One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures. METHODS: In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points-the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height-using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods. RESULTS: All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation.

Evaluation of Trigeminocardiac Reflex in Patients Undergoing Elevation of Zygomatic Fractures.

Aim Trigeminocardiac reflex (TCR) manifests as typical hemodynamic perturbations including a sudden lowering of heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), cardiac arrhythmias, and asystole. In literature, TCR has been seen during ocular surgeries, Lefort fractures, and craniofacial surgeries. However, the prevalence of the TCR has not been studied in zygomatic complex fractures . The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of TCR in patients undergoing elevation with/without fixation of zygomatic complex fractures and isolated zygomatic arch fractures under local anesthesia and general anesthesia and to evaluate the prevalence of TCR in different age groups. Materials and methods The study comprised 26 participants diagnosed with zygomatic fractures indicated for surgical intervention. The aim of the study was to find the prevalence of TCR in patients undergoing surgical intervention (elevation of zygomatic complex fractures with/without fixation) under local anesthesia and general anesthesia. The heart rate and blood pressure were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. Results Variation in heart rate was seen in patients undergoing surgery under local anesthesia and general anesthesia. However, a decrease in the heart rate i.e., bradycardia was noted intra-operatively in 75% of the patients operated under local anesthesia. The prevalence of TCR was noted intra-operatively in 23% of cases operated under general anesthesia. No significant changes were seen in the blood pressure of the patients. Conclusion In our study, we found out that the prevalence of TCR was more in the patients operated under local anesthesia i.e., 75% of patients. Out of the patients operated under general anesthesia i.e., 23% of patients showed TCR. No significant variations in blood pressure were observed in patients operated under local anesthesia or general anesthesia. The prevalence of TCR was found more often in the age group of 31-45 years in our study.

Associations between Zygoma Fracture and Post-Traumatic Headache: A Study among Taiwanese Population.

Few studies have discussed the development of post-traumatic headache (PTH) after zygoma fracture. This research aimed to examine the association between zygoma fracture and PTH and its other associated factors. A total of 3043 patients with zygoma fracture and 3043 patients with non-fracture were included in this analysis. They were matched to a non-fracture cohort from the National Health Insurance database according to age, sex, and index year. The incidence of PTH and its association with zygoma fracture were assessed. The zygoma fracture cohort had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of PTH than the non-fracture cohort in a 10-year follow-up. The confounding risk factors of PTH included zygoma fracture, female sex, and comorbidities, including obesity and depression. Female patients under 40 years old who had zygoma fractures had a higher incidence of PTH than the non-fracture group. Moreover, patients with zygoma fractures commonly developed PTH within three months after injury. Female patients under 40 years old with precedent zygoma fractures had a higher incidence rate of PTH than those without fractures. Moreover, patients with zygoma fractures commonly developed PTH within three months after injury. Nevertheless, before widely applying our results, a prospective study must be conducted to verify the risk factors found in this study.

Contemporary Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures.

Zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture is one of the most commonly treated facial fractures. Accurate reduction and stable fixation of the zygoma are required to restore facial symmetry and projection and avoid functional sequalae from changes in orbital volume. Achieving optimal outcome is challenging due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy and limited visualization of all affected articulations of the zygoma. This article provides an updated overview of the evaluation and management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures based on available evidence and clinical experience at our center. The importance of soft tissue management is emphasized, and approaches to internal orbital reconstruction are discussed. While evidence remain limited, intraoperative imaging and navigation may prove to be useful adjuncts in the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary fractures.

Can elective surgery for mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures reduce overall hospital stay without compromising outcomes? Analysis of administrative datasets by the GIRFT programme.

