. Providers and health care systems also consistently use body mass index (BMI) as an indicator of health status, despite its limitations and harmful effects in the clinical setting. This state of the science review presents 8 evidence-based strategies that demonstrate how to mitigate harm from weight bias and improve quality of care and health outcomes for patients living in larger bodies. Person-centered approaches to care include (1) eliminating clinical recommendations to lose weight; (2) shifting from a focus on weight to health; (3) implementing a size and weight-inclusive approach; (4) engaging in weight bias self-evaluation; (5) creating a welcoming environment for patients of all sizes; (6) seeking permission and learning the patient's story; (7) using weight-inclusive language; and (8) re-evaluating clinical guidelines and policies based on BMI. Midwives and other health care providers may benefit from training that re-imagines the delivery of health care to patients in larger bodies.

Mapeamento de intervenções para redução do estigma da obesidade em profissionais de saúde: desenvolvimento e apresentação da intervenção / Mapping interventions to reduce obesity stigma in healthcare professionals: development and presentation of the intervention

Resumo O estigma da obesidade, também popularmente chamado de gordofobia, é uma realidade atual e sua superação é um desafio complexo. As concepções negativas acerca do excesso de peso também se encontram presentes entre profissionais de saúde, prejudicando a assistência prestada e trazendo danos ainda maiores na saúde de pacientes com obesidade. O objetivo do artigo é apresentar o processo de desenvolvimento de uma intervenção para redução do estigma da obesidade voltada para profissionais de saúde, que utilizou como referencial teórico o protocolo Mapeamento de Intervenções. Descreveu-se como foi realizada a avaliação de necessidades e detalharam-se as etapas referentes ao desenho e à produção da intervenção, tendo como produto final um protocolo de intervenção para redução do estigma da obesidade em profissionais de saúde pronto para ser implementado. O protocolo tem carga horária total de 20h, organizado em dez módulos, cada um com a descrição do formato e duração, objetivo, conteúdo, estratégias pedagógicas, materiais, referências e resultados esperados. O produto final representa uma contribuição para a área de saúde, que tem a intervenção elaborada minuciosamente sobre um arcabouço teórico, passível de ser aplicada e reaplicada em diferentes contextos.

Abstract The stigma of obesity, also popularly called fatphobia, is a current reality and overcoming it is a complex challenge. Negative conceptions about being overweight are also present among health professionals, compromising the care provided and causing even greater damage to the health of obese patients. The article aims to present the process of developing an intervention to reduce the stigma of obesity aimed at health professionals, which used the Intervention Mapping protocol as a theoretical framework. It was described how the needs assessment was carried out and the steps relating to the design and production of the intervention were detailed, with the final product being an intervention protocol to reduce the stigma of obesity in healthcare professionals ready to be implemented. The protocol has a total workload of 20 hours, organized into ten modules, each with a description of the format and duration, objective, content, pedagogical strategies, materials, references and expected results. The final product represents a contribution to the health area, with the intervention being meticulously elaborated on a theoretical framework, capable of being applied and reapplied in different contexts.

Weight Discrimination and Health Risk Behavior in Racial, Ethnic, and Sexual Minority Adults.

BACKGROUND: People with obesity face significant discrimination due to their weight. Exposure to such discrimination is associated with poor health outcomes. Little is known about pathways that explain that association, and even less is known about those pathways in racial, ethnic, and sexual minorities. Health risk behaviors may serve as one such pathway. PURPOSE: We examined associations between weight discrimination and health risk behaviors and assessed whether associations are moderated by gender, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. METHODS: Quota sampling was used to oversample Black (36%), Latino (36%), and sexual minority (29%) adults (n = 2,632) who completed an online survey. Using regression analysis, health risk behaviors (maladaptive eating behaviors, physical inactivity, sitting, smoking, alcohol use, and sleep disturbance) were predicted from previous experience with weight discrimination while controlling for demographic characteristics, BMI, and depressive symptoms. Additional analyses tested for interactions between weight discrimination and key demographic variables (i.e., gender, race, ethnicity, and sexual minority status). RESULTS: Weight discrimination was associated with greater emotional eating, binge eating, unhealthy weight control behaviors, cigarette smoking, problematic alcohol use, and sleep disturbance. Gender moderated the association between weight discrimination and binge eating, alcohol use, and physical activity, with stronger effects observed in men than women. Exploratory analyses provided limited evidence for differential effects of weight discrimination across specific combinations of intersecting identities. CONCLUSIONS: Weight discrimination was associated with engagement in unhealthy behaviors and relationships were largely similar across diverse demographic groups. Health risk behaviors may represent a key pathway through which weight discrimination harms health.

People with high body weight remain one of the most stigmatized groups in the USA and face significant discrimination due to their weight. Experiencing weight discrimination is associated with poor health, yet little is known about the underlying pathways that explain this association and even less is known about those pathways in socially marginalized groups. We investigated unhealthy behavior as a possible a pathway by assessing associations between weight discrimination and several health risk behaviors and identifying whether those associations vary by gender, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. A diverse sample of 2,632 U.S. adults completed an online survey. Previous experience with weight discrimination was found to be associated with greater emotional eating, binge eating, unhealthy weight control behaviors, cigarette smoking, problematic alcohol use, and poor sleep. The association between weight discrimination and binge eating, alcohol use, and physical activity was stronger in men than in women, yet exploratory analyses provided limited evidence for differential effects of weight discrimination across specific combinations of intersecting identities. Weight discrimination was associated with engagement in unhealthy behaviors and associations were largely similar across participants from diverse demographic groups. Health risk behaviors may represent a key pathway through which weight discrimination harms health.

Weight-biased attitudes about pediatric patients with obesity in Dutch healthcare professionals from seven different professions.

Little is known about the prevalence of negative weight-biased attitudes among Dutch healthcare professionals (HCPs) when treating children and adolescents with obesity and whether interdisciplinary differences are present. Accordingly, we asked Dutch HCPs that treat pediatric patients with obesity to complete a validated 22-item self-report questionnaire about their weight-biased attitudes. In total, 555 HCPs participated from seven different disciplines: 41 general practitioners (GPs), 40 pediatricians, 132 youth healthcare physicians, 223 youth healthcare nurses, 40 physiotherapists, 40 dieticians, and 39 mental health professionals. HCPs from all disciplines reported to experience negative weight-biased attitudes among themselves. Pediatricians and GPs scored highest on negative weight-biased attitudes, including frustrations in treating children with obesity, and feeling less confident and prepared to treat children with obesity. Dieticians scored the least negative weight-biased attitudes. Participants from all groups perceived weight bias expressed by their colleagues, toward children with obesity. These findings are comparable to results reported by adult HCPs from other countries. Interdisciplinary differences were found and underscore the need for more research on contributing factors that impact explicit weight bias among pediatric HCPs.

A história de uma mulher negra e gorda: cotidiano, afetividade e sexualidade / The story of a fat black woman: daily life, affectivity and sexuality

Resumo Toda mulher que foge do rígido padrão de beleza atual sofre julgamento, rejeição, críticas e é propícia à marginalização - este é o caso das mulheres gordas. O preconceito sofrido pelas pessoas gordas é chamado de gordofobia e limita a vida desses indivíduos, impedindo inclusive que estes vivenciem sua sexualidade plenamente. Este trabalho realizou um relato de caso sobre a percepção do corpo gordo por parte de uma mulher adulta, gorda, de baixa renda e negra e como o ser gorda perpassa a vida desta mulher e sua relação afetiva e sexual com seu companheiro. Constatou-se que as mulheres gordas sentem insatisfação em relação aos seus corpos e comparam-se aos estereótipos de beleza difundidos pela mídia, o que lhes causa frustração e sentimentos de inferioridade. Preconceito, isolamento e exclusão são constantes na vida das mulheres em função de seus corpos grandes e volumosos. Esse preconceito se potencializa nas mulheres negras, uma vez que o racismo é estrutural e a população negra segue sendo marginalizada. O sofrimento e o impacto do corpo gordo no cotidiano, na autoestima, na relação sexual e afetiva são constantemente pauta na vida da mulher gorda, e a gordofobia emerge como razão considerável de sofrimento psíquico, sobretudo para a mulher.

Abstract Every woman who runs away from the current rigid standard of beauty suffers judgment, rejection, criticism and is prone to marginalization, this is the case for fat women. The prejudice suffered by fat people is called fatphobia and limits the lives of these individuals, even preventing them from fully experiencing their sexuality. This work carried out a case report on the perception of the fat body according to an adult woman, fat, low-income, and black and how the fat permeating the life of this woman and her affective and sexual relationship with her partner. It was found that fat women feel dissatisfied with their bodies and compare themselves to the stereotypes of beauty spread by the media, which causes them frustration and feelings of inferiority. Prejudice, isolation, and exclusion are constant in women's lives due to their large and bulky bodies. This prejudice is potentiated in black women, since racism is structural, and the black population continues to be marginalized. Suffering and the impact of the fat body in daily life, in self-esteem, in sexual and emotional relationships are constantly on the agenda of fat women, and fatphobia emerges as a considerable reason for psychological suffering, especially for women.

Obesidad: alternativas al paradigma pesocéntrico y patologizante. Primera entrega / Obesity: alternatives to the weight-centric and pathologizing paradigm. First part

Si bien para los médicos la obesidad es una palabra técnica, para muchas personas tiene la implicaría de un largo sufrimiento en relación a su cuerpo. Históricamente, la medicina tradicional se ha comportado como una barrera en la atención a las personas con exceso de peso debido a la gordofobia y a una perspectiva reduccionista pesocentrista. Es preocupante que las ciencias y prácticas de la salud aún tengan esta mirada sobre la gordura, ya que supone un sesgo que impide que las personas sean atendidas integralmente, vulnerando sus derechos en nombre de una preocupación médica y anteponiendo el descenso de peso frente a otras necesidades de los pacientes. Este artículo, si bien intenta modestamente abrir una reflexión filosófica sobre el cuerpo, la medicina hegemónica y la enfermedad, también tiene como objetivo brindar herramientas técnicas y no técnicas para abordar la obesidad desde otro lugar. En esta primera entrega, desarrollaremos el abordaje integral de la persona con cuerpo gordo. La segunda entrega estará enfocada en los tratamientos farmacológicos, no farmacológicos y quirúrgicos de la obesidad. (AI)

Although obesity is a technical word for doctors, it implies long-term suffering in relation to their bodies for many people. Historically, traditional medicine has behaved as a barrier in caring for people with excess weight due to fatphobia and aweight-centric reductionist perspective. It is worrying that health sciences and practices still have this view of fatness, sinceit implies a bias that prevents people from being thoroughly cared for, violating their rights in the name of medical concernand putting weight loss before other patients' needs. This article modestly attempts to open a philosophical reflection about the body, hegemonic medicine, and disease, while also aiming to provide technical and non-technical tools to approach obesity. In this first part, we will explain the comprehensive approach to the person with a fat body. The second part will focus on pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical treatments for obesity. (AU)

Drivers of medicalization in the Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guidelines.

The new Canadian Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guidelines frame higher body weight as a chronic, relapsing disease requiring comprehensive medical treatment pathways. In this commentary, we will demonstrate how a process called pharmaceuticalization is informing the new guidelines. We join those questioning the normalization of industry and medical collaboration and interrogate whether the new guidelines meaningfully address stigma.

RéSUMé: Les nouvelles Lignes directrices canadiennes de pratique clinique de l'obésité chez l'adulte présentent le poids corporel élevé comme une maladie chronique récurrente nécessitant un parcours de soins médicaux complet. Dans notre commentaire, nous montrerons que ces nouvelles lignes directrices sont éclairées par un processus de « pharmaceuticalisation ¼. Nous joignons notre voix aux personnes qui remettent en question la normalisation de la collaboration entre l'industrie et la médecine, et nous nous demandons si les nouvelles lignes directrices abordent utilement la stigmatisation.

Weight stigma in the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Weight stigma is a phenomenon associated with adverse behavioural and psychological consequences. Although experts suggest that its increase during the COVID-19 pandemic may be associated with worse health outcomes for people with obesity, a thorough analysis of the main findings and gaps is still needed when relating to this subject. OBJECTIVE: We aim to answer three questions: (1) How does weight stigma manifest in the COVID-19 pandemic? (2) How can weight stigma affect people with overweight or obesity in times of COVID-19? (3) What are the perceptions and experiences of weight stigma during the pandemic in individuals who experience overweight or obesity? METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of studies addressing weight stigma and the COVID-19 pandemic in electronic databases (Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, BVS/Lilacs, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and OpenGrey) published until 10th August 2021. All relevant studies were reviewed in full by two researchers. In addition, a narrative synthesis of the data was performed. RESULTS: The results included 35 studies out of 8,090 records and identified 13 original research publications, 14 text and opinion papers, and 6 narrative reviews. The results revealed the presence of weight stigma in the media, healthcare settings, interpersonal relationships, and public campaigns during the COVID-19 pandemic. The evidence of increasing weight stigma in the COVID-19 outbreak is limited, though. Many weight discrimination consequences were described during this time, such as impairment in accessing healthcare, worst COVID-19 outcomes, and maladaptive eating. However, only maladaptive behaviours and decline in mental health outcomes were demonstrated empirically in all age groups. This effect occurred regardless of body mass index, but people with high body weight were more likely to experience weight stigma. For some people with obesity, weight stigma in the pandemic has made activities of daily routine difficult. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that weight stigma in the COVID-19 pandemic occurs in several settings; moreover, although weight discrimination impacts mental health, whether before or during the pandemic, this influence between the pandemic and pre-pandemic scenario is still unclear. Therefore, more research is required in this field while the pandemic lasts, especially with people with obesity. Overall, people with overweight or obesity are more vulnerable to weight stigma than individuals without overweight. In addition, weight stigma refers to discrimination or prejudice based on a person's weight and relates to several consequences, for instance, poor healthcare treatment and mental health problems. In the COVID-19 outbreak, these weight stigma effects tend to become even more critical because they may be associated with unfavourable COVID-19 outcomes and eating disorder risks. Thus, it is crucial to investigate how weight stigma occurs during the pandemic and its impact on health, mainly for the most affected people. We investigated 35 studies published between 2019 and 2021 to map and explore how weight stigma was manifested and the related consequences for people with overweight or obesity in the COVID-19 pandemic. Only about a third of them were quantitative or qualitative, limiting the evidence of weight stigma in the COVID-19 context. The available evidence suggests that weight stigma manifests in several settings such as media, healthcare, public campaigns, and is more common in people with excess weight. However, weight discrimination experiences before or during the pandemic were associated with adverse psychological and behavioural consequences across all age groups, regardless of body weight. For some people with obesity, for instance, weight stigma made it difficult to accomplish their activities of daily routine. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether weight stigma has increased in the pandemic, thus, more studies are required, especially about people with overweight or obesity.

Weight bias among dietitians: does the weight status of the patients change the dietary approaches? / Viés de peso entre os nutricionistas: o status do peso dos pacientes altera as abordagens dietéticas?

ABSTRACT Objective Since obesity is a multifactorial disease, some health professionals may esteem that weight control is a matter of personal willpower and stigmatize individuals. These weight-based attitudes seem quite common even among dietitians. This study aimed to determine whether the level of weight bias affects the dietary approaches of the dietitians. Methods Two hypothetical cases with obese and normal weight vignettes were created to be evaluated, and the explicit weight bias was assessed by the fat phobia scale among 99 dietitians via an online questionnaire. Results The majority of the dietitians demonstrated mild or moderate levels of weight bias (59.6% and 32.3%, respectively). The obese vignette had the highest agreement for nearly all adjectives and was perceived as having poorer diet quality, general health status, and insufficient physical activity level. Conclusion Overall, as weight bias is a concerning issue among most dietitians, necessary steps are required for the reduction of prejudice and thus protect the patients from stigmatizing attitudes.

RESUMO Objetivo Visto que a obesidade é uma doença multifatorial, alguns profissionais de saúde podem defender que o controle de peso é uma questão de força de vontade pessoal e estigmatizam os indivíduos. Essas atitudes baseadas no peso parecem bastante comuns mesmo entre os nutricionistas. Este estudo teve como objetivo determinar se o nível de viés de peso afeta as abordagens dietéticas dos nutricionistas. Métodos Dois casos hipotéticos com vinhetas de obesidade e peso normal foram criados para serem avaliados e o viés de peso explícito foi avaliado pela escala de fobia de gordura Fat Phobia Scale entre 99 nutricionistas por meio de um questionário online. Resultados A maioria dos nutricionistas demonstrou níveis leves ou moderados de viés de peso (59,6% e 32,3%, respectivamente). A vinheta de obesidade teve a maior concordância pela maioria e foi percebida como tendo a pior qualidade da dieta, o pior estado geral de saúde, e níveis de atividade física insuficientes. Conclusão Em suma, sendo esta uma questão que preocupa a maior parte dos nutricionistas e um problema que continua a afetar tantas pessoas, é urgente a criação de medidas que permitam diminuir o preconceito e proteger os pacientes de atitudes estigmatizantes.

El estigma de la obesidad / The stigma of obesity

En este artículo los autores explican la evolución histórica del estigma de la obesidad y las consecuencias de su internalización sobre la salud de las personas que lo sufren. Hacen especial hincapié en las conductas del equipo de salud que refuerzan este estigma, basadas en la gordofobia que también afecta a este colectivo profesional como integrante de nuestra sociedad. Por último, describen algunas iniciativas políticas destinadas a modificar la opresión, la discriminación y la vulneración de los derechos humanos que sufren las personas obesas, como lo son el activismo gordo y una propuesta canadiense para el equipo de salud que pretende ofrecer un marco de atención de las personas con sobrepeso u obesidad orientado a la persona y su entorno, alentándolas a desarrollar autoestima y autoeficacia. (AU)

