Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 80
Filter
1.
Environ Pollut ; 357: 124425, 2024 Jun 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914196

ABSTRACT

This study analyzed pollutant emissions from laser cutters used in modeling in a laboratory, which can have harmful effects on indoor air quality and health. Four conditions were tested: material thickness, laser cutter strength, minimum strength per thickness, and air purifier level. Four pollutants were analyzed: PM2.5, HCHO, VOCs, and CO2. The study found that the emissions of PM2.5, HCHO, and VOCs increased with paperboard thickness, while CO2 emissions were not significant. PM2.5 was more affected by laser cutting strength, while HCHO and VOCs were more affected by paperboard thickness. Additionally, we analyzed the PM2.5 emission rates based on the thickness of the paperboard and the laser cutting strength. Therefore, emission rates based on thickness and laser cutting strength ranged from 7275 to 18,783 µg/min. The air purifier significantly reduced PM2.5 but not HCHO and VOCs. To reduce these gaseous pollutants, combining mechanical ventilation or using an air purifier with a filter that adsorbs HCHO and VOCs is effective. This study highlights the importance of considering laser cutters as a potential source of indoor air pollutants and implementing measures to mitigate their harmful effects.

2.
Allergol Select ; 8: 70-77, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549812

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluation of a new individual wearable air purifier (Respiray Wear A+) for birch pollen, house dust mite (HDM), and cat-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) patients in a standardized allergen exposure chamber (AEC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible allergic patients were exposed to birch pollen, HDM raw material, and cat allergen in an AEC for 60 minutes without (V1) and with (V3) the use of the Respiray device. Nasal, ocular, bronchial, and other symptoms were rated by the patients every 10 minutes, and their wellbeing, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), and lung function parameters were assessed every 30 minutes. The primary endpoint was the change in the median of the total symptom score (TSS) at V3 compared to V1 at 60 minutes of exposure. The secondary endpoints consisted of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and total eye symptom score (TESS). RESULTS: 23 patients with birch pollen allergy, 37 patients with HDM allergy, and 41 patients with cat allergy were included in the analysis. Significant reduced symptom scores of ~ 49% were observed when using Respiray Wea A+ under birch pollen exposure (p < 0.05) in the primary endpoint TSS (V3 2.43 compared to V1 4.78). An 48% reduction of symptoms was seen in TSS in case of HDM exposure (V3 3.59; V1 6.92, (t-test: p < 0.01)) and the highest reduction of TSS (60%) under Respiray A+ using cat allergens (V3 2.95, V1 7.44, (t-test p < 0.01) after 60 minutes of exposure. The personal wellbeing revealed clinically meaningful improvements over time in all three studies which manifested in a lower symptom increase during the final allergen exposures. CONCLUSION: The individual wearable air purifier Respiray Wear A+ protects significantly against airborne pollen, HDM, and cat allergens and may be a very useful device for avoiding indoor allergens in a new way.

4.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 199, 2024 Feb 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has raised awareness of the importance of air quality. This pilot study arose from the need to reduce the concentration of particulate matter in the dental office during orthodontic procedures. To evaluate the efficacy of using an air purifier during orthodontic care in the dental office to reduce the concentration of ambient particulate matter. RESULTS: Significant reductions in particle numbers were obtained for all particle sizes except the largest particles counted (10 µm) through use of the air filter. A marked association between higher humidity levels and higher particle counts was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Using an air purifier during dental care achieves a significant reduction in the concentration of ambient particles in the dental office. There is a correlation between higher relative humidity and higher particle concentration. The probability of obtaining a maximum particulate concentration level of 0.3 and 0.5 µm is 1000 times lower when using an air purifier.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Air Pollutants , Humans , Air Pollutants/analysis , Pilot Projects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Particle Size
5.
Environ Res ; 247: 118284, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253196