When patients attend the emergency department with facial fractures that require surgery and are immediately admitted, surgery can be delayed as theatre time is prioritised for other more urgent patients. One solution is to send the patient home and admit them as an elective patient at a later date. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients admitted directly and those seen as elective patients following fracture of the mandible or zygomatic complex. Data were taken from the hospital episodes statistics (HES) dataset for 2011-2018, and all hospital admissions for mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures within the National Health Service (NHS) in England were extracted. Patients were categorised as those admitted on attendance at the emergency department and given definitive treatment during the admission, and those not admitted on attendance at the emergency department but discharged home and seen as elective admissions within 30 days of attendance. Data were available for 39 606 patients. For both types of fracture there was substantial variation between NHS trusts in the proportion of patients admitted electively and the proportion admitted directly as emergencies. Elective admission was independently associated with shorter overall stay and lower emergency readmission rates. We found no evidence that delays to definitive surgery through elective admission had a negative impact on emergency readmission rates. Patients admitted electively had a significantly shorter hospital stay.

Titanium Nickelide in Midface Fractures Treatment.

BACKGROUND: The question of reconstruction of human tissues and organs with the use of medical materials is still open, because of the accurate requirements for their biological and physical features. The aim of this study was to prove the efficiency of titanium nickelide constructors in treatment of isolated orbital floor fractures or combination with zygomatico-orbital complex fractures. METHODS: Patients with a fracture of zygomatico-orbital complex and/or low orbital floor (n = 44) carried out different treatments: in the first group, osteosynthesis and endoprosthesis with titanium nickelide structures; in the second group, titan mini-plates osteosynthesis; in the third group ('blow-out'), endoprosthesis with a titanium nickelide mesh; and in the fourth group ('blow-out'), conservative treatment and monitoring (archive data) (p > 0.05). The paraesthesia, diplopia, enophthalmos and exophthalmos degree were measured in points. RESULTS: In one year, the first and second groups had no differences in level of paraesthesia (p > 0.05). The absence of exophthalmos and differences between first and second groups, and between the third and the fourth groups with positive dynamics inside the groups were proved (p < 0.05). In the first and third groups, enophthalmos was absent, and it increased in the second and fourth groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.11). Diplopia in the first and third groups was absent, and it increased in the second and fourth groups (p < 0.05, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The elasticity and biocompatibility of titanium nickelide make the implant insertion and restoration of the lower orbital wall anatomy easier, with good postoperative clinical results.

Facial Fractures and the National Basketball Association: Epidemiology and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify the epidemiology and impact of facial fractures on player performance and return to play (RTP) in the National Basketball Association (NBA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control series METHODS: Fifty-three NBA players who sustained facial fractures between 1984 and 2018 were identified. Players with pre- and postinjury statistics were included in the performance analysis. A control group was matched by age, body mass index (BMI), position, NBA experience, and player efficiency rating. Fisher exact tests and Student t tests were performed to analyze player demographics and performance variables. RESULTS: At the time of injury, the average player's age was 26.17 years, BMI was 24.80 kg/m2 , and NBA experience was 4.97 years. Players missed an average of 3.77 games and 18.21 days prior to RTP. Forty-eight players (90.6%) did RTP the subsequent season, whereas 43 of those players (81.1%) met inclusion criteria for performance analysis. There was no significant change in performance between pre- and postinjury seasons. Players managed operatively missed significantly more games (8.15 vs. 1.85; P = .034) and days (51.08 vs. 5.53; P = .003) than players managed nonoperatively, whereas performance was not impacted. Average career length following facial fracture was significantly shorter compared to controls (5.14 vs. 6.42 years; P = .010) and a decrease in three-pointer percentage (P = .004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of players who suffer facial fractures RTP in the NBA and do not experience significant decline in performance following injury. These results should aid physicians caring for basketball players at any level, and may help inform future guidelines for treatment and injury prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b Laryngoscope, 2020.

Surgical treatment of isolated zygomatic fracture: Outcome comparison between titanium plate and bioabsorbable plate.