In this article, the authors explain the historical evolution of the stigma of obesity and the consequences of its internalization on the health of people who suffer from it. They place special emphasis on the behaviors of the health team that reinforce this stigma, based on the fatphobia that also affects this professional group as a member of our society. Finally, they describe some political initiatives aimed at modifying the oppression, discrimination and violation of human rights suffered by obese people, such asfat activismand a Canadian proposal for the health team that aims to offer a framework of carefor overweight or obese people oriented to the person and their environment, encouraging them to develop self-esteemand self-efficacy. (AU)

Anti-fat attitudes of Nutrition undergraduates in Brazil toward individuals with obesity / Atitudes negativas em relação à obesidade por estudantes de Nutrição do Brasil

Abstract Obesity-related prejudice and discrimination may have a source in health professionals and students. The objective was to assess anti-fat attitudes among Brazilian nutrition undergraduates who reported demographic data, weight, height and responded the Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) and the Brazilian Silhouette Scales to assess body image satisfaction and perception. Total and subscales of AFAT scores were compared among categories using the Mann-Whitney U test. Associations of participants' characteristics with the AFAT were analyzed using multiple linear regression. Total AFAT score was positively associated with male sex (ß: .13; p < .001), age (ß: .06; p < .001), educational institution outside capital (ß: .03; p < .05), private institutions (ß: .08; p < .001); and negatively associated with income (ß: -.05; p = .006), participants who perceived themselves with increased BMI (ß: -.15; p < .001) and those at the third year of course (ß: -.05; p = .041). Subscales scores were positively associated with male sex and age; and negatively associated with those who perceived themselves heavier. They have anti-fat attitudes especially if they were man, older, from private institutions, are at the beginning of the course, and have lower household income - and less weight bias if they perceived with increased BMI.

Resumo O preconceito e a discriminação relacionados à obesidade podem vir de profissionais de saúde e estudantes. O objetivo foi avaliar as atitudes negativas em relação à obesidade entre universitários brasileiros de nutrição que relataram dados demográficos, peso, altura e responderam o Antifat Attitudes Test (AFAT) e a Escala de Silhuetas Brasileira para avaliar a satisfação e percepção da imagem corporal. Os escores total e das subescalas da AFAT foram comparados entre as categorias usando o teste U de Mann-Whitney. As associações das características dos participantes com a AFAT foram analisadas por meio de regressão linear múltipla. A pontuação total da AFAT foi positivamente associada ao sexo masculino (ß: 0,13; p < 0,001), idade (ß: 0,06; p < 0,001), instituições de ensino fora da capital (ß: 0,03; p < 0,05) e instituições privadas (ß: 0,08; p < 0,001); e negativamente associada à renda (ß: -0,05; p = 0,006), participantes que se percebiam acima do IMC real (ß: -0,15; p < 0,001) e do terceiro ano do curso (ß: -0,05; p = 0,041). As pontuações das subescalas foram positivamente associadas com sexo masculino e idade; e negativamente associadas com aqueles que se percebiam mais pesados. Os estudantes tinham atitudes antigordura especialmente se eram homens, mais velhos, de instituições privadas, no começo do curso e baixa renda - e menos se percebiam seu IMC maior.

Associations between perceived everyday discrimination, discrimination attributions, and binge eating among Latinas: results from the National Latino and Asian American Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to quantify the association between perceived everyday discrimination and binge eating among Latinas in the United States. METHODS: Participants included 1014 Latinas from the 2002-2003 National Latino and Asian American Study. Modified Poisson models with robust standard errors were used to estimate sociodemographic-adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of binge eating associated with overall and attribution-specific discrimination. RESULTS: Approximately 7% of Latinas reported binge eating. Increased frequency of discrimination was associated with a higher prevalence of binge eating (aPR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.23-2.06), and Latinas reporting frequencies of discrimination in the top tertile had the greatest prevalence elevation (aPR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.32-10.00). There were important differences by discrimination attribution: Latinas experiencing primarily height/weight-based or skin color-based discrimination had the greatest prevalence elevation relative to those reporting no discrimination (aPR, 10.24; 95% CI, 2.95-35.51; and aPR, 8.83; 95% CI, 2.08-37.54, respectively), whereas Latinas reporting primarily race-based discrimination had the lowest prevalence elevation (aPR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.47-5.69). CONCLUSIONS: Discrimination may be an important social determinant of Latinas' binge eating. Future research should incorporate expanded conceptual models that account for Latinas' complex social environment, focusing on intersecting dimensions of identity.