Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Acta Ortop Mex ; 32(2): 60-64, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30182549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult degenerative scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional rotational deformity, in a previously straight spine, resulting in sagittal and axial disbalance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study presents the casuistry of patients 40 to 80 years old with adult degenerative scoliosis who underwent surgery in a referral institute from January 1994 to December 2013. RESULTS: The prevalence was 0.087% (CI 95% 67.8-111), with a median age of 64.9 ± 9.4 years old, increased frequency in women and older adults. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis associated with degenerative scoliosis was 21%. The estimated risk for scoliosis in women was OR = 2.37 (CI 95% 1.35-4.15), while men showed OR = 0.4 (CI95% 0.24-0.73). The risk for spondylolisthesis associated to degenerative scoliosis was in men OR = 1.87. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence in our experience is low and the sample age was higher; while gender, severity of the curve and presence of spondylolisthesis and olistesis were similar to the reviewed literature.


ANTECEDENTES: La escoliosis degenerativa del adulto es una deformidad rotacional tridimensional compleja, en una columna recta previamente, dando por resultado desequilibrio sagital y axial. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Este estudio retrospectivo presenta la casuística de los pacientes de 40 a 80 años de edad con escoliosis degenerativa del adulto que experimentaron la cirugía en un instituto de referencia desde enero de 1994 a diciembre de 2013. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia fue de 0.087% (IC 95% 67.8-111), con una edad media de 64.9 ± 9.4 años, mayor frecuencia en mujeres y adultos mayores. La prevalencia de la espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue de 21%. El riesgo estimado para la escoliosis en las mujeres fue = 2.37 (IC 95% 1.35-4.15), mientras que los hombres mostraron OR = 0.4 (IC95% 0.24-0.73). El riesgo de espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue en hombres OR = 1.87. CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia en nuestra experiencia es baja y la edad de la muestra fue mayor; mientras que el género, la gravedad de la curva y la presencia de espondilolistesis y olistesis eran similares a la literatura consultada.


Subject(s)
Referral and Consultation , Scoliosis , Spondylolisthesis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/surgery , Spondylolisthesis/surgery
2.
Acta ortop. mex ; 32(2): 60-64, mar.-abr. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1019331

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Background: Adult degenerative scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional rotational deformity, in a previously straight spine, resulting in sagittal and axial disbalance. Material and methods: This retrospective study presents the casuistry of patients 40 to 80 years old with adult degenerative scoliosis who underwent surgery in a referral institute from January 1994 to December 2013. Results: The prevalence was 0.087% (CI 95% 67.8-111), with a median age of 64.9 ± 9.4 years old, increased frequency in women and older adults. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis associated with degenerative scoliosis was 21%. The estimated risk for scoliosis in women was OR = 2.37 (CI 95% 1.35-4.15), while men showed OR = 0.4 (CI95% 0.24-0.73). The risk for spondylolisthesis associated to degenerative scoliosis was in men OR = 1.87. Conclusions: The prevalence in our experience is low and the sample age was higher; while gender, severity of the curve and presence of spondylolisthesis and olistesis were similar to the reviewed literature.


Resumen: Antecedentes: La escoliosis degenerativa del adulto es una deformidad rotacional tridimensional compleja, en una columna recta previamente, dando por resultado desequilibrio sagital y axial. Material y métodos: Este estudio retrospectivo presenta la casuística de los pacientes de 40 a 80 años de edad con escoliosis degenerativa del adulto que experimentaron la cirugía en un instituto de referencia desde enero de 1994 a diciembre de 2013. Resultados: La prevalencia fue de 0.087% (IC 95% 67.8-111), con una edad media de 64.9 ± 9.4 años, mayor frecuencia en mujeres y adultos mayores. La prevalencia de la espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue de 21%. El riesgo estimado para la escoliosis en las mujeres fue = 2.37 (IC 95% 1.35-4.15), mientras que los hombres mostraron OR = 0.4 (IC95% 0.24-0.73). El riesgo de espondilolistesis asociada a escoliosis degenerativa fue en hombres OR = 1.87. Conclusiones: La prevalencia en nuestra experiencia es baja y la edad de la muestra fue mayor; mientras que el género, la gravedad de la curva y la presencia de espondilolistesis y olistesis eran similares a la literatura consultada.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Referral and Consultation , Scoliosis/surgery , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Lumbar Vertebrae , Middle Aged
3.
Rev. bras. pesqui. méd. biol ; Braz. j. med. biol. res;51(4): e6651, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889066