ABSTRACT

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a leading environmental risk factor globally, and over half of the associated disease burden are caused by cardiovascular disease. Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the short-term cardiovascular benefits of indoor air purifiers (IAPs), but major knowledge gaps remain on their longer-term benefits. In this 1-year, randomized, double-blinded, parallel controlled trial of 47 elderly (ntrue-purification = 24; nsham-purification = 23) aged ≥70 years, true-purification reduced household PM2.5 levels by 28% and maintained lower exposure throughout the year compared to the sham-purification group. After 12 months of intervention, a significant reduction of diastolic blood pressure was found in the true-purification versus sham-purification group (-4.62 [95% CI: -7.28, -1.96] mmHg) compared to baseline measurement prior to the intervention, whereas systolic blood pressure showed directionally consistent but statistically non-significant effect (-2.49 [95% CI: -9.25, 4.28] mmHg). Qualitatively similar patterns of associations were observed for pulse pressure (-2.30 [95% CI: -6.57, 1.96] mmHg) and carotid intima-media thickness (-10.0% [95% CI: -24.8%, 4.7%]), but these were not statistically significant. Overall, we found suggestive evidence of cardiovascular benefits of long-term IAPs use, particularly on diastolic blood pressure. Evidence on other longer-term cardiovascular traits is less clear. Further trials with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are needed across diverse populations to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of IAPs.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Air Pollution , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cardiovascular System , Aged , Humans , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Hong Kong , Particulate Matter/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Air Pollutants/analysis , Air Pollution/analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Sci Total Environ ; 874: 162516, 2023 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36868269

ABSTRACT

The use of indoor air purifier (IAP) has received growing attention as a mitigation strategy for reducing indoor air pollution, but the evidence on their cardiovascular benefits is unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether the use of IAP can reduce the adverse effects of indoor particulate matter (PM) on cardiovascular health among young healthy population. A randomized, double-blind, cross-over, IAP intervention of 38 college students was conducted. The participants were assigned into two groups to receive the true and sham IAPs for 36 h in random order. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP; DBP), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate variability (HRV) and indoor size-fractioned particulate matter (PM) were real-time monitored throughout the intervention. We found that IAP could reduce indoor PM by 41.7-50.5 %. Using IAP was significantly associated with a reduction of 2.96 mmHg (95 % CI: -5.71, -0.20) in SBP. Increased PM was significantly associated with increased SBP (e.g., 2.17 mmHg [0.53, 3.81], 1.73 mmHg [0.32, 3.14] and 1.51 mmHg [0.28, 2.75] for an IQR increment of PM1 [16.7 µg/m3], PM2.5 [20.6 µg/m3] and PM10 [37.9 µg/m3] at lag 0-2 h, respectively) and decreased SpO2 (-0.44 % [-0.57, -0.29], -0.41 % [-0.53, -0.30] and - 0.40 % [-0.51, -0.30] for PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 at lag 0-1 h, respectively), which could last for about 2 h. Using IAPs could halve indoor PM levels, even in relatively low air pollution settings. The exposure-response relationships suggested that the benefits of IAPs on BP may only be observed when indoor PM exposure is reduced to a certain level.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Air Pollution , Humans , Young Adult , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Heart Rate , Blood Pressure , Oxygen Saturation , Air Pollution/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis
7.
Environ Res ; 229: 115708, 2023 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36940818

ABSTRACT

Evidence supporting the effect of individual protective measures (IPMs) on air pollution is relatively scarce. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effects of air purifiers, air-purifying respirators, and cookstove changes on cardiopulmonary health outcomes. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until December 31, 2022, 90 articles and 39,760 participants were included. Two authors independently searched and selected the studies, extracted information, and assessed each study's quality and risk of bias. We performed meta-analyses when three or more studies were available for each IPMs, with comparable intervention and health outcome. Systematic review showed that IPMs were beneficial in children and elderly with asthma along with healthy individuals. Meta-analysis results showed a reduction in cardiopulmonary inflammation using air purifiers than in control groups (with sham/no filter) with a decrease in interleukin 6 by -0.247 µg/mL (95% confidence intervals [CI] = -0.413, -0.082). A sub-group analysis for air purifier as an IPMs in developing counties reduced fractional exhaled nitric oxide by -0.208 ppb (95% confidence intervals [CI] = -0.394, -0.022). However, evidence describing the effects of air purifying respirator and cook stove changes on cardiopulmonary outcomes remained insufficient. Therefore, air purifiers can serve as efficient IPMs against air pollution. The beneficial effect of air purifiers is likely to have a greater effect in developing countries than in developed countries.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution , Asthma , Child , Humans , Aged , Air Pollution/analysis , Household Products/analysis , Cooking , Health Status
8.
Build Environ ; 234: 110136, 2023 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852256

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which emerged in 2019, has induced worldwide chaos. The main cause of COVID-19 mass infection indoors is the spread of virus-containing droplets via indoor airflow, which is affected by air conditioners and purifiers. Here, ten experimental cases were established to analyze how use of air purifiers affects the spread of virus-containing droplets. The experiments were conducted in a school classroom with an air conditioner in summer. In the droplet dispersion experiment, paraffin oil was used as the droplet substance. Two main scenarios were simulated: (1) an infected student was seated in the back of the classroom; and (2) the teacher, standing in the front of the classroom, was infected. The results were expressed using two parameters: peak concentration and loss rate, which reflect the degree of direct and indirect infection (airborne infection), respectively. The air purifier induced a peak concentration decrease of 42% or an increase of 278%, depending on its location in the classroom. Conversely, when the air purifier was operated in the high mode (flow rate = 500 CMH; cubic meters per hour), the loss rate showed that the amount of droplet nuclei only decreased by 39% and the droplet amount decreased by 22%. Thus, the airborne infection degree can be significantly reduced. Finally, the use of air purifiers in the summer may be helpful in preventing group infections by reducing the loss rate and peak concentration if the air purifier is placed in a strategic location, according to the airflow of the corresponding room.

9.
Sci Total Environ ; 863: 160973, 2023 Mar 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539092

ABSTRACT

Desert dust storms (DDS) are natural events that impact not only populations close to the emission sources but also populations many kilometers away. Countries located across the main dust sources, including countries in the Eastern Mediterranean, are highly affected by DDS. In addition, climate change is expanding arid areas exacerbating DDS events. Currently, there are no intervention measures with proven, quantified exposure reduction to desert dust particles. As part of the wider "MEDEA" project, co-funded by LIFE 2016 Programme, we examined the effectiveness of an indoor exposure-reduction intervention (i.e., decrease home ventilation during DDS events and continuous use of air purifier during DDS and non-DDS days) across homes and/or classrooms of schoolchildren with asthma and adults with atrial fibrillation in Cyprus and Crete-Greece. Participants were randomized to a control or intervention groups, including an indoor intervention group with exposure reduction measures and the use of air purifiers. Particle sampling, PM10 and PM2.5, was conducted in participants' homes and/or classrooms, between 2019 and 2022, during DDS-free weeks and during DDS days for as long as the event lasted. In indoor and outdoor PM10 and PM2.5 samples, mass and content in main and trace elements was determined. Indoor PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations, adjusting for premise type and dust conditions, were significantly lower in the indoor intervention group compared to the control group (PM2.5-intervention/PM2.5-control = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.70; PM10-intervention/PM10-control = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.71). In addition, the PM2.5 and PM10 particles of outdoor origin were significantly lower in the intervention vs. the control group (PM2.5 infiltration intervention-to-control ratio: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.58; PM10 infiltration intervention-to-control ratio: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.89). Our findings suggest that the use of air purifiers alongside decreased ventilation measures is an effective protective measure that reduces significantly indoor exposure to particles during DDS and non-DDS in high-risk population groups.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Trace Elements , Adult , Humans , Child , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring , Dust/prevention & control , Dust/analysis , Particulate Matter/analysis , Particle Size
10.
Environ Res ; 218: 115034, 2023 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36502900

ABSTRACT

Using an indoor air purifier is an important solution for improving indoor air quality and protecting people from the harmful effects of air pollution on their health. The filter air purifiers can remove particulate matter including bioaerosols, but their filter media can cause secondary pollution. To fulfill this need, a new filterless indoor air purifier, the Cloud-Air-Purifying (CAP) air purifier, is presented in this study. Using heterogeneous condensation and supergravity technology, the CAP air purifier grows and collects fine particles, while rapidly disinfecting bioaerosols with chemical disinfection and ultraviolet (UV) disinfection. Furthermore, the purifying performance of the CAP air purifier was tested in a simulated cabin. The results showed the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of the CAP air purifier was approximately 150 m3/h, and the effective coefficient was 0.93. The CAP air purifier was highly efficient in purifying fine particulate matter, 93% for PM10 and 91% for particle size of 0.5-1 µm in 60 min, which was 13-58 times more than natural decay. The reason for the efficient removal of fine particles is that they can condense and grow in water vapor supersaturated environment and be collected in a supergravity field. Moreover, the CAP air purifier has significant bactericidal effects on bioaerosols. It achieved a disinfection efficiency of 99.99997% by decreasing bioaerosols from 108 CFU/m3 to less than 30 CFU/m3 in only 20 min when particle purification in combination with UV disinfection and disinfectant (ClO2). Furthermore, ClO2 release concentrations, noise, and power consumption were investigated for application purposes, with results showing that they were within acceptable limits. The study presents an innovative idea and design for preventing airborne microorganisms and particulate matter through heterogeneous condensation technology.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Air Pollution , Humans , Particulate Matter/analysis , Particle Size , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Air Pollutants/analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods
11.
Build Simul ; 16(1): 3-12, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36277843

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, is evolving. Thus, the risk of airborne transmission in confined spaces may be higher, and corresponding precautions should be re-appraised. Here, we obtained the quantum generation rate (q) value of three SARS-CoV-2 variants (Alpha, Delta, and Omicron) for the Wells-Riley equation with a reproductive number-based fitted approach and estimated the association between the infection probability and ventilation rates. The q value was 89-165 h-1 for Alpha variant, 312-935 h-1 for Delta variant, and 725-2,345 h-1 for Omicron variant. The ventilation rates increased to ensure an infection probability of less than 1%, and were 8,000-14,000 m3 h-1, 26,000-80,000 m3 h-1, and 64,000-250,000 m3 h-1 per infector for the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. If the infector and susceptible person wore N95 masks, the required ventilation rates decreased to about 1/100 of the values required without masks, which can be achieved in most typical scenarios. An air purifier was ineffective for reducing transmission when used in scenarios without masks. Preventing prolonged exposure time in confined spaces remains critical in reducing the risk of airborne transmission for highly contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants.

12.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 20(1): 1-13, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36256520

ABSTRACT

A series of experiments in stationary and moving passenger railcars was conducted to measure the removal rates of particles in the size ranges of SARS-CoV-2 viral aerosols, and the air changes per hour provided by the existing and modified air handling systems. The effect of ventilation and air filtration systems on removal rates and their effects on estimated probability (i.e., risk) of infection was evaluated in a range of representative conditions: (1) for two different ratios of recirculated air (RA) to outdoor air (OA) (90:10 RA:OA and 67:33 RA:OA); (2) using minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) filters with standard (MERV-8) and increased (MERV-13) filtration ratings; and (3) in the presence and absence of a portable high-efficiency particulate-air (HEPA) room air purifier system operated at clean air delivery rate (CADR) of 150 and 550 cfm. The higher-efficiency MERV-13 filters significantly increased particle removal rates on average by 3.8 to 8.4 hr-1 across particle sizes ranging from 0.3 to 10 µm (p < 0.01) compared to MERV-8 filters. The different RA:OA ratios and the use of a portable HEPA air purifier system had little effect on particle removal rates. MERV-13 filters reduced the estimated probability of infection by 42% compared to the MERV-8 filter. The use of a HEPA-air purifier with a MERV-13 filter causes a 50% reduction in the estimated probability of infection. Upgrading the efficiency of HVAC filters from MERV-8 to MERV-13 in public transit vehicles is the most effective exposure control method resulting in a clear reduction in the removal rates of aerosol particles and the estimated probability of infection.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Air Pollution, Indoor , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Respiratory Aerosols and Droplets , Filtration/methods , Particle Size , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis
13.
J Sleep Res ; 32(3): e13782, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36351665

ABSTRACT

Insufficient quantity and quality of sleep is a public health concern that can be addressed by interventions for improving sleep outcomes. Environmental factors such as poor air quality are a potential target for intervention, particularly in light of associations between air pollution and worse sleep. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of using an air purifier on sleep outcomes and mood in 30 healthy adults. There were two conditions: (i) air purifier with a high-efficiency particulate air filter; (ii) air purifier with a placebo filter. Participants undertook both conditions, each over 2 weeks with a 2-week washout, following a counterbalanced, double-blind design. Daily sleep outcomes were measured with actigraphy watches and sleep diaries, whilst daily mood was assessed with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. The Insomnia Severity Index, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured pre- and post-. The purifier filter was associated with increased total sleep time for an average of 12 min per night, and increased total time in bed for an average of 19 min per night relative to the placebo. There were several sleep and mood outcomes for which no changes were observed, and time awake after sleep onset was higher for the purifier filter. Air quality was better during the high-efficiency particulate air filter condition. These findings offer positive indications that environmental interventions that improve air quality can have benefits for sleep outcomes in healthy populations who are not exhibiting clinical sleep disturbances.


Subject(s)
Sleep Quality , Sleep , Humans , Adult , Pilot Projects , Affect , Actigraphy
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36361438

ABSTRACT

In this study we investigated the effectiveness of air purifiers and in-line filters in ventilation systems working simultaneously inside various classrooms at the University of Southern California (USC) main campus. We conducted real-time measurements of particle mass (PM), particle number (PN), and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in nine classrooms from September 2021 to January 2022. The measurement campaign was carried out with different configurations of the purifier (i.e., different flow rates) while the ventilation system was continuously working. Our results showed that the ventilation systems in the classrooms were adequate in providing sufficient outdoor air to dilute indoor CO2 concentrations due to the high air exchange rates (2.63-8.63 h-1). The particle penetration coefficients (P) of the investigated classrooms were very low for PM (<0.2) and PN (<0.1), with the exception of one classroom, corroborating the effectiveness of in-line filters in the ventilation systems. Additionally, the results showed that the efficiency of the air purifier exceeded 95% in capturing ultrafine and coarse particles and ranged between 82-88% for particles in the accumulation range (0.3-2 µm). The findings of this study underline the effectiveness of air purifiers and ventilation systems equipped with efficient in-line filters in substantially reducing indoor air pollution.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Air Pollutants , Air Pollution, Indoor , Humans , Air Pollution, Indoor/prevention & control , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Universities , Carbon Dioxide , Ventilation , Air Pollutants/analysis , Particulate Matter/analysis , Schools , Environmental Monitoring
15.
Indoor Air ; 32(11): e13173, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36437657

ABSTRACT

Indoor PM2.5 in apartments must be effectively managed to minimize adverse impacts on human health. Cooking is the one of the main PM2.5 sources in apartments, and indoor air quality (IAQ) management methods (natural ventilation, mechanical ventilations, range hoods, and air purifiers) are typically used to reduce PM2.5 generated during cooking. For effective control of indoor PM2.5 , prediction of PM2.5 reduction for various IAQ management methods is necessary. This study carefully predicted indoor PM2.5 concentrations in an apartment when IAQ management methods were applied separately and/or in combination during cooking. The infiltration and exfiltration were verified by comparing the experimental results of CO2 concentration with those predicted with or without mechanical ventilation. The deposition rate for PM2.5 generated by cooking was also derived by comparing the experimental PM2.5 changes with the predicted values for PM2.5 natural decay. Through this method, effective PM2.5 control ways during cooking in apartments can be proposed, such as natural ventilation with a range hood for 30 min and then the operation of an air purifier for 30 min. Additionally, if this prediction is combined with energy consumption, it will be possible to propose the most energy-efficient indoor PM2.5 control methods for various seasons and outdoor conditions.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Humans , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Cooking , Particulate Matter/analysis , Republic of Korea
16.
Indoor Air ; 32(11): e13163, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36437679

ABSTRACT

During wildfire smoke events public health agencies release advisories to stay indoors, close doors and windows, and operate a portable air cleaner (PAC). The do-it-yourself (DIY) air cleaner consisting of a box fan and a furnace filter is a widely used low-cost alternative to commercial PACs because of its increased accessibility. In this study, we evaluate the clean air delivery rate (CADR) of different DIY air cleaner designs for reducing simulated wildfire smoke and identify operating parameters that may impact their performance and use. The simplest formulation of a DIY air cleaner (box fan with taped on minimum effectiveness reporting value - [MERV] 13 furnace filter) had a CADR of 111.2 ± 1.3 ft3 /min (CFM). Increasing the fan flow by changing the fan type, increasing the fan setting, or reducing the pressure drop across the filtering surface increased the CADR. Large increases in CADR could be obtained by using a shroud (40%), using a 4″ thick filter (123%) using two filters in a wedge shape (137%), or using four filters in a Corsi-Rosenthal (CR) box design (261%). The CADR was greatly reduced with filters heavily loaded with smoke, pointing to the need for frequent filter changes during smoke events.


Subject(s)
Air Pollution, Indoor , Wildfires , Smoke/analysis , Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis , Environment, Controlled , Housing
17.
Environ Pollut ; 315: 120418, 2022 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257562

ABSTRACT

Particulate matter (PM) released by printers may cause airway inflammation and cardiac electrophysiological changes. We conducted a two-stage crossover study to examine the association between short-term exposure to printing shop particles (PSPs) and the heart rate variability (HRV) among healthy volunteers, as well as to evaluate the effect of air purifier intervention. The on-site assessments of PSPs and individual HRV parameters of the volunteers were used to analyze the influence of size-fractionated PSPs and air purifier intervention on HRV at different lag times after PSPs exposure (0 min, 5 min, 15 min, and 30 min) by using the linear mixed-effects models. We observed that changes in 6 HRV parameters were associated with particle mass concentration (PMC) of PSPs, and changes in 8 HRV parameters were associated with particle number concentration (PNC) of PSPs. The sensitive HRV parameters were the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals (rMSSD), NN50 count divided by the total number of all NN intervals (pNN50), normalized high frequency power (nHF), very high frequency power (VHF), normalized low frequency power (nLF), and the ratio of low frequency power to high frequency power (LF/HF). Most HRV parameters exhibited the strongest effect associated with PMC and PNC at a lag time of 30 min. The air purifier intervention markedly reduced the PNC and PMC of size-fractionated PSPs, enhanced 5 HRV parameters, and decreased the nLF and LF/HF. Our study suggests that short-term exposure to PSPs can affect HRV parameters, reflecting changes in cardiac autonomic nervous activity, and the use of an air purifier can reduce the concentration of PSPs and improve the autonomic nervous system activity of the exposed individuals.


Subject(s)
Air Filters , Humans , Heart Rate , Healthy Volunteers , Cross-Over Studies , Printing, Three-Dimensional
18.
Toxics ; 10(10)2022 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287854

ABSTRACT

Mass COVID-19 infection cases in indoor spaces have been continuously reported since its global outbreak, generating increasing public interest in reducing the spread of the virus. This study considered a situation in which an infected individual continuously releases the virus into the air in a classroom, simulated by continuous injection of NaCl particles ≤ 5 µm, with heater operation during winter. The effects of applying natural ventilation and operating one or two air purifiers on the removal of virus-containing aerosols were experimentally compared and analyzed based on the spatiotemporal changes in NaCl concentration within the classroom. When a heater was operated with all windows shut, operating one and two air purifiers reduced the amount of the aerosol in indoor air by approximately 50 and 60%, respectively, compared to the case with no air purifier. Additionally, when the heater was operated with one or two air purifiers under natural ventilation, the amount of virus-containing aerosol in the air was reduced by 86-88% compared to the case with neither natural ventilation nor air purifier. Because natural ventilation significantly varies with weather conditions and particulate matter concentrations, combining natural ventilation with air purifiers in classrooms during winter needs to be adjusted appropriately.

19.
Toxics ; 10(10)2022 Oct 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287889

ABSTRACT

Indoor PM2.5 must be effectively controlled to minimize adverse impacts on public health. Cooking is one of the main sources of PM2.5 in residential areas, and indoor air quality (IAQ) management methods such as natural and mechanical ventilation, range hood, and air purifier are typically used to reduce cooking-generated PM2.5 concentrations. However, studies on the combined effects of various IAQ management methods on indoor PM2.5 reduction and energy consumption are limited. In this study, a theoretical model was established to estimate the performance of various IAQ management methods for controlling indoor PM2.5 concentrations and energy consumption. The model was verified by comparative experiments in which, various IAQ management methods were operated individually or combined. Seasonal energy consumption was calculated through the verified model, and energy consumption saving scenarios were derived for maintaining indoor PM2.5 concentrations less than 10 µg/m3, a World Health Organization annual guideline, under fair and poor outdoor PM2.5 concentrations of 15 and 50 µg/m3, respectively. Based on our results, we found that energy consumption could be reduced significantly by applying natural ventilation in spring, autumn, and summer and mechanical ventilation in winter. Our study identified efficient energy saving PM2.5 management scenarios using various IAQ management methods by predicting indoor PM2.5 concentration and energy consumption according to the annual life patterns of typical residents in South Korea.

20.
Toxics ; 10(10)2022 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36287896

ABSTRACT

It is important to control airborne particles in residential houses for protecting human health. Indoor particulate matter of <2.5 µm (PM2.5) can be effectively monitored and managed using an air purifier. In this study, the actual clean air delivery rates in residential houses (CADRActual) were acquired by comparing decay rates of fine particles with and without operations of the air purifier under actual conditions, following the standard CADR of an air purifier obtained in a closed test chamber. The measurements of CADRActual at different outdoor PM2.5 concentrations over a month in two residential houses revealed different airtightness levels, compared to the standardized clean air delivery rate of the air purifier (CADRAP). Air changes per hour at 50 Pa (ACH50) was 4.8 h−1 for "house A" (built in 2007) and 2.1 h−1 for "house B" (built in 2018). The CADR of the air purifier used in this study was 10.6 m3/min, while the averaged CADRActual at the "house A" was 7.2 m3/min (approximately 66% of the CADR of the air purifier) and 9.5 m3/min at "house B" (approximately 90% of the CADR of the air purifier). Under the outdoor PM2.5 concentrations of <35 µg/m3, the averaged CADRActual of house A and house B were 7.8 ± 0.3 and 9.7 ± 0.4 m3/min, respectively. However, under the outdoor PM2.5 concentrations of >35 µg/m3, the analogous averaged concentrations were 6.8 ± 0.6 and 9.6 ± 0.3 m3/min for houses A and B, respectively. The measured CADRActual agreed well with the theoretical estimates of CADRActual acquired by the mass balance equation using the infiltration rate of ACH50/20. We also estimated CADRActual/CADRAP for house C built in 2017, where the ACH50 was 1.8 h−1. Overall, this study demonstrated how CADRActual/CADRAP of an air purifier at residential houses can be predicted according to outdoor PM2.5 concentration and airtightness of the house. As shown, it can be closer to 1 at lower ACH50 houses and at lower outdoor PM2.5 concentrations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...