BACKGROUND: Zygoma fracture is of clinical importance because malar prominence plays an essential role in facial appearance. Traditionally, most maxillofacial surgeons perform osteosynthesis with titanium plates and screws for rigid fixation. However, this procedure has certain disadvantages that include the possibility of implant exposure, palpability or loosening of the screws, painful irritation, temperature sensitization, and radiographic artifacts. In this study, we compared the function and satisfaction outcome between Bonamates® bioabsorbable implant and Leibinger titanium implant. METHOD: Consecutively 53 patients with isolated unilateral zygomatic fracture that were treated with the Bonamates® bioabsorbable plate system, n = 53 were compared to patients with the titanium plate system, n = 55 in the period between 2009 and 2013. All patients were followed-up at least 6 months. Preoperative and postoperative facial computed tomography (CT) scans were performed and scored from 0 to 2 in the 5 areas of zygoma. A score of 2 indicated the most severely displaced fracture in one of the areas. A visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 was used to assess the postoperative aesthetic and functional satisfactions. RESULT: The mean ages of the patients in the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 33 years and 30 years, respectively. The male to female ratios were 1.2:1 (bioabsorbable plate group) and 1.1:1 (titanium plate group). The average preoperative CT scan scores of the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 5.7 and 5.1, respectively. The postoperative CT scan scores of the bioabsorbable and titanium plate groups were 1.3 and 1.1, respectively. The implant cost of the bioabsorbable group was approximately 6-fold higher than that of the titanium plate group. The complication rate was similar in both groups and included complications such as palpable implant, skin irritation, and hypersensitive cheek. The patients in both groups attained similar mouth-opening function and a satisfactory score at 6 months after operation. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the bioabsorbable plate outcome was similar to the titanium plate outcome for patients with isolated unilateral zygomatic fracture. The bioabsorbable implant system provides another option for internal fixation devices in the treatment of zygomatic fractures and avoids implant removal surgery; however, the implant cost of bioabsorbable plates is higher than that of titanium plates in Taiwan.

Maxillofacial and Mandibular Fractures in Sports.

Sports account for 3% to 29% of facial injuries and 10% to 42% of facial fractures. Fractures of the facial skeleton most commonly occur owing to interpersonal violence or motor vehicle crashes. Facial fractures from sporting activities has clearly decreased over time owing to better preventive measures. However, this decreasing trend is offset by the emergence of more dangerous sports activities, or "pushing the envelope" of traditional sports activities. Fractures can occur from contact between athletes, and between athletes and their surroundings. Football, soccer, hockey, and baseball most frequently are involved in sports-related cases of facial bone fracture.

Acute Intraorbital Hemorrhage following Reduction of a Displaced Orbitozygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture.

Orbitozygomaticomaxillary complex (OZMC) fractures are commonly encountered by the craniomaxillofacial trauma surgeon and may, in fact, be the most common type of orbital fracture. Disruption of articulation with the frontal and sphenoid bones causes disruption of the internal orbital skeleton, which can result in diplopia from extraocular muscle swelling or entrapment, or enophthalmos from increased orbital volume. Although there is significant energy transferred to the orbit in these injuries, blindness and intraorbital hematoma are, fortunately, relatively rare complications, typically seen pre- or postoperatively. In this report, we describe the development of acute intraorbital hemorrhage following reduction of a displaced OZMC fracture.

Extra-articular ankylosis after zygoma fracture; A case report & review of literature.

Extra-articular temporomandibular bony ankylosis between the coronoid process and the zygoma is quite uncommon. In this paper we present a case of fusion of the left coronoid to the zygomatic bone in a 23-year-old male. This bony ankylosis was the result of five-week-old untreated zygomatic complex fracture. Ankylosis developed secondary to heterotopic bone formation following trauma. Zygomatico-coronoid ankylosis of the mandible is a complication which rarely occurs if fractures of the middle third of the facial skeleton have been adequately treated. The patient was treated by intraoral coronoidectomy. The rationale for clinical and radiographic diagnosis and treatment is reviewed.

Ratio of Simple versus Comminuted Lateral Wall Fractures of the Orbit.

Reduction of a fracture may be relatively easy with a simple, noncomminuted fracture along the zygomaticofrontal suture, zygomaticomaxillary buttress, or the inferior rim of the orbit. When one or more of these key landmarks is comminuted, it becomes more important to confirm that the fracture commonly seen between the greater wing of the sphenoid and the zygoma is properly repositioned. The zygomaticosphenoidal suture is an excellent landmark with a simple lateral orbital wall fracture (LOWF), but it may not be reliable in patients with a comminuted fracture. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency that the lateral orbital wall (LOW) is a reliable landmark in the reduction of a zygoma fracture by determining the ratio between simple versus comminuted LOWF. To identify 100 patients with a LOWF, the authors reviewed consecutive midface computed tomography images of 877 patients performed over a 25-month period from one of our city's primary Level I trauma and teaching hospitals. A total of 121 LOWF were identified in 100 patients. In 60.3% of cases the facture was a simple, noncomminuted LOWF. In 39.7% of cases the fracture was comminuted (p = 0.023). Simple LOWF are significantly more common than comminuted fractures. In 39.7% of fractures the LOW is comminuted. This suggests that there are many fractures in which other modalities may be much more important to use to confirm the proper reduction of the zygoma.

Clinical Manifestations, Management, and Ophthalmologic Complications of Orbital Roof Fractures and Zygoma Fractures

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical manifestations, management, and ophthalmologic complications of orbital roof fractures and zygoma fractures. METHODS: A retrospective survey of 119 patients who visited Korea University Medical Center from June 2009 to June 2010 was performed. The sex, age, causes, fracture characteristics, neurologic injury, ocular injury, and combined facial bone fractures of patients who were diagnosed with orbital roof fracture and zygoma fracture were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients with orbital roof fracture was 33.0 years old. The most common cause of orbital roof fracture was traffic accident (36.1%) with 6 patients receiveing surgical treatement (9.8%). Among the ophthalmologic diagnoses of the patients with orbital roof fracture, traumatic iridocyclitis was the most common (7 eyes) followed by eyeball rupture (2 eyes). The mean age of patients with zygoma fracture was 36.6 years old. The most common cause of zygoma fracture was traffic accident (32.8%), with 51 patients receiving surgical treatement (87.9%). Among the ophthalmologic diagnoses of the patients with zygoma fracture, traumatic iridocyclitis was the most common (6 eyes), followed by commotio retina (4 eyes). CONCLUSIONS: The present study regarding clinical characteristics and treatment of orbital roof fracture and zygoma fracture is helpful for ophthalmologists regarding the treatment of accompanying ophthalmologic complications.

Simultaneous Reduction of Contralateral Malar Complex in Cases of Unilateral Zygoma Bone Fracture

PURPOSE: Reduction by simply assembling bones is recognized as treatment for a zygoma fracture. However, in patients who originally had a protruding zygoma, the fractured parts look like malarplasty after the edema subsides, giving a soft impression which patients notice. Thus, we created symmetry through simultaneous contralateral malar reduction in a unilateral zygoma fracture. METHODS: In this study, the patients who had surgery between July, 2008 and December, 2009 with admission were object. In 76 patients with a zygoma fracture, the patients with bilateral zygoma fractures were excluded. Among 48 patients who had a reduction only after a unilateral zygoma fracture, the patients hoping for a reduction of their rough protruding zygoma were analyzed with front cephalometry. The study progressed on 22 patients who had simultaneous contralateral malar reduction in a unilateral zygoma fracture with consent. After fixing the fracture, we did a straight zygoma osteotomy through a 1.5cm intraoral incision. After that, we created symmetry with a special ruler and fixed the broken zygomatic arch with a screw and plate. We evaluated the facial index and satisfaction with a statistical analysis before and after the surgery. RESULTS: In 22 patients, there was no reoperation except for 1 patient who had a zygoma fracture. None of the patients were treated for infection or hematoma. Two patients complained of paresthesia after the malar reduction operation, but this subsided in 4 months. Most of them were satisfied with the malar reduction, especially the women, and we obtained a better mid facial contour with decreased facial width(p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Existing zygoma fracture surgery focuses on anatomical reduction. However, we need to have a cosmetic viewpoint in fractures as interests of face contour arise. Thus, contralateral malar reduction got a 4.7 (range 0~5) from patients who had malar reduction surgery in our hospital. Although adjusting to all zygoma fractures has limitations, it can be a new method in zygoma fractures when there are limited indications of protruding zygoma and careful attention is given to patients' high demands.

A Survey of Patient Satisfaction after Treating Zygomatic Complex Fractures Using a Coronal Approach

PURPOSE: It is difficult to objectively evaluate the outcomes of plastic surgical procedures. The combination of aesthetic and medical factors makes outcome quantification difficult. In this study, fracture reduction accuracy was objectively evaluated in patients with zygomatic complex fractures. Patients satisfaction with the accuracy was also examined. In addition, the patients' overall satisfaction and discomfort due to complications were analyzed. METHODS: Eighty-five patients who had surgeries via bicoronal incision for zygomatic complex fracture from March 2006 to December 2009 were included in this study. Two plastic surgeons evaluated the accuracy of the fracture reduction with postoperative computed tomography. A survey questionnaire was administered to evaluate the patients' overall satisfaction and the impact of symptoms associated with the procedure on the patients' daily lives. RESULTS: The overall patient satisfaction rate was 82.1 +/- 10.9% (range, 45~100%). The level of deformation was 6.7 +/- 10.9%, the levels of discomfort in daily life due to pain, paresthesia, scar, and facial palsy were 8.5 +/- 13.2%, 5.8 +/- 8.9%, 4.4 +/- 9.9%, and 1.9 +/- 9.2%, respectively. According to the visual analogue scale, paresthesia was found to be the most frequent symptom (43.5%), and pain was the most troublesome symptom. CONCLUSION: The use of bicoronal incision for treating zygomatic complex fractures can cause various complications due to wide incision and dissection. However, this technique can provide optimized reduction and rigid fixation. Most of these postoperative complications can cause significant discomfort in the patient. It is thought that the use of correct surgical technique and the accurate knowledge of craniofacial anatomy will result in a reduction of complications and significantly increase patient satisfaction.

Quantitative Analysis of the Orbital Volume Change in Isolated Zygoma Fracture

PURPOSE: The zygoma(Zygomaticomaxillary) complexes make up a large portion of the orbital floor and lateral orbital walls. Zygoma fracture frequently causes the posteromedial displacement of bone fragments, and the collapse or overlapping of internal orbital walls. This process consequently can lead to the orbital volume change. The reduction of zygoma in an anterolateral direction may influence on the potential bone defect area of the internal orbital walls. Thus we performed the quantitative analysis of orbital volume change in zygoma fracture before and after operation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography scans in 39 patients with zygoma fractures who had not carried out orbital wall reconstruction. Orbital volume measurement was obtained through Aquarius Ver. 4.3.6 program and we compared the orbital volume change of injured orbit with that of the normal contralateral orbit. RESULTS: The average orbital volume of normal orbit was 19.68cm3. Before the operation, the average orbital volume of injured orbit was 18.42cm3. The difference of the orbital volume between the injured orbit and the normal orbit was 1.18cm3(6.01%) on average. After operation, the average orbital volume of injured orbit was 20.81cm3. The difference of the orbital volume between the injured orbit and the normal orbit was 1.17cm3(5.92%) on average. CONCLUSION: There are considerable volume changes in zygoma fracture which did not accompany internal orbital wall fracture before and after operation. Our study reflects the change of bony frame, also that of all parts of the orbital wall, in addition to the bony defect area of orbital floor, in an isolated zygoma fracture so that it evaluates orbital volume change more accurately. Thus, the measurement of orbital volume in isolated zygoma fractures helps predict the degree of enophthalmos and decide a surgical plan.

Open Reduction and Non-fixation Method for the Zygoma Body Fracture

PURPOSE: Zygoma is a major portion of the midfacial skeleton, forms the malar prominence and the three adjacent bony articulations. Zygoma fracture is a very common in facial trauma. Open reduction and rigid fixation of displaced zygoma fractures are necessary to avoid immediate and delayed facial asymmetry and depression. However, it is possible to happen the complications related to the plates and screws. So, we planned to treat the 24 patients of Group II, III, IV zygoma fractures with precise reduction and non-fixation method via intraoral approach. METHODS: From August, 2006, to August, 2009, we treated 24 cases of zygoma fracture with reduction and non-fixation methods. Before the surgery, we choose the patients who could be treated with this method among the Group II, III, IV patients. RESULTS: No patients in this study had postoperative complications such as displacement of bony fragments, facial depression and asymmetry, malocclusion, hypoesthesia. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional results can be obtained. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of the zygoma fracture, it is possible to treat with precise reduction and non-fixation method. The greatest advantage is to decrease the operative time, no need to wide dissection, no complications related to the plates and screws. For the using of this method, it is necessary to choose the adequate patients through the preoperative planning.

Open Reduction and Non-fixation Method for the Zygoma Body Fracture

PURPOSE: Zygoma is a major portion of the midfacial skeleton, forms the malar prominence and the three adjacent bony articulations. Zygoma fracture is a very common in facial trauma. Open reduction and rigid fixation of displaced zygoma fractures are necessary to avoid immediate and delayed facial asymmetry and depression. However, it is possible to happen the complications related to the plates and screws. So, we planned to treat the 24 patients of Group II, III, IV zygoma fractures with precise reduction and non-fixation method via intraoral approach. METHODS: From August, 2006, to August, 2009, we treated 24 cases of zygoma fracture with reduction and non-fixation methods. Before the surgery, we choose the patients who could be treated with this method among the Group II, III, IV patients. RESULTS: No patients in this study had postoperative complications such as displacement of bony fragments, facial depression and asymmetry, malocclusion, hypoesthesia. Satisfactory aesthetic and functional results can be obtained. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of the zygoma fracture, it is possible to treat with precise reduction and non-fixation method. The greatest advantage is to decrease the operative time, no need to wide dissection, no complications related to the plates and screws. For the using of this method, it is necessary to choose the adequate patients through the preoperative planning.

The Signficance of Intraoperative Radiograph in Treatment of Zygoma Fracture

PURPOSE: The surgical treatment of zygoma fracture use generally three point fixation of the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital rim and zygomaticomaxillary buttress. But, this procedure has the disadvantage that we cannot know symmetry of the zygoma and visualize the reduction of the zygomatic arch. So, we take a intraoperative simple radiograph(zygomatic arch view) in reduction of zygoma fracture. METHODS: From 2004 to 2006, We compared 21 patients with taking a intraoperative simple radiograph and 28 patients with not taking a radiograph. To assess the difference between the two groups, the authors compared the patients' subjective symptoms and measured the axial angle of the zygoma and zygomatic arch and the degree of the zygomatic arch inclination on zygomatic arch view. And we compared intraoperative simple radiograph with postoperative facial bone CT scan. RESULTS: There was significant difference in appearance of subjective symptoms and the degree of zygomatic arch inclination representing the local contour of fractured zygomatic arch. And intraoperative simple radiograph is accorded with the postoperative facial bone CT scan. CONCLUSION: We think that taking a intraoperative simple radiograph in the treatment of zygoma fracture is satis-factory methods in cosmetics and accuracy of reduction.

The Operation of Facial Bone Fractures

Plastic surgeons who perform reconstructive surgery of facial injuries have a dual responsibility: repair of the aesthetic defect and restoration of the function. The third goal is to minimize the period of disability. although emergent situations are limited in facial injuries, I would like to emphasize the advantages of prompt definitive reconstruction of the injuries and the contribution of early operative intervention to the superior aesthetic and functional outcomes. Socioeconomic and psychological factors make it imperative that an aggressive, expedient, and wellplanned surgical program be outlined, operated, and maintained to rehabilitate the patient to return to his or her active and productive life as soon as possible while minimizing aesthetic and functional disabilities. Teaching points: the techniques of extended open reduction and immediate repair or replacement of bone and microvascular tissue transfer of bone or soft tissue have made extensive and challenging injuries manageable. The principle of immediate skeletal stabilization in anatomic position has been enhanced by the use of rigid fixation and the application of craniofacial techniques that is safer and less traumatic for facial bone exposure. In this article, I will present mandibular fracture, orbital wall fracture and maxillar fracture, which are commonly encountered facial bone injuries. We can improve both the functional and aesthetic outcomes of facial fracture treatment when we manage the patients with the current concept of craniofacial techniques based on precise anatomic knowledge.