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of upper thoracic (UT) versus lower thoracic (LT) upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) for adult scoliosis by meta-analysis. We conducted a literature search in three databases to retrieve related studies up to March 15, 2017. The preliminary screened studies were assessed by two reviewers according to the selection criteria. All analyses were carried out using the statistical software package R version 2.31. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the results. The I2 statistic and Q statistic test were used for heterogeneity assessment. Egger's test was performed to detect publication bias. To assess the effect of each study on the overall pooled OR or standardized mean difference (SMD), sensitive analysis was conducted. Ten trials published between 2007 and 2015 were eligible and included in our study. Meta-analysis revealed that the UT group was associated with more blood loss (SMD=0.4779, 95%CI=0.3349-0.6209, Z=6.55, P<0.0001) and longer operating time (SMD=0.5780, 95%CI=0.1971-0.958, Z=2.97, P=0.0029) than the LT group. However, there was no significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) function subscores, radiographic outcomes including sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis, length of hospital stay, and revision rates between the two groups. No evidence of publication bias was found between the two groups. Fusion from the lower thoracic spine (below T10) has as advantages a shorter operation time and less blood loss than upper thoracic spine (above T10) in posterior long-segment fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Evidence-Based Medicine , Follow-Up Studies , Publication Bias , Retrospective Studies
4.
Rev. Asoc. Argent. Ortop. Traumatol ; 78(4): 210-216, dic. 2013. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | BINACIS | ID: bin-130210

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La fotografía digital de radiografías puede generar distorsiones angulares en las imágenes. No está publicado si estas alteraciones pueden afectar las mediciones de los ángulos de Cobb. Objetivo: Evaluar la reproducibilidad del ángulo de Cobb con la fotografía digital de espinogramas de 30 x 90 cm en escoliosis del adulto. Materiales y Métodos: Se eligieron al azar 20 espinogramas preoperatorios de pacientes con escoliosis del adulto para evaluar prospectivamente. Los espinogramas fueron escaneados y sus imágenes digitales se consideraron como controles. Se analizó la discrepancia intraobservador, interobservador, intercámara e intracámara, con tres cámaras digitales y dos observadores que realizaron ocho sesiones fotográficas a cada espinograma. Se midieron los ángulos con Adobe Photoshop« sobre las imágenes digitales y se los analizó con el coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Resultados: El promedio de los ángulos de Cobb torácicos y lumbares del escáner, las cámaras 1, 2 y 3 fue de 37,9; 37,8; 37,7; 37,5; 53,2; 53,1; 53,3; 52,9, respectivamente. La correlación interobservador e intraobservador fue extremadamente alta, así como entre las cámaras y el escáner. Conclusión: El ángulo de Cobb se puede medir luego de la fotografía digital de espinogramas de 30 x 90 cm, con alta reproducibilidad entre diferentes cámaras y observadores.(AU)


Background: Digital photography to radiographs can generate angular distortions to the images. It is not published if these distortions can affect the lines used for Cobb measurements in routine practice. Objective: To analyze reliability for coronal Cobb angle measurements of digitally acquired photograph to the 30 x 90 cm plain films in adult scoliosis. Methods: Twenty anteroposterior long-cassette scoliosis radiographs from adult patients who were operated on in one institution were randomly selected and prospectively studied. The endplates of the curves were selected and marked by one observer. The radiographs were scanned and the digital images were used as controls. The variability of the measurements was evaluated with three digital cameras and two observers making eight photographic sessions to each long-film. Over the digital images the Cobb angles were measured using Adobe Photoshop« and they were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The overall mean thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles for the scanned, camera 1, 2 and 3 were 37.9, 37.8, 37.7, 37.5, 53.2, 53.1, 53.3, 52.9, respectively. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement was extremely high, as well as across cameras and scanner. Conclusion: The Cobb angle can be measured after digitally photographed films with high reliability among different cameras and observers.(AU)

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL