Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Lett Drugs Ther ; 65(1676): 73-80, 2023 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37155255
4.
Adv Ther ; 36(12): 3381-3389, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31602573

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: AG200-15, an investigational transdermal contraceptive delivery system or patch, is designed to be a low-dose, non-daily, combined hormonal contraceptive option for women. In this phase 1 study, the in vivo adhesion of the AG200-15 patch was compared to Xulane®, the only contraceptive patch available in the USA. METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-period crossover adhesion study compared the 7-day adhesion of the AG200-15 and Xulane contraceptive patches. Eighty-three women, ages 18 to 35 years old, with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 19 kg/m2 and < 35 kg/m2, and weight ≥ 48 kg and < 90 kg were enrolled. Trained study site personnel used a five-point scale to assess patch adhesion daily. A score of 0 reflected at least 90% adhesion; while a score of 4 represented complete detachment of the patch. The primary objective was to compare the adhesion properties of the two patches; AG200-15 would be considered statistically non-inferior to Xulane if the upper 95% confidence limit (CL) of the mean difference in adhesion scores was below + 0.15. RESULTS: The overall mean (standard deviation) scores for AG200-15 (N = 78) and Xulane (N = 77) were 0.14 (0.28) and 0.39 (0.40), respectively (lower scores on the adhesion scale indicate better adhesion). The study demonstrated a difference in mean adhesion scores of - 0.24, meeting the prespecified non-inferiority criterion by demonstrating a one-sided upper CL of - 0.16. Thus, the in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 was shown to be non-inferior to that of Xulane. Most subjects experienced no skin irritation at the application site for either patch and no serious adverse event was reported in the study. CONCLUSION: The in vivo adhesion of AG200-15 is non-inferior to that of Xulane on the basis of the prespecified criterion of the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CL for the mean adhesion score difference being below + 0.15. Both patches were generally well tolerated. FUNDING: Agile Therapeutics, Inc.


Subject(s)
Contraceptive Agents/therapeutic use , Ethinyl Estradiol/therapeutic use , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Norgestrel/analogs & derivatives , Administration, Cutaneous , Adolescent , Adult , Body Mass Index , Contraceptive Agents/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Agents/adverse effects , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Combinations , Equivalence Trials as Topic , Ethinyl Estradiol/administration & dosage , Ethinyl Estradiol/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Norgestrel/administration & dosage , Norgestrel/adverse effects , Norgestrel/therapeutic use , Oximes/administration & dosage , Oximes/adverse effects , Oximes/therapeutic use , